Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.1 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Fatigue).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.1 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Fatigue).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.2 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Emotional function).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.2 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Emotional function).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.3 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Mastery).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.3 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Mastery).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.4 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Dyspnea).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.4 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Dyspnea).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.5 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Total).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.5 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Total).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.6 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Symptoms).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.6 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Symptoms).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.7 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Impacts).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 7

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.7 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Impacts).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.8 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Activity).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 8

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, outcome: 1.8 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Activity).

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 1 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Fatigue).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 1 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Fatigue).

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 2 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Emotional function).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 2 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Emotional function).

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 3 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Mastery).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 3 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Mastery).

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 4 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Dyspnea).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 4 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Dyspnea).

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 5 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Total).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 5 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Total).

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 6 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Symptoms).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 6 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Symptoms).

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 7 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Impacts).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 7 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Impacts).

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 8 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Activity).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 8 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Activity).

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 10 Functional exercise capacity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 10 Functional exercise capacity.

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 11 Maximal exercise capacity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Rehabilitation versus usual care, Outcome 11 Maximal exercise capacity.

Comparison 2 Sensitivity analysis of outcome by concealment of allocation and blinding of outcome assessment, Outcome 1 Maximal exercise capacity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Sensitivity analysis of outcome by concealment of allocation and blinding of outcome assessment, Outcome 1 Maximal exercise capacity.

Comparison 1. Rehabilitation versus usual care

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Fatigue) Show forest plot

11

618

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.71, 1.13]

2 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Emotional function) Show forest plot

11

618

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.52, 1.00]

3 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Mastery) Show forest plot

11

618

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.74, 1.20]

4 QoL ‐ Change in CRQ (Dyspnea) Show forest plot

11

610

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.85, 1.26]

5 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Total) Show forest plot

6

384

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐6.11 [‐8.98, ‐3.24]

6 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Symptoms) Show forest plot

6

384

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐4.68 [‐9.61, 0.25]

7 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Impacts) Show forest plot

6

384

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐6.27 [‐10.08, ‐2.47]

8 QoL ‐ Change in SGRQ (Activity) Show forest plot

6

384

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐4.78 [‐7.83, ‐1.72]

10 Functional exercise capacity Show forest plot

16

669

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

48.46 [31.64, 65.28]

11 Maximal exercise capacity Show forest plot

13

511

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

8.43 [3.45, 13.41]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Rehabilitation versus usual care
Comparison 2. Sensitivity analysis of outcome by concealment of allocation and blinding of outcome assessment

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maximal exercise capacity Show forest plot

7

335

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

5.89 [‐0.18, 11.96]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Sensitivity analysis of outcome by concealment of allocation and blinding of outcome assessment