Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Antibióticos para la tos productiva prolongada en niños

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

Referencias de los estudios incluidos en esta revisión

Darelid 1993 {published and unpublished data}

Darelid J, Lofgren S, Malmvall B‐E. Erythromycin treatment is beneficial for longstanding moraxella catarrhalis associated cough in children. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 1993;25:323‐9.

Gottfarb 1994 {published data only}

Gottfarb P, Brauner A. Children with persistent cough ‐ outcome with treatment and role of moraxella catarrhalis?. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 1994;26:545‐1.

Referencias de los estudios excluidos de esta revisión

Dowell 1998 {published data only}

Dowell SF, Schwartz B, Phillips WR. Appropriate use of antibiotics for URIs in children: Part II. Cough, pharyngitis and the common cold. The pediatric URI consensus team. American Family Physician 1998;58(6):1335‐42.

Field 1966 {published data only}

Field CM, Connolly JH, Murtagh G, Slattery CM, Turkington EE. Antibiotic treatment of epidemic bronchiolitis‐‐a double‐blind trial. British Medical Journal 1966;5479:83‐5.

Fiocchi 1988 {published data only}

Fiocchi A, Grasso U, Zuccotti G, Arancio R, Riva E, Giovannini M. Domiodol treatment for bronchopulmonary diseases in the paediatric age group: a double‐blind controlled clinical trial versus placebo. Journal of International Medical Research 1988;16:31‐8.

Friis 1984 {published data only}

Friis B, Andersen P, Brenoe E, Hornsleth A, Jensen A, Knudsen FU, et al. Antibiotic treatment of pneumonia and bronchiolitis. A prospective randomised study. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1984;59(11):1038‐45.

Nevihostenyi 1980 {published data only}

Nevihostenyi G, Lellei I, Frank K, Istok M. Evaluation of antibiotic therapy and immunotherapy in chronic childhood bronchitis, based on endoscopic follow up examinations. Orvosi Hetilap 1980;121(51):3125‐30.

O'Brien 1998 {published data only}

O'Brien KL, Dowell SF, Schwartz B, Marcy SM, Phillips WR, Gerber MA. Cough illness/bronchitis ‐ principles of judicious use of antimicrobial agents. Pediatrics 1998;101(1 II Suppl):178‐81.

Schaad 1986 {published data only}

Schaad UB, Farine JC, Fux T. Prospective placebo‐controlled double‐blind study using a bacterial lysate in infections of the respiratory tract and ENT region in children. Helvetica Paediatrica Acta 1986;41(1‐2):7‐17.

Shann 1985 {published data only}

Shann F. Children with cough: who needs antibiotic therapy, and who needs admission to hospital?. Indian Journal of Pediatrics 1985;52(417):343‐8.

Stott 1976 {published data only}

Stott NC, West RR. Randomised controlled trial of antibiotics in patients with cough and purulent sputum. British Medical Journal 1976;2(6035):556‐9.

Taylor 1977 {published data only}

Taylor B, Abbott GD, Kerr MM, Fergusson DM. Amoxycillin and co‐trimoxazole in presumed viral respiratory infections of childhood: placebo‐controlled trial. British Medical Journal 1977;2(6086):552‐4.

Wald 1986 {published data only}

Wald ER, Chiponis D, Ledesma‐Medina J. Comparative effectiveness of amoxicillin and amoxicillin‐clavulanate potassium in acute paranasal sinus infections in children: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Pediatrics 1986;77(6):795‐800.

Yun 1983 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Yun DJ, Hong CH, Oh KK. Chronic cough and sinusitis in children: the role of antimicrobials. Yonsei Medical Journal 1983;24(1):67‐75.

Referencias de los estudios en curso

Marchant {unpublished data only}

Marchant JM, Taylor SM, Gaffney J, Masters IB, Chang AB. Randomised controlled double‐blinded trial of antibiotics in patients with chronic moist cough.

Alvarez‐Elcoro 1999

Alvarez‐Elcoro S, Enzler MJ. The macrolides: erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 1999;74(6):613‐34.

Arroll 2005

Arroll B, Kenealy T. Antibiotics for the common cold and acute purulent rhinitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000247.pub2]

Britt 2004

Britt H, Miller GC, Knox S, Charles J, Valenti L, Henderson J, et al. General practice activity in Australia 2001‐02 (AIHW Cat. No. GEP‐10). Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (General Practice Series No. 10), 2002.

Cates 2003 [Computer program]

Cates C. Visual Rx. Online NNT Calculator.. http://www.nntonline.net/: Cates C, 2003.

Chang 1998

Chang AB, Newman RG, Carlin J, Phelan PD, Robertson CF. Subjective scoring of cough in children: parent‐completed vs child‐completed diary cards vs an objective method. European Respiratory Journal 1998;11:462‐6.

Chang 2001

Chang AB, Asher MI. A review of cough in children. Journal of Asthma 2001;38(4):299‐309.

Chang 2003

Chang AB. Causes of cough, assessment and measurement in children. In: Widdicombe JG, Chung F, Boushey H editor(s). Cough: Mechanisms, Causes and Therapy. Blackwell Science, 2003.

Chang 2005

Chang AB, Gaffney JT, Eastburn MM, Faoagali J, Cox N, Masters IB. Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings. Respiratory Research 2005;6(1):3.

Fahey 2004

Fahey T, Smucny J, Becker L, Glazier R. Antibiotics for acute bronchitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000245.pub2.]

Fitch 2000

Fitch PS, Brown V, Chock BC, Taylor R, Ennis M, Shields MD. Chronic cough in children: bronchoalveolar lavage findings. European Respiratory Journal 2000;16:1109‐14.

Gazi 2004

Gazi H, Kurutepe S, Surucuoglu S, Teker A, Ozbakkaloglu B. Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial pathogens in the oropharynx of healthy school children in Turkey. Indian Journal of Medical Research 2004;120(5):489‐95.

Gibson 2001

Gibson PG, Simpson JL, Chalmers AC. Airway eosinophilia is associated with wheeze but is uncommon in children with persistent cough and frequent chest colds. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2001;164:977‐81.

Hay 2002

Hay AD, Wilson AD. The natural history of acute cough in children aged 0 to 4 years in primary care: a systematic review. British Journal of General Practice 2002;52(478):401‐9.

Jadad 1996

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17(1):1‐12.

Kemp 1997

Kemp CA, McDowell JM. Paediatric Pharmacopoeia. Pharmacy Department, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia, 1997.

Kogan 1994

Kogan MD, Pappas G, Yu SM, Kotelchuck M. Over‐the‐counter medication use among preschool‐age children. JAMA 1994;272:1025‐30.

Leonardi 2002

Leonardi GS, Houthuijs D, Nikiforov B, Volf J, Rudnai P, Zejda J, et al. Respiratory symptoms, bronchitis and asthma in children of Central and Eastern Europe. European Respiratory Journal 2002;20(4):890‐98.

Marchant JM 2003

Marchant JM, Masters IB, Chang AB. Chronic cough in children ‐ understanding the spectrum of disease. European Respiratory Journal 2003;22(Suppl 45):176S.

Marchant JM 2004

Marchant JM, Masters IB, Chang AB. Defining Paediatric Chronic Bacterial Bronchitis. Respirology 2004;9(S2):A61.

Morice 2002

Morice AH. Epidemiology of cough. Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2002;15(3):253‐9.

Spee‐van 1998

Spee‐van der Wekke J, Meulmeester JF, Radder JJ, Verloove‐Vanhorick SP. School absence and treatment in school children with respiratory symptoms in The Netherlands: data from the Child Health Monitoring System. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1998;52(6):359‐63.

Yun 1983

Yun DJ, Hong CH, Oh KK. Chronic cough and sinusitis in children: The role of antimicrobials. Yonsei Medical Journal 1983;24(1):67‐75.

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Darelid 1993

Methods

Open randomised study comparing erythromycin and no treatment (as control group). At baseline patients had a history and clinical examination performed. A nasopharyngeal swab was obtained at baseline and again 18‐36 hours after last antibiotic dose. A repeat doctors examination was performed on Day 8.

Randomisation was open and done by a computer‐generated table. No other information given about randomisation. Allocation concealment was not done (grade C). Not blinded due to open design of study (quality assessment grade D). Compliance monitoring not described.

Dropouts: n=1 (1.1% of patients randomised) from treatment group from adverse effects of antibiotics. No further description given and was not included in analysis as treatment failures. Quality assessment of reporting of participants and follow‐up of patients therefore were of a high quality (A).

Participants

88 children with cough >10 days duration were included. The number of participants with cough > 3 weeks duration was 50%. Approximately 75% of the participants had moist cough.
Erthromycin group: n=41 Control group n=47 . There were no significant differences in any patient characteristics between the 2 groups.

Inclusion criteria: Children aged 0.5 ‐ 6 years attending one of 3 paediatric outpatient clinics with greater than 10 days of cough.

Exclusion criteria: Children with allergy, asthma, cardiac disease, otitis media, tonsillitis, pneumonia or clinically suspected pertussis.

Interventions

Treatment group received erythromycin ethylsuccinate suspension 50mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses for 7 days verus 'no treatment' control group. All children received nose drops (oxymetazoline chloride). Salbutamol mixture (0.1mg/kg/day) was allowed in both groups and was registered.

Outcomes

1. Clinical symptoms as recorded on a questionnaire by parents, including cough on 3 point scale (none,moderate or frequent), morning temperature and degree of activity of child (usual, reduced, bedridden).
2. Doctor performed clinical examination on Day 8 to assess cure or clinical failure (without knowledge of questionnaires).
3. Elimination of nasopharyngeal pathogens
4. Progression of disease requiring additional antibiotics (% complications) ie bacterial complications requiring further antibiotics and recurrent symptoms were recorded during therapy and for 3 months after.
5. Adverse drug reactions

Notes

4 children in each arm had received antibiotic treatment prior to enrolment for <30 days.

Quality Score: CDAA

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Computer‐generated table

Allocation concealment?

High risk

Open

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Open study

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Only one patient withdrew from the study.

Gottfarb 1994

Methods

Randomised double blind study comparing Amoxycillin/clavulanic acid vs placebo. At baseline clinical data was obtained and participants underwent nasopharyngeal aspirate and blood tests for B.pertussis and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. A cough scoring system which combined number of coughing attacks per 24 hours, coughing attacks associated with vomiting and wheeze or crackles on auscultation was obtained. At 2 weeks participants were followed‐up with repeat blood tests, nasopharyngeal aspirates and doctor assessment of clinical outcome. Parental assessment of treatment efficacy was also recorded. Number of coughing attacks per 24 hours was recorded for each day of treatment.

Randomisation method was not described. Allocation method was not described. Compliance monitoring was not described. Although a double‐blinded study there was no mention of how this was achieved in the paper.

Dropouts n=15 (26.3% of those recruited). 12 with pertussis, 2 failed to return to follow‐up visit, 1 refused medication. These were not further described and not included as treatment failures in the paper.

Participants

52 children with cough >10 days duration were included. The mean duration of cough was 3‐4 weeks. Number with moist cough was not reported.
Median age of groups: Amoxycillin/clavulanic acid 2.7 years; Placebo 2.6 years (Numbers in each group not described).There was no significant differences in any patient characteristics between the two groups.

Inclusion criteria: Children aged 0.6‐7 years with > 10 days of cough and > 7 points on cough score system.

Exclusion criteria: Children with any signs of pneumonia, acute otitis media or clinical suspicion of Bordetella pertussis infection.

Interventions

Treatment group received amoxycillin/clavulanic acid 20mg/kg/day for 7 days verus placebo group.
The children were not given any antitussive medication.

Outcomes

1. Paediatrician's assessment of clinical recovery on day 12‐14.
2. Parental assessment of recovery on Day 12‐14.
3. Number of coughing attacks each day of treatment recorded until day 8
4. Adverse events

Notes

Due to lack of information in the paper and an inability to obtain data from authors about the dropouts with pertussis, it was assumed that there were equal numbers of patients in each treatment group analysed. (37 patients became 18 each group)

Quality Score: BACD

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Not described

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical placebo

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

26% attrition not included in final analysis

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Dowell 1998

Review article on use of antibiotics for cough, pharyngitis and the common cold.

Field 1966

Double blind RCT of ampicillin versus placebo in infants with cough and expiratory wheeze (bronchiolitis). Excluded from review as all patients had wheeze ‐ an exclusion criteria in our patients.

Fiocchi 1988

RCT of Domiodol versus placebo in children. Excluded as domiodol is a mucolytic not antibiotic.

Friis 1984

Open randomised prospective trial of antibiotic versus control group in children with pneumonia. All had been unwell for < 1 week. Excluded as acute cough not chronic.

Nevihostenyi 1980

Non RCT. Study of 129 children aged 2 ‐ 8 years who underwent endoscopy for investigation of chronic bronchitis.

O'Brien 1998

Review article on the investigation and treatment of (including use of antibiotics) in children with acute, subacute and chronic cough.

Schaad 1986

Double blind RCT of bacterial lysate vs placebo in acute infections respiratory system therefore excluded as not antibiotic and not chronic infections.

Shann 1985

Non RCT. Review article on treatment of pneumonia.

Stott 1976

RCT of doxycycline versus placebo in adults with acute cough of <= 1 weeks duration. Excluded as adults and acute cough.

Taylor 1977

Double blind RCT of amoxycillin, co‐trimoxazle and placebo in children with viral respiratory illnesses. Excluded as not chronic cough.

Wald 1986

Excluded as cough due to acute sinusitis (that is not non‐specific cough) and cough not chronic (<30 days). Double‐blind RCT of amoxycillin, amoxycillin‐clavulanate potassium and placebo in 171 children aged 2‐16 years with persistent nasal discharge and/or cough. Children receiving antibiotic more likely to be cured then those receiving placebo (p<0.05 at ten days).

Yun 1983

RCT of antibiotics for sinusitis in children presenting with chronic cough. Excluded because no placebo or "no treatment" control group. The non‐antibiotic group was given expectorants and decongestants which is not an appropriate control/placebo group. There was also no information given on nature of cough, moist or dry. It did however precisely defined "clinical cure" as no cough on day 14 of treatment. The results did suggest benefit with antibiotics in keeping with our results with the difference between the antibiotic( treatment event rate for cure 46%) and expectorant/decongestant group ( control cure rate 14%) which was statistically significant (p<0.001).

Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID]

Marchant

Trial name or title

Randomised controlled double‐blinded trial of antibiotics in patients with chronic moist cough

Methods

Participants

Children aged 6 months ‐ 14 years with chronic (>3 week duration) moist cough.
Exclusion criteria: Clinical or HRCT‐proven bronchiectasis, gross neurodevelopmental delay, cystic fibrosis, known chronic disease such as interstitial lung disease or cardiac disease. Also children who have had antibiotic therapy in the preceding 2 weeks or who are allergic to penicillin will be excluded.

Interventions

Randomisation stratified by age <6 years or > 6 years. Allocated blindly to Augmentin Duo Suspension 400mg/5ml or placebo at dose 22.5mg/kg twice daily for 14 days. Enrolled children will complete cough diary cards for 5 days pre intervention and total of 4 weeks after intervention. Bronchoscopy and lavage will take place on day 0 in a number of children.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome: Assessment of cough scores ‐ pre treatment, immediately prior to treatment and at conclusion of treatment. Bronchoalveolar lavage results in responders and non‐responders will also be compared including cytology, microbiology and inflammatory markers.

Starting date

January 2004

Contact information

Dr Julie M Marchant
Respiratory Fellow
Dept. of Respiratory Medicine
Royal Children's Hospital
Herston Road
Brisbane
Qld AUSTRALIA
4006
Telephone 1: 61 7 36368523
Telephone 2: 61 7 36368111
Facsimile: 61 7 36361958
E‐mail: [email protected]

Notes

Study continuing but recruitment slow. Results likely available late 2008.

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Clinical failure

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (using 'intention to treat' analysis) Show forest plot

2

140

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.06, 0.31]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Clinical failure, Outcome 1 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (using 'intention to treat' analysis).

Comparison 1 Clinical failure, Outcome 1 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (using 'intention to treat' analysis).

2 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (excluding those known to have B.Pertussis) Show forest plot

2

128

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.05, 0.30]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Clinical failure, Outcome 2 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (excluding those known to have B.Pertussis).

Comparison 1 Clinical failure, Outcome 2 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (excluding those known to have B.Pertussis).

3 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (using available data only) Show forest plot

2

124

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.05, 0.29]

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Clinical failure, Outcome 3 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (using available data only).

Comparison 1 Clinical failure, Outcome 3 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (using available data only).

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Illness progression

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with progression of disease resulting in additional medical therapy required Show forest plot

2

125

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [0.03, 0.34]

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Illness progression, Outcome 1 Participants with progression of disease resulting in additional medical therapy required.

Comparison 2 Illness progression, Outcome 1 Participants with progression of disease resulting in additional medical therapy required.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. Adverse events (reaction to medications)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Reaction to medications (vomiting, diarrhoea, rash) Show forest plot

2

128

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.31, 6.08]

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Adverse events (reaction to medications), Outcome 1 Reaction to medications (vomiting, diarrhoea, rash).

Comparison 3 Adverse events (reaction to medications), Outcome 1 Reaction to medications (vomiting, diarrhoea, rash).

Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up

Comparison 1 Clinical failure, Outcome 1 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (using 'intention to treat' analysis).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Clinical failure, Outcome 1 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (using 'intention to treat' analysis).

Comparison 1 Clinical failure, Outcome 2 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (excluding those known to have B.Pertussis).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Clinical failure, Outcome 2 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (excluding those known to have B.Pertussis).

Comparison 1 Clinical failure, Outcome 3 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (using available data only).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Clinical failure, Outcome 3 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (using available data only).

Comparison 2 Illness progression, Outcome 1 Participants with progression of disease resulting in additional medical therapy required.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Illness progression, Outcome 1 Participants with progression of disease resulting in additional medical therapy required.

Comparison 3 Adverse events (reaction to medications), Outcome 1 Reaction to medications (vomiting, diarrhoea, rash).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Adverse events (reaction to medications), Outcome 1 Reaction to medications (vomiting, diarrhoea, rash).

Comparison 1. Clinical failure

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (using 'intention to treat' analysis) Show forest plot

2

140

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.06, 0.31]

2 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (excluding those known to have B.Pertussis) Show forest plot

2

128

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.05, 0.30]

3 Children not cured or substantially improved at follow‐up (using available data only) Show forest plot

2

124

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.05, 0.29]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Clinical failure
Comparison 2. Illness progression

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with progression of disease resulting in additional medical therapy required Show forest plot

2

125

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [0.03, 0.34]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Illness progression
Comparison 3. Adverse events (reaction to medications)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Reaction to medications (vomiting, diarrhoea, rash) Show forest plot

2

128

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.31, 6.08]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Adverse events (reaction to medications)