Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgery for morbid obesity

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 19 octubre 2005see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Trastornos metabólicos y endocrinos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Jill L Colquitt

    Correspondencia a: Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

    [email protected]

  • Andrew J Clegg

    Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

  • Emma Loveman

    Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

  • Pamela Royle

    Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen, School of Medicine, Aberdeen, UK

  • Manpreet K Sidhu

    Fourth Hurdle Consulting Ltd, 10th Floor, Holborn Tower, London, UK

Contributions of authors

JILL COLQUITT: Protocol development, selection of studies, quality assessment, data extraction, data analysis, review development.

ANDREW CLEGG: Protocol development, selection of studies, quality assessment, data extraction, data analysis, review development.

PAMELA ROYLE: Searching for trials, quality assessment, data extraction.

MANPREET SIDHU: Selection of studies, data extraction.

EMMA LOVEMAN: Data extraction, quality assessment.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment, UK.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

This systematic review was commissioned by the NHS R&D Health Technology Programme on behalf of the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE). The views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS Executive.

The authors are grateful to the advisory panel who provided expert advice and comments for an earlier version of this systematic review (Clegg 2002):
Professor JN Baxter (Department of Surgery, Swansea), Professor B Campbell (Consultant General Surgeon, Exeter), Dr I Campbell (NOF Chairman, Nottingham), Sir A Cuschieri (Professor of Surgery, Dundee), Professor P James (Chairman, International Obesity Task Force, London), Professor R Jung (Consultant Physician, Chief Scientist to Scottish Executive, Dundee), Mr J D B Miller (Consultant Surgeon, Elgin), Dr AM Mir (University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff), Ms M O'Kane (Chief Dietician, Leeds), Mr P Sedman (Consultant Surgeon, Hull), Dr JPH Wilding (General (Internal) Medicine, Liverpool).

Also, we would like to thank the following people for information:
Ms L Hodson (Information Service, Wessex Institute for Health Research and Development), Dr A Avenell (Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen), Dr J Baird (Specialist Registrar in Public Health Medicine, Southampton).

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Aug 08

Surgery for weight loss in adults

Review

Jill L Colquitt, Karen Pickett, Emma Loveman, Geoff K Frampton

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4

2009 Apr 15

Surgery for obesity

Review

Jill L Colquitt, Joanna Picot, Emma Loveman, Andrew J Clegg

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub3

2005 Oct 19

Surgery for morbid obesity

Review

Jill L Colquitt, Andrew J Clegg, Emma Loveman, Pamela Royle, Manpreet K Sidhu

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub2

2003 Apr 22

Surgery for morbid obesity

Review

Jill Colquitt, Andrew Clegg, Manpreet K Sidhu, Pamela L Royle

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003641

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.