Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

original image
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Comparison 1 IHCA versus Control. Knowledge, Outcome 1 Knowledge [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 IHCA versus Control. Knowledge, Outcome 1 Knowledge [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Comparison 2 IHCA versus Control. Social Support, Outcome 1 Social support [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 IHCA versus Control. Social Support, Outcome 1 Social support [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Comparison 3 IHCA versus Control. Self ‐efficacy, Outcome 1 Self‐efficacy [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 IHCA versus Control. Self ‐efficacy, Outcome 1 Self‐efficacy [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Comparison 4 IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes, Outcome 1 Behavioural outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes, Outcome 1 Behavioural outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Comparison 4 IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes, Outcome 2 Behavioural outcomes [Final Odds Ratios].
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes, Outcome 2 Behavioural outcomes [Final Odds Ratios].

Comparison 5 IHCA versus Control. Clinical outcomes, Outcome 1 Clinical outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 IHCA versus Control. Clinical outcomes, Outcome 1 Clinical outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Table 1. Further Details of Included Studies

Author

Cond/ IHCA

Country

Methods

PPT Characteristics

Follow Up Rate

Details of IHCA

Intervention Group

Control Group

Outcome Measures*

* Outcome measures in capitals were selected for data synthesis.

Andrewes 1996

Eating Disorder / DIET

Australia

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

54 patients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (3rd ed., rev.) (DSM‐III‐R) diagnosed eating disorders: 14 with anorexia, 9 with bulimia, 4 with both in each group. Mean age 22 years. Intervention group n = 27, control group n = 27.

54/54 = 100%

A computer based psychoeducation programme containing 11 information modules about eating disorders plus personal stories.

Completed the DIET programme twice in a healthcare setting with an interval of 7 days between the 1st and 2nd sessions.

Non‐directional computer based counselling programme

Eating Disorders Attitude Questionnaire, EATING DISORDERS KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE, evaluation of computer programme

Bartholomew 2000

Asthma / Watch Discover Think Act ( WDTA)

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

171 children with asthma and their primary caregivers, recruited from inner‐city asthma clinics. 112 males, 59 females; mean age 10.9 years (range 7 to 17 years); 42% Hispanic, 53% African‐American. Of the 133 children who completed the study the intervention group n = 70, control group n = 63.

133 / 171 = 78%. No information about distribution of dropouts.

An interactive multimedia computer game delivered via CD‐ROM, provides tailored information on asthma self‐management for children with asthma. The programme game functions incorporate decision support and behaviour change support. It utilises text, graphics, animation, sound, video clips. Data input = child's personal asthma symptoms, environmental triggers, medications, PEFR.

Played the game during scheduled visits to asthma or community pediatric clinics. Participation time in the study was from 4 to 15.6 months, mean = 7.6 months.

Received no intervention.

CHILD KNOWLEGE OF ASTHMA, CHILD SELF MANAGEMENT, CHILD SELF EFFICACY, symptoms, FUNCTIONAL STATUS and HOSPITALISATION/ ER VISITS

Brennan 1995

Alzhemier's disease / ComputerLink

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

102 caregivers with primary responsibility for a person with Alzheimer's disease. Intervention group n = 51, control group n = 51; 67% female; 72% white participants; median age = 64 years; education = completed high school.

96 / 102 = 94%. 4 dropouts in intervention group; 2 in comparison group.

A specialised computer network, ComputerLink. ComputerLink provides factual information in the form of an electronic encyclopaedia and peer and decision support via online discussion groups and self defined decision problem analysis.

Received in‐home access to ComputerLink via a provided computer link for 12 months.

Received a monthly telephone call.

Decision confidence, decision‐making skill, SOCIAL ISOLATION, DEPRESSION, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Brennan 1998

AIDS & HIV / ComputerLink

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

57 people living with AIDS. Mean age = 33 years; 93% male; 61% white participants; 34% working; mean years of education = 13.5. Intervention group n = 31, control group n = 26

48 / 57 = 84%. 6 dropouts from intervention group; 3 from control group.

A specialised computer network , ComputerLink ComputerLink provides information in the form of an electronic encyclopaedia. Peer support and decIsion support is provided via online discussion groups and a decision support system based on decision modelling.

Received in‐home access to ComputerLink via a provided computer terminal for 6 months.

Received printed brochures and a monthly telephone call to maintain contact with research staff.

Decision making skill, decision confidence, SOCIAL ISOLATION, DEPRESSION, PATIENT HEALTH STATUS

Brown 1997

Diabetes / Packy and Marlon

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

59 children with Diabetes Mellitus, aged 8 to 16, recruited from two paediatric endocrinology outpatient clinics. Intervention group n = 31, control group n = 28

Not stated specifically; results tables suggest 100% follow up.

Interactive computer programme in video game format. The game follows the adventures of two adolescent elephant friends at diabetes summer camp facing threats to their well‐being. Information about self‐care is provided in the form of multiple choice quizzes and behaviour change support is provided through role playing within the game ‐ the characters must engage in specific behaviours to stay healthy. The ability of two players to interact within the camp helps facilitate peer support.

Received in‐home access to a video game system and the video game Packy and Marlon to play on it for a period of 6 months.

Received in‐home access to a video game system and an entertainment video game to play on it for a period of 6 months.

Enjoyment of game scale, SELF EFFICACY MEASURE, SOCIAL SUPPORT, KNOWLEDGE SCORE, DIABETES SELF‐CARE RATING SCALE, HBA1C, NUMBER OF URGENT CARE VISITS

Dragone 2002

Cancer / Kidz with Leukemia

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

41 children aged 4 to 11 with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or acute myeloid leukaemia in first remission. 41 children recruited, 31 completed study, (14 x 4 to 6 year olds; 17 x 7 to 11 year olds); 25/31 white, 3/31 Latino; 1/31 African American; 1 / 31 Asian; 1/31 Other. Of the 31 children completing the study the intervention group n = 15, control group n= 16

31/41 = 76%

An interactive CD‐ROM, delivered via compute to educate children with leukaemia. Information is provided on areas such as treatment, tests, blood cells, anatomy physiology and expert explanations . Behaviour change support is provided with in the Help Yourself module. Miscellaneous topics include sibling view of leukaemia, living with leukaemia.

Received CD‐ROM to use for a 3 month period. Participants could access the CDROM only if they already had a computer at home or had access to one at school or elsewhere .

Received conventional leukaemia information in book format.

Health locus of control, LEUKAEMIA EVENT KNOWLEDGE INTERVIEW, satisfaction and use of computer questionnaires (children and parents)

Glasgow 2003

Diabetes / D‐NET 2003

USA

RCT, 4 arms (control; coach; social support; social support + coach)
For the purpose of systematic review the comparison used = control (information only) vs information + social support.

320 adults with Type II Diabetes Mellitus. 47% male; mean age 59 (SD 9.2 years); 83% had no or very limited Internet experience; mean time since diagnosis 8 years.

264/320 = 82%; 'n' in each arm of trial and follow up numbers by group is not presented. An overall follow up rate of 82% is reported by authors with no significant difference between groups reported. Assuming equal numbers were assigned to each group with an 82 % follow up rate = 80 x 82% = 66 completers per trial arm.

A computer system giving in home access via a providing Internet connection to electronic information on diabetes. Additional modules contain peer support and behaviour change support.

Received information + e‐mail forum (Diabetes Support Conference ‐ peer led but professionally mediated) and some e‐mail focus forums. Home access for 10 months.

Received computer access to electronic articles providing information only about medical, nutritional and lifestyle aspects of diabetes.

DIABETES SUPPORT SCALE, Kristal ffb scale, grams daily fat, AVERAGE MINUTES PER DAY OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, CENTRE FOR EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES ‐ DEPRESSION SCALE, lipid ratio, HBA1C, block nci fat screener

Gorman 1995

Urinary Incontinence / UICS

USA

RCT, 3 arms: UICS versus booklet (AHCPR patient guideline with handout) vs. control. For purposes of systematic review, UICS is compared with control.

60 ambulatory, alert community dwelling women with urinary incontinence defined as accidental urine loss at least twice a week. Mean age = 55, Intervention (UICS) group n = 22, booklet group n= 18, control group n = 20.

60 / 60 = 100%

Computer based expert interactive system containing information about urinary incontinence. Behavioural support provided through bladder training and pelvic muscle exercises.

Used the expert system at a single session arranged by research staff.

Watched a general health video.

EPISODES OF URINARY INCONTINENCE, Incontinence Impact on Life Questionnaire

Guendelman 2002

Asthma / Health Buddy

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

134 children with asthma, recruited from primary care clinic; aged 8 to 16 years, 57% male; 76% African‐American; 93% public insurance. Intervention group n = 66, control group n = 68.

128 / 134 = 96% at 6 weeks; 120/134 = 90% at 12 weeks. Dropouts equally distributed between groups.

A personal, interactive computer programme linked to a secure web site. The programme gives information on asthma via core questions, asthma facts and trivia functions. Behaviour change support is provided immediate feedback giving praise or encourage on answers to questions on asthma self management. query clinical outcome

Accessed the programme at home via a provided telecommunications device for a period of 90 days.

Used a standard asthma diary.

LIMITATION IN ACTIVITY, pefr:50‐80% or <50% of personal best, asthma symptoms, missed school days, functional status, URGENT CALLS TO HOSPITAL, VISITS TO ER, HOSPITALISATION, TAKES ASTHMA MEDICATION WITHOUT REMINDER, reminded to use Health Buddy

Gustafson 1999

AIDS & HIV / CHESS

USA

RCT, 2 arms: CHESS versus control

204 HIV‐positive patients; 90% male; 84% white participants; 65% experiencing HIV‐related symptoms; average education = some college. Intervention group n = 107, control n = 97.

183/204 = 90% (92% in control group; 88% in intervention).

A computer based health support system which provides breast cancer patients with information on their illness via functions such as question and answer facilities and the instant library. Decision support is provided via a decision aid service and peer support via online discussion groups. Behaviour support is delivered in the form of assessment and action plan facilities.

Received in‐home access to CHESS via a provided PC for either 6 (1st cohort) or 3 months (2nd and 3rd cohorts).

Received usual care only.

Cognitive function, negative emotions, DEPRESSION‐MOS SUBSCALE, PHYSICAL FUNCTION, active life, energy, SOCIAL SUPPORT, PARTICIPATION IN HEALTH CARE, USE OF AMBULATORY CARE SERVICES AND HOPITALISATION

Gustafson 2001

Cancer / CHESS

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

295 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, under age 60. Mean age 44.4 years; 74% white participants; 85% private insurance. Intervention group n = 147, control group n= 148.

246 / 295 = 83% (84% in control group; 82% in intervention group).

A computer based health support system which provides HIV‐positive patients with information on their illness via functions such as question and answer facilities and the instant library. Decision support is provided via a decision aid service and peer support via online discussion groups. Behaviour support is delivered in the form of health plan, assessment and action plan facilities.

Received in‐home access to CHESS via a provided PC for 6 months.

Received a copy of Dr Susan Love's Breast Book.

SOCIAL SUPPORT, information competence, unmet information needs, PARTICIPATION ‐ BEHAVIOURAL INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH CARE, participation level of confidence, confidence in doctors, EMOTIONAL WELLBEING ‐ FACT B, breast cancer concerns

Homer 2000

Asthma / Asthma Control

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

137 children aged 3 to 12, with physician‐diagnosed asthma, recruited from hospital (118) and community clinic (19).
Mean age 7.4 years; 30.7% female; 60.5% African‐American, 5.3% Hispanic. Intervention group n = 76, control group n = 61.

106 / 137 = 77% (80% of control group; 75% of intervention group).

An interactive educational computer programme in game format. Children help a superhero complete all 6 levels of game while keeping his asthma under control. General asthma information is provided by the programme as well as behaviour change and decision support facilities.

Used the programme over 3 sessions at either a primary care clinic or a neighbourhood health center. The average time to complete the game for a first time player was 45 to 60 minutes.

Received an asthma education book and played a non‐educational computer game.

CHILD KNOWLEDGE, TOTAL NUMBERS OF EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT AND ACUTE OFFICE VISITS DURING STUDY PERIOD, child's average ASTHMA SPECIFIC SYMPTOM SEVERITY, satisfaction, PEFR METER AVAILABLE, use of pefr meter, monitoring number of common triggers and allergens in home environment

Horan et al 1990

Diabetes / DISC

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

20 adolescents aged 12 to 19 with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus for > 1 year. 30% male; 80% white participants. Recruited from paediatric endocrinologists in private practice and from customers at a store for people with diabetes. Intervention group n = 10, control group n = 10.

20/20 = 100%

A microcomputer based system giving in‐home access via a provided computer terminal. DISC contains 3 components. Information is provided via factual and applied diabetes education; behaviour change support is provided via goal setting; and problem solving functions and facilities for reviewing self monitored data on blood glucose, exercise, diet, emotional stress etc.

Used the computer at home for a period of 15 weeks, spending 7 weeks on the diabetes education model and focusing on the goal‐setting and problem solving module for the last 8 weeks.

Received conventional diabetes education via an education booklet.

HBA1C, blood glucose levels, frequency of smbg, APPLIED DIABETES KNOWLEDGE SCORE, BEHAVIOUR CHANGE ‐ EXERCISE, diet, insulin, emotional stress, physical stress, weight, hormones, alcohol and drugs

Huss 2003

Asthma / Wee Willie Wheezie

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

148 children, recruited from hospital discharge records and local pediatric allergy and asthma clinics. Mean age 9.6 y; 44% male; 21% non‐Hispanic White; 78% non‐Hispanic Black. Intervention group n = 78, control group n = 70.

101 / 148 = 68%. Intervention group = 56/78 = 72%; control group = 45/70 = 64%.

An interactive computer programme in game format where children negotiate Wee Willie through various home‐like environments and hazards. Information is provided via quizzes. Behaviour change support is provided in the form of Wee Willie 'healthline' which responds to environmental triggers or missed medication. An onscreen nurse provides guidance on incorrect answers.

Received conventional education (written asthma materials and a non‐asthma‐related computer programme) and the computer based instructional asthma game ‐ Wee Willie Wheezie. Children played the asthma game for 20 minutes during a scheduled home visit.

Received conventional education: written asthma materials and a non‐asthma‐related computer programme.

SPIROMETRY used to measure pulmonary function, asthma severity measured using NAEPP criteria, Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life, ASTHMA KNOWLEDGE TEST, Air control questionnaire

Krishna 2003

Asthma / Impact

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

246 children (under 18 years) with asthma attending a pediatric pulmonary clinic. 65% male; 86% white participants. Intervention group n = 119, control group n = 127. Only children in the age group 7 to 17 years used the programme independently of carers.

228/246 = 93% (intervention group = 107/119 = 90%; control group = 121/127 = 95%).

An internet‐enabled, interactive multimedia asthma education programme incorporating information and self management skills. Provides behavior change and decision support in its graphic templates containing interactive vignettes.

Received conventional asthma education and used IMPACT during 3 routine visits to an asthma clinic. The program takes approximately 1 hour 20 minutes to complete.

Received conventional asthma education, including verbal and written asthma information on the disease and concepts related to its control.

PEDIATRIC ASTHMA CARE KNOWLEDGE SURVEY FOR CHILDREN (7‐17), caregivers 0‐6, caregivers 7‐17, DAYS WITH ASTHMA SYMPTOMS, days of activity limitation, days of sleep disturbance, school days missed, URGENT VISITS TO THE PHYSICAN, ER VISITS, HOSPITALISATION, DAYS OF STAYS IN HOSPITAL, days of quick relief medicine, use of inhaled steroids

Lehmann 2001

Diabetes / AIDA

Italy

RCT, 2 arms intervention versus control. Partial cross‐over design.

24 adults with Type I Diabetes Mellitus; 50% male. Intervention group n = 12, control group n = 12.

18 / 24 = 75% (67% in control group; 83% in intervention group).

An interactive computer programme accessible via the world wide web. It contains information, behaviour change support and decision support.

Received 6 sessions using AIDA. Sessions lasted an average of 104 minutes. Participants did not interact directly with the computer but via a 'facilitator' as the programme software was written in English.

Received 6 sessions of conventional education (slides) on the same topics. After completing post‐test questionnaires they crossed over to receive 6 sessions on AIDA.

KNOWLEDGE SCORE, social and emotional impact of diabetes on lifestyle, self‐monitoring of blood glucose, forward thinking, well‐being and self‐confidence, hypoglycaemic attacks, HbA1C, empowerment

Mahoney 2002

Alzheimer's disease / Memory Loss CD

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

113 adults concerned about memory loss in a family member; intervention group n = 56, control group n = 57.

113 / 113 = 100%

A computer programme, delivered via a multimedia CD‐ROM. Decision support and peer support are contained within modules on 'Making Plans' and 'Common Family Experiences'.

Used the programme on a project laptop during a home interview with research staff.

Received no intervention and were offered the opportunity to view the CD‐ROM at the end of the research project.

KNOWLEDGE ABOUT MEMORY LOSS IN FAMILY MEMBERS; user satisfaction with the programme; CONTACTS WITH CLINICIANS

Ritterband 2003

Encopresis / U Can Poop Too

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

24 encopretic children; 19 boys; mean age 8.46 years (SD 1.81 years). Intervention group n = 12, control group n = 12.

24 / 24 = 100%

A computer programme delivered via the internet containing three core modules. Two provide information on encopresis and medication. The third provides behaviour change support via a detailed animated tutorial and a personalised instruction sheet.

Received in‐home access to the programme via a provided computer and internet connection. They received the programme for 3 weeks and accessed the website an average of 14 times per participant during that time.

Received phone calls only from research staff.

Bowel habits (child information form), ENCOPRESIS KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE (EKQ), VECAT (assesses bowel‐specific problems related to encopresis), NUMBER OF BOWEL ACCIDENTS PER WEEK, use of internet programme

Shegog 2001

Asthma / Watch Discover Think Act ( WDTA)

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

76 children recruited from clinics and schools; mean age 10.7 years; 47.9% white, non‐Hispanic participants; 40.8% African‐American participants; 7% Hispanic participants; 46 boys. 71 children completed the study of which intervention group n = 38, control n = 33.

71 / 76 = 93%; distribution of dropouts between groups not given.

An interactive multimedia computer game delivered via CD‐ROM. The programme provides intensive, tailored information on self‐management for children with asthma. Text, graphics, animation, sound and video clips are utilised, and behaviour support delivered via verbal reinforcement, guided practice, feedback goal setting and incentives. Data input = child's personal asthma symptoms, environmental triggers, medications, PEFR.

Participants in the intervention group played the game during a session organised at a university‐linked medical centre.

Received no intervention.

KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE ON ASTHMA MANAGEMENT, SELF‐EFFICACY FOR ASTHMA MANAGEMENT, causal attributions, attribution classification, demographic and health information, computer experience, motivation, attitude toward CAL, process of use

Smith 2000

Diabetes / WTW

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

30 women with Diabetes Mellitus (Type I or II); aged 35 to 60 years; with a telephone and living at least 25 miles outside the 6 major cities of Montana. Intervention group n = 15, control group n = 15.

Follow up rate not stated.

A computer programme accessed via a PC with modem connection. The software contained 4 components: conversation (online support group providing peer support ); mailbox (private e‐mail correspondence between group members); HealthChat (formal diabetes education); and Resource Rack (bulletin board).

Received in‐home access to the programme via a provided laptop for 5 months. They also received a notebook of health information regarding women's health in general and specific diabetes information.

Received paper copies of all the information materials that the intervention group received; that is, health information notebook and hard copies of computer‐generated information.

HBA1C, health status, sources of support, PERSONAL RESOURCE QUESTIONNAIRE, Quality of Life Index, Social Readjustment Rating Scale PSYCHOSOCIAL ADAPTION TO ILLNESS SCALE, usage of computer programme

Turnin 1992

Diabetes / Diabeto

France

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control. Crossover design.

105 patients with diabetes. 59% male; 72% Type I Diabetes Mellitus; 74% working; mean age 45 years. Intervention group n = 54, control group = 51.

Follow up rate not stated.

Interactive dietary information and individualised counselling delivered via a Minitel videotext terminal. The programme provides dietetic information for diabetic patients. Behaviour change support is provided via an individualised dossier containing energy requirements calculation and individualised meal analysis options, adapted menus, personalised advice and dietary and cardiovascular information.

Received in‐home access to Diabeto for 6 months.

No intervention for 6 months then crossed over to the intervention arm.

DIETETIC KNOWLEDGE SCORES, eating habits ‐ caloric excess, % of carbohydrate, carbohydrate deficit, REDUCTION OF % FAT OF CALORIFIC INTAKE, fat excess, changes in body weight, HBA1C

Turnin 2001

Obesity / Nutri‐Expert

France

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

557 obese patients: BMI > or equal to 33.3kg / m2. Mean age 41.2 y; 92.3% female; salaried workers 36.5%, unemployed or retired 23.1%, teaching or health care professions 14.1%. Of the 341 participants who completed the study intervention group n = 169, control group n = 172.

341 / 557 = 61%. Dropouts equally distributed between intervention and control group (88 from control group and 91 from intervention group)

Nutrition education software programme on obesity delivered via a Minitel videotext terminal containing information on nutrition for obese patients. Behavior change support is provided by energy requirements calculation and individualised meal analysis options, adapted menus and personalised advice. A discussion forum provides peer support.

Received usual care (7 medical/dietetic visits) plus in‐home access to the software programme via a provided terminal for 12 months.

Received usual care ( 7 medical/dietetic visits).

BMI, waist circumference, weight, DIETETIC KNOWLEDGE SCORES, dietary intake (CALORIFIC INTAKE, carbohydrate, sugar, protein and fat intake), fasting plasma insulin and lipids ‐ cholesterol

Wydra 2001

Cancer / Coping with Cancer

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

174 patients with cancer; 51% male; 81% white participants; age range = 21 to 82 years. Intervention group n = 86, control group n = 88.

160 / 174 = 92%; distribution of dropouts between groups not given.

Interactive Video Disc delivered via a video disc player. Provides information on fatigue, saving and maintaining energy, managing stress and sleeping better. Behaviour change support was provided by self‐management content of the modules eg. exercises to identify side effects, causes and patterns of problems such as fatigue.

Participants in the intervention group used the video disc at a single session in a cancer treatment centre.

Received usual care.

SELF CARE ACTIVITIES, wide range achievement test, self care ability

Wylie‐Rosett 2001

Obesity / CD‐ROM

USA

RCT, 3 arms: workbook only versus workbook + computer programme vs workbook + computer programme + staff counselling. For purposes of systematic review, intervention = computer programme + workbook; control = workbook only.

588 people; mean BMI = 35.6 kg/m2; 82% female; 83% white; 84%> 1yr of college; recruited from a managed care organisation. Workbook only (control group ) n = 116, workbook+computer group (intervention group) n = 236, workbook+computer+staff counselling n= 236. Sample size and n in each arm arrived at by authors in the light of data from studies.

Raw data not given; overall study completion rate given as 81% with dropout rates of 16% (n = 19), 22% (n = 53) and 17% for the least, intermediate and most intensive intervention groups respectively.

A multimedia computer programme providing information on nutrition and fitness. Behavior change support is delivered via psychobehavioural content such as the setting, reviewing and evaluation of chosen tailored behaviour goals on food intake and physical activity.

Participants in the intervention group accessed the programme via touchscreens in kiosks situated within a medical waiting room over a 12 month period. During the first 3 months, participants were asked to log on to the computer system at least once a week and thereafter at least once a month.

Received a workbook containing 20 sections with self‐help sheets.

KCAL PER DAY, % Kcal from fat, blocks walked daily, minutes walked continuously, weight, BMI, waist circumference, % of body fat, cholesterols, triglicerides, glucose, blood pressure, COST ANALYSIS, diabetes and cardiovascular risk, medication usage and evaluation of computer programme

* Outcome measures in capitals were selected for data synthesis.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Further Details of Included Studies
Table 2. Included Studies ‐ outcome data not utilised in meta ‐analyses

Study

Condition / IHCA

Country

Type of Study

Outcome Category

Outcome Measure

Reason for Omission

Brennan 1995

Alzhemier's disease / ComputerLink

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Social Support

Social isolation

This study presented data on carers rather than patients. For this reason data was not included in the social support meta‐analysis. An SMD however has been calculated and is presented in Additional Table 4.

Brennan 1998

Alzheimer's disease / ComputerLink

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Emotional

Depression ‐ CES‐D

Data not presented.

Dragone 2002

Cancer / Kidz with Leukemia

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Knowledge

Leukaemia event knowledge interview

Knowledge: mean and SD not given so not possible to calculate SMD from the data presented.

Gorman 1995

Urinary Incontinence / UICS

USA

RCT, 3 arms: UICS versus booklet (AHCPR patient guideline with handout) vs. control. For purposes of systematic review, UICS is compared with control.

Clinical

Episodes of urinary incontinence over 3 days

Clinical: mean no. of episodes at final assessment only presented. No standard deviations provided so SMD not calculable.

Homer 2000

Asthma / Asthma Control

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Knowledge, Clinical

Knowledge, Asthma Severity Score

Knowledge & Clinical: no standard deviations provided so SMD not calculable.

Horan 1990

Diabetes / DISC

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Clinical

HbA1c

Clinical: SMD not calculable as no data presented for HbA1c.

Huss 2003

Asthma / Wee Willie Wheezie

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Knowledge, Clinical

Asthma Knowledge Test, Spirometry

Knowledge: data on Asthma Knowledge Test not reported (Air Control questionnaire data presented only). Clinical: reported in text as no difference between groups. No final data presented on spirometry; SMD not calculable.

Lehmann 2001

Diabetes / AIDA

Italy

RCT, 2 arms intervention versus control. Partial cross‐over design.

Knowledge

Knowledge Questionnaire

Knowledge: Knowledge Questionnaire data not presented.

Mahoney 2002

Alzheimer's disease / Memory Loss CD‐ROM

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Knowledge

Knowledge about memory loss

Knowledge: this study presented data on carers rather than patients. For this reason it was not included in the knowledge outcome meta‐analysis. An SMD however has been calculated and is presented in Additional Table 3.

Ritterband 2003

Encopresis / U Can Poop Too

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Knowledge, Behavioural

Encopresis Knowledge Questionnaire, VECAT

Knowledge and Behavioural: not possible to calculate SMDs from data presented.

Smith 2000

Diabetes / WTW

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Social Support, Emotional, Clinical

Personal Resource Questionnaire, Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness (PAIS), HbA1c

Social Support: only mean scores and no SDs were presented; SMD not calculable. Emotional: data not presented.Clinical: no data presented for HbA1c.

Wydra 2001

Cancer / Coping with Cancer

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Behavioural

Self‐care activities

Behavioural: SMD not calculable as no SD provided.

Wylie‐Rosett 2001

Obesity / CDROM

USA

RCT, 3 arms: workbook only versus workbook + computer programme vs workbook + computer programme + staff counselling. For purposes of systematic review, intervention = computer programme + workbook; control = workbook only.

Behavioural, Clinical

Reduction in dietary intake, reduction in BMI

Behavioral and Clinical: only change from baseline data provided. No final SD presented so SMD not calculable.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Included Studies ‐ outcome data not utilised in meta ‐analyses
Table 3. Knowledge

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

SMDs & Lipsey Cat.

Andrewes 1996

Eating Disorders Knowledge Questionnaire (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 27, Intervention = 27, Total = 54

1 week

0.76 (Large) Intervention

Bartholomew 2000

Knowledge Score (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 62, Intervention = 70, Total = 132

7.9 months (mean)

0.11 (Small) Intervention

Brown 1997

Knowledge Score (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 28, Intervention = 31, Total = 59

6 months

0.07 (Small) Intervention

Krishna 2003

Paed. Asthma Knowledge Care Survey (Children aged 7 to 17) (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 28, Intervention = 25, Total = 53

12 months

0.96 (Large) Intervention

Mahoney 2002

Knowledge Score Test (outcome improves as scale increases). Not used in meta‐analysis as study on carers.

Control = 57, Intervention = 56, Total 113

Immediately post‐test

1.41 (Large) Intervention

Shegog 2001

Knowledge Questionnaire (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 33, Intervention = 38, Total = 71

3 weeks

0.56 (Large) Intervention

Turnin 1992

Dietetic Knowledge (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 50, Intervention = 45, Total = 95

6 months

0.72 (Large) Intervention

Turnin 2001

Dietetic Knowledge Test (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 105, Intervention = 94, Total =199

12 months

0.31 (Small) Intervention

Binary Outcomes

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

Odds Ratio*

Horan 1990

Applied Diabetes Knowledge Score (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 9, Intervention = 9, Total = 18

18 Weeks

1.60

*Odds ratio. <1 = in favour of the control, >1 = in favour of the intervention

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Knowledge
Table 4. Social Support

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

SMDs & Lipsey Cat.

Brennan 1995

Reduced social isolation (outcome improves as scale decreases). Not used in meta‐analysis as study on carers.

Control = 49, Intervention = 47, Total = 96

12 months

‐0.14 (Small) Control

Brennan 1998

Reduced social isolation (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 23, Intervention = 25, Total = 48

6 months

0. 12 ( Small) Intervention

Brown 1997

Social support (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 28, Intervention = 31, Total = 59

6 months

0.18 (Small) Intervention

Glasgow 2003

Diabetes support scale (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 66, Intervention = 66, Total = 132

10 months

0.45 (Medium) Intervention

Gustafson 1999

Social support (outcome improves as scale increases)

Contol = 24, Intervention = 27, Total = 51*

5 months

0.51(Medium) Intervention

Gustafson 2001

Social support (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 125, Intervention = 121, Total = 246*

5 months

0.35 (Medium) Intervention

* Data provided by authors

Figuras y tablas -
Table 4. Social Support
Table 5. Self‐efficacy

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

SMDs & Lipsey Cat.

Bartholomew 2000

Child Self‐efficacy expectations (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 69, Intervention = 70, Total = 139

7.9 months (mean)

0.14 (Small) Intervention

Brown 1997

Perceived self‐efficacy (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 28, Intervention = 31, Total = 59

6 months

0.20 (Small) Intervention

Shegog 2001

Child self‐efficacy for asthma self‐management (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 32, Intervention = 38, Total = 70

3 weeks

0.48 (Medium) Intervention

Figuras y tablas -
Table 5. Self‐efficacy
Table 6. Behavioural Outcomes

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

SMDs & Lipsey Cat.

Bartholomew 2000

Child self‐ management (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 63, Intervention = 69, Total = 132

7.9 months (mean)

0.32 (Small) Intervention

Brown 1997

Diabetes self‐care rating scale (outcome improves as the scale increases)

Control = 28, Intervention = 31, Total = 59

6 months

0.43 (Medium) Intervention

Glasgow 2003

Average mins. of activity per day (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 66, Intervention = 66, Total = 132

10 months

‐0.09 (Small) Control

Gustafson 1999

Participation in health care (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 23, Intervention = 24, Total = 47

5 months

0.77 (Large) Intervention

Gustafson 2001

Behaviourial involvement in health care (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 125, Intervention = 119, Total = 244*

5 months

0.11 (Small) Intervention

Turnin 1992

Reduction in % fat of calorific intake (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 46, Intervention = 43, Total = 89

6 months

0.44 (Medium) Intervention

Turnin 2001

Reduction in caloric intake (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 97, Intervention = 89, Total = 186

12 months

‐0.06 (Small) Control

* Data provided by authors

Binary Outcomes

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

Odds Ratios**

Guendelman 2002

% of pts taking asthma medication without reminder. Binary outcome analysed separately.

Control = 52, Intervention = 58, Total = 110

12 weeks

2.88

Homer 2000

% of pts with peak flow metre available. Binary outcome analysed separately.

Control = 49, Intervention = 57, Total = 106

> 9 months

0.91

Horan 1990

% of pts who changed exercise behaviour. Binary outcome analysed separately.

Control = 10, Intervention = 10, Total = 20

18 weeks

2.33

** Odds ratio. <1 = in favour of the control, >1 = in favour of the intervention.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 6. Behavioural Outcomes
Table 7. Clinical Outcomes

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

SMDs & Lipsey Cat.

Bartholomew 2000

Functional status (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 55, Intervention = 58 , Total = 113

7.9 months (mean)

0.21 (Small) Intervention

Brennan 1998

Health status (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 23, Intervention = 25, Total = 48

6 months

‐0.42 (Medium) Control

Brown 1997

Reduction in HbA1c (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 28, Intervention = 31 , Total = 59

6 months

‐0.23(Small) Control

Glasgow 2003

Reduction in HbA1c (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 66, Intervention = 66, Total = 132

10 months

0.24 (Small) Intervention

Gustafson 1999

Physical function (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 24, Intervention = 26, Total = 50

5 months

0.07 (Small) Intervention

Krishna 2003

Decrease in days with asthma symptoms (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 44, Intervention = 42 , Total = 86

12 months

0.40 (Medium) Intervention

Lehmann 2003

Reduction in HbA1c (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 8 , Intervention = 10, Total = 18

6 weeks

0.77 (Large) Intervention

Ritterband 2003

Decrease in bowel accidents per week ( outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 12, Intervention = 12 , Total = 24

3 weeks

0.77 (Large) Intervention

Turnin 1992

Reduction in HbA1c (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 50, Intervention = 45, Total = 95

6 months

0.42 (Medium) Intervention

Turnin 2001

Decrease in BMI (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 120, Intervention = 110, Total = 230

12 months

0.10 (Small) Intervention

Binary Outcomes

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

Odds Ratio*

Guendelman 2002

Reduction in limitations in activity. Not included in this meta‐analysis and not presented in separate meta‐analysis as single binary result.

Control = 60, Intervention = 62, Total = 122

12 weeks

1.84

* Odds ratio. <1 = in favour of the control, >1 = in favour of the intervention

Figuras y tablas -
Table 7. Clinical Outcomes
Table 8. Emotional Outcomes

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

SMD & Lipsey Cat.

Brennan 1995 (study on carers)

Depression CES‐D

Control = 49, Intervention = 47, Total = 96

12 months

‐0.30 (Small) Control

Glasgow 2003

Depression CES‐D

Control = 66, Intervention = 66 , Total = 132

10 months

0.16 (Small) Intervention

Gustafson 1999

Depression MOS

Control = 24, Intervention = 27, Total = 51

5 months

0.24 (Small) Invtervention

Gustafson 2001

Emotional Well ‐Being Fact ‐B

Control = 125, Intervention = 121, Total = 246

5 months

0.06* (Small) Intervention

* using pooled SDs

Figuras y tablas -
Table 8. Emotional Outcomes
Comparison 1. IHCA versus Control. Knowledge

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Knowledge [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values] Show forest plot

7

663

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.22, 0.69]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. IHCA versus Control. Knowledge
Comparison 2. IHCA versus Control. Social Support

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Social support [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values] Show forest plot

5

536

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.18, 0.52]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. IHCA versus Control. Social Support
Comparison 3. IHCA versus Control. Self ‐efficacy

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Self‐efficacy [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values] Show forest plot

3

268

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.00, 0.48]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. IHCA versus Control. Self ‐efficacy
Comparison 4. IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Behavioural outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values] Show forest plot

7

889

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.01, 0.40]

2 Behavioural outcomes [Final Odds Ratios] Show forest plot

3

236

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.66 [0.71, 3.87]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes
Comparison 5. IHCA versus Control. Clinical outcomes

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values] Show forest plot

10

855

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.01, 0.35]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. IHCA versus Control. Clinical outcomes