Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Tratamiento de compresión para la prevención del síndrome postrombótico

Appendices

Appendix 1. CENTRAL search strategy March 2017

Search run on Fri Mar 10 2017

#1

MESH DESCRIPTOR Postthrombotic Syndrome EXPLODE ALL TREES

28

#2

postthrombotic:TI,AB,KY

68

#3

(post near3 thrombot*):TI,AB,KY

146

#4

PTS*:TI,AB,KY

8745

#5

MESH DESCRIPTOR Postphlebitic Syndrome EXPLODE ALL TREES

24

#6

postphlebit*:TI,AB,KY

36

#7

(post near3 phlebit*):TI,AB,KY

15

#8

#1 OR #2 OR #3 OR #4 OR #5 OR #6 OR #7

8905

#9

MESH DESCRIPTOR Bandages

1409

#10

MESH DESCRIPTOR Compression Bandages EXPLODE ALL TREES

254

#11

(stocking* or hosiery or tights or sock*):TI,AB,KY

1442

#12

compress*:TI,AB,KY

5957

#13

#9 OR #10 OR #11 OR #12

7796

#14

#8 AND #13

125

#15

* NOT SR‐PVD:CC

1014031

#16

#14 AND #15

72

Appendix 2. Trial registries searches March 2017

ClinicalTrials.gov

28 studies found for: (postthrombotic OR post‐thrombotic) AND (compression OR stocking OR bandage)

World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform

10 reports of 10 trials for

(postthrombotic OR post‐thrombotic) in Title or Condition

and (compression OR stocking OR bandage) in Intervention

ISRCTN Register

10 results postthrombotic OR post‐thrombotic

Appendix 3. Database searches July 2018

Source

Search strategy

Hits retrieved

CENTRAL via CRSO

#1 MESH DESCRIPTOR Postthrombotic Syndrome EXPLODE ALL TREES 73

#2 postthrombotic:TI,AB,KY 121

#3 (post near3 thrombot*):TI,AB,KY 193

#4 PTS*:TI,AB,KY 13458

#5 MESH DESCRIPTOR Postphlebitic Syndrome EXPLODE ALL TREES 59

#6 postphlebit*:TI,AB,KY 71

#7 (post near3 phlebit*):TI,AB,KY 16

#8 #1 OR #2 OR #3 OR #4 OR #5 OR #6 OR #7 13677

#9 MESH DESCRIPTOR Bandages 1505

#10 MESH DESCRIPTOR Compression Bandages EXPLODE ALL TREES 307

#11 (stocking* or hosiery or tights or sock*):TI,AB,KY 1827

#12 compress*:TI,AB,KY 7559

#13 #9 OR #10 OR #11 OR #12 9757

#14 #8 AND #13 158

#15 01/01/2017 TO 02/07/2018:CD 292648

#16 #14 AND #15 42

42

Clinicaltrials.gov

post‐thrombotic OR Postphlebitic OR Postthrombotic | stocking* OR hosiery OR tights OR sock* OR Bandages OR Compression | Start date on or after 01/01/2017 | Last update posted on or before 07/02/2018

7

ICTRP Search Portal

1

MEDLINE

1 exp Postthrombotic Syndrome/ 582

2 postthrombotic.ti,ab. 822

3 (post adj3 thrombot*).ti,ab. 1422

4 PTS*.ti,ab. 31964

5 exp Postphlebitic Syndrome/ 625

6 postphlebit*.ti,ab. 455

7 (post adj3 phlebit*).ti,ab. 318

8 or/1‐7 34763

9 BANDAGES/ 15813

10 exp Compression Bandages/ 2077

11 (stocking* or hosiery or tights or sock*).ti,ab. 13552

12 compress*.ti,ab. 138887

13 or/9‐12 164825

14 8 and 13 708

15 (2017* or 2018*).ed. 1414704

16 14 and 15 52

52

Embase

1 exp postthrombosis syndrome/ 2534

2 postthrombotic.ti,ab. 1223

3 (post adj3 thrombot*).ti,ab. 2193

4 PTS*.ti,ab. 117282

5 exp chronic vein insufficiency/ 3520

6 postphlebit*.ti,ab. 470

7 (post adj3 phlebit*).ti,ab. 332

8 or/1‐7 124321

9 bandage/ 10647

10 exp compression bandage/ 2145

11 (stocking* or hosiery or tights or sock*).ti,ab. 16365

12 compress*.ti,ab. 171688

13 or/9‐12 195287

14 8 and 13 2015

15 randomized controlled trial/ 507666

16 controlled clinical trial/ 460068

17 random$.ti,ab. 1314352

18 randomization/ 78496

19 intermethod comparison/ 236587

20 placebo.ti,ab. 274310

21 (compare or compared or comparison).ti. 470900

22 ((evaluated or evaluate or evaluating or assessed or assess) and (compare or compared or comparing or comparison)).ab. 1760878

23 (open adj label).ti,ab. 64733

24 ((double or single or doubly or singly) adj (blind or blinded or blindly)).ti,ab. 209628

25 double blind procedure/ 151259

26 parallel group$1.ti,ab. 21867

27 (crossover or cross over).ti,ab. 93244

28 ((assign$ or match or matched or allocation) adj5 (alternate or group$1 or intervention$1 or patient$1 or subject$1 or participant$1)).ti,ab. 284035

29 (assigned or allocated).ti,ab. 333229

30 (controlled adj7 (study or design or trial)).ti,ab. 296091

31 (volunteer or volunteers).ti,ab. 224978

32 trial.ti. 251985

33 or/15‐32 4052435

34 14 and 33 644

35 (2017* or 2018*).em. 3645726

36 34 and 35 97

37 from 36 keep 1‐97 97

97

CINAHL

S31 S29 AND S30 3

S30 EM 2017 OR EM 2018 371,243

S29 S13 AND S28 70

S28 S14 OR S15 OR S16 OR S17 OR S18 OR S19 OR S20 OR S21 OR S22 OR S23 OR S24 OR S25 OR S26 OR S27 342,293

S27 MH "Random Assignment" 38,732

S26 MH "Triple‐Blind Studies" 85

S25 MH "Double‐Blind Studies" 24,826

S24 MH "Single‐Blind Studies" 7,986

S23 MH "Crossover Design" 11,215

S22 MH "Factorial Design" 919

S21 MH "Placebos" 8,355

S20 MH "Clinical Trials" 93,004

S19 TX "multi‐centre study" OR "multi‐center study" OR "multicentre study" OR "multicenter study" OR "multi‐site study" 4,486

S18 TX crossover OR "cross‐over" 14,567

S17 AB placebo* 28,322

S16 TX random* 219,135

S15 TX trial* 250,574

S14 TX "latin square" 142

S13 S7 AND S12 155

S12 S8 OR S9 OR S10 OR S11 27,971

S11 TX compress* 15,914

S10 TX stocking* or hosiery or tights or sock* 5,717

S9 (MH "Elastic Bandages") 115

S8 (MH "Bandages and Dressings") 7,898

S7 S1 OR S2 OR S3 OR S4 OR S5 OR S6 9,103

S6 TX post n3 phlebit* 15

S5 TX postphlebit* 19

S4 TX PTS* 8,928

S3 TX post n3 thrombot* 96

S2 TX postthrombotic 110

S1 (MH "Postthrombotic Syndrome") 62

3

AMED

1 postthrombotic.ti,ab. 3

2 (post adj3 thrombot*).ti,ab. 5

3 PTS*.ti,ab. 634

4 postphlebit*.ti,ab. 0

5 (post adj3 phlebit*).mp. [mp=abstract, heading words, title] 0

6 or/1‐5 640

7 exp Bandages/ 604

8 (stocking* or hosiery or tights or sock*).ti,ab. 442

9 compress*.ti,ab. 2149

10 or/7‐9 3051

11 6 and 10 4

12 ("2017" or "2018").yr. 2075

13 11 and 12 0

0

Appendix 4. Symptom/functionality scores (Ginsberg 1999)

Participant

Therapeutic (50 mmHg)

Placebo (15 mmHg)

1

27

24

2

19

17

3

22

17

4

22

18

5

10

9

6

9

5

7

25

24

8

21

18

9

15

13

10

15

13

11

15

10

12

15

10

13

15

15

14

7

12

15

10

10

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Graduated elastic compression stockings for the treatment of PTS

Graduated elastic compression stockings compared with placebo stockings or no compression for the treatment of PTS

Patient or population: adults with PTS

Settings: hospitals and clinical centres

Intervention: GECSa

Comparison: placebo stockings or no compression

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

placebo stockings

GECS

Severity of post‐thrombotic syndromeb

(follow‐up: 0–25.6 months)

Ginsberg 2001 reported 61.1% (11/18) treatment failures in the GECS group and 58.8% (10/17) treatment failure in the placebo group.

Lattimer 2013 reported the VFI, VFT90, and VV significantly improved with GECS compared with no compression.

VFI: no compression median 4.9 (range 1.7 to 16.3)

BKI median 3.7 (range 0–14; 24.5% percentage improvement)

AKI median 3.6 (range 0.6–14.5; 26.5%)

BKII median 4.0 (range 0.3–16.2; 18.8%)

AKII median 3.7 (range 0.5–14.2; 24.5%)

69

(2 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowc

2 small studies of short duration were identified. 1 reported benefit and 1 no benefit from GECS use.

Adverse effects

(follow‐up: 25.6 months)

Ginsberg 2001 reported no participants developed ulceration in both groups

Lattimer 2013 did not assess adverse effects.

Patient satisfaction and quality of life

See comments

No study measured quality of life. Lattimer 2013 assessed patient preferences. 52.5% of participants indicated they wanted to change their compression to another type of stocking, 38% of these preferred an AK stocking.

Compliance rate

See comments

Lattimer 2013 and Ginsberg 2001 did not assess compliance rates during the study period.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

AKI/II: above‐knee thigh length stocking class I or II; BKI/II: below‐knee class I or II; CI: confidence interval; GECS: graduated elastic compression stockings; PTS: post‐thrombotic syndrome; RCT: randomised controlled trial; VFI: venous filling index; VFT90: venous filling time; VV: venous volume.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate certainty: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low certainty: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low certainty: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

aGinsberg 2001 compared compression stockings (30 mmHg to 40 mmHg) with placebo stockings (one to two sizes too large). Calf length or thigh length compression stockings were administered depending on the localisation of complaints. Lattimer 2013 assessed four different stockings and assessed improvements of compression and length (of their size in random order: class I (18 mmHg to 21 mmHg) and class II (23 mmHg to 32 mmHg), BK and AK.
bGinsberg 2001 defined treatment failure as pain and swelling that did not improve, or worsened, after the first three months; or worsening of symptoms during further follow‐up; or symptoms that prevented participants from performing their daily activities for five or more days in any three‐month period; or developing a leg ulcer. Lattimer 2013 used Venous Clinical Severity Score, the C part of the CEAP and the Villalta Scale to assess the severity of PTS.
cDowngraded three levels owing to conflicting results, small sample size, and different outcome measures.
dDowngraded two levels due to small study size and self‐reported outcomes.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Graduated elastic compression stockings for the treatment of PTS
Summary of findings 2. Intermittent pneumatic compression devices for the treatment of PTS

Intermittent pneumatic compression devices compared with control devices for the treatment of PTS

Patient or population: adults with PTS

Settings: hospitals and clinical centres

Intervention: medical compression devicea

Comparison: control device

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control device

Medical compression device

Severity post‐thrombotic syndromeb

(follow‐up: 8–20 weeks)

Ginsberg 1999: 80% (12/15) of participants had an improvement in symptom score that was considered a treatment success. The mean difference in scoring at the 2 pressure levels was –2.1 (95% CI –3.6 to –0.7; P = 0.007)

O'Donnell 2008: an improvement in Villalta score was reported in the Venowave group (12) compared to the control device group (15) (P = 0.004)

47

(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowc

Control devices were used on the same participants that used medical device.

Adverse effects

(follow‐up: 20 weeks)

O'Donnell 2008 reported 9% (3/32) of participants experienced adverse effects, including leg swelling, irritation, superficial bleeding, and skin itching related to Venowave device use

32

(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderated

Not measured by Ginsberg 1999.

Patient satisfaction and quality of life

(follow‐up: 20 weeks)

O'Donnell 2008 reported the mean VEINES‐QoL score at the end of the study period was significantly higher for Venowave (53) than for the control device (50) (P = 0.004)

32

(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderated

Not measured by Ginsberg 1999.

Compliance rate

See comments

No study measured this outcome.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; PTS: post‐thrombotic syndrome; RCT: randomised controlled trial; QoL: quality of life; VEINES‐QOL: VEnous INsufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study – Quality of Life.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate certainty: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low certainty: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low certainty: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

aGinsberg 1999 used an extremity pump twice daily at either 50 mmHg pressure or 15 mmHg pressure. O'Donnell 2008 used Venowave, a lower‐limb venous‐return assist device.
bStudies measured severity differently. Ginsberg 1999 assessed severity using own method (questionnaire assessing symptoms and functional status). O'Donnell 2008 assessed severity using Villalta score.
cDowngraded two levels owing to high heterogeneity between studies, different measurements used by studies reporting on this outcome and small studies of short duration.
dDowngraded one level owing to one small study of short duration.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Intermittent pneumatic compression devices for the treatment of PTS