Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

認知障害および認知症の発症に対する2型糖尿病の治療効果

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003804.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 15 junio 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Demencia y trastornos cognitivos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Almudena Areosa Sastre

    Correspondencia a: Geriatric Unit, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain

    [email protected]

  • Robin WM Vernooij

    Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Barcelona, Spain

  • Magali González‐Colaço Harmand

    UCICEC, University hospital of Canary Islands, La Laguna, Spain

  • Gabriel Martínez

    Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Barcelona, Spain

    Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile

    Servicio de Salud Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile

Contributions of authors

AAS: conceived the review, conducted trial selection, participated in completion of the report and writing the final draft.

MCH: conducted trial selection.

RV: coordinated the review process, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, analyses, GRADE assessment, 'Summary of findings' table construction, interpretation of results, participated in completion of the report and writing the final draft.

GM: coordinated the review process, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, analyses, GRADE assessment, 'Summary of findings' table construction, interpretation of results, participated in completion of the report and writing the final draft.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • NIHR, UK.

    This update was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), via a Cochrane Programme Grant to the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, National Health Service or the Department of Health

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Anna Noel‐Storr, Trials Search Co‐ordinator of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, for her assistance with the design of the search strategy.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 Jun 15

Effect of the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus on the development of cognitive impairment and dementia

Review

Almudena Areosa Sastre, Robin WM Vernooij, Magali González‐Colaço Harmand, Gabriel Martínez

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003804.pub2

2003 Jan 20

Effect of the treatment of Type II diabetes mellitus on the development of cognitive impairment and dementia

Review

John Grimley Evans, Almudena Areosa Sastre

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003804

Differences between protocol and review

  • We have updated the methods in the review since the original review in accordance with current Cochrane and Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group guidelines.

  • We included 'Summary of findings' tables and a methodological assessment of the quality of evidence with the GRADE methodology.

  • We separated blinding of participants and personnel from blinding of outcome assessment.

  • We added two new inclusion criteria: we included only trials that assessed a treatment for Type 2 diabetes that was approved by international guidelines; and we required a minimum intervention duration of 12 weeks.

  • We specified a method for selecting among multiple scales used in a study to measure the same cognitive domain.

  • The authors of the review have changed.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.