Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Honey as a topical treatment for wounds

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005083.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 octubre 2008see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Heridas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Andrew B Jull

    Correspondencia a: School of Nursing, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    [email protected]

  • Anthony Rodgers

    Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Auckland, New Zealand

  • Natalie Walker

    Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Contributions of authors

Andrew Jull:
Designed and coordinated the review. Extracted data and undertook quality assessment. Analysed or interpreted data and performed statistical analysis. Wrote to study author/experts/companies. Completed first draft of the review and approved final review prior to submission. Guarantor of the review.

Anthony Rodgers:
Designed the review and performed part of writing or editing of the review. Made an intellectual contribution to the review. Approved final review prior to submission.

Natalie Walker:
Designed the review and checked quality of data extraction. Checked quality assessment and the quality of statistical analysis. Performed part of writing or editing of the review. Approved final review prior to submission.

Contributions of editorial base:

Nicky Cullum:
Edited the review, advised on methodology, interpretation and review content.
Approved the final review prior to submission.

Sally Bell‐Syer:
Coordinated the editorial process.
Advised on methodology, interpretation and content.
Edited and copy edited the review.

Ruth Foxlee:
Designed the search strategy and edited the search methods section.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Senior Health Research Scholarship, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

Andrew Jull, Natalie Walker and Anthony Rodgers were investigators in the Honey as Adjuvant Leg ulcer Treatment (HALT) trial (ISRCTN 06161544), one of the trials included in this review. The Clinical Trials Research Unit, which employs Andrew Jull, Natalie Walker and Antony Rodgers received a small unconditional cash contribution from a manufacturer of honey dressings for the conduct of the HALT trial.

Acknowledgements

The reviewers would like to thank the following referees for their comments on the review, Wounds Group Editors: Mieke Flour, Andrea Nelson and Gill Worthy, referees: Margaret Harrison, Lois Orton, Consumer referee: Durhane Wong‐Rieger.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2015 Mar 06

Honey as a topical treatment for wounds

Review

Andrew B Jull, Nicky Cullum, Jo C Dumville, Maggie J Westby, Sohan Deshpande, Natalie Walker

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005083.pub4

2013 Feb 28

Honey as a topical treatment for wounds

Review

Andrew B Jull, Natalie Walker, Sohan Deshpande

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005083.pub3

2008 Oct 08

Honey as a topical treatment for wounds

Review

Andrew B Jull, Anthony Rodgers, Natalie Walker

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005083.pub2

2004 Apr 19

Honey as a topical treatment for wounds

Protocol

Andrew B Jull, Anthony Rodgers, Natalie Walker

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005083

Differences between protocol and review

Two trials that compared active interventions allocated wounds to the interventions rather than participants (Oluwatosin 2000; Okeniyi 2005). The participants had multiple wounds in many cases and some participants would have received both interventions. The data in these trials was presented by wound and thus could not be combined (if possible) with trials where data was presented by participant. Such a scenario was not foreseen in the protocol where it was assumed data would be presented by participant. Presenting data by wound rather than by participant inappropriately increases the power of a study. These trials were excluded from this review.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.