Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005067.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 octubre 2008see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Piel

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Urbà González

    Correspondencia a: Unit of Dermatology, CLĺNICA GO&FER, Barcelona, Spain

    [email protected]

  • Mariona Pinart

    Department of Dermatology, Research Unit for Evidence‐based Dermatology, Hospital Plató, Barcelona, Spain

  • Ludovic Reveiz

    Free time independent Cochrane reviewer, Potomac, USA

  • Jorge Alvar

    Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland

Contributions of authors

Link with editorial base and co‐ordinate contributions from co‐reviewers (UG)

Searching for trials (includes developing a search strategy, obtaining papers, contacting authors, investigators or drug companies) (UG, MP, LR)

Selecting which trials to include and extracting data from trials (UG, MP, LR)

Enter data into RevMan (MP)

Carry out analysis (UG, MP)

Interpret data (UG, MP)

Draft final review (contribution from all)

The expert representative (JA) focused on relevance and applicability of the review

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Spanish Society of Dermatology and Venereology and Evidence‐Based Dermatology (SEDE‐DBE), Spain.

  • Hospital Plató, c/ Plató 21 08006 Barcelona, Spain.

External sources

  • Office of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases (WHO/CDS/NTD/IDM), Communicable Disease Cluster, World Health Organization, Switzerland.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge: Carmen Chica, William Fabe and Neil Hepburn for their help in writing the protocol; María Ángeles Mora and Rosa Amill for the bibliographical support; Alireza Firooz and Ali Khamesipour for translating and data extraction of the Iranian papers; Mario Tristan and Mayda Villalta for their help in the early development of the review; and Monica Chan for her help to develop this review.

This review has been funded by a grant from the Office of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases (WHO/CDS/NTD/IDM), Communicable Diseases Cluster, World Health Organization. It has been also supported in part by the International Health Central American Institute Foundation, the Spanish Society of Dermato‐Epidemiology and Evidence‐based Dermatology (SEDE‐DBE), and the Hospital Plató of Barcelona.

The editorial base wishes to thank Richard Reithinger and Philippe Minodier (external expert referees) and Adrian Burton (consumer) for their helpful comments on this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 Dec 01

Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis

Review

Julio Heras‐Mosteiro, Begoña Monge‐Maillo, Mariona Pinart, Patricia Lopez Pereira, Ludovic Reveiz, Emely Garcia‐Carrasco, Pedro Campuzano Cuadrado, Ana Royuela, Irene Mendez Roman, Rogelio López‐Vélez

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005067.pub5

2017 Nov 17

Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis

Review

Julio Heras‐Mosteiro, Begoña Monge‐Maillo, Mariona Pinart, Patricia Lopez Pereira, Emely Garcia‐Carrasco, Pedro Campuzano Cuadrado, Ana Royuela, Irene Mendez Roman, Rogelio López‐Vélez

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005067.pub4

2008 Oct 08

Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis

Review

Urbà González, Mariona Pinart, Ludovic Reveiz, Jorge Alvar

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005067.pub3

2005 Jan 24

Interventions for solitary or limited cutaneous leishmaniasis

Protocol

Urbà González, Ludovic Reveiz, Monica Chan, W Faber, Neill Hepburn, Carmen Chica

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005067.pub2

2004 Jul 19

Interventions for solitary or limited cutaneous leishmaniasis

Protocol

U González, L Reveiz, M Chan, W Faber, N Hepburn, C Chica

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005067

Differences between protocol and review

The protocol of this review was first entitled "Interventions for solitary or limited cutaneous leishmaniasis". However, we decided to split this subject into two reviews. We have amended the title of this review to "Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis". We have also published a Cochrane protocol entitled "Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis" (Gonzalez 2004). We did this because the Leishmania species in the geographical areas involving the Old World differ from the ones affecting the New World. Due to the title change and also in response to referee comments, we have modified the Background considerably. Also our Objectives have focused on the localised form of CL in the Old World rather than the solitary or limited form of CL.

In the Methods section, we have modified "types of participants" to 'immunocompetent people who have localised OWCL'; we have added a list of interventions under "types of interventions" in response to referees comments and to ease readability and also following advice from the referees under "types of outcome measures" we have clarified the primary outcomes and we added a phrase to define emergence of resistance to the tertiary outcomes.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.