Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Corticosteroides prenatales para acelerar la maduración del pulmón fetal en mujeres con riesgo de parto prematuro

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub4Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 25 diciembre 2020see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Emma McGoldricka

    Correspondencia a: Obstetrics Directorate, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK

    [email protected]

    These authors contributed equally to this work

  • Fiona Stewarta

    Cochrane Children and Families Network, c/o Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth, Department of Women's and Children's Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    These authors contributed equally to this work

  • Roses Parker

    Musculoskeletal, Oral, Skin and Sensory Network, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Second Floor, OUH Cowley Unipart House Business Centre, Oxford, UK

  • Stuart R Dalziel

    Departments of Surgery and Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Children's Emergency Department, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

Contributions of authors

For this update the contributions of each author are listed below.

Fiona Stewart assessed all trials for trustworthiness, extracted and entered data, assessed risk of bias, assessed certainty of evidence, drafted 'Summary of findings' tables, drafted text of the review. Emma McGoldrick assessed all trials for trustworthiness, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, re‐analysed intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) data. Roses Parker, for a proportion of trials, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and assessed for trustworthiness. She also assessed certainty of evidence and drafted 'Summary of findings' tables. Stuart Dalziel reviewed all aspects of review and contributed to text.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Auckland, New Zealand

  • The University of Liverpool, UK

  • Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, UK

External sources

  • Harris‐Wellbeing of Women Preterm Birth Centre, UK

  • Cure Kids, New Zealand

Declarations of interest

Fiona Stewart: none known

Emma McGoldrick: none known

Roses Parker: none known

Stuart Dalziel reports receiving research funding, not associated with the review topic, from Cure Kids, Health Research Council, and Starship Foundation, New Zealand. Stuart Dalziel is employed by The University of Auckland and Auckland District Health Board. He is also on the board of the Advanced Paediatric Life Support New Zealand.

Acknowledgements

P Crowley's first, unstructured review of antenatal corticosteroids was conducted at the suggestion of Professor Dennis Hawkins in 1980. Dr Anne Anderson encouraged her to use it as a basis for an early meta‐analysis in 1981. Her work at the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit in 1980 to 1981 was funded by the National Maternity Hospital, Dublin at the suggestion of the then Master, Dr Dermot MacDonald. This review was first published in structured form on the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials in 1989. The preparation and continued updating of the original review would have been impossible without the help of Iain and Jan Chalmers, Marc Keirse, Jini Hetherington, Sonja Henderson and Professor Zarko Alfirevic.

Acknowledgements to Professor James Neilson and Professor Jane Harding for their help with the previous update. Many thanks to Sonja Henderson for sound advice at all times. Acknowledgements also to all the study authors who provided us with additional data.

Thanks to Almira Opardija for translating Grgic 2003. Thanks also to Bita Mesgarpour for translating Mansouri 2010.

For the 2017 update: we acknowledge and thank Tineke Crawford for her contribution to editing the review and updating some of the evidence. We would also like to thank Leanne Jones and Therese Dowswell for their contribution to editing the review.

We acknowledge the contribution of Devener Roberts, Nancy Medley, and Julie Brown for their author contributions to previous versions of this review.

As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by three peers (an editor and two referees who are external to the editorial team), a member of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser. The authors are grateful to the following peer reviewers for their time and comments: Doris Chou, Maternal and Perinatal Health, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva; Jim G Thornton, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nottingham, UK.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), via Evidence Synthesis Programme funding to Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Evidence Synthesis Programme, the NIHR, National Health Service (NHS) or the Department of Health and Social Care.

S Dalziel's time was supported by Cure Kids New Zealand.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Dec 25

Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth

Review

Emma McGoldrick, Fiona Stewart, Roses Parker, Stuart R Dalziel

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub4

2017 Mar 21

Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth

Review

Devender Roberts, Julie Brown, Nancy Medley, Stuart R Dalziel

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub3

2006 Jul 19

Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth

Review

Devender Roberts, Stuart R Dalziel

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub2

2003 Oct 20

Antenatal corticosteroids to accelerate fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth

Protocol

Patricia Crowley, Devender Roberts, Stuart R Dalziel, Ben NJ Shaw

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004454

Differences between protocol and review

The methods have been updated to current standard methods text for the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group.

The following subgroups were not pre‐specified in the protocol:

  1. decade of trial;

  2. gestational age at trial entry;

  3. protocol with weekly repeats.

In the 2016 update, comparison one was re‐structured to include only the main analysis, with all clinical groups moved to subsequent comparisons. We have also deleted subgroups from previous versions of the review related to post‐randomisation variables (gestational age to delivery and ruptured membranes at specific time points). A 'Summary of findings' table has been incorporated in this update (2016).

We clarified the primary outcome of deaths (fetal/neonatal) to perinatal deaths. Neonatal deaths and fetal deaths are still presented separately as primary outcomes.

We renamed outcomes of mean length for children and adults as mean height.

In response to referee feedback we changed the name of the primary outcome 'puerperal sepsis' to 'endometritis (including infections)'. Most trials (7/10) in this analysis specifically reported endometritis.

2020 update

We used pre‐defined criteria to assess the trustworthiness of studies that otherwise meet the review's inclusion criteria. We put any studies that were assessed as untrustworthy into 'awaiting classification' and did not include them in the review.

To ensure a consistent approach in our analysis we applied the intention‐to‐treat principle for all outcomes related to the neonate/fetus, and we expanded our methods in this regard in the 'Dealing with missing data' section.

We amended our methods for assessing heterogeneity using up‐to‐date Cochrane methods.

We checked and re‐analysed the data relating to the intraventricular haemorrhage(IVH) to take into different methods of diagnosing IVH.

For the child and the child as adult, we removed the secondary outcomes relating to visual impairment, hearing impairment, developmental delay and intellectual impairment since these are all included in the primary outcome of neurodevelopmental disability.

We added two outcomes to the 'Summary of findings' table ‐ neonatal death and neurodevelopmental disability ‐ because we believe these outcomes are important in presenting a more complete summary of the evidence.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Applying the trustworthiness screening tool criteria

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Applying the trustworthiness screening tool criteria

Study flow diagram.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Study flow diagram.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.4 Perinatal deaths

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.4 Perinatal deaths

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.5 Neonatal deaths

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.5 Neonatal deaths

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.6 Fetal deaths

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 7

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.6 Fetal deaths

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.7 Respiratory distress syndrome

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 8

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.7 Respiratory distress syndrome

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.7 Intraventricular haemorrhage.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 9

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.7 Intraventricular haemorrhage.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.11 Mean birthweight (g)

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 10

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.11 Mean birthweight (g)

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.2 Chorioamnionitis

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 11

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.2 Chorioamnionitis

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.11 Endometritis.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 12

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.11 Endometritis.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.30 Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 13

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.30 Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.25 Need for mechanical ventilation/CPAP

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 14

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.25 Need for mechanical ventilation/CPAP

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.38 Proven infection while in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 15

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.38 Proven infection while in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.39 Necrotising enterocolitis.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 16

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.39 Necrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1: Perinatal death

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1: Perinatal death

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 2: Neonatal death

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 2: Neonatal death

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 3: Fetal death

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 3: Fetal death

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 4: Respiratory distress syndrome

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 4: Respiratory distress syndrome

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 5: Moderate/severe respiratory distress syndrome

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 5: Moderate/severe respiratory distress syndrome

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 6: Chronic lung disease

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 6: Chronic lung disease

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 7: Intraventricular haemorrhage

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 7: Intraventricular haemorrhage

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 8: Mean birthweight (g)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 8: Mean birthweight (g)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 9: Maternal death

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 9: Maternal death

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 10: Chorioamnionitis

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 10: Chorioamnionitis

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 11: Endometritis

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 11: Endometritis

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 12: Death in childhood

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 12: Death in childhood

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 13: Neurodevelopmental disability in childhood

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 13: Neurodevelopmental disability in childhood

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 14: Death into adulthood

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 14: Death into adulthood

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 15: Neurodevelopmental disability in adulthood

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 15: Neurodevelopmental disability in adulthood

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 16: Fever in women after trial entry requiring the use of antibiotics

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 16: Fever in women after trial entry requiring the use of antibiotics

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 17: Intrapartum fever in woman requiring the use of antibiotics

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 17: Intrapartum fever in woman requiring the use of antibiotics

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 18: Postnatal fever in woman

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 18: Postnatal fever in woman

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 19: Admission into adult intensive care unit

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 19: Admission into adult intensive care unit

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 20: Side effects of therapy in women

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 20: Side effects of therapy in women

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 21: Glucose intolerance

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 21: Glucose intolerance

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 22: Hypertension

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 22: Hypertension

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 23: Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.23

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 23: Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 24: Mean interval between trial entry and birth (days)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.24

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 24: Mean interval between trial entry and birth (days)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 25: Mean length at birth (cm)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.25

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 25: Mean length at birth (cm)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 26: Mean head circumference at birth (cm)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.26

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 26: Mean head circumference at birth (cm)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 27: Small‐for‐gestational age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.27

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 27: Small‐for‐gestational age

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 28: Admission to neonatal intensive care unit

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.28

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 28: Admission to neonatal intensive care unit

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 29: Need for mechanical ventilation/CPAP

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.29

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 29: Need for mechanical ventilation/CPAP

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 30: Mean duration of mechanical ventilation/CPAP (days)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.30

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 30: Mean duration of mechanical ventilation/CPAP (days)

Median (IQR) duration of mechanical ventilation (hours)

Study

Corticosteroids

Placebo

WHO 2020

18 hours (12‐48)

83 infants

18 hours (12‐60)

103 infants

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.31

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 31: Median (IQR) duration of mechanical ventilation (hours)

Median (IQR) duration of CPAP (hours)

Study

Corticosteroids

Placebo

WHO 2020

48 hours (24‐96)

265 infants

48 hours (24‐84)

337 infants

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.32

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 32: Median (IQR) duration of CPAP (hours)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 33: Air leak syndrome

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.33

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 33: Air leak syndrome

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 34: Mean duration of oxygen supplementation (hours)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.34

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 34: Mean duration of oxygen supplementation (hours)

Median (IQR) duration of oxygen supplementation (hours)

Study

Corticosteroids

Placebo

WHO 2020

36 (18‐96)

726 infants

48 (12‐93)

756 infants

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.35

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 35: Median (IQR) duration of oxygen supplementation (hours)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 36: Surfactant use

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.36

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 36: Surfactant use

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 37: Systemic infection in the first 48 hours of life

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.37

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 37: Systemic infection in the first 48 hours of life

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 38: Proven infection while in the neonatal intensive care unit

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.38

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 38: Proven infection while in the neonatal intensive care unit

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 39: Necrotising enterocolitis

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.39

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 39: Necrotising enterocolitis

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 40: Mean infant HPA axis function (cortisol)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.40

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 40: Mean infant HPA axis function (cortisol)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 41: Mean childhood weight (kg)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.41

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 41: Mean childhood weight (kg)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 42: Mean childhood head circumference (cm)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.42

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 42: Mean childhood head circumference (cm)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 43: Mean childhood height (cm)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.43

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 43: Mean childhood height (cm)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 44: Mean childhood systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.44

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 44: Mean childhood systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 45: Cerebral palsy in childhood

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.45

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 45: Cerebral palsy in childhood

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 46: Behavioural/learning difficulties in childhood

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.46

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 46: Behavioural/learning difficulties in childhood

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 47: Mean adult weight (kg)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.47

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 47: Mean adult weight (kg)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 48: Mean adult head circumference (cm)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.48

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 48: Mean adult head circumference (cm)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 49: Mean adult height (cm)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.49

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 49: Mean adult height (cm)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 50: Mean adult skinfold thickness (log values)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.50

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 50: Mean adult skinfold thickness (log values)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 51: Abnormal lung function measured as forced vital capacity (adult)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.51

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 51: Abnormal lung function measured as forced vital capacity (adult)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 52: Mean adult systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.52

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 52: Mean adult systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 53: Mean adult insulin (log values)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.53

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 53: Mean adult insulin (log values)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 54: Mean adult glucose

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.54

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 54: Mean adult glucose

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 55: Mean adult HPA axis function (mean log fasting cortisol)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.55

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 55: Mean adult HPA axis function (mean log fasting cortisol)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 56: Mean age at puberty (years)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.56

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 56: Mean age at puberty (years)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 57: Educational achievement by adulthood (university or polytechnic education)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.57

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 57: Educational achievement by adulthood (university or polytechnic education)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 58: Mean length of antenatal hospitalisation (days)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.58

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 58: Mean length of antenatal hospitalisation (days)

Length of maternal hospital stay

Study

Measure

Corticosteroids

Control

Attawattanakul 2015

Overall length of maternal hospital stay (days) (mean (SD))

3.57 (0.87)

96 women

3.58 (0.75)

98 women

Gyamfi‐Bannerman 2016

Overall length of maternal hospital stay (days) (median (IQR))

3 (3 to 5)

1427 women

3 (3 to 5)

1400 women

Mansouri 2010

Number of women requiring a hospital stay of more than three days

12/100

12/100

WHO 2020

Overall length of maternal hospital stay (days) (median (IQR))

8 (4 to 20)

1323 women

8 (4 to19)

1322 women

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.59

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 59: Length of maternal hospital stay

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 60: Mean length of postnatal hospitalisation (days)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.60

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 60: Mean length of postnatal hospitalisation (days)

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 61: Mean length of neonatal hospitalisation (days)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.61

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 61: Mean length of neonatal hospitalisation (days)

Length of neonatal hospitalisation

Study

Measure

Corticosteroids

Control

Gyamfi‐Bannerman 2016

Overall length of neonatal hospital stay (days) (median (IQR))

7 (4 to 12)

1427 infants

8 (4 to 13)

1400 infants

WHO 2020

Overall length of neonatal hospital stay (days) (median (IQR))

8 (3 to17)

1320 infants

8 (3 to 17)

1301 infants

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.62

Comparison 1: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 62: Length of neonatal hospitalisation

Comparison 2: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ single or multiple pregnancy, Outcome 1: Perinatal death ‐ single or multiple pregnancy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ single or multiple pregnancy, Outcome 1: Perinatal death ‐ single or multiple pregnancy

Comparison 2: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ single or multiple pregnancy, Outcome 2: Neonatal death ‐ single or multiple pregnancy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ single or multiple pregnancy, Outcome 2: Neonatal death ‐ single or multiple pregnancy

Comparison 2: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ single or multiple pregnancy, Outcome 3: Fetal death ‐ single or multiple pregnancy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ single or multiple pregnancy, Outcome 3: Fetal death ‐ single or multiple pregnancy

Comparison 2: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ single or multiple pregnancy, Outcome 4: Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ single or multiple pregnancy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ single or multiple pregnancy, Outcome 4: Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ single or multiple pregnancy

Comparison 2: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ single or multiple pregnancy, Outcome 5: Intraventricular haemorrhage ‐ single or multiple pregnancy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ single or multiple pregnancy, Outcome 5: Intraventricular haemorrhage ‐ single or multiple pregnancy

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 1: Perinatal death ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 1: Perinatal death ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 2: Neonatal deaths ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 2: Neonatal deaths ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 3: Fetal death ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 3: Fetal death ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 4: RDS ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 4: RDS ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 5: IVH ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 5: IVH ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 6: Birthweight ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 6: Birthweight ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 7: Chorioamnionitis ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 7: Chorioamnionitis ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 8: Endometritis ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose, Outcome 8: Endometritis ‐ intact or ruptured membranes

Comparison 4: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ hypertension syndrome versus all other trials, Outcome 1: Perinatal deaths ‐ hypertension syndrome vs other trials

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ hypertension syndrome versus all other trials, Outcome 1: Perinatal deaths ‐ hypertension syndrome vs other trials

Comparison 4: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ hypertension syndrome versus all other trials, Outcome 2: Neonatal deaths ‐ hypertension syndrome vs other trials

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ hypertension syndrome versus all other trials, Outcome 2: Neonatal deaths ‐ hypertension syndrome vs other trials

Comparison 4: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ hypertension syndrome versus all other trials, Outcome 3: Fetal deaths ‐ hypertension syndrome vs other trials

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ hypertension syndrome versus all other trials, Outcome 3: Fetal deaths ‐ hypertension syndrome vs other trials

Comparison 4: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ hypertension syndrome versus all other trials, Outcome 4: Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ hypertension syndrome vs other trials

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ hypertension syndrome versus all other trials, Outcome 4: Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ hypertension syndrome vs other trials

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 1: Perinatal death ‐ type of steroid

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 1: Perinatal death ‐ type of steroid

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 2: Neonatal death ‐ type of steroid

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 2: Neonatal death ‐ type of steroid

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 3: Fetal death ‐ type of steroid

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 3: Fetal death ‐ type of steroid

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 4: Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ type of steroid

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 4: Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ type of steroid

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 5: Moderate/severe respiratory distress syndrome ‐ type of steroid

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 5: Moderate/severe respiratory distress syndrome ‐ type of steroid

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 6: Chronic lung disease ‐ type of steroid

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 6: Chronic lung disease ‐ type of steroid

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 7: IVH ‐ type of steroid

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.7

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 7: IVH ‐ type of steroid

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 8: Birthweight ‐ type of steroid

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.8

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 8: Birthweight ‐ type of steroid

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 9: Chorioamnionitis ‐ type of steroid

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.9

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 9: Chorioamnionitis ‐ type of steroid

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 10: Endometritis ‐ type of steroid

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.10

Comparison 5: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid, Outcome 10: Endometritis ‐ type of steroid

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 1: Perinatal death ‐ decade of trial

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 1: Perinatal death ‐ decade of trial

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 2: Neonatal death ‐ decade of trial

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 2: Neonatal death ‐ decade of trial

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 3: Fetal death ‐ decade of trial

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 3: Fetal death ‐ decade of trial

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 4: Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ decade of trial

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 4: Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ decade of trial

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 5: IVH ‐ decade of trial

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.5

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 5: IVH ‐ decade of trial

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 6: Birthweight ‐ decade of trial

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.6

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 6: Birthweight ‐ decade of trial

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 7: Chorioamnionitis ‐ decade of trial

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.7

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 7: Chorioamnionitis ‐ decade of trial

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 8: Endometritis ‐ decade of trial

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.8

Comparison 6: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial, Outcome 8: Endometritis ‐ decade of trial

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 1: Perinatal death ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 1: Perinatal death ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 2: Neonatal death ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 2: Neonatal death ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 3: Fetal death ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.3

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 3: Fetal death ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 4: Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.4

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 4: Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 5: Moderate/severe respiratory distress syndrome

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.5

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 5: Moderate/severe respiratory distress syndrome

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 6: IVH ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.6

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 6: IVH ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 7: Birthweight ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.7

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 7: Birthweight ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 8: Chorioamnionitis ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.8

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 8: Chorioamnionitis ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 9: Endometritis ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.9

Comparison 7: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats, Outcome 9: Endometritis ‐ protocol with weekly repeats

Comparison 8: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry, Outcome 1: Perinatal death ‐ gestational age at trial entry

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry, Outcome 1: Perinatal death ‐ gestational age at trial entry

Comparison 8: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry, Outcome 2: Neonatal death ‐ gestational age at trial entry

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.2

Comparison 8: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry, Outcome 2: Neonatal death ‐ gestational age at trial entry

Comparison 8: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry, Outcome 3: Fetal death ‐ gestational age at trial entry

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.3

Comparison 8: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry, Outcome 3: Fetal death ‐ gestational age at trial entry

Comparison 8: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry, Outcome 4: Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ gestational age at trial entry

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.4

Comparison 8: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry, Outcome 4: Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ gestational age at trial entry

Comparison 8: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry, Outcome 5: IVH ‐ gestational age at trial entry

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.5

Comparison 8: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry, Outcome 5: IVH ‐ gestational age at trial entry

Comparison 8: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry, Outcome 6: Birthweight ‐ gestational age at trial entry

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.6

Comparison 8: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry, Outcome 6: Birthweight ‐ gestational age at trial entry

Comparison 8: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry, Outcome 7: Chorioamnionitis ‐ gestational age at trial entry

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.7

Comparison 8: Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry, Outcome 7: Chorioamnionitis ‐ gestational age at trial entry

Summary of findings 1. Neonatal and child outcomes: corticosteroids compared to placebo or no treatment for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth

Neonatal and child outcomes: corticosteroids compared to placebo or no treatment for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth

Patient or population: infants born of women at risk of preterm birth
Setting: hospitals settings in low‐, middle‐ and high‐resource countries
Intervention: corticosteroids
Comparison: placebo or no treatment

Outcomes

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

What happens

Without Corticosteroids

With Corticosteroids

Difference

Perinatal death (composite of fetal death (in utero death) and neonatal death)
№ of participants: 9833
(14 RCTs)

RR 0.85
(0.77 to 0.93)

Study population

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

Corticosteroids reduce perinatal death compared with placebo or no treatment.

15.6%

13.3%
(12 to 14.6)

2.3% fewer
(3.6 fewer to 1.1 fewer)

Neonatal death (infants born with signs of life who die within the first 28 days)
№ of participants: 10,609
(22 RCTs)

RR 0.78
(0.70 to 0.87)

Study population

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

Corticosteroids reduce neonatal death compared with placebo or no treatment.

11.9%

9.3%
(8.3 to 10.3)

2.6% fewer
(3.6 fewer to 1.5 fewer)

Respiratory distress syndrome
№ of participants: 11,183
(26 RCTs)

RR 0.71
(0.65 to 0.78)

Study population

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

Corticosteroids reduce respiratory distress syndrome compared with placebo or no treatment.

We did not downgrade for risk of bias (two trials) at high risk of bias due to lack of placebo in control) because sensitivity analysis removing those trials made very little difference to the effect estimate.

14.8%

10.5%
(9.6 to 11.5)

4.3% fewer
(5.2 fewer to 3.2 fewer)

Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH)
№ of participants: 8475
(12 RCTs)

RR 0.58
(0.45 to 0.75)

Study population

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

Corticosteroids probably reduce intraventricular haemorrhage compared with placebo or no treatment.

We did not downgrade for risk of bias (four trials infants) at high risk of bias due to lack of placebo in control groups) because sensitivity analysis removing those trials made very little difference to the effect estimate.

3.3%

1.9%
(1.5 to 2.5)

1.4% fewer
(1.8 fewer to 0.8 fewer)

Mean birthweight (g)
№ of participants: 9551
(19 RCTs)

The mean birthweight in the control group ranged from 941 g to 2654 g

MD 14.02 lower
(33.79 lower to 5.76 higher)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

Corticosteroids result in little to no difference in mean birthweight compared with placebo or no treatment.

We did not downgrade for risk of bias (two trials at high risk of bias due to incomplete outcome data) because sensitivity analysis removing those trials made very little difference to the effect estimate.

We did not downgrade for imprecision because the confidence interval showed a difference at most on average of 33 g in weight, which is less than 10% of the lightest mean weight in any trial.

Developmental delay in childhood
№ of participants: 600 (3 RCTs).

Age at follow‐up: 2 to 12 years.

RR 0.51 (0.27 to 0.97)

7.7%

4.0%

(2.1 to 7.5)

3.8% fewer

(5.7 fewer to 0.2 fewer)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 2

Corticosteroids probably lead to a slight reduction in developmental delay in childhood compared with placebo or no treatment.

Additionally, in three studies (778 children) it was uncertain if corticosteroids had any effect on intellectual impairment (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.69). In two studies (166 children) it was uncertain if corticosteroids had any effect on the risk of visual impairment (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.23) and in one study (82 children) it was uncertain if corticosteroids have any effect on hearing impairment (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.04 to 9.87). Another study reported no children with hearing impairment in either group (84 children).

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1 Downgraded one level for indirectness: in some trials only a subset of infants were screened for IVH; some trials diagnosed IVH at postmortem only.

2 Downgraded one level for risk of bias: unclear randomisation, allocation concealment, incomplete outcome data and selective reporting

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 1. Neonatal and child outcomes: corticosteroids compared to placebo or no treatment for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth
Summary of findings 2. Maternal outcomes: corticosteroids compared to placebo or no treatment for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth

Maternal outcomes: corticosteroids compared to placebo or no treatment for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth

Patient or population: women at risk of preterm birth
Setting: hospitals settings in low‐, middle‐ and high‐resource countries
Intervention: corticosteroids
Comparison: placebo or no treatment

Outcomes

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

What happens

Without Corticosteroids

With Corticosteroids

Difference

Maternal death
follow up: 90 days
№ of participants: 6244
(6 RCTs)

RR 1.19
(0.36 to 3.89)

Study population

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

Corticosteroids probably result in little to no difference in maternal death, but the wide 95% CI includes possible benefit and possible harm, compared to placebo or no treatment.

Four studies (3174 women) reported zero deaths in either arm.

0.2%

0.2%
(0.1 to 0.6)

0.0% fewer (0.1 fewer to 0.5 more)

Chorioamnionitis
№ of participants: 8374
(15 RCTs)

RR 0.86
(0.69 to 1.08)

Study population

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 2

Corticosteroids probably make little to no difference to the risk of chorioamnionitis but the wide 95% CI includes possible benefit and possible harm, compared to placebo/no treatment.

3.5%

3.0%
(2.4 to 3.8)

0.5% fewer
(1.1 fewer to 0.3 more)

Endometritis
№ of participants: 6764
(10 RCTs)

RR 1.14
(0.82 to 1.58)

Study population

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

Corticosteroids probably make little to no difference to the risk of endometritis but the wide 95% CI includes possible benefit and possible harm, compared to placebo/no treatment.

1.8%

2.1%
(1.5 to 2.9)

0.3% more
(0.3 fewer to 1.1 more)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio,

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1 Downgraded one level for imprecision: few events and wide 95% CI that includes possible benefit and possible harm

2 Downgraded one level for imprecision: wide 95% CI that includes possible benefit and possible harm

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Maternal outcomes: corticosteroids compared to placebo or no treatment for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth
Table 1. Gestational age parameters for included trials

Trial

Minimum

(weeks+days)

Maximum

(weeks+days)

Amorim 1999

28+0

34+6

Attawattanakul 2015

34+0

36+6

Balci 2010

34+0

36+6

Block 1977

Not reported

36+6

Collaborative 1981

26+0

37+0

Dexiprom 1999

28+0

34+6

Fekih 2002
 

26+0

34+6
 

Gamsu 1989

Not reported

34+6

Garite 1992

24+0

27+6

Gyamfi‐Bannerman 2016

34+0

36+6

Kari 1994
 

24+0

31+6
 

Lewis 1996

24+0

34+6

Liggins 1972b

24+0

36+6

Lopez 1989

27+0

35+0

Mansouri 2010

35+0

36+6

Morales 1989

26+0

34+6

Morrison 1978

Not reported

34+0

Nelson 1985

28+0

34+6

Ontela 2018

34+0

36+6

Porto 2011

34+0

36+6

Qublan 2001

27+0

34+6

Schutte 1980

26+0

32+6

Schmidt 1984

26+0

32+0

Shanks 2010

34+0

36+6

Silver 1996

24+0

29+6

Teramo 1980

28+0

35+6

WHO 2020

26+0

33+6

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Gestational age parameters for included trials
Comparison 1. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Perinatal death Show forest plot

14

9833

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.77, 0.93]

1.2 Neonatal death Show forest plot

22

10609

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.70, 0.87]

1.3 Fetal death Show forest plot

14

9833

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.83, 1.22]

1.4 Respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

26

11183

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.65, 0.78]

1.5 Moderate/severe respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

7

4874

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.59, 0.83]

1.6 Chronic lung disease Show forest plot

5

745

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.41, 1.79]

1.7 Intraventricular haemorrhage Show forest plot

12

8475

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.45, 0.75]

1.7.1 Any IVH grade

5

720

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.45, 0.84]

1.7.2 IVH Grade 3‐4

5

6269

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.27, 0.88]

1.7.3 IVH diagnosed at postmortem

2

1486

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.34, 1.06]

1.8 Mean birthweight (g) Show forest plot

19

9551

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐14.02 [‐33.79, 5.76]

1.9 Maternal death Show forest plot

6

6244

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.36, 3.89]

1.10 Chorioamnionitis Show forest plot

15

8374

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.69, 1.08]

1.11 Endometritis Show forest plot

10

6764

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.82, 1.58]

1.12 Death in childhood Show forest plot

4

1010

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.36, 1.27]

1.13 Neurodevelopmental disability in childhood Show forest plot

5

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.13.1 Developmental delay

3

600

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.27, 0.97]

1.13.2 Intellectual impairment

3

778

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.44, 1.69]

1.13.3 Hearing impairment

2

166

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.04, 9.87]

1.13.4 Visual impairment

2

166

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.24, 1.23]

1.14 Death into adulthood Show forest plot

1

988

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.56, 1.81]

1.15 Neurodevelopmental disability in adulthood Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.15.1 Visual impairment

1

192

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.53, 1.55]

1.15.2 Hearing impairment

1

192

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.03, 2.03]

1.15.3 Intellectual impairment

2

273

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.01, 4.95]

1.16 Fever in women after trial entry requiring the use of antibiotics Show forest plot

3

363

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.36, 1.21]

1.17 Intrapartum fever in woman requiring the use of antibiotics Show forest plot

2

319

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.15, 2.49]

1.18 Postnatal fever in woman Show forest plot

5

1323

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.64, 1.33]

1.19 Admission into adult intensive care unit Show forest plot

2

319

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.26, 2.05]

1.20 Side effects of therapy in women Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.20.1 Any side effects at first dose

1

2825

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.59, 0.82]

1.20.2 Dyspnoea

1

2828

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.15]

1.20.3 Gastrointestinal upset

1

2828

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.99 [0.12, 73.37]

1.20.4 Hyperglycaemia

1

2828

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.15]

1.20.5 Leucocytosis

1

2828

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.15]

1.20.6 Migraine

1

2828

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.06, 15.93]

1.21 Glucose intolerance Show forest plot

1

123

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.71 [1.14, 6.46]

1.22 Hypertension Show forest plot

2

288

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.59, 1.79]

1.23 Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes Show forest plot

12

5727

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.78, 0.98]

1.24 Mean interval between trial entry and birth (days) Show forest plot

3

1513

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.23 [‐1.86, 2.32]

1.25 Mean length at birth (cm) Show forest plot

1

2766

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.00 [‐0.37, 0.37]

1.26 Mean head circumference at birth (cm) Show forest plot

1

2766

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.00 [‐0.22, 0.22]

1.27 Small‐for‐gestational age Show forest plot

5

3478

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.96, 1.28]

1.28 Admission to neonatal intensive care unit Show forest plot

9

6667

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.91, 1.00]

1.29 Need for mechanical ventilation/CPAP Show forest plot

11

4519

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.66, 0.84]

1.30 Mean duration of mechanical ventilation/CPAP (days) Show forest plot

3

471

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.91 [‐4.59, 0.76]

1.31 Median (IQR) duration of mechanical ventilation (hours) Show forest plot

1

Other data

No numeric data

1.32 Median (IQR) duration of CPAP (hours) Show forest plot

1

Other data

No numeric data

1.33 Air leak syndrome Show forest plot

2

2965

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.32, 1.80]

1.34 Mean duration of oxygen supplementation (hours) Show forest plot

1

73

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.86 [‐5.51, ‐0.21]

1.35 Median (IQR) duration of oxygen supplementation (hours) Show forest plot

1

Other data

No numeric data

1.36 Surfactant use Show forest plot

6

6104

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.50, 0.85]

1.37 Systemic infection in the first 48 hours of life Show forest plot

7

1708

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.41, 0.88]

1.38 Proven infection while in the neonatal intensive care unit Show forest plot

10

5521

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.64, 0.98]

1.39 Necrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

10

4702

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.32, 0.78]

1.40 Mean infant HPA axis function (cortisol) Show forest plot

1

27

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.94 [‐3.12, 11.00]

1.40.1 In babies born < 24 hours after 1st dose

1

6

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.00 [‐11.93, 29.93]

1.40.2 In babies born 24‐48 hours after 1st dose

1

10

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.00 [‐8.68, 8.68]

1.40.3 In babies born > 48 hours after 1st dose

1

11

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

13.00 [‐1.90, 27.90]

1.41 Mean childhood weight (kg) Show forest plot

2

333

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [‐0.39, 1.00]

1.41.1 Liggins

1

250

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [‐0.32, 1.12]

1.41.2 Schutte (females)

1

39

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.40 [‐6.55, 1.75]

1.41.3 Schutte (males)

1

44

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐3.88, 3.68]

1.42 Mean childhood head circumference (cm) Show forest plot

2

328

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [‐0.08, 0.63]

1.42.1 Liggins

1

250

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [‐0.11, 0.71]

1.42.2 Schutte (females)

1

36

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐1.05, 0.85]

1.42.3 Schutte (males)

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [‐0.51, 1.71]

1.43 Mean childhood height (cm) Show forest plot

2

334

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [‐0.26, 2.29]

1.43.1 Liggins

1

250

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [‐0.39, 2.39]

1.43.2 Schutte (females)

1

39

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.70 [‐3.08, 6.48]

1.43.3 Schutte (males)

1

45

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [‐3.79, 4.99]

1.44 Mean childhood systolic blood pressure (mmHg) Show forest plot

1

223

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.60 [‐4.06, 0.86]

1.45 Cerebral palsy in childhood Show forest plot

5

904

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.34, 1.03]

1.46 Behavioural/learning difficulties in childhood Show forest plot

1

90

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.35, 2.09]

1.47 Mean adult weight (kg) Show forest plot

2

538

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.83 [‐6.41, 4.76]

1.47.1 Schutte (females)

1

37

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐6.00 [‐12.93, 0.93]

1.47.2 Schutte (males)

1

43

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.00 [‐9.91, 7.91]

1.47.3 Liggins

1

458

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.57 [‐0.72, 5.86]

1.48 Mean adult head circumference (cm) Show forest plot

2

537

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.33, 0.38]

1.48.1 Schutte (females)

1

37

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.00 [‐1.03, 1.03]

1.48.2 Schutte (males)

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.20 [‐1.37, 0.97]

1.48.3 Liggins

1

458

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [‐0.34, 0.46]

1.49 Mean adult height (cm) Show forest plot

2

537

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [‐0.28, 2.10]

1.49.1 Schutte (females)

1

36

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.00 [‐5.37, 3.37]

1.49.2 Schutte (males)

1

43

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.00 [‐2.30, 8.30]

1.49.3 Liggins (females)

1

234

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [‐0.65, 2.99]

1.49.4 Liggins (males)

1

224

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [‐1.03, 2.53]

1.50 Mean adult skinfold thickness (log values) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.50.1 Triceps

1

456

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.02 [‐0.11, 0.07]

1.50.2 Biceps

1

456

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.11, 0.09]

1.50.3 Subscapular

1

441

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.08, 0.10]

1.50.4 Suprailiac

1

452

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.12, 0.10]

1.51 Abnormal lung function measured as forced vital capacity (adult) Show forest plot

1

383

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.70 [‐3.16, 1.76]

1.52 Mean adult systolic blood pressure (mmHg) Show forest plot

2

545

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.87 [‐2.81, 1.07]

1.52.1 Schutte (females)

1

38

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.00 [‐9.12, 1.12]

1.52.2 Schutte (males)

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.00 [‐7.17, 1.17]

1.52.3 Liggins

1

455

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.55 [‐1.88, 2.98]

1.53 Mean adult insulin (log values) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.53.1 Fasting

1

435

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.08 [‐0.03, 0.19]

1.53.2 30 minutes fasting following a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test

1

412

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.16 [0.04, 0.28]

1.53.3 120 minutes following a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test

1

428

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐0.27, 0.07]

1.54 Mean adult glucose Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.54.1 Fasting

1

432

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.09, 0.11]

1.54.2 30 minutes fasting following a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test

1

413

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [‐0.12, 0.54]

1.54.3 120 minutes following a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test

1

410

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.27 [‐0.52, ‐0.02]

1.55 Mean adult HPA axis function (mean log fasting cortisol) Show forest plot

1

444

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [‐0.02, 0.14]

1.56 Mean age at puberty (years) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.56.1 Schutte (females)

1

38

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.00 [‐0.94, 0.94]

1.57 Educational achievement by adulthood (university or polytechnic education) Show forest plot

1

534

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.80, 1.10]

1.58 Mean length of antenatal hospitalisation (days) Show forest plot

2

412

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.00 [‐0.23, 0.22]

1.59 Length of maternal hospital stay Show forest plot

4

Other data

No numeric data

1.60 Mean length of postnatal hospitalisation (days) Show forest plot

1

218

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.00 [‐1.72, 1.72]

1.61 Mean length of neonatal hospitalisation (days) Show forest plot

5

788

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [‐0.51, 0.87]

1.62 Length of neonatal hospitalisation Show forest plot

2

Other data

No numeric data

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment
Comparison 2. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ single or multiple pregnancy

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

2.1 Perinatal death ‐ single or multiple pregnancy Show forest plot

14

9833

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.77, 0.93]

2.1.1 In babies born from singleton pregnancies

7

5492

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.70, 0.99]

2.1.2 In babies born from multiple pregnancies

2

252

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.41, 1.22]

2.1.3 Mixed population

7

4089

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.77, 0.96]

2.2 Neonatal death ‐ single or multiple pregnancy Show forest plot

22

10609

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.70, 0.87]

2.2.1 In babies born from singleton pregnancies

13

8453

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.71, 0.91]

2.2.2 In babies born from multiple pregnancies

3

813

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.57, 1.02]

2.2.3 Mixed population

9

1343

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.50, 0.90]

2.3 Fetal death ‐ single or multiple pregnancy Show forest plot

14

9833

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.83, 1.21]

2.3.1 In babies born from singleton pregnancies

7

5492

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.76, 1.46]

2.3.2 In babies born from multiple pregnancies

2

252

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.20, 1.40]

2.3.3 Mixed population

7

4089

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.80, 1.29]

2.4 Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ single or multiple pregnancy Show forest plot

26

11183

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.65, 0.78]

2.4.1 In babies born from singleton pregnancies

17

6731

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.57, 0.74]

2.4.2 In babies born from multiple pregnancies

4

323

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.61, 1.20]

2.4.3 Mixed population

9

4129

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.68, 0.92]

2.5 Intraventricular haemorrhage ‐ single or multiple pregnancy Show forest plot

12

8475

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.45, 0.75]

2.5.1 In babies born from singleton pregnancies

6

4494

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.35, 0.75]

2.5.2 In babies born from multiple pregnancies

1

150

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.08, 2.26]

2.5.3 Mixed population

6

3831

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.48, 0.94]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ single or multiple pregnancy
Comparison 3. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

3.1 Perinatal death ‐ intact or ruptured membranes Show forest plot

14

9804

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.77, 0.93]

3.1.1 In babies born from pregnancies with intact membranes at 1st dose

4

1332

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.71, 1.10]

3.1.2 In babies born from pregnancies with ruptured membranes at 1st dose

3

688

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.47, 0.83]

3.1.3 Not reported or mixed population

8

7784

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.78, 0.97]

3.2 Neonatal deaths ‐ intact or ruptured membranes Show forest plot

22

10580

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.70, 0.87]

3.2.1 In babies born from pregnancies with intact membranes at 1st dose

4

1332

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.60, 1.05]

3.2.2 In babies born from pregnancies with ruptured membranes at 1st dose

7

1014

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.46, 0.84]

3.2.3 Not reported or mixed population

12

8234

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.71, 0.91]

3.3 Fetal death ‐ intact or ruptured membranes Show forest plot

14

9804

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.83, 1.22]

3.3.1 In babies born from pregnancies with intact membranes at 1st dose

4

1332

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.73, 1.64]

3.3.2 In babies born from pregnancies with ruptured membranes at 1st dose

3

688

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.46, 1.61]

3.3.3 Not reported or mixed population

8

7784

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.80, 1.26]

3.4 RDS ‐ intact or ruptured membranes Show forest plot

26

11079

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.64, 0.78]

3.4.1 In babies born from pregnancies with intact membranes at 1st dose

8

1924

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.50, 0.71]

3.4.2 In babies born from pregnancies with ruptured membranes at 1st dose

10

1202

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.60, 0.87]

3.4.3 Not reported or mixed population

13

7953

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.67, 0.88]

3.5 IVH ‐ intact or ruptured membranes Show forest plot

12

8446

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.45, 0.75]

3.5.1 In babies born from pregnancies with intact membranes at 1st dose

4

1332

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.28, 0.66]

3.5.2 In babies born from pregnancies with ruptured membranes at 1st dose

4

722

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.28, 0.79]

3.5.3 Not reported or mixed population

5

6392

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.64, 1.38]

3.6 Birthweight ‐ intact or ruptured membranes Show forest plot

19

9522

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐14.86 [‐34.59, 4.87]

3.6.1 In babies born from pregnancies with intact membranes at 1st dose

4

1301

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐30.27 [‐100.43, 39.89]

3.6.2 In babies born from pregnancies with ruptured membranes at 1st dose

5

835

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐49.72 [‐113.91, 14.46]

3.6.3 Not reported or mixed population

11

7386

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐9.40 [‐31.10, 12.30]

3.7 Chorioamnionitis ‐ intact or ruptured membranes Show forest plot

15

8345

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.70, 1.09]

3.7.1 In women with intact membranes at 1st dose

4

1243

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.50, 1.40]

3.7.2 In women with ruptured membranes at 1st dose

7

1129

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.72, 1.48]

3.7.3 Not reported or mixed population

5

5973

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.54, 1.09]

3.8 Endometritis ‐ intact or ruptured membranes Show forest plot

10

6764

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.82, 1.58]

3.8.1 In women with intact membranes at 1st dose

2

289

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.61, 2.00]

3.8.2 In women with ruptured membranes at 1st dose

4

477

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.55, 2.25]

3.8.3 Not reported or mixed population

5

5998

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.73, 1.87]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ intact membranes versus ruptured membranes at first dose
Comparison 4. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ hypertension syndrome versus all other trials

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

4.1 Perinatal deaths ‐ hypertension syndrome vs other trials Show forest plot

14

9833

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.77, 0.93]

4.1.1 Hypertension syndrome

2

313

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.57, 1.20]

4.1.2 No hypertension syndrome or hypertension syndromes excluded

1

1123

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.67, 1.10]

4.1.3 Hypertension not reported separately

12

8397

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.76, 0.94]

4.2 Neonatal deaths ‐ hypertension syndrome vs other trials Show forest plot

22

10609

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.70, 0.87]

4.2.1 Hypertension syndrome

2

313

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.28, 0.83]

4.2.2 No hypertension syndrome or hypertension syndromes excluded

1

1123

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.65, 1.25]

4.2.3 Hypertension not reported separately

20

9173

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.70, 0.88]

4.3 Fetal deaths ‐ hypertension syndrome vs other trials Show forest plot

14

9833

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.83, 1.22]

4.3.1 Women with hypertension syndrome

3

331

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.73 [0.91, 3.28]

4.3.2 No hypertension syndrome or hypertension syndromes excluded

2

1373

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.49, 1.12]

4.3.3 Hypertension not reported separately

11

8129

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.83, 1.30]

4.4 Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ hypertension syndrome vs other trials Show forest plot

26

11183

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.65, 0.78]

4.4.1 Hypertension syndrome

5

418

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.34, 0.69]

4.4.2 No hypertension syndrome or hypertension syndromes excluded

7

2511

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.48, 0.74]

4.4.3 Hypertension not reported separately

19

8254

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.70, 0.87]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ hypertension syndrome versus all other trials
Comparison 5. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

5.1 Perinatal death ‐ type of steroid Show forest plot

14

9833

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.77, 0.93]

5.1.1 Dexamethasone

6

4673

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.77, 0.95]

5.1.2 Betamethasone

8

5092

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.69, 0.99]

5.1.3 Methylprednisolone

1

68

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.54 [0.43, 5.43]

5.2 Neonatal death ‐ type of steroid Show forest plot

22

10609

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.70, 0.87]

5.2.1 Dexamethasone

7

4769

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.71, 0.91]

5.2.2 Betamethasone

14

5593

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.59, 0.89]

5.2.3 Hydrocortisone

2

152

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.20, 1.47]

5.2.4 Methylprednisolone

2

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.42, 3.12]

5.3 Fetal death ‐ type of steroid Show forest plot

14

9833

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.83, 1.21]

5.3.1 Dexamethasone

6

4673

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.78, 1.25]

5.3.2 Betamethasone

8

5092

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.74, 1.42]

5.3.3 Methylprednisolone

1

68

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.00 [0.08, 47.36]

5.4 Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ type of steroid Show forest plot

26

11183

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.65, 0.78]

5.4.1 Dexamethasone

8

4963

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.70, 0.92]

5.4.2 Betamethasone

17

5973

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.55, 0.72]

5.4.3 Hydrocortisone

2

152

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.36, 1.28]

5.4.4 Methylprednisolone

2

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.56, 2.27]

5.5 Moderate/severe respiratory distress syndrome ‐ type of steroid Show forest plot

7

4874

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.59, 0.83]

5.5.1 Dexamethasone

2

3166

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.67, 1.03]

5.5.2 Betamethasone

5

1655

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.37, 0.67]

5.5.3 Hydrocortisone

1

26

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.47 [0.32, 6.63]

5.5.4 Methylprednisolone

1

27

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.26, 5.31]

5.6 Chronic lung disease ‐ type of steroid Show forest plot

5

745

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.41, 1.79]

5.6.1 Dexamethasone

2

285

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.94 [0.41, 9.16]

5.6.2 Betamethasone

3

460

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.21, 1.42]

5.7 IVH ‐ type of steroid Show forest plot

12

8475

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.45, 0.75]

5.7.1 Dexamethasone

4

3494

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.54, 1.13]

5.7.2 Betamethasone

8

4981

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.34, 0.68]

5.8 Birthweight ‐ type of steroid Show forest plot

19

9551

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐14.02 [‐33.79, 5.76]

5.8.1 Dexamethasone

6

3972

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.84 [‐31.09, 38.76]

5.8.2 Betamethasone

12

5401

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐20.40 [‐44.61, 3.81]

5.8.3 Hydrocortisone

2

151

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐146.68 [‐371.30, 77.93]

5.8.4 Methylprednisolone

1

27

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐121.00 [‐430.59, 188.59]

5.9 Chorioamnionitis ‐ type of steroid Show forest plot

15

8374

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.69, 1.08]

5.9.1 Dexamethasone

6

3621

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.20 [0.84, 1.71]

5.9.2 Betamethasone

9

4753

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.51, 0.93]

5.10 Endometritis ‐ type of steroid Show forest plot

10

6764

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.82, 1.58]

5.10.1 Dexamethasone

4

3270

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.63 [0.92, 2.90]

5.10.2 Betamethasone

6

3494

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.63, 1.42]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ type of steroid
Comparison 6. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

6.1 Perinatal death ‐ decade of trial Show forest plot

14

9833

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.77, 0.93]

6.1.1 Trials conducted in 1970s

5

2520

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.74, 1.06]

6.1.2 Trials conducted in 1980s

1

77

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.59, 2.21]

6.1.3 Trials conducted in 1990s

3

615

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.46, 0.97]

6.1.4 Trials conducted in 2000s

2

414

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.31, 0.70]

6.1.5 Trials conducted in 2010s

3

6207

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.79, 0.99]

6.2 Neonatal death ‐ decade of trial Show forest plot

22

10609

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.70, 0.87]

6.2.1 Trials conducted in 1970s

7

2743

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.67, 1.04]

6.2.2 Trials conducted in 1980s

4

326

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.55, 1.49]

6.2.3 Trials conducted in 1990s

5

788

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.40, 0.90]

6.2.4 Trials conducted in 2000s

2

270

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.31, 0.66]

6.2.5 Trials conducted in 2010s

4

6482

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.72, 0.96]

6.3 Fetal death ‐ decade of trial Show forest plot

14

9833

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.83, 1.22]

6.3.1 Trials conducted in 1970s

5

2520

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.69, 1.32]

6.3.2 Trials conducted in 1980s

1

77

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.42 [0.37, 31.41]

6.3.3 Trials conducted in 1990s

3

615

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.49, 2.36]

6.3.4 Trials conducted in 2000s

2

414

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.19, 4.50]

6.3.5 Trials conducted in 2010s

3

6207

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.79, 1.30]

6.4 Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ decade of trial Show forest plot

26

11183

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.65, 0.78]

6.4.1 Trials conducted in 1970s

8

2823

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.54, 0.78]

6.4.2 Trials conducted in 1980s

4

326

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.55, 0.88]

6.4.3 Trials conducted in 1990s

5

788

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.65, 0.92]

6.4.4 Trials conducted in 2000s

5

845

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.26, 0.59]

6.4.5 Trials conducted in 2010s

4

6401

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.69, 0.98]

6.5 IVH ‐ decade of trial Show forest plot

12

8475

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.45, 0.75]

6.5.1 Trials conducted in 1970s

1

1218

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.33, 1.12]

6.5.2 Trials conducted in 1980s

3

510

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.26, 0.81]

6.5.3 Trials conducted in 1990s

4

580

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.44, 0.90]

6.5.4 Trials conducted in 2000s

2

270

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.15, 0.73]

6.5.5 Trials conducted in 2010s

2

5897

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.40 [0.69, 8.31]

6.6 Birthweight ‐ decade of trial Show forest plot

19

9551

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐14.02 [‐33.79, 5.76]

6.6.1 Trials conducted in 1970s

5

1822

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐41.39 [‐110.05, 27.26]

6.6.2 Trials conducted in 1980s

3

280

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐19.60 [‐108.55, 69.35]

6.6.3 Trials conducted in 1990s

4

569

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐33.13 [‐102.39, 36.13]

6.6.4 Trials conducted in 2000s

3

573

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐20.77 [‐61.95, 20.41]

6.6.5 Trials conducted in 2010s

4

6307

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.82 [‐30.36, 22.72]

6.7 Chorioamnionitis ‐ decade of trial Show forest plot

15

8374

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.69, 1.08]

6.7.1 Trials conducted in 1970s

2

1237

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.46, 1.17]

6.7.2 Trials conducted in 1980s

3

276

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.25, 1.01]

6.7.3 Trials conducted in 1990s

5

731

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.27 [0.85, 1.89]

6.7.4 Trials conducted in 2000s

2

257

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.02 [0.59, 6.95]

6.7.5 Trials conducted in 2010s

3

5873

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.48, 1.11]

6.8 Endometritis ‐ decade of trial Show forest plot

10

6764

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.82, 1.58]

6.8.1 Trials conducted in 1970s

1

101

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.07, 15.86]

6.8.2 Trials conducted in 1980s

1

71

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.30 [0.88, 6.06]

6.8.3 Trials conducted in 1990s

4

574

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.53, 1.44]

6.8.4 Trials conducted in 2000s

4

6018

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [0.75, 2.03]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ decade of trial
Comparison 7. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

7.1 Perinatal death ‐ protocol with weekly repeats Show forest plot

14

9833

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.77, 0.93]

7.1.1 Single course only

10

6329

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.74, 1.04]

7.1.2 Courses including weekly repeats

4

3504

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.75, 0.93]

7.2 Neonatal death ‐ protocol with weekly repeats Show forest plot

22

10609

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.70, 0.87]

7.2.1 Single course only

14

6636

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.68, 1.02]

7.2.2 Courses including weekly repeats

8

3973

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.67, 0.86]

7.3 Fetal death ‐ protocol with weekly repeats Show forest plot

14

9833

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.83, 1.22]

7.3.1 Single course only

10

6329

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.70, 1.31]

7.3.2 Courses including weekly repeats

4

3504

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.82, 1.31]

7.4 Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ protocol with weekly repeats Show forest plot

26

11183

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.65, 0.78]

7.4.1 Single course only

18

7210

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.64, 0.83]

7.4.2 Courses including weekly repeats

8

3973

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.60, 0.79]

7.5 Moderate/severe respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

7

4874

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.59, 0.83]

7.5.1 Single course only

3

1359

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.47, 0.88]

7.5.2 Courses including weekly repeats

4

3515

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.59, 0.89]

7.6 IVH ‐ protocol with weekly repeats Show forest plot

12

8475

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.45, 0.75]

7.6.1 Single course only

4

4502

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.37, 0.91]

7.6.2 Courses including weekly repeats

8

3973

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.43, 0.79]

7.7 Birthweight ‐ protocol with weekly repeats Show forest plot

19

9551

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐14.02 [‐33.79, 5.76]

7.7.1 Single course only

14

6165

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐20.90 [‐44.39, 2.60]

7.7.2 Courses including weekly repeats

5

3386

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.72 [‐33.92, 39.36]

7.8 Chorioamnionitis ‐ protocol with weekly repeats Show forest plot

15

8374

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.69, 1.08]

7.8.1 Single courses only

7

4659

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.61, 1.11]

7.8.2 Courses including weekly repeats

8

3715

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.65, 1.28]

7.9 Endometritis ‐ protocol with weekly repeats Show forest plot

10

6764

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.82, 1.58]

7.9.1 Single courses only

4

3332

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.49, 1.39]

7.9.2 Courses including weekly repeats

6

3432

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.43 [0.94, 2.19]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ weekly repeats
Comparison 8. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

8.1 Perinatal death ‐ gestational age at trial entry Show forest plot

14

9833

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.77, 0.92]

8.1.1 Less than or equal to 35 weeks + 0 days

11

6185

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.76, 0.91]

8.1.2 Greater than or equal to 34 weeks + 0 days

4

3648

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.70 [0.68, 4.28]

8.2 Neonatal death ‐ gestational age at trial entry Show forest plot

22

10609

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.70, 0.86]

8.2.1 Less than or equal to 35 weeks + 0 days

19

6961

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.69, 0.86]

8.2.2 Greater than or equal to 34 weeks + 0 days

4

3648

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.51 [0.49, 4.61]

8.3 Fetal death ‐ gestational age at trial entry Show forest plot

14

9833

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.83, 1.20]

8.3.1 Less than or equal to 35 weeks + 0 days

11

6185

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.81, 1.19]

8.3.2 Greater than or equal to 34 weeks + 0 days

4

3648

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.92 [0.42, 8.82]

8.4 Respiratory distress syndrome ‐ gestational age at trial entry Show forest plot

26

11183

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.65, 0.78]

8.4.1 Less than or equal to 35 weeks + 0 days

20

7041

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.63, 0.78]

8.4.2 Greater than or equal to 34 weeks + 0 days

7

4142

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.60, 0.95]

8.5 IVH ‐ gestational age at trial entry Show forest plot

12

8475

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.45, 0.74]

8.5.1 Less than or equal to 35 weeks + 0 days

11

5412

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.44, 0.72]

8.5.2 Greater than or equal to 34 weeks + 0 days

2

3063

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.91 [0.24, 102.09]

8.6 Birthweight ‐ gestational age at trial entry Show forest plot

19

9551

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐13.36 [‐32.99, 6.26]

8.6.1 Less than or equal to 35 weeks + 0 days

13

5412

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐9.78 [‐40.81, 21.24]

8.6.2 Greater than or equal to 34 weeks + 0 days

7

4139

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐15.75 [‐41.09, 9.58]

8.7 Chorioamnionitis ‐ gestational age at trial entry Show forest plot

15

8374

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.68, 1.07]

8.7.1 Less than or equal to 35 weeks + 0 days

13

5132

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.73, 1.20]

8.7.2 Greater than or equal to 34 weeks + 0 days

3

3242

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.34, 0.99]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 8. Corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment ‐ gestational age at trial entry