Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Action plans with limited patient education only for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005074.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 12 mayo 2010see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Vías respiratorias

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Julia AE Walters

    Correspondencia a: Menzies Research Institute, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Allison C Turnock

    General Practice Training Tasmania, New Town, Australia

  • E. Haydn Walters

    Menzies Research Institute, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia

  • Richard Wood‐Baker

    Menzies Research Institute, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia

Contributions of authors

Julia Walters. Original review 2005: advised on search strategy, performed study selection, data extraction and meta‐analysis, revised review drafts. 2009 update: repeat searches, study selection, risk of bias assessment for all included studies, data extraction and meta‐analysis, wrote update review drafts.

R. Wood‐Baker. Original review 2005: Formulated review topic, advised on search strategy, data extraction and meta‐analysis, revised review drafts. 2009 update: study selection, data checking, analysis and revising drafts of review update.

E. H. Walters. Editing protocol and review drafts in 2005 and 2009.

Alison Turnock: Original review 2005 screened search results against inclusion criteria, data management, data extraction and analyses, wrote initial draft and cooperated in editing initial 2005 version of review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Tasmania, Australia.

External sources

  • Commonwealth Department of Health and Aging, Australia.

Declarations of interest

One reviewer (RWB) was an investigator in an included study (Wood‐Baker 2006).

Acknowledgements

Toby Lasserson ‐ helped with the overall construction of the review.
Chris Cates ‐ shared statistical knowledge, assisted with summary of findings table and provided suggestions and comments on review conclusions.
Elizabeth Arnold and Susan Hansen ‐ performed searches of CENTRAL database.
Lucy Webster ‐ checking study data extraction.

We acknowledge and thank the following trialists who provided missing study information and study data: Geert Rootmensen, Paul Watson, Richard Wood‐Baker.

We thank the following people who responded to requests for information on studies for inclusion or exclusion, and those still in progress ‐ Jean Bourbeau, Michael Epton, Robyn Maguigan, Samantha Prigmore, Harry Rea, Ian Town, Paul Watson, John Wellingham.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2016 Dec 19

Action plans with brief patient education for exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Review

Maxwell Howcroft, E Haydn Walters, Richard Wood‐Baker, Julia AE Walters

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005074.pub4

2010 May 12

Action plans with limited patient education only for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Review

Julia AE Walters, Allison C Turnock, E. Haydn Walters, Richard Wood‐Baker

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005074.pub3

2005 Oct 19

Action plans for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Review

Allison C Turnock, E. Haydn Walters, Julia AE Walters, Richard Wood‐Baker

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005074.pub2

2005 Jan 24

Action plans for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Protocol

Allison C Turnock, E Haydn Walters, Julia AE Walters, Richard Wood‐Baker

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005074

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.