Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Maniobra de Epley (cambio de posición canalicular) para el vértigo posicional paroxístico benigno

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003162.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 diciembre 2014see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Enfermedades de oído, nariz y garganta

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Malcolm P Hilton

    Correspondencia a: ENT Department, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK

    [email protected]

  • Darren K Pinder

    Department of Otolaryngology, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK

Contributions of authors

The two authors contributed equally to searching, selection of trials, 'Risk of bias' assessment and data extraction.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • None, Other.

External sources

  • None, Other.

Declarations of interest

Malcolm Hilton: none known.
Darren Pinder: none known.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Dec 08

The Epley (canalith repositioning) manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Review

Malcolm P Hilton, Darren K Pinder

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003162.pub3

2004 Apr 19

The Epley (canalith repositioning) manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Review

Malcolm P Hilton, Darren K Pinder

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003162.pub2

2001 Oct 25

The Epley (canalith repositioning) manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Review

Malcolm P Hilton, Darren K Pinder

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003162

Differences between protocol and review

The original protocol included the Epley manoeuvre (either as classically described or with mastoid oscillation). Mastoid oscillation and other adjunctive treatments are now the subject of a separate review (Hunt 2012). The change in protocol does not alter the inclusion of any trials up to and including the 2014 update.

No trials reported change in vertigo on the basis of frequency and/or severity as specified as original outcome measures. Vertigo was presented as a symptom that was either 'present' or 'absent'. We therefore changed the primary outcome measure to 'complete resolution of symptoms' at the 2014 update.

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Epley versus control or placebo manoeuvre, Outcome 1 Complete resolution of vertigo symptoms (subjective report).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Epley versus control or placebo manoeuvre, Outcome 1 Complete resolution of vertigo symptoms (subjective report).

Comparison 1 Epley versus control or placebo manoeuvre, Outcome 2 Conversion of a positive to a negative Dix‐Hallpike test.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Epley versus control or placebo manoeuvre, Outcome 2 Conversion of a positive to a negative Dix‐Hallpike test.

Comparison 2 Epley versus Brandt‐Daroff exercises, Outcome 1 Resolution of symptoms and nystagmus on Dix‐Hallpike test.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Epley versus Brandt‐Daroff exercises, Outcome 1 Resolution of symptoms and nystagmus on Dix‐Hallpike test.

Comparison 3 Epley versus Semont manoeuvre, Outcome 1 Resolution of nystagmus on provocation testing, at 7 days.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Epley versus Semont manoeuvre, Outcome 1 Resolution of nystagmus on provocation testing, at 7 days.

Comparison 4 Epley versus hybrid (Gans) manoeuvre, Outcome 1 Resolution of nystagmus on provocation testing, at 7 days.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Epley versus hybrid (Gans) manoeuvre, Outcome 1 Resolution of nystagmus on provocation testing, at 7 days.

Comparison 1. Epley versus control or placebo manoeuvre

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete resolution of vertigo symptoms (subjective report) Show forest plot

5

273

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.42 [2.62, 7.44]

2 Conversion of a positive to a negative Dix‐Hallpike test Show forest plot

8

507

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.00, 15.42]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Epley versus control or placebo manoeuvre
Comparison 2. Epley versus Brandt‐Daroff exercises

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Resolution of symptoms and nystagmus on Dix‐Hallpike test Show forest plot

1

81

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

12.38 [4.32, 35.47]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Epley versus Brandt‐Daroff exercises
Comparison 3. Epley versus Semont manoeuvre

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Resolution of nystagmus on provocation testing, at 7 days Show forest plot

2

117

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.32, 1.88]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Epley versus Semont manoeuvre
Comparison 4. Epley versus hybrid (Gans) manoeuvre

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Resolution of nystagmus on provocation testing, at 7 days Show forest plot

1

58

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.18, 2.52]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Epley versus hybrid (Gans) manoeuvre