Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Fluoroquinolonas para el tratamiento de la tuberculosis

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

Burman 2006 {published data only}

Burman WJ, Goldberg S, Johnson JL, Muzanye G, Engle M, Mosher AW, et al. Moxifloxacin versus ethambutol in the first 2 months of treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 2006;174(3):331‐8.

El‐Sadr 1998 {published data only}

El‐Sadr WM, Perlman DC, Matts JP, Nelson ET, Cohn DL, Salomon N, et al. Evaluation of an intensive intermittent‐induction regimen and duration of short‐course treatment for human immunodeficiency virus‐related pulmonary tuberculosis. Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA) and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG). Clinical Infectious Diseases 1998;26(5):1148‐58.

Huang 2000 {published data only}

Huang CS, Wu CC. Observation of the clinical efficacy of sparfloxacin in the treatment of multiple drug resistance pneumonial tuberculosis. Chinese Journal of Antibiotics 2000;25(4):302‐3.

Ji 2001 {published data only}

Ji YM, Dong LH, Wang Q, Yu WQ. Short‐term observating of curative effects in treatment of multiple‐drug resistance pulmonary tuberculosis with sparfloxacin and ofloxacin. Journal of Postgraduates of Medicines 2001;24(7):32‐3.

Kennedy 1993 {published data only}

Kennedy N, Fox R, Uiso L, Ngowi FI, Gillespie SH. Safety profile of ciprofloxacin during long‐term therapy for pulmonary tuberculosis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1993;32(6):897‐902.

Kennedy 1996 {published data only}

Kennedy N, Berger L, Curram J, Fox R, Gutmann J, Kisyombe GM, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a drug regimen that includes ciprofloxacin for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 1996;22(5):827‐33.
Kennedy N, Fox R, Kisyombe GM, Saruni AO, Uiso LO, Ramsay AR, et al. Early bactericidal and sterilizing activities of ciprofloxacin in pulmonary tuberculosis. American Review of Respiratory Disease 1993;148(6 Pt 1):1547‐51.

Kohno 1992 {published data only}

Kohno S, Koga H, Kaku M, Maesaki S, Hara K. Prospective comparative study of ofloxacin or ethambutol for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest 1992;102(6):1815‐8.

Lu 2000 {published data only}

Lu Y, Zhu L, Duan L. Antituberculosis effect of levofloxacin. Zhonghua Jiehe He Huxi Zazhi [Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases] 2000;23(1):50‐4.

Mohanty 1993 {published data only}

Mohanty KC, Dhamgaye TM. Controlled trial of ciprofloxacin in short‐term chemotherapy for pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest 1993;104(4):1194‐8.

Saigal 2001 {published data only}

Saigal S, Agarwal SR, Nandeesh HP, Sarin SK. Safety of an ofloxacin‐based antitubercular regimen for the treatment of tuberculosis in patients with underlying chronic liver disease: a preliminary report. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2001;16(9):1028‐32.

Sun 2000 {published data only}

Sun W, Wenyi C, Cunzhi L, Yanhong Y, Yuzhen X, Zhaosheng S. A randomized controlled study of sparfloxacin and ofloxacin in the treatment of multiple drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Chinese Journal of Antibiotics 2000;25(1):52‐4.

Andries 2005 {published data only}

Andries K, Verhasselt P, Guillemont J, Gohlmann HW, Neefs LM, Winkler H, et al. A diarylquinoline drug active on the ATP synthase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 2005;307(5707):223‐7.

Anonymous 1997 {published data only}

Anonymous. A controlled study of rifabutin and an uncontrolled study of ofloxacin in the retreatment of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis resistant to isoniazid, streptomycin and rifampicin. Hong Kong Chest Service/British Medical Research Council. Tubercle and Lung Disease 1997;73(1):59‐67.

Chambers 1998 {published data only}

Chambers HF, Kocagoz T, Sipit T, Turner J, Hopewell PC. Activity of amoxicillin/clavulanate in patients with tuberculosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 1998;26(4):874‐7.

Chen 2003 {published data only}

Chen QL, Chen L, Yin JJ. A study on the clinical efficacy of a combination regimen with levofloxacin and capreomycin in the treatment of multi‐drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Zhonghua Jiehe He Huxi Zazhi [Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases] 2003;26(8):454‐7.

Chukanov 2006 {published data only}

Chukanov VI, Komissarova OG, Maishin VI, Abdullaev RI, Kononets AS. Efficiency of a new standard chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of patients with recurrent pulmonary tuberculosis. Problemy Tuberculeza I Boleznej Legkih 2006, (8):9‐13.

Estebanez 1992 {published data only}

Estebanez Zarranz MJ, Martinez‐Sagarra JM, Alberte A, Amon Sesmero J, Rodriguez Toves A. Treatment of urogenital tuberculosis with ofloxacin. Preliminary study. Actas Urologicas Espanolas 1992;16(1):64‐8.

Gosling 2003 {published data only}

Gosling RD, Uiso LO, Sam NE, Bongard E, Kanduma EG, Nyindo M, et al. The bactericidal activity of moxifloxacin in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2003;168(11):1342‐5.

Grishin 1998 {published data only}

Grishin VK, Polunina TE. Lomefloxacin in phthisiatric practice. Antibiotiki i Khimioterapiia 1998;43(10):17‐8.

Johnson 2006 {published data only}

Johnson JL, Hadad DJ, Boom WH, Daley CL, Peloquin CA, Eisenach KD, et al. Early and extended early bactericidal activity of levofloxacin, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin in pulmonary tuberculosis. International Journal of Tuberculosis & Lung Disease 2006;10(6):605‐12.

Kawahara 1992 {published data only}

Kawahara S, Eirei J. Evaluation of new antitubercular agents‐‐new quinolone agents. Kekkaku 1992;67(10):679‐82.

Kumar 2004 {published data only}

Kumar AK, Gurumurthy P. Disposition of uric acid upon administration of ofloxacin alone and in combination with other anti‐tuberculosis drugs. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 2004;42(3):323‐5.

Marra 2005 {published data only}

Marra F, Marra CA, Moadebi S, Shi P, Elwood RK, Stark G, et al. Levofloxacin treatment of active tuberculosis and the risk of adverse events. Chest 2005;128(3):1406‐13.

O'Brien 1994 {published data only}

O'Brien RJ, Nunn PP. Ciprofloxacin is not a component of first‐line TB. Chest 1994;106(4):1312.

Pletz 2004 {published data only}

Pletz MW, De Roux A, Roth A, Neumann KH, Mauch H, Lode H. Early bactericidal activity of moxifloxacin in treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: a prospective, randomized study. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2004;48(3):780‐2.

Sirgel 1997 {published data only}

Sirgel FA, Botha FJ, Parkin DP, Van de Wal BW, Schall R, Donald PR, et al. The early bactericidal activity of ciprofloxacin in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1997;156(3 Pt 1):901‐5.

Sirgel 2000 {published data only}

Sirgel FA, Donald PR, Odhiambo J, Githui W, Umapathy KC, Paramasivan CN, et al. A multicentre study of the early bactericidal activity of anti‐tuberculosis drugs. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2000;45(6):859‐70.

Sokolova 1998 {published data only}

Sokolova GB, Kunichan AD, Koriakin VA, Lazareva IaV. Lomefloxacin in complex treatment of acute progressive form of pulmonary tuberculosis. Antibiotiki i Khimioterapiia 1998;43(10):10‐2.

Suo 1996 {published data only}

Suo J, Yu MC, Lee CN, Chiang CY, Lin TP. Treatment of multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis in Taiwan. Chemotherapy 1996;42 Suppl 3:20‐3.

TRC 2002 {published data only}

Tuberculosis Research Centre (Indian Council of Medical Research), Chennei. Shortening short course chemotherapy: a randomized clinical trial for treatment of smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis with regimens using ofloxacin in the intensive phase. Indian Journal of Tuberculosis 2002;49(1):27‐38.

Valerio 2003 {published data only}

Valerio G, Bracciale P, Manisco V, Quitadamo M, Legari G, Bellanova S. Long‐term tolerance and effectiveness of moxifloxacin therapy for tuberculosis: preliminary results. Journal of Chemotherapy 2003;15(1):66‐70.

Venter 2006 {published data only}

Venter WDF, Panz VR, Feldman Ch, Joffe BI. Adrenocortical function in hospitalised patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis receiving a rifampicin‐based regimen ‐ a pilot study. South African Medical Journal 2006;96(1):62‐6.

Wang 2006 {published data only}

Wang JY, Hsueh PR, Jan IS, Lee LN, Liaw YS, Yang PC, et al. Empirical treatment with a fluoroquinolone delays the treatment for tuberculosis and is associated with a poor prognosis in endemic areas. Thorax 2006;61(10):903‐8.

Yoon 2005 {published data only}

Yoon YS, Lee HI, Yoon HI, Yoo CG, Kim YW, Han SK, et al. Impact of fluoroquinolones on the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis initially treated as bacterial pneumonia. International Journal of Tuberculosis & Lung Disease 2005;9(11):1215‐9.

Zhang 1997 {published data only}

Zhang Y, Qian H, Chen M. Bronchofiberscope and catheter intervention in treatment of multi‐drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Zhonghua Jiehe He Huxi Zazhi [Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases] 1997;20(6):354‐7.

Zhang 2006 {published data only}

Zhang X, Li M, Hu CM, Yu J, Lin FS, Mao KJ, et al. Clinic assessment of rifabutin in the treatment of multidrug‐resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Chinese Journal of Antibiotics 2006;31(4):223‐4+242.

Zhao 2003 {published data only}

Zhao RZ, Wang QM, Zhang PC, Zhang HM. Therapeutic effects of levofloxacin‐containing regimen in patients with retreated pulmonary tuberculosis. Chinese Journal of Antibiotics 2003;28(8):497‐9.

Zheng 2004 {published data only}

Zheng XM, Li SM, Xing BC. Short‐term effect of treatment protocol utilizing levofloxacin, pasiniazide and M.Vaccae on multi‐drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao [Academic Journal of the First Medical College of PLA] 2004;24(5):574‐5.

Zhu 2006 {published data only}

Zhu LZ, Fu Y, Chu NH, Ye ZZ, Xiao HP, Wang W, et al. A controlled clinical trial of long course chemotherapy regimens containing rifabutin in the treatment of multi‐drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases 2006;29(8):520‐3.

Referencias de los estudios en espera de evaluación

Abdullah 1997 {published data only}

Abdullah A, Abu‐Hussein AH, Al‐Akshar M, Abdel R, Ads CH, El Taieb S. Ofloxacin in the treatment of primary drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (PDR‐TB). European Respiratory Journal 1997;10 Suppl:25214.

Abdullah 1998 {published data only}

Abdullah A, Hussein A, Al‐Akshar M, Ads CH, El‐Taieb S. Ofloxacin dosage in the treatment of multidrug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (MDR‐TB). European Respiratory Journal 1998;12 Suppl:28367.

ISRCTN07062956 {published data only}

ISRCTN 07062956. A randomised comparison of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and gatifloxacin for the treatment of adults with tuberculous meningitis. www.controlled‐trials.com/ISRCTN07062956/07062956 (accessed 27 July 2007).

ISRCTN13670619 {published data only}

ISRCTN13670619. A comparative study of the bactericidal and sterilizing activity of three fluoroquinolones: gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin and ofloxacin substituted for ethambutol in the 2 month initial phase of the standard anti‐tuberculosis treatment regimen also containing rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide (South Africa). www.controlled‐trials.com/ISRCTN13670619/ISRCTN13670619 (accessed 27 July 2007).

ISRCTN44153044 {published data only}

ISRCTN44153044. An international multicentre controlled clinical trial to evaluate high dose RIFApentine and a QUINolone in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. www.controlled‐trials.com/ISRCTN44153044/ISRCTN44153044 (accessed 27 July 2007).

ISRCTN85595810 {published data only}

ISRCTN85595810. Controlled comparison of two moxifloxacin containing treatment shortening regimens in pulmonary tuberculosis. www.controlled‐trials.com/mrct/trial/260713/REMoxTB (accessed 27 July 2007).

NCT00144417 {published data only}

NCT00144417. Evaluation of a moxifloxacin‐based, isoniazid‐sparing regimen for tuberculosis treatment. www.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00144417 (accessed 23 July 2007).

NCT00216385 {published data only}

NCT00216385. A controlled trial of a 4‐month quinolone‐containing regimen for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. clinicaltrials‐nccs.nlm.nih.gov/ct2/show/NCT00216385 (accessed 23 July 2007).

NCT00396084 {published data only}

NCT00396084. Randomized, open label, multiple dose Phase I study of the early bactericidal activity of linezolid, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin in HIV‐non‐infected adults with Initial episodes of sputum smear‐positive pulmonary tuberculosis (DMID 01‐553). clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00396084?order=11 (accessed 27 July 2007).

Alangaden 1997

Alangaden GJ, Lerner SA. The clinical use of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of mycobacterial diseases. Clinical Infectious Diseases 1997;25(5):1213‐21.

Anon 1983

Anonymous. Controlled clinical trial of 4 short‐course regimens of chemotherapy (three 6‐month and one 8‐month) for pulmonary tuberculosis. Tubercle 1983;64(3):153‐66.

Blumberg 2003

Blumberg HM, Burman WJ, Chaisson RE, Daley CL, Etkind SC, Friedman LN, et al. American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America: treatment of tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine 2003;167(4):603‐62.

Burman 1999

Burman WJ, Gallicano K, Peloquin C. Therapeutic implications of drug interactions in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus‐related tuberculosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 1999;28(3):419‐30.

Chan 2004

Chan ED, Laurel V, Strand MJ, Chan JF, Huynh M‐LN, Goble M, et al. Treatment and outcome analysis of 205 patients with multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2004;169(10):1103‐9.

Corbett 2003

Corbett EL, Watt CJ, Walker N, Maher D, Williams BG, Raviglione MC, et al. The growing burden of tuberculosis: global trends and interactions with the HIV epidemic. Archives of Internal Medicine 2003;163(9):1009‐21.

Daley 1992

Daley CL, Small PM, Schecter GF, Schoolnik GK, McAdam RA, Jacobs WR, et al. An outbreak of tuberculosis with accelerated progression among persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. An analysis using restriction‐fragment‐length polymorphisms. New England Journal of Medicine 1992;326(4):231‐5.

El‐Sadr 2001

El‐Sadr WM, Perlman DC, Denning E, Marts JP, Cohn DL. A review of efficacy studies of 6‐month short‐course therapy for tuberculosis among patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus: differences in study outcomes. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2001;32(4):623‐32.

Gillespie 1998

Gillespie SH, Kennedy N. Fluoroquinolones: a new treatment for tuberculosis?. International Journal Tuberculosis Lung Disease 1998;2(4):265‐71.

Ginsburg 2003

Ginsburg AS, Grosset JH, Bishai WR. Fluoroquinolones, tuberculosis, and resistance. Lancet Infectious Diseases 2003;3(7):432‐42.

Grzybowski 1975

Grzybowski S, Barnett GD, Styblo K. Contacts of cases of active pulmonary tuberculosis. Bulletin of the International Union Against Tuberculosis1975; Vol. 50, issue 1:90‐106.

Higgins 2006

Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Highly sensitive search strategies for identifying reports of randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]; Appendix 5b. www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/hbook.htm (accessed 1 July 2007).

Jacobs 1999

Jacobs MR. Activity of quinolones against mycobacteria. Drugs 1999;58 Suppl 2:19‐22.

Jüni 2001

Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001;323(7303):42‐6.

Kochi 1991

Kochi A. The global tuberculosis situation and the new control strategy of the World Health Organization. Tubercle 1991;72(1):1‐6.

Loddenkemper 2002

Loddenkemper R, Sagebiel D, Brendel A. Strategies against multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis. European Respiratory Journal 2002;30 Suppl:66‐77.

Martindale 1996

Reynolds JEF, Parfitt K, Parsons AV, Sweetmann SC, editors. Martindale: the extra pharmacopoeia. 1st Edition. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society, 1996:1881.

Pablos‐Mendez 2002

Pablos‐Mendez A, Gowda DK, Frieden TR. Controlling multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis and access to expensive drugs: a rational framework. Bulletin of the World Health Organization2002; Vol. 80, issue 6:489‐95.

Portaels 1999

Portaels F, Rigouts L, Bastian I. Addressing multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis in penitentiary hospitals and in the general population of the former Soviet Union. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 1999;3(7):582‐8.

Reichman 1996

Reichman LB. Multidrug resistance in the world: the present situation. Chemotherapy 1996;42 Suppl 3:2‐9.

Review Manager 5 [Computer program]

The Nordic Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.0. Copenhagen: The Nordic Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.

Shafer 1995

Shafer RW, Singh SP, Larkin C, Small PM. Exogenous reinfection with multidrug‐resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in an immunocompetent patient. Tubercle and Lung Disease 1995;76(6):575‐7.

STS/BMRC 1981

Anon. Clinical trial of six‐month and four‐month regimens of chemotherapy in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: the results up to 30 months. Tubercule 1981;62(2):95‐102.

Telzak 1999

Telzak EE, Chirgwin KD, Nelson ET, Matts JP, Sepkowitz KA, Benson CA, et al. Predictors for multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis among HIV‐infected patients and response to specific drug regimens. Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA) and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG), National Institutes for Health. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 1999;3(4):337‐43.

Wei 2000

Wei S, Wenyi C, Cunzhi L, Yanhong Y, Yuzhen X, Zhaosheng S. A randomized controlled study of sparfloxacin and ofloxacin in the treatment of multiple drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Chinese Journal of Antibiotics 2000;25(1):53‐5.

WHO 2003

WHO Global Tuberculosis Programme. Treatment of tuberculosis: guidelines for national programmes [WHO/CDS/TB/2003.313]. 3rd Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003:13.

WHO 2006

World Health Organization. Stop TB Dept. Guidelines for the programmatic management of drug‐resistant tuberculosis [WHO/HTM/TB/2006.361]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2006:38‐53.

WHO 2007a

World Health Organization. Stop TB Dept. Global tuberculosis control : surveillance, planning, financing : WHO report 2007 [WHO/HTM/TB/2007.376]. http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/2007/download_centre/en/index.html. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2007 (accessed August 2007).

WHO 2007b

World Health Organization. Fact Sheet No 104: Tuberculosis. www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs104/en/index.html March 2007 (accessed 1 August 2007).

WHO 2007c

World Health Organization. WHO model list of essential medicines: 15th edition, revised March 2007. WHO Drug Information 2007;21(2):95‐111.

Woldehanna 2004

Woldehanna S, Volmink J. Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in HIV infected persons. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000171.pub2]

Yew 2000

Yew WW, Chan CK, Chau CH, Tam CM, Leung CC, Wong PC, et al. Outcomes of patients with multidrug‐resistant pulmonary tuberculosis treated with ofloxacin/levofloxacin‐containing regimens. Chest 2000;117(3):744‐51.

Yew 2001

Yew WW. Clinically significant interactions with drugs used in the treatment of tuberculosis. Drug Safety 2001;25(2):111‐33.

Yew 2003

Yew WW, Chan CK, Leung CC, Chau CH, Tam CM, Wong PC, et al. Comparative roles of levofloxacin and ofloxacin in the treatment of multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis: preliminary results of a retrospective study from Hong Kong. Chest 2003;124(4):1476‐81.

Referencias de otras versiones publicadas de esta revisión

Ziganshina 2005

Ziganshina LE, Vizel AA, Squire SB. Fluoroquinolones for treating tuberculosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004795.pub2]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Burman 2006

Methods

Multicentre randomized controlled trial

Generation of allocation sequence: randomized in a factorial design; continent and pulmonary cavitation are stratification factors

Allocation concealment: unclear

Blinding: unclear

Inclusion of all randomized participants in the final analysis: 59/336 (17.6%) excluded from final analysis

Mean duration of follow up: 8 weeks

Participants

Number: 336 randomized; 277 evaluated

Inclusion criteria: aged 18 years or older with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis and acid‐fast bacilli in an expectorated sputum sample

Exclusion criteria: history of > 7 days of a fluoroquinolone antibiotic or tuberculosis treatment within the previous 6 months; pregnancy or breastfeeding; initial sputum cultures negative for Mycobacterium tuberculosis or resistance to rifampicin, fluoroquinolones, or pyrazinamide (patients whose isolates were resistant to isoniazid were included)

Interventions

Fluoroquinolone (moxifloxacin) substituted into regimen (replacing ethambutol) for 2 months (8 weeks), initial 2 weeks of daily therapy

1. Moxifloxacin (400 mg daily) orally plus basic regimen (5 days a week or thrice a week for both dosing regimens) for 2 months
2. Ethambutol (0.8 g ‐ 40 to 55 kg; 1.2 g ‐ 56 to 75 kg; 1.6 g ‐ 76 to 90 kg) daily orally 5 days a week OR (1.2 g ‐ 40 to 55 kg; 2 g ‐ 56 to 75 kg; 2.4g ‐ 76 to 90 kg) thrice weekly for 2 months plus basic regimen

Basic regimen:
Isoniazid (300 mg), rifampicin (450 mg if ≤ 45 kg; 600 mg if > 45 kg), and pyrazinamide (1 g ‐ 40 to 55 kg; 1.5 g ‐ 56 to 75 kg; 2 g ‐ 76 to 90 kg) given orally 5 days a week for 2 months; or
Isoniazid (15 mg/kg, max dose 900 mg), rifampicin (450 mg if ≤ 45 kg; 600 mg if > 45 kg), and pyrazinamide (1.5 g ‐ 40 to 55 kg; 2.5 g ‐ 56 to 75 kg; 3 g ‐ 76 to 90 kg) given thrice weekly orally for 2 months

Outcomes

1. Cure (sputum culture negative at 8 weeks)
2. Adverse events
3. Serious adverse events
4. Total number of adverse events (calculated by review authors by summing up reported adverse events)

Notes

Location: Canada, South Africa, Uganda, USA

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status: HIV‐positive participants (30/169 randomized ‐ study group, 30/167 randomized ‐ control group)

Drug‐resistance status: isoniazid resistance (15/169 randomized ‐ study group, 10/167 randomized ‐ control group); 11 participants with resistance to rifampicin, fluoroquinolone or pyrazinamide ‐ excluded from analysis

El‐Sadr 1998

Methods

Multicentre randomized controlled trial

Generation of allocation sequence: centrally randomized with stratified permuted block randomization; the research unit is a stratification factor

Allocation concealment: unclear

Blinding: assessors only

Inclusion of all randomized participants in the final analysis: adequate for 8 weeks; 39% lost to follow up in continuation phase

Mean duration of follow up: 12 months

Participants

Number: 174 randomized; 101 evaluated

Inclusion criteria: suspected human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and pulmonary tuberculosis; age > 18 years in resistant areas or > 13 years in other areas; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤ 10 times upper limit; serum bilirubin < 2.5 times upper limit; serum creatinine ≤ 3 times upper limit or creatinine clearance rate ≥ 50 mL/min

Exclusion criteria: history of multiple‐drug‐resistant tuberculosis (MDR‐TB) or close contact with an MDR‐TB patient; > 3 weeks continuous antituberculous treatment immediately prior to enrolment; > 12 weeks antituberculous therapy in the past 2 years; pregnancy; exclusively extrapulmonary tuberculosis

Interventions

Fluoroquinolone (levofloxacin) added to regimen

1. Levofloxacin plus standard regimen
500 mg levofloxacin daily for 2 weeks (induction phase); then 750 mg levofloxacin thrice weekly for 6 weeks; then standard regimen only (continuation phase)
2. Standard regimen
Induction phase (2 weeks daily): isoniazid (300 mg), vitamin B6 (50 mg), rifampicin (450 to 600 mg; < 50 to > 50 kg), pyrazinamide (1.5 to 2.0 g; < 50 to > 50 kg), ethambutol (20 mg/kg; rounded to the nearest 400 mg)

6 weeks (thrice weekly): isoniazid (600 to 900 mg; < 50 to > 50 kg), vitamin B6 (50 mg), rifampicin (600 mg), pyrazinamide (2.0 to 2.5 g; < 50 to > 50 kg), ethambutol (30 mg/kg; rounded to the nearest 400 mg)
Continuation phase lasting 6 or 9 months (18 or 31 weeks of total therapy) (twice weekly): isoniazid (600 to 900 mg; < 50 to > 50 kg), vitamin B6 (50 mg), rifampicin (600 mg)

Outcomes

1. Cure (sputum culture negative at 8 weeks and at the end of treatment period; at least 2 consecutive negative cultures with no subsequent positive cultures)
2. Treatment failure (sputum smear positive at 8 weeks)
3. Death (from any cause)
4. Death (tuberculosis‐related)
5. Clinical or radiological improvement
6. Serious adverse events

Notes

Location: USA

HIV status: suspected HIV‐positive participants (separate data not provided)

Drug‐resistance status: resistant areas

Huang 2000

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Generation of allocation sequence: unclear

Allocation concealment: unclear

Blinding: unclear

Inclusion of all randomized participants in the final analysis: no losses

Mean duration of follow up: 12 months

Participants

Number: 104 randomized and evaluated

Inclusion criteria: multiple‐drug‐resistant tuberculosis (MDR‐TB) patients with positive sputum smear after 1 year conventional antituberculous treatment; sputum culture showing growth of mycobacterium with multiple resistance to at least 2 of streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, or ethambutol; no history of allergy to fluoroquinolone; age 16 to 75 years

Exclusion criteria: heart, liver or kidney dysfunction, and diabetes

Interventions

Comparison of different fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin versus ofloxacin) added to regimen

1. Sparfloxacin (0.2 twice daily) plus standard regimen
2. Ofloxacin (0.3 twice daily) plus standard regimen

Standard regimen: isoniazid (0.3 g), rifampicin (0.45 g), ethambutol (0.75 g), pyrazinamide (1.5 g), streptomycin (0.75 g intramuscularly)

Outcomes

1. Sputum smear or culture conversion
2. Clinical or radiological improvement
3. Total number of adverse events

Notes

Location: China

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status: presumed HIV negative

Drug‐resistance status: MDR‐TB

Ji 2001

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Generation of allocation sequence: unclear

Allocation concealment: unclear

Blinding: unclear

Inclusion of all randomized participants in the final analysis: no losses to follow up

Mean duration of follow up: 12 months

Participants

Number: 69 randomized (2 new cases; 67 retreatment cases); 69 evaluated

Inclusion criteria: multiple‐drug‐resistant tuberculosis (MDR‐TB); sputum‐positive (not reported if culture or smear) inpatients; age 18 to 70 years; new and retreatment cases

Exclusion criteria: not reported

Interventions

Comparison of different fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin versus ofloxacin) added to regimen

1. Sparfloxacin (200 mg/day orally for 2 months) plus standard regimen
2. Ofloxacin (200 mg/day orally for 2 months) plus standard regimen

Standard regimen: isoniazid (0.3 g), pyrazinamide (1.5 g)

Outcomes

1. Treatment failure
2. Clinical or radiological improvement and sputum conversion
3. Total number of adverse events

Notes

Location: China

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status: not reported

Drug‐resistance status: MDR‐TB

Kennedy 1993

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Generation of allocation sequence: unclear

Allocation concealment: unclear

Blinding: none

Inclusion of all randomized participants in the final analysis: 95.6% included in analysis; 7 (4.4%) excluded

Mean duration of follow up: 6 months

Participants

Number: 160 randomized; 153 evaluated

Inclusion criteria: "presented with pulmonary TB"; new cases; age > 18 years

Exclusion criteria: severe renal, hepatic, or cardiovascular disease

Interventions

Fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin) substituted into regimen (replacing pyrazinamide and ethambutol)

1. Ciprofloxacin (750 mg; for the first 4 months) plus basic regimen
2. Pyrazinamide (25 mg/kg; daily for the first 4 months) and ethambutol (15 mg/kg; daily for the first 2 months) plus basic regimen

Basic regimen (daily orally for 6 months): isoniazid (300 mg) and rifampicin (600 mg)

Outcomes

1. Treatment failure
2. Serious adverse events
3. Adverse events
4. Total number of adverse events

Notes

Location: Tanzania

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status: 37% to 40% HIV‐positive

Drug‐resistance status: presumed sensitive

Kennedy 1996

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Generation of allocation sequence: centrally randomized by computer generated allocation sequence in block size of 10 patients

Allocation concealment: sealed, opaque envelopes

Blinding: only assessors

Inclusion of all randomized participants in the final analysis: 6 (9%) lost to follow up

Mean duration of follow up: 12 months (6 months after cessation of the 6 months' therapy)

Participants

Number: 200 randomized

Inclusion criteria: acid‐fast bacilli present in the sputum on direct fluorescent microscopy

Exclusion criteria: history of treatment of tuberculosis or other exposures to any of the study drugs; sputum cultures positive for mycobacteria other than Mycobacterium tuberculosis; isolates of M. tuberculosis resistant to any of the study drugs; severe renal, hepatic, or cardiovascular disease; pregnancy or lactation; history of adverse reaction to any of the study drugs; epilepsy, concomitant treatment with theophylline; severe tuberculosis unlikely to survive

Interventions

Fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin) substituted into regimen (replacing pyrazinamide and ethambutol)

1. Ciprofloxacin (750 mg; for the first 4 months) plus basic regimen
2. Pyrazinamide (25 mg/kg; daily for the first 4 months) and ethambutol (15 mg/kg; daily for the first 2 months) plus basic regimen

Basic regimen (daily for 6 months): isoniazid (300 mg) and rifampicin (600 mg)

Outcomes

1. Treatment failure (clinical at 12 months)
2. Relapse (sputum culture‐proven relapse during a 6‐month follow‐up period after the completion of the 6 months' treatment regimen)
3. Sputum smear conversion (time (months) to first negative results)
4. Sputum culture conversion (time (months) to first negative results)
5. Sputum culture negative at 4 weeks
6. Sputum culture negative at 8 weeks
7. Number of weeks sputum culture negative by the end of trial (8 weeks)

Notes

Location: Tanzania

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status: data stratified by HIV status

Drug‐resistance status: fully drug‐sensitive tuberculosis

A preliminary report on 20 participants with 8 weeks of follow up (no losses) that provided information on outcomes (5), (6), and (7) was published in 1993

Kohno 1992

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Generation of allocation sequence: unclear

Allocation concealment: unclear

Blinding: unclear

Inclusion of all randomized participants in the final analysis: 32 (20% 25%) lost to follow up

Mean duration of follow up: 12 months

Participants

Number: 156 randomized; 124 evaluated

Inclusion criteria: inpatients previously untreated; sputum smear‐positive or culture‐positive pulmonary tuberculosis, age > 15 years (range 15 to 81 years)

Exclusion criteria: not reported

Interventions

Fluoroquinolone (ofloxacin) substituted into regimen (replacing ethambutol)

1. Ofloxacin (600 mg for the initial 2 months; 300 mg for the following 7 months) plus basic regimen
2. Ethambutol (1 g) plus basic regimen

Basic regimen (orally, daily for 9 months): isoniazid (300 mg), rifampicin (600 mg)

Outcomes

1. Relapse (12 months after cessation of therapy)
2. Radiological improvement

Notes

Location: Nagasaki, Japan

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and drug‐resistance status: not reported

Lu 2000

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Generation of allocation sequence: random‐number table

Allocation concealment: unclear

Blinding: participants blinded; unclear if providers and assessors blinded

Inclusion of all randomized participants in the final analysis: 6/144 (4.167%) lost to follow up

Mean duration of follow up: 6 months

Participants

Number: 144 randomized; 138 evaluated

Inclusion criteria: sputum smear positive and x‐ray confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis, including newly diagnosed (antituberculous treatment ≤ 1 month) or retreatment pulmonary tuberculosis (treatment failure, or after completion of routine chemotherapy with rifampicin or ethambutol for < 6 months, or pyrazinamide < 3 months; or patients relapsed, but never use of fluoroquinolone‐resistant and fluoroquinolone‐sensitive cases); age 15 to 70 years; body weight > 40 kg

Exclusion criteria: pregnancy; severe heart, liver, or kidney diseases; other severe complications

Interventions

Comparison of different fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin versus ofloxacin) added to regimen

1. Intervention group: isoniazid (0.3 g), ethambutol (0.75 to 1 g), pyrazinamide (1.5 g), thioacetazone (0.6 g), levofloxacin (0.3 g)
2. Control group: isoniazid (0.3 g), ethambutol (0.75 to 1 g), pyrazinamide (1.5 g), thioacetazone (0.6 g), ofloxacin (0.6 g)

Outcomes

1. Cure (sputum smear conversion for 2 consecutive months)
2. Radiological improvement
3. Total number of adverse events

Notes

Location: China

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status: presumed HIV negative

Drug‐resistance status: multiple‐drug‐resistant tuberculosis (MDR‐TB) (presumed 38/73)

Mohanty 1993

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Generation of allocation sequence: unclear

Allocation concealment: unclear

Blinding: providers, participants, and radiograph assessors blinded

Inclusion of all randomized participants in the final analysis: 25/60 (42%) lost to follow up

Mean duration of follow up: 6 months of therapy, and 12 months after cessation of therapy

Participants

Number: 60 randomized; 53 evaluated at 2 months, and 35 at 6 months

Inclusion criteria: age > 15 years (age range 15 to > 45 years (9 participants)), sputum smear positive; not previously taken > 3 weeks antituberculous therapy; willing to stay in hospital for initial 2 months' intensive phase of treatment

Exclusion criteria: diabetes; human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection; hypertension; other concomitant diseases; pregnant women

Interventions

Fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin) substituted into regimen (replacing rifampicin)

1. Ciprofloxacin (750 mg orally daily for 6 months) plus basic regimen
2. Rifampicin (450 mg orally daily for 6 months) plus basic regimen

Basic regimen: streptomycin (0.75 g intramuscularly) and pyrazinamide (1.5 g orally) daily for 2 months; isoniazid (400 mg orally daily) for 6 months

Outcomes

1. Sputum smear conversion at 2 and 6 months
2. Treatment failure
3. Relapse
4. Radiological improvement at 2 and 6 months
5. Serious adverse events requiring change of treatment regimen

Notes

Location: India

HIV status: all participants HIV‐negative

Drug‐resistance status: no data

Saigal 2001

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Generation of allocation sequence: random‐number table

Allocation concealment: unclear

Blinding: none

Inclusion of all randomized participants in the final analysis: no losses

Mean duration of follow up: 12 months

Participants

Number: 31 randomized and evaluated

Inclusion criteria: histological evidence of caseating granulomas; sputum positive for acid‐fast bacilli; sputum‐culture positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis; positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for M. tuberculosis in tissues; chronic liver disease informed written consent

Exclusion criteria: serum bilirubin > 5 mg/dL; baseline alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) ALT/AST > 200 international units/L (IU/L); serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL; increase in ALT/AST > 2‐fold baseline levels over 1 week before starting the antituberculous drugs

Interventions

Fluoroquinolone (ofloxacin) and pyrazinamide substituted into regimen (replacing rifampicin).

1. Ofloxacin (400 mg orally) and pyrazinamide (World Health Organization (WHO) dose of 25 mg/kg for initial 2 months) daily for 12 months plus basic regimen
2. Rifampicin (WHO dose of 10 mg/kg orally) daily for 12 months plus basic regimen

Basic regimen: (orally, daily for 12 months): isoniazid (WHO dose of 5 mg/kg), ethambutol (WHO dose of 15 mg/kg daily; for the initial 2 months)

Outcomes

1. Serious adverse events (hepatotoxicity requiring interruption and change of treatment)

Notes

Location: India

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and drug‐resistance status: no data

Sun 2000

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Generation of allocation sequence: unclear

Allocation concealment: unclear

Blinding: unclear

Inclusion of all randomized participants in the final analysis: no losses

Mean duration of follow up: 9 months

Participants

Number: 80 randomized and evaluated

Inclusion criteria: multiple‐drug‐resistant tuberculosis (MDR‐TB) with isoniazid and rifampicin resistance; sputum culture positive after 1 year of treatment with streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol; advanced pulmonary inflammatory or cavity enlarged; no prior fluoroquinolone treatment; adults (mean age 45.5±5.5 years; range 20 to 71 years)

Exclusion criteria: heart, liver, or kidney dysfunction; diabetes

Interventions

Comparison of different fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin versus ofloxacin) added to regimen

1. Sparfloxacin (0.1 g) 4 times daily plus basic regimen
2. Ofloxacin (0.2 g thrice daily) plus basic regimen

Basic regimen: isoniazid (0.2 g), rifampicin (0.15 g), and protionamide (0.2 g thrice daily) for 6 months

Outcomes

1. Sputum smear or culture conversion
2. Clinical or radiological improvement
3. Total number of adverse events

Notes

Location: China

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status: presumed HIV negative

Drug‐resistance status: all proven MDR‐TB

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Andries 2005

Experimental animal study, plus a small section in healthy human volunteers (tolerability); not a trial report

Anonymous 1997

No randomization or control group

Chambers 1998

The outcome, early bactericidal activity, not in review

Chen 2003

No randomization, and the intervention was a combination of levofloxacin plus capreomycin

Chukanov 2006

Mixed intervention of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, or levofloxacin plus kanamycin or amikacin added to the basic regimen in study group versus streptomycin added to the basic regimen in control group

Estebanez 1992

Exclusively urogenital tuberculosis

Gosling 2003

The outcome, early bactericidal activity, not in review

Grishin 1998

No randomization; cohort study

Johnson 2006

The outcome, early bactericidal activity, not in review

Kawahara 1992

No randomization

Kumar 2004

Study in healthy volunteers, not a trial report, in which the outcome was uric acid concentration in urine samples excreted over 0 to 8 h

Marra 2005

Retrospective safety study; not a trial report

O'Brien 1994

Communication to the Editor of Chest; not a trial report

Pletz 2004

The outcome, early bactericidal activity, not in review

Sirgel 1997

The outcome, early bactericidal activity, not in review

Sirgel 2000

The outcome, early bactericidal activity, not in review

Sokolova 1998

No randomization; cohort study

Suo 1996

No randomization; not a controlled study

TRC 2002

No control arm, that is, a group treated without the studied fluoroquinolone (ofloxacin), a different fluoroquinolone, or different dose

Valerio 2003

No randomization and outcomes not reported

Venter 2006

The outcome, indices of adrenocortical function, not in review; none of the included outcomes reported, too small (20 participants)

Wang 2006

Retrospective study; not a trial report

Yoon 2005

Retrospective case‐control study; not a trial report

Zhang 1997

The efficacy of bronchofibrescope and catheter intervention with ofloxacin and amikacin studied in comparison with traditional chemotherapy

Zhang 2006

The efficacy of rifabutin versus rifapentine containing antituberculous regimens studied, both regimens included levofloxacin; study question not in review

Zhao 2003

No randomization

Zheng 2004

Mixed intervention of levofloxacin plus pasiniazide plus Mycobacterium vaccae

Zhu 2006

The efficacy of rifabutin versus rifapentine containing antituberculous regimens studied, both regimens included levofloxacin; study question not in review

Characteristics of studies awaiting assessment [ordered by study ID]

Abdullah 1997

Methods

Participants

Interventions

Outcomes

Notes

Abdullah 1998

Methods

Participants

Interventions

Outcomes

Notes

Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID]

ISRCTN07062956

Trial name or title

A randomised comparison of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and gatifloxacin for the treatment of adults with tuberculous meningitis

Methods

Participants

Inclusion criteria: aged > 14 years; clinical diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis

Exclusion criteria: aged < 15 years; pregnant or breastfeeding; patients in whom the physician believes fluoroquinolones are contraindicated (eg previous adverse reaction); consent of either patient or their relatives not obtained

Interventions

1. Conventional 4‐drug antituberculous chemotherapy (ATC) (comprising of isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol)
2. Conventional 4‐drug ATC plus ciprofloxacin
3. Conventional 4‐drug ATC plus levofloxacin
4. Conventional 4‐drug ATC plus gatifloxacin

Outcomes

1. Clinical:
a. fever clearance, coma clearance, date of discharge, death at 2 months, disability or death at 9 months
b. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure, lactate, white cell count, protein, and glucose

2. Microbiological:
a. time to cerebrospinal fluid sterility
b. time to negative amplified tuberculous meningitis direct test (Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct [MTD] test: Gen‐probe, California)

Starting date

1 April 2003

Contact information

Dr Guy Thwaites ([email protected]), Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Vietnam

Notes

Location: Vietnam

Registration number: ISRCTN07062956

Source of funding: The Wellcome Trust (UK)

ISRCTN13670619

Trial name or title

A comparative study of the bactericidal and sterilizing activity of three fluoroquinolones: gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin and ofloxacin substituted for ethambutol in the 2 month initial phase of the standard anti‐tuberculosis treatment regimen also containing rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide (South Africa)

Methods

Participants

Inclusion criteria: male/female of 18 to 65 years; weight 38 to 80 kg; recently microscopically diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis; findings in medical history and physical examination not exceeding grade 2; voluntarily signed informed consent; confirmed negative pregnancy test at the screening visit; willing to use effective contraceptive methods during treatment; normal lab values not exceeding grade 2, except haemoglobin < 6.5 g/dL and potassium < 3.0 mEq/L (> grade 1); consent for a pre‐screening biological test to exclude possible multi‐drug‐resistant tuberculosis (MDR‐TB) and negative MDR‐TB screen test will be a check if pre‐screening biological test is done

Exclusion criteria: history of tuberculosis within the last 3 years; concomitant infection requiring additional anti‐infectious treatment (especially anti‐retroviral medication (ARV)); human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐infected patients at World Health Organization stage 4; diabetes mellitus or non‐insulin dependent diabetes mellitus requiring treatment; drug and alcohol abuse; history of drug hypersensitivity and/or active allergic disease; impaired renal, hepatic or gastric function that may interfere with drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, or elimination

Interventions

1. Standard antituberculous treatment (isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol)
2. Isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and gatifloxacin
3. Isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ofloxacin
4. Isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and moxifloxacin

Outcomes

Bactericidal and sterilizing activity

Starting date

25 November 2004

Contact information

Dr T Kanyok ([email protected]), UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), Switzerland

Notes

Location: South Africa

Registration number: ISRCTN13670619

Sources of funding: UNICEF‐UNDP‐World Bank‐WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR)

ISRCTN44153044

Trial name or title

An international multicentre controlled clinical trial to evaluate high dose RIFApentine and a QUINolone in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis

Methods

Participants

Inclusion criteria: newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis; 2 sputum specimens positive for tubercle bacilli on direct smear microscopy; either no previous antituberculous chemotherapy, or < 2 weeks of previous chemotherapy; aged 18 years and over; firm home address that is readily accessible for visiting and be intending to remain there during the entire treatment and follow‐up period; willing to agree to participate in the study and to give a sample of blood for HIV testing

Exclusion criteria: any condition (except HIV infection) that may prove fatal during the study period; tuberculous meningitis; pre‐existing nontuberculous disease likely to prejudice the response to, or assessment of, treatment (eg insulin‐dependent diabetes, liver or kidney disease, blood disorders, peripheral neuritis); female and known to be pregnant or breastfeeding; suffering from a condition likely to lead to unco‐operative behaviour such as psychiatric illness or alcoholism; contraindications to any medications in the study regimens; requires anti‐retroviral treatment (ART) at diagnosis; history of prolonged QTc syndrome or current or planned therapy with quinidine, procainamide, amiodarone, sotalol, disopyramide, ziprasidone, or terfenadine during the intensive phase of antituberculous therapy; haemoglobin < 7g/L; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 5 times the upper range; creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min; history of seizures; HIV positive with a CD4 count < 200/mm3; weight < 35 kg

Interventions

1. 2 months of daily ethambutol (E), moxifloxacin (M), rifampicin (R), and pyrazinamide (Z) followed by 2 months of twice weekly moxifloxacin and rifapentine (2EMRZ/2P2M2).
2. 2 months of daily ethambutol, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide followed by 4 months of once weekly moxifloxacin and rifapentine (2EMRZ/4P1M1)
3. 2 months of daily ethambutol (E), isoniazid (H), rifampicin (R), and pyrazinamide (Z) followed by 4 months of daily isoniazid and rifampicin (2EHRZ/4HR)

Outcomes

1. Combined rate of failure at the end of treatment and relapse, measured at 18 months
2. Presence of rifamycin monoresistance (RMR) in relapse cultures of HIV‐infected patients, measured at 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 18 months on the 4‐month arm and 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 18 months on the 6‐month arm, plus at any unscheduled visit
3. Occurrence of serious adverse events at any time during chemotherapy, recorded as they present themselves throughout the course of the trial
4. Sputum culture results at 2 months after the initiation of chemotherapy, measured at all visits
5. Rate of completion of chemotherapy according to the protocol, measured at all visits
6. Number of observed doses of chemotherapy ingested, measured at all visits
7. Any adverse events, recorded as they present themselves throughout the course of the trial

Starting date

31 July 2007

Contact information

Dr Amina Jindani ([email protected]), Centre for Infection

Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

St. George’s University of London, UK

Notes

Location: South Africa, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Zambia

Registration number: ISRCTN44153044

Source of funding: European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) (The Netherlands)

ISRCTN85595810

Trial name or title

Controlled comparison of two moxifloxacin containing treatment shortening regimens in pulmonary tuberculosis

Methods

Participants

Inclusion criteria: signed written consent or witnessed oral consent in the case of illiteracy, before undertaking any trial related activity; 2 sputum specimens positive for tubercle bacilli on direct smear microscopy at the local laboratory; no previous antituberculous chemotherapy; aged 18 years and over; firm home address that is readily accessible for visiting and willingness to inform the study team of any change of address during the treatment and follow‐up period; agreement to participate in the study and to give a sample of blood for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing; laboratory parameters performed up to 14 days before enrolment; serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity < 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN); serum total bilirubin level < 2.5 times ULN; creatinine clearance level > 30 mL/min; haemoglobin level of at least 7.0 g/dL; platelet count of at least 50 x 10^9 cells/L; serum potassium > 3.5 mmol/L; negative pregnancy test (women of childbearing potential); pre‐menopausal women must be using a barrier form of contraception or be surgically sterilized or have an intra‐uterine contraceptive device in place

Exclusion criteria: unable to take oral medication; previously enrolled in this study; received any investigational drug in the past 3 months; received an antibiotic active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the last 14 days (fluoroquinolones, macrolides, standard antituberculous drugs); any condition that may prove fatal during the first two months of the study period; tuberculous meningitis or other forms of severe tuberculosis with high risk of a poor outcome; pre‐existing non‐tuberculosis disease likely to prejudice the response to, or assessment of, treatment (eg insulin‐dependent diabetes, liver or kidney disease, blood disorders, peripheral neuritis, chronic diarrhoeal disease); pregnant or breast feeding; suffering from a condition likely to lead to unco‐operative behaviour (eg psychiatric illness or alcoholism); contraindications to any medications in the study regimens; known to have congenital or sporadic syndromes of QTc prolongation or receiving concomitant medication reported to increase the QTc interval (eg amiodarone, sotalol, disopyramide, quinidine, procainamide, terfenadine); end stage liver failure (class Child‐Pugh C); uncorrected hypokalaemia; weight < 35 kg; known allergy to any fluoroquinolone antibiotic or history of tendinopathy associated with quinolones; HIV infection with CD4 count < 250 x 10^9/L; patients already receiving anti‐retroviral therapy; patients whose initial isolate is shown to be multiple drug resistant

Interventions

1. 8 weeks of chemotherapy with ethambutol, isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide plus the moxifloxacin placebo, followed by 9 weeks of isoniazid and rifampicin plus the moxifloxacin placebo, followed by 9 weeks of isoniazid and rifampicin only
2. 8 weeks of chemotherapy with moxifloxacin, isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide plus the ethambutol placebo, followed by 9 weeks of moxifloxacin, isoniazid and rifampicin, followed by 9 weeks of the isoniazid placebo and the rifampicin placebo
3. 8 weeks of chemotherapy with ethambutol, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide plus the isoniazid placebo, followed by 9 weeks of moxifloxacin and rifampicin plus the isoniazid placebo, followed by 9 weeks of the isoniazid placebo and the rifampicin placebo

Dosages dependent on patient weight category (all drugs taken orally):
1. Moxifloxacin: 400 mg
2. Rifampicin: ≤ 45 kg ‐ 450 mg; > 45 kg ‐ 600 mg
3. Isoniazid: 300 mg
4. Pyrazinamide: < 40 kg ‐ 25 mg/kg rounded to nearest 500 mg; 40 to 55 kg ‐ 1000 mg; 55 to 75 kg ‐ 1500 mg; > 75 kg ‐ 2000 mg
5. Ethambutol: < 40 kg ‐ 15 mg/kg rounded to nearest 100 mg; 40 to 55 kg ‐ 800 mg; 55 to 75 kg ‐ 1200 mg; > 75 kg ‐ 1600 mg

Outcomes

1. Combined failure of bacteriological cure and relapse within 1 year of completion of therapy
2. Proportion of patients with grade 3 or 4 adverse events according to the World Health Organization grade
3. Proportion of participants culture negative at 8 weeks
4. Time to culture negative sputum
5. Speed of decline of sputum viable count

Starting date

1 June 2007

Contact information

Prof Stephen Gillespie, Centre for Medical Microbiology,

Royal Free and University College Medical School, UK

Notes

Location: Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, Zambia

Registration number: ISRCTN85595810

Sources of funding: European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) (The Netherlands); TB Alliance (USA); Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals (USA); Sanofi‐Aventis (France)

NCT00144417

Trial name or title

TBTC Study 28: Evaluation of a moxifloxacin‐based, isoniazid‐sparing regimen for tuberculosis treatment

Methods

Participants

Inclusion criteria: suspected pulmonary tuberculosis with acid‐fast bacilli in a stained smear of expectorated or induced sputum. Patients whose sputum cultures do not grow M. tuberculosis and those having an M. tuberculosis isolate resistant to (one or more) isoniazid, rifampin, fluoroquinolones, will be discontinued from the study, but followed for 14 days to detect late toxicities from study therapy. Patients having extra‐pulmonary manifestations of tuberculosis, in addition to smear‐positive pulmonary disease, are eligible for enrolment. Sputum must be expectorated or induced; smear results from respiratory secretions obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage or bronchial wash may not be used for assessment of study eligibility; willingness to have HIV testing performed, if HIV serostatus is not known or if the last documented negative HIV test was more than 6 months before enrolment. HIV testing does not need to be repeated if there is written documentation of a positive test (positive ELISA and Western Blot or a plasma HIV‐RNA level > 5000 copies/mL) at any time in the past; 7 or fewer days of multidrug therapy for tuberculosis disease in the 6 months preceding enrolment; 7 or fewer days of fluoroquinolone therapy in the 3 months preceding enrolment; age > 18 years; Karnofsky score of at least 60 (requires occasional assistance but is able to care for most of his/her needs); signed informed consent; women with child‐bearing potential must agree to practice an adequate (barrier) method of birth control or to abstain from heterosexual intercourse during study therapy; serum amino aspartate transferase (AST) activity ≤ 3 times upper limit of normal; serum total bilirubin level ≤ 2.5 times upper limit of normal; serum creatinine level ≤ 2 times upper limit of normal; complete blood count with hemoglobin level of at least 7.0 g/dL; complete blood count with platelet count of at least 50,000/mm 3 ; serum potassium > 3.5 meq/L; negative pregnancy test (women of childbearing potential)

Exclusion criteria: breastfeeding; known intolerance to any of the study drugs; known allergy to any fluoroquinolone antibiotic; concomitant disorders or conditions for which moxifloxacin (MXF), isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), pyrazinamide (PZA), or ethambutol (EMB) are contraindicated (including severe hepatic damage, acute liver disease of any cause, and acute uncontrolled gouty arthritis); current or planned therapy during the intensive phase of therapy using drugs having unacceptable interactions with rifampin (rifabutin can be substituted for rifampin during the continuation phase of therapy); current or planned antiretroviral therapy during intensive phase of therapy; history of prolonged QT syndrome or current or planned therapy with quinidine, procainamide, amiodarone, sotalol, disopyramide, ziprasidone, or terfenadine during the intensive phase of therapy; pulmonary silicosis; central nervous system tuberculosis

Interventions

1. Moxifloxacin (with rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol)
2. Isoniazid (with rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol)

Outcomes

1. Culture‐conversion rate at the end of the intensive phase of therapy
2. Safety and tolerability
3. Time to culture‐conversion using data from 2‐, 4‐, 6‐, and 8‐week cultures
4. Proportion of patients with any Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions
5. Adverse events and 2‐month culture conversion rates among HIV‐infected patients vs. HIV‐uninfected patients
6. Rates of treatment failure
7. Delayed toxicity attributable to moxifloxacin (toxicity that becomes evident after the 8 weeks of moxifloxacin therapy)

Starting date

February 2006

Contact information

Richard E Chaisson (Study Chair), Johns Hopkins University, USA

Notes

Location: Brazil, Canada (Manitoba, Quebec), South Africa, Spain, Uganda, USA (Arkansas, California, Colorado, Washington DC, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Washington)

Registration number: NCT00144417

Sponsors and collaborators: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Global Alliance for TB Drug Development; Bayer

NCT00216385

Trial name or title

A controlled trial of a 4‐month quinolone‐containing regimen for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis

Methods

Participants

Inclusion criteria: male or female; aged 18 to 65 years; currently suffering from recently diagnosed microscopically proven pulmonary tuberculosis and providing informed consent for inclusion in the study

Exclusion criteria: history of tuberculosis treatment within the last 3 years; history of diabetes mellitus or noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus requiring treatment; concomitant infection requiring additional anti‐infective treatment (especially anti‐retroviral therapy); HIV‐ infected patients with WHO stage 3 infection ‐ except those presenting with only the "loss of weight>10% body weight" criterion ‐ and all HIV infected patients at WHO stage 4

Interventions

1. 4‐month gatifloxacin‐containing antituberculous regimen
2. Standard antituberculous regimen

Outcomes

1. Percentage of relapses by 24 months following treatment cure
2. Percentage of adverse events
3. Time to relapse
4. Percentage of smear and culture conversion at 8 weeks
5. Percentage of patient cured at the end 6. of treatment
7. Time to a composite "unsatisfactory" endpoint
8. Distribution of type and grading of adverse events

Starting date

January 2005

Contact information

Christian Lienhardt (Study Director), Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, France

Notes

Location: Benin, Guinea, Kenya, Senegal, South Africa

Registration number: NCT00216385

Sponsors and collaborators: Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement; World Health Organization;
European Commission

NCT00396084

Trial name or title

Randomized, open label, multiple dose Phase I study of the early bactericidal activity of linezolid, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin in HIV‐non‐infected adults with Initial episodes of sputum smear‐positive pulmonary tuberculosis (DMID 01‐553)

Methods

Participants

Inclusion criteria: adults, male or female, aged 18 to 65 years; women with child‐bearing potential (not surgically sterilized or postmenopausal for < 1 year) must be using or agree to use an adequate method of birth control (condom: intravaginal spermicide (foams, jellies, sponge) and diaphragm: cervical cap or intrauterine device) during study drug treatment; newly diagnosed sputum smear‐positive pulmonary tuberculosis as confirmed by sputum AFB smear and chest x‐ray findings consistent with pulmonary tuberculosis; willing and able to provide informed consent; reasonably normal hemoglobin (≥ 8 gm/dL), renal function (serum creatinine < 2 mg/dL), hepatic function (serum AST < 1.5 times the upper limit of normal for the testing laboratory and total bilirubin < 1.3 mg/dL), and random blood glucose < 150 mg/dL

Exclusion criteria: HIV infection; weight < 75% of ideal body weight; presence of significant hemoptysis; patients who cough up frank blood (more than blood streaked sputum); pregnant or breastfeeding women and those who are not practicing birth control; significant respiratory impairment (respiratory rate > 35/min); clinical suspicion of dissemated tuberculosis or tuberculosis meningitis; presence of serious underlying medical illness (eg such as liver failure, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, chronic alcoholism, decompensated heart failure, haematologic malignancy) or patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy; patients receiving any of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (phenelzine, tranylcypromine), adrenergic/serotonergic agonists such as pseudoephedrine and phenylpropanolamine (frequently found in cold and cough remedies), tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline, nortriptyline, protriptyline, doxepin, amoxapine, etc), antipsychotics (eg chlorpromazine and buspirone), serotonin re‐uptake inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertaline, etc), buproprion, agents known to prolong the QTc interval [erythromycin, clarithromycin, astemizole, type Ia (quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide) and III (amiodarone, sotalol) anti‐arrhythmics, carbamazepine, insulin, sulfonylureas, and meperidine; presence of QTc prolongation (> 450 msec) on baseline EKG; allergy or contraindication to use of study drugs; treatment with antituberculous medications or other antibiotics with known activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis during the preceding 6 months; inability to provide informed consent; total white blood cell count < 3000/mm3; platelet count < 150,000/mm3; patients with suspected drug‐resistant tuberculosis (eg contact to source patient with drug‐resistant tuberculosis, patients who have relapsed after previous treatment for tuberculosis); patients likely, in the opinion of the local investigator, to be unable to comply with the requirements of the study protocol

Interventions

Participants will be randomized to receive gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, or isoniazid (control), and after these arms are enrolled, they will be randomized to receive either linezolid (600 mg once daily) or linezolid (600 mg twice daily) or isoniazid (control). After the initial treatment, all participants will receive 6 months of standard antituberculous treatment outside of the hospital

Outcomes

1. Early bactericidal activity
2. Extended early bactericidal activity
3. Safety evaluations including clinical examination, complete blood counts, and serum total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, and creatinine, and urinalysis will be followed to monitor for drug toxicity

Starting date

February 2004

Contact information

John Johnson ([email protected])

Notes

Location: University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil

Registration number: NCT00396084

Sponsors: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) at 8 weeks Show forest plot

3

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.82, 1.17]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) at 8 weeks.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) at 8 weeks.

1.1 Ciprofloxacin vs rifampicin

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.88, 1.32]

1.2 Ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

20

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.42, 1.09]

1.3 Moxifloxacin vs ethambutol

1

336

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.83, 1.19]

2 Treatment failure at 12 months Show forest plot

3

388

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.14 [0.71, 6.42]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.

2.1 Ciprofloxacin vs rifampicin

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.13, 70.83]

2.2 Ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

2

328

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.03 [0.63, 6.58]

3 Relapse Show forest plot

3

384

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.17 [1.33, 38.58]

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 3 Relapse.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 3 Relapse.

3.1 Ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

168

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

15.72 [0.91, 270.96]

3.2 Ciprofloxacin vs rifampicin

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.33, 27.23]

3.3 Ofloxacin vs ethambutol

1

156

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Relapse: by HIV status Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 4 Relapse: by HIV status.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 4 Relapse: by HIV status.

4.1 HIV‐positive participants: ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 HIV‐negative participants: ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Time to sputum culture conversion (months) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 5 Time to sputum culture conversion (months).

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 5 Time to sputum culture conversion (months).

5.1 Ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Time to sputum culture conversion (months): by HIV status Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 6 Time to sputum culture conversion (months): by HIV status.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 6 Time to sputum culture conversion (months): by HIV status.

6.1 HIV‐positive participants: ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 HIV‐negative participants: ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks Show forest plot

2

216

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.49, 1.59]

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 7 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 7 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.

7.1 Ciprofloxacin vs rifampicin

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.88, 1.32]

7.2 Ofloxacin vs ethambutol

1

156

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.44, 1.08]

8 Serious adverse events Show forest plot

5

743

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.56, 1.72]

Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 8 Serious adverse events.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 8 Serious adverse events.

8.1 Ciprofloxacin vs rifampicin

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.07, 15.26]

8.2 Ofloxacin vs ethambutol

1

156

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [0.47, 3.57]

8.3 Ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

160

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.20, 4.69]

8.4 Ofloxacin vs rifampicin

1

31

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [0.01, 1.79]

8.5 Moxifloxacin vs ethambutol

1

336

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.50, 3.05]

9 Total number of adverse events Show forest plot

4

712

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.96, 1.43]

Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 9 Total number of adverse events.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 9 Total number of adverse events.

9.1 Ciprofloxacin vs rifampicin

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.22, 4.56]

9.2 Ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

160

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.60, 1.24]

9.3 Ofloxacin vs ethambutol

1

156

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.95 [0.70, 5.44]

9.4 Moxifloxacin vs ethambutol

1

336

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.29 [1.00, 1.66]

10 Total number of adverse events, substitutions for ethambutol Show forest plot

2

492

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.34 [1.05, 1.72]

Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 10 Total number of adverse events, substitutions for ethambutol.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 10 Total number of adverse events, substitutions for ethambutol.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Fluoroquinolone added to regimen

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) at 8 weeks Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) at 8 weeks.

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) at 8 weeks.

1.1 Levofloxacin vs no levofloxacin

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Treatment failure at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.

2.1 Levofloxacin vs no levofloxacin

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.

3.1 Levofloxacin vs no levofloxacin

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Death from any cause Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 4 Death from any cause.

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 4 Death from any cause.

4.1 Levofloxacin vs no levofloxacin

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Tuberculosis‐related death Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 5 Tuberculosis‐related death.

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 5 Tuberculosis‐related death.

5.1 Levofloxacin vs no levofloxacin

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Serious adverse events Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 6 Serious adverse events.

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 6 Serious adverse events.

6.1 Levofloxacin vs no levofloxacin

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) within 2 to 3 weeks Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) within 2 to 3 weeks.

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) within 2 to 3 weeks.

2 Treatment failure at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.

3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.

4 Total number of adverse events Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 4 Total number of adverse events.

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 4 Total number of adverse events.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 4. Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Cure (sputum culture conversion within 2 to 3 weeks) Show forest plot

2

184

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.10 [0.77, 5.71]

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion within 2 to 3 weeks).

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion within 2 to 3 weeks).

2 Treatment failure at 12 months Show forest plot

2

149

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.26, 1.47]

Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.

3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks Show forest plot

3

333

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.92, 1.24]

Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.

4 Total number of adverse events Show forest plot

3

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.59, 1.64]

Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 4 Total number of adverse events.

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 4 Total number of adverse events.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) at 8 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) at 8 weeks.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 3 Relapse.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 3 Relapse.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 4 Relapse: by HIV status.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 4 Relapse: by HIV status.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 5 Time to sputum culture conversion (months).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 5 Time to sputum culture conversion (months).

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 6 Time to sputum culture conversion (months): by HIV status.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 6 Time to sputum culture conversion (months): by HIV status.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 7 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 7 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 8 Serious adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 8 Serious adverse events.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 9 Total number of adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 9 Total number of adverse events.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 10 Total number of adverse events, substitutions for ethambutol.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen, Outcome 10 Total number of adverse events, substitutions for ethambutol.

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) at 8 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) at 8 weeks.

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 4 Death from any cause.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 4 Death from any cause.

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 5 Tuberculosis‐related death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 5 Tuberculosis‐related death.

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 6 Serious adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Fluoroquinolone added to regimen, Outcome 6 Serious adverse events.

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) within 2 to 3 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) within 2 to 3 weeks.

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 4 Total number of adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen, Outcome 4 Total number of adverse events.

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion within 2 to 3 weeks).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 1 Cure (sputum culture conversion within 2 to 3 weeks).

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 2 Treatment failure at 12 months.

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks.

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 4 Total number of adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens, Outcome 4 Total number of adverse events.

Table 1. Highest multiple‐drug‐resistant tuberculosis (MDR‐TB) rates in 1998a

Location

New case

Previously treated case

Estonia

14.1

18.1

Henan Province, China

10.8

15.1

Latvia

9.0

12.0

Ivanovo Oblast, Russian Federation

9.0

12.3

Tomsk Oblast, Russian Federation

6.5

13.7

aSource: Loddenkemper 2002.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Highest multiple‐drug‐resistant tuberculosis (MDR‐TB) rates in 1998a
Table 2. Risk of bias assessment

Trial

Allocation sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding

Inclusiona

Burman 2006

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Inadequate

El‐Sadr 1998

Adequate

Unclear

Assessors only

Adequate for 8 weeks
Inadequate for continuation phase (39% lost)

Huang 2000

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Adequate

Ji 2001

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Adequate

Kennedy 1993

Unclear

Unclear

None

Adequate

Kennedy 1996

Adequate

Adequate

Assessors only

Adequate

Kohno 1992

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Inadequate

Lu 2000

Adequate

Unclear

Participants: yes
Providers and assessors: unclear

Adequate

Mohanty 1993

Unclear

Unclear

Providers, participants, and radiograph assessors: yes

Inadequate

Saigal 2001

Adequate

Unclear

None

Adequate

Sun 2000

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Adequate

aInclusion of all randomized participants in the final analysis.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Risk of bias assessment
Comparison 1. Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) at 8 weeks Show forest plot

3

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.82, 1.17]

1.1 Ciprofloxacin vs rifampicin

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.88, 1.32]

1.2 Ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

20

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.42, 1.09]

1.3 Moxifloxacin vs ethambutol

1

336

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.83, 1.19]

2 Treatment failure at 12 months Show forest plot

3

388

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.14 [0.71, 6.42]

2.1 Ciprofloxacin vs rifampicin

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.13, 70.83]

2.2 Ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

2

328

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.03 [0.63, 6.58]

3 Relapse Show forest plot

3

384

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.17 [1.33, 38.58]

3.1 Ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

168

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

15.72 [0.91, 270.96]

3.2 Ciprofloxacin vs rifampicin

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.33, 27.23]

3.3 Ofloxacin vs ethambutol

1

156

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Relapse: by HIV status Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 HIV‐positive participants: ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 HIV‐negative participants: ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Time to sputum culture conversion (months) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Time to sputum culture conversion (months): by HIV status Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 HIV‐positive participants: ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 HIV‐negative participants: ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks Show forest plot

2

216

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.49, 1.59]

7.1 Ciprofloxacin vs rifampicin

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.88, 1.32]

7.2 Ofloxacin vs ethambutol

1

156

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.44, 1.08]

8 Serious adverse events Show forest plot

5

743

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.56, 1.72]

8.1 Ciprofloxacin vs rifampicin

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.07, 15.26]

8.2 Ofloxacin vs ethambutol

1

156

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [0.47, 3.57]

8.3 Ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

160

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.20, 4.69]

8.4 Ofloxacin vs rifampicin

1

31

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [0.01, 1.79]

8.5 Moxifloxacin vs ethambutol

1

336

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.50, 3.05]

9 Total number of adverse events Show forest plot

4

712

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.96, 1.43]

9.1 Ciprofloxacin vs rifampicin

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.22, 4.56]

9.2 Ciprofloxacin vs ethambutol plus pyrazinamide

1

160

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.60, 1.24]

9.3 Ofloxacin vs ethambutol

1

156

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.95 [0.70, 5.44]

9.4 Moxifloxacin vs ethambutol

1

336

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.29 [1.00, 1.66]

10 Total number of adverse events, substitutions for ethambutol Show forest plot

2

492

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.34 [1.05, 1.72]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Fluoroquinolone substituted into regimen
Comparison 2. Fluoroquinolone added to regimen

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) at 8 weeks Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Levofloxacin vs no levofloxacin

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Treatment failure at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Levofloxacin vs no levofloxacin

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Levofloxacin vs no levofloxacin

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Death from any cause Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Levofloxacin vs no levofloxacin

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Tuberculosis‐related death Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Levofloxacin vs no levofloxacin

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Serious adverse events Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Levofloxacin vs no levofloxacin

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Fluoroquinolone added to regimen
Comparison 3. Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Cure (sputum culture conversion) within 2 to 3 weeks Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Treatment failure at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4 Total number of adverse events Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Comparison of fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin vs ofloxacin) substituted into regimen
Comparison 4. Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Cure (sputum culture conversion within 2 to 3 weeks) Show forest plot

2

184

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.10 [0.77, 5.71]

2 Treatment failure at 12 months Show forest plot

2

149

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.26, 1.47]

3 Clinical or radiological improvement at 8 weeks Show forest plot

3

333

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.92, 1.24]

4 Total number of adverse events Show forest plot

3

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.59, 1.64]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Comparison of fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin) added to regimens