Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Carbamazepine for acute and chronic pain in adults

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 10 abril 2014

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005451.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 19 enero 2011see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Dolor y cuidados paliativos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Philip J Wiffen

    Correspondencia a: UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford, UK

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Sheena Derry

    Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

  • R Andrew Moore

    Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

  • Henry J McQuay

    Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Contributions of authors

PW registered the title, wrote the protocol, carried out searching and identified studies for inclusion. PW & RAM carried out data extraction, analysis, and drafting. All authors contributed to the final draft and approved the published version.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Marie Curie Cancer Care for earlier version of this review, UK.

  • NHS R&D funds, UK.

  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Programme, UK.

    Support for RAM

Declarations of interest

All authors have received research support from charities, government or industry sources at various times. RAM and HJM have consulted for various pharmaceutical companies. RAM, and HJM have received lecture fees from pharmaceutical companies related to analgesics and other healthcare interventions. Support for this review came from Oxford Pain Research, the NHS Cochrane Collaboration Programme Grant Scheme, and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Programme.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Apr 10

Carbamazepine for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults

Review

Philip J Wiffen, Sheena Derry, R Andrew Moore, Eija A Kalso

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005451.pub3

2011 Jan 19

Carbamazepine for acute and chronic pain in adults

Review

Philip J Wiffen, Sheena Derry, R Andrew Moore, Henry J McQuay

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005451.pub2

2005 Jul 20

Carbamazepine for acute and chronic pain in adults

Review

Philip J Wiffen, Sheena Derry, R Andrew Moore, Henry J McQuay

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005451

Differences between protocol and review

The major difference between the original protocol and this update is the concentration on issues of methodological validity and bias that have emerged subsequently ‐ namely on size, on duration, on outcome, and potentially on a dependence on crossover designs. These are commented on and referenced in the updated review.

Notes

This review has been substantially amended following a search for new trials up to June 2010.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.