Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Transfusi darah sebagai langkah pencegahan strok primer dan sekunder di kalangan pengidap anaemia sel sabit

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

SIT 2014 {published data only}

Bean CJ, Boulet SL, Ellingsen D, Pyle ME, Barron‐Casella EA, Casella JF, et al. Heme oxygenase‐1 gene promoter polymorphism is associated with reduced incidence of acute chest syndrome among children with sickle cell disease. Blood 2012;120(18):3822‐8. [CENTRAL: 899251; CRS: 5500050000000004; EMBASE: 2012654658]CENTRAL
Beverung LM, Strouse JJ, Hulbert ML, Neville K, Liem RI, Inusa B, et al. Health‐related quality of life in children with sickle cellanemia: Impact of blood transfusion therapy. American Journal of Hematology 2015;90:139‐43. CENTRAL
Bhatnagar P, Purvis S, Barron‐Casella E, DeBaun MR, Casella JF, Arking DE, et al. Genome‐wide association study identifies genetic variants influencing F‐cell levels in sickle cell patients. Journal of Human Genetics 2011;56(4):316‐23. CENTRAL
Bhatnagar P, Purvis S, Barron‐Casella E, DeBaun MR, Casella JF, Arking DE, et al. Genome‐wide association study identifies genetic variants influencing F‐cell levels in sickle‐cell patients. Journal of Human Genetics 2011;56(4):316‐23. Supplementary information. www.nature.com/jhg/journal/v56/n4/suppinfo/jhg201112s1.html?url=/jhg/journal/v56/n4/full/jhg201112a.html. CENTRAL
Casella JF, King AA, Barton B, White DA, Noetzel MJ, Ichord RN, et al. Design of the silent cerebral infarct transfusion (SIT) trial. Pediatric Hematology and Oncology 2010;27(2):69‐89. CENTRAL
DeBaun M. Epidemiology and treatment of silent strokes in sickle cell anemia. 28th Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program; 2005 Apr 9‐13; Cincinnati, Ohio. 2005:Plenary. CENTRAL
DeBaun MR, Gordon M, McKinstry RC, Noetzel MJ, White DA, Sarnaik SA, et al. Controlled trial of transfusions for silent cerebral infarcts in sickle cell anemia. New England Journal of Medicine 2014;371:399‐10. [NCT00072761: Silent Cerebral Infarct Transfusion Multi‐Center Clinical Trial (SIT)]CENTRAL
DeBaun MR, Sarnaik SA, Rodeghier MJ, Minniti CP, Howard TH, Iyer RV, et al. Associated risk factors for silent cerebral infarcts in sickle cell anemia: low baseline hemoglobin, sex, and relative high systolic blood pressure. Blood 2012;119(16):3684‐90. CENTRAL
ISRCTN52713285. Silent cerebral infarct multi‐center clinical trial. www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN52713285 (accessed 1 April 2016). CENTRAL
Jordan LC, McKinstry RC, Kraut MA, Ball WS, Vendt BA, Casella JF, et al. Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging of children with sickle cell disease. Pediatrics 2010;126(1):53‐61. CENTRAL
NCT00072761. Silent cerebral infarct transfusion multi‐center clinical trial (SIT). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00072761 (accessed 1 April 2016). CENTRAL
Quinn CT, McKinstry RC, Dowling MM, Ball WS, Kraut MA, Casella JF, et al. Acute silent cerebral ischemia occurs more frequently than silent cerebral infarction in children with sickle cell anemia. Blood 2010;116(21):268. CENTRAL
Vendt BA, McKinstry RC, Ball WS, Kraut MA, Prior FW, Barton B, et al. Silent Cerebral Infarct Transfusion (SIT) trial imaging core: application of novel imaging information technology for rapid and central review of MRI of the brain. Journal of Digital Imaging 2009;22(3):326‐43. CENTRAL

STOP 1998 {published data only}

Abboud M, Cure J, Gallagher D, Berman B, Hsu L, Wang W, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in children with abnormal transcranial doppler (TCD) velocities in the STOP study. Blood 1999;94(10 Suppl 1):645a. CENTRAL
Abboud MR, Cure J, Gallagher D, Berman B, Hsu L, Wang W, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in children with abnormal TCD in the STOP study. 23rd Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program. 1999:49. CENTRAL
Abboud MR, Cure J, Granger S, Gallagher D, Hsu L, Wang W, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in children with sickle cell disease and abnormal transcranial Doppler ultrasonography findings enrolled in the STOP study. Blood 2004;103(7):2822‐6. CENTRAL
Adamkiewicz T, Abboud M, Barredo J, Cavalier ME, Peterson J, Rackoff B, et al. Serum Ferritin in children with SCD on chronic transfusion: correlation with serum alanine aminotransferase and liver iron (STOP/STOP II liver iron ancillary study). 35th Annivesary Convention of the National Sickle Celll Disease Program and the Sickle Cell Disease Association of America; 2007 Sep 17‐22; Washington DC, USA. 2007:316. CENTRAL
Adamkiewicz T, Abboud MR, Barredo JC, Kirby‐Allen M, Alvarez OA, Casella JF, et al. Serum ferritin in children with sickle cell disease on chronic transfusion: measure of iron overload or end organ injury? STOP/ STOP II liver iron ancillary study. Blood. 2006; Vol. 108, issue 11. [Abstract no: 791]CENTRAL
Adamkiewicz TV, Abboud MR, Paley C, Olivieri N, Kirby‐Allen M, Vichinsky E, et al. Serum ferritin level changes in children with sickle cell disease on chronic blood transfusion are nonlinear and are associated with iron load and liver injury. Blood 2009;114(21):4632‐8. CENTRAL
Adams RJ. Lessons from the stroke prevention trial in sickle cell anemia (STOP) study. Journal of Child Neurology 2000;15(5):344‐9. [NCT00000592: Stroke Prevention in Sickle Cell Anemia (STOP 1)]CENTRAL
Adams RJ, Brambilla DJ. Stroke prevention trial in sickle cell anemia: STOP. 21st Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program. 1996:19. CENTRAL
Adams RJ, Brambilla DJ, Granger S, Gallagher D, Vichinsky E, Abboud MR, et al. Stroke and conversion to high risk in children screened with transcranial Doppler ultrasound during the STOP study. Blood 2004;103(10):3689‐94. CENTRAL
Adams RJ, Brambilla DJ, McKie V, Files B, Vichinsky E, Abboud M, et al. Risk of stroke in children with sickle cell disease and abnormal transcranial doppler ultrasound (TCD). Blood 1999;94(10 Suppl 1):419a. CENTRAL
Adams RJ, Brambilla DJ, McKie V, Files B, Vichinsky E, Abboud M, et al. Stroke prevention in sickle cell disease (STOP): Baseline characteristics of trial patients. 22nd Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program. 1997:41. CENTRAL
Adams RJ, Brambilla DJ, McKie V, Files B, Vichinsky E, Abboud M, et al. Stroke prevention in sickle cell disease (STOP): final results. 25th Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program. 2001. [Abstract no: #8]CENTRAL
Adams RJ, Brambilla DJ, McKie V, Files B, Vichinsky E, Abboud M, et al. Stroke prevention in sickle cell disease (STOP): final results. Blood 2000;96(11 Pt 1):10a. CENTRAL
Adams RJ, Brambilla DJ, McKie V, Files B, Vichinsky E, Abboud M, et al. Stroke prevention in sickle cell disease (STOP): follow‐up after closure of the trial. Blood 1998;92(10 Suppl 1):527a. CENTRAL
Adams RJ, Brambilla DJ, McKie VC, Files B, Vichinsky E, Abboud M, et al. Stroke prevention in sickle cell disease (STOP): baseline characteristics of trial patients. Blood 1997;90(10 Suppl 1):123a. CENTRAL
Adams RJ, Brambilla DJ, Vichinsky E, Abboud M, Pegelow C, Carl EM, et al. Risk of stroke and conversion to abnormal TCD in children screened with transcranial doppler (TCD) during the STOP study. National Sickle Cell Disease Program 30th Annual Meeting; 2002 Sept 17‐21. 2002:3. CENTRAL
Adams RJ, Brambilla DJ, Vichinsky E, Abboud M, Pegelow C, Carl EM, et al. Stroke prevention trial in sickle cell anemia (STOP study): Risk of stroke in 1933 children screened with transcranial doppler (TCD). 23rd Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program. 1999:54. CENTRAL
Adams RJ, Carl EM, McKie VC, Odo NA, Kutlar A, Phillips M, et al. A pilot trial of hydroxyurea to prevent strokes in children with sickle cell anemia. 23rd Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program. 1999:53. CENTRAL
Adams RJ, McKie V, Files B, Vichinsky E, Abboud M, Hsu L, et al. Stroke prevention in sickle cell disease (STOP): Results of transcranial doppler ultrasound screening stroke risk. Stroke 1998;29(1):308. CENTRAL
Adams RJ, McKie VC, Brambilla DJ, Carl E, Gallagher D, Nichols FT, et al. Stroke prevention trial in sickle cell anemia. Controlled Clinical Trials 1998;19(1):110‐29. CENTRAL
Adams RJ, McKie VC, Hsu L, Files B, Vichinsky E, Pegelow C, et al. Prevention of a first stroke by transfusions in children with sickle cell anemia and abnormal results on transcranial doppler ultrasonography. New England Journal of Medicine 1998;339(1):5‐11. [NCT00000592: Stroke Prevention in Sickle Cell Anemia (STOP 1)]CENTRAL
Anonymous. Transfusion to prevent first stroke in children with sickle cell anemia. Journal of the American Ostoepathic Association 1998;98(7):363‐4. CENTRAL
Bulas DI, Jones A, Seibert JJ, Driscoll C, O'Donnell R, Adams RJ. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) screening for stroke prevention in sickle cell anemia: pitfalls in technique variation. Pediatric Radiology 2000;30(11):733‐8. CENTRAL
Cohen AR. Sickle cell disease ‐ new treatments, new questions. New England Journal of Medicine 1998;339(1):42‐4. CENTRAL
Duncan GW. Ischemic stroke in sickle cell disease: a review. Tennessee Medicine 1997;90(12):498‐9. CENTRAL
Files B, Brambilla D, Kutlar A, Miller S, Pegelow C, Vichinsky E, et al. A randomized trial of chronic transfusion to prevent stroke in sickle cell anemia: changes in ferritin with chronic transfusion. Blood 1998;92(10 Suppl 1):528a. CENTRAL
Files B, Brambilla D, Kutlar A, Miller S, Vichinsky E, Wang W, et al. Longitudinal changes in ferritin during chronic transfusion: a report from the Stroke Prevention Trial in Sickle Cell Anemia (STOP). Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology 2002;24(4):284‐90. CENTRAL
Gates A, Rogers MA, Puczynski M. Stroke prevention trial in sickle cell anemia: comments on effects of chronic transfusion on pain. Journal of Pediatrics 2002;141(5):742‐3. CENTRAL
Hsu LL, Miller ST, Wright E, Kutlar A, McKie V, Wang W, et al. Alpha thalassemia is associated with decreased risk of abnormal transcranial doppler ultrasonography in children with sickle cell anemia. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology 2003;25(8):622‐8. CENTRAL
Hyacinth HI, Gee BE, Voeks JH, Adams RJ, Hibbert J. High frequency of RBC transfusions in the STOP study was associated with reduction in serum biomarkers of neurodegeneration, vascular remodeling and inflammation. Blood. 2012; Vol. 120, issue 21. [Abstract no: 244; CENTRAL: 999896; CRS: 5500127000000021]CENTRAL
Kutlar A, Brambilla D, Clair B, Haghighat A, Bakanay S, Adams G, et al. Candidate gene polymorphisms and their association with TCD velocities in children with sickle cell disease. Blood. 2007; Vol. 110, issue 11. [Abstract no: 429]CENTRAL
Kutlar A, Harbin J, Jackson B, Holley L, Gallagher D, Clair B, et al. Laboratory parameters in patients randomized in the STOP study and their modification by transfusion. Blood 2000;96(11 Pt 2):18b‐9b. CENTRAL
Kutlar A, Harbin J, Jackson BB, Holley LGD, Clair B, Brambilla D, et al. Baseline laboratory parameters in patients randomized to the STOP study and their modification by transfusion. 24th Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program. 2000:82a. CENTRAL
Kwiatkowski JL, Brambilla DJ, Granger S, Adams RJ. Elevated blood flow velocity in the anterior cerebral artery and stroke risk in sickle cell disease. Blood. 2003; Vol. 102, issue 11. [Abstract no: 408]CENTRAL
Kwiatkowski JL, Granger S, Brambilla DJ, Brown RC, Miller ST, Adams RJ. Elevated blood flow velocity in the anterior cerebral artery and stroke risk in sickle cell disease: extended analysis from the STOP trial. British Journal of Haematology 2006;134(3):333‐9. CENTRAL
Kwiatkowski JL, Morales K, Brambilla DJ, Files B, Adamkiewicz T, Adams RJ. Long‐term follow‐up of transcranial doppler ultrasonography in children with sickle cell disease: Results of the STOP and STOP II patient cohorts. Blood 2002;100(11 Pt 1):663a. CENTRAL
Lee MT, Piomelli S, Granger S, Miller ST, Harkness S, Brambilla DJ, et al. Stroke Prevention Trial in Sickle Cell Anemia (STOP): extended follow‐up and final results. Blood 2006;108(3):847‐52. CENTRAL
Lee SB, Ramsingh D, Kutlar A, Holley L, McVie VC, Adams RJ. C‐reactive protein in children with sickle cell disease at risk for stroke in the STOP study. Stroke 2002;33(1):373. CENTRAL
Lezcano NE, Odo N, Kutlar A, Brambilla D, Adams RJ. Regular transfusion lowers plasma free hemoglobin in children with sickle‐cell disease at risk for stroke. Stroke 2006;37(6):1424‐6. CENTRAL
Miller ST, Wright E, Abboud M, Berman B, Files B, Scher C, et al. Impact of chronic transfusion on non‐neurological events during the Stroke Prevention Trial in sickle cell anemia (STOP). Pediatric Research 2000;47(4 Pt 2):251A. CENTRAL
Miller ST, Wright E, Abboud M, Berman B, Files B, Scher C, et al. Impact of chronic transfusion on non‐neurological events during the stroke prevention trial in sickle cell anemia (TOP). 24th Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program. 2000:61a. CENTRAL
Miller ST, Wright E, Abboud M, Berman B, Files B, Scher CD, et al. Impact of chronic transfusion on incidence of pain and acute chest syndrome during the Stroke Prevention Trial (STOP) in sickle‐cell anemia. Journal of Pediatrics 2001;139(6):785‐9. CENTRAL
Nichols FT, Jones AM, Adams RJ. Stroke prevention in sickle cell disease (STOP) study guidelines for transcranial Doppler testing. Journal of Neuroimaging 2001;11(4):354‐62. CENTRAL
Olivieri N, Brambilla D, McKie V, Piomelli S, Kutlar A, Files B, et al. Changes in cerebral blood flow velocities during chronic transfusion therapy to prevent stroke in sickle cell disease. Blood 2000;96(11 Pt 1):486a. CENTRAL
Pegelow CH, Adams R, Hsu L, McKie V, Wang W, Zimmerman R, et al. Children with silent infarct and elevated transcranial doppler ultrasonography velocity are at increased risk of subsequent infarctive events. 23rd Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program. 1999:137. CENTRAL
Pegelow CH, Wang W, Granger S, Hsu LL, Vichinsky E, Moser FG, et al. Silent infarcts in children with sickle cell anemia and abnormal cerebral artery velocity. Archives of Neurology 2001;58(12):2017‐21. CENTRAL
Sayer G, Bowman L, Clair B, Cail A, Blanchard B, Natrajan K, et al. Long term outcome of patients enrolled into STOP and STOP II trials: a single center experience. Blood. 2012; Vol. 120, issue 21. [Abstract no: 3219; CENTRAL: 999895; CRS: 5500127000000020]CENTRAL
Styles L, De Jong K, Vichinsky E, Lubin B, Adams R, Kuypers F. Increased RBC phosphatidylserine exposure in sickle cell disease patients at risk for stroke by transcranial Doppler screening. Blood 1997;90(10 Suppl 1):604a‐5a. CENTRAL
Vichinsky E, Luban E, Wright E, Olivieri N, Driscoll C, Pegelow C, et al. Prospective red cell phenotype matching in STOP ‐ a multi‐centre transfusion trial. 23rd Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program. 1999:163. CENTRAL
Vichinsky E, Luban N, Wright E, Olivieri N, Driscoll C, Pegelow C, et al. Prospective red cell phenotype matching in STOP ‐ a multi‐center transfusion trial. Blood 1998;92(10 Suppl 1):528a. CENTRAL
Vichinsky EP, Luban NL, Wright E, Olivieri N, Driscoll C, Pegelow CH, et al. Prospective RBC phenotype matching in a stroke‐prevention trial in sickle cell anemia: a multicenter transfusion trial. Transfusion 2001;41(9):1086‐92. CENTRAL
Wang W, Morales K, Olivieri N, Styles L, Scher C, Adams R, et al. Effect of chronic transfusion on growth in children with sickle cell anemia: results of the STOP trial. National Sickle Cell Disease Program 30th Annual Meeting Conference; 2002 Sept 17‐21. 2002:100. CENTRAL
Wang WC, Morales KH, Scher CD, Styles L, Olivieri N, Adams R, et al. Effect of long‐term transfusion on growth in children with sickle cell anemia: results of the STOP trial. Journal of Pediatrics 2005;147(2):244‐7. CENTRAL

STOP 2 2005 {published and unpublished data}

ASH News Daily 2004. NHLBI stops the STOP II trial early. www.hematology.org/publications/newsdaily/2004/issue_3/NHLBI.cfm (accessed 22 November 2005). CENTRAL
Abboud MR, Yim E, Adams RJ. The progression and development of silent infarcts in children with sickle cell anemia is prevented by chronic transfusions and is unrelated to level of hemolysis. Blood. 2008; Vol. 12. [Abstract no: 712]CENTRAL
Abboud MR, Yim E, Musallam KM, Adams, RJ. Discontinuing prophylactic transfusions increases the risk of silent brain infarction in children with sickle cell disease: data from STOP II. Blood 2011;118(4):894‐98. CENTRAL
Adamkiewicz T. Transcranial doppler measures in patients with sickle cell disease at high risk for stroke and receiving hydroxyurea: the HyRetro ancillary study. 52nd ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; 2010 Dec 4‐7; Orlando, Florida. 2010. [Abstract no: 1620]CENTRAL
Adamkiewicz T, Abboud M, Barredo J, Cavalier ME, Peterson J, Rackoff B, et al. Serum Ferritin in children with SCD on chronic transfusion: correlation with serum alanine aminotransferase and liver iron (STOP/STOP II liver iron ancillary study). 35th Anniversary Convention of the National Sickle Celll Disesae Program and the Sickle Cell Disease Association of America; 2007 Sep 17‐22; Washington DC, USA. 2007:316. CENTRAL
Adamkiewicz T, Abboud MR, Barredo JC, Kirby‐Allen M, Alvarez OA, Casella JF, et al. Serum ferritin in children with sickle cell disease on chronic transfusion: measure of iron overload or end organ injury? STOP/ STOP II liver iron ancillary study. Blood. 2006; Vol. 108, issue 11. [Abstract no: 791]CENTRAL
Adamkiewicz TV, Abboud MR, Paley C, Olivieri N, Kirby‐Allen M, Vichinsky E, et al. Serum ferritin level changes in children with sickle cell disease on chronic blood transfusion are nonlinear and are associated with iron load and liver injury. Blood 2009;114(21):4632‐8. CENTRAL
Adams RJ, Brambilla D. Discontinuing prophylactic transfusions used to prevent stroke in sickle cell disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2005;353(26):2769‐78. [NCT00006182: Stroke Prevention in Sickle Cell Anemia (STOP 2)]CENTRAL
Adams RJ, Brambilla D, Miller ST. Optimizing primary stroke prevention in children with sickle cell. 28th Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program; 2005 April 9‐13; Cincinnati, Ohio. 2005:3. CENTRAL
Adams RJ, Brambilla DJ, STOP II investigators. The study design of optimizing primary stroke prevention in children with sickle cell anemia. 27th Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program; 2004 April 18‐21; Los Angeles, California. 2004:174. CENTRAL
Alvarez O, Miller S, Berman B, Brown C, Casella J, Coates T, et al. Evaluation of chronic transfusion practices in children with sickle cell disease: a survey of STOP II investigators. Blood 2004;104(11):Abstract no: 3732. [Abstract no: 3732]CENTRAL
Brambilla DJ, Adams RJ. Stroke prevention in sickle cell anemia (STOP 2). National Institutes of Health, Clinical Trials Database Started in 06/2000. CENTRAL
Brown C, Miller S, Kwiatkowski J, Brambilla D, Adams R. Optimizing primary stroke prevention in sickle cell anemia (STOP 2): an argument for prolonged transfusion?. 29th Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program; 2006 April 8‐12; Memphis, USA.. 2006:78. CENTRAL
Kutlar A, Brambilla D, Clair B, Haghighat A, Bakanay S, Adams G, et al. Candidate gene polymorphisms and their association with TCD velocities in children with sickle cell disease. Blood 2007;110(11):Abstract no: 429. [Abstract no: 429]CENTRAL
Kwiatkowski JL, Morales K, Brambilla DJ, Files B, Adamkiewicz T, Adams RJ, et al. Long‐term follow‐up of transcranial doppler ultrasonography in children with sickle cell disease: results of the STOP and STOP II patient cohorts. Blood 2002;100(11 Pt 1):663a. CENTRAL
Medical College of Georgia. STOP II Questions and Answers. www.mcg.edu/neurology/Research/sicklecell/STOPIIQandA.htm (accessed 22 November 2005). CENTRAL
Medical News Today. NHLBI stops sickle cell anemia transfusion study. www.medicalnewstoday.com/printerfriendlynews.php?newsid=17363 (accessed 22 November 2005). CENTRAL
Sayer G, Bowman L, Clair B, Cail A, Blanchard B, Natrajan K, et al. Long term outcome of patients enrolled into STOP and STOP II trials: a single center experience. Blood. 2012; Vol. 120, issue 21. [Abstract no: 3219; CENTRAL: 999895; CRS: 5500127000000020]CENTRAL

SWiTCH 2012 {published data only}

Alvarez O, Yovetich NA, Scott JP, Owen W, Miller ST, Schultz W, et al. Pain and other non‐neurological adverse events in children with sickle cell anemia and previous stroke who received hydroxyurea and phlebotomy or chronic transfusions and chelation: results from the SWiTCH clinical trial. American Journal of Hematology 2013;88(11):932‐8. [CENTRAL: 963136; CRS: 5500125000000520; PUBMED: 23861242]CENTRAL
Aygun B, Mortier NA, Kesler K, Schultz WH, Alvarez OA, Rogers ZR, et al. Therapeutice phlebotomy in children with sickle cell anemia, stroke, and iron overload: the SWiTCH experience. 53rd ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; 2011 Dec 10‐13; San Diego, California. 2011. [Abstract no: 1044]CENTRAL
Helton KJ, Adam RJ, Kesler KL, Lockhart A, Aygun B, Driscoll C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/angiography and transcranial Doppler velocities in sickle cell anemia: results from the SWiTCH trial. Blood 2014;124(6):891‐898. CENTRAL
Kwiatkowski JL, Cohen AR, Garro J, Alvarez O, Nagasubramanian R, Sarnaik S, et al. Transfusional iron overload in children with sickle cell anemia on chronic transfusion therapy for secondary stroke prevention. American Journal of Hematology 2012;87(2):221‐3. [CENTRAL: 864015; CRS: 5500100000011226; PUBMED: 22120913]CENTRAL
NCT00122980. Stroke with transfusions changing to hydroxyurea (SWiTCH). www.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00122980 (accessed 16th August 2011). CENTRAL
Sheehan VA, Howard TA, Sabo A, Nagasaswamy U, Crosby JR, Davis B, et al. Genetic predictors of hemoglobin F response to hydroxyurea in sickle cell anemia. Blood. 2012; Vol. 120, issue 21. [Abstract no: 241; CENTRAL: 977454; CRS: 5500125000000531]CENTRAL
Ware RE, Helms RW. Stroke with transfusions changing to hydroxyurea (SWiTCH): a phase 3 randomised clinical trial for treatment of children with sickle cell anemia. 52nd ASH Meeting and Exposition; 2010 Dec 4‐7; Orlando, Florida. 2010. [Abstract no: 844]CENTRAL
Ware RE, Helms RW, SWiTCH Investigators. Stroke with transfusions changing to hydroxyurea (SWiTCH). Blood 2012;119(17):3925‐32. CENTRAL
Ware RE, McMurray MA, Schultz WH, Alvarez OA, Aygun B, Cavalier ME, et al. Academic community standards for chronic transfusion therapy in children with sickle cell anemia and stroke. Blood. 2006; Vol. 108, issue 11. [Abstract no: 1213]CENTRAL
Ware RE, Schultz WH, Yovetich N, Mortier NA, Alvarez O, Hilliard L, et al. Stroke with transfusions changing to hydroxyurea (SWiTCH): A phase III randomized clinical trial for treatment of children with sickle cell anemia, stroke, and iron overload. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 2011;57(6):1011‐7. CENTRAL

TWiTCH 2016 {published data only}

Aygun B, Wruck LM, Schultz WH, Mueller BU, Brown C, Luchtman‐Jones L, et al. Chronic transfusion practices for prevention of primary stroke in children with sickle cell anemia and abnormal TCD velocities. American Journal of Hematology 2012;87(4):428‐30. [CENTRAL: 1139772; CRS: 5500135000001510; PUBMED: 22231377]CENTRAL
Helton KJ, Roberts D, Schultz WH, Davis BR, Kalfa TA, Pressel SL, et al. Effects of chronic transfusion therapy on MRI and MRA in children with sickle cell anemia at risk for primary stroke: baseline imaging from the Twitch Trial. Blood 2014;124(21):4052. CENTRAL
Imran H, Aygun B, Davis BR, Pressel SL, Schultz WH, Jackson S, et al. Effects of chronic transfusion therapy on transcranial doppler ultrasonography velocities in children with sickle cell anemia at risk for primary stroke: Baseline findings from the twitch trial. Blood 2014;124(21):87. CENTRAL
NCT01425307. Transcranial doppler (TCD) with transfusions changing to hydroxyurea (TWiTCH). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01425307 accessed 29 May 2016). CENTRAL
Ware RE, Davis BR, Schultz WH, Brown C, Aygun B, Sarnaik SA, et al. TCD with transfusions changing to hydroxyurea (TWITCH): Hydroxyurea therapy as an alternative to transfusions for primary stroke prevention in children with sickle cell anemia. Blood 2015;126(23):3. CENTRAL
Ware RE, Davis BR, Schultz WH, Brown RC, Aygun B, Sarnaik S, et al. Hydroxycarbamide versus chronic transfusion for maintenance of transcranial doppler flow velocities in children with sickle cell anaemia ‐ TCD with Transfusions Changing to Hydroxyurea (TWiTCH): A multicentre, open‐label, phase 3, non‐inferiority trial. Lancet 2016;387(10019):661‐70. [CENTRAL: 1138971; CRS: 5500050000000362; EMBASE: 20160126001; NCT01425307: TCD With Transfusions Changing to Hydroxyurea (TWiTCH): A Phase III Randomized Trial to Compare Standard Therapy (Erythrocyte Transfusions) With Alternative Therapy (Hydroxyurea) for the Maintenance of Lowered TCD Velocities in Pediatric Subjects With Sickle Cell Anemia and Abnormal Pre‐treatment TCD Velocities]CENTRAL
Wood JC, Cohen A, Aygun B, Imran H, Luchtman‐Jones L, Thompson AA, et al. Extrahepatic iron deposition in chronically transfused children with sickle cell anemia ‐ Baseline findings from the twitch trial. Blood 2013;122(21):2238. CENTRAL
Wood JC, Cohen AR, Pressel SL, Aygun B, Imran H, Luchtman‐Jones L, et al. Organ iron accumulation in chronically transfused children with sickle cell anaemia: Baseline results from the TWiTCH trial. British Journal of Haematology 2016;172(1):122‐30. [CENTRAL: 1133502; CRS: 5500050000000361; EMBASE: 20151011308]CENTRAL
Wood JC, Pressel S, Rogers ZR, Odame I, Kwiatkowski JL, Lee MT, et al. Liver iron concentration measurements by MRI in chronically transfused children with sickle cell anemia: Baseline results from the TWiTCH trial. American Journal of Hematology 2015;90(9):806‐10. [CENTRAL: 1090263; CRS: 5500050000000271; EMBASE: 2015311270]CENTRAL

References to studies excluded from this review

Bernaudin 2015 {published data only}

Bernaudin FV, Ducros‐Miralles S, Ducros‐Miralles E, Delatour RP, Dalle J‐H, Petras E, et al. French national drepagreffe trial: Cognitive performances and neuroimaging at enrollment and after 12 months on transfusion program or transplantation (AP‐HP: NCT 01340404). Blood 2015;126(23):544. CENTRAL

SCATE 2015 {published data only}

Hankins JS, McCarville MB, Rankine‐Mullings A, Reid ME, Lobo CL, Moura PG, et al. Prevention of conversion to abnormal transcranial Doppler with hydroxyurea in sickle cell anemia: A Phase III international randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Hematology 2015;90(12):1099‐105. CENTRAL
NCT01531387. Sparing conversion to abnormal TCD (transcranial doppler) elevation (SCATE). clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01531387 (accessed 06 November 2013). CENTRAL

Adams 1992

Adams RJ, Nichols FT, Figueroa R, McKie V, Lott T. Transcranial Doppler correlation with cerebral angiography in sickle cell disease. Stroke 1992;23(8):1073‐7.

Adams 1998a

Adams RJ, McKie VC, Brambilla D, Carl E, Gallagher D, Nichols FT, et al. Stroke prevention trial in sickle cell anemia. Controlled Clinical Trials 1998;19(1):110‐29.

Adams 1998b

Adams RJ, McKie VC, Hsu L, Files B, Vichinsky E, Pegelow C, et al. Prevention of a first stroke by transfusions in children with sickle cell anemia and abnormal results on transcranial doppler ultrasonography. New England Journal of Medicine 1998;339(1):5‐11.

Ansong 2013

Ansong D, Osei Akoto A, Ocloo D, Ohene‐Frempong K. Sickle cell disease: management options and challenges in developing countries. Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases 2013;5(1):e2013062.

Aygun 2009

Aygun B, McMurray MA, Schultz WH, Kwiatkowski JL, Hilliard L, Alvarez O, et al. Chronic transfusion practice for children with sickle cell anaemia and stroke. British Journal of Haematology 2009;145(4):524‐8.

Bernaudin 2011

Bernaudin F, Verlhac S, Arnaud C, Kamdem A, Chevret S, Hau I, et al. Impact of early transcranial Doppler screening and intensive therapy on cerebral vasculopathy outcome in a newborn sickle cell anemia cohort. Blood 2011;117(4):1130‐40.

Chou 2013

Chou ST, Jackson T, Vege S, Smith‐Whitley K, Friedman DF, Westhoff CM. High prevalence of red blood cell alloimmunization in sickle cell disease despite transfusion from Rh‐matched minority donors. Blood 2013;122:1062‐1071.

Cohen 1992

Cohen AR, Martin MB, Silber JH, Kim HC, Ohene‐Frempong K, Schwarz E. A modified program for prevention of stroke in sickle cell disease. Blood 1992;79(7):1657‐61.

Cohen 1996

Cohen AR, Norris CF, Smith‐Whitley K. Transfusion therapy for sickle cell disease. In: Capon SM, Chambers LA editor(s). New Directions in Pediatric Hematology. Bethesda MD: American Association of Blood Banks, 1996:39‐85.

Covidence 2015 [Computer program]

Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software. Version accessed prior to 28 November 2016. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation, 2015.

DeBaun 2006

DeBaun MR, Derdeyn CP, McKinstry RC. Etiology of strokes in children with sickle cell anemia. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 2006;12(3):192‐9.

Deeks 2011

Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration.

Enninful‐Eghan 2010

Enninful‐Eghan H, Moore RH, Ichord R, Smith‐Whitley K, Kwiatkowski JL. Transcranial doppler ultrasonography and prophylactic transfusion program is effective in preventing overt stroke in children with sickle cell disease. Journal of Pediatrics 2010;157(3):479‐84.

Estcourt 2016

Estcourt LJ, Fortin PM, Hopewell S, Trivella M, Doree C, Abboud MR. Interventions for preventing silent cerebral infarcts in people with sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012389]

Fullerton 2004

Fullerton HJ, Adams RJ, Zhao S, Johnston SC. Declining stroke rates in Californian children with sickle cell disease. Blood 2004;104(2):336‐9.

Gravitz 2014

Gravitz L, Pincock S. Sickle‐cell disease. Nature 2014;515:S1.

Grosse 2011

Grosse SD, Odame I, Atrash HK, Amendah DD, Piel FB, PhD, et al. Sickle cell disease in Africa. A neglected cause of early childhood mortality. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2011;41:S398‐405.

Guilliams 2015

Guilliams KP, Fields ME, Hulbert ML. Higher‐than‐expected prevalence of silent cerebral infarcts in children with hemoglobin SC disease. Blood 2015;125:416‐417.

Higgins 2011a

Higgins J P T, Deeks J J. Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editors(s).Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.. Available from handbook.cochrane.org. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration.

Higgins 2011b

Higgins J P T, Altman D G, Sterne J A C. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s).Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration.

Higgins 2011c

Higgins J P T, Deeks J J, Altman D G. Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration.

Inati 2011

Inati A, Khoriaty E, Musallam KM. Iron in sickle‐cell disease: what have we learned over the years?. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 2011;56(2):182‐90.

Kinney 1999

Kinney TR, Sleeper LA, Wang WC, Zimmerman RA, Pegelow CH, Ohene‐Frempong K, et al. Silent cerebral infarcts in sickle cell anemia: a risk factor analysis. Pediatrics 1999;103(3):640‐5.

Kwiatkowski 2009

Kwiatkowski JL, Zimmerman RA, Pollock AN, Seto W, Smith‐Whitley K, Shults J, et al. Silent infarcts in young children with sickle cell disease. British Journal of Haemtology 2009;146(3):300‐5.

Lee 2006

Lee MT, Piomelli S, Granger S, Miller ST, Harkness S, Brambilla DJ, et al. Stroke Prevention Trial in Sickle Cell Anemia (STOP): extended follow‐up and final results. Blood 2006;108(3):847‐52.

McCarville 2008

McCarville MB, Goodin GS, Fortner G, Li CS, Smeltzer MP, Adams R, et al. Evaluation of a comprehensive transcranial doppler screening program for children with sickle cell anemia. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 2008;50(4):818‐21.

Nagel 2003

Nagel RL, Fabry ME, Steinberg MH. The paradox of hemoglobin SC disease. Blood Reviews 2003;17(3):167‐78.

NICE 2010

(NICE) National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Sickle cell disease 2010. cks.nice.org.uk/sickle‐cell‐disease#!backgroundsub:3(accessed April 2016).

Ohene‐Frempong 1999

Ohene‐Frempong K. Sickle cell disease in the United States of America and Africa. Hematology (American Society of Hematology Education Program). American Society of Hematology, 1999:64‐72.

Pegelow 1995

Pegelow CH, Adams RJ, McKie V, Abboud M, Berman B, Miller ST, et al. Risk of recurrent stroke in patients with sickle cell disease treated with erythrocyte transfusions. Journal of Pediatrics 1995;126(6):896‐9.

Piel 2012

Piel F B, Patil A P, Howes R E, Nyangiri O A, Gething P W, Dewi M, et al. Global epidemiology of sickle haemoglobin in neonates: a contemporary geostatistical model‐based map and population estimates. Lancet 2012;381:142‐51.

Pleasants 2014

Pleasants S. Epidemiology: a moving target. Nature 2014;515:S2‐3.

Powars 2000

Powars DR. Management of cerebral vasculopathy in children with sickle cell anaemia. British Journal of Hematology 2000;108(4):666‐78.

Rana 1997

Rana S, Houston PE, Surana N, Shalaby‐Rana EI, Castro OL. Discontinuation of long‐term transfusion therapy in patients with sickle cell disease and stroke. Journal of Pediatrics 1997;131(5):757‐60.

Rees 2010

Rees D C, Williams T N, Gladwin M T. Sickle‐cell disease. Lancet 2010;376:2018‐31.

Review Manager 5.3 [Computer program]

Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

Rumaney 2014

Rumaney MB, Ngo Bitoungui VJ, Vorster AA, Ramesar R, Kengne AP, Ngogang J, et al. The co‐inheritance of alpha‐thalassemia and sickle cell anemia Is associated with better hematological indices and lower consultations rate in Cameroonian patients and could improve their survival. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e100516.

Sarnaik 1979

Sarnaik S, Soorya D, Kim J, Ravindranath Y, Lusher J. Periodic transfusions for sickle cell anemia and CNS infarction. American Journal of Diseases of Children 1979;133(12):1254‐7.

Schünemann 2011a

Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Higgins JPT, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Guyatt GH. Chapter 11: Presenting results and 'Summary of findings' tables. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.. Available from handbook.cochrane.org. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration.

Schünemann 2011b

Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Glasziou P, et al. Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editors(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration.

Scothorn 2002

Scothorn DJ,  Price C,  Schwartz D,  Terrill C,  Buchanan GR,  Shurney W,  et al. Risk of recurrent stroke in children with sickle cell disease receiving blood transfusion therapy for at least five years after initial stroke. Journal of Pediatrics 2002;140(3):48‐54.

Serjeant 1992

Serjeant GR. Surgery and anaesthesia. Sickle Cell Disease. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992:455‐8.

Smith‐Whitley 2012

Smith‐Whitley K, Thompson AA. Indications and complications of transfusions in sickle cell disease. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 2012;59(2):358‐64.

Steinberg 1999

Steinberg MH. Management of sickle cell disease. New England Journal of Medicine 1999;340(13):1021‐30.

Steinberg 2012

Steinberg MH, Sebastiani P. Genetic modifiers of sickle cell disease. American Journal of Hematology 2012;87(8):795‐803.

Sterne 2011

Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D. Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration.

Styles 1994

Styles LA, Vichinsky E. Effects of a long‐term transfusion regimen on sickle cell‐related illnesses. Journal of Pediatrics 1994;125(6 Pt 1):909‐11.

Telfer 2007

Telfer P, Coen P, Chakravorty S, Wilkey O, Evans J, Newell H, et al. Clinical outcomes in children with sickle cell disease living in England: a neonatal cohort in East London. Haematologica 2007;92(7):905‐12.

Venkatesubramanian 1994

Venketasubramanian N, Prohovnik I, Hurlet A, Mohr JP, Piomelli S. Middle cerebral artery velocity changes during transfusion in sickle cell anemia. Stroke 1994;25(11):2153‐8.

Wang 1991

Wang W, Kovnar EH, Tonkin IL, Mulhern RK, Langston JW, Day S, et al. High risk of recurrent stroke after discontinuance of five to twelve years of transfusion therapy in patients with sickle cell disease. Journal of Pediatrics 1991;118(3):377‐82.

Wang 2005

Wang WC, Morales KH, Scher CD, Styles L, Olivieri N, Adams R, et al. Effect of long‐term transfusion on growth in children with sickle cell anemia: results of the STOP trial. Journal of Pediatrics 2005;147(2):244‐7.

Ware 2004

Ware RE, Zimmermann SA, Sylvestre PB, Mortier NA, Davis JS, Treem WR, et al. Prevention of secondary stroke and resolution of transfusional iron overload in children with sickle cell anemia using hydroxyurea and phlebotomy. Journal of Pediatrics 2004;145(3):346‐52.

Ware 2010

Ware RE. How I use hydroxyurea to treat young patients with sickle cell anemia. Blood 2010;115(26):5300‐11.

Wilimas 1980

Wilimas J, Goff JR, Anderson HR, Langston JW, Thomson E. Efficacy of transfusion therapy for one to two years in patients with sickle cell disease and cerebrovascular accidents. Journal of Pediatrics 1980;96(2):205‐8.

References to other published versions of this review

Hirst 2002

Hirst C, Wang WC. Blood transfusion for preventing stroke in people with sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003146]

Wang 2013

Wang WC, Dwan K. Blood transfusion for preventing primary and secondary stroke in people with sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003146.pub2]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

SIT 2014

Methods

Multicentre randomised trial in 29 clinical centres in the USA, Canada, France and the UK.

Recruitment: December 2004 to May 2010.

The last participant enrolled completed the exit visit on July 29, 2013.

Participants

Inclusion criteria: children aged 5 to 15 years, confirmed diagnosis of haemoglobin SS or haemoglobin Sβ0 thalassaemia, and at least one infarct‐like lesion on the screening MRI scan defined as an MRI signal abnormality that was at least 3 mm in one dimension and that was visible in two planes on fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) T2‐weighted images, as determined by agreement of two of the three trial neuroradiologists.

Exclusion criteria: history of focal neurologic deficit associated with an infarct on brain MRI, a seizure disorder, treatment with hydroxyurea in the previous 3 months, a history of regular transfusion therapy, or imaging or non‐imaging TCD measurement that was above the trial‐defined thresholds.

Participant flow: 1210 registered for screening; 1074 had screening MRI evaluated by neuroradiology committee; 675 had normal, 20 indeterminate MRI; 379 had infarct‐like lesions on screening MRI; 291 had infarct‐like lesions adjudicated by neurology committee; 220 had pre‐randomisation MRIs adjudicated by neuroradiology committee; 196 underwent randomisation.

Transfusion arm:N = 99 (15 crossed over to observation)

Sex: male: 59 (60%); F: 40 (40%)

Age: 5 to 7: 26 (26%): 8 to 10: 35 (35%); 11 to 13: 32 (32%); 14 to 15: 6 (6%)

TCD velocity: median (IQR) cm/sec: 147 (123‐168) (N = 98)

Lesions on initial MRI: 99 (100%)

Parental report of recurring headaches: yes: 37 (37%); No: 62 (63%)

Steady state haemoglobin: median (IQR): g/L: 77 (72 to 84)

Phenotypes: not stated (Included only HbSS or HbSβº)

Hb F% median (IQR): 9.0 (4.0 to 14.0)

Alpha thalassaemia: not reported

Observation arm:N = 97 (6 crossed over to transfusion)

Sex: male: 52 (54%); F: 45 (46%)

Age: 5 to 7: 28 (29%): 8 to 10: 32 (33%); 11 to 13: 29 (30%); 14 to 15: 8 (8%)

TCD velocity: median (IQR) cm/sec: 143 (131 to 163)

Lesions on initial MRI: 97 (100%)

Parental report of recurring headaches: yes: 43 (44%); No: 54 (56%)

Steady state haemoglobin: median (IQR): g/L: 79 (74 to 89)

Phenotypes: not stated trial included only HbSS or HbSβº

Hb F% median (IQR): 10.0 (5.0 to 15.0)

Alpha thalassaemia: not reported

Interventions

Transfusion: transfusion arm received a transfusion approximately monthly to maintain a target haemoglobin concentration greater than 90 g/L and a target haemoglobin S concentration of 30% or less.

Red cell component: leucocyte‐depleted, negative for haemoglobin S.

Red cell matching: ABO, Rh and Kell antigens.

Iron chelation: ferritin levels were monitored before each transfusion. Site investigators were advised to initiate chelation therapy for participants who had ferritin levels greater than 1500 ng per millilitre for 2 or more consecutive months.

Observation: observation arm received standard care with no treatment for silent infarcts and no hydroxyurea therapy and were evaluated quarterly

Outcomes

Primary outcome: the recurrence of infarct or haemorrhage as determined by neuroimaging, clinical evidence of permanent neurologic injury, or both. A new infarct had to meet the criteria for a SCI; an enlarged SCI was defined as a previously identified silent cerebral infarct that increased by at least 3 mm along any linear dimension in any plane on MRI; TIA, included in secondary analyses of neurologic outcomes, defined as an event that resulted in focal neurologic deficits that lasted less than 24 hours, did not result in abnormalities on T2‐weighted or FLAIR images that were indicative of an acute infarct, and had no other reasonable medical explanation.

Secondary outcomes: changes in cognition, assessed by measurement of IQ scores with the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence12 or the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence III; also assessed scores on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF).

Notes

Funding: supported by grants from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (5U01NS042804, 3U01NS042804 [American Recovery Reinvestment ACT supplementary grant] to Dr DeBaun); the Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences, National Center for Research Resources, and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Clinical and Translational Research; NIH Roadmap for Medical Research (UL1TR000448, to Washington University; UL1TR001079, to Johns Hopkins University; and UL1TR000003, to the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia); and Research and Development in the National Health Service, UK.

Declarations of interest: Dr McKinstry reports receiving honoraria and lecture fees from Siemens Healthcare and consulting fees from Guerbet; Dr Woods, receiving fees for serving on a data and safety monitoring board from Mast Therapeutics and grant support from ClinDatrix and Novartis; Dr Kwiatkowski, receiving fees for serving on an advisory board from Shire Pharmaceuticals, consulting fees from Shire Pharmaceuticals and Sideris Pharmaceuticals, and grant support from Resonance Health; Dr. Heiny, receiving lecture fees from Novartis; Dr. Redding‐Lallinger, receiving grant support from Eli Lilly and Mast Therapeutics; and Dr. Casella, receiving honoraria, travel support, and consulting fees through his institution from Mast Therapeutics and being an inventor and a named party on a patent and licensing agreement for an assay panel of brain biomarkers for the detection of brain injury (PCT US2011/056338), licensed to ImmunArray with pending royalties only. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Trial registration: NCT00072761 & ISRCTN52713285.

Mean length of follow‐up: children were followed for a median of 3 years.

Power calculation: a sample size of 204 participants (102 in each group) would give the trial 85% power to detect a decrease of at least 86% in the prevalence of the primary end point, assuming a 10% dropout rate and a crossover rate of 16% from transfusion to observation and 3% from observation to transfusion, at a two‐tailed nominal alpha level of 0.05.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation assignments were provided by the statistical data coordinating centre with the use of a permuted block design, with stratification according to site, age, and sex. Participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the observation group or the transfusion group and were followed until the occurrence of a trial end‐point event or until exit from the trial.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Assignments were provided by the statistical data coordinating centre.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

High risk

By the nature of the trial treatments used (blood transfusions vs observation), it is impractical to make SIT trial blinded (masked).

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Stroke and TIA

Low risk

Members of neuroradiology and neurology committees, who were unaware of the trial‐group assignments, adjudicated neurologic and MRI findings.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes apart from stroke or all‐cause mortality

High risk

Unblinded trial.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

All outcomes reported. All participants accounted for, conducted an intention‐to‐treat and per protocol analysis for the primary outcomes The primary end point was ascertained for 185 of the 196 participants (94%). Of the 99 participants randomly assigned to the transfusion group, 90 started receiving transfusions within 4 weeks after assignment. The cross‐over rate from transfusion to observation was 15% (15 of 99 participants); 9 participants declined blood transfusion, and 6 crossed over to observation at a median time of 34 days.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

Protocol available and all planned outcomes reported.

Other bias

Unclear risk

Among participants in the observation group, 32% received transfusions (a median of 3 transfusions each), including 6 participants who crossed over to regular monthly transfusions at a median of 1.7 years. During the course of the trial, hydroxyurea was started in 14 of 97 participants (14%) in the observation group and in 3 of 99 (3%) in the transfusion group because of disease severity.

Exclusion criteria included treatment with hydroxyurea. Not clear how long or when treatment began ‐ possible contamination and unknown effect on outcomes. 6 also crossed over to regular transfusion giving 20% cross‐over rate to either hydroxyurea or transfusion.

STOP 1998

Methods

Multicentre randomised controlled trial conducted in 12 centres in the USA and Canada in children 2 ‐ 16 years of age with HbSS or HbSβº thalassaemia.

Screening began in January 1995 and ended in November 1996. The trial was to run to December 1998 but was stopped in September 1997.

Participants

Inclusion criteria: children 2 to 16 years of age and who had been given a diagnosis of sickle cell anaemia or sickle ß0 thalassaemia at high risk of stroke with a blood flow velocity of at least 200 cm per second on 2 TCD trials.

Exclusion criteria: history of stroke, had an indication for or contraindication to long‐term transfusion, were receiving other treatments that affected the risk of stroke, were infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), had been treated for seizures, were pregnant, or had a serum ferritin concentration above 500 ng per millilitre.

Participant flow: screened: N = 1934; eligible: N = 206 randomised: N = 130

Transfusion:N = 63

Sex: male: 31 (49%)

Age: mean (SD): 8.2 (3.2) years

HbS% mean (SD): 87 (10)

HbF% mean (SD): 8.0 (5.2)

Alpha thalassaemia: 14 (22%)

TCD velocity: mean (SD): 223 (27) cm/sec

Lesions on initial MRI: N (%) participants: 19 (31%)

Standard care:N = 67

Sex: male: 29 (43%)

Age: mean (SD): 8.4 (3.3) years

HbS% mean (SD): 87 (7)

HbF% mean (SD): 9.4 (5.0)

Alpha thalassaemia: 7 (9%)

TCD velocity: mean (SD) : 223 (28) cm/sec

Lesions on initial MRI N (%): participants 25 (38%)

Phenotypes: not reported (trial included only HbSS or HbSβº)

Interventions

Transfusion: N = 63

In the transfusion arm the goal was to reach an HbS concentration < 30 per cent of total haemoglobin within 21 days without exceeding a haemoglobin concentration of 120 g/L and a hematocrit of 36%. Exchange or simple transfusion were allowed: 63% were simple transfusions, 12% were exchange; 25% a combination of simple and exchange. Red cells were delivered in a volume of approximately 10 to 15 mL per kg of packed cells per transfusion.

Red cell component: leucocyte‐depleted, negative for haemoglobin S.

Red cell matching: ABO, Rh and Kell antigens.

Iron chelation: none. Potential participants with a ferritin level above 500 ng/mL were excluded from the trial. The intention was to exclude any child with a significant iron burden before initiation of treatment, thus avoiding
clinically significant iron overload during the trial.

Standard care:N = 67

Outcomes

Primary outcome: cerebral infarction and intracranial haemorrhage.

Secondary outcomes: death, transfusion‐related adverse events.

Notes

Funding: supported by Cooperative Agreements (U10 HL 52193 and U10 HL 52016) with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Declarations of interest: none published.

Trial registration: no registration found.

Mean (SD) length of follow‐up: transfusion arm: 21.0 (5.7) months; Standard care: 18.3 (7.0) months.

Power calculation: "Estimates of stroke risk for patients randomized to standard care were obtained by fitting an exponential model to the follow‐up of TCD (1) patients follow‐up, it was estimated that 47% of patients in this group should develop stroke on study. Assuming transfusion prevents 70% of these strokes, 14% of the patients randomized to transfusion should have strokes on study. Taken together, these values imply that a sample size of 46 per treatment arm should provide the desired statistical power of 90% to detect a 70% reduction in stroke incidence at a type I error rate of 0.05 for a two‐sided test".

Analysis: 4 interim analyses and one final analysis were planned. the date of the first analysis changed from 20 months to 14 months after recruitment began.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"The DCC developed permuted blocks within which treatment allocations were randomly and evenly assigned. The blocks themselves were
randomly assigned to each of the 12 Centers."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"After telephone verification that the patient was eligible and acquisition of written parental consent, the DCC ran a short randomization program and provided the Investigator with the trial group assignment." " Permuted blocks are used to blind Investigators to the potential treatment assignment of each patient while preserving approximate balance within and across Centers. The DCC provided the Clinical Center Investigator and patient with the treatment assignment."

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Clinicians and participants were unblinded.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Stroke and TIA

Low risk

A panel of physicians with no knowledge of the children’s treatment assignments who were not affiliated with the trial centres determined whether an event was a stroke. The primary end points were cerebral infarction and intracranial haemorrhage. "The protocol was intended to identify all neurologic events. A panel of physicians with no knowledge of the children’s treatment
assignments who were not affiliated with the trial centres determined whether an event was a stroke.".

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes apart from stroke or all‐cause mortality

High risk

Unblinded trial.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

An ITT analysis was used, despite 12 participants crossing over between groups (2) or withdrawing from the trial (10). Reasons were provided. 10 participants from the transfusion group withdrew from the trial because of problems with compliance (n = 4), multiple alloantibodies (n = 1), ineligibility (n = 1) or other unspecified reasons (n = 4). Two participants from the standard care group crossed over to the transfusion group, one on the second day due to diagnosis of subacute intracerebral hematoma and the other after 12 months for treatment of leg ulcers.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

No protocol available and no prospective trial registration.

Other bias

Unclear risk

"Four interim analyses and one final analysis were planned, with the Lan–DeMets approximation of the O’Brien–Fleming stopping boundary. The date of the first analysis was changed from 20 months to 14 months after recruitment began." "Because of the high rate of stroke in the standard‐care group and the significant effect of transfusion found at the second interim analysis, the data safety and monitoring board recommended that the trial be stopped 16 months before the planned date of December 1998 so that transfusion could be offered to children in the standard‐care group."

There was an imbalance between the number of participants with alpha thalassaemia trait between treatment arms (22% transfusion arm versus 9% standard treatment arm).

STOP 2 2005

Methods

Multicentre RCT, extension to the STOP trial conducted in 23 centres (including the 12 centres in STOP) in the U.S. and Canada to determine whether regular blood transfusions for the prevention of stroke could be stopped in children and youth 5 ‐ 20 years of age with SCD. Children were monitored by transcranial Doppler examinations after transfusions were halted and by resuming transfusions if the examination indicated a high risk of stroke. This trial was an extension of the previous STOP trial, in which children with abnormal velocities on TCD ultrasonographic examination were administered transfusions to prevent a first stroke.

The trial was meant to be a 54‐month trial involving 50 participants in each group, with 60 of the participants enrolled during the first 12 months and 40 during the next 24 months; after recruitment ended, there were 18 months of follow‐up.

Four interim analyses and one final analysis were planned for the composite end point. The trial was stopped on the advice of the data safety and monitoring committee because of concern about safety at the fourth interim analysis with 79 participants enrolled.

Participants

Inclusion criteria: children whose Doppler studies normalized after 30 or more months of transfusion were eligible for the present trial. In addition, children who had not participated in the previous STOP trial whose condition met the criteria for eligibility and treatment were also eligible for the present trial. Adequate participation in a transfusion program (≥ 24 transfusions in 30 months and Hb S < 30% in at least 20 of the 30 months); 2 Normal TCD examinations at least 2 weeks apart while receiving transfusions within 4 months of randomisation; age, 5 to 20 years; consent to participate in trial.

Exclusion criteria: prior stroke; Indication for chronic transfusion; contraindication for chronic transfusion; moderate‐to‐severe intracranial arterial disease on MRA.

Participant flow: screened: not reported; eligible: not reported; randomised: N = 79.

Transfusion continued: N = 38

Sex: male: 20 (53%)

Age: mean (SD): 12.5 (3.3)

HbS % mean (SD): 21.0 (8.6)

HbF% mean (SD): 2.4 (1.8)

Alpha thalassaemia: not reported

TCD velocity: mean (SD): 139 (16) cm/sec

Lesions on initial MRI: 10 (26%)

Phenotypes:Not reported (trial included only HbSS or HbSβº)

Transfusion halted: N = 41

Sex: male: 13 (32%)

Age: mean (SD): 12.05 (3.1)
HbS% mean (SD): 19.0 (11)

HbF% mean (SD): 2.3 (1.5)

Alpha thalassaemia: not reported

TCD velocity: mean (SD): 143 (18) cm/sec

Lesions on initial MRI: 11 (27%)

Phenotypes: not reported (trial included only HbSS or HbSβº)

Interventions

Transfusion continued: n = 38.

Transfusion could be simple, manual exchange or automated exchange. antigens.

Red cell component: leucocyte‐depleted, negative for haemoglobin S.

Red cell matching: ABO, Rh and Kell antigens.

Iron chelation: chelation therapy with the use of deferoxamine was recommended if serum ferritin levels exceeded 2500 ng per millilitre.

Transfusion halted: n = 41.

Participants in the transfusion‐halted group could receive transfusions to treat complications of sickle cell disease. Initiation of hydroxyurea therapy or regular transfusion was designated as a cross‐over and data was censored on the patient as of the date of treatment.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: composite end point was a stroke (cerebral infarction or intracranial haemorrhage) or reversion to abnormal velocity on transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, defined as 2 consecutive studies with abnormal velocities, 3 consecutive studies with an average velocity of 200 cm per second or more, or 3 consecutive inadequate studies plus evidence of severe stenosis on MRA.

Secondary outcomes: also reports deaths, acute chest syndrome and transfusion adverse events.

Notes

Funding: supported by grants (U01 HL 052193 and U01 HL 052016) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Declarations of interest: no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Trial registration: no registration found.

Mean length of follow‐up: the median time from randomisation to an end‐point event was 3.2 months (range, 2.1 to 10.1), and the mean (SD) was 4.5 (2.6) months.

Power calculation: for a 54‐month trial involving 50 participants in each group, with 60 of the participants enrolled during the first 12 months and 40 during the next 24 months; after recruitment ended, there were 18 months of follow‐up.

Analysis: the trial was stopped by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute on the advice of the data safety and monitoring committee because of concern about safety at the fourth interim analysis.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Participants were stratified at randomisation according to the presence or absence of ischaemic lesions on MRI; random, permuted blocks of 4 or 6 participants were used within each group as defined by MRI. Institutional balancing with a tolerance of two participants per site was imposed to maintain an approximate balance in treatment assignments at each site. Eligible participants underwent randomisation with equal probability of continuing or halting transfusion.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of allocation concealment not reported.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Participants and personnel were unblinded.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Stroke and TIA

Low risk

"Suspected strokes were adjudicated by experts unaware of the treatment assignment using clinical data and all available imaging data. Stroke was defined as persistent neurologic abnormalities or transient symptoms accompanied by a new cerebral lesion appropriate to the patient’s clinical presentation." "The Doppler studies were transmitted to central readers who were unaware of the treatment assignments. All results were recorded as the time‐averaged mean of the maximum velocity in the middle cerebral or internal carotid artery and were classified as normal (all mean velocities of <170 cm per second), conditional (at least one mean velocity of 170 to 199 cm per second but none ≥200 cm per second), abnormal (at least one mean velocity of at least 200 cm per second), or inadequate (no information available on one or both middle cerebral arteries)".

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes apart from stroke or all‐cause mortality

High risk

Unblinded trial.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

It was not stated whether intent‐to‐treat analysis was used. Data on 9 participants assigned to no continued transfusion who did not have a primary end‐point event were censored: 5 of these participants resumed chronic transfusion and four started treatment with hydroxyurea. Of 38 participants assigned to continued transfusion, 5 discontinued participation in the trial. N = 14 (17%) of participants discontinued or censored.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Primary outcomes reported. Did not state secondary outcomes. Not clear if all adverse events reported and also censored data not contributing to outcome reporting.

Other bias

Unclear risk

The trial was stopped by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute on the advice of the data safety and monitoring committee because of concern about safety at the fourth interim analysis.

SWiTCH 2012

Methods

Multicentre randomised controlled non‐inferiority trial conducted in 26 paediatric sickle cell centres in the USA.

Total duration of trial treatment was 30 months after randomisation, with a final trial visit scheduled 6 months after discontinuation of trial treatments.

Participants

Inclusion criteria: paediatric participants with severe forms of SCA (HbSS, HbS/βº‐thalassemia, HbS/OArab); age range of 5.0 to 18.9 years, inclusive, at the time of enrolment; initial (primary) completed overt clinical stroke after the age 12 months with documented infarction on brain CT or MRI; at least 18 months of chronic monthly erythrocyte transfusions since primary stroke; transfusional iron overload, defined as a previously documented liver iron concentration ≥ 5.0 mg Fe per g of dry weight liver or serum ferritin ≥ 500 ng/mL on 2 independent measurements; adequate monthly erythrocyte transfusions with average HbS ≤ 45% (the upper limit of the established academic community standard) for the past 6 months before enrolment; parent or guardian willing and able to provide informed consent with verbal or written assent from the child (< 18 years of age), and subject willing and able to provide informed consent (≥ 18 years of age); ability to comply with trial related treatments, evaluations, and follow‐up.

Exclusion criteria: inability to receive or tolerate chronic RBC transfusion therapy; inability to take or tolerate daily oral hydroxyurea; clinical and laboratory evidence of hypersplenism (temporary); abnormal laboratory values at initial evaluation (temporary); current participation in other therapeutic clinical trials; current use of other therapeutic agents for sickle cell disease (e.g. arginine, decitabine, magnesium); any condition or chronic illness, such as a positive tuberculin (PPD) test, which in the opinion of the investigator makes participation ill‐advised; inability or unwillingness to complete required screening studies, including blood tests, brain MRI/MRA, and liver biopsy; a sibling enrolled in SWiTCH.

Participant flow: screened: N = 202; enrolled: N = 161; randomised: N = 134

Transfusion + chelation: N = 66 (one moved before starting trial treatment)

Sex: Male: 31 (47%)

Age: Mean (SD): 13.3 (3.8)

Phenotype: HbSS: 66 (100%)

Previous recurrent stroke: 4 (6%)

History of TIA: 11 (17%)

Infarction: 65 (98%)

Vasculopathy: 54 (82%)

Moya‐moya: 5 (8%)

Liver iron content (LIC), mg Fe/g dw liver median (IQR): 14.5 (9.5 to 23.3)

Serum ferritin, ng/mL median (IQR): 3282.0 (2321.0 to 4306.0)

HbS% median (IQR): 27.0 (21.2 to 38.6)

HbF% median (IQR): 1.7 (1.0 to 2.5)

Alpha thalassaemia: not reported

Hydroxyurea + phlebotomy:N = 67

Sex: male: 41 (61%)

Age: Mean (SD): 13.0 (4.0)

Phenotype: HbSS: 66 (99%)

Previous recurrent stroke: 10 (15%)

History of TIA: 10 (15%)

Infarction: 65 (98%)

Vasculopathy: 53 (79%)

Moya‐moya: 11 (16%)

Liver iron content (LIC), mg Fe/g dw liver median (IQR): 13.9 (8.7 to 22.9)

Serum ferritin, ng/mL median (IQR): 3346.0 (2202.0 to 4682.0)

HbS% median (IQR): 30.3 (23.8 to 39.6)

HbF% median (IQR): 1.4 (0.8 to 2.2)

Alpha thalassaemia: not reported

Interventions

Standard treatment (transfusion + chelation): N = 66

For standard treatment (blood transfusion + iron chelation) participants received monthly blood transfusions designed to maintain 30% HbS, with local discretion regarding transfusion type (e.g., simple or erythrocytapheresis).

Red cell component: not reported.

Red cell matching: not reported.

Iron chelation: daily iron chelation.

Hydroxyurea + phlebotomy: N = 67

Participants randomised to hydroxyurea + phlebotomy commenced hydroxyurea at 20 mg/kg/d with stepwise escalation to MTD. Transfusions continued for 4 to 9 months during an overlap phase designed to protect against recurrent stroke during hydroxyurea dose escalation. Once MTD was reached and transfusions were discontinued, phlebotomy commenced with a target of 10 mL/kg (maximum volume, 500 mL) blood removed monthly to reduce iron burden.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: composite primary endpoint of secondary stroke recurrence rate and quantitative liver iron concentration.

Secondary outcomes: non‐stroke neurological events, non‐neurological sickle cell clinical events, quality of life evaluation, and measures of organ function.

Notes

Funding: supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grants U01‐HL078787 (R.E.W.) and U01‐HL078987 (R.W.H.).

Declarations of interest: the authors declare no competing financial interests.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00122980.

Mean length of follow‐up: 6‐month follow‐up.

Power calculation: not stated.

Analysis: because reduction in LIC was not superior on hydroxyurea/phlebotomy, the DSMB concluded that the composite primary trial end point would not be met and recommended trial closure. NHLBI closed SWiTCH N = 40 did not complete treatment phase in transfusion/iron chelation arm and N = 43 did not complete treatment phase in hydroxyurea/phlebotomy arm.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of sequence generation not reported.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of allocation concealment not reported.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

High risk

By the nature of the trial treatments used to prevent recurrent stroke (blood transfusions vs hydroxyurea), it is impractical to make SWiTCH a blinded (masked) trial.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Stroke and TIA

Low risk

The inclusive independent stroke adjudication process for all suspected new neurological events is a novel feature of the trial. Stroke recurrence is a primary trial endpoint but also is a critical safety endpoint for the SWiTCH trial. Accordingly, it was necessary to develop an inclusive process by which all potential stroke events were recognized and systematically adjudicated using a standardized protocol and masked consultants. Participants who develop any acute neurological change are promptly evaluated for possible stroke. In addition, site personnel are provided with a written script to use at each interval clinic visit, to ensure that subjects and families are asked each month about any signs and symptoms of stroke. After a new neurological event is suspected, the stroke adjudication process begins. The clinical history and neurological exam are reviewed by 3 independent neurologists without knowledge of the imaging findings. Simultaneously, the radiological evaluation is reviewed by 3 independent masked neuroradiologists without knowledge of the clinical history or neurological examination. Only after their independent consensus opinions are formed are these two opinions reconciled into a final stroke adjudication decision; a diagnosis of stroke requires new neurological findings with corresponding radiological changes.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes apart from stroke or all‐cause mortality

High risk

The SWiTCH principal investigator was masked to all treatment‐specific results, including laboratory tests and clinical events. In addition, all investigators at the peripheral clinical sites are masked to trial treatment results outside of their own clinical centre.

Unblinded trial.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

The primary statistical analyses of efficacy and safety will be performed on the ITT population, which consists of all participants who were randomised to a trial treatment and for whom outcome data are available.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

High risk

Several secondary outcomes not reported (i.e. quality of life, growth and development, organ damage, transfusion‐related, chelation‐related and phlebotomy related complications)

Other bias

Unclear risk

the DSMB concluded that the composite primary trial end point would not be met and recommended trial closure. NHLBI closed SWiTCH ‐ N = 40 did not complete treatment phase in transfusion/iron chelation arm and N = 43 did not complete treatment phase in hydroxyurea/phlebotomy arm. More participants had moya‐moya in the hydroxyurea arm (11 participants) than the transfusion arm (5 participants), it was not known if there was a difference between treatment arms in the number of participants with other types of severe vasculopathy.

TWiTCH 2016

Methods

Multicentre randomised open‐label non‐inferiority trial conducted at 26 paediatric hospital and health centres in the USA and Canada in children with abnormal TCD velocities greater or equal to 200 cm/s but no vasculopathy

Duration: 24 months after randomisation with a 6‐month visit after completing exit studies.

Participants

Screened: N = 159; excluded: N = 38; randomised: N = 121

Inclusion criteria

  1. Children aged 4 to 16 years with severe forms of sickle cell anaemia (HbSS, HbSβº thalassaemia, HbSOArab)

  2. Documented index (pre‐treatment) abnormally high TCD velocity by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. An abnormally high index TCD is defined as TCD V greater than or equal to 200 cm/sec, or abnormally high TCDi V greater than or equal to 185cm/sec, or TCD maximum V greater than or equal to 250 cm/sec.

  3. At least 12 months of chronic monthly red blood cell transfusions since the index abnormal TCD examination

  4. Adequate monthly erythrocyte transfusions with average HbS level less than or equal to 45% (the upper limit of the established academic community standard) for the past 6 months before enrolment

  5. Parent or guardian willing and able to provide informed consent with verbal or written assent from the child

  6. Ability to comply with trial‐related treatments, evaluations, and follow‐up

Exclusion criteria

  1. Completed overt clinical stroke or TIA

  2. Inability to obtain TCD velocities due to anatomical abnormalities such as:

    1. inadequate bone windows

    2. previous revascularisation procedures

  3. Known severe vasculopathy or moya‐moya disease on brain MRA

  4. Inability to receive or tolerate chronic RBC transfusion therapy, due to any of the following:

    1. multiple RBC alloantibodies making cross‐matching difficult or impossible

    2. RBC autoantibodies making cross‐matching difficult or impossible

    3. religious objection to transfusions that preclude their chronic use

    4. non‐compliance with transfusions over the past 6 months before enrolment (temporary exclusion)

  5. Inability to take or tolerate daily oral hydroxyurea, including:

    1. known allergy to hydroxyurea therapy

    2. positive serology to HIV infection

    3. malignancy

    4. current lactation

    5. previous stem cell transplant or other myelosuppressive therapy

  6. Clinical and laboratory evidence of hypersplenism (temporary exclusions):

    1. Palpable splenomegaly greater than 5cm below the left costal margin

    2. Transfusion requirement greater than 250 mL/kg over the previous 12 months

  7. Abnormal laboratory values at initial evaluation (temporary exclusions):

    1. Pre‐transfusion haemoglobin concentration less than 80 g/L

    2. WBC count less than 3.0 x 10⁹/L

    3. Absolute neutrophil count less than 1.5 x 10⁹/L

    4. Platelet count less than 100 x 10⁹/L

    5. Serum creatinine more than twice the upper limit for age OR greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/dL

  8. Current participation in other therapeutic clinical trials

  9. Current use of other therapeutic agents for SCD (e.g. arginine, decitabine, magnesium). Subjects must have been off hydroxyurea for at least 3 months prior to enrolment.

  10. Any condition or chronic illness, such as a positive tuberculin (PPD) test, which in the opinion of the CI makes participation ill‐advised.

  11. Inability or unwillingness to complete required screening and exit studies, including TCD ultrasonography, brain MRI/MRA, liver MRI and blood tests.

  12. A sibling enrolled in TWiTCH

  13. Pregnancy or unwillingness to use a medically acceptable form of contraception if sexually active (male OR female).

Transfusion (N = 61): (mean (SD) unless otherwise stated)

Sex: male: 19 (31%)

Age: mean (SD): 9.5 ± 2.68

Phenotype: HbSS: 59 (97%)

Age at index abnormal TCD: mean (SD): 5.7 (2.0)

Average index TCD value (cm/s): mean (SD): 226 (25)

Average entry TCD value (cm/s): mean (SD): 145 (21)

Silent cerebral infarct: 25 (41%)

Mild to moderate vasculopathy: 6 (10%)

Transusion duration (years): 3.8 (1.8)

Simple transfusions: 36 (59%)

RBC alloantibodies: 9 (15%)

RBC autoantibodies 12 (20%)

Liver iron (mg Fe per g dry weight liver) Mean (SD): 8.5 (7.5)

Serum ferritin (ng/mL) Mean (SD): 2713 (2207)

Current chelation usage: 51 (84%)

Haemoglobin (g/L) Mean (SD): 93 (8)

HbS% Mean (SD): 26.5 (10.3)

HbF% Mean (SD): 10·3 (6·5)

Alpha thalassaemia: not reported

Hydroxyurea (n = 60): (mean (SD) unless otherwise stated)

Sex: male: 29 (48%)

Age: mean (SD): 9.7 (3.2)

Phenotype: HbSS: 60 (100%)

Age at index abnormal TCD: mean (SD): 5.0 (1.8)

Average index TCD value (cm/s): mean (SD): 220 (17)

Average entry TCD value (cm/s): mean (SD): 145 (26)

SCI: 22 (37%)

Mild to moderate vasculopathy: 4 (7%)

Transfusion duration (years): 4.5 (2.8)

Simple transfusions: 39 (65%)

RBC alloantibodies: 11 (18%)

RBC autoantibodies: 10 (17%)

Liver iron (mg Fe per g dry weight liver): Mean (SD): 11.3 (9.5)

Serum ferritin (ng/mL): mean (SD): 3080 (2347)

Current chelation usage: 48 (80%)

Haemoglobin (g/L): mean (SD): 93 (8)

HbS% Mean (SD): 27.6 (9.9)

HbF% Mean (SD): 8·8 (5·5)

Alpha thalassaemia: not reported

Interventions

Transfusions N = 61:

Participants continued to receive transfusions once per month to maintain HbS at 30% or lower with local discretion with respect to transfusion type (simple, partial exchange, or erythrocytapheresis).

Red cell component: not reported.

Red cell matching: not reported.

Iron chelation: deferasirox was recommended to manage iron overload; children already receiving chelation therapy maintained their current doses; those starting chelation therapy received deferasirox at 10 ‐ 40 mg/kg per day with the dose dependent on liver iron concentration at screening.

Hydroxyurea N = 60:

Participants initiated treatment of hydroxyurea at 20 mg/kg per day (capsules or liquid formulation) with escalation to MTD defined as the dose at which moderate marrow suppression of neutrophils and reticulocytes was achieved. Transfusions were slowly weaned in accordance with a standard protocol over 4 ‐ 9 months.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: TCD time‐averaged mean velocity on the index side defined as the cerebral hemisphere with the higher mean arterial velocity at baseline assessment.

Secondary outcomes: TCD velocity on the non‐index side, new stroke or non‐stroke neurological events, new brain MRI/MRA lesions, hepatic iron overload, sickle‐related events, neuropsychological status, quality of life, growth, and treatment‐related complications.

Notes

Funding: supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute through grants R01 HL‐095647 (REW) and R01 HL‐095511 (BRD).

Declarations of interest: all authors declared.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01425307.

Mean length of follow‐up: 24 months after randomisation,with a 6‐month visit after completing exit studies

Power calculation: 100 participants (50 per treatment arm) who complete the 24‐month post‐randomisation follow‐up period will provide at least 90% power to test the non‐inferiority hypothesis under reasonable scenarios.

Analysis: two planned interim analyses after 33% and 67% of participants had completed exit studies. At the first scheduled interim analysis, non‐inferiority was shown and the sponsor terminated the trial after 50% had exited and repeat analysis confirmed the first interim analysis.

We did analyses in the ITT population, except for a planned per‐protocol analysis of TCD velocities, which excluded participants who exited the trial early.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Participants will be randomised to treatment arm by means of an adaptive randomisation algorithm to maintain balance between treatment groups with respect to site, age, and the mean of 2 screening maximum TCD velocities. Participants are randomised to either the Standard or Alternative treatment arm at an approximately 1 to 1 ratio. Randomisation is stratified within site to achieve approximate balance with respect to two baseline factors: (1) the mean of the two screening TCD velocity values and (2) participant age at enrolment. Block sizes will be fixed at 4 to maintain equal sample sizes in the two arms within a given site every fourth randomisation. Random block size was not employed due to the small number of participants excepted at each clinical site. Assignment within a given block of four will be randomly ordered and will vary from block to block. The first 8 participants to be randomised will be assigned to a treatment arm based on the site‐specific unconstrained random allocation scheme.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

From appendix: this process assures that the differences in mean baseline age and mean baseline TCD velocity between the two arms, after the participant’s randomisation, do not exceed a critical value determined by a statistical probability distribution.

Adaptive randomisation and trial‐wide imbalance constraints and other constraints appear to ensure that allocation is statistically determined.

Randomisation was done centrally, stratified by site with a block size of four, and we used an adaptive randomisation scheme to balance the covariates of baseline age and TCD velocity.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Participants and personnel are unblinded.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Stroke and TIA

Low risk

TCD examinations were done just before transfusions or phlebotomy, and all were read centrally by observers masked to treatment assignment and previous TCD results. All new potential stroke events were assessed with careful neurological evaluation and brain MRI or MRA examinations, then adjudicated centrally by a panel of expert reviewers. Independent and then consensus opinions were obtained from neurologists and neuroradiologists masked to trial treatment. Brain MRI/MRA examinations at trial exit allowed us to confirm that no strokes had been missed by the adjudication process.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes apart from stroke or all‐cause mortality

High risk

Unblinded trial.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

All randomised participants included in safety and efficacy analysis Transfusion arm: 0 lost to follow‐up, 8 discontinued intervention, 3 adjudicated TIA, 1 TCD velocity > 240 cm/s 2 non‐adherence 1 difficulty finding matched blood 1 chose to withdraw hydroxyurea arm: 6 discontinued intervention 3 adjudicated transient Ischaemic attack 3 non‐adherence.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Some outcomes will be reported in future papers.

Other bias

Unclear risk

Children with severe vasculopathy were excluded from TWiTCH trial during screening, so these children might not be suitable candidates for hydroxyurea.

Mean age of the trial participants was slightly older than the peak age for primary stroke (about 5 ‐ 6 years), yet still within the published range.

The duration of hydroxyurea therapy without transfusions was relatively short; longer follow‐up is clearly needed to establish whether these findings are maintained over time.

Trial stopped early based on TCD velocities, an accepted surrogate for primary stroke risk in children with sickle cell anaemia, still be some uncertainty with regards to effectiveness for stroke prevention in certain populations and over time.

After full enrolment and when 37% of the participants had exited the trial, the first scheduled interim analysis showed that the stopping boundary had been passed and non‐inferiority was shown. After 50% of participants had exited, repeat analyses supported these findings and the trial was terminated by NHLBI. Remaining participants then completed all exit studies before discontinuing protocol‐directed trial treatment. In total, the standard group included 42 participants who completed trial treatment, 11 who had truncated treatment, and eight who exited early; the alternative group included 41 participants who completed treatment, 13 who had truncated treatment, and 6 who exited early.

DSMB: Data and Safety Monitoring Board
HbS: sickle haemoglobin
HbSβºThal: sickle beta‐zero thalassaemia
HbSS: homozygous sickle cell disease
ITT: intention‐to‐treat
MRA: magnetic resonance angiography
MRI: magnetic resonance imaging
MTD: maximum tolerated dose
RBC: red blood cells
RCT: randomised controlled trial
SCI: silent cerebral infarct
SD: standard deviation
TCD: transcranial Doppler ultrasonography
TIA: transient Ischaemic attack

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Bernaudin 2015

Not a randomised trial.

SCATE 2015

No red blood cell transfusion arm; hydroxyurea versus observation.

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Blood transfusion versus standard care

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical stroke Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 1 Clinical stroke.

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 1 Clinical stroke.

1.1 No previous long‐term red cell transfusions

2

326

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.03, 0.49]

1.2 Previous long‐term red cell transfusions

1

79

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.01, 4.35]

2 Clinical stroke ‐ velocity Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 2 Clinical stroke ‐ velocity.

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 2 Clinical stroke ‐ velocity.

2.1 Normal TCD velocities and no previous long‐term red cell transfusions

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Normalised TCD velocities and previous long‐term red cell transfusions

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 Abnormal TCD velocities

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Clinical stroke ‐ SCI Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 3 Clinical stroke ‐ SCI.

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 3 Clinical stroke ‐ SCI.

3.1 Presence of previous SCI on MRI

2

243

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.02, 0.59]

3.2 Absence of previous SCI on MRI

1

79

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.03, 2.31]

4 Mortality Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 4 Mortality.

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 4 Mortality.

5 Transfusion‐related adverse events Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 5 Transfusion‐related adverse events.

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 5 Transfusion‐related adverse events.

5.1 Alloimmunisation ‐ No previous long‐term red cell transfusions

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Transfusion reactions ‐ No previous long‐term red cell transfusion

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 TIA Show forest plot

2

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 6 TIA.

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 6 TIA.

6.1 No previous long‐term red cell transfusions

2

323

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.01, 2.11]

7 Other sickle cell related complications Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 7 Other sickle cell related complications.

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 7 Other sickle cell related complications.

7.1 Acute chest syndrome

2

326

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.12, 0.48]

7.2 Painful crises

2

326

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.46, 0.84]

7.3 Priapism

1

111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.02, 0.99]

7.4 Avascular necrosis of the hip

1

196

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.16 [0.02, 1.33]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical stroke ‐ Secondary prevention Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 1 Clinical stroke ‐ Secondary prevention.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 1 Clinical stroke ‐ Secondary prevention.

2 Mortality Show forest plot

2

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 2 Mortality.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 2 Mortality.

2.1 Mortality ‐ Primary prevention

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Mortality ‐ Secondary prevention

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Transfusion‐related complications ‐ Serum ferritin; Primary prevention Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 3 Transfusion‐related complications ‐ Serum ferritin; Primary prevention.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 3 Transfusion‐related complications ‐ Serum ferritin; Primary prevention.

4 Transfusion related complications ‐ Liver iron concentration ‐ Primary prevention Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 4 Transfusion related complications ‐ Liver iron concentration ‐ Primary prevention.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 4 Transfusion related complications ‐ Liver iron concentration ‐ Primary prevention.

5 Other neurological event Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 5 Other neurological event.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 5 Other neurological event.

5.1 TIA ‐ Primary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 TIA ‐ Secondary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Other sickle cell related complications Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 6 Other sickle cell related complications.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 6 Other sickle cell related complications.

6.1 Total SCD‐related SAEs ‐ Secondary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Acute chest syndrome ‐ Primary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.3 Acute chest syndrome ‐ Secondary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.4 Painful crisis ‐ Primary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.5 Painful crisis ‐ Secondary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.6 Infections and infestations SAEs ‐ Primary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.7 Infections and infestations SAEs ‐ Secondary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Haemoglobin levels Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 7 Haemoglobin levels.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 7 Haemoglobin levels.

8 Haemoglobin S levels Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 8 Haemoglobin S levels.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 8 Haemoglobin S levels.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 1 Clinical stroke.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 1 Clinical stroke.

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 2 Clinical stroke ‐ velocity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 2 Clinical stroke ‐ velocity.

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 3 Clinical stroke ‐ SCI.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 3 Clinical stroke ‐ SCI.

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 4 Mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 4 Mortality.

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 5 Transfusion‐related adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 5 Transfusion‐related adverse events.

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 6 TIA.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 6 TIA.

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 7 Other sickle cell related complications.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Blood transfusion versus standard care, Outcome 7 Other sickle cell related complications.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 1 Clinical stroke ‐ Secondary prevention.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 1 Clinical stroke ‐ Secondary prevention.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 2 Mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 2 Mortality.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 3 Transfusion‐related complications ‐ Serum ferritin; Primary prevention.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 3 Transfusion‐related complications ‐ Serum ferritin; Primary prevention.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 4 Transfusion related complications ‐ Liver iron concentration ‐ Primary prevention.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 4 Transfusion related complications ‐ Liver iron concentration ‐ Primary prevention.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 5 Other neurological event.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 5 Other neurological event.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 6 Other sickle cell related complications.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 6 Other sickle cell related complications.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 7 Haemoglobin levels.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 7 Haemoglobin levels.

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 8 Haemoglobin S levels.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation), Outcome 8 Haemoglobin S levels.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Long‐term red cell transfusion versus no transfusion in people who are at risk of a primary stroke who have not had previous long‐term red cell transfusions

Primary prevention

Patient or population: individuals with sickle cell disease who are at risk of a primary stroke who have not had previous long‐term red cell transfusions
Setting: outpatients
Intervention: long‐term red cell transfusion
Comparison: standard care

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(trials)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with standard care

Risk with Blood transfusion

Clinical stroke

follow‐up: mean 24 months

Trial population

RR 0.12
(0.03 to 0.49)

326
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate 3

110 per 1000

13 per 1000

(3 to 54)

All‐cause mortality

No deaths occurred in either trial arm

326
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low 1 2 3

Adverse events associated with transfusion
assessed with: alloimmunisation

Moderatea

RR 3.16
(0.18 to 57.17)

121
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low 2 3 4

10 per 1000

32 per 1000

(2 to 572)

TIA

Trial population

Peto OR 0.13

(0.01 to 2.11)

323

(2 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low 3 4

21 per 1000

5 per 1000

(0 to 43)

Serious adverse events as a result of sickle cell‐related complications
assessed with: ACS

Trial population

RR 0.24
(0.12 to 0.48)

326
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low 2 3

232 per 1,000

56 per 1000

(28 to 111)

Moderate

230 per 1000

55 per 1000

(28 to 110)

Measures of neurological impairment assessed with: WASI IQ score

Least square mean 1.7

(SE 95% CI ‐1.1 to 4.4)

166

(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low 2 3

Author reported data from SIT 2014

Quality of life

assessed with: Child Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50

Difference estimate ‐0.54 (‐0.92 to ‐0.17)

196

(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low 2 3

Author reported data from SIT 2014

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

Abbreviations: ACS: acute chest syndrome; CI: confidence interval; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio; OR: odds ratio; TIA: transient ischaemic attack.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 We downgraded the quality of evidence by 1 due to imprecision. Rare event. No deaths occurred.

2 We downgraded the quality of the evidence by 1 due to risk of bias. Unblinded trial and cross‐overs, and imbalance between loss to follow‐up between trial arms

3 We downgraded the quality of the evidence by 1 due to indirectness. Only children with HbSS or HbSβº thalassaemia included in trials

4 We downgraded the quality of evidence by 2 due to imprecision. The estimate has very wide CIs

a Based on Chou 2013

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Long‐term red cell transfusion versus no transfusion in people who are at risk of a primary stroke who have not had previous long‐term red cell transfusions
Summary of findings 2. Long‐term red cell transfusion versus no transfusion in people who are at risk of a primary stroke who have had previous long‐term red cell transfusions

Primary prevention

Patient or population: individuals with sickle cell disease who are at risk of a primary stroke who have had long‐term red cell transfusions to prevent a stroke
Setting: outpatients
Intervention: long‐term red cell transfusion
Comparison: halted transfusion

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(trials)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with standard care

Risk with blood transfusion

Clinical stroke

follow‐up: mean 24 months

Trial population

RR 0.22

(0.01 to 4.35)

79
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low 1 2 3

49 per 1000

11 per 1000

(0 to 212)

All‐cause mortality

Moderatea

Peto OR 8.00 (0.16 to 404.12)

79
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low 1 2 3

10 per 1000

75 per 1000

(2 to 803)

Adverse events associated with transfusion
assessed with: alloimmunisation

See comment

79

(1 RCT)

No comparative numbers reported

TIA

See comment

79

(1 RCT)

No comparative numbers reported

Serious adverse events as a result of sickle cell‐related complications assessed with: ACS

See comment

79

(1 RCT)

No comparative numbers reported

Measures of neurological impairment ‐ not reported

Outcome not reported

Quality of life ‐ not reported

Outcome not reported

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

Abbreviations: ACS: acute chest syndrome; CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; OR: odds ratio; TIA: transient ischaemic attack

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 We did not downgrade the evidence due to risk of bias because the evidence was already very low grade evidence. There was attrition bias. Imbalance between loss to follow‐up between trial arms

2 We downgraded the quality of the evidence by 1 due to indirectness. Only children with HbSS or HbSβº thalassaemia included in trials

3 We downgraded the quality of evidence by 2 due to imprecision. The estimate has very wide CIs

a Assuming a mortality rate of 1%

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Long‐term red cell transfusion versus no transfusion in people who are at risk of a primary stroke who have had previous long‐term red cell transfusions
Summary of findings 3. Long‐term red cell transfusion versus hydroxyurea and phlebotomy in people who are at risk of a primary stroke who have had previous long‐term red cell transfusions

Primary prevention

Patient or population: individuals with sickle cell disease who are at risk of a primary stroke who have had long‐term red cell transfusions to prevent a stroke
Setting: outpatient
Intervention: blood transfusion with iron chelation
Comparison: hydroxyurea with phlebotomy

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(trials)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with hydroxyurea and phlebotomy

Risk with Blood transfusion

Clinical stroke

No strokes occurred in either trial arm

121

(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low 1 2

All‐cause mortality

No deaths occurred in either trial arm

121

(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low 1 2

Adverse events associated

with transfusion
assessed with: Liver iron concentration mg Fe/g dry weight liver

The mean liver iron concentration was

9.5 mg Fe/g dry weight

MD 1.8 mg Fe/g dry weight lower

(5.16 lower to 1.56 higher)

121

(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low2 3

Switching to hydroxyurea and phlebotomy may reduce serum ferritin levels compared to continuing to receive red cell transfusions and chelation (MD) ‐1398 μg/L, 95% CI ‐1929 to ‐867; one trial, 121 participants)

Incidence of TIA

49 per 1000

50 per 1,000

(10 to 238)

RR 1.02 (0.21 to 4.84)

121

(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low 2 3 4

Serious adverse events as a result of sickle cell‐related complications
assessed with: ACS

Trial population

RR 2.03 (0.39 to 10.69)

121

(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low 2 3 4

33 per 1000

67 per 1,000

(13 to 350)

Measures of neurological impairment ‐ not reported

Outcome not reported

Quality of life ‐ not reported

Outcome not reported

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

Abbreviations: ACS: acute chest syndrome; CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; OR: odds ratio; TIA: transient ischaemic attack.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 We downgraded the quality of the evidence by 2 due to imprecision. Rare event. No deaths or stroke occurred.

2 We downgraded the quality of the evidence by 1 due to indirectness. Only children with HbSS or HbSβº thalassaemia included in trials

3 We downgraded the quality of the evidence by 1 due to risk of bias.Trial was not blinded and stopped early

4 We downgraded the quality of the evidence by 1 due to imprecision. The estimate has very wide CIs

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Long‐term red cell transfusion versus hydroxyurea and phlebotomy in people who are at risk of a primary stroke who have had previous long‐term red cell transfusions
Summary of findings 4. Long‐term red cell transfusion versus hydroxyurea and phlebotomy in people who are at risk of a secondary stroke who have had previous long‐term red cell transfusions

Secondary prevention

Patient or population: individuals with sickle cell disease who have had a stroke who have had long‐term red cell transfusions to prevent another stroke
Setting: outpatients
Intervention: blood transfusion with iron chelation
Comparison: hydroxyurea with phlebotomy

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(trials)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with hydroxyurea and phlebotomy

Risk with Blood transfusion

Clinical stroke
assessed with: no previous red cell transfusion
follow‐up: mean 24 months

Trial population

RR 14.78
(0.86 to 253.66)

133

(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low 1 2 3

0 per 1000

0 per 1000

(0 to 0)

All‐cause mortality

15 per 1000

15 per 1000

(1 to 198)

Peto OR 0.98

(0.06 to 15.92)

133

(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low 1 2 3

Transfusion‐related adverse events ‐ assessed with liver iron concentration mg Fe/g dry weight liver

Hydroxyurea arm: median 17.2 mg

IQR 10.0 to 30.6

Transfusion arm: median 17.3 mg

IQR 8.8 to 30.7

56

(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low 1 2

P = 0.7920a

Switching to hydroxyurea and phlebotomy may reduce serum ferritin levels compared to continuing to receive red cell transfusions and chelation 1994 μg/L, interquartile range (IQR) 998 to 3475, in the hydroxyurea arm and 4064 μg/L, IQR 2330 to 7126, in the transfusion arm; one trial, 133 participants; P < 0.001 a

Incidence of TIA

Trial population

RR 0.66
(0.25 to 1.74)

133

(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low 1 2 3

136 per 1000

90 per 1000

(34 to 237)

Serious adverse events as a result of sickle cell‐related complications
assessed with: ACS

Trial population

RR 0.33

(0.04 to 3.08)

133

(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low1 2 3

45 per 1000

15 per 1000

(2 to 140)

Measures of neurological impairment ‐ not reported

Outcome not reported

Quality of life ‐ not reported

Outcome not reported

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

Abbreviations: ACS: acute chest syndrome; CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; OR: odds ratio; TIA: transient ischaemic attack

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 We downgraded the quality of the evidence by 1 due to risk of bias. Trial was not blinded and stopped early

2 We downgraded the quality of the evidence by 1 due to indirectness. Only children with HbSS or HbSβº thalassaemia included in trials

3 We downgraded the quality of the evidence by 1 due to imprecision. The estimate has very wide CIs

a Analysis performed by the trial authors

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 4. Long‐term red cell transfusion versus hydroxyurea and phlebotomy in people who are at risk of a secondary stroke who have had previous long‐term red cell transfusions
Table 1. Adverse events per 100 person‐years and incidence rate ratios for transfusion‐related complications

Outcomes

Trials

Number of participants with at least one event

Adverse events/100 person‐years

Incidence rate ratioc

(95% CI)

Transfusion

Standard

Transfusion

Standard

Transfusion reactions

SIT 2014

15 out of 90a

1 out of 31b

8.85

1.66

5.33

(1.67 to 23.52)

Ferritin > 1500 μg/L

SIT 2014

76 out of 90a

3 out of 31b

534.70

37.07

14.42

(5.41 to 85.17)

aNine participants who declined transfusion were excluded from the analysis.
b31 participants assigned to observation received one or more transfusions.
cThe incidence ratio was calculated as the rate of adverse events per 100 person‐years in the transfusion group divided by the rate of adverse events per 100 person‐years in the observation group. The 95% confidence intervals were calculated with the use of the bootstrap method with 10,000 replications.

Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Adverse events per 100 person‐years and incidence rate ratios for transfusion‐related complications
Table 2. Adverse events per 100 person years and incidence rate ratios for SCD complications

Outcomes

Trials

Number of participants with at least one event

Adverse events/100 person‐years

Incidence rate ratioa

(95% CI)

Transfusion

Standard

Transfusion

Standard

Acute chest syndrome

STOP 1998

4 out of 63

14 out of 67

4.8b

15.3b

SIT 2014

5 out of 99

24 out of 97

1.81b

14.35b

0.41

(0.20 to 0.75)

Painful crisis

STOP 1998

11 out of 63

13 out of 67

16.2

27.6

SIT 2014

32 out of 99

56 out of 97

41.58

102.21

0.13

(0.04 to 0.28)

Priapism

SIT 2014

1 out of 59

7 out of 52

0.84

6.65

0.13

(0.03 to 0.55)

Symptomatic avascular necrosis of the hip

SIT 2014

1 out of 99

6 out of 97

0.4

2.25

0.22

(0.05 to 0.85)

a The incidence ratio was calculated as the rate of adverse events per 100 person‐years in the transfusion group divided by the rate of adverse events per 100 person‐years in the observation group. The 95% confidence intervals were calculated with the use of the bootstrap method with 10,000 replications.

b One child from the standard care group was excluded from these analyses due to a stroke on day 16 of the trial.

Abbreviation: CI: confidence interval

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Adverse events per 100 person years and incidence rate ratios for SCD complications
Table 3. Mean or median haemoglobin (Hb) levels and HbS percentage

Trial

Intervention

Baseline

6 to 12 months

12 to 18 months

18 to 24 months

Hb (g/L)

Hb S (%)

Hb (g/L)

Hb S (%)

Hb (g/L)

Hb S (%)

Hb (g/L)

Hb S (%)

No previous long‐term transfusions

SIT 2014

Transfusion

Median 77

IQR (72 to 84)

Median 85

90% CI

(51 to 95)

Median 30

90% CI

(17 to 43)

Median 29

90% CI

(16 to 43)

Median 30

90% CI

(16 to 43)

Standard

Median 79

IQR (74 to 89)

STOP 1998

Transfusion

Mean (SD) 72 (8)

Mean (SD) 87 (10)

Standard

Mean (SD) 76 (7)

Mean (SD) 87 (7)

Previous long‐term transfusions

STOP 2 2005

Transfusion

Mean (SD)

93 (9)

Mean (SD)

21 (8.6)

Mean (SD)

94 (9)

Mean (SD)

25.4 (10.9)

Standard

Mean (SD)

98 (12)

Mean (SD)

19 (11)

Mean (SD)

77 (8)

Mean (SD)

81.0 (8.6)

Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; IQR: interquartile range; SD: standard deviation

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Mean or median haemoglobin (Hb) levels and HbS percentage
Table 4. Pre‐transfusion Haemoglobin S levels

Trial

Number of transfusions

Number of HbS levels measured

HbS less than 30%

HbS 30 to 40%

HbS greater than 40%

No previous long‐term transfusions

STOP 1998

1521

101

42

Previous long‐term transfusions

STOP 2 2005

1070

988

748 (76%)

192 (19%)

48 (5%)

Figuras y tablas -
Table 4. Pre‐transfusion Haemoglobin S levels
Comparison 1. Blood transfusion versus standard care

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical stroke Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 No previous long‐term red cell transfusions

2

326

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.03, 0.49]

1.2 Previous long‐term red cell transfusions

1

79

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.01, 4.35]

2 Clinical stroke ‐ velocity Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Normal TCD velocities and no previous long‐term red cell transfusions

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Normalised TCD velocities and previous long‐term red cell transfusions

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 Abnormal TCD velocities

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Clinical stroke ‐ SCI Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Presence of previous SCI on MRI

2

243

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.02, 0.59]

3.2 Absence of previous SCI on MRI

1

79

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.03, 2.31]

4 Mortality Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5 Transfusion‐related adverse events Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Alloimmunisation ‐ No previous long‐term red cell transfusions

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Transfusion reactions ‐ No previous long‐term red cell transfusion

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 TIA Show forest plot

2

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 No previous long‐term red cell transfusions

2

323

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.01, 2.11]

7 Other sickle cell related complications Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Acute chest syndrome

2

326

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.12, 0.48]

7.2 Painful crises

2

326

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.46, 0.84]

7.3 Priapism

1

111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.02, 0.99]

7.4 Avascular necrosis of the hip

1

196

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.16 [0.02, 1.33]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Blood transfusion versus standard care
Comparison 2. Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical stroke ‐ Secondary prevention Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Mortality Show forest plot

2

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Mortality ‐ Primary prevention

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Mortality ‐ Secondary prevention

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Transfusion‐related complications ‐ Serum ferritin; Primary prevention Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4 Transfusion related complications ‐ Liver iron concentration ‐ Primary prevention Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5 Other neurological event Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 TIA ‐ Primary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 TIA ‐ Secondary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Other sickle cell related complications Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Total SCD‐related SAEs ‐ Secondary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Acute chest syndrome ‐ Primary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.3 Acute chest syndrome ‐ Secondary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.4 Painful crisis ‐ Primary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.5 Painful crisis ‐ Secondary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.6 Infections and infestations SAEs ‐ Primary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.7 Infections and infestations SAEs ‐ Secondary prevention

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Haemoglobin levels Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

8 Haemoglobin S levels Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Hydroxyurea and phlebotomy versus standard treatment (transfusions/chelation)