Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Scalpel versus no‐scalpel incision for vasectomy

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 30 marzo 2014

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004112.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 18 octubre 2006see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Regulación de la fertilidad

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2007 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Lynley A Cook

    Correspondencia a: Public Health and General Practice, Christchurch School of Medicine, Christchurch, New Zealand

    [email protected]

  • Asha Pun

    Nepal Family Health Program, Kathmandu, Nepal

  • H van Vliet

    Other

  • Maria M.F. Gallo

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA

  • Laureen M Lopez

    Clinical Research Department, Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, USA

  • Huib HAAM Van Vliet

    Dep.of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medecine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Contributions of authors

A Pun and L Cook did the data abstraction. L Lopez updated the search in 2006 and added the Plain Language Summary. All authors were involved in the review development and all edited the manuscript.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • U.S. Agency for International Development, USA.

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, USA.

Declarations of interest

One of the co‐authors (L Lopez) is employed at Family Health International where one of the included trials was conducted (Sokal 1999).

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Carol Manion of Family Health International, who assisted with the literature searches, and David Grimes and David Sokal of Family Health International, who assisted in reviewing the manuscript.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Mar 30

Scalpel versus no‐scalpel incision for vasectomy

Review

Lynley A Cook, Asha Pun, Maria F Gallo, Laureen M Lopez, Huib AAM Van Vliet

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004112.pub4

2007 Apr 18

Scalpel versus no‐scalpel incision for vasectomy

Review

Lynley A Cook, Asha Pun, Maria F Gallo, Laureen M Lopez, Huib AAM Van Vliet

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004112.pub3

2006 Oct 18

Scalpel versus no‐scalpel incision for vasectomy

Review

Lynley A Cook, Asha Pun, H van Vliet, Maria M.F. Gallo, Laureen M Lopez, Huib HAAM Van Vliet

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004112.pub2

2003 Apr 22

Scalpel versus no scalpel incision for vasectomy

Protocol

Lynley A L.A. Cook, Asha Pun, Huib HAAM Van Vliet, Maria M.F. Gallo

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004112

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.