Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 24 febrero 2015

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 18 octubre 2006see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Vías respiratorias

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Yves Lacasse

    Correspondencia a: Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec(Hospital Laval), Québec,, Canada

    [email protected]

  • Roger Goldstein

    Division of Respiratory Medicine, West Park Hospital, Toronto, Canada

  • Toby J Lasserson

    Community Health Sciences, St George's, University of London, London, UK

  • Sylvie Martin

    Centre de recherche, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (Hôpital Laval), Québec,, Canada

Contributions of authors

YL and TJL designed the meta‐analysis.
YL, TJL and SM selected trials.
YL, TJL and SM extracted data.
YL and SM assessed the methodological quality of the trials.
SM was responsible for the data handling in Revman.
YL was involved in the clinical interpretation of the results.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Merck Frosst Canada, who were not otherwise involved in the design or conduct of this meta‐analysis, Canada.

  • Nederlands Astma Fonds, Netherlands.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the authors of the primary studies included in the meta‐analysis who kindly provided additional data and information regarding their previous work. We acknowledge the contribution of Eric Wong, Roger Goldstein and Gordon Guyatt who co‐authored the initial version of this review. We would also like to thank Elizabeth Arnold (CAG Information specialist) for conducting electronic literature searches and assistance with locating papers. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Nederlands Astma Fonds.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2015 Feb 24

Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Review

Bernard McCarthy, Dympna Casey, Declan Devane, Kathy Murphy, Edel Murphy, Yves Lacasse

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub3

2006 Oct 18

Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Review

Yves Lacasse, Roger Goldstein, Toby J Lasserson, Sylvie Martin

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub2

2001 Oct 23

Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Review

Yves Lacasse, Lucie Brosseau, S Milne, Sylvie Martin, Eric EW Wong, G H Guyatt, Roger Goldstein, John White

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003793

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.