Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Action plans with limited patient education only for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Abstract

disponible en

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive disease characterised by exacerbations, usually infective in origin, which affect symptoms and quality of life. Action plans may help individuals recognise a deterioration in their symptoms and initiate changes to treatment early, thereby reducing the impact of the exacerbation.

Objectives

To assess the efficacy of action plans in the management of COPD.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (7 July 2009), CENTRAL, MEDLINE , CINAHL and ongoing trials registers (last searched July 2009).

Selection criteria

Randomised controlled trials of an individual action plan with minimal or no self management education, compared to control in patients with COPD were included. Studies in asthma and in multi‐faceted interventions in which an action plan was combined with other elements such as education programme, exercise programme or outreach visits were excluded.

Data collection and analysis

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted investigators for additional information when necessary.

Main results

Five studies enrolling 574 participants with moderate or severe COPD, with follow‐up from six to twelve months, were included. There was no evidence that action plans reduced health care utilisation; assessed by hospital admission (mean difference (MD) 0.23; 95% CI ‐0.03 to 0.49), emergency department visits (MD 0.37; 95% CI ‐0.50 to 1.24) or GP visits (MD 0.53; ‐0.45, 1.50). Use of action plans was associated with increased initiation of treatment for acute exacerbations. Oral corticosteroid use was increased over 12 months (MD 0.74; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.35) with a significant increase in odds of being treated with antibiotics over 12 months (odds ratio 1.65; 95% CI 1.01 to 2.69). Self management knowledge and intention to initiate appropriate actions were improved in one study; recognition of a severe exacerbation (MD 2.50; 95% CI 1.04 to 3.96) and self initiating action in a severe exacerbation (MD 1.50; 95% CI 0.62 to 2.38). Health‐related quality of life data were limited.

Authors' conclusions

There is evidence that action plans with limited COPD education aid recognition of, and response to, an exacerbation with initiation of antibiotics and corticosteroids. Only one study measured patients' self health appropriate behaviour (decision making and taking action). There is no evidence of reduced healthcare resources utilisation or improved health‐related quality of life.The practice of giving patients an action plan and limited self‐management education for the management of COPD exacerbations, without a multi‐faceted self‐management program or ongoing case management cannot be recommended as the standard of care in COPD.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Plain language summary

Action plans for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive disease characterised by exacerbations, usually infective in origin, which affect symptoms and quality of life. Action plans are designed to help an individual recognise a deterioration in their symptoms and initiate changes to treatment early and reduce the impact of the exacerbation. This review found that the use of action plans results in an increased ability to recognise and react appropriately to an exacerbation by individuals. There was no evidence that these behavioural changes reduced health care utilisation or improved quality of life.