Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Corticosteroids for preventing postherpetic neuralgia

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005582.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 diciembre 2010see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Neuromuscular

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Ning Chen

    Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

  • Mi Yang

    Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

  • Li He

    Correspondencia a: Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    [email protected]

  • Dongping Zhang

    Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

  • Muke Zhou

    Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

  • Cairong Zhu

    Epidemic Disease & Health Statistics Department, School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China

Contributions of authors

Ning Chen and Mi Yang performed the updated searches, identified the studies, assessed their methodological quality according to new criteria, extracted the data, and produced the draft of the updated review. Li He is a consultant and expert in this field. She is the contact author and originally suggested the review and contributed to writing the final version of the protocol and review. She also contributed to updating the review and offering expert advice. Dongping Zhang developed and wrote the protocol and first review, and entered the text into Review Manager. Muke Zhou contributed to developing and writing the final version of the protocol and review. Cairong Zhu contributed to writing the section of the manuscript that refers to the planned statistical analysis.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • None, Not specified.

External sources

  • None, Not specified.

Declarations of interest

None known

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the Chinese Evidence‐Based Medicine Center and Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group for their technical support. We thank Professor Richard Hughes, Kate Jewitt, Janice Fernandes, Ruth Brassington, Rachel Barton and Dr Tony Swan for their advice and encouragement in the preparation of this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2023 Dec 05

Corticosteroids for preventing postherpetic neuralgia

Review

Xin Jiang, Yanbo Li, Ning Chen, Muke Zhou, Li He

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005582.pub5

2013 Mar 28

Corticosteroids for preventing postherpetic neuralgia

Review

Ying Han, Jingjing Zhang, Ning Chen, Li He, Muke Zhou, Cairong Zhu

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005582.pub4

2010 Dec 08

Corticosteroids for preventing postherpetic neuralgia

Review

Ning Chen, Mi Yang, Li He, Dongping Zhang, Muke Zhou, Cairong Zhu

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005582.pub3

2008 Jan 23

Corticosteroids for preventing postherpetic neuralgia

Review

Li He, Dongping Zhang, Muke Zhou, Cairong Zhu

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005582.pub2

2006 Jan 25

Corticosteroids for preventing postherpetic neuralgia

Protocol

Li He, Dongping Zhang, Muke Zhou, Cairong Zhu

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005582

Differences between protocol and review

In this 2010 update we assessed risk of bias using new methods, and added a 'Summary of findings' table. The protocol was changed to exclude quasi‐RCTs, because RCTs are thought to be the only way to prevent systematic differences of baseline characteristics between intervention groups, according to the latest Corchrane Handbook. However, no quasi‐RCTs were found.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.