Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Contenido relacionado

Ir a:

Revisiones y protocolos relacionados

Topics

Temas

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 1 Epley versus control or placebo manoeuvre, Outcome 1 Complete resolution of vertigo symptoms (subjective report).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Epley versus control or placebo manoeuvre, Outcome 1 Complete resolution of vertigo symptoms (subjective report).

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 1 Epley versus control or placebo manoeuvre, Outcome 2 Conversion of a positive to a negative Dix‐Hallpike test.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Epley versus control or placebo manoeuvre, Outcome 2 Conversion of a positive to a negative Dix‐Hallpike test.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 2 Epley versus Brandt‐Daroff exercises, Outcome 1 Resolution of symptoms and nystagmus on Dix‐Hallpike test.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Epley versus Brandt‐Daroff exercises, Outcome 1 Resolution of symptoms and nystagmus on Dix‐Hallpike test.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 3 Epley versus Semont manoeuvre, Outcome 1 Resolution of nystagmus on provocation testing, at 7 days.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Epley versus Semont manoeuvre, Outcome 1 Resolution of nystagmus on provocation testing, at 7 days.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 4 Epley versus hybrid (Gans) manoeuvre, Outcome 1 Resolution of nystagmus on provocation testing, at 7 days.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Epley versus hybrid (Gans) manoeuvre, Outcome 1 Resolution of nystagmus on provocation testing, at 7 days.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva
Comparison 1. Epley versus control or placebo manoeuvre

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Complete resolution of vertigo symptoms (subjective report) Show forest plot

5

273

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.42 [2.62, 7.44]

2 Conversion of a positive to a negative Dix‐Hallpike test Show forest plot

8

507

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.00, 15.42]
Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Epley versus control or placebo manoeuvre
Ir a la tabla de la revisión
Comparison 2. Epley versus Brandt‐Daroff exercises

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Resolution of symptoms and nystagmus on Dix‐Hallpike test Show forest plot

1

81

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

12.38 [4.32, 35.47]
Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Epley versus Brandt‐Daroff exercises
Ir a la tabla de la revisión
Comparison 3. Epley versus Semont manoeuvre

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Resolution of nystagmus on provocation testing, at 7 days Show forest plot

2

117

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.32, 1.88]
Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Epley versus Semont manoeuvre
Ir a la tabla de la revisión
Comparison 4. Epley versus hybrid (Gans) manoeuvre

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Resolution of nystagmus on provocation testing, at 7 days Show forest plot

1

58

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.18, 2.52]
Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Epley versus hybrid (Gans) manoeuvre
Ir a la tabla de la revisión