Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Azatioprina para la esclerosis múltiple

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

British & Dutch 1988 {published data only}

British and Dutch Multiple Sclerosis Azathioprine Trial Group. Double‐masked trial of azathioprine in multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1988;2:179‐83.
The British and Dutch Multiple Sclerosis Azathioprine Trial Group. Double‐blind controlled trial of azathioprine in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry1987; Vol. 50:1387.

Ellison 1989 {published data only}

Ellison GW, Myers LW, Mickey ME, Graves MC, Tourtellotte WW, Syndulko, et al. A placebo‐controlled, randomized, double‐masked, variable dosage, clinical trial of azathioprine with and without methylprednisolone in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1989;39:1018‐26.

Ghezzi 1989 {published data only}

Ghezzi A, Di Falco M, Locatelli C, et al. Clinical controlled randomized trial of azathioprine in multiple sclerosis. In: Consette RE, Delmotte P editor(s). Recent advances in multiple sclerosis therapy. Elsevier, 1989.

Goodkin 1991 {published data only}

Goodkin DE, Bailly RC, Teetzen ML, Hertsgaard D, Beatty WW. The efficacy of azathioprine in relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1991;41:20‐5.

Milanese 1993 {published data only}

Milanese C, La Mantia L, Salmaggi A, Eoli M. A double blind study on azathioprine efficacy in multiple sclerosis: final report. Journal of Neurology 1993;240:295‐8.

References to studies excluded from this review

Aimard 1983 {published data only}

Aimard G, Confavreux C, Ventre JJ, Guillot M, Devic M. Etude de 213 cas de sclerose en plaques traites par l' azathioprine de 1967‐ a 1982. Revue Neurologique 1983;139:509‐13.

Cendrowski 1971 {published data only}

Cendrowski WS. Therapeutic trial of azathioprine in MS. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 1971;47:254‐60.

Fratiglioni 1988 {published data only}

Fratiglioni L, Siracusa GF, Amato MP, Sità D, Amaducci L. Effectiveness of azathioprine treatment in multiple sclerosis. Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences 1988;9:261‐4.

Mertin 1980 {published data only}

Mertin J, Rudge P, Knight SC, Thompson EJ, Healy MJR. Double‐blind controlled trial of immunosuppression in the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis. Lancet 1980;2:949‐51.

Mertin 1982 {published data only}

Mertin J, Rudge P, Kreemer R, Healey MJ, Knight SC, Compston A, et al. Double‐blind Controlled Trial of Immunosuppression in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: Final Report. Lancet 1982;2:351‐4.

Minderhoud 1988 {published data only}

Minderhoud JM, Prange AJ, Luyckx GJ. A long‐term double‐blind controlled study on the effect of azathioprine in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 1988;90:25‐8.

Patzold 1982 {published data only}

Patzold U, Hecker H, Pocklington P. Azathioprine in treatment of multiple sclerosis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 1982;54:377‐94.
Patzold U, Pocklington P. Azathioprine in Multiple Sclerosis‐ A 3 year controlled study of its effectiveness. Journal of Neurology 1980;223:97‐117.

Rosen 1979 {published data only}

Rosen JA. Prolonged azathioprine treatment of non‐remitting muliptle sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1979;42:338‐44.

Silberberg 1973 {published data only}

Silberberg D, Lisak R, Zwieman B. MS unaffected by azathioprine in pilot study. Archives of Neurology 1973;28:210‐12.

Swinburn 1973 {published data only}

* * Swinburn WR, Liversedge LA. Long‐term treatment of multiple sclerosis with azathioprine. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1973;36:124‐6.

Zeeberg 1985 {published data only}

Zeeberg IE, Heltberg A, Fog T. Follow‐up evaluation after at least two years' treatment with azathioprine in a double‐blind trial. European Neurology 1985;24:435‐6.

Zeeberg 1986 {published data only}

Zeeberg IE. Azathioprine Assessment in Progressive Multiple sclerosis. Clinical Aspects. In: Hommes OR editor(s). Multiple Sclerosis Research in Europe. Lanchaster, England: MTP, 1986:62‐70.

Additional references

ADRAC 2006

The Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Bulletin. Drug induced pancreatitis. http://www.tga.gov.au/adr/aadrb/aadr0612.htm#a1 (access January 12 2007)2006; Vol. 25, issue 6.

Amato 1993

Amato MP, Pracucci G, Ponziani G, Siracusa G, Fratiglioni L, Amaducci L. Long‐term safety of azathioprine therapy in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1993;43(4):831‐3. [MEDLINE: 8469348]

Anstey 2004

Anstey AV, Wakelin S, Reynolds NJ, British Association of Dermatologists Therapy, Guidelines and Audit Subcommittee. Guidelines for prescribing azathioprine in dermatology. British Journal of Dermatolology 2004;151(6):1123‐32. [MEDLINE: 15606506]

Confavreux 1996

Confavreux C, Saddier P, Grimaud J, Moreau T, Adeleine P, Aimard G. Risk of cancer from azathioprine therapy in multiple sclerosis: a case‐control study. Neurology 1996;46(6):1607‐12.

Ebers 2006

Ebers GC. Disease evolution in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology 2006;253(Suppl 6):vi3‐8. [MEDLINE: 17091228]

Elion 1993

Elion GB. The George Hitchings and Gertrude Elion Lecture. The pharmacology of azathioprine. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 1993;685:400‐7. [MEDLINE: 8363248]

Higgins 2005

Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Assessment of study quality. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5 [updated May 2005]; Section 6. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2005. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd..

Hommes 2004

Hommes OR, Weiner HL. Clinical practice of immunosuppressive treatments in MS: results of a second international questionnaire. Journal Neurological Science 2004;223:65‐7.

Jones 1996

M. Jones, D. Symmons, J. Finn, F. Wolfe. Does exposure to immunosuppressive therapy increase the 10 year malignancy and mortality risks in rheumatoid arthritis? A matched cohort study. British Journal Rheumatology 1996;35(8):738‐45.

Kinlen 1985

Kinlen LJ. Incidence of cancer in rheumatoid arthritis and other disorders after immunosuppressive treatment. American Journal Medicine 1985;78(1A):44‐9. [MEDLINE: 3970040]

Knipp 2005

Knipp S, Hildebrandt B, Richter J, Haas R, Germing U, Gattermann N. Secondary myelodysplastic syndromes following treatment with azathioprine are associated with aberrations of chromosome 7. Haematologica 2005;90(5):691‐3. [MEDLINE: 15921387]

Kremenchutzky 2006

Kremenchutzky M, Rice GP, Baskerville J, Wingerchuk DM, Ebers GC. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study 9: observations on the progressive phase of the disease. Brain 2006;129:584‐94. [MEDLINE: 16401620]

Kurtzke 1983

Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444‐52.

Lhermitte 1984

Lhermitte F, Marteau R, Roullet E, de Saxce H, Loridan M. Prolonged treatment of multiple sclerosis with average doses of azathioprine. An evaluation of 15 years' experience. Review Neurology (Paris) 1984;140(10):553‐8. [MEDLINE: 6438761]

Loke 2005

Loke YK, Price D, Herxheimer A. Including adverse effects. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5 [updated May 2005]; Appendix 6b. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2005.

Lublin 1996

Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiplosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology 1996;46:907‐11.

Massacesi 2005

Massacesi L, Parigi A, Barilaro A, Repice AM, Pellicano G, Konze A, et al. Efficacy of azathioprine on multiple sclerosis new brain lesions evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging. Archives of Neurology 2005;62(12):1843‐7.

Masunaga 2007

Masunaga Y, Ohno K, Ogawa R, Hashiguchi M, Echizen H, Ogata H. Meta‐Analysis of Risk of Malignancy with Immunosuppressive Drugs in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Annals Pharmacotherapy 2007;41(1):21‐8. [MEDLINE: 17200426]

McCabe 2003

McCabe CJ, Chilcott J, Tappenden P, O'Hagan A, Claxton K, Abrams K, et al. Problems with the MS Risk sharing scheme. British Medical Journal2003.

McEwan 1972

McEwan A, Petty LG. Oncogenicity of immunosuppressive drugs. Lancet 1972;1(7745):326‐7.

Palace 1997

Palace J, Rothwell P. New treatments and azathioprine in multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1997;350:261. [MEDLINE: 9242805]

Patel 2006

Patel AA, Swerlick RA, McCall CO. Azathioprine in dermatology: the past, the present, and the future. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2006;55(3):369‐89. [MEDLINE: 16908341]

Poser 1983

Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, McDonald WI, Davis FA, Ebers GC, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Annals Neurology 1983;13:227‐31.

Putzki 2006

Putzki N, Knipp S, Ramczykowski T, Vago S, Germing U, Diener HC, et al. Secondary myelodysplastic syndrome following long‐term treatment with azathioprine in patients with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis 2006;12(3):363‐6. [MEDLINE: 16764353]

Rosman 1973

Rosman M, Bertino JR. Azathioprine. Annals of Internal Medicine 1973;79(5):694‐700. [MEDLINE: 4584569]

Rundles 1961

Rundles RW, Laszlo J, Itoga T, Hobson JB, Garrison FE. Clinical and hematologic study of 6[(1‐methyl‐4‐nitro‐5‐imidazolyl)thio]‐purine (B.W.57‐322) and related compounds. Cancer Chemotherapy Reports 1961;14:99‐115. [MEDLINE: 14038848]

Silman 1988

Silman AJ, Petrie J, Hazleman B, Evans SJ. Lymphoproliferative cancer and other malignancy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with azathioprine: a 20 year follow up study. Annals Rheumatologic Diseases 1988;47(12):988‐92. [MEDLINE: 3207388]

Sudlow 2003

Sudlow CL, Counsell CE. Problems with UK government's risk sharing scheme for assessing drugs for multiple sclerosis. British Medical Journal 2003;326(7385):388‐92. [MEDLINE: 12586677]

Taylor 2004

Taylor L, Hughes RAC, McPherson K. The risk of cancer from azathioprine as a treatment of multiple sclerosis. European Journal of Neurology 2004;11(2):141‐2. [MEDLINE: 14748776]

Tiede 2003

Tiede I, Fritz G, Strand S, Poppe D, Dvorsky R, Strand D, et al. CD28‐dependent Rac1 activation is the molecular target of azathioprine in primary human CD41 T lymphocytes. Journal Clinical Investigation 2003;111:1133‐45.

Weinshenker 1989

Weinshenker BG, Bass B, Rice GP, Noseworthy J, Carriere W, Baskerville J, et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. I. Clinical course and disability. Brain 1989;112:133‐46.

Willerding‐Mollmann

Willerding‐Mollmann S, Wilkens L, Schlegelberger B, Kaiser U. Azathioprine‐associated myelodysplastic syndrome with cytogenetic aberrations. Deuttsch Medizinische Wochenschrift 2004;129(22):1246‐8. [MEDLINE: 15170581]

Yudkin 1991

Yudkin PL, Ellison GW, Ghezzi A, Goodkin DE, Hughes RA, McPherson K, et al. Overview of azathioprine treatment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1991;338(8774):1051‐5. [MEDLINE: 1681364]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

British & Dutch 1988

Methods

The randomisation sequence was generated for each centre by the trial statistician and the packs of trial tablets were issued to individual pharmacies labelled with a code. The aza and placebo tablets were identical.
Blindness: double.
Design: parallel group.
Duration: 3 years treatment/follow‐up.
Intention to treat analysis: performed.

Participants

RRMS N= 236 (67%); SPMS N= 67 (18%) ; PPMS N= 51 (15%) .
N= 354 (azathioprine 174; placebo 180).
N= 332 followed patients at 3 years (azathioprine 161; placebo 171).
Sex: 207 females, 147 males.
Age: mean 39 years (azathioprine); mean 38 years (placebo).
Disease duration: mean 9 years.
EDSS: mean 3.7(1.5) (azathioprine); mean 3.7 (1.6) (placebo).
Exclusion criteria: patients on other immunomodulatory drugs or hyperbaric oxygen treatment, or patients with concomitant systemic disease and mental deficit.
UK and Holland. 20 Centers.

Interventions

1. Azathioprine 2.5 mg/kg/day (to the nearest 25 mg). Control: placebo.
2. PLacebo

Outcomes

Mean change in EDSS score, Kurtzke functional scales and ambulation Index at 1, 2 and 3 years.
Mean (SE) number of relapse per patient per year at 1, 2 and 3 years.

Notes

23 (6.5%) people were lost to 3 years follow‐up (14 azathioprine, 9 placebo); reasons ‐ 3 persons (azathioprine) died of a cause unrelated to MS; 16 persons (11 azathioprine, 5 placebo) declined to attend; 2 persons (placebo) emigrated; reasons not reported for 2 persons (placebo).
Drop‐outs/withdrawals: 1st year 47 (35 azathioprine, 12 placebo); 2nd year 16 (6 azathioprine, 10 placebo); 3rd year 11 (5 azathioprine, 6 placebo).
People who dropped‐out were included in analysis.
Supported by the Medical Research Council. Wellcome Research laboratories supplied AZA and placebo tablets.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Ellison 1989

Methods

Allocation: randomised (3 arms) ‐ blocks of 4 patients. Allocation masked: patient sequence was the order of presenting the initial prescription to the pharmacy.
Blindness: double.
Design: parallel group.
Duration: 3 years treatment/follow‐up.
Intention to treat analysis: performed.

Participants

MS patients in progressive phase
N=65 (31 azathioprine and placebo; 34 placebo).
N= 54 (83%) included in analysis (26 azathioprine and placebo; 28 placebo).
Sex: 32 females, 22 males.
Age at onset: mean 31 years (azathioprine); mean 33 years (placebo).
Disease duration: mean 16.7 years (azathioprine); mean 12.6 years (placebo).
DSS: mean 5.6 (1.3) (azathioprine); mean 5.5 (1.0) (placebo).
Exclusion criteria: pregnancy or pregnancy planned within the next 3 years; men wishing to father offpring during the next 3 years. Infections not under treatment. Pressure ulcers. Active coccidiomycosis, past or present neiplastic diseases, diseases that compromise neurological assessment ( deformimg arthritis, major amputations, psycoses) Cytotoxic therapy within the preceding 6 months, steroids within the preceding 3 months, relapses within the 3 months before.
USA 1 centre

Interventions

1. Azathioprine started at 2.2 mg/kg/day (to the nearest 25 mg) up to above 4.4 mg/kg/day until the white blood cell count was mantained between 3000 to 4000 or adverse effects were encountered . Placebo i.v. preparation was added.
2. Placebo

Outcomes

Mean difference DSS score at 3 years (ending minus baseline).
Number of patients who worsened defined as a change in DSS over 3 years
Number of relapses for patient at 1, 2 and 3 years.
Frequency of adverse events.

Notes

13 (19%) people were lost to 3 years follow‐up (7 azathioprine, 6 placebo); reasons ‐ 3 persons (1 azathioprine, 2 placebo) died by drowing, suicide, and ruptured abdominal aneurysm respectively ; 7 persons dropped out (3 azathioprine, 4 placebo); 3 persons (azathioprine) withdrew for causes unrelated to MS.
Drop‐outs/withdrawals: 25 (13 azathioprine, 12 placebo). People who dropped‐out were included in analysis.
Blindness: 47% of patients, 37% of neurologists (who performed neurological examinations and recorded the results at 3‐months intervals and when a relapse was suspected), and 90% of monitoring neurologists (who assessed patients for non‐MS problems including adverse effects and provided standard care) guessed the assigned treatment.
Supported by USPHS grants and University grants. Wellcome Company supplied AZA and appropriate placebo; Upjohn Company provided methylprednisolone and placebo.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Ghezzi 1989

Methods

Allocation: randomised‐ no further information.
Blindness: single.
Design: parallel group.
Intention to treat not done.
Duration: 18 months treatment/follow‐up.

Participants

RRMS N= 74 (40%); SPMS N= 111 (60%).
N= 185 (azathioprine 93; placebo 92).
N= 135 (73%) included in analysis (azathioprine 69; placebo 66).
Baseline characteristics available for 135 patients:
Sex: 88 females, 47 males.
Age at onset: mean 26 years (RRMS); mean 30 years (SPMS).
Disease duration: mean 5 years (RRMS); mean 7 years (SPMS).
EDSS: mean 2.1 (range 1‐5) (RRMS); mean 3.7 (range 1‐7) (SPMS).
Exclusion criteria: disease duration lower than 1 year and concomitant diseases controindicating immunosuppression.

Interventions

1. Azathioprine 2.5 mg/kg/daily.
2. No treatment.

Outcomes

Mean number of relapses in the two groups at 18 months.
Patients defined worsened in relation to the difference between final and initial Kurtzke EDSS score.

Notes

50 (27%) people were lost to 18 monhs follow‐up (24 azathioprine, 26 placebo); reasons ‐ 13 persons (azathioprine) had adverse effects and 1 person (unclear about the treatment status) had surgical operation. No other data available.
People who dropped‐out were not included in analysis.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Goodkin 1991

Methods

Allocation: randomised; random number tables used ‐ no further information.
Blindness: double.
Design: parallel group.
Intention to treat not done.
Duration: 2 years treatment/follow‐up.

Participants

Diagnosis: RRMS N= 59 (100%)
N= 54 (azathioprine 29; placebo 25).
N= 52 (96%) included in analysis (azathioprine 27; placebo 25).
Sex: 40 females,19 males.
Age at onset: mean 30 years.
Disease duration: mean 6 years.
EDSS: mean 3.2 (1.2) (azathioprine); mean 3.7 (1.6) (placebo).
Exclusion criteria: immunosuppressive therapy for 1 year prior to the study, total lymphoid irradiation at any time. Pregnancy, unwilling to practice birth control, systemic ilnesses, unable to give informed consent.
USA 1 centre.

Interventions

1. Azathioprine 3 mg/kg/daily
2. Placebo

Outcomes

Primary outcomes: mean relapse rate at 1 and 2 years.
Mean change in EDSS score at 2 years.
Secondary outcomes: time to first relapse, percentage of patients with at least one relapse at 1, 2 years, time to EDSS deterioration sustained for > 2 months, change in mean ambulation index score, time to deterioration of at least 1 point on ambulation index score > 2 months, time to deterioration of 20% or more in baseline nine‐hole‐peg test (9HPT) or in box‐and‐block test (BBT) for > 2 months, percentage of groups experiencing such deterioration in 9HPT or BBT, patient's subjective assessment of treatment, examining physician's assessment.
* EDSS deterioration: worseniing of 0.5 or more if EDSS at entry > 5; of 1 or more if baseline EDSS < 5.5.

Notes

7 (12%) people were lost to 2 years follow‐up (3 azathioprine, 4 placebo); reasons ‐ 4 persons (1 azathioprine, 3 placebo) denied entry; 1 person (placebo) developed severe relapse before entry; 1 person (azathioprine) refused follow‐up; and 1 person (azathioprine) was a protocol breach.
People who did not enter the study or who dropped‐out were not included in analysis.
Blinding: at the end of follow‐up, 56% of patients and 85% of the psysicians did not guess therapy.
Supported by National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Drugs supplied by Wellcome Company.
Recruitment period: 1983 to 1989.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Milanese 1993

Methods

Allocation: randomised‐ central randomisation, provided by Wellcome Italia, with random code numbers. Masking of allocation unclear.
Blindness: double.
Design: parallel group.
Intention to treat: performed.
Duration: 3 years treatment/follow‐up.

Participants

Diagnosis: RRMS N=19 (47.5%); SPMS N=10 (25%); PPMS N=11 (27.5%).
N= 40 (azathioprine 19; placebo 21).
N= 33 followed patients at 3 years (azahioprine 14; placebo 19). All included in survival analysis.
Sex: not reported
Mean age: at onset: azathioprine 29.5 years (6.5 SD); Placebo 29.6 (8.6 SD).
Mean disease duration: azathioprine 92.2 months ( 50.4 SD); placebo 87.8 (44.9 SD).
EDSS: mean 3.4 ( 1.7) (azathioprine); 3.1 ( 1.1) (placebo) .
Relapse rate: azathioprine 0.69 (0.77 SD); placebo 0.5 ( 0.58 SD).
Exclusion criteria: immunoprogressive treatment in the year preceding the study.
Italy 1 Centre.

Interventions

1. Azahioprine 2 mg/kg/die (no more than 2.5 mg/kg/die).
2. Placebo (lactose) in identical form ( 50 mg tablets).

Outcomes

Annual relapse rate.
Number of patients experiencing at least one relapse at 1, 2, and 3 years.
Mean change in EDSS at 1 and 2 and 3 years.
Number of patient remaining stable (no deterioration by 1 EDSS point or more if EDSS at entry was 5 or less or by 0.5 point or more if initial EDSS was >5).

Notes

7 (17.5%) people were lost to 3 years follow‐up (5 azathioprine, 2 placebo); reasons ‐ not reported.
Drop‐outs/withdrawals: 21 people (12 azathioprine, 9 placebo); reasons ‐ 5 persons (4 azathioprine, 1 placebo) had adverse events; 13 persons (7 azathioprine, 6 placebo) required the double‐blind regimen to be interruped but reasons were not reported; 2 persons(1 azahioprine, 1 placebo) had change of residence; and 1 person (placebo) due to wife's pregnancy.
People who dropped‐out were included in analysis.
AZA and placebo tablets in identical form were supplied by Wellcome Company.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

RRMS: relapsing remitting MS.
SPMS: secondary progressive MS;.
PPMS: primary progressive MS.
DSS = Kurtzke Disability Status Scale.
EDSS = Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale.

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Aimard 1983

Uncontrolled study.

Cendrowski 1971

Follow‐up period less than one year.

Fratiglioni 1988

Uncontrolled study.

Mertin 1980

Patients had been treated with a concurrent immunosoppressive treatment.

Mertin 1982

Patients had been treated with a concurrent immunosoppressive treatment.

Minderhoud 1988

54 patients who were incorporated in the British and Dutch 1988 trial were included in this review.

Patzold 1982

It was not possible to extract outcome data.

Rosen 1979

It was not possible to extract outcome data.

Silberberg 1973

Uncontrolled study.

Swinburn 1973

Non randomised study.

Zeeberg 1985

Available information was not sufficient to define the number of randomised patients, and the number of losses to follow up.

Zeeberg 1986

Available information was not sufficient to define the number of randomised patients, and the number of losses to follow up.

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Azathioprine versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Patients who had disability progression Show forest plot

4

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 1 Patients who had disability progression.

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 1 Patients who had disability progression.

1.1 at 1 year

1

37

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.72 [0.34, 8.75]

1.2 at 18 months

1

135

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.47, 1.85]

1.3 at 2 years

2

87

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.18, 1.10]

1.4 at 3 years

2

87

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.14, 0.81]

2 Patients who had disability progression (worst) Show forest plot

4

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 2 Patients who had disability progression (worst).

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 2 Patients who had disability progression (worst).

2.1 at 1 year

1

40

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.92 [0.47, 7.90]

2.2 at 18 months

1

185

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.50, 1.60]

2.3 at 2 years

2

92

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.30, 1.66]

2.4 at 3 years

2

105

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.18, 0.89]

3 Change in EDSS disability score Show forest plot

5

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 3 Change in EDSS disability score.

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 3 Change in EDSS disability score.

3.1 at 1 year

4

486

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.00 [‐0.17, 0.17]

3.2 at 18 months

1

135

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.08 [‐0.43, 0.27]

3.3 at 2 years

4

479

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.22 [‐0.44, 0.00]

3.4 at 3 years

3

419

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.25 [‐0.52, 0.02]

4 Patients with at least one relapse Show forest plot

5

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 4 Patients with at least one relapse.

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 4 Patients with at least one relapse.

4.1 at 1 year

4

499

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.44, 0.90]

4.2 at 18 months

1

135

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.26 [0.64, 2.50]

4.3 at 2 years

4

488

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.32, 0.69]

4.4 at 3 years

3

415

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.31, 0.75]

5 Patients with at least one relapse (worst) Show forest plot

5

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 5 Patients with at least one relapse (worst).

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 5 Patients with at least one relapse (worst).

5.1 at 1 year

4

513

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.47, 0.94]

5.2 at 18 months

1

185

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.62, 1.99]

5.3 at 2 years

4

513

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.35, 0.74]

5.4 at 3 years

3

459

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.33, 0.77]

6 Mean number of relapses Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 6 Mean number of relapses.

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 6 Mean number of relapses.

6.1 at 1 year

4

488

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.35, 0.05]

6.2 at 2 years

4

482

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.26 [‐0.43, ‐0.10]

6.3 at 3 years

3

417

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.29, 0.03]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Azathioprine versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Adverse effects Show forest plot

5

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 1 Adverse effects.

Comparison 2 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 1 Adverse effects.

1.1 Gastrointestinal

4

633

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.80 [1.93, 7.46]

1.2 Cutaneous rash

4

658

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.14 [0.96, 4.77]

1.3 Viral or bacterial infections

3

459

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.49 [0.64, 3.47]

1.4 Abnormal liver enzymes

3

593

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [2.10, 9.60]

1.5 Leucopenia (<3000 WBC/mm3)

4

513

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.58 [4.78, 15.39]

1.6 Anaemia

2

539

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.19 [1.49, 18.08]

1.7 Total malignancy (3 years)

2

419

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.93 [0.41, 21.00]

original image
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 1 Patients who had disability progression.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 1 Patients who had disability progression.

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 2 Patients who had disability progression (worst).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 2 Patients who had disability progression (worst).

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 3 Change in EDSS disability score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 3 Change in EDSS disability score.

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 4 Patients with at least one relapse.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 4 Patients with at least one relapse.

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 5 Patients with at least one relapse (worst).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 5 Patients with at least one relapse (worst).

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 6 Mean number of relapses.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 6 Mean number of relapses.

Comparison 2 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 1 Adverse effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Azathioprine versus placebo, Outcome 1 Adverse effects.

Comparison 1. Azathioprine versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Patients who had disability progression Show forest plot

4

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 at 1 year

1

37

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.72 [0.34, 8.75]

1.2 at 18 months

1

135

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.47, 1.85]

1.3 at 2 years

2

87

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.18, 1.10]

1.4 at 3 years

2

87

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.14, 0.81]

2 Patients who had disability progression (worst) Show forest plot

4

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 at 1 year

1

40

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.92 [0.47, 7.90]

2.2 at 18 months

1

185

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.50, 1.60]

2.3 at 2 years

2

92

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.30, 1.66]

2.4 at 3 years

2

105

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.18, 0.89]

3 Change in EDSS disability score Show forest plot

5

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 at 1 year

4

486

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.00 [‐0.17, 0.17]

3.2 at 18 months

1

135

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.08 [‐0.43, 0.27]

3.3 at 2 years

4

479

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.22 [‐0.44, 0.00]

3.4 at 3 years

3

419

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.25 [‐0.52, 0.02]

4 Patients with at least one relapse Show forest plot

5

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 at 1 year

4

499

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.44, 0.90]

4.2 at 18 months

1

135

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.26 [0.64, 2.50]

4.3 at 2 years

4

488

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.32, 0.69]

4.4 at 3 years

3

415

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.31, 0.75]

5 Patients with at least one relapse (worst) Show forest plot

5

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 at 1 year

4

513

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.47, 0.94]

5.2 at 18 months

1

185

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.62, 1.99]

5.3 at 2 years

4

513

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.35, 0.74]

5.4 at 3 years

3

459

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.33, 0.77]

6 Mean number of relapses Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 at 1 year

4

488

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.35, 0.05]

6.2 at 2 years

4

482

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.26 [‐0.43, ‐0.10]

6.3 at 3 years

3

417

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.29, 0.03]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Azathioprine versus placebo
Comparison 2. Azathioprine versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Adverse effects Show forest plot

5

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Gastrointestinal

4

633

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.80 [1.93, 7.46]

1.2 Cutaneous rash

4

658

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.14 [0.96, 4.77]

1.3 Viral or bacterial infections

3

459

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.49 [0.64, 3.47]

1.4 Abnormal liver enzymes

3

593

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [2.10, 9.60]

1.5 Leucopenia (<3000 WBC/mm3)

4

513

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.58 [4.78, 15.39]

1.6 Anaemia

2

539

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.19 [1.49, 18.08]

1.7 Total malignancy (3 years)

2

419

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.93 [0.41, 21.00]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Azathioprine versus placebo