Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oxitocina intravenosa sola para la maduración cervical y la inducción del trabajo de parto

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003246.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 octubre 2009see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Zarko Alfirevic

    Correspondencia a: School of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Division of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    [email protected]

  • Anthony J Kelly

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK

  • Therese Dowswell

    Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, School of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Division of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Contributions of authors

This update builds on a previous Cochrane review by AJ Kelly and B Tan. In this update, Z Alfirevic carried out data extraction, suggested analyses, drafted text and commented on drafts. T Dowswell carried out data extraction, data entry, data checks, analysis and drafted text. AJ Kelly commented on drafts.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK.

  • The University of Liverpool, UK.

External sources

  • National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), UK.

    The update of this review was supported by the NIHR NHS Cochrane Collaboration Programme grant scheme award for NHS‐prioritised centrally‐managed, pregnancy and childbirth systematic reviews. CPGS02

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Andrew MacDonald for help with translation of Dominguez 1999 and Maria Tenorio for help with translation of Morgan‐Ortiz 2002.

As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by four peers (an editor and three referees who are external to the editorial team) and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2009 Oct 07

Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour

Review

Zarko Alfirevic, Anthony J Kelly, Therese Dowswell

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003246.pub2

2009 Jul 08

Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour

Review

Anthony J Kelly, Brenda P Tan

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003246

Differences between protocol and review

In this updated review the methods section has been updated, new trials have been added, the analysis has been simplified and we have responded to feedback on the original review. We have added sensitivity analyses and described the findings from subgroup analyses in the text.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.