Insoles for prevention and treatment of back pain

Tali Sahar; Matan J Cohen; Vered Ne'eman; Leonid Kandel; Daniel Oluwafemi Odebiyi; Ishay Lev; Mayer Brezis; Amnon Lahad

doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005275.pub2

Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Contenido relacionado

Ir a:

Revisiones y protocolos relacionados
Guías
Temas

Revisiones y protocolos relacionados

Topics

Temas

Figure 1

Summary of risks of bias

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Prevention trials, Outcome 1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Prevention trials ‐ ITT Assuming all dropouts did not have back pain, Outcome 1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Prevention trials ‐ ITT Assuming dropouts were similar to controls, Outcome 1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Prevention trials ‐ High quality, Outcome 1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Prevention trials ‐ High quality ‐ ITT Assuming all dropout did not have back pain, Outcome 1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Prevention trials ‐ High Quality ‐ ITT Assuming dropouts were similar to controls, Outcome 1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 Prevention trials ‐ Customized insoles, Outcome 1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8 Prevention trials ‐ Customized insoles ‐ ITT Assuming all dropout did not have back pain, Outcome 1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9 Prevention trials ‐ Customized insoles‐ ITT Assuming dropouts were similar to controls, Outcome 1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 10.1

Comparison 10 Prevention trials ‐ Non customized insoles, Outcome 1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 11.1

Comparison 11 Prevention trials ‐ Not Customized insoles‐ ITT Assuming all dropout did not have back pain, Outcome 1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 12.1

Comparison 12 Prevention trials ‐ Not Customized insoles‐ ITT Assuming dropouts were similar to controls, Outcome 1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 1. Prevention trials

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention Show forest plot	3	1688	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.73 [0.43, 1.22]

Comparison 1. Prevention trials

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

Comparison 2. Prevention trials ‐ ITT Assuming all dropouts did not have back pain

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention Show forest plot	3	2061	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.74 [0.43, 1.27]

Comparison 2. Prevention trials ‐ ITT Assuming all dropouts did not have back pain

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

Comparison 3. Prevention trials ‐ ITT Assuming dropouts were similar to controls

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention Show forest plot	3	2061	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.85 [0.58, 1.23]

Comparison 3. Prevention trials ‐ ITT Assuming dropouts were similar to controls

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

Comparison 4. Prevention trials ‐ High quality

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention Show forest plot	2	300	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.79 [0.46, 1.39]

Comparison 4. Prevention trials ‐ High quality

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

Comparison 5. Prevention trials ‐ High quality ‐ ITT Assuming all dropout did not have back pain

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention Show forest plot	2	550	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.81 [0.46, 1.45]

Comparison 5. Prevention trials ‐ High quality ‐ ITT Assuming all dropout did not have back pain

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

Comparison 6. Prevention trials ‐ High Quality ‐ ITT Assuming dropouts were similar to controls

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention Show forest plot	2	550	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.90 [0.61, 1.32]

Comparison 6. Prevention trials ‐ High Quality ‐ ITT Assuming dropouts were similar to controls

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

Comparison 7. Prevention trials ‐ Customized insoles

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention Show forest plot	2	249	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.74 [0.34, 1.61]

Comparison 7. Prevention trials ‐ Customized insoles

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

Comparison 8. Prevention trials ‐ Customized insoles ‐ ITT Assuming all dropout did not have back pain

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention Show forest plot	2	414	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.81 [0.43, 1.52]

Comparison 8. Prevention trials ‐ Customized insoles ‐ ITT Assuming all dropout did not have back pain

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

Comparison 9. Prevention trials ‐ Customized insoles‐ ITT Assuming dropouts were similar to controls

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention Show forest plot	2	414	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.83 [0.53, 1.31]

Comparison 9. Prevention trials ‐ Customized insoles‐ ITT Assuming dropouts were similar to controls

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

Comparison 10. Prevention trials ‐ Non customized insoles

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention Show forest plot	2	1492	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.69 [0.33, 1.43]

Comparison 10. Prevention trials ‐ Non customized insoles

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

Comparison 11. Prevention trials ‐ Not Customized insoles‐ ITT Assuming all dropout did not have back pain

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention Show forest plot	2	1782	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.66 [0.31, 1.42]

Comparison 11. Prevention trials ‐ Not Customized insoles‐ ITT Assuming all dropout did not have back pain

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

Comparison 12. Prevention trials ‐ Not Customized insoles‐ ITT Assuming dropouts were similar to controls

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Insoles vs placebo/No intervention Show forest plot	2	1782	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.78 [0.37, 1.65]

Comparison 12. Prevention trials ‐ Not Customized insoles‐ ITT Assuming dropouts were similar to controls

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

The Cochrane Library

Scolaris Language Selector Scolaris Language Selector

Idioma de la Revisión Cochrane

Idioma de la web

Scolaris Content Language Banner Portlet Scolaris Content Language Banner Portlet