Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Aplicaciones interactivas de comunicación sanitaria para pacientes con enfermedades crónicas

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

Andrewes 1996 {published data only}

Andrewes DG, O'Connor P, Mulder C, McLennan J, Derham H, Weigall S, et al. Computerised psychoeducation for patients with eating disorders. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1996;30(4):492‐7.

Bartholomew 2000 {published data only}

Bartholomew LK, Gold RS, Parcel GS, Czyzewski DI, Sockrider MM, Fernandez M, et al. Watch, Discover, Think, and Act: evaluation of computer‐assisted instruction to improve asthma self‐management in inner‐city children. Patient Education and Counseling 2000;39(2‐3):269‐80.
Bartholomew LK, Shegog R, Parcel GS, Gold RS, Fernandez M, Czyzewski DI, et al. Watch, Discover, Think, and Act: a model for patient education program development. Patient Education and Counseling 2000;39(2‐3):253‐68.

Brennan 1995 {published data only}

Bass DM, McClendon MJ, Brennan PF, McCarthy C. The buffering effect of a computer support network on caregiver strain. Journal of Aging and Health 1998;10(1):20‐43.
Brennan PF. Characterizing the use of health care services delivered via computer networks. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1995;2(3):160‐8.
Brennan PF. Computer networks promote caregiving collaboration: the ComputerLink Project. Proceedings ‐ the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1992:156‐60.
Brennan PF. ComputerLink: a computerized nursing care delivery system. Western Journal of Nursing Research 1992;14(2):239‐40.
Brennan PF. Differential use of computer network services. Proceedings ‐ the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1993:27‐31.
Brennan PF. Health informatics and community health: support for patients as collaborators in care. Methods of Information in Medicine 1999;38(4‐5):274‐8.
Brennan PF. The ComputerLink projects: a decade of experience. Nursing Informatics 1997;46:521‐6.
Brennan PF, Fink S. Health promotion, social support and computer networks. In: Street Jr RL, Gold WR, Manning T editor(s). Health Promotion and Interactive Technology: theoretical applications and future directions. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997:157‐69. [MEDLINE: 5792]
Brennan PF, Moore SM. Networks for home care support: the ComputerLink project. Caring Magazine 1994;13(8):64‐6.
Brennan PF, Moore SM, Smyth KA. Alzheimer's disease caregivers' uses of a computer network. Western Journal of Nursing Research 1992;14(5):662‐73.
Brennan PF, Moore SM, Smyth KA. ComputerLink: electronic support for the home caregiver. Advances in Nursing Science 1991;13(4):14‐27.
Brennan PF, Moore SM, Smyth KA. The effects of a special computer network on caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease. Nursing Research 1995;44(3):166‐72.
Brennan PF, Smyth K. Elders' attitudes and behavior regarding ComputerLink. Proceedings, Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1994:1011.
Casper GR, Calvitti A, Brennan PF, Overholt JL. ComputerLink: the impact of a computer network on Alzheimer's caregivers' decision‐making confidence and skill. Medinfo 1995;8(2):1546.
Gallienne RL, Moore SM, Brennan PF. Alzheimer's caregivers: psychosocial support via computer networks. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 1993;19(12):15‐22.
McClendon MJ, Bass DM, Brennan PF, McCarthy C. A computer network for Alzheimer's caregivers and use of support group services. Journal of Mental Health and Aging 1998;4(4):403‐20.
Payton FC, Brennan PF, Silvers JB. Cost justification of a community health information network: the ComputerLink for AD caregivers. Proceedings ‐ the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care 1995:566‐70.

Brennan 1998 {published data only}

Brennan PF. Computer network home care demonstration: a randomized trial in persons living with AIDS. Computers in Biology and Medicine 1998;28(5):489‐508.
Brennan PF. Differential use of computer network services. Proceedings ‐ the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1993:27‐31.
Brennan PF. Health informatics and community health: support for patients as collaborators in care. Methods of Information in Medicine 1999;38(4‐5):274‐8.
Brennan PF. The ComputerLink projects: a decade of experience. Nursing Informatics 1997;46:521‐6.
Brennan PF, Fink S. Health promotion, social support and computer networks. In: Street Jr RL, Gold WR, Manning T editor(s). Health Promotion and Interactive Technology: theoretical applications and future directions. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997:157‐69. [MEDLINE: 5792]
Brennan PF, Ripich S. Use of a home‐care computer network by persons with AIDS. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 1994;10(2):258‐72.
Brennan PF, Ripich S, Moore SM. The use of home‐based computers to support persons living with AIDS/ARC. Journal of Community Health Nursing 1991;8:3‐14.

Brown 1997 {published data only}

Brown SJ, Lieberman DA, Gemeny BA, Fan YC, Wilson DM, Pasta DJ. Educational video game for juvenile diabetes: results of a controlled trial. Medical Informatics 1997;22(1):77‐89.
Fan YC, Lieberman D, Gemeny B, Brown S, Wilson DM. Effects of an interactive video game on diabetes education ‐ a preliminary report.. Diabetes 1996;45:44a.
Lieberman D. Management of chronic pediatric diseases with interactive health games: theory and research findings. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 2001;24:26‐38.
Lieberman D, Brown S. Designing interactive video games for children's health education. Interactive technology and the new paradigm for healthcare. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1995:201‐10.
Lieberman DA. Interactive video games for health promotion: effects on knowledge, self‐efficacy, social support, and health. In: Street Jr RL, Gold WR, Manning T editor(s). Health Promotion and Interactive Technology: theoretical applications and future directions. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997:103‐20. [MEDLINE: 599]

Dragone 2002 {published data only}

Dragone MA, Bush PJ, Jones JK, Bearison DJ, Kamani S. Development and evaluation of an interactive CD‐ROM for children with leukemia and their families. Patient Education and Counseling 2002;46(4):297‐307.

Glasgow 2003 {published data only}

Barrera M, Jr, Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Boles SM, Feil EG. Do Internet‐based support interventions change perceptions of social support?: an experimental trial of approaches for supporting diabetes self‐management. American Journal of Community Psychology 2002;30(5):637‐54.
Glasgow RE, Barrera M, Jr, McKay HG, Boles SM. Social support, self‐management, and quality of life among participants in an internet‐based diabetes support program: a multi‐dimensional investigation. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 1999;2(4):271‐81.
Glasgow RE, Boles SM, McKay HG, Feil EG, Barrera JM. The D‐Net diabetes self‐management program: long‐term implementation, outcomes, and generalization results. Preventive Medicine 2003;36(4):410‐19.
McKay HG, Feil EG, Glasgow RE, Brown JE. Feasibility and use of an Internet support service for diabetes self‐management. Diabetes Educator 1998;24(2):174‐9.
McKay HG, Glasgow RE, Feil EG, Boles SM, Barrera JM. Internet‐based diabetes self‐management and support: initial outcomes from the diabetes network project. Rehabilitation Psychology 2002;47(1):31‐48.

Gorman 1995 {published data only}

Gorman R. Expert system for management of urinary incontinence in women. Proceedings ‐ the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1995:527‐31.

Guendelman 2002 {published data only}

Guendelman S, Meade K, Benson M, Chen YQ, Samuels S. Improving asthma outcomes and self‐management behaviors of inner‐city children: a randomized trial of the Health Buddy interactive device and an asthma diary. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 2002;156(2):114‐20.

Gustafson 1999 {published and unpublished data}

Boberg EW, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Chan CL. Development, acceptance, and use patterns of a computer‐based education and social support system for people living with AIDS/HIV infection. Computers in Human Behavior 1995;11(2):289‐311.
Chan, C‐L. Self‐efficacy, social support and emotional well‐being: using a health support system CHESS to cope with AIDS. Dissertation Abstracts International 2003;56‐11B(AAI9536800).
Gustafson DH, Bosworth K, Hawkins RP, Boberg EW, Bricker E. CHESS: a computer‐based system for providing information, referrals, decision support and social support to people facing medical and other health‐related crises. Proceedings ‐ the Annual.Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1992:161‐5.
Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Boberg E, Pingree S, Serlin RE, Graziano F, Chein LC. Impact of a patient‐centered, computer‐based health information/support system. American Journal of Preventive Medicine1999; Vol. 16, issue 1:1‐9.
Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Boberg EW, Bricker E, Pingree S, Chan CL. The use and impact of a computer‐based support system for people living with AIDS and HIV infection. Proceedings ‐ the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1994:604‐8.
Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Boberg EW, McTavish F, Owens B, Wise M, et al. CHESS: 10 years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underserved. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2002;65(3):169‐77.
Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Boberg EW, McTavish F, Owens B, Wise M, et al. CHESS: ten years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underserved. Medinfo 2001;10(2):1459‐63.
Gustafson DH, McTavish FM, Boberg E, Owens BH, Sherbeck C, Wise M, et al. Empowering patients using computer based health support systems [comment]. Quality in Health Care 1999;8(1):49‐56.
Hawkins RP, Pingree S, Gustafson DH, Boberg EW. Aiding those facing health crises: the experience of the CHESS project. In: Street Jr RL, Gold WR, Manning T editor(s). Health Promotion and Interactive Technology: theoretical applications and future directions. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997:79‐102. [MEDLINE: 396]
Pingree S, Hawkins RP, Gustafson DH, Boberg EW, Bricker E, Wise M, et al. Will HIV‐positive people use an interactive computer system for information and support? A study of CHESS in two communities. Proceedings ‐ the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1993:22‐6.
Rolnick SJ, Owens B, Botta R, Sathe L, Hawkins R, Cooper L, et al. Computerized information and support for patients with breast cancer or HIV infection. Nursing Outlook 1999;47(2):78‐83.
Smaglik P, Hawkins RP, Pingree S, Gustafson DH, Boberg E, Bricker E. The quality of interactive computer use among HIV‐infected individuals. Journal of Health Communication 1998;3(1):53‐68.

Gustafson 2001 {published and unpublished data}

Bucher JA, Houts PS. Problem‐solving through electronic bulletin boards. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 1999;16(3‐4):85‐91.
Gustafson D, Wise M, McTavish F, Taylor JO. Development and pilot evaluation of a computer‐based support system for women with breast cancer. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 1993;11(4):69‐93.
Gustafson DH, Bosworth K, Hawkins RP, Boberg EW, Bricker E. CHESS: a computer‐based system for providing information, referrals, decision support and social support to people facing medical and other health‐related crises. Proceedings ‐ the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1992:161‐5.
Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Pingree S, McTavish F, Arora NK, Mendenhall J, et al. Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. Journal of General Internal Medicine2001; Vol. 16, issue 7:435‐45.
Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Boberg EW, McTavish F, Owens B, Wise M, et al. CHESS: 10 years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underserved. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2002;65(3):169‐77.
Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Boberg EW, McTavish F, Owens B, Wise M, et al. CHESS: ten years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underserved. Medinfo 2001;10(2):1459‐63.
Gustafson DH, McTavish F, Hawkins R, Pingree S, Arora N, Mendenhall J, et al. Computer support for elderly women with breast cancer [comment]. JAMA 1998;280(15):1305.
Gustafson DH, McTavish FM, Boberg E, Owens BH, Sherbeck C, Wise M, et al. Empowering patients using computer based health support systems [comment]. Quality in Health Care 1999;8(1):49‐56.
Hawkins RP, Pingree S, Gustafson DH, Boberg EW. Aiding those facing health crises: the experience of the CHESS project. In: Street Jr RL, Gold WR, Manning T editor(s). Health Promotion and Interactive Technology: theoretical applications and future directions. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990:79‐102. [MEDLINE: 396]
McTavish FM, Gustafson DH, Owens BH, Hawkins RP, Pingree S, Wise M, et al. CHESS (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System): an interactive computer system for women with breast cancer piloted with an underserved population. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 1995;18(3):35‐41.
McTavish FM, Gustafson DH, Owens BH, Wise M, Taylor JO, Apantaku FM, et al. CHESS: an interactive computer system for women with breast cancer piloted with an under‐served population. Proceedings ‐ the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1994:599‐603.
McTavish FM, Pingree S, Hawkins R, Gustafson D. Cultural differences in use of an electronic discussion group. Journal of Health Psychology 2003;8(1):105‐17.
Owens BH, Robbins KC. CHESS: comprehensive health enhancement support system for women with breast cancer. Plastic Surgical Nursing 1996;16(3):172‐5.
Rolnick SJ, Owens B, Botta R, Sathe L, Hawkins R, Cooper L, et al. Computerized information and support for patients with breast cancer or HIV infection. Nursing Outlook 1999;47(2):78‐83.
Shaw BR, McTavish F, Hawkins R, Gustafson DH, Pingree S. Experiences of women with breast cancer: exchanging social support over the CHESS computer network. Journal of Health Communication 2000;5(2):135‐59.
Taylor JO, Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Pingree S, McTavish F, Wise M, et al. The comprehensive health enhancement support system. Quality Management in Health Care 1994;2(4):36‐43.

Homer 2000 {published data only}

Homer C, Susskind O, Alpert HR, Owusu M, Schneider L, Rappaport LA, et al. An evaluation of an innovative multimedia educational software program for asthma management: report of a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2000;106(1: Pt:2):210‐5.

Horan 1990 {published data only}

Horan PP, Yarborough MC, Besigel G, Carlson DR. Computer‐assisted self‐control of diabetes by adolescents. Diabetes Educator 1990;16(3):205‐11.

Huss 2003 {published data only}

Huss K, Winkelstein M, Nanda J, Naumann PL, Sloand ED, Huss RW. Computer game for inner‐city children does not improve asthma outcomes. Journal of Pediatric Health Care 2003;17(2):72‐8.

Krishna 2003 {published data only}

Krishna S, Francisco BD, Andrew BE, Konig P, Graff GR, Madsen RW. Internet‐enabled interactive multimedia asthma education program: A randomized trial. Pediatrics 2003;111(3):503‐10.

Lehmann 2003 {published data only}

Deutsch T, Lehmann ED, Carson ER, Roudsari AV, Hopkins KD, Sonksen PH. Time‐series analysis and control of blood‐glucose levels in diabetic patients. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 1994;41(3‐4):167‐82.
Lehmann ED. AIDA ‐ A computer‐based interactive educational diabetes simulator. Diabetes Educator 1998;24(3):341.
Lehmann ED. AIDA v4.3a diabetes simulator program ‐ Aida Evaluation 6‐10. www.2aida.org2003.
Lehmann ED. Interactive educational diabetes simulators: future possibilities. Diabetes Nutrition & Metabolism 1999;12(6):380‐7.
Lehmann ED. Interactive educational simulators in diabetes care. Medical Informatics 1997;22(1):47‐76.
Lehmann ED. Preliminary experience with the Internet release of AIDA ‐ an interactive educational diabetes simulator. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 1998;56(2):109‐32.
Lehmann ED. Spontaneous comments from users of the AIDA interactive educational diabetes simulator. Diabetes Educator 2000;26(4):633.
Lehmann ED. Usage of a diabetes simulation system for education via the internet. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003;69(1):63‐9.
Lehmann ED, Deutsch T. An interactive, educational model for insulin dosage and dietary adjustment in type I diabetes mellitus. Proceedings ‐ the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1992:205‐9.
Lehmann ED, Deutsch T. Computer assisted diabetes care: a 6‐year retrospective. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 1996;50(3):209‐30.
Lehmann ED, Deutsch T, Carson ER, Sonksen PH. AIDA: an interactive diabetes advisor. Computer Methods & Programs in Biomedicine 1994;41(3‐4):183‐203.
Lehmann ED, Hermanyi I, Deutsch T. Retrospective validation of a physiological model of glucose‐insulin interaction in type‐1 diabetes‐mellitus. Medical Engineering & Physics 1994;16(3):193‐202.
Tatti P, Lehmann ED. A prospective randomised‐controlled pilot study for evaluating the teaching utility of interactive educational diabetes simulators. Diabetes Nutrition & Metabolism 2003;16(1):7‐23.
Tatti P, Lehmann ED. A randomised‐controlled clinical trial methodology for evaluating the teaching utility of interactive educational diabetes simulators. Diabetes, Nutrition & Metabolism ‐ Clinical & Experimental 2001;14(1):1‐17.

Mahoney 2002 {published data only}

Mahoney DF, Tarlow BJ, Jones RN, Sandaire J. Effects of a multimedia project on users' knowledge about normal forgetting and serious memory loss. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2002;9(4):383‐94.

Ritterband 2003 {published data only}

Ritterband LM, Cox DJ, Walker LS, Kovatchev B, McKnight L, Patel K, et al. An Internet intervention as adjunctive therapy for pediatric encopresis. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 2003;71(5):910‐7.

Shegog 2001 {published data only}

Shegog R, Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Sockrider MM, Masse L, Abramson SL. Impact of a computer assisted education program on factors related to asthma self‐management behavior. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2001;8(1):49‐61.

Smith 2000 {published data only}

Cudney SA, Weinert C. Computer‐based support groups. Nursing in cyberspace. Computers in Nursing 2000;18(1):35‐43.
Smith L, Weinert C. Telecommunication support for rural women with diabetes. Diabetes Educator 2000;26(4):645‐55.
Sullivan T, Weinert C, Cudney S. Management of chronic illness: voices of rural women. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2003;44(6):566‐74.

Turnin 1992 {published data only}

Turnin MC, Beddok RH, Clottes JP, Martini PF, Abadie RG, Buisson JC, et al. Telematic expert system Diabeto: new tool for diet self‐monitoring for diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1992;15(2):204‐12.

Turnin 2001 {published data only}

Turnin MC, Bourgeois O, Cathelineau G, Leguerrier AM, Halimi S, Sandre‐Banon D, et al. Multicenter randomized evaluation of a nutritional education software in obese patients. Diabetes & Metabolism 2001;27(2:Pt:1):139‐47.

Wydra 2001 {published data only}

Wydra EW. The effectiveness of a self‐care management interactive multimedia module. Oncology Nursing Forum 2001;28(9):1399‐407.

Wylie‐Rosett 2001 {published data only}

Kalten MR, Ardito DA, Cimino C, Wylie‐Rosett J. A Web‐accessible core weight management program. Diabetes Educator 2000;26(6):929‐36.
Wylie‐Rosett J. Computerized weight loss intervention optimizes staff time: the clinical and cost results of a controlled clinical trial conducted in a managed care setting. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2001;101(10):1155‐62.

Glasgow 1997 {published data only}

Glasgow RE, La Chance P‐A, Toobert DJ, Brown J, Hampson SE, Riddle MC. Long term effects and costs of brief behavioural dietary intervention for patients with diabetes delivered from the medical office. Patient Education and Counseling 1997;32(3):175‐84.
Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Noell JW. A brief office‐based intervention to facilitate diabetes dietary self‐management. Health Education Research 1995;10(4):467‐78.

Glasgow 2000 {published data only}

Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ. Brief, computer‐assisted diabetes dietary self‐management counseling: effects on behavior, physiologic outcomes, and quality of life. Medical Care 2000;38(11):1073.

Glasgow 2002 {published data only}

Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Strycker LA. Implementation, generalization and long‐term results of the 'choosing well' diabetes self‐management intervention. Patient Education and Counseling 2002;48(2):115‐22.

Hazzard 2002 {published data only}

Hazzard A, Celano M, Collins M, Markov Y. Effects of STARBRIGHT World on knowledge, social support, and coping in hospitalized children with sickle cell disease and asthma. Children's Health Care 2002;31(1):69‐86.

McKay 2001 {published data only}

McKay HG, King D, Eakin EG, Seeley JR, Glasgow RE. The diabetes network internet‐based physical activity intervention: a randomized pilot study. Diabetes Care 2001;24(8):1328‐34.

Shea 2002 {published data only}

Shea S, Starren J, Weinstock RS, Knudson PE, Teresi J, Holmes D, et al. Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) Project: rationale and design [comment]. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2002;9(1):49‐62.
Starren J, Hripcsak G, Sengupta S, Abbruscato CR, Knudson PE, Weinstock RS, et al. Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) project: technical implementation [comment]. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2002;9(1):25‐36. [MEDLINE: 11]

Tate 2001 {published data only}

Tate DF, Wing RR, Winett RA. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA 2001;285(9):1172‐7.

Tate 2003 {published data only}

Tate D, Jackvony E, Wing R. Internet counseling for weight loss: computer vs. human counselors. Obesity Research 2003;11:A22‐3.
Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. Effects of Internet behavioral counseling on weight loss in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. JAMA 2003;289(14):1833‐6.

Lieberman 1995 {published and unpublished data}

Lieberman DA. Management of chronic pediatric diseases with interactive health games: theory and research findings. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 2001;24(1):26‐38.
Liebermann D. Three studies of an asthma education video game. Report to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA1995.

Murphy‐Ende 1996 {published data only}

Murphy‐Ende K. The relationship of self‐directed learning, self‐efficacy and health value in young women with cancer using a computer health education program. Dissertation Abstracts International 1996;57(Oct):2482.

Glasgow {unpublished data only}

Glasgow RE, Nutting PA, King DK, Nelson CC, Cutter G, Gaglio B, et al. A practical randomised trial to improve diabetes care. Unpublished paper.

Jones {unpublished data only}

Jones J. E‐mail correspondence.

Lorig {published data only}

Lorig K. Net‐based study teaches self‐management care of chronic conditions. Medicine on the Net 2003;March:8.

McPherson {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

McPherson A, Forster D, Glazebrook C, Smyth A. A randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of "The asthma files". National Register of Research Trials2003.

Pierce {published data only}

Pierce L. E‐mail correspondence.

Alderson 2004

Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT, editors. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2.2 updated March 2004. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004. Chichester UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd..

Andersson 2002

Andersson NB, Hanson E, Lennart M. Views of family carers and older people of information technology. British Journal of Nursing 2002;11:827.

Armitage 2001

Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta‐analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology 2001;40 Part 4:471‐99. [MEDLINE: 3]

Black 1995

MacPherson G (ed). Black's Medical Dictionary. 3rd Edition. London: A & C Black, 1995.

Bodenheimer 2002

Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self‐management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA 2002;288(19):2469‐75.

Boisen 2003

Boisen E, Bygholm A, Cavan D, Hejlesen OK. Copability, coping, and learning as focal concepts in the evaluation of computerised diabetes disease management. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003;70(2‐3):353‐63.

Corbin 1988

Corbin J, Strauss A. Unending Work and Care: Managing Chronic Illness at Home. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass, 1988.

Coulter 1999

Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D. Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough?. BMJ 1999;318(7179):318‐22.

Davison 2002

Davison BJ, Degner LF. Feasibility of using a computer‐assisted intervention to enhance the way women with breast cancer communicate with their physicians. Cancer Nursing 2002;25(6):417‐24. [MEDLINE: 2959]

Deeks 2005

Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, editors. Analysing and presenting results. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5 [updated May 2005]; Section 8. The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2005. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2005.

DerSimonian 1986

DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta‐analysis of clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7(3):177‐88.

Dijkstra 1999

Dijkstra A, De Vries H. The development of computer‐generated tailored interventions. Patient Education and Counseling 1999;36(2):193‐203. [MEDLINE: 3]

DOH; EPTF 2001

Expert Patient Task Force. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. Department of Health, London2001.

Eng 1999

Eng TR, Gustafson DH, Henderson J, Jimison H, Patrick K. Introduction to evaluation of interactive health communication applications. Science panel on interactive communication and health. American Journal of Preventative Medicine 1999;16(1):10‐5.

Eysenbach 2002

Eysenbach G, Kohler C. Does the internet harm health? Database of adverse events related to the internet has been set up. BMJ 2002;324(7331):239. [MEDLINE: 1]

Eysenbach 2004

Eysenbach G, Powell J, Englesakis M, Rizo C, Stern A. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. BMJ 2004;328(7449):1166.

Eysenbach 2005

Eysenbach G, Kummervold PE. "Is Cybermedicine Killing You?"‐The story of a Cochrane disaster. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2005;7(2):e21.

Fletcher Flinn 1995

Fletcher Flinn CM, Gravatt B. The efficacy of computer assisted instruction (CAI). Journal of Educational Computing Research 1995;13(3):219‐41.

Glueckauf 2003

Glueckauf RL, Loomis JS. Alzheimer's Caregiver Support Online. Neurorehabilitation 2003;18:135‐46.

Haby 2001

Haby MM, Waters E, Robertson CF, Gibson PG, Ducharme FM. Interventions for educating children who have attended the emergency room for asthma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001290]

Hanson 1999

Hanson EJ, Tetley J, Clarke A. A multimedia intervention to support family caregivers. Gerontologist 1999;39(6):736‐41.

Hanson 2000

Hanson EJ, Tetley J, Shewan J. Supporting family carers using interactive multimedia. British Journal of Nursing 2000;9(11):713‐9.

Higgins 2003

Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557‐60.

Kaltenthaler 2002

Kaltenthaler E, Shackley P, Stevens K, Beverley C, Parry G, Chilcott J. A systematic review and economic evaluation of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for depression and anxiety. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England) 2002;6(22):89p. [MEDLINE: 3594]

Klemm 2003

Klemm P, Bunnell D, Cullen M, Soneji R, Gibbons P, Holecek A. Online cancer support groups: a review of the research literature. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2003;21(3):136‐42. [MEDLINE: 4]

Lapsley 2004

Lapsley P, Groves T. The patient's journey: travelling through life with a chronic illness. BMJ 2004;329:582‐3.

Lipsey 1993

Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. Confirmation from meta‐analysis. American Psychologist 1993;48(12):1181‐209. [MEDLINE: 3595]

Lorig 2003

Lorig KR, Holman H. Self‐management education: history, definition, outcomes and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2003;26(1):1‐7. [MEDLINE: 1]

McTavish 2003

McTavish FM, Pingree S, Hawkins R, Gustafson D. Cultural differences in use of an electronic discussion group. Journal of Health Psychology 2003;8(1):105‐17.

Nguyen 2004

Nguyen HQ, Carrieri‐Kohlman V, Rankin SH, Slaughter R, Stulbarg MS. Internet‐based patient education and support interventions: a review of evaluation studies and directions for future research. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2004;34(2):95‐112.

O'Connor 2003

O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, Llewellyn‐Thomas H, Rovner D, Holmes‐Rovner M, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431]

Patrick 1999

Patrick K. Prevention, public health, and interactive health communication. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 1999;16(1):47. [MEDLINE: 1359]

Payton 1995

Payton FC, Brennan PF, Silvers JB. Cost justification of a community health information network: the ComputerLink for AD caregivers. Proceedings ‐ the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care 1995:566‐70.

Pierce 2002

Pierce LL, Steiner V, Govoni AL. In‐home online support for caregivers of survivors of stroke: a feasibility study. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2002;20(4):157‐64.

Rolnick 1999

Rolnick SJ, Owens B, Botta R, Sathe L, Hawkins R, Cooper L, et al. Computerized information and support for patients with breast cancer or HIV infection. Nursing Outlook 1999;47(2):78‐83.

Scheerhorn 1997

Scheerhorn D. Creating illness related communities in cyber space. In: Street Jr RL, Gold WR, Manning T editor(s). Health Promotion and Interactive Technology: theoretical applications and future directions. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997:171‐86. [MEDLINE: 5791]

SciPICH 1998

Adler L, .Alemi F, Ansley D, Brennan PF, Coyce M, Gustafson D, et al. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health Summary Statement. http://odphp.osophs.dhhs.gov/CONFRNCE/partnr98/sciPICH.htm1998.

Shaw 2000

Shaw BR, McTavish F, Hawkins R, Gustafson DH, Pingree S. Experiences of women with breast cancer: exchanging social support over the CHESS computer network. Journal of Health Communication 2000;5(2):135‐59.

Smyth 1993

Smyth KA, Harris PB. Using telecomputing to provide information and support to caregivers of persons with dementia. Gerontologist 1993;33(1):123‐7.

Steiner 2002

Steiner V, Pierce LL. Building a web of support for caregivers of persons with stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2002;9(3):102‐11.

Stewart 2000

Stewart DE, Wong F, Cheung AM, Dancey J, Meana M, Cameron JI, et al. Information needs and decisional preferences among women with ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 2000;77(3):357‐61. [MEDLINE: 10]

Walker 1998

Walker M, Harris D. Principles of adult education. In: Peyton JWR editor(s). Teaching and Learning in Medical Practice. London: Manticore Europe Ltd, 1998:21‐40.

Wantland 2004

Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of Web‐based vs. non‐Web‐based interventions: a meta‐analysis of behavioral change outcomes. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2004;6(4):e40.

Murray 2004

Murray E, Burns J, See Tai S, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 4.

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Andrewes 1996

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

54 patients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (3rd ed., revised) (DSM‐III‐R) diagnosed eating disorders. 14 with anorexia, 9 with bulimia, 4 with both in each group. Mean age 22 years. Intervention group n = 27, control group n = 27.

Interventions

DIET = 11 psychoeducational modules about eating disorders. Control = non‐directional computer based counselling.

Outcomes

Eating Disorders Knowledge Questionnaire; Eating Disorders Attitude Questionnaire

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Bartholomew 2000

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

171 children with asthma and their primary caregivers, recruited from inner‐city asthma clinics. 112 males; mean age 10.9 years (range 7 to 17); 42% Hispanic, 53% African‐American. N given for completers only: intervention group n = 70, control group = 63.

Interventions

Interactive multimedia computer programme (Watch, Discover, Think and Act), provides intensive, tailored, self‐management. Text, graphics, animation, sound, video clips. Data input = child's personal asthma symptoms, environmental triggers, medications, PEFR. Control = no intervention.

Outcomes

Knowledge of asthma and asthma self‐management; self‐efficacy of child; symptoms and functional status; and hospitalisation/ER visits.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Brennan 1995

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

102 caregivers with primary responsibility for a person with Alzheimer's disease. 67% female; median age = 64 years; 72% white participants; average education = completed high school. Intervention group n = 51, control group n = 51.

Interventions

ComputerLink (information encyclopaedia, online discussion group and decision support). Control = no intervention.

Outcomes

Decision confidence; decision‐making skill; social isolation; depression; economic analysis

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Brennan 1998

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

57 people living with AIDS. 93% male; mean age = 33 years; 61% white participants; 34% working; mean years of education = 13.5. Intervention group n = 31, control group n = 26.

Interventions

ComputerLink (information encyclopaedia, discussion group and decision support). Control = printed brochures, monthly telephone call.

Outcomes

Decision confidence; decision making skill; social isolation; patient health status; depression

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Brown 1997

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

59 children with Diabetes Mellitus, aged 8 to 16 years, recruited from two paediatric endocrinology outpatient clinics. Intervention group n = 31, control group n = 28.

Interventions

Computer video game (Packy and Marlon). Two adolescent elephant friends at diabetes summer camp. Players must save camp from rats and mice. Help monitor blood glucose, take insulin, review diabetes logbook, find correct foods, self care, social situations. Control = entertainment video.

Outcomes

Enjoyment of game; self‐efficacy; social support; knowledge; diabetes self‐care; HbA1c; number of urgent care visits

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Dragone 2002

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

Children aged 4 to 11 with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or acute myeloid leukaemia in first remission. 41 children recruited, 31 completed study, (14 x 4 to 6 year olds; 17 x 7 to 11 year olds); 25 white, 3 Latino, 1 African American, 1 Asian, 1 'other' participants. All participants had acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Of the 31 children completing the study, intervention group n = 15, control n = 16.

Interventions

CD‐ROM covering treatment, helping yourself, tests, blood cells, anatomy and physiology, and miscellaneous items including sibling view of leukaemia, living with leukaemia. Control = standard educational book for children with leukaemia.

Outcomes

Health locus of control; knowledge; satisfaction; use of computer

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Glasgow 2003

Methods

RCT. 4 arms: control; coach; social support; social support + coach

Participants

320 adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. 47% male; mean age 59 years (SD 9.2 years); 83% had no or very limited internet experience; mean time since diagnosis 8 years. Control and intervention groups 'n' not stated. In the absence of any confirmation in the published literature of the numbers recruited to each group, review authors inferred that 80 participants were allocated to each arm of the trial.

Interventions

Information only (control) = computer access to articles providing information only about medical, nutritional and lifestyle aspects of Diabetes Mellitus. Personal coach = information + computer‐mediated access to professional coach trained in providing dietary advice to diabetics. This arm included personal database and online Q&A with a dietician. Social support = information + e‐mail forum (Diabetes Support Conference ‐ peer led but professionally mediated) and some e‐mail focus forums. Combined = all three interventions.

Outcomes

Physical activity; Diabetes Support Scale; dietary intake; depression; HbA1c: lipids

Notes

Comparison used for data extraction and synthesis = control (information only) vs information + social support

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Gorman 1995

Methods

RCT. 3 arms: UICS versus booklet vs control

Participants

60 ambulatory, alert, community dwelling women with urinary incontinence defined as accidental urine loss at least twice a week. Mean age = 55 years. Intervention (UICS) group n = 22, booklet group n= 18, control group n = 20.

Interventions

UICS = information about urinary incontinence, bladder training and pelvic muscle exercises. Booklet = AHCPR patient guideline with handout. Control = general health video.

Outcomes

Urinary incontinence episodes; impact of incontinence on life in activities of daily living

Notes

Comparison used for data extraction and synthesis = UICS vs control

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Guendelman 2002

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

134 children with asthma, recruited from primary care clinic; 57% male; aged 8 to 16 years; 76% African‐American; 93% public insurance. Intervention group n = 66, control group n = 68.

Interventions

Health Buddy = personal, interactive information and advice on self‐management. Control = asthma diary.

Outcomes

Limitation in activity; self‐reported asthma symptoms; PEFR 50 to 80% of personal best or < 50%; use of health services; self‐care behaviours

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Gustafson 1999

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

204 HIV‐positive patients; 90% male; 84% white participants; 65% experiencing HIV‐related symptoms; average education = some college. Intervention group n = 107, control group n = 97.

Interventions

CHESS = information, decision support, online 'Ask the Expert' and online discussion group. Control = no intervention.

Outcomes

Cognitive function; participation in health care; negative emotions; social support; physical function; use of health services

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Gustafson 2001

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

295 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, under age 60. Mean age 44.4 years; 74% white participants; 85% private insurance. Intervention group n = 147, control group n = 148.

Interventions

CHESS: information, social support (discussion groups, personal stories), decision support (health charts, decision aids, action plan). Control = book about breast cancer.

Outcomes

Information competence; participation in health care; emotional well‐being; social support

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Homer 2000

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

137 children aged 3 to 12, with physician‐diagnosed asthma; recruited from hospital (118) and community clinics (19).
30.7% female; mean age 7.4 years; 60.5% African‐American, 5.3% Hispanic. Intervention group n = 76, control group n = 61.

Interventions

Asthma Control = interactive educational computer program. Children help a superhero complete all six levels of game while keeping his asthma under control. Control = age‐appropriate asthma educational book + non‐educational computer game.

Outcomes

Total number of emergency department and acute office visits during study period; child's average asthma specific symptom severity; functional status;satisfaction; use of PEFR monitoring; number of common triggers and allergens in home environment; knowledge

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Horan 1990

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

20 adolescents aged 12 to 19 with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus for > 1 year. 30% male; 80% white participants. Recruited from paediatric endocrinologists in private practice and from customers at a store for people with diabetes. Intervention group n = 10, control group n = 10.

Interventions

DISC = contained 3 components: data management and review; factual and applied diabetes education; problem solving and goal setting. Control = printed materials.

Outcomes

HbA1c; blood glucose levels; frequency of self‐monitoring of blood glucose; knowledge; behaviour change

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Huss 2003

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention vs control

Participants

148 children, recruited from hospital discharge records and local paediatric allergy and asthma clinics. 44% male; mean age 9.6 years; 21% non‐Hispanic white, 78% non‐Hispanic black. Intervention group n = 78, control group n = 70.

Interventions

Wee Willie Wheezie = computer game where children negotiate Wee Willie through various home‐like environments and hazards. Control = conventional education (written) and non asthma‐related computer game.

Outcomes

Asthma knowledge; spirometry; paediatric asthma quality of life

Notes

Children only had 20 minutes with the intervention.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Krishna 2003

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

228 children (under 18 years) with asthma attending a paediatric pulmonary clinic. 65% male, 86% white participants. Intervention group n = 119, control group n = 109.

Interventions

IMPACT = internet‐enabled, interactive multimedia asthma education, principles of self‐management, behavioural objectives. Both intervention and control groups also received printed and verbal asthma education.

Outcomes

Asthma knowledge; asthma symptoms; resource utilisation

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Lehmann 2003

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

24 adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus; 50% male. Intervention group n = 12, control group n = 12.

Interventions

Intervention = 6 X 1 hour sessions with AIDA (education, self‐management, decision support). Control = 6 X 1 hour sessions of conventional education (slides), same topics.

Outcomes

Knowledge; self‐monitoring of blood glucose; forward thinking; well‐being and self‐confidence; hypoglycaemic attacks; HbA1c; empowerment

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Mahoney 2002

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

113 adults concerned about memory loss in a family member; intervention group n = 56, control group n = 57.

Interventions

CD‐ROM = information distinguishing normal forgetfulness from dementia; procedures for clinical diagnosis; resources available; family responses. Control = no intervention.

Outcomes

Knowledge about memory loss; user satisfaction; contacts with clinicians

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Ritterband 2003

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

24 encopretic children, 19 boys; mean age 8.46 years (SD 1.81 year). Intervention group n = 12, control group n = 12.

Interventions

U Can Poop Too = information about anatomy, physiology and treatment of encopresis; behavioural treatment based on enhanced toilet training. Control = phone calls only

Outcomes

Bowel habits; encopresis knowledge questionnaire (EKQ); VECAT (assesses bowel‐specific problems related to encopresis); number of bowel accidents per week

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Shegog 2001

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

76 children recruited from clinics and schools. 46 boys, 25 girl; mean age 10.7 years; 47.9% white non‐Hispanic participants, 40.8% African‐American participants, 11.3% Hispanic participants. N given for 71 children completing the study of which intervention group n = 38, control group n = 33.

Interventions

Interactive multimedia computer programme = (Watch, Discover, Think and Act) provides intensive, tailored, self‐management. Text, graphics, animation, sound, video clips. Data input = child's personal asthma symptoms, environmental triggers, medications, PEFR. Control = no intervention.

Outcomes

Knowledge of asthma; self‐management; self‐efficacy

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Smith 2000

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

30 women aged 35 to 60, with Diabetes Mellitus (Type 1 or 2), with a telephone and living at least 25 miles outside the 6 major cities of Montana. Intervention group n = 15, control group n = 15.

Interventions

Women to Women Diabetes Project = 4 components: Conversation (online support group); mailbox (private e‐mail correspondence between group members); HealthChat (formal diabetes education) and Resource Rack (bulletin board). Control = usual care.

Outcomes

HbA1c; health status; sources of support; personal resource questionnaire; quality of life index; social readjustment rating scale; psychosocial adaptation to illness scale

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Turnin 1992

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

105 patients with Diabetes Mellitus. 59% male; 72% Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus; mean age 45 years; 74% working. Intervention group n = 54, control group = 51.

Interventions

Diabeto = Minitel‐delivered dietary information and individualised counselling, energy requirements, meal analysis, menus, recipes, e‐mail. Both control and intervention groups had 5 days education at start; after 6 months control group received intervention.

Outcomes

Knowledge; eating habits; body weight; HbA1c

Notes

Data reported just before cross‐over point.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Turnin 2001

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention vs control

Participants

557 obese patients: BMI > or equal to 33.3 kg / m2. 92.3% female; mean age 41.2 years; salaried workers 36.5%, unemployed or retired 23.1% teaching or health care professions 14.1%. Of the 341 participants who completed the trial, intervention group n = 169, control group n = 172.

Interventions

Nutri‐Expert = Minitel delivered information about diet, individualised help in meal analysis and composition. Programme evaluates calorific requirements, records meals eaten during the day and provides suggestions for balance, recipes, discussion and Q&A fora. Control and intervention groups also received usual care, consisting of 7 nutritional visits with physicians and dieticians conjointly.

Outcomes

BMI; waist circumference; weight; knowledge; dietary intake; fasting insulin; lipids

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Wydra 2001

Methods

RCT. 2 arms: intervention versus control

Participants

174 patients with cancer; 51% male; age range = 21 to 82 years; 81% white participants. Intervention group n = 86, control group n = 88.

Interventions

Interactive Video Disc = 5 modules on: using the computer; fatigue; saving maintaining and restoring energy; managing stress; sleeping better; information and skill training. Control = normal care only.

Outcomes

Self care activities; wide range achievement test; self care ability

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Wylie‐Rosett 2001

Methods

RCT. 3 arms: workbook only vs workbook + computer programme vs workbook + computer programme + staff counselling

Participants

588 people with BMI >35.6 kg / m2; recruited from a managed care organisation. Workbook only (control) n = 116, workbook+ computer group (intervention) n = 236, workbook+computer+staff counselling n= 236. Assumptions from previous research were utilised by the study authors to calculate the sample sizes for each intervention arm.

Interventions

Intervention = computer programme containing nutrition, fitness and psychobehavioural content with information, guidance, interactive quizzes, video clips. Control = workbook containing 20 sections with self‐help sheets.

Outcomes

BMI; diabetes and cardiovascular risk; medication usage; dietary and exercise habits; costs

Notes

Comparison used for data extraction and synthesis = computer programme + workbook vs workbook only.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Glasgow 1997

2 arm RCT comparing IHCA + personal coach with usual care. Not possible to determine effects of IHCA without personal coach.

Glasgow 2000

2 x 2 randomised controlled trial investigating incremental effects of telephone follow‐up or community resources enhancement over and above IHCA. All patients received IHCA, so not possible to determine effects of IHCA alone.

Glasgow 2002

12 month follow‐up of 2 x 2 randomised controlled trial investigating incremental effects of telephone follow up or community resources enhancement over and above IHCA. All patients received IHCA so not possible to determine effects of IHCA alone.

Hazzard 2002

Randomisation based on date of admission to hospital; hence a high likelihood of bias.

McKay 2001

2 arm RCT comparing IHCA + personal coach with information only. Not possible to determine effects of IHCA without personal coach.

Shea 2002

2 arm RCT comparing IHCA + nurse case manager with usual care. Not possible to determine effects of IHCA without nurse case manager.

Tate 2001

2 arm RCT comparing IHCA only with IHCA and additional behaviour therapy. Not possible to determine effects of IHCA.

Tate 2003

2 arm RCT comparing IHCA with IHCA + online weekly access to therapist.

Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID]

Glasgow

Trial name or title

RCT of CD‐ROM assisted diabetes care enhancement programme

Methods

Participants

52 physicians and 886 people with type II diabetes

Interventions

CD‐ROM assisted diabetes care enhancement programme

Outcomes

Starting date

Contact information

[email protected]

Notes

Jones

Trial name or title

RCT of cancer CD‐ROM

Methods

Participants

Children with solid tumours

Interventions

Educational CD‐ROM

Outcomes

Communication, self‐empowerment

Starting date

Contact information

[email protected]

Notes

Lorig

Trial name or title

RCT of Self‐ Management @ Stanford

Methods

Participants

People diagnosed with heart disease, type II diabetes or lung disease

Interventions

Online workshops on disease management

Outcomes

Starting date

Contact information

http://healthyliving.stanford.edu

Notes

McPherson

Trial name or title

RCT of an Educational CD‐ROM for children with asthma

Methods

Participants

Children with asthma

Interventions

Educational CD‐ROM for children with asthma

Outcomes

Starting date

Contact information

[email protected]

Notes

Pierce

Trial name or title

RCT of Caring Web

Methods

Participants

120 caregivers of people with stroke

Interventions

Web‐based support system

Outcomes

Improved carer wellbeing, use of healthcare services

Starting date

Contact information

[email protected]

Notes

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. IHCA versus Control. Knowledge

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Knowledge [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values] Show forest plot

7

663

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.22, 0.69]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 IHCA versus Control. Knowledge, Outcome 1 Knowledge [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Comparison 1 IHCA versus Control. Knowledge, Outcome 1 Knowledge [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. IHCA versus Control. Social Support

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Social support [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values] Show forest plot

5

536

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.18, 0.52]

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 IHCA versus Control. Social Support, Outcome 1 Social support [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Comparison 2 IHCA versus Control. Social Support, Outcome 1 Social support [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. IHCA versus Control. Self ‐efficacy

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Self‐efficacy [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values] Show forest plot

3

268

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.00, 0.48]

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 IHCA versus Control. Self ‐efficacy, Outcome 1 Self‐efficacy [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Comparison 3 IHCA versus Control. Self ‐efficacy, Outcome 1 Self‐efficacy [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Open in table viewer
Comparison 4. IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Behavioural outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values] Show forest plot

7

889

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.01, 0.40]

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes, Outcome 1 Behavioural outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Comparison 4 IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes, Outcome 1 Behavioural outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

2 Behavioural outcomes [Final Odds Ratios] Show forest plot

3

236

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.66 [0.71, 3.87]

Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes, Outcome 2 Behavioural outcomes [Final Odds Ratios].

Comparison 4 IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes, Outcome 2 Behavioural outcomes [Final Odds Ratios].

Open in table viewer
Comparison 5. IHCA versus Control. Clinical outcomes

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values] Show forest plot

10

855

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.01, 0.35]

Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 IHCA versus Control. Clinical outcomes, Outcome 1 Clinical outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Comparison 5 IHCA versus Control. Clinical outcomes, Outcome 1 Clinical outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

original image
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Comparison 1 IHCA versus Control. Knowledge, Outcome 1 Knowledge [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 IHCA versus Control. Knowledge, Outcome 1 Knowledge [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Comparison 2 IHCA versus Control. Social Support, Outcome 1 Social support [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 IHCA versus Control. Social Support, Outcome 1 Social support [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Comparison 3 IHCA versus Control. Self ‐efficacy, Outcome 1 Self‐efficacy [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 IHCA versus Control. Self ‐efficacy, Outcome 1 Self‐efficacy [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Comparison 4 IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes, Outcome 1 Behavioural outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes, Outcome 1 Behavioural outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Comparison 4 IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes, Outcome 2 Behavioural outcomes [Final Odds Ratios].
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes, Outcome 2 Behavioural outcomes [Final Odds Ratios].

Comparison 5 IHCA versus Control. Clinical outcomes, Outcome 1 Clinical outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 IHCA versus Control. Clinical outcomes, Outcome 1 Clinical outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values].

Table 1. Further Details of Included Studies

Author

Cond/ IHCA

Country

Methods

PPT Characteristics

Follow Up Rate

Details of IHCA

Intervention Group

Control Group

Outcome Measures*

* Outcome measures in capitals were selected for data synthesis.

Andrewes 1996

Eating Disorder / DIET

Australia

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

54 patients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (3rd ed., rev.) (DSM‐III‐R) diagnosed eating disorders: 14 with anorexia, 9 with bulimia, 4 with both in each group. Mean age 22 years. Intervention group n = 27, control group n = 27.

54/54 = 100%

A computer based psychoeducation programme containing 11 information modules about eating disorders plus personal stories.

Completed the DIET programme twice in a healthcare setting with an interval of 7 days between the 1st and 2nd sessions.

Non‐directional computer based counselling programme

Eating Disorders Attitude Questionnaire, EATING DISORDERS KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE, evaluation of computer programme

Bartholomew 2000

Asthma / Watch Discover Think Act ( WDTA)

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

171 children with asthma and their primary caregivers, recruited from inner‐city asthma clinics. 112 males, 59 females; mean age 10.9 years (range 7 to 17 years); 42% Hispanic, 53% African‐American. Of the 133 children who completed the study the intervention group n = 70, control group n = 63.

133 / 171 = 78%. No information about distribution of dropouts.

An interactive multimedia computer game delivered via CD‐ROM, provides tailored information on asthma self‐management for children with asthma. The programme game functions incorporate decision support and behaviour change support. It utilises text, graphics, animation, sound, video clips. Data input = child's personal asthma symptoms, environmental triggers, medications, PEFR.

Played the game during scheduled visits to asthma or community pediatric clinics. Participation time in the study was from 4 to 15.6 months, mean = 7.6 months.

Received no intervention.

CHILD KNOWLEGE OF ASTHMA, CHILD SELF MANAGEMENT, CHILD SELF EFFICACY, symptoms, FUNCTIONAL STATUS and HOSPITALISATION/ ER VISITS

Brennan 1995

Alzhemier's disease / ComputerLink

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

102 caregivers with primary responsibility for a person with Alzheimer's disease. Intervention group n = 51, control group n = 51; 67% female; 72% white participants; median age = 64 years; education = completed high school.

96 / 102 = 94%. 4 dropouts in intervention group; 2 in comparison group.

A specialised computer network, ComputerLink. ComputerLink provides factual information in the form of an electronic encyclopaedia and peer and decision support via online discussion groups and self defined decision problem analysis.

Received in‐home access to ComputerLink via a provided computer link for 12 months.

Received a monthly telephone call.

Decision confidence, decision‐making skill, SOCIAL ISOLATION, DEPRESSION, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Brennan 1998

AIDS & HIV / ComputerLink

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

57 people living with AIDS. Mean age = 33 years; 93% male; 61% white participants; 34% working; mean years of education = 13.5. Intervention group n = 31, control group n = 26

48 / 57 = 84%. 6 dropouts from intervention group; 3 from control group.

A specialised computer network , ComputerLink ComputerLink provides information in the form of an electronic encyclopaedia. Peer support and decIsion support is provided via online discussion groups and a decision support system based on decision modelling.

Received in‐home access to ComputerLink via a provided computer terminal for 6 months.

Received printed brochures and a monthly telephone call to maintain contact with research staff.

Decision making skill, decision confidence, SOCIAL ISOLATION, DEPRESSION, PATIENT HEALTH STATUS

Brown 1997

Diabetes / Packy and Marlon

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

59 children with Diabetes Mellitus, aged 8 to 16, recruited from two paediatric endocrinology outpatient clinics. Intervention group n = 31, control group n = 28

Not stated specifically; results tables suggest 100% follow up.

Interactive computer programme in video game format. The game follows the adventures of two adolescent elephant friends at diabetes summer camp facing threats to their well‐being. Information about self‐care is provided in the form of multiple choice quizzes and behaviour change support is provided through role playing within the game ‐ the characters must engage in specific behaviours to stay healthy. The ability of two players to interact within the camp helps facilitate peer support.

Received in‐home access to a video game system and the video game Packy and Marlon to play on it for a period of 6 months.

Received in‐home access to a video game system and an entertainment video game to play on it for a period of 6 months.

Enjoyment of game scale, SELF EFFICACY MEASURE, SOCIAL SUPPORT, KNOWLEDGE SCORE, DIABETES SELF‐CARE RATING SCALE, HBA1C, NUMBER OF URGENT CARE VISITS

Dragone 2002

Cancer / Kidz with Leukemia

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

41 children aged 4 to 11 with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or acute myeloid leukaemia in first remission. 41 children recruited, 31 completed study, (14 x 4 to 6 year olds; 17 x 7 to 11 year olds); 25/31 white, 3/31 Latino; 1/31 African American; 1 / 31 Asian; 1/31 Other. Of the 31 children completing the study the intervention group n = 15, control group n= 16

31/41 = 76%

An interactive CD‐ROM, delivered via compute to educate children with leukaemia. Information is provided on areas such as treatment, tests, blood cells, anatomy physiology and expert explanations . Behaviour change support is provided with in the Help Yourself module. Miscellaneous topics include sibling view of leukaemia, living with leukaemia.

Received CD‐ROM to use for a 3 month period. Participants could access the CDROM only if they already had a computer at home or had access to one at school or elsewhere .

Received conventional leukaemia information in book format.

Health locus of control, LEUKAEMIA EVENT KNOWLEDGE INTERVIEW, satisfaction and use of computer questionnaires (children and parents)

Glasgow 2003

Diabetes / D‐NET 2003

USA

RCT, 4 arms (control; coach; social support; social support + coach)
For the purpose of systematic review the comparison used = control (information only) vs information + social support.

320 adults with Type II Diabetes Mellitus. 47% male; mean age 59 (SD 9.2 years); 83% had no or very limited Internet experience; mean time since diagnosis 8 years.

264/320 = 82%; 'n' in each arm of trial and follow up numbers by group is not presented. An overall follow up rate of 82% is reported by authors with no significant difference between groups reported. Assuming equal numbers were assigned to each group with an 82 % follow up rate = 80 x 82% = 66 completers per trial arm.

A computer system giving in home access via a providing Internet connection to electronic information on diabetes. Additional modules contain peer support and behaviour change support.

Received information + e‐mail forum (Diabetes Support Conference ‐ peer led but professionally mediated) and some e‐mail focus forums. Home access for 10 months.

Received computer access to electronic articles providing information only about medical, nutritional and lifestyle aspects of diabetes.

DIABETES SUPPORT SCALE, Kristal ffb scale, grams daily fat, AVERAGE MINUTES PER DAY OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, CENTRE FOR EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES ‐ DEPRESSION SCALE, lipid ratio, HBA1C, block nci fat screener

Gorman 1995

Urinary Incontinence / UICS

USA

RCT, 3 arms: UICS versus booklet (AHCPR patient guideline with handout) vs. control. For purposes of systematic review, UICS is compared with control.

60 ambulatory, alert community dwelling women with urinary incontinence defined as accidental urine loss at least twice a week. Mean age = 55, Intervention (UICS) group n = 22, booklet group n= 18, control group n = 20.

60 / 60 = 100%

Computer based expert interactive system containing information about urinary incontinence. Behavioural support provided through bladder training and pelvic muscle exercises.

Used the expert system at a single session arranged by research staff.

Watched a general health video.

EPISODES OF URINARY INCONTINENCE, Incontinence Impact on Life Questionnaire

Guendelman 2002

Asthma / Health Buddy

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

134 children with asthma, recruited from primary care clinic; aged 8 to 16 years, 57% male; 76% African‐American; 93% public insurance. Intervention group n = 66, control group n = 68.

128 / 134 = 96% at 6 weeks; 120/134 = 90% at 12 weeks. Dropouts equally distributed between groups.

A personal, interactive computer programme linked to a secure web site. The programme gives information on asthma via core questions, asthma facts and trivia functions. Behaviour change support is provided immediate feedback giving praise or encourage on answers to questions on asthma self management. query clinical outcome

Accessed the programme at home via a provided telecommunications device for a period of 90 days.

Used a standard asthma diary.

LIMITATION IN ACTIVITY, pefr:50‐80% or <50% of personal best, asthma symptoms, missed school days, functional status, URGENT CALLS TO HOSPITAL, VISITS TO ER, HOSPITALISATION, TAKES ASTHMA MEDICATION WITHOUT REMINDER, reminded to use Health Buddy

Gustafson 1999

AIDS & HIV / CHESS

USA

RCT, 2 arms: CHESS versus control

204 HIV‐positive patients; 90% male; 84% white participants; 65% experiencing HIV‐related symptoms; average education = some college. Intervention group n = 107, control n = 97.

183/204 = 90% (92% in control group; 88% in intervention).

A computer based health support system which provides breast cancer patients with information on their illness via functions such as question and answer facilities and the instant library. Decision support is provided via a decision aid service and peer support via online discussion groups. Behaviour support is delivered in the form of assessment and action plan facilities.

Received in‐home access to CHESS via a provided PC for either 6 (1st cohort) or 3 months (2nd and 3rd cohorts).

Received usual care only.

Cognitive function, negative emotions, DEPRESSION‐MOS SUBSCALE, PHYSICAL FUNCTION, active life, energy, SOCIAL SUPPORT, PARTICIPATION IN HEALTH CARE, USE OF AMBULATORY CARE SERVICES AND HOPITALISATION

Gustafson 2001

Cancer / CHESS

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

295 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, under age 60. Mean age 44.4 years; 74% white participants; 85% private insurance. Intervention group n = 147, control group n= 148.

246 / 295 = 83% (84% in control group; 82% in intervention group).

A computer based health support system which provides HIV‐positive patients with information on their illness via functions such as question and answer facilities and the instant library. Decision support is provided via a decision aid service and peer support via online discussion groups. Behaviour support is delivered in the form of health plan, assessment and action plan facilities.

Received in‐home access to CHESS via a provided PC for 6 months.

Received a copy of Dr Susan Love's Breast Book.

SOCIAL SUPPORT, information competence, unmet information needs, PARTICIPATION ‐ BEHAVIOURAL INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH CARE, participation level of confidence, confidence in doctors, EMOTIONAL WELLBEING ‐ FACT B, breast cancer concerns

Homer 2000

Asthma / Asthma Control

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

137 children aged 3 to 12, with physician‐diagnosed asthma, recruited from hospital (118) and community clinic (19).
Mean age 7.4 years; 30.7% female; 60.5% African‐American, 5.3% Hispanic. Intervention group n = 76, control group n = 61.

106 / 137 = 77% (80% of control group; 75% of intervention group).

An interactive educational computer programme in game format. Children help a superhero complete all 6 levels of game while keeping his asthma under control. General asthma information is provided by the programme as well as behaviour change and decision support facilities.

Used the programme over 3 sessions at either a primary care clinic or a neighbourhood health center. The average time to complete the game for a first time player was 45 to 60 minutes.

Received an asthma education book and played a non‐educational computer game.

CHILD KNOWLEDGE, TOTAL NUMBERS OF EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT AND ACUTE OFFICE VISITS DURING STUDY PERIOD, child's average ASTHMA SPECIFIC SYMPTOM SEVERITY, satisfaction, PEFR METER AVAILABLE, use of pefr meter, monitoring number of common triggers and allergens in home environment

Horan et al 1990

Diabetes / DISC

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

20 adolescents aged 12 to 19 with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus for > 1 year. 30% male; 80% white participants. Recruited from paediatric endocrinologists in private practice and from customers at a store for people with diabetes. Intervention group n = 10, control group n = 10.

20/20 = 100%

A microcomputer based system giving in‐home access via a provided computer terminal. DISC contains 3 components. Information is provided via factual and applied diabetes education; behaviour change support is provided via goal setting; and problem solving functions and facilities for reviewing self monitored data on blood glucose, exercise, diet, emotional stress etc.

Used the computer at home for a period of 15 weeks, spending 7 weeks on the diabetes education model and focusing on the goal‐setting and problem solving module for the last 8 weeks.

Received conventional diabetes education via an education booklet.

HBA1C, blood glucose levels, frequency of smbg, APPLIED DIABETES KNOWLEDGE SCORE, BEHAVIOUR CHANGE ‐ EXERCISE, diet, insulin, emotional stress, physical stress, weight, hormones, alcohol and drugs

Huss 2003

Asthma / Wee Willie Wheezie

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

148 children, recruited from hospital discharge records and local pediatric allergy and asthma clinics. Mean age 9.6 y; 44% male; 21% non‐Hispanic White; 78% non‐Hispanic Black. Intervention group n = 78, control group n = 70.

101 / 148 = 68%. Intervention group = 56/78 = 72%; control group = 45/70 = 64%.

An interactive computer programme in game format where children negotiate Wee Willie through various home‐like environments and hazards. Information is provided via quizzes. Behaviour change support is provided in the form of Wee Willie 'healthline' which responds to environmental triggers or missed medication. An onscreen nurse provides guidance on incorrect answers.

Received conventional education (written asthma materials and a non‐asthma‐related computer programme) and the computer based instructional asthma game ‐ Wee Willie Wheezie. Children played the asthma game for 20 minutes during a scheduled home visit.

Received conventional education: written asthma materials and a non‐asthma‐related computer programme.

SPIROMETRY used to measure pulmonary function, asthma severity measured using NAEPP criteria, Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life, ASTHMA KNOWLEDGE TEST, Air control questionnaire

Krishna 2003

Asthma / Impact

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

246 children (under 18 years) with asthma attending a pediatric pulmonary clinic. 65% male; 86% white participants. Intervention group n = 119, control group n = 127. Only children in the age group 7 to 17 years used the programme independently of carers.

228/246 = 93% (intervention group = 107/119 = 90%; control group = 121/127 = 95%).

An internet‐enabled, interactive multimedia asthma education programme incorporating information and self management skills. Provides behavior change and decision support in its graphic templates containing interactive vignettes.

Received conventional asthma education and used IMPACT during 3 routine visits to an asthma clinic. The program takes approximately 1 hour 20 minutes to complete.

Received conventional asthma education, including verbal and written asthma information on the disease and concepts related to its control.

PEDIATRIC ASTHMA CARE KNOWLEDGE SURVEY FOR CHILDREN (7‐17), caregivers 0‐6, caregivers 7‐17, DAYS WITH ASTHMA SYMPTOMS, days of activity limitation, days of sleep disturbance, school days missed, URGENT VISITS TO THE PHYSICAN, ER VISITS, HOSPITALISATION, DAYS OF STAYS IN HOSPITAL, days of quick relief medicine, use of inhaled steroids

Lehmann 2001

Diabetes / AIDA

Italy

RCT, 2 arms intervention versus control. Partial cross‐over design.

24 adults with Type I Diabetes Mellitus; 50% male. Intervention group n = 12, control group n = 12.

18 / 24 = 75% (67% in control group; 83% in intervention group).

An interactive computer programme accessible via the world wide web. It contains information, behaviour change support and decision support.

Received 6 sessions using AIDA. Sessions lasted an average of 104 minutes. Participants did not interact directly with the computer but via a 'facilitator' as the programme software was written in English.

Received 6 sessions of conventional education (slides) on the same topics. After completing post‐test questionnaires they crossed over to receive 6 sessions on AIDA.

KNOWLEDGE SCORE, social and emotional impact of diabetes on lifestyle, self‐monitoring of blood glucose, forward thinking, well‐being and self‐confidence, hypoglycaemic attacks, HbA1C, empowerment

Mahoney 2002

Alzheimer's disease / Memory Loss CD

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

113 adults concerned about memory loss in a family member; intervention group n = 56, control group n = 57.

113 / 113 = 100%

A computer programme, delivered via a multimedia CD‐ROM. Decision support and peer support are contained within modules on 'Making Plans' and 'Common Family Experiences'.

Used the programme on a project laptop during a home interview with research staff.

Received no intervention and were offered the opportunity to view the CD‐ROM at the end of the research project.

KNOWLEDGE ABOUT MEMORY LOSS IN FAMILY MEMBERS; user satisfaction with the programme; CONTACTS WITH CLINICIANS

Ritterband 2003

Encopresis / U Can Poop Too

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

24 encopretic children; 19 boys; mean age 8.46 years (SD 1.81 years). Intervention group n = 12, control group n = 12.

24 / 24 = 100%

A computer programme delivered via the internet containing three core modules. Two provide information on encopresis and medication. The third provides behaviour change support via a detailed animated tutorial and a personalised instruction sheet.

Received in‐home access to the programme via a provided computer and internet connection. They received the programme for 3 weeks and accessed the website an average of 14 times per participant during that time.

Received phone calls only from research staff.

Bowel habits (child information form), ENCOPRESIS KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE (EKQ), VECAT (assesses bowel‐specific problems related to encopresis), NUMBER OF BOWEL ACCIDENTS PER WEEK, use of internet programme

Shegog 2001

Asthma / Watch Discover Think Act ( WDTA)

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

76 children recruited from clinics and schools; mean age 10.7 years; 47.9% white, non‐Hispanic participants; 40.8% African‐American participants; 7% Hispanic participants; 46 boys. 71 children completed the study of which intervention group n = 38, control n = 33.

71 / 76 = 93%; distribution of dropouts between groups not given.

An interactive multimedia computer game delivered via CD‐ROM. The programme provides intensive, tailored information on self‐management for children with asthma. Text, graphics, animation, sound and video clips are utilised, and behaviour support delivered via verbal reinforcement, guided practice, feedback goal setting and incentives. Data input = child's personal asthma symptoms, environmental triggers, medications, PEFR.

Participants in the intervention group played the game during a session organised at a university‐linked medical centre.

Received no intervention.

KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE ON ASTHMA MANAGEMENT, SELF‐EFFICACY FOR ASTHMA MANAGEMENT, causal attributions, attribution classification, demographic and health information, computer experience, motivation, attitude toward CAL, process of use

Smith 2000

Diabetes / WTW

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

30 women with Diabetes Mellitus (Type I or II); aged 35 to 60 years; with a telephone and living at least 25 miles outside the 6 major cities of Montana. Intervention group n = 15, control group n = 15.

Follow up rate not stated.

A computer programme accessed via a PC with modem connection. The software contained 4 components: conversation (online support group providing peer support ); mailbox (private e‐mail correspondence between group members); HealthChat (formal diabetes education); and Resource Rack (bulletin board).

Received in‐home access to the programme via a provided laptop for 5 months. They also received a notebook of health information regarding women's health in general and specific diabetes information.

Received paper copies of all the information materials that the intervention group received; that is, health information notebook and hard copies of computer‐generated information.

HBA1C, health status, sources of support, PERSONAL RESOURCE QUESTIONNAIRE, Quality of Life Index, Social Readjustment Rating Scale PSYCHOSOCIAL ADAPTION TO ILLNESS SCALE, usage of computer programme

Turnin 1992

Diabetes / Diabeto

France

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control. Crossover design.

105 patients with diabetes. 59% male; 72% Type I Diabetes Mellitus; 74% working; mean age 45 years. Intervention group n = 54, control group = 51.

Follow up rate not stated.

Interactive dietary information and individualised counselling delivered via a Minitel videotext terminal. The programme provides dietetic information for diabetic patients. Behaviour change support is provided via an individualised dossier containing energy requirements calculation and individualised meal analysis options, adapted menus, personalised advice and dietary and cardiovascular information.

Received in‐home access to Diabeto for 6 months.

No intervention for 6 months then crossed over to the intervention arm.

DIETETIC KNOWLEDGE SCORES, eating habits ‐ caloric excess, % of carbohydrate, carbohydrate deficit, REDUCTION OF % FAT OF CALORIFIC INTAKE, fat excess, changes in body weight, HBA1C

Turnin 2001

Obesity / Nutri‐Expert

France

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

557 obese patients: BMI > or equal to 33.3kg / m2. Mean age 41.2 y; 92.3% female; salaried workers 36.5%, unemployed or retired 23.1%, teaching or health care professions 14.1%. Of the 341 participants who completed the study intervention group n = 169, control group n = 172.

341 / 557 = 61%. Dropouts equally distributed between intervention and control group (88 from control group and 91 from intervention group)

Nutrition education software programme on obesity delivered via a Minitel videotext terminal containing information on nutrition for obese patients. Behavior change support is provided by energy requirements calculation and individualised meal analysis options, adapted menus and personalised advice. A discussion forum provides peer support.

Received usual care (7 medical/dietetic visits) plus in‐home access to the software programme via a provided terminal for 12 months.

Received usual care ( 7 medical/dietetic visits).

BMI, waist circumference, weight, DIETETIC KNOWLEDGE SCORES, dietary intake (CALORIFIC INTAKE, carbohydrate, sugar, protein and fat intake), fasting plasma insulin and lipids ‐ cholesterol

Wydra 2001

Cancer / Coping with Cancer

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

174 patients with cancer; 51% male; 81% white participants; age range = 21 to 82 years. Intervention group n = 86, control group n = 88.

160 / 174 = 92%; distribution of dropouts between groups not given.

Interactive Video Disc delivered via a video disc player. Provides information on fatigue, saving and maintaining energy, managing stress and sleeping better. Behaviour change support was provided by self‐management content of the modules eg. exercises to identify side effects, causes and patterns of problems such as fatigue.

Participants in the intervention group used the video disc at a single session in a cancer treatment centre.

Received usual care.

SELF CARE ACTIVITIES, wide range achievement test, self care ability

Wylie‐Rosett 2001

Obesity / CD‐ROM

USA

RCT, 3 arms: workbook only versus workbook + computer programme vs workbook + computer programme + staff counselling. For purposes of systematic review, intervention = computer programme + workbook; control = workbook only.

588 people; mean BMI = 35.6 kg/m2; 82% female; 83% white; 84%> 1yr of college; recruited from a managed care organisation. Workbook only (control group ) n = 116, workbook+computer group (intervention group) n = 236, workbook+computer+staff counselling n= 236. Sample size and n in each arm arrived at by authors in the light of data from studies.

Raw data not given; overall study completion rate given as 81% with dropout rates of 16% (n = 19), 22% (n = 53) and 17% for the least, intermediate and most intensive intervention groups respectively.

A multimedia computer programme providing information on nutrition and fitness. Behavior change support is delivered via psychobehavioural content such as the setting, reviewing and evaluation of chosen tailored behaviour goals on food intake and physical activity.

Participants in the intervention group accessed the programme via touchscreens in kiosks situated within a medical waiting room over a 12 month period. During the first 3 months, participants were asked to log on to the computer system at least once a week and thereafter at least once a month.

Received a workbook containing 20 sections with self‐help sheets.

KCAL PER DAY, % Kcal from fat, blocks walked daily, minutes walked continuously, weight, BMI, waist circumference, % of body fat, cholesterols, triglicerides, glucose, blood pressure, COST ANALYSIS, diabetes and cardiovascular risk, medication usage and evaluation of computer programme

* Outcome measures in capitals were selected for data synthesis.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Further Details of Included Studies
Table 2. Included Studies ‐ outcome data not utilised in meta ‐analyses

Study

Condition / IHCA

Country

Type of Study

Outcome Category

Outcome Measure

Reason for Omission

Brennan 1995

Alzhemier's disease / ComputerLink

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Social Support

Social isolation

This study presented data on carers rather than patients. For this reason data was not included in the social support meta‐analysis. An SMD however has been calculated and is presented in Additional Table 4.

Brennan 1998

Alzheimer's disease / ComputerLink

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Emotional

Depression ‐ CES‐D

Data not presented.

Dragone 2002

Cancer / Kidz with Leukemia

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Knowledge

Leukaemia event knowledge interview

Knowledge: mean and SD not given so not possible to calculate SMD from the data presented.

Gorman 1995

Urinary Incontinence / UICS

USA

RCT, 3 arms: UICS versus booklet (AHCPR patient guideline with handout) vs. control. For purposes of systematic review, UICS is compared with control.

Clinical

Episodes of urinary incontinence over 3 days

Clinical: mean no. of episodes at final assessment only presented. No standard deviations provided so SMD not calculable.

Homer 2000

Asthma / Asthma Control

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Knowledge, Clinical

Knowledge, Asthma Severity Score

Knowledge & Clinical: no standard deviations provided so SMD not calculable.

Horan 1990

Diabetes / DISC

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Clinical

HbA1c

Clinical: SMD not calculable as no data presented for HbA1c.

Huss 2003

Asthma / Wee Willie Wheezie

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Knowledge, Clinical

Asthma Knowledge Test, Spirometry

Knowledge: data on Asthma Knowledge Test not reported (Air Control questionnaire data presented only). Clinical: reported in text as no difference between groups. No final data presented on spirometry; SMD not calculable.

Lehmann 2001

Diabetes / AIDA

Italy

RCT, 2 arms intervention versus control. Partial cross‐over design.

Knowledge

Knowledge Questionnaire

Knowledge: Knowledge Questionnaire data not presented.

Mahoney 2002

Alzheimer's disease / Memory Loss CD‐ROM

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Knowledge

Knowledge about memory loss

Knowledge: this study presented data on carers rather than patients. For this reason it was not included in the knowledge outcome meta‐analysis. An SMD however has been calculated and is presented in Additional Table 3.

Ritterband 2003

Encopresis / U Can Poop Too

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Knowledge, Behavioural

Encopresis Knowledge Questionnaire, VECAT

Knowledge and Behavioural: not possible to calculate SMDs from data presented.

Smith 2000

Diabetes / WTW

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Social Support, Emotional, Clinical

Personal Resource Questionnaire, Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness (PAIS), HbA1c

Social Support: only mean scores and no SDs were presented; SMD not calculable. Emotional: data not presented.Clinical: no data presented for HbA1c.

Wydra 2001

Cancer / Coping with Cancer

USA

RCT, 2 arms: intervention versus control

Behavioural

Self‐care activities

Behavioural: SMD not calculable as no SD provided.

Wylie‐Rosett 2001

Obesity / CDROM

USA

RCT, 3 arms: workbook only versus workbook + computer programme vs workbook + computer programme + staff counselling. For purposes of systematic review, intervention = computer programme + workbook; control = workbook only.

Behavioural, Clinical

Reduction in dietary intake, reduction in BMI

Behavioral and Clinical: only change from baseline data provided. No final SD presented so SMD not calculable.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Included Studies ‐ outcome data not utilised in meta ‐analyses
Table 3. Knowledge

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

SMDs & Lipsey Cat.

Andrewes 1996

Eating Disorders Knowledge Questionnaire (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 27, Intervention = 27, Total = 54

1 week

0.76 (Large) Intervention

Bartholomew 2000

Knowledge Score (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 62, Intervention = 70, Total = 132

7.9 months (mean)

0.11 (Small) Intervention

Brown 1997

Knowledge Score (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 28, Intervention = 31, Total = 59

6 months

0.07 (Small) Intervention

Krishna 2003

Paed. Asthma Knowledge Care Survey (Children aged 7 to 17) (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 28, Intervention = 25, Total = 53

12 months

0.96 (Large) Intervention

Mahoney 2002

Knowledge Score Test (outcome improves as scale increases). Not used in meta‐analysis as study on carers.

Control = 57, Intervention = 56, Total 113

Immediately post‐test

1.41 (Large) Intervention

Shegog 2001

Knowledge Questionnaire (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 33, Intervention = 38, Total = 71

3 weeks

0.56 (Large) Intervention

Turnin 1992

Dietetic Knowledge (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 50, Intervention = 45, Total = 95

6 months

0.72 (Large) Intervention

Turnin 2001

Dietetic Knowledge Test (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 105, Intervention = 94, Total =199

12 months

0.31 (Small) Intervention

Binary Outcomes

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

Odds Ratio*

Horan 1990

Applied Diabetes Knowledge Score (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 9, Intervention = 9, Total = 18

18 Weeks

1.60

*Odds ratio. <1 = in favour of the control, >1 = in favour of the intervention

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Knowledge
Table 4. Social Support

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

SMDs & Lipsey Cat.

Brennan 1995

Reduced social isolation (outcome improves as scale decreases). Not used in meta‐analysis as study on carers.

Control = 49, Intervention = 47, Total = 96

12 months

‐0.14 (Small) Control

Brennan 1998

Reduced social isolation (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 23, Intervention = 25, Total = 48

6 months

0. 12 ( Small) Intervention

Brown 1997

Social support (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 28, Intervention = 31, Total = 59

6 months

0.18 (Small) Intervention

Glasgow 2003

Diabetes support scale (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 66, Intervention = 66, Total = 132

10 months

0.45 (Medium) Intervention

Gustafson 1999

Social support (outcome improves as scale increases)

Contol = 24, Intervention = 27, Total = 51*

5 months

0.51(Medium) Intervention

Gustafson 2001

Social support (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 125, Intervention = 121, Total = 246*

5 months

0.35 (Medium) Intervention

* Data provided by authors

Figuras y tablas -
Table 4. Social Support
Table 5. Self‐efficacy

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

SMDs & Lipsey Cat.

Bartholomew 2000

Child Self‐efficacy expectations (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 69, Intervention = 70, Total = 139

7.9 months (mean)

0.14 (Small) Intervention

Brown 1997

Perceived self‐efficacy (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 28, Intervention = 31, Total = 59

6 months

0.20 (Small) Intervention

Shegog 2001

Child self‐efficacy for asthma self‐management (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 32, Intervention = 38, Total = 70

3 weeks

0.48 (Medium) Intervention

Figuras y tablas -
Table 5. Self‐efficacy
Table 6. Behavioural Outcomes

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

SMDs & Lipsey Cat.

Bartholomew 2000

Child self‐ management (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 63, Intervention = 69, Total = 132

7.9 months (mean)

0.32 (Small) Intervention

Brown 1997

Diabetes self‐care rating scale (outcome improves as the scale increases)

Control = 28, Intervention = 31, Total = 59

6 months

0.43 (Medium) Intervention

Glasgow 2003

Average mins. of activity per day (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 66, Intervention = 66, Total = 132

10 months

‐0.09 (Small) Control

Gustafson 1999

Participation in health care (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 23, Intervention = 24, Total = 47

5 months

0.77 (Large) Intervention

Gustafson 2001

Behaviourial involvement in health care (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 125, Intervention = 119, Total = 244*

5 months

0.11 (Small) Intervention

Turnin 1992

Reduction in % fat of calorific intake (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 46, Intervention = 43, Total = 89

6 months

0.44 (Medium) Intervention

Turnin 2001

Reduction in caloric intake (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 97, Intervention = 89, Total = 186

12 months

‐0.06 (Small) Control

* Data provided by authors

Binary Outcomes

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

Odds Ratios**

Guendelman 2002

% of pts taking asthma medication without reminder. Binary outcome analysed separately.

Control = 52, Intervention = 58, Total = 110

12 weeks

2.88

Homer 2000

% of pts with peak flow metre available. Binary outcome analysed separately.

Control = 49, Intervention = 57, Total = 106

> 9 months

0.91

Horan 1990

% of pts who changed exercise behaviour. Binary outcome analysed separately.

Control = 10, Intervention = 10, Total = 20

18 weeks

2.33

** Odds ratio. <1 = in favour of the control, >1 = in favour of the intervention.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 6. Behavioural Outcomes
Table 7. Clinical Outcomes

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

SMDs & Lipsey Cat.

Bartholomew 2000

Functional status (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 55, Intervention = 58 , Total = 113

7.9 months (mean)

0.21 (Small) Intervention

Brennan 1998

Health status (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 23, Intervention = 25, Total = 48

6 months

‐0.42 (Medium) Control

Brown 1997

Reduction in HbA1c (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 28, Intervention = 31 , Total = 59

6 months

‐0.23(Small) Control

Glasgow 2003

Reduction in HbA1c (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 66, Intervention = 66, Total = 132

10 months

0.24 (Small) Intervention

Gustafson 1999

Physical function (outcome improves as scale increases)

Control = 24, Intervention = 26, Total = 50

5 months

0.07 (Small) Intervention

Krishna 2003

Decrease in days with asthma symptoms (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 44, Intervention = 42 , Total = 86

12 months

0.40 (Medium) Intervention

Lehmann 2003

Reduction in HbA1c (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 8 , Intervention = 10, Total = 18

6 weeks

0.77 (Large) Intervention

Ritterband 2003

Decrease in bowel accidents per week ( outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 12, Intervention = 12 , Total = 24

3 weeks

0.77 (Large) Intervention

Turnin 1992

Reduction in HbA1c (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 50, Intervention = 45, Total = 95

6 months

0.42 (Medium) Intervention

Turnin 2001

Decrease in BMI (outcome improves as scale decreases)

Control = 120, Intervention = 110, Total = 230

12 months

0.10 (Small) Intervention

Binary Outcomes

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

Odds Ratio*

Guendelman 2002

Reduction in limitations in activity. Not included in this meta‐analysis and not presented in separate meta‐analysis as single binary result.

Control = 60, Intervention = 62, Total = 122

12 weeks

1.84

* Odds ratio. <1 = in favour of the control, >1 = in favour of the intervention

Figuras y tablas -
Table 7. Clinical Outcomes
Table 8. Emotional Outcomes

Study

Measurement

No. at End Point

Outcome Timescale

SMD & Lipsey Cat.

Brennan 1995 (study on carers)

Depression CES‐D

Control = 49, Intervention = 47, Total = 96

12 months

‐0.30 (Small) Control

Glasgow 2003

Depression CES‐D

Control = 66, Intervention = 66 , Total = 132

10 months

0.16 (Small) Intervention

Gustafson 1999

Depression MOS

Control = 24, Intervention = 27, Total = 51

5 months

0.24 (Small) Invtervention

Gustafson 2001

Emotional Well ‐Being Fact ‐B

Control = 125, Intervention = 121, Total = 246

5 months

0.06* (Small) Intervention

* using pooled SDs

Figuras y tablas -
Table 8. Emotional Outcomes
Comparison 1. IHCA versus Control. Knowledge

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Knowledge [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values] Show forest plot

7

663

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.22, 0.69]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. IHCA versus Control. Knowledge
Comparison 2. IHCA versus Control. Social Support

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Social support [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values] Show forest plot

5

536

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.18, 0.52]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. IHCA versus Control. Social Support
Comparison 3. IHCA versus Control. Self ‐efficacy

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Self‐efficacy [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values] Show forest plot

3

268

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.00, 0.48]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. IHCA versus Control. Self ‐efficacy
Comparison 4. IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Behavioural outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values] Show forest plot

7

889

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.01, 0.40]

2 Behavioural outcomes [Final Odds Ratios] Show forest plot

3

236

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.66 [0.71, 3.87]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. IHCA versus Control. Behavioural outcomes
Comparison 5. IHCA versus Control. Clinical outcomes

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical outcomes [Standardised Mean Difference of Final Values] Show forest plot

10

855

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.01, 0.35]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. IHCA versus Control. Clinical outcomes