Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Erythropoietin for patients with malignant disease

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003407.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 19 octubre 2005see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Hematología

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2006 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Julia Bohlius

    Correspondencia a: University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

    [email protected]

  • Simon Langensiepen

    Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany

  • Guido Schwarzer

    Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

  • Jerome Seidenfeld

    Technology Evaluation Center, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Chicago, USA

  • Margret Piper

    Technology Evaluation Center, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Chicago, USA

  • C Bennet

    Other

  • Andreas Engert

    Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

  • Charles Bennett

    VA Chicago Health Care Systems, Other

Contributions of authors

JULIA BOHLIUS: Protocol development, searching for trials, eligibility and quality assessment, data extraction and analysis, drafting of final review

SIMON LANGENSIEPEN: Protocol development, searching, selection of studies, eligibility and quality assessment, data extraction and analysis, drafting of final review

GUIDO SCHWARZER: Statistical and methological advice, data analysis, content input

JEROME SEIDENFELD: Elegibility and quality assessment, data analysis, clinical and scientific advice, content input

MARGARET PIPER: Elegibility and quality assessment, data analysis, clinical and scientific advice, content input

CHARLES BENNETT: Clinical and scientific advice, content input

ANDREAS ENGERT: Clinical and scientific advice, content input

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Cologne, Germany.

  • Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group (CHMG), Germany.

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), USA.

  • German Cochrane Centre, Germany.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

Julia Bohlius was invited by Amgen to attend a symposium. Simon Langensiepen and Guido Schwarzer: potential conflict of interest not known. Jerome Seidenfeld and Margaret Piper are employed by a membership association of health plans. Charles Bennett received research grants and served as a consultant for Amgen (Thousand Oaks, CA), Ortho‐Biotech (Raritan, NJ), Roche and Johnson & Johnson. Andreas Engert received research grants for other projects from Amgen, OrthoBiotech and Roche and has served as a part‐time consultant for OrthoBiotech.

Acknowledgements

We thank all authors and co‐workers of primary studies, for which additional information and study data were provided: R. Abels, K. Aziz, J. Blohmer, D. Case, S. Casinu, M. Cazzola, C. Coiffier, F. Dammacco, L. Del Mastro, D. Henry, Italian Cooperative Study Group, C. Kurz, T. Littlewood, V. Moebus, C. Oberhoff, A. Österborg, E. Rose, W. Ten Bokkel, N. Thatcher, JA. Thompson, NA.Throuvalas, A. Varan. We thank the pharmaceutical companies for providing us with data for various studies (Roche) and admitted additionally insight into their clinical study reports (OrthoBiotech).

Special thanks to the CHMG editors, affiliated consumers and members of the CHMG editorial base for critical advice and strong support: Lia Alewijnse‐Poelman, Benjamin Djulbegovic, Céline Fournier, Axel Glasmacher, Alexander Greb, Gail Higgins, Sabine Kluge, Thilo Kober, Maryann Napoli, Lena Specht, Ralph Meyer, Sue Richards, Nicole Skoetz, Sven Trelle, Olaf Weingart, Keith Wheatley. Furthermore, we thank all participants of the CHMG consumer workshop, held in Cologne from 30.4 ‐ 1.5.2004, who provided constructive comments towards the improvement of the final manuscript.

The editorial base of the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group is funded, as part of the Competence Network Malignant Lymphomas, by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2012 Dec 12

Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer

Review

Thomy Tonia, Annette Mettler, Nadège Robert, Guido Schwarzer, Jerome Seidenfeld, Olaf Weingart, Chris Hyde, Andreas Engert, Julia Bohlius

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003407.pub5

2006 Jul 19

Erythropoietin or Darbepoetin for patients with cancer

Review

Julia Bohlius, Jayne Wilson, Jerome Seidenfeld, Margret Piper, Guido Schwarzer, Josie Sandercock, Sven Trelle, Olaf Weingart, Susan Bayliss, Susan Brunskill, Benjamin Djulbegovic, Charles Bennett, Simon Langensiepen, Chris Hyde, Andreas Engert

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003407.pub4

2005 Oct 19

Erythropoietin for patients with malignant disease

Review

Julia Bohlius, Simon Langensiepen, Guido Schwarzer, Jerome Seidenfeld, Margret Piper, C Bennet, Andreas Engert, Charles Bennett

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003407.pub3

2004 Jul 19

Erythropoietin for patients with malignant disease

Review

Julia JB Bohlius, Simon Langensiepen, Guido Schwarzer, J Seidenfeld, Margret Piper, C Bennet, Andreas Engert, Charles Bennett

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003407.pub2

2002 Apr 22

Erythropoietin for patients with malignant disease

Protocol

Simon SL Langensiepen, Julia Bohlius, Jerome Seidenfeld, Margret Piper, C Bennett, Guido Schwarzer, Andreas Engert, Charles Bennet

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003407

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.