Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Comparison 1 ILMA weekly versus ILMA fortnightly for up to 8 weeks; FU: 2 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 ILMA weekly versus ILMA fortnightly for up to 8 weeks; FU: 2 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Comparison 2 IL SSG versus IM SSG in L. tropica; FU: 2 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 IL SSG versus IM SSG in L. tropica; FU: 2 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Comparison 3 Itraconazole (200 mg for 6 to 8 weeks) versus placebo; FU: 2 to 3 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Itraconazole (200 mg for 6 to 8 weeks) versus placebo; FU: 2 to 3 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Comparison 3 Itraconazole (200 mg for 6 to 8 weeks) versus placebo; FU: 2 to 3 months, Outcome 2 Parasitological cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Itraconazole (200 mg for 6 to 8 weeks) versus placebo; FU: 2 to 3 months, Outcome 2 Parasitological cure.

Comparison 4 Fluconazole (200mg for 6 weeks) versus placebo in L.major; FU: 3 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Fluconazole (200mg for 6 weeks) versus placebo in L.major; FU: 3 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Comparison 5 Oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg/d TD for 4 to 6 weeks versus placebo; FU: 3 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg/d TD for 4 to 6 weeks versus placebo; FU: 3 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Comparison 6 IMMA plus oral pentoxifylline versus IMMA plus placebo for 20 days in L. major; FU: 3 months , Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 IMMA plus oral pentoxifylline versus IMMA plus placebo for 20 days in L. major; FU: 3 months , Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Comparison 7 Oral miltefosine for 28 days versus IMMA for 14 days in L. major; FU: 3 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 Oral miltefosine for 28 days versus IMMA for 14 days in L. major; FU: 3 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Comparison 8 Paromomycin (15% + 10% urea twice daily for 14 days) versus placebo (twice daily for 14 days) mainly in L. major; FU: 2.5 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8 Paromomycin (15% + 10% urea twice daily for 14 days) versus placebo (twice daily for 14 days) mainly in L. major; FU: 2.5 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Comparison 8 Paromomycin (15% + 10% urea twice daily for 14 days) versus placebo (twice daily for 14 days) mainly in L. major; FU: 2.5 months, Outcome 2 Parasitological cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.2

Comparison 8 Paromomycin (15% + 10% urea twice daily for 14 days) versus placebo (twice daily for 14 days) mainly in L. major; FU: 2.5 months, Outcome 2 Parasitological cure.

Comparison 9 Paromomycin (15% + 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus placebo (twice daily for 28 days) in L. major; FU: 2 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9 Paromomycin (15% + 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus placebo (twice daily for 28 days) in L. major; FU: 2 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Comparison 9 Paromomycin (15% + 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus placebo (twice daily for 28 days) in L. major; FU: 2 months, Outcome 2 Prevention of scarring.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.2

Comparison 9 Paromomycin (15% + 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus placebo (twice daily for 28 days) in L. major; FU: 2 months, Outcome 2 Prevention of scarring.

Comparison 9 Paromomycin (15% + 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus placebo (twice daily for 28 days) in L. major; FU: 2 months, Outcome 3 Parasitological cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.3

Comparison 9 Paromomycin (15% + 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus placebo (twice daily for 28 days) in L. major; FU: 2 months, Outcome 3 Parasitological cure.

Comparison 10 Paromomycin (15%+ 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) in L. major; FU: 2 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.1

Comparison 10 Paromomycin (15%+ 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) in L. major; FU: 2 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Comparison 10 Paromomycin (15%+ 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) in L. major; FU: 2 months, Outcome 2 Prevention of scarring.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.2

Comparison 10 Paromomycin (15%+ 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) in L. major; FU: 2 months, Outcome 2 Prevention of scarring.

Comparison 10 Paromomycin (15%+ 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) in L. major; FU: 2 months, Outcome 3 Parasitological cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.3

Comparison 10 Paromomycin (15%+ 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) in L. major; FU: 2 months, Outcome 3 Parasitological cure.

Comparison 11 Paromomycin (4 weeks) versus paromomycin (2 weeks) + placebo (2 weeks) in L. major; FU: 2.5 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.1

Comparison 11 Paromomycin (4 weeks) versus paromomycin (2 weeks) + placebo (2 weeks) in L. major; FU: 2.5 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Comparison 11 Paromomycin (4 weeks) versus paromomycin (2 weeks) + placebo (2 weeks) in L. major; FU: 2.5 months, Outcome 2 Parasitological cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.2

Comparison 11 Paromomycin (4 weeks) versus paromomycin (2 weeks) + placebo (2 weeks) in L. major; FU: 2.5 months, Outcome 2 Parasitological cure.

Comparison 12 Imiquimod (5% 3 times/week x 28 d) + IMMA (20 mg/kg/d x 14 d) versus placebo + i.m. MA in L.tropica; FU: 3.5 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.1

Comparison 12 Imiquimod (5% 3 times/week x 28 d) + IMMA (20 mg/kg/d x 14 d) versus placebo + i.m. MA in L.tropica; FU: 3.5 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Comparison 13 PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) versus placebo in L. major: FU: 2.5 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.1

Comparison 13 PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) versus placebo in L. major: FU: 2.5 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Comparison 13 PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) versus placebo in L. major: FU: 2.5 months, Outcome 2 Prevention of scarring.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.2

Comparison 13 PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) versus placebo in L. major: FU: 2.5 months, Outcome 2 Prevention of scarring.

Comparison 13 PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) versus placebo in L. major: FU: 2.5 months, Outcome 3 Parasitological cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.3

Comparison 13 PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) versus placebo in L. major: FU: 2.5 months, Outcome 3 Parasitological cure.

Comparison 14 Heat versus ILMA once a week for 4 weeks: FU: 6 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.1

Comparison 14 Heat versus ILMA once a week for 4 weeks: FU: 6 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Comparison 15 Thermotherapy versus IM and IL SSG in L. tropica; FU: 2 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.1

Comparison 15 Thermotherapy versus IM and IL SSG in L. tropica; FU: 2 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Comparison 16 Topical honey plus ILMA versus ILMA ; FU: 2.5 to 3 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.1

Comparison 16 Topical honey plus ILMA versus ILMA ; FU: 2.5 to 3 months, Outcome 1 Complete cure.

Table 1. Quasi‐randomised, non‐randomised or uncontrolled studies

Authors

Title

Journal

Observations

Number of participants

Akuffo H, Dietz M, Teklemariam S, Tadesse T, Amare G, Yermane Berhan T

The use of itraconazole in the treatment of leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania aethiopica

Trans R Soc Trop Med & Hyg 1990; 84: 532‐534

Quasi‐randomised trial

14

Al‐Waiz M, Sharique KE, Al‐Assir M

Treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis by intralesional metronidazole

Saudi Med J 2004; 25 (10): 1512‐1513

Non‐randomised trial

73

Asilian A, Sadeghinia A, Faghihi G, Momeni A, Amini Harandi A

The efficacy of treatment with intralesional meglumine antimoniate alone, compared with that of cryotherapy combined with the meglumine antimoniate or intralesional sodium stibogluconate, in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis

Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2003; 97 (5): 493‐498

Non‐randomised trial

180

Daoud S, Boushi L

Azithromycin, ineffective in the treatment of old‐world cutaneous leishmaniasis

Int J Dermatol 2006; 45: 1126‐1128

Non‐randomised trial

45

El‐Darouti MA, Al‐Rubaie SM

Cutaneous leishmaniasis: treatment with combined cryotherapy and intralesional stibogluconate injection

Int J Dermatol 1990; 29(1): 56‐9

Non‐randomised trial

44

El‐Safi SH, Murphy AG, Bryceson ADM, Neal RA

A double‐blind clinical trial of the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with paromomycin ointment

Trans R Soc Trop Med & Hyg 1990; 84: 690‐691

Quasi‐randomised trial (double‐blinded study)

40

Gurei MS, Tatli N, Ozbilge H, Erel O, Seyrek A, Kocygit A, Ulukanligil M

Efficacy of cryotherapy and intralesional pentostam in treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis

J Egypt S Parasitol 2000; 30 (1): 169‐176

Non‐randomised trial

97

Hellier I, Dereure O, Tournillac I, Pratlong F, Guillot B, Dedet JP, Guilhou JJ

Treatment of old world cutaneous leishmaniasis by pentamidine isethionate

Dermatology 2000; 200 (2): 120‐123

Non‐randomised trial

11

Kocygit A, Gur S, Gurel MS, Bulut V, Ulukanligil M

Antimonial therapy induces circulating pro inflammatory cytokines in participants with cutaneous leishmaniasis

IAI 2002; 70 (12): 6589‐6591

Non‐randomised trial

52

Livshin R, Weinrauch L, Even‐Paz Z, El‐On J

Efficacy of rifampicin and isoniazid in cutaneous leishmaniasis

Int J Dermatol 1987; 26 (1): 55‐9

Non‐randomised trial

39

Meymandi S, Holmes D, Crawford RI

Comparative study of the efficacy of combined imiquimod (Aldara T) 5% cream and intralesional meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime)

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2005; 19 (2): 38

Non‐randomised trial

99

Ozgostasi O, Kirtak N, Erbagci Z

Cryotherapy in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis

J Dermatol Treat 1997; 8: 179‐182

Non‐randomised trial

64

Pareek SS

Combination therapy of sodium stibogluconate and rifampicin in cutaneous leishmaniasis

Int J Dermatol 1984; 23(1): 70‐1

Non‐randomised trial

32

Sharquie KE, Al‐Hamamy H, El‐Yassin D

Treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis by direct current electrotherapy: the baghdadin device

J Dermatol 1998; 25: 234‐237

Non‐randomised trial

69

Vardy D, Barenholz Y, Cohen R, Zvulunov A, Biton A, Klaus S, Frankenburg S

Topical amphotericin B for cutaneous leishmaniasis

Arch Dermatol 1999; 135 (7): 856‐857

Non‐randomised trial

13

Vardy D, Barenholz Y, Naftoliev N, Kaus S, Gilead L, Frankenburg S

Efficacious topical treatment for human cutaneous leishmaniasis with ethanolic lipid amphotericin B

Trans R Soc Trop Med & Hyg 2001; 95: 184‐186

Non‐randomised trial (but single‐blinded for the participant)

19

Radmanesh M, Falahzadeh A, Dowraghi HF

Weekly versus every 3 days intralesional meglumine antimoniate therapy for cutaneous leishmaniasis

J Dermatolog Treat 1998; 9(4): 231‐233

Non‐randomised trial

70

Mapar MA, Kavoosi H, Dabbagh MA

Assessment of the effect of topical opium in treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis

Iranian J Dermatol 2001; 4(4): 23‐28.

Non‐randomised trial

96

Seeberger J, Daoud S, Pammer J

Transient effect of topical treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with imiquimod.

Int J Dermatol. 2003;42(7): 576‐9

Non‐randomised trial

15

Bahamdan KA, Tallab TM, Johargi H, Nourad MM, Ibrahim K, el Sherbini AH, Karkashan E, Khare AK, Nauri MM

Terbinafine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis: a pilot study

Int J Dermatol. 1997; 36(1): 59‐60

Uncontrolled

27

Morizot G, Delgiudice P, Caumes E, Laffitte E, Marty P, Dupuy A, Sarfati C, Hadj‐Rabia S, Darie H, LE Guern AS, Salah AB, Pratlong F, Dedet JP, Grogl M, Buffet PA

Healing of Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis in travelers treated with fluconazole: drug effect or spontaneous evolution?

Am J Trop Med & Hyg 2007; 76(1): 48‐52

Uncontrolled

35

Leibovici V, Aram H

Cryotherapy in acute cutaneous leishmaniasis

Int J Dermatol. 1986;25(7): 473‐5

Uncontrolled

14

Aram H, Leibovici V

Ultrasound‐induced hyperthermia in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis

Cutis. 1987;40(4): 350‐3

Uncontrolled

18

Junaid AJ

Treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with infrared heat

Int J Dermatol. 1986;25(7): 470‐2

Uncontrolled

178

Faris RM, Jarallah JS, Khoja TA, al‐Yamani MJ

Intralesional treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with sodium stibogluconate antimony

Int J Dermatol. 1993;32(8): 610‐2

Uncontrolled

710

Joshi RK, Nambiar PM

Dermal leishmaniasis and rifampicin

Int J Dermatol. 1989;28(9): 612‐4

Uncontrolled

15

Abahusein A, Larbi EB, al‐Khawajah A, al‐Gindan Y, Jain S

Evaluation of topical ketoconazole in cutaneous leishmaniasis

East Afr Med J. 1992;69(1): 14‐7

Uncontrolled

10

Sharquie KE, Al‐Talib KK, Chu C

Intralesional therapy of cutaneous leishmaniasis with sodium stibogluconate antimony

Br J Dermatol 1988; 119: 53‐57.

Non‐randomised trial

60

Van den Enden E, Van Gompel A, Stevens A, Vandeghinste N, Le Ray D, Gigase P, De Beule K, Van den Ende J

Treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with oral itraconazole

Int J Dermatol 1994; 33(4): 285‐286.

Uncontrolled

22

Tallab TM, Bahamdam KA, Mirdad S, Johargi H, Mourad MM, Ibrahim K, el Sherbini
AH, Karkashan E, Khare AK, Jamal A

Cutaneous leishmaniasis: schedules for intralesional treatment with sodium stibogluconate

Int J Dermatol 1996; 35(8): 594‐597.

Uncontrolled

96

Jabbar A, Junaid N

Treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with infrared heat

Int J Dermatol 1986; 25(7): 470‐472.

Uncontrolled

178

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Quasi‐randomised, non‐randomised or uncontrolled studies
Comparison 1. ILMA weekly versus ILMA fortnightly for up to 8 weeks; FU: 2 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. ILMA weekly versus ILMA fortnightly for up to 8 weeks; FU: 2 months
Comparison 2. IL SSG versus IM SSG in L. tropica; FU: 2 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. IL SSG versus IM SSG in L. tropica; FU: 2 months
Comparison 3. Itraconazole (200 mg for 6 to 8 weeks) versus placebo; FU: 2 to 3 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 in L. major infections

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 In L. tropica infections

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 in both species

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Parasitological cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Itraconazole (200 mg for 6 to 8 weeks) versus placebo; FU: 2 to 3 months
Comparison 4. Fluconazole (200mg for 6 weeks) versus placebo in L.major; FU: 3 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Fluconazole (200mg for 6 weeks) versus placebo in L.major; FU: 3 months
Comparison 5. Oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg/d TD for 4 to 6 weeks versus placebo; FU: 3 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg/d TD for 4 to 6 weeks versus placebo; FU: 3 months
Comparison 6. IMMA plus oral pentoxifylline versus IMMA plus placebo for 20 days in L. major; FU: 3 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. IMMA plus oral pentoxifylline versus IMMA plus placebo for 20 days in L. major; FU: 3 months
Comparison 7. Oral miltefosine for 28 days versus IMMA for 14 days in L. major; FU: 3 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. Oral miltefosine for 28 days versus IMMA for 14 days in L. major; FU: 3 months
Comparison 8. Paromomycin (15% + 10% urea twice daily for 14 days) versus placebo (twice daily for 14 days) mainly in L. major; FU: 2.5 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

2

383

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.86, 1.17]

2 Parasitological cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 8. Paromomycin (15% + 10% urea twice daily for 14 days) versus placebo (twice daily for 14 days) mainly in L. major; FU: 2.5 months
Comparison 9. Paromomycin (15% + 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus placebo (twice daily for 28 days) in L. major; FU: 2 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Prevention of scarring Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 Parasitological cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 9. Paromomycin (15% + 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus placebo (twice daily for 28 days) in L. major; FU: 2 months
Comparison 10. Paromomycin (15%+ 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) in L. major; FU: 2 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Prevention of scarring Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 Parasitological cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 10. Paromomycin (15%+ 12% MBCL twice daily x 28 days) versus PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) in L. major; FU: 2 months
Comparison 11. Paromomycin (4 weeks) versus paromomycin (2 weeks) + placebo (2 weeks) in L. major; FU: 2.5 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Parasitological cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 11. Paromomycin (4 weeks) versus paromomycin (2 weeks) + placebo (2 weeks) in L. major; FU: 2.5 months
Comparison 12. Imiquimod (5% 3 times/week x 28 d) + IMMA (20 mg/kg/d x 14 d) versus placebo + i.m. MA in L.tropica; FU: 3.5 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 12. Imiquimod (5% 3 times/week x 28 d) + IMMA (20 mg/kg/d x 14 d) versus placebo + i.m. MA in L.tropica; FU: 3.5 months
Comparison 13. PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) versus placebo in L. major: FU: 2.5 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Prevention of scarring Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 Parasitological cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 13. PDT (weekly for 4 weeks) versus placebo in L. major: FU: 2.5 months
Comparison 14. Heat versus ILMA once a week for 4 weeks: FU: 6 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Lesions

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Participants

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 14. Heat versus ILMA once a week for 4 weeks: FU: 6 months
Comparison 15. Thermotherapy versus IM and IL SSG in L. tropica; FU: 2 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Thermotherapy versus IM SSG

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Thermotherapy versus IL SSG

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 15. Thermotherapy versus IM and IL SSG in L. tropica; FU: 2 months
Comparison 16. Topical honey plus ILMA versus ILMA ; FU: 2.5 to 3 months

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete cure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 16. Topical honey plus ILMA versus ILMA ; FU: 2.5 to 3 months