Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Contenido relacionado

Ir a:

Revisiones y protocolos relacionados

Topics

Temas

Comparison 1 INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM, Outcome 1 Physical signs (any attacks in last 2 weeks, high=poor, short term).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM, Outcome 1 Physical signs (any attacks in last 2 weeks, high=poor, short term).

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 1 INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM, Outcome 2 Mental state (endpoint data, short term, HRSA, high=poor).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM, Outcome 2 Mental state (endpoint data, short term, HRSA, high=poor).

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 1 INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM, Outcome 3 Leaving the study early (endpoint data, short term).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM, Outcome 3 Leaving the study early (endpoint data, short term).

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 2 INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + HYPNOSIS versus INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + INDIVIDUAL SESSIONS, Outcome 1 Leaving the study early ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + HYPNOSIS versus INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + INDIVIDUAL SESSIONS, Outcome 1 Leaving the study early ‐ short term.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 1 Physical signs (endpoint data, short term, high=poor).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 1 Physical signs (endpoint data, short term, high=poor).

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 2 Mental state (endpoint data, short term, SCL‐90, high =poor).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 2 Mental state (endpoint data, short term, SCL‐90, high =poor).

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Study

Intervention

Mean

sd

N

Notes

Interview data (ICIDH, high=poor)

Moene 2003

Hypnosis

13.2

10.6

20

Moene 2003

Controls

16.6

11.7

23

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 3 Physical disability.

Ir a la figura de la revisión

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 4 Leaving the study early ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 4 Leaving the study early ‐ short term.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 5 Hypnotisability (baseline, SHCS, high =good).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 5 Hypnotisability (baseline, SHCS, high =good).

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva
Comparison 1. INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Physical signs (any attacks in last 2 weeks, high=poor, short term) Show forest plot

1

30

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.17 [0.02, 1.22]

2 Mental state (endpoint data, short term, HRSA, high=poor) Show forest plot

1

30

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.73 [‐6.96, ‐0.50]

3 Leaving the study early (endpoint data, short term) Show forest plot

1

30

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM
Ir a la tabla de la revisión
Comparison 2. INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + HYPNOSIS versus INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + INDIVIDUAL SESSIONS

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Leaving the study early ‐ short term Show forest plot

1

49

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.14, 5.79]
Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + HYPNOSIS versus INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + INDIVIDUAL SESSIONS
Ir a la tabla de la revisión
Comparison 3. OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Physical signs (endpoint data, short term, high=poor) Show forest plot

1

43

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.10 [1.29, 2.91]

1.1 Observation (VRMC, high =good)

1

43

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.10 [1.29, 2.91]

2 Mental state (endpoint data, short term, SCL‐90, high =poor) Show forest plot

1

43

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐12.30 [‐44.28, 19.68]

3 Physical disability Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

3.1 Interview data (ICIDH, high=poor)

Other data

No numeric data

4 Leaving the study early ‐ short term Show forest plot

1

49

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.08 [0.42, 10.34]

5 Hypnotisability (baseline, SHCS, high =good) Show forest plot

1

43

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐1.09, 0.89]
Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST
Ir a la tabla de la revisión