Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Fluticasone versus placebo for chronic asthma in adults and children

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

Agertoft 1997 {published data only}

Agertoft L, Pedersen S. Short‐term knemometry and urine cortisol excretion in children treated with fluticasone propionate and budesonide: a dose response study. European Respiratory Journal 1997;10(7):1507‐12.

Allen 1998 {published data only}

Allen DB, Bronsky EA, LaForce CF, Nathan RA, Tinkelman DG, Vandewalker ML, Konig P. Growth in asthmatic children treated with fluticasone propionate. Fluticasone Propionate Asthma Study Group. Journal of Pediatrics 1998;132(3 Pt 1):472‐7.
Konig P, Ford L, Galant S, Lawrence M, Lemanske R, Mendelson L, et al. A 1‐year comparison of the effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) and placebo on growth in pre‐pubescent children with asthma. European Respiratory Journal. 1996; Vol. 9, issue Suppl:S294.
Mahajan P, Pearlman D, Okamoto L. The effect of fluticasone propionate on functional status and sleep in children with asthma and on the quality of life of their parents. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 1998;102(1):19‐23.

Allen 2000 {published data only}

Allen T, Wire P, Wolford J, Harding S. Fluticasone propionate (FP) via the diskus device maintained prednisone reduction beyond one year. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2000;161(3 Suppl):A185.

Arets 2002 {unpublished data only}

Arets HGM, Kamps AWA, Brackel HJL, Mulder PGH, Vermue NA, van der Ent CK. Children with mild asthma: do they benefit from inhaled corticosteroids. European Respiratory Journal 2002;20(6):1470‐5.
Arets HGM, Kamps AWA, Brackel HJL, Mulder PGH, Vermue NAV, van der Ent CK. Children with mild asthma:do they benefit from inhaled corticosteroids?. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A768.

Berger 2002 BD {published data only}

Berger WE, Ford LB, Mahr T, Nathan RA, Crim C, Edwards L, et al. Efficacy and safety of fluticasione propionate 250ug administered once daily in patients with persistent asthma treated with or without inhaled corticosteroids. Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 2002;89(4):393‐9.

Berger 2002 ICS {published data only}

Berger WE, Ford LB, Mahr T, Nathan RA, Crim C, Edwards L, et al. Efficacy and safety of fluticasione propionate 250ug administered once daily in patients with persistent asthma treated with or without inhaled corticosteroids. Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 2002;89(4):393‐9.

Boonsawat 2004 {unpublished data only}

SAS30023. www.clinicalstudyresults.org.
Boonsawat W, Goryachkina L, Millns H, Balsara S. The efficacy and safety of seretide/advair once daily (50/100 mcg) compared with fluticasone propionate (100mcg) once daily and placeboas initial maintainence therapy in mild asthma [Abstract]. American Thoracic Society 100th International Conference, Orlando, May 21‐26. 2004:A37 Poster J82.
Goryachkina L, Boonsawat W, Millns H, Balsara S. Seretide/Advair 50/100mcg once daily is effective in patients with mild asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2004;169(7):A86.

Busse 2001 {published data only}

Bowers BW, Johnson M, Edwards L, Srebro S, Rickard K. The impact of fluticasone propionate and zafirlukast on patient quality of life. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. 1999; Vol. 159:A761.
Busse W, Wolfe J, Storms W, Srebro S, Edwards L, Johnson M, et al. Fluticasone propionate compared with zafirlukast in controlling perssitent asthma; a randomized double‐blind, placebo controlled trial. The Journal of Family Practice 2001;50(7):595‐602.
Busse WW, Srebro SH, Edwards L, Johnson MC, Rickard K. Low‐dose inhaled fluticasone propionate versus oral zafirlukast in asthma patients. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. 1999; Vol. 159:A628.
Creticos P, Knobil K, Edwards L, Rickard KA, Dorinsky P. Loss of response to treatment with leukotriene receptor antagonists but not inhaled corticosteroids in patients over 50 years of age. Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 2002;88(4):401‐9.
Rickard K, Srebro SH, Edwards L, Johnson MC. Inhaled fluticasone versus oral zafirlukast in asthma patients. European Respiratory Journal. 1999:122S.

Casale 2001 {published data only}

Casale T B, Nelson HS, Stricker WE, Raff H, Newman KB. Suppression of hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis activity with inhaled flunisolide and fluticasone propionate in adult asthma patients. Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 2001;87(5):379‐85.
Casale TB, Nelson HS, Stricker W, Fourre JA, Newman KB. Dose response of the effect of inhale fluticasone and flunisolide on endogenous cortisol secretion. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2000;161(3 Suppl):A776.

Chervinsky 1994 {published data only}

Chervinsky P, van As A, Bronsky EA, Dockhorn R, Noonan M, LaForce C, Pleskow W. Fluticasone propionate aerosol for the treatment of adults with mild to moderate asthma. The Fluticasone Propionate Asthma Study Group. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 1994;94(4):676‐83.

Condemi 1997 {published data only}

Condemi JJ, Chervinsky P, Glodstein MF, Ford LB, Berger WE, Ayars GH, et al. Fluticasone propionate powder administered through Diskhaler versus triamcinolone acetonide aerosol administered thorugh metered‐dose inhlaer in patients with persistent asthma. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 1997;100:467‐74.
Cox F, Goodwin B, Cohen R, Rogenes P, Wisniewski M. Improvement in general quality of life for asthmatics receiving inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) 500 µg/day versus triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) 800 µg/day or placebo (PL) [abstract]. European Respiratory Journal 1996;9(Suppl 23):80s.
Goodwin B, Cox F, Noonan M, Rogenes P, Wisnieski M. The impact of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) 500mcg/d versus Triamcinalone acetonide (TAA) 800mcg/d or placebo on general quality of life in adult asthmatics. European Respiratory Journal 1996;9(Suppl 23):80s.
Goodwin B, Cox F, Noonan M, Rogenes P, Wisniewski M. Inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) 500 µg/day improves asthma‐specific quality of life more than triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) 800 µg/day or placebo (PL). European Respiratory Journal 1996;9(Suppl 23):80s.

Convery 2000 {published data only}

Convery RP, Leitch DN, Bromly C, Ward RJ, Bartlett G, Hendrick DJ. Effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate on airway responsiveness in treatment‐naïve individuals ‐ a lesser benefit in females. European Respiratory Journal 2000;15(1):19‐24.

Corsico 2000 {published data only}

Corsico A, Pellegrino R, Zoia MC, Barbano L, Brusaco V, Cerveri I. Effects of inhaled steroids on methacholine‐induced bronchoconstriction and gas tapping in mild asthma. European Respiratory Journal 2000;15(4):687‐92.

Derom 1999 {published data only}

Derom E, van Schoor J, Verhaege W, Vincken W, Pauwels R. Systemic effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide in adult patients with asthma. American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine 1999;160:157‐61.

Derom 2001 {published data only}

Derom E, Van De Velde V, Marissens S, Vincken W, Pauwels RA. Efficacy and systemic effects of ciclesonide and fluticasone in asthma patients. European Respiratory Journal 2001;18(Suppl 33):147s.
Pauwels RA, Derom E, Van De Velde V, Marissens S, Vincken W. Effects of inhaled ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate on cortisol secretion and PC²° for adenosine in asthma patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A768.

Dorinsky 2004 {unpublished data only}

Dorinsky P, Kerwin E, Schoaf L, Ellsworth A, House KM. The effectiveness and safety of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50mcg administered once daily to patients with persistent asthma. www.clinicalstudyresults.org.
Dorinsky P, Schoaf L, House K, Ellsworth A. The efficacy and safety of FP/salmeterol 250/50mcg once daily compared with FP/salmeterol 100/50mcg twice daily. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2004;169(7):A149.
Dorinsky P, Schoaf L, House KM, VanderMeer A. The safety and effectiveness of once daily administration of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50mcg. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 2004;113(2):Abstract No: 67.
SAS30022. A randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel group, 12‐week trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the fluticasone propionate/salmeterol DISKUS combination product 250/50mcg once daily versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol DISKUS combination product 100/50mcg twice daily versus fluticasone propionate 250mcg once daily in symptomatic adolescent and adult subjects with asthma that is not controlled on short acting beta2‐agonists alone. www.clinicalstudyresults.org.

Ekroos 1999 {published data only}

Ekroos H, Lindqvist A, Saarinen T, Poussa T, Haahtela T, Laitinen LA, Sorvijarvi ARA. Significant association with the decrease of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and the decrease of exhaled nitric oxide after starting inhaled fluticasone in mild asthma. European Respiratory Journal. 1999; Vol. 14, issue Suppl 30:171S.
Ekroos HJ, Sovijarvi ARA, Lindqvist A, Saarinen A, Poussa T, Haahtela T, Laitinen LA. Short‐term effect of fluticasone propionate on exhaled nitric oxide in mild asthma. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. 1999; Vol. 159:A628.
Sovijarvi ARA, Ekroos H, Lindqvist A, Saarinen A, Poussa T, Haahtela T, Laitnen LA. Short‐term effect of fluticasone propionate on bronchial hyperresponsiveness to histamine diphosphate in mild asthma; significant effect within three days. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. 1999; Vol. 159:A629.

Falcoz 2000 {published data only}

Falcoz C, Horton J, Mackie A, Harding S, Daley‐Yates PT. Pharmacokinetics of fluticasone propionate inhaled via the diskhaler and diskus powder devices in patients with mild‐to‐moderate asthma. Cinical Pharmacokinetics 2000;39(Suppl 1):31‐7.

Faul 1998 {published data only}

Faul JL, Leonard CT, Burke CM, Tormey VJ, Poulter LW. Fluticasone propionate induced alterations to lung function and the immunopathology of asthma over time. Thorax 1998;53(9):753‐61.
Faul JL, Leonard CT, Burke CM, Tormey VJ, Poulter LW. Fluticasone propionate‐induced alterations to lung function and the immunopathology of asthma over time. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1998;157(Suppl 3):A870.

Galant 1996 {published data only}

Galant SP, Lawrence M, Meltzer EO, Tomasko M, Baker KA, Kellerman DJ. Fluticasone propionate compared with theophylline for mild‐to‐moderate asthma. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 1996;77(2):112‐8.

Galant 1999 {published data only}

Galant SP, van Bavel J, Finn A, Gross G, Pleskow W, Brown A, et al. Diskus and diskhaler: efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate via two dry powder inhalers in subjects with mild‐to‐moderate persistent asthma. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 1999;82(3):273‐80.
Hampel F, Van Bavel J, Selner J, Gross G, Brown A, Hamedani A, et al. Inhaled fluticasone propionate administered via the Diskus or Diskhaler is safe and effective in adolescent and adult subjects with mild to moderate asthma. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. 1996; Vol. 153:A338.
Mahajan P, Okamoto L. Patient satisfaction with the Diskhaler (R) and the Diskus (R) inhaler, a new multidose powder delivery system for the treatment of asthma. Clinical Therapeutics 1997;19(5):1126‐34. [MEDLINE: EMBASE 97368535; CN‐00233390]

Giannini 2003 {published data only}

Giannini D, Di Franco A, Bacci E, Bartoli ML, Carnevali S, Cianchetti S, et al. Different doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate FP in the management of moderate asthmatic subjects. Annual Thoracic Society 97th International Conference; San Francisco CA, May 18‐23 2001.
Giannini D, Di Franco A, Tonelli M, Bartoli ML, Carnevali S, Cianchetti S. Fifty mg b.i.d. of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) are effective in stable asthmatics previously treated with a higher dose of FP. Respiratory Medicine 2003;97(5):463‐7.

Given 2004 {published data only}

Given J, Kent E, Gossage D, Clements D, Scott C, Wu W, Crim C. Safety of fluticasone propionate HFA in treating children 4‐11 years of age with asthma [Abstract]. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2004;113(Suppl 2):112s.
Levy A, Condemi J, Landwehr L, Clements D, Scott C, Wu W, Crim C. Fluticasone propionate HFA improves asthma control children aged 4 to 11 years with asthma [Abstract]. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2004;113(Suppl 2):113s.

Hart 2000 {published data only}

Hart L, Lim S, Adcock I, Barnes PJ, Fan Chung K. Effects of inhaled corticosteroid therapy on expression and DNA‐binding activity of nuclear factor kB in asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2000;161:224‐31.

Hoekstra 1996 {published data only}

Hoekstra MO, Grol MH, Bouman K, Stijnen T, Koeter GH, Kauffman HF, Gerritsen J. Fluticasone propionate in children with moderate asthma. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1996;154(4 Pt 1):1039‐44.

Hofstra 2000 {published data only}

Hofstra WB, Neijens HJ, Duiverman EJ, Kouwenberg JM, Mulder PG, Kuethe MC, et al. Dose‐responses over time to inhaled fluticasone propionate treatment of exercise and methacholine‐induced bronchoconstriction in children with asthma. Paediatric Pulmonology 2000;29(6):415‐23.
Hofstra WB, Sterk PJ, Neijens HJ, Kuethe MC, Mulder PGH, Duiverman EJ. The effect of 24 weeks treatment with 100 mcg or 250 mcg b.d. fluticasone propionate in reducing exercise‐induced bronchoconstriction in childhood asthma. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. 1997; Vol. 155, issue 4 (pt 2):A267.

Jayaram 2002 {published data only}

Jayaram L, Pizzichini MMM, Hussack P, Lemiere C, Cartier A, Man SFP, et al. First line anti‐inflammatory treatment for asthma; inhaled steroid or leukotriene antagonist? [Respirology]. 2002 7:A19.

Jeffery 2002 {unpublished data only}

Jeffery PK, Venge P, Gizycki MJ, Egerod I, Dahl R, Faurschou P. Effects of salmeterol on mucosal inflammation in asthma: a placebo‐controlled study. European Respiratory Journal 2002;20(6):1378‐85.

Katz 1998 {published data only}

Katz Y, Lebas FX, Medley HV, Robson R. Fluticasone propionate 50 micrograms BID versus 100 micrograms BID in the treatment of children with persistent asthma. Fluticasone Propionate Study Group. Clinical Therapeutics 1998;20(3):424‐37.

Kavuru 2000 {published and unpublished data}

Edwards T, Gross G, Mitchell D, Chervinsky P, Woodring A, Baitinger L, et al. The salmeterol xinafoate/fluticasone propionate dry powder combination product via diskus(r) inhaler improves asthma control compared to salmeterol xinafoate or fluticasone propionate dry powder alone. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1998;157(3 Suppl):A414.
Kavuru M, Melamed J, Gross G, Laforce C, House K, Prillaman B, et al. Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate combined in a new powder inhalation device for the treatment of asthma: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2000;106(6 (pt 1)):1108‐16.

Kemp 2004 {published data only}

Kemp JP, Osur S, Shrewsbury SB, Herje NE, Duke SP, Harding SM, et al. Potential effects of fluticasone propionate on bone mineral density in patients with asthma: a 2‐year randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2004;79(4):458‐66.
Osur S, Chervinsky P, Herie N, Harding S, Kellerman D. Long term effects of fluticasone propionate (FP) inhalation aerosol in subjects with asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1998;157(Suppl 3):A405.

Laforce 2000 {published data only}

Laforce CF, Pearlman DS, Ruff ME, Silvers WS, Weinstein SW, Clements DS, et al. Efficacy and safety of dry powder fluticasone propionate in children with persistent asthma. Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 2000;85(5):407‐15.

Langley 2002 {published data only}

Langley SJ, Holden J, Derham A, Hedgeland P, Sharma RK, Woodcock A. Fluticasone propionate via the Diskhaler or hydrofluoroalkane‐134a metered‐dose inhaler on methacholine‐induced airway hyperresponsiveness. Chest 2002;122(3):806‐11.

Lanz 2001 {published data only}

Lanz MJ, Eisenlohr C, Llabre MM, Toledo Y, Lanz MA. The effect of low‐dose inhaled fluticasone propionate on exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatic patients and comparison with oral zafirlukast. Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 2001;87(4):283‐8.

Lawrence 1997 {published data only}

Lawrence M, Wolfe J, Webb DR, Chervinsky P, Kellerman D, Schaumberg JP, Shah T. Efficacy of inhaled fluticasone propionate in asthma results from topical and not from systemic activity. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1997;156(3 Pt 1):744‐51.
Nielsen K, Okamoto L, Shah T. Importance of selected inhaler characteristics and acceptance of a new breath‐actuated powder inhalation device. Journal of Asthma 1997;34(3):249‐53.

Li 1999 {published data only}

Li J, Gross G, Osur S, Noonan M, Goldstein M, Sorkness C, et al. A comparison of commonly‐prescribed doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) and inhaled triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) on HPA axis function. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1998;157(Suppl 3):A407.
Li JT, Ford LB, Chervinsky P, Weisberg SC, Kellerman DJ, Faulkner KG, et al. Fluticasone propionate powder and lack of clinically significant effects on hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis and bone mineral density over 2 years in adults with mild asthma. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 1999;103(6):1062‐8.

Li 1999a {published data only}

Li X, Ward C, Thien F, Bish R, Bamford T, Bao X, et al. An antiinflammatory effect of salmeterol, a long‐acting ß2 agonist, assessed in airway biopsies and bronchaolveolar lavage in asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Crtitical Care Medicine 1999;160:1493‐9.
Reid DW, Ward C, Wang N, Zheng L, Bish R, Orsida B, Walters EH. Possible anti‐inflammatory effect of salmeterol against interleukin‐8 and neutrophil activation in asthma in vivo. European Respiratory Journal 2003;21(6):994‐9.

Li 1999b {published data only}

Li JTC, Goldstein MF, Gross GN, Noonan MJ, Weisberg S, Edwards L, et al. Effects of fluticasone propionate, triamcinalone acetonide, prednisolone, and placebo on the hypothalamic‐pituatary axis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 1999;103(4):622‐9.

Lindqvist 2003 {published data only}

Lindqvist A, Karjalainen LA, Kava T, Altraja A, Pulkinnen M, Hulme M, Laitinen A. Salmeterol resolves airway obstruction but does not possess anti‐eosinophil efficacy in newly diagnosed asthma: a randomized, double‐blind, parallel group biopsy study comparing the effects of salmeterol, fluticasone propionate, and disodium cromoglycate. Journal of Allergy and Clinicial Immunology 2003;112(1):23‐8.
Lindqvist AE, Karjalainen EM, Laitinen LA, Kava T, Altraja A, Pulkkinen M, et al. Salmeterol sim, fluticasone propionate fp or disodium cromoglycate dscg in the treatment of newly diagnosed asthma. Annual Thoracic Society 97th International Conference; San Francisco CA, May 18‐23 2001.

Lipworth 2005 {published data only}

Lipworth BJ, Kaliner MA, LaForce CF, Baker JW, Kaiser HB, Amin D, et al. Effect of ciclesonide and fluticasone on hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis function in adults with mild‐to‐moderate persistent asthma. Annals of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology 2005;94(4):465‐72.

MacKenzie 1993 {published data only}

MacKenzie CA. Fluticasone propionate in childhood asthma ‐ efficacy, safety and growth [abstract]. European Respiratory Journal 1990;3(Suppl 10):251s.
MacKenzie CA, Weinberg EG, Tabachnik E, Taylor M, Havnen J, Crescenzi K. A placebo controlled trial of fluticasone propionate in asthmatic children. European Journal of Pediatrics 1993;152(10):856‐60.

Micheletto 2000 {published data only}

Micheletto C, Tognella S, Trevisan F, Pomari C, Dal Negro R. Reduction of exhaled nitric oxide (e‐NO) in mild to moderate asthma after a 4‐wk treatment with fluticasone 250mcg BID. European Respiratory Journal 2000;16(Suppl 31):340s.

Nathan 1999 {published data only}

Nathan R, Woodring A, Baitinger L, Prillaman B, Faris M, House K, Shah T. The salmeterol/fluticasone propionate Diskus combination decreases the incidence of exacerbations compared to treatment with salmeterol or fluticasone propionate alone. European Respiratory Journal. 1999; Vol. 14:123S.

Nathan 2000 {published data only}

Nathan RA, Li JTC, Finn A, Jones R, Payne E, Wolford JP, et al. A dose ranging study of fluticasone propionate administered once daily via multidose powder inhaler to patients with moderate asthma. Chest 2000;118(2):296‐302.

Nelson 1999 {published data only}

Nelson HS, Busse WW, deBoisblanc BP, Berger WE, Noonan MJ, Webb DR, et al. Fluticasone propionate powder: oral corticosteroid‐sparing effect and improved lung function and quality of life in patients with severe chronic asthma. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 1999;103(2 Pt 1):267‐75.
Nimmagadda SR, Spahn JD, Nelson HS, Jenkins J, Szefler SJ, Leung DY. Fluticasone propionate results in improved glucocorticoid receptor binding affinity and reduced oral glucocorticoid requirements in severe asthma. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 1998;81(1):35‐40.

Nielsen 2002 {published data only}

Nielsen K, Herje N, Wu W. Inhaled fluticasone propionate via metered ‐dose inhaler with alternate propellant improves asthma‐related quality of life. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A107.

Noonan 1995 {published data only}

Noonan M, Chervinsky P, Busse WW, Weisberg SC, Pinnas J, de Boisblanc BP, et al. Fluticasone propionate reduces oral prednisone use while it improves asthma control and quality of life. American Journal Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1995;152(5 Pt 1):1467‐73.
Okamoto LJ, Noonan M, DeBoisblanc BP, Kellerman DJ. Fluticasone propionate improves quality of life in patients with asthma requiring oral corticosteroids. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 1996;76(5):455‐61.

Noonan 1998 {published data only}

Noonan MJ, Chervinsky P, Wolfe J, Liddle R, Kellerman DJ, Crescenzi KL. Dose‐related response to inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with methacholine‐induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Journal of Asthma 1998;35(2):153‐64.

O'Shaughnessy 1993 {published data only}

O'Shaughnessy KM, Wellings R, Gillies B, Fuller RW. Differential effects of fluticasone propionate on allergen‐evoked bronchoconstriction and increased urinary leukotriene E4 excretion. American Review of Respiratory Disease 1993;147(6 Pt 1):1472‐6.

Oliveri 1997 {published data only}

Del Donno M, Foresi A, Chetta A, Bertorelli G, Pesci A, Casalini A, et al. Effect of six week treatment with low dose of inhaled fluticasone propionate on airway inflammation in mild asthma [abstract]. European Respiratory Journal 1995;8(Suppl 19):302s.
Oliveri D, Chetta A, Del Donno M, Bertorelli G, Casalini A, Pesci A, et al. Effect of short‐term treatment with low‐dose inhaled fluticasone propionate on airway inflammation and remodeling in mild asthma: a placebo‐controlled study. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1997;155(6):1864‐71.

Overbeek 1996 {published data only}

Overbeek SE, Rijnbeek PR, Vons C, Mulder PG, Hoogsteden HC, Bogaard JM. Effects of fluticasone propionate on methacholine dose‐response curves in nonsmoking atopic asthmatics. European Respiratory Journal 1996;9(11):2256‐62.

Parameswaren 2000 {published data only}

Parameswaren K, Inman MD, Watson RM, Moris MM, Efthimiadis A, Ventresca PG, et al. Protective effects of fluticasone on allergen‐induced airway responses and sputum inflammatory markers. Canadian Respiratory Journal 2000;7(4):313‐9.

Pauwels 2002 {published data only}

Pauwels RA, Derom E, Van De Velde V, Marissens S, Vincken W. Effects of inhaled ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate on cortisol secretion and PC²° for adenosine in asthma patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A768.

Pearlman 1997 {published data only}

Mahajan P, Okamoto LJ, Schaberg A, Kellerman D, Schoenwetter WF. Impact of fluticasone propionate powder on health‐related quality of life in patients with moderate asthma. Journal of Asthma 1997;34(3):227‐34.
Pearlman DS, Noonan MJ, Tashkin DP, Goldstein MF, Hamedani AG, Kellerman DJ, Schaberg A. Comparative efficacy and safety of twice daily fluticasone propionate powder versus placebo in the treatment of moderate asthma. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 1997;78(4):356‐62.

Pearlman 1999 {published data only}

Pearlman DS, Stricker W, Weinstein S, Gross G, Chervinsky P, Woodring A, et al. Inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone: a study comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in asthma. Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 1999;82(3):257‐65.

Pearlman 2002 {unpublished data only}

Pearlman D, Kerwin E, Kim K, Murray A, Fischer T, Wu W, et al. Fluticasone prorionate HFA‐134 A significantly improves asthma control in inhaled corticosteroid dependent asthmatics. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A770.

Pearlman 2004 {published and unpublished data}

Pearlman DS, Peden D, Condemi JJ, Weinstein S, White M, Baitinger L, et al. Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol HFA 134A MDI in patients with mild‐to‐moderate persistent asthma. Journal of Asthma 2004;41(8):797‐806.
Weinstein SF, Pearlman DS, Condemi JJ, Herrle MR, Scott CA, Payne JE, et al. Superior efficacy of the fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 88/42mcg HFA‐MDI combination product versus the individual components in asthmatics previously treated with either short‐ or long‐acting beta2‐agonists or inhaled corticosteroids.. Journal of Allergy & Clinial Immunology 2001;107(2):S102.

Peden 1998 {published data only}

Noonan M, Berger W, Thomas R, Pinnas A, Nayak A, Hendricks V, et al. Inhaled fluticasone propionate dry powder administered via Diskus or Diskhaler is safe and effective in pediatric patients with chronic asthma. European Respiratory Journal. 1997; Vol. 10, issue Suppl 25:221S.
Peden DB, Berger WE, Noonan MJ, Thomas MR, Hendricks VL, Hamedani AG, et al. Inhaled fluticasone propionate delivered by means of two different multidose powder inhalers is effective and safe in a large pediatric population with persistent asthma. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 1998;102(1):32‐8.

Rooklin 2001 {published data only}

Edin HM, Payne E, Herrle MR, Schoaf L, Mather DB, Scott CA, et al. Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination via HFA MDI improves quality of life. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 2001;107(2):S246.
Nathan RA, Mitchell D, Condemi J, Heller A, Schoaf L, Herrle M, et al. Cardiovascular and hypothalmic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis safety of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol HFA MDI in adolescent and adult patients with asthma. American Journal for Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2001;163(5):A863.
Pearlman DS, Kent E, Lanz MJ, Peden D, Baitinger L, Herrle M, et al. Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol HFA MDI has a rapid onset of effect in asthmatics treated with short or long‐acting beta‐agonists (BA) or inhaled coritcosteroids (ICS). Amercian Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2001;163(5):A865.
Rooklin A, Elkayam D, Weiler J, Windom H, Schoaf L, Scott C, et al. The fluticasone propionate/salmeterol HFA MDI is significantly more efficacious in treating asthma than placebo HFA MDI, fluticasone propionate CFC MDI or salmeterol CFC MDI. Journal of Allergy and Clinicial Immunology 2001;107(2):100s.

SAS30021 {published data only}

A stratified, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel group, 12‐week trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the fluticasone propionate/salmeterol DISKUS combination product 100/50mcg once daily versus fluticasone propionate DISKUS 100mg once daily and placebo in symptomatic paediatric subjects (4‐11 years) with asthma. www.clinicalstudyresults.org.

SAS30024 {published data only}

A 52‐week multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, double dummy, placebo‐controlled parallel group study to compare the efficacy and tolerability of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SERETIDE/VIANI/ADVAIR) 50/100mcg once daily in the morning with fluticasone propionate (FLIXOTIDE/FLOVENT) 100mcg twice daily and placebo twice daily, all via the DISKUS/ACCUHALER as initial maintenance therapy in mild asthmatic subjects. www.clinicalstudyresults.org.

Shapiro 2000 {published data only}

Aggarwal SK, Frith LJ, Ho M, Weeks T, Ho SY. Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol delivered from a single inhaler demonstrates synergistic benefits in asthma. Amercian Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2003;167(7):A890.
Bateman ED, Frith L, Braunstein GL. Achieving guideline‐based asthma control ‐ does the patient benefit?. European Respiratory Journal 2002;20:588‐95.
Bateman ED, Frith L, Ho M. Guideline‐based asthma control reduces maximally the impact of upon patient‐assessed quality of life. Amercian Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(8):A44.
Cook CK, Prillaman BA, House KW, Rickard KA, Shah TP. Concurrent use of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate Diskus powder combination product and fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray does not adversely affect HPA‐axis function. Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 2001;86(1):98.
Dorinsky P, Yancey S, Kral K, Emmett A, House K, Prillaman B, et al. Asthma control with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/250mcg) dry powder combination Diskus has a faster onset of effect compared woth salmeterol or fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma. Journal Allergy & Clinical Immunology 2000;161(Suppl 1):A195.
Edin H, Prillaman B, Baitinger LA, House KW, Shah TP. Improved ability to perform strenuous activities after treatment with fluticasone/salmeterol combination. Amercian Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(8):A112.
Lumry W, Windhom H, Mendelson L, Pedinoff A, Prillaman B, Baitinger L, et al. The salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/250mcg) dry powder combination Diskus has a faster onset of effect compared with salmeterol or fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma. Journal Allergy & Clinical Immunology 1999;103(1 Pt 2):S132.
Lundback B, Pieters WR, Johansson G, Palmqvist M, Price MJ, Sondhi S, et al. Cost‐effectiveness analyses of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination product and fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma 1: Introduction and Overview. Pharmacoeconomics 1999;16(Suppl 2):1‐8.
Markham A, Adkins JC. Inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination: A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of asthma. Pharmacoeconomics 2000;18(6):591‐608.
McCarthy TP, Edin H, House K, Vandermeer AK. Quality of life and asthma control assessment in patients previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), treated with salmeterol/fluticasone combination (SFC) metered dose inhaler (MDI). Thorax 2001;56(Suppl 3):64.
McCarthy TP, Edin HM, House K, Vandermeer AK, Scott C. Low dose salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SFC) via metered dose inhaler (MDI) improves asthma control and quality of life in patients not well controlled on inhaled steroids. European Respiratory Journal 2002;20(Suppl 38):47s.
Nathan RA, Dorinsky P, Carranza Rosenzweig JR, Shah T, Edin H, Prillaman B. Improved ability to perform strenuous exercises after treatment with fluticasone/salmeterol combination in patients with persistent asthma. Journal of Asthma 2003;40(7):815‐22.
Palmqvist M, Price MJ, Sondhi S, et al. Cost‐effectiveness analysis of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/250mcg vs fluticasone propionate 250mcg in adults and adolescents with asthma. 4: Results. Pharmacoeconomics 1999;16(Suppl 2):23‐8.
Pearlman D, Baitinger L, Woodring A, Prillaman B, House K, Shah T. Salmeterol 50mcg/fluticasone propionate 250mcg diskus combination product demonstrates improvements in lung function regardless of baseline corticosteroid therapy. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2000;161(Suppl 3):A196.
Pieters WR, Lundback B, Johansson G, Palmqvist M, Price MJ, Sondhi S, et al. Cost‐effectiveness analyses of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination product and fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma 2: Study Methodlogies. Pharmacoeconomics 1999;16(Suppl 2):9‐14.
Reese PR, Mahajan P, Woodring A. Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination product improves quality of life in asthma patients. European Respiratory Journal 1998;12(Suppl 28):35s.
Shapiro G, Lumry W, Wolfe J, Given J, White M, Woodring A, et al. Combined salmeterol 50mcg and fluticasone propionate 250mcg in the diskus device for the treatment of asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2000;161:527‐34.
Stempel DA. Salmeterol/fluticasone combination product in asthma ‐ An evaluation of its cost‐effectiveness vs fluticasone ‐ foreword. Pharmacoeconmics 1999;16(Suppl 2):U6‐7.
White MV, Shapiro G, Taylor J, Dunn A, Woodring L, Baitinger B, et al. The salmeterol xinofoate/fluticasone propionate dry powder combination product via diskus r inhaler improves asthma control compared to the individual products in patients previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Medicine 1999;159(3):A635.

Sheffer 1996 {published data only}

Sheffer AL, LaForce C, Chervinsky P, Pearlman D, Schaberg A. Fluticasone propionate aerosol: efficacy in patients with mild to moderate asthma. Fluticasone Propionate Asthma Study Group. Journal of Family Practice 1996;42(4):369‐75.

Sorkness 1999 {published data only}

Sorkness CA, LaForce C, Storms W, Lincourt WR, Edwards L, Rogenes PR. Effects of the inhaled corticosteroids fluticasone propionate, triamcinalone acetonide, and flunisolide and oral prednisolone on the hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis in adult patients with asthma. Clinical Therapeutics 1999;21(2):353‐67.

Sorkness 1999a {published data only}

Sorkness CA, LaForce C, Storms W, Lincourt WR, Edwards L, Rogenes PR. Effects of the inhaled corticosteroids fluticasone propionate, triamcinalone acetonide, and flunisolide and oral prednisolone on the hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis in adult patients with asthma. Clinical Therapeutics 1999;21(2):353‐67.

Sovijärvi 2003 {published data only}

Sovijärvi AR, Haahtela T, Ekroos HJ, Lindqvist A, Saarinen A, Poussa T, Laitinen LA. Sustained reduction in bronchial hyperresponsiveness with inhaled fluticasone propionate within three days in mild asthma: time course after onset and cessation of treatment. Thorax 2003;58(6):500‐4.
Sovijärvi ARA, Haahtela T, Ekroos HJ, Lindqvist A, Poussa T, Laitinen LA. Sustained reduction of bronchial hyperresponsiveness with inhaled fluticasone propionate in mild asthma within three days. European Respiratory Journal 2002;20(Suppl 38):197s.

van Grunsven 2000 {published data only}

van Grunsven PM, van Schayck CP, van Deuveren M, van Heerwarden CLA, Akkermans RP, van Weel C. Compliance during long‐term treatment with fluticasone propionate in subjects with early signs of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): Results of the Detection, Intervention, and Monitoring Program of COPD and Asthma (DIMCA) study. Journal of Asthma 2000;37(3):225‐34.

van Rensen 1999 {published data only}

van Rensen E, Straathof KCM, Veselic‐Charvat MA, Zwinderman AH, Bel EH, Sterk PJ. Effect of inhaled steroids on airway hyperresponsiveness, sputum eosinophils, and exhaled nitric oxide levels in patients with asthma. Thorax 1999;54:403‐8.

Van Schoor 2002 {published data only}

Van Schoor J, Joos GF, Pauwels RA. Effect of inhaled fluticasone on bronchial responsiveness to neurokinin A in asthma. European Respiratory Journal 2002;19(6):997‐1002.
Van Schoor J, Joos GF, Pauwels RA. The effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate on methacholine and neurokinin induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatics. European Respiratory Journal. 1999; Vol. 14:531S.

Ward 2001 {published data only}

Johns DP, Bish R, Reid DW, Ward C, Wilson JW, Ingram C, Walters EH. Twelve months treatment with fluticasone propionate (FP) decrases airway reactivity but does not affect airway distensibility (AD). European Respiratory Journal 2000;16(Suppl 31):341s.
Ward C, Johns DP, Bish R, Pais M, Reid DW, Ingrim C, et al. Reduced airway distensibility, fixed airflow limitation, and airway wall remodelling in asthma. Amercian Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2001;164:1718‐21.
Ward C, Pais M, Bish R, Feltis B, Johns D, Walters EH. Airway inflammation, basement membrane thickening and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthma. Thorax 2002;57(4):309‐16.
Wignarajah D, Zheng L, Pais M, Reid D, Harding R, Ward C, Walters EH. Inhaled corticosteroids decrease vessel numbers in the airway wall of asthmatics. Proceedings of the Thoracic Society of Australia & New Zealand, Annual Scientific Meeting, Adelaide, 4‐9 April 2003:P010.

Wasserman 1996 {published data only}

Wasserman SI, Gross GN, Schoenwetter WF, Munk ZM, Kral KM, Schaberg A, Kellerman DJ. A 12‐week dose‐ranging study of fluticasone propionate powder in the treatment of asthma. Journal of Asthma 1996;33(4):265‐74.

Wolfe 1996 {published data only}

Wolfe JD, Selner JC, Mendelson LM, Hampel FJr, Schaberg A. Effectiveness of fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate asthma: a dose‐ranging study. Clinical Therapeutics 1996;18(4):635‐46.

Wolfe 2000 BD {published data only}

Stanford R, Wightman D, Lincourt W, Edwards L, Crim C. Patient satisfaction with fluticasone propionate 250µg once daily. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A769.
Wolfe J, Rooklin A, Grady J, Munk ZM, Stevens A, Prillaman B, et al. Comparison of once‐ and twice‐daily dosing of fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms per day administered by diskus device in patients with asthma treated with or without inhaled corticosteroids. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2000;105(6 Pt 1):1153‐61.

Wolfe 2000 ICS {published data only}

Stanford R, Wightman D, Lincourt W, Edwards L, Crim C. Patient satisfaction with fluticasone propionate 250µg once daily. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A769.
Wolfe J, Rooklin A, Grady J, Munk ZM, Stevens A, Prillaman B, et al. Comparison of once‐ and twice‐daily dosing of fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms per day administered by diskus device in patients with asthma treated with or without inhaled corticosteroids. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2000;105(6 Pt 1):1153‐61.

ZuWallack 2000 {published data only}

ZuWallack R, Adelglass J, Clifford D, Duke S, Wire PD, Faris M, et al. Long‐term efficacy and dafety of fluticasone propionate powder administered once or twice daily via inhaler to patients with moderate asthma. Chest 2000;118(2):303‐12.

References to studies excluded from this review

Acuna 2001 {unpublished data only}

Acuna AA, Gabrijelcic J, Uribe EM, Rabinovich R, Barbera JA, Roca J, et al. Fluticasone propionate protects against platelet‐activating factor (PAF)‐included gas exchange defects in mild asthma. Annual Thoracic Society 97th International Conference; San Francisco CA, May 18‐23 2001.

Baitinger 2002 {unpublished data only}

Baitinger L, Dorinsky P, House K, Matthews P, Scott C, VanerMeer A. Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol HFA MDI combination product demonstrates superior improvements in lung function regardless of baseline asthma severity. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A568.

Bisgaard 1999 {published data only}

Bisgaard H. Efficacy of inhaled fluticasone propionate in the treatment of young children with asthmatic symptoms: a dose comparison study. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. 1998; Vol. 157, issue 3:A711.
Bisgaard H, Gillies J, Groenewald M, Maden C. The effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate in the treatment of young asthmatic children: a dose comparison study. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1999;160(1):126‐31.

Chervinsky 2001 {unpublished data only}

Chervinsky P, Kalberg C, Goode‐Sellers S, Edwards L, Lincourt W, Rickard K. A comparison of low dose fluticasone propionate and montelukast in patients stratified based on baseline asthma severity. Annual Thoracic Society 97th International Conference; San Francisco CA, May 18‐23 2001.

Cirule 2002 {unpublished data only}

Cirule I, Mehra S, Kamin W, StickS, Kudzyte MDJ, Wixon C, et al. Efficacy of fluticasone (200 mcg/day) in pre‐school children with chronic persistent asthma‐like symptoms. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):B38.

Dal Negro 2001 {unpublished data only}

Dal Negro R, Micheletto C, Tognella S, Trevisan F, Pomari C. Short‐term bronchodilation following salmeterol 50mcg and combined salmeterol + fluticasone propionate (50/250mcg) via diskus: a randomized, double blind cross‐over study in reversible airway obstruction. Annual Thoracic Society 97th International Conference; San Francisco CA, May 18‐23 2001.

de Benedictis 2001 {published data only}

de Benedictis FM, Teper A, Green RJ, Boner AL, Williams L, Medley H, et al. Effects of 2 inhaled corticosteroids on growth: results of a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 2001;155(11):1248‐54.

Dente 2001 {unpublished data only}

Dente FL, Scuotri L, Bacci E, DeSanctis M, Di Franco A, Giannini D, et al. Combined treatment with fluticasone plus salmeterol protects against allergen‐induced asthmatic responses better than each drug alone. European Respiratory Journal 2001;18(Suppl 33):349s.

Efthimiou 1998 {published data only}

Efthimiou I, Westbroek J, Saarelainen S, Laher M, O'Brien J, Barnacle H. Oral steroid sparing effect of nebulised fluticasone propionate at two dose levels with placebo over a 3 month period in patients with severe chronic asthma. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. 1998; Vol. 157, issue 3:A404.

Eliraz 2002 {unpublished data only}

Eliraz A, Fritscher CC, Perez CMR, Boonsawat W, Nang AN, Bardin P, et al. Symbicort® (Budesonide/Formoterol) achieves more rapid control of asthma that fluticasone in patients with mild asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A567.

Falcoz 2000a {published data only}

Falcoz C, Horton J, Mackie A, Harding S, Daley‐Yates PT. Pharmacokinetics of fluticasone propionate inhaled via the diskhaler and diskus powder devices in patients with mild‐to‐moderate asthma. Cinical Pharmacokinetics 2000;39(Suppl 1):31‐7.

Faul 2002 {unpublished data only}

Faul JL, Canfield JC, Gould MK, Wilson SR, Kischner WG. A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, crossover study comparing the effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate (880 Micrograms per day) and montelukast (10 MG per day) on glucose control patients with diabetes and asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A217.
Faul JL, Chu JW, Kuschner WG, Wilson SR. Effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate and oral montelukast on glucose control in diabetic subjects with asthma: a double‐blind placebo‐controlled crossover study. Chest International Conference, San Diego CA. 2002.

Fletcher 1999 {published data only}

Fletcher P, Alfaham MA, Barnacle H, Maslen TK. Effect of fluticasone propionate Nebules 0.5 mg bd for treating symptomatic asthma in children under 4 years. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1999;159(3 pt 2):A141.

Fowler 2002 {published data only}

Fowler SJ, Orr LC, Sims EJ, Wilson AM, Currie GP, McFarlane L, et al. Therapeutic ratio of hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon formulations of fluticasone propionate. Chest 2002;122(2):618‐23.

Harrison 2001 {published data only}

Harrison TW, Wisnieswki A, Honour J, Tattersfield AE. Comparison of the systemic effects of fluticasone propionate and budesonide given by dry powder inhaler in healthy and asthmatic subjects. Thorax 2001;56:186‐91.

Kanniess 2001 {unpublished data only}

Kanniess F, Richter K, Bohme S, Magnussen H. Comparison of the efficacy of fluticasone versus montelukast in patients with moderate asthma. Annual Thoracic Society 97th International Conference; San Francisco CA, May 18‐23 2001.

Kelly 2001 {published data only}

Kelly MM, Leigh R, Parameswaran K, Jayaram L, Belda J, Goodwin S, et al. Establishing dose response and relative potencies of inhaled corticosteroids. Annual Thoracic Society 97th International Conference; San Francisco CA, May 18‐23 2001.

Lee 2002 {unpublished data only}

Lee TA, Sullivan SD, Weiss K, Georges G. Comparison of the cost‐effectiveness of inhaled triamcinolone acetonide HFA to inhaled fluticasone propionate CFC in adult asthmatics in a 12‐month pragmatic trial. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A111.

Leibman 2002 {published data only}

Leibman CW, Stanford R, Emmett A, Dorinsky PM, Rickard KA. Cost‐effectiveness of fluticasone propionate‐slmeterol combination versus fluticasone + montelukast in the treatment of persistent asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):B4.

Lipworth 1997 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Lipworth BJ, Clark DJ, McFarlane LC. Adrenocortical activity with repeated twice daily dosing of fluticasone propionate and budesonide given via a large volume spacer to asthmatic school children. Thorax 1997;52(8):686‐9.

Lujik 2004 {published data only}

Luijk B, Kempsford RD, Wright AM, Zanen P, Lammers J‐WJ. Duration of effect of single‐dose inhaled fluticasone propionate on AMP‐induced bronchoconstriction. European Respiratory Journal 2004;23(4):559‐64.

Majer‐Teboul 2001 {unpublished data only}

Majer‐Teboul C, Chemali‐Hudry J, Texereau J, Granier C, Dinh‐Xuan AT. Similar anti‐inflammatory effects of flixotide™ 500mug/day vs becotide™ 1000mug/day on exhaled NO after 7‐days treatment in asthma.. Annual Thoracic Society 97th International Conference; San Francisco CA, May 18‐23. 2001.

Moore 1998 {published data only}

Moore WC, Pearce SJ, Hmieleski RR, Rogenes PR, Reed KD, Bleecker ER. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) following allergen challenge: effect of fluticasone propionate (FP). American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1998;157(3 Suppl):A872.

Overbeek 2002 {unpublished data only}

Overbeek SE, O'Sullivan S, Leman K, Mulder PGM, Hoogsteden Prins JB. Treatment with montelukast is less effective in reducing eosinophilic airway inflammation than fluticasone propionate in atopic asthmatics. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A215.

Pao 2002 {published data only}

Pao CS, McKenzie SA. Randomized controlled trial of fluticasone in preschool children with intermittent wheeze. Amercian Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;166:945‐9.

Srebro 1998 {unpublished data only}

Srebro SH, Rogenes PR, Edwards L, Lincourt WR. Comparison of efficacy and HPA effects of fluticasone propionate versus flunisolide in patients with mild to moderate asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1998;157(3 Suppl):A406.

Teper 1998 {published data only}

Teper AM, Colom AJ, Cherry HR, Robaldo JF, Kofman CD, Maffey AF, et al. Effect of fluticasone propionate on asthmatic infants. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. 1998; Vol. 157, issue 3:A711.

Wilson 1997 {published data only}

Wilson AM, McFarlane LC, Lipworth BJ. Dose‐response effect for adrenal suppression with repeated twice daily inhaled fluticasone propionate and triamcinolone acetonide in adult asthmatics. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1997;156(4 Pt 1):1274‐7.

Wilson 1998a {published data only}

Wilson AM, Clark DJ, Devlin MM, McFarlane LC, Lipworth BJ. Adrenocortical activity with repeated administration of one‐daily inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide in asthmatic adults. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1998;53(5):317‐20.

Wilson 1998b {published data only}

Wilson AM, Sims EJ, Struthers AD, Lipworth BJ. Inhaled corticosteroid therapy reduces the early morning peak in cortisol and aldosterone. Clinical Science 1998;95(4):513‐7.

Wong 1997 {published data only}

Wong J, Moon S, O'Callahan C, Simpson H. Inhaled steroids reduce the respiratory symptoms following bronchiolitis in infancy: a double‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled study. European Respiratory Journal. 1997; Vol. 157, issue 3:430S.

References to studies awaiting assessment

Stanford 2004 {unpublished data only}

Stanford R, Crim C, Wightman D, Edwards L, Rickard K. The impact of once daily fluticasone propionate on asthma specific quality of life in adolescents and adults with persistent asthma [Abstract]. Journal of Allergy, Asthma and Immunolgy 2002;109(Suppl 1):Abstract No: 548.

Wignarajah 2004 {unpublished data only}

Wignarajah D, Zheng L, Reid D, Harding R, Walters EH. Fluticasone priopionate decreases airway vascularity in asthma [Abstract]. Respirology 2004;9(Suppl 2):A24.

Barnes 1998

Barnes PJ, Pedersen S, Busse WW. Efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1998;157:S1‐S53.

BTS 1997

British Thoracic Society. The British guidelines on asthma management 1995 review and position statement. Thorax 1997;52(Suppl 1):S1‐20.

BTS 2003

The British Thoracic Society/Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. British Guideline on the Management of Asthma. Thorax 2003;58(Suppl 1):i1‐94.

Cates 2003 [Computer program]

Cates C. Visual Rx. Online NNT Calculator.. http://www.nntonline.net/: Cates C, 2003.

GINA 1995

National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Global initiative for asthma management and prevention NHBLI/WHO workshop report. National Institute of Health, Bethseda, MD1995, issue NIH Publication No. 95‐3659.

Jadad 1996

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Current Controlled Trials 1996;17(1):1‐12.

Masoli 2005

Masoli M, Weatherall M, Beasley R. Fluticasone given once versus twice a day: Meta‐analysis. Respirology 2005;10(2):183‐8.

NHBLI 1997

National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Managment of Asthma, Expert Panel Report No. 2. Bethesda MD: NIH/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute1997, issue NIH Publication No. 97‐4051.

Pedersen 1997

Pedersen D, O'Byrne P. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma. Allergy: European Journal of Allergy & Clincal Immunology 1997;52(Suppl 39):S1‐S34.

Sorkness 1998

Sorkness CA. Establishing a therapeutic index for the inhaled corticosteroids: part II. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 1998;102:S52‐S64.

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Agertoft 1997

Methods

Setting: Denmark, paediatric outpatient clinic Design: crossover, 2 week washout Length of intervention period: 2 weeks Randomisation: yes, computer generated random sequence with balanced blocks Masking: double‐blind Excluded: stated (none) Withdrawals: stated (one child from low dose group due to sore throat) Baseline characteristics: comparable between groups Jadad score: 5

Participants

48 children: 27M 21F
Age range: 6‐12 years
Inclusion criteria:
Pre‐pubertal children
Mild asthma requiring treatment with as needed beta2 agonists only
Exclusion criteria:
Inhaled or oral steroid use in last 2 months

Interventions

Group 1 randomised to:

1. FP: 200mcg/d via Accuhaler DPI

2. BUD: 200 mcg/d via Turbuhaler DPI

3. Placebo

Group 2 randomised to:

1. FP: 400mcg/d via Accuhaler DPI

2. BUD: 400 mcg/d via Turbuhaler DPI

3. Placebo

Outcomes

24 hour urinary cortisol excretion
Growth by lower leg knemometry
FEV1
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Daily asthma symptom score

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Allen 1998

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, paediatric outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 12 months
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: yes (randomisation code generated off site and concealed using sealed envelopes)
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

344 children enrolled, 325 randomised: 81M 244F
Age range: M 4‐11 years, F 4‐9 years )
Inclusion criteria:
Pre‐pubescent children with mild to moderate asthma (ATS criteria 1987) for at least 3 months
FEV1 60 (% predicted) or greater
Exclusion criteria:
Systemic, intra‐nasal or opthalmic corticosteroids in last month
More than 60 days of systemic corticosteroid use in last 2 years

Interventions

FP:
1. 50 mcg 2xdaily (100 mcg/d)

2. 100 mcg 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily via

Delivery device: Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

Height assessment
Oral corticosteroids for asthma exacerbation (No. of courses or prednisolone)
Withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation
HRQOL: Functional Status IIR (FSII) questionnaire, Sleep Scale Children (SLP‐C) questionnaire, Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children Questionnaire (QOL‐PAC)
Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Notes

Authors confirmed use of allocation concealment

Criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy: requirement for more than two seven day courses of oral corticosteroid

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Allen 2000

Methods

Setting: muticentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 12 months
Randomisation: yes (method not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 3

Participants

111 adults randomised enrolled. Distribution between groups not clear. Mean FEV1: 61%

Interventions

i) FP 1000mcg BiD (2000); ii) FP500mcg BiD (1000); iii) Placebo.
Inhaler device: Diskus.

Outcomes

Steroid consumption; lung function; adverse events Steroid consumption; lung function; adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Arets 2002

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, paediatric asthma hospital clinic, Europe
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: Yes (method not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 3

Participants

88 children enrolled, 68 randomised. Mean age: FP: 6.86 (sd 1.5); PLA: 6.97 (sd 1.48); FEV1 (L): FP: 1.54 (sd 0.37); PLA: 1.53 (sd 0.39); FEV1 %: FP: 104.1 (sd 10.8); PLA: 99.8 (sd 17); Rescue medication free days: FP: 49.4 (sd 36.3); PLA: 45.8 (sd 38.3); am PEF L/min: FP: 213.4 (sd 63.9); PLA: 210.6 (sd 58.6); pm PEF: FP: 219.1 (sd 62.3); PLA: 219.8 (sd 58).

Inclusion criteria: Age 5‐10; Physician diagnosed asthma

Exclusion criteria: Use of systemic steroids in last 2 months; ICS >100mcg/d; Salbutamol >1600mcg/d during >30% days of last year; hospitalisation with asthma in last 2 weeks

Interventions

FP250mcg/d versus Placebo. Inhaler device: MDI + spacer.

Outcomes

FEV1; PEF; Symptom‐free days; wheeze score; parent global evaluation

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Berger 2002 BD

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: Yes (computer‐generated blocks of four)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated (ITT analysis)

Jadad score: 5

Participants

408 adults randomised. Age range: 12‐74; FEV1 (L): FP: 2.52 (SEM 0.05); PLA: 2.51 (SEM 0.04); FEV1 (% pred): FP: 72 (SEM 7.3); PLA: 71.9 (SEM 6.9); am PEF (L/min): FP: 363.7 (SEM 7.3); PLA: 356.1 (SEM 6.7); pm PEF (L/min): FP: 394.2 (SEM 7.5); PLA: 380.9 (SEM 7.1); Composite asthma scores: FP: 2.45 (SEM 0.06); PLA: 2.40 (SEM 0.05); Symptom free days (%): FP: 3.1 (SEM 0.7); PLA: 3.5 (SEM 0.9); Rescue medication usage (% days): FP: 13.3 (SEM 1.6); PLA: 13.5 (SEM 1.5); Night awakenings (N during baseline week): FP: 0.94 (SEM 0.09); PLA: 0.82 (SEM 0.08).

Inclusion criteria: >12 years of age; asthma confirmed by ATS criteria; requirement for pharmacotherapy for at least 6 mo; previous treatment with SABA; no ICS rx for 1 mo prior to study entry; FEV1 between 60‐85% predicted; >12% reversibility <30mins after inhalation of 180mcg SABA.

Exclusion criteria: Life‐threatening/unstable asthma; other clinically significant uncontrolled disease; chicken‐pox within 3 weeks; hypersensitivity to ß‐agonists, sympathomimetics, or corticosteroids; respiratory infection; pregnancy; current tobacco usage or >10 pack‐year history of smoking; use of the investigational drugs; participants not allowed to use LABAs, sodium cromoglycate, nedocromil, anticholinergic agents, leukotriene antagonists

Interventions

FP250 versus placebo.
Inhaler device: Diskus.

Outcomes

FEV1; am PEF; pm PEF; Symptoms; Rescue medication usage; Withdrawals; Tolerability; Exacerbations

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Berger 2002 ICS

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: Yes (computer‐generated blocks of four)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated (ITT analysis)

Jadad score: 5

Participants

401 adults randomised. Age range 12‐84; FEV1 (L): FP: 2.47 (SEM 0.04); PLA: 2.47 (SEM 0.04); FEV1 (%): FP: 75.9 (SEM 8.6); PLA: 75.8 (SEM 8.3); am PEF (L/min): FP: 384.5 (SEM 7.5); PLA: 372.9 (SEM 6.1); pm PEF (L/min): FP: 401.2 (SEM 7.9); PLA: 391.1 (SEM 6.43); Composite asthma scores: FP: 1.45 (SEM 0.07); PLA: 1.36 (SEM 0.07); Symptom free days: FP: 25.7 (SEM 2.6); PLA: 28.1 (SEM 2.6); Rescue medication usage (puffs/day): FP: 1.87 (0.12); PLA: 1.82 (SEM 0.11); Rescue medication free days: FP: 41 (SEM 2.7); PLA: 39.3 (SEM 2.8); Night awakenings (in baseline week): FP: 0.68 (SEM 0.06); PLA: 0.54 (sem 0.06)

Inclusion criteria: >12 years of age; asthma confirmed by ATS criteria; use of ICS for 3 months prior to study entry; stable low dose of ICS for 1 month prior to study entry (BDP: 168‐504mcg/d; FP: 88‐264mcg/d; Flunisolide: 500‐1000mcg/d; TAA: 400‐1000; BUD: 200‐400mcg/d); FEV1: 60‐90% predicted; >12% reversibility <30mins after inhalation of 180mcg SABA.

Exclusion criteria: Life‐threatening/unstable asthma; other clinically significant uncontrolled disease; chicken‐pox within 3 weeks; hypersensitivity to ß‐agonists, sympathomimetics, or corticosteroids; respiratory infection; pregnancy; current tobacco usage or >10 pack‐year history of smoking; use of the investigational drugs; participants not allowed to use LABAs, sodium cromoglycate, nedocromil, anticholinergic agents, leukotriene antagonists

Interventions

FP250 versus placebo. Inhaler device: Diskus.

Outcomes

FEV1; am PEF; pm PEF; Symptoms; Rescue medication usage; Withdrawals; Tolerability; Exacerbations

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Boonsawat 2004

Methods

Setting: multicentre study in Australia, France, UK, Hungary, Ukraine, Italy, Philippines, Thailand, Russia
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: Yes (method not stated)
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated (ITT analysis)

Jadad score: 3

Participants

464 adults with mild asthma randomised to three treatment groups (two groups of relevance to the review: FP100: 155; PLA: 158). Age range: 12‐80 (mean 33‐34 years); Mean baseline FEV1: 3.2‐3.3L

Inclusion criteria: 12‐80 years; documented history of asthma >/=6 months; receiving SABA prn alone

Interventions

FP100 OD versus placebo via HFA MDI

Outcomes

mean am & pm PEF; FEV1; advere events; rescue medication usage; symptoms

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Busse 2001

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: Yes (computer generated sequence: blocks of six randomised)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double‐blind, double‐dummy
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated (ITT population)

Jadad score: 4

Participants

338 adults randomised. Age range: 12‐75 years. Baseline pulmonary function 66‐67% predicted across treatment groups; % participants with 70.1‐80% FEV1 predicted: FP 51;Zaf: 55; Pla: 46; Participants with 50 ‐ 70 % predicted FEV1: FP: 60; Zaf: 52; Pla: 65; Participants with asthma diagnosed >/=10 years: 64‐73% across treatment groups.

Inclusion criteria: >12 years; asthma diagnosed according to ATS; use of SABA (scheduled or prn) for at least 6 weeks preceding the study FEV1 between 50‐80% predicted; reversibility of FEV1 (12% increase within 30 minutes after inhaling 180mg albuterol).

Exclusion criteria: Life‐threatening asthma; significant and uncontrolled disease (COPD/coronary disease); use of tobacco products in preceding year/smoking history of more than 10 pack‐years; systemic steroid within 1 mo of screening; leukotriene modifier within 1 wk of screening.

Interventions

Inhaled FP (88mcg BID) via pMDI + oral placebo versus inhaled placebo + oral zafirlukast versus placebo. Inhaler device: MDI

Outcomes

Lung function (Change in FEV1; am/pm PEF); Symptoms (symptom scores; symptom‐free days; awakenings due to asthma); Medication usage (albuterol use (puffs day); albuterol‐free days);

Notes

Study reported in abstract form only

Study also included a parallel treatment arm with oral zafirlukast 20 mcg 2xdaily

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Casale 2001

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 3 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not reported)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 3

Participants

134 adults randomised. Age range: 18‐50. Mean FEV1 (SD): PLA: 3.0 (0.66); FP110: 3.3 (0.86); FP220: 3.2 (0.67); FP330: 3.0 (0.69); FP440: 3.2 (0.77).

Inclusion criteria: non‐smokers; 18‐50 years; diagnosis of persistent mild to moderate asthma confirmed within previous 12 months by response to SABA (increase in FEV1 >/= 12%)/methacholine challenge <8mg/mL); FEV1 >/=65% predicted; no OCS/nasal/ICS use in previous 6 months.

Exclusion criteria: significant pulmonary disease (e.g. COPD); exacerbation within 6 weeks; URTI within 30 days screening; oestrogen usage; current condition that might confound data interpretation

Interventions

PLA versus FP220 versus FP440 versus FP660 versus FP880.

Inhaler device: pMDI

Participants also randomised to flunisolide 500 bid, 1000 bid and prednisolone 7.5mg qd

Outcomes

HPA function

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Chervinsky 1994

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 8 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

331 adults
Mean age: 48‐59 years
Inclusion criteria:
Mild to moderate asthma (as defined by the Committee on Diagnostic standards for Non‐Tuberculous Respiratory Diseases 1962)
Treatment with BDP for at least 1 month prior to study and daily beta2 agonist, or daily theophylline for at least 2 weeks prior to study
FEV1 60‐90 (% predicted)
Exclusion criteria:
Not stated

Interventions

FP:
1. 25 mcg 1 puff 2xdaily (50 mcg/d)

2. 100 mcg 2xdaily (200mcg/d)

3. 500 mcg 2xdaily (1000 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2 xdaily

Delivery device: MDI

Outcomes

Probability of remaining in study

All outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline:
FEV1
FVC
FEF25‐75
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Daily symptom score
Daily beta2 agonist use
Night awakenings
Morning plasma cortisol
Plasma cortisol 30‐60 min post 250 mcg iv cosyntropin
Urinary free cortisol
Plasma cortisol 60 min post ACTH

Physician‐rated global assessment of efficacy
Oropharyngeal side‐effects

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning PEFR, night‐time awakenings or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Condemi 1997

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 24 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind, double dummy
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 4

Participants

378 adults enrolled, 291 randomised: 142M 149F
Age range: 12‐74 years
Inclusion criteria:
Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987)
Requirement or maintenance ICS for 4 weeks or longer
FEV1 50‐80 (% predicted)
15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist
One or more urgent or emergency care visit due to asthma in last 12 months
During one week run‐in: no more than 3 days of rescue beta2 agonist use 12 puffs/d, no more than 4 days when morning PEFR 20% lower than previous evening PEFR, no more than 3 nights with awakening due to asthma symptoms
Adequate compliance
Exclusion criteria:
Systemic of intranasal steroid in last month
Current use of nedocromil or cromolyn
Previous treatment with methotrexate or gold salts
Immunotherapy requiring change in dose regimen in last 12 weeks
Pregnancy or lactation

Interventions

FP: 250 mcg 2xdaily (500 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

Change in FEV1 compared to baseline
Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline
Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline
Change in % symptom free days compared to baseline
Change in No. night‐time awakenings compared to baseline
Change in daily rescue beta2 agonist use compared to baseline
Change in % rescue beta2 agonist free days compared to baseline
Withdrawal due to lacy of efficacy
Probability of remaining in study
Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

Intention‐to‐treat analysis employed

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning PEFR, night‐time awakenings or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

Study also included a TA treatment arm: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Convery 2000

Methods

Setting: Multicentre study, Europe and North America
Length of intervention period: 6 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: not stated

Jadad score: 2

Participants

52 adults randomised. Age range 20‐50. FEV1 % predicted: PLA: 99.5 (SD 13.57); FP: 102.86 (SD 12.41); PD20 mcg: PLA: 5.47 (SD 1.33); FP2000: 5.58 (SD 0.93).

Inclusion criteria: PD20 <1600mcg from 2 baseline methacholine tests conducted within 2 weeks but separated by 48 hours; 20‐50 years of age; nonsmokers and smokers who had smoked at least 5 cigarettes daily.

Exclusion criteria: Use of ß‐blocking or antimuscarinic drugs; use of aspirin or nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory; RTI requiring antibiotics in preceding 4 weeks; uncontrolled systemic disease; history of alcohol abuse

Interventions

FP2000 versus PLA. Delivery device: pMDI.

Outcomes

Expired levels of carbon monoxide; FEV1; PD20

Notes

Participants recruited had not knowingly been diagnosed with asthma ‐ Participants with positive PD20 tests were recruited.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Corsico 2000

Methods

Setting: single centre, Italy
Length of intervention period: 4 weeks
Randomisation: yes (not stated)
Allocation concealment: Design: parallel group
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: not stated

Jadad score: 2

Participants

31 adults randomised. Age: FP: 31 (SD 9); PLA: 31 (SD 12); FEV1 %: FP: 98 (SD 15); PLA: 102 (SD 14); FVC % pred: FP: 110 (SD 12); PLA: 112 (SD 12). Participants were described as suffering from mild asthma according to ATS criteria. All participants were on SABAs as needed.

Inclusion criteria: Positive response to inhalation challenge with methacholine; clinically stable for previous 2 months; FEV1 >80% predicted; not to have suffered URTI in previous 4 weeks

Interventions

FP: 1500mcg versus PLA. Inhaler device: Unclear.

Outcomes

FEV1; FVC; IVC; Vmax 50; Vp50; log max dose of MCh mcg; log PD20 mg; FVC versus FEV1; Intercept; slope; IVC versus Vp50; Intercept; Slope; Vmax 50 versus Vp 50; Intercept; Slope

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Derom 1999

Methods

Setting: single centre study, Belgium
Length of intervention period: 1 week
Randomisation: yes (method not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: crossover study
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated (non‐ITT)

Jadad score: 3

Participants

23 adults randomised; Age range: 19‐57; FEV1: 2.95 (SD 0.83) (FEV1 % predicted: 80.0 (SD 21.4)); Mean FVC: 4.42 L (SD 0.94).

Inclusion criteria: either sex; 18‐60 years of age; ATS defined asthma; >/=40% predicted value; Either post‐BD increase in FEV1 of at least 200ml or >/=12% of baseline, OR diurnal variation of PEF >/=15% on at least 2 days/week during run‐in.

Exclusion criteria: Exacerbation 4 wks before inclusion; use of oral steroids within 4 weeks; use of ICS within 6 months; other systemic steroids within 4 weeks

Interventions

FP 200mcg; FP 1000mcg; BUD: 200mcg; BUD 800mcg; Placebo. Inhaler device: DPI

Outcomes

FEV1; PEFR; Serum cortisol; White blood cell count; Neutrophils; Basophils

Notes

Data reported for effects after 24 hours @ 1 week

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Derom 2001

Methods

Setting: single centre study, Belgium
Length of intervention period: unclear
Randomisation: yes (not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: crossover study
Masking: double blind, double dummy
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: not stated

Jadad score: 2

Participants

25 adults randomised

Interventions

FP500 versus FP1000 versus PLA; washout period: 3 weeks. Study duration: 6 treatment periods unclear duration. Inhaler device: unclear.

Outcomes

Cortisol suppression; PC20

Notes

Conference abstract

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Dorinsky 2004

Methods

Setting: multicentre study in North America
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes (not stated)
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 3

Participants

FP and PLA groups: 224 adults randomised. Mean age: 32‐33 years; Baseline am PEF: 72‐3% predicted

Inclusion criteria: >/=12 years; diagnosis of asthma for at least 3 months; FEV1 50‐85%; >/=15% reversibility to SABA; symptoms on 4 days of week preceding randomisation

Interventions

1. FP250 1 x daily
2. PLA 1 x daily

Inhaler device: DPI

Outcomes

am & pm PEF; symptoms; SABA usage; withdrawals; adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Ekroos 1999

Methods

Setting: Finland, hospital outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 6 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: no details
Withdrawals: no details
Baseline characteristics: no demographic data presented
Jadad score: 2

Participants

26 adults: 11M 15F
Age range: 21‐59 years
Inclusion criteria:
Adult non‐smoking asthmatics
Histamine BHR (PD15 FEV1) < 0.6mg
Exclusion criteria:
Oral or inhaled steroid use in last 2 months

Interventions

FP: 250 mcg 2xdaily (500 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: MDI

Outcomes

Exhaled nitric oxide concentration
Histamine BHR (PD15 FEV1)

Notes

Study reported in abstract form only

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Falcoz 2000

Methods

Setting: multicentre study
Length of intervention period: 6 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated (non‐ITT)

Jadad score: 3

Participants

232 adults randomised; 230 evaluable. Age range: 18‐72 years. Participants suffered from mild‐to‐moderate asthma

Inclusion criteria: Mild‐to‐moderate asthma (defined as FEV1 50‐80%)

Exclusion criteria: Not stated

Interventions

FP 100mcg versus FP 500mcg versus placebo. Duration 6 weeks. Inhaler device: DPI.

Outcomes

Plasma concentrations

Notes

Data taken only for study 1. Study 2 assessed equal dose of FP given via different inhalers

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Faul 1998

Methods

Setting: two centre study UK and Ireland, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 8 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not described
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

27 adults randomised, 23 completed: 16M 7F
Age range: 19‐45 years
Inclusion criteria:
Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987)
FEV1 > 40 (% predicted)
12.5% or greater improvement in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist
Histamine BHR (PC20 FEV1) 8 mg/ml or less
Exclusion criteria:
Treatment with corticosteroids in last 3 months
Exacerbation of asthma within last 3 months
Pregnancy or serious concurrent illness

Interventions

FP: 250 mcg 4 puffs 2xdaily (2000 mcg/d)

Placebo: 4 pfs 2xdaily

Delivery device: MDI+Volumatic spacer

Outcomes

FEV1 (after:baseline ratio)
Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (after:baseline ratio)
FEV1/FVC ratio (after:baseline ratio)
FEF25‐75 (after:baseline ratio)
Histamine bronchial responsiveness (PC20 FEV1) (after:baseline ratio)
Bronchial wall immunopathology:
Total T cells, primed T cells, CD4:CD8 ratios, CD68+ cells, inductive and suppressive macrophages, eosinophils, activated eosinophils.

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

Non‐parametric analyses for all outcomes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Galant 1996

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics:
Jadad score: 4

Participants

353 adolescents/adults: 236M 117F
Age range: 12‐75 years
Inclusion criteria:
12 years of age or older
FEV1 45‐75 (% predicted)
15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist
Significant asthma symptoms during run‐in period: e.g. daily asthma symptoms with > 8 puffs beta2 agonist/day or 2‐ 4 weekly nighttime awakenings due to asthma
Exclusion criteria:
History of life‐threatening asthma
Smokers of 10 pack years or greater
Previous use of inhaled, oral, injectable or intra‐nasal corticosteroids
Pregnancy

Interventions

FP:
1. 25 mcg 2 puffs 2xdaily (100 mcg/d)

2. 50 mcg 2 puffs 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2 puffs 2xdaily

Delivery device: MDI

Outcomes

Probability of remaining in study

All outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline:

FEV1
Morning PEFR
Daily use of beta2 agonist
Daily asthma symptom score
Night‐time awakenings per week

'Effective or very effective' Physician rated global assessment of efficacy (No. of patients)

Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on diurnal variability in PEFR, night‐time awakenings, rescue beta2 agonist use and FEV1

Study also included an oral theophylline treatment arm: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Galant 1999

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind, double dummy
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 4

Participants

229 adults and adolescents: 116M 113F
Age range: 13‐76 years
Inclusion criteria:
12 years of age or older
Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987)
FEV1 60‐80 (% predicted)
15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 following inhaled beta2 agonist
15% or greater variability in FEV1 in previous 6 months
Exclusion criteria:
Pregnancy or severe concurrent disease
Use of methotrexate, gold salts, oral or injectable corticosteroids in last 4 weeks

Interventions

FP:
1. 500 mcg 2xdaily (1000 mcg/d) via Accuhaler DPI

2. 500 mcg 2xdaily (1000 mcg/d) via Diskhaler DPI

Placebo: via 2xdaily

Outcomes

Probability of remaining in study

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline:

FEV1
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Daily asthma symptom score
Daily use of beta2 agonist
Night‐time awakenings per week

Morning plasma cortisol
Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning PEFR, night‐time awakenings, rescue beta2 agonist use or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Giannini 2003

Methods

Setting: single centre study, Italy
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes (not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 3

Participants

27 randomised. Mean age: 38.67 (SD 16.97). M/F: 15/12; history of atopy: 18/6; FEV1: 3.23 (SD 0.91); FEV1 % predicted (median (range)): 96 (76‐122); PD20: 0.220

Inclusion criteria: diurnal/nocturnal symptoms=0, low PEF variability [maximal amplitude(‐MA) <10%).

Exclusion criteria: no use of ß‐agonists throughout run‐in

Interventions

FP100 versus FP250 versus PLA. Inhaler device: unclear.

Outcomes

FEV1; PD20; Sputum eosinophils; max amplitude; PEF; Symptoms; Rescue medication use

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Given 2004

Methods

Setting: Not stated
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes (not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: not stated

Jadad score: 2

Participants

241 children with asthma. Most children had NHLBI mderate‐severe persistent asthma (77‐9%)

Inclusion criteria: 4‐11 years of age; >/=6 months diagnosis of asthma requireing treatment; PEF >/=85% predicted

Exclusion criteria: systemic steroids >/=10 weeks prior to study entry

Interventions

1. FP 100 2 x daily (200mcg/d)

2. Placebo

Inhaler device: HFA‐MDI

Outcomes

Am PEF; symptoms; adverse events

Notes

Unpublished conference abstract

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Hart 2000

Methods

Setting: single centre study, UK
Length of intervention period: 14 weeks
Randomisation: yes
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: crossover study
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: not stated

Jadad score: 2

Participants

15 adults randomised; Age years: 28 (SE 1.4); FEV1 L: 3.7 (SE 0.2); FEV1 (% pred): 98.5 (SE 2.8); log 10 PC20: ‐0.35 (SE 0.15). Participants described as suffering from mild, stable asthma

Inclusion criteria: <15% improvement in FEV1 after 200mcg SABA; PC20 <4mg/mL; Atopy (</=2 +ve skin prick test to common allergens; inhaled or oral steroids in preceding 6 months.

Exclusion criteria: Current smokers/ex‐smokers of <5 pack years; patients <80% predicted

Interventions

FP1000mcg daily versus placebo. Inhaler device: pMDI.

Outcomes

Cell count; BHR; protein expression; DNA‐binding

Notes

No clinical outcomes reported. Lung function (FEV1 and PEF recorded but not presented)

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Hoekstra 1996

Methods

Setting: The Netherlands, primary care and hospital outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealament: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

34 children: 26M 8F
Inclusion criteria:
Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1975)
Serum IgE greater than normal range (corrected for age)
At least one specific serum IgE against a major inhaled allergen
FEV1 > 75 (%predicted)
Histamine BHR (PC20 FEV1) < 8 mg/ml
10% or greater reversibility in spirometric measures after inhaled beta2 agonist
Exclusion criteria:
Use of inhaled corticosteroids in last 4 weeks
Need for systemic corticosteroids > 3 times in last 6 months

Interventions

FP: 100 mcg 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

FEV (% predicted)
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Nocturnal (4 am) PEFR
Morning wheeze score
Histamine BHR (log 2 PC20 FEV1)
Change in % reversibility of FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist compared to baseline
Morning serum cortisol
Morning urine cortisol
Blood eosinophil count
Serum ECP
Serum EDN
Urinary EDN

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Hofstra 2000

Methods

Setting: The Netherlands, paediatric outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 6 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: no details
Withdrawals: no details
Baseline characteristics: no details
Jadad score: 2

Participants

37 children
Age range: 6‐14 years
Inclusion criteria:
Diagnosis of asthma
20% or greater fall in FEV1 after exercise test
Exclusion criteria:
ICS use in last 4 months

Interventions

FP:
1. 100 mcg 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

2. 250 mcg 2xdaily (500 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: not stated

Outcomes

% fall in FEV1 post exercise test

Notes

Study reported in abstract form only

Patients were randomised to receive FP or placebo and treated for 6 weeks. After 6 weeks patients receiving placebo were re‐randomised to either dose of FP for a further 18 weeks

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Jayaram 2002

Methods

Setting: unclear
Length of intervention period: unclear
Randomisation: yes (method not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: not stated

Jadad score: 1

Participants

N = 31 (PLA: N = 13; FP: N = 18)

Interventions

FP versus PLA (dosage unclear)

Outcomes

Sputum eosinophils; symptoms; rescue medication usage; exacerbations; spirometry; am & pm PEF; adverse events

Notes

Conference abstract

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Jeffery 2002

Methods

Setting: single centre teaching hospital
Length of intervention period: 6 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: crossover study
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 3

Participants

20 adults randomised; Mean age: 31.3 years; Mean FEV1 (L): 3; Mean FEV1 % pred: 75.6; Mean PC20: 0.29.

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of asthma; >/=15% reversibility in FEV1; bronchial reactivity had to be <4mg/mL; non‐smoking; receiving SABA treatment only

Exclusion criteria: URTI/exacerbation of asthma within 4 weeks of study entry; asthma medication in last 2 weeks (apart from SABA); ICS in last two months; OCS in previous 3 months; females who were pregnant or lactating were excluded; skin prick +ve pts were recruited only if it was outside the season of their allergy

Interventions

FP 500 mcg/day versus SAL 100mcg per day versus PLA. All interventions given via Diskus. Study duration: 3 x 6 week treatment arms (no washout)

Outcomes

Inflammatory cell markers; symptoms; FEV1; PEF; FVC; PC20; erythema

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Katz 1998

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, Europe, Middle East and Asia, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

263 children: 166M 97F
Age range: 4‐11 years
Inclusion criteria:
Diagnosis of asthma (not otherwise defined)
Recurrent episodes of bronchoconstriction and cough
Able to use delivery device and peak flow meter satisfactorily
PEFR 75 (% predicted)or less, or PEFR 75‐90 (% predicted) with asthma symptoms during run‐in period
Exclusion criteria:
Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids within last 3 months
Oral steroids in last month
Continuous treatment with oral steroids over 2 months or more in past
Hospital admission due to asthma in last 3 months

Interventions

FP:
1. 50 mcg 2xdaily (100 mcg/d)

2. 100 mcg 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline:

FEV1
FVC
FEF 25‐75
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Daily asthma symptom score Night‐time wakening score
Daily use of beta2 agonists

Probability of remaining in study

Notes

Reply from author but unable to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, PEFR, sleep disturbance or rescue beta2 agonist use

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Kavuru 2000

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: yes
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 3

Participants

527 adults and adolescents screened, 356 randomised (four arm study; PLA: N = 82; FP: N = 90), Age range: 12‐67; Mean baseline FEV1 (% predicted): PLA: 64; FP: 64. Reversibility (%): PLA: 32; FP: 30; Therapy @ baseline: PLA: ICS ‐ 55, SAL ‐ 27; FP: ICS ‐ 63, SAL ‐ 27

Inclusion criteria: >/= 12 years of age; medical history of asthma (ATS criteria); at least 6 months duration; FEV1 between 40‐85% predicted; >/= 15% reversibility post SAB; Participants treated with ICS prior to enrolment had to have been treated with BDP 252‐420mcg/d (6‐10 puffs/d), TRA 600‐1000mcg/d (6‐10 puffs/d); FLU: 1000mcg/d (250 QID); FP 176mcg/d (44 QID) for at least 1 month prior to enrolment without change in regimen; If participants using SAL, they had to do so for at least 1 week prior to screening, and demonstrated FEV1 </= 85% predicted post SABA and not received concurrent ICS for 1 month prior to screening; provision of signed consent

Exclusion criteria: Female participants had ‐ve pregnancy test, and were sterile, post‐menopausal or using acceptable birth control measures; history of life‐threatening asthma; hypersensitivity to ICSor beta‐agonists; smoking history (>10 pack years); use of oral, inhaled (external to guidelines above) or IM CS therapy, intranasal CS (except for 'Flonase'); use of OCS in previous 6 months; use of over the counter medicines that might affect course of asthma; abnormal chest x‐ray; abnormal ECG; significant concurrent disease. During screening period, participants not eligible if they had >3 awakenings requiring asthma during 7 days immediately preceding randomisation. ICS patients not eligible if using >12 puffs SABA per day for more than 3 days, SAL patients not eligible using >6 puffs SABA per day for more than 3 days

Interventions

FP200 versus PLA. Inhaler device: Diskus. Single‐blind run‐in with a placebo (2 weeks)

Outcomes

FEV1; am PEF; pm PEF; adverse events; symptoms; ECG; rescue medication usage; withdrawals

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Kemp 2004

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 2 years
Randomisation: yes (randomisation code generated off‐site)
Allocation concealment: adequate
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind (identical)
Excluded: yes
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 5

Participants

190 adults and adolescents screened, 160 randomised (three arm study; PLA: N = 54; FP400: N = 55; FP1000: 51), Age range: 18‐50; Mean baseline FEV1 (% predicted): PLA: 83; FP100: 82; FP500: 85

Inclusion criteria: 18‐50 years (F: 18‐40); mild asthma (6 months); FEV1: 50‐100% predicted

Exclusion criteria: Significant co‐morbidity of bone; alterations in body weight; reversal of nocturnal sleepiong hours; substance abuse

Interventions

FP200 BID (400) versus FP1000 BID (1000) versus PLA. Inhaler device: MDI

Outcomes

Bome mineral density; withdrawals; adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Laforce 2000

Methods

Setting: mulitcentre study,USA
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 3

Participants

242 children screened, 192 randomised. Age range: 4‐11; FEV1 (% predicted) (mean (SEM)): FP200: 70 (0.8); FP100: 70 (1.0); Placebo: 73 (0.8); FEV1 (L) (mean (SEM)): FP200: 1.40 (0.04); FP100: 1.36 (0.04); Placebo: 1.51 (0.04); Clinic am PEF (Mean (SEM)): FP200: 208 (7); FP100: 208 (6); Placebo: 219 (7); Diary am PEF L/min (mean (SEM)): FP200: 220 (8); FP100: 222 (7); Placebo: 234 (8); Asthma symptom scores (mean (SEM)): FP200: 0.88 (0.06); FP100: 0.93 (0.07); Placebo: 0.85 (0.06); Albuterol use (puffs/day) (mean (SEM)): FP200: 2.1 (0.3); FP100: 2.0 (0.3); Placebo: 1.7 (0.2); Nighttime awakenings/night (mean (SEM)): FP200: 0.10 (0.02); FP100: 0.10 (0.02); Placebo: 0.08 (0.02)

Inclusion criteria: male and premenarchal females; ATS‐diagnosed asthma; Requirement for pharmacotherapy for 3 mo prior to start of the trial; Baseline PEF >/= 85% predicted; Baseline FEV1 50‐85% predicted; >/= 15% reversibility to albuterol or 15% variability in FEV1 within 6 months prior to the study (patients aged 6‐11); Stable asthma (no more than 3 days from preceding 7 where >/‐12 puffs of albuterol per day/6 doses of albuterol power per day; no more than 3 am PEFs more than 20% below previous pm PEF; no more than 3 nights awakening resulting from asthma

Exclusion criteria: History of life threatening asthma or other severe chronic disease; any RTI within 2 weeks prior to study; chickenpox 3 weeks prior to study; oral and parenteral steroids within 1 mo prior to study; use of methotrexate/gold salts; use Pf prescription or over the counter medication which may have affected course of asthma; participation in previous Diskus trial.

Interventions

FP200mcg QD (+ placebo for evening) versus FP 100mcg BD versus placebo. Inhaler device: Diskus. Single blind run‐in 7 days (placebo)

Outcomes

Lung function (predose am FEV1; clinic PEF ‐ measurements taken between 7am and 10am; diary PEF (am and pm); Symptoms; Rescue medication use; nighttime awakenings requiring albuterol; Adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Langley 2002

Methods

Setting: single centre study, UK
Length of intervention period: 4 weeks
Randomisation: PACT (computer‐generated package)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: crossover study
Masking: double blind, double dummy
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 5

Participants

59 adults randomised. 48 completed; mean age: 32.6 (SD 9.2); M/F: 18/30; FEV1 (L): 3.2 (SD 0.7); Duration of reversible obstruction >15 years: 32; Patients using a spacer: 4; % predicted FEV1: 93.5 (11.8); Never smoked: 28; current smoker: 3.

Inclusion criteria: Patients >/=18 years; resting FEV1: >/=60%; PD20 </=3.2MG; no significant asthma medication 4 weeks prior to study (steroids ‐ ICS, OCS, parenteral); LABA, oral beta‐agonists; methylxanthine; leukotriene antagonists); No change to regular medication in this period

Exclusion criteria: Inability to perform methacholine test (recent MI/CVA in last 3 months); Females of child‐bearing age except if using appropriate contraception; ‐ve pregnancy test

Interventions

HFA FP100mcg BID (200mcg) via either: 1) pMDI or 2)Diskhaler. Placebo given via two inhalers. Double‐dummy design maintained throughout.

Outcomes

FEV1; rescue medication usage; side effects

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Lanz 2001

Methods

Setting: single centre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 4 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: crossover study
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 4

Statistical analysis: paired t test.

Participants

18 adults randomised. Age range: 17‐63; FEV1% pre‐SABA: 75 (50‐85); Reversibility %: 25 (12‐50); M/F: 6/12; Caucasian/Hispanic: 3/15; Medications: SABA: 18; LABAs: 3; IGC in past year: 4; LT/Theo in past year: 4

Inclusion criteria: ATS diagnosed asthma; >/=12% reversibility

Exclusion criteria: Use of inhaled/nasal/oral steroids; nasal/inhaled cromolyn; LTRA/theophylline in past 4 weeks

Interventions

FP44 BID versus placebo. arms; Washout period: 4 weeks. Inhaler device: MDI

Outcomes

Exhaled NO; FEV1 %; PEF %; QoL; Symptoms; SABA usage

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Lawrence 1997

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 6 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind, double dummy
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 4

Participants

261 adults
Age range: 18‐71 years
Inclusion criteria:
Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987)
Treatment with ICS for 3 months or longer
Treatment with BDP 336 mcg/d or TA 800 mcg/d at stable dose for 2 weeks
FEV1 50‐80 (% predicted)
15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist
Exclusion criteria:
Systemic, intra‐nasal or opthalmic corticosteroids in last 2 months
Oral corticosteroids for > 2 months in last 6 months
Pregnancy

Interventions

FP:
1.100 mcg 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

2. 500 mcg 2xdaily (1000 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

Probability of remaining in study

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline:

FEV1
Morning PEFR
Daily asthma symptom score
Daily use of beta2 agonist
Morning plasma cortisol

Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

Results for continuous outcomes expressed as change to endpoint (point of withdrawal)

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning PEFR, night‐time awakenings or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Li 1999

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 2 years Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

63 adults: 55M 9F
Age range: 18‐50 years
Inclusion criteria:
Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987)
FEV1 60 (% predicted) or greater
Exclusion criteria:
Inhaled steroid use in last month
4 or more weeks of cumulative oral steroid use prior to study
More than one year of cumulative corticosteroid use via any route prior to study
Life threatening asthma or other serious concurrent disease
Glaucoma, posterior subcapsular cataracts, abnormal HPA function, abnormal lumbar spine bone mineral density
Postmenopausal or pregnant women

Interventions

FP: 500 mcg 2xdaily (1000 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

Morning plasma cortisol
8 hour area under curve (AUC) plasma cortisol during 6 hour 250 mcg co‐syntropin infusion
Peak plasma cortisol during 6 hour 250 mcg co‐syntropin infusion
Lumbar spine bone mineral density by dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry
Serum osteocalcin
Urinary N‐telopeptide/creatinine ratio
Incidence of posterior subcapsular cataracts
Change in FEV1 compared to baseline

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

ITT analysis undertaken using endpoint data

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Li 1999a

Methods

Setting: single centre study, Australia
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: computer‐generated randomisation procedure
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: triple dummy (identical inhalers)
Excluded: yes
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 5

Participants

71 adults enrolled. 50 randomised (45 completed). Age range: 18‐55; Atopy (+/‐): FP: 11/5; PLA: 12/4; Median PD20: FP: 0.021; PLA: 0.011; Median FEV1 % pred: FP: 80; PLA: 83; Symptom scores: FP: 1.39; PLA: 1.07; SABA (median puffs/day): FP: 1.82; PLA: 1.07; median am PEF (mL): FP: 420; PLA: 404; median pm PEF (mL): FP: 471; PLA: 445

Inclusion criteria: 20‐70 years of age; non‐smoker; diagnosed asthma for previous 12 months with ICS (daily does up to 500mcg BDP/BUD; baseline FEV1 >/=60% predicted; symptomatic post run‐in i.e. symptom score >2 on 7 of last 14 days; SABA more than 7 of last 14 days; variation of >/=15% PEF over 24hrs on at least 7 of last 14 days and some degree of symptoms and SABA use during that time.

Exclusion criteria: Acute RTI, change in asthma medication, admission to hospital with airways disease in previous 4 weeks

Interventions

FP200mcg/day versus placebo via diskhaler. Study duration 12 weeks. Inhaler device: unclear.

Outcomes

am PEF; FEV1; symptom; SABA usage; BAL;

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Li 1999b

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 4 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not reported)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: identical inhalers
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 4 (non‐ITT)

Jadad score: 4

Participants

128 adults randomised. Age range: 18‐53; Ethnic origin (%) (White/Other): PLA: 94/6; FP88: 95/5; FP220: 88/13; FEV1 % Predicted: PLA: 89.1; FP88: 82.5; FP220: 88.2; Concurrent medication: Salmeterol: PLA: 0; FP88: 0; FP220: 1; Theophylline: PLA: 2; FP88: 0; FP220: 3; Cromolyn: PLA: 0; FP88: 1; FP220: 1; Nedocromil: PLA: 0; FP88: 0; FP220: 1

Inclusion criteria: Non‐smokers; asthma according to ATS criteria; duration of disease >6 months; FEV1 >/=50% predicted.

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy/lactation; use of methotrexate/gold salts; use of inhaled cromolyn/nedocromil; use of oral, intranasal, inhaled or injectable steroids <4 weeks of study commencement; use of >/= 140mg prednisone or equivalent dosage in past year; significant concomitant illness; immunotherapy requiring change in dosage regimen within 12 weeks; reversal of nocturnal sleeping hours; concurrent use of over‐the‐counter medication that might affect course of asthma or interact with sympathomimetic amines or confound cortisol assay.

Interventions

FP88 versus FP220 versus Placebo. Inhaler device: pMDI + spacer.

Outcomes

HPA axis function; plasma concentration; area under the curve; adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Lindqvist 2003

Methods

Setting: dual centre study, Finland
Length of intervention period: 16 weeks
Randomisation: yes (not reported)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 3

Participants

83 adults enrolled, 80 randomised (four treatment arms; SAL, DCSG, FP & PLA); age range: 18‐60; asthma duration: <2 years; FEV1 % predicted: 81 (SEM 1.2).

Inclusion criteria: 18‐60 years of age; newly diagnosed symptomatic ATS defined asthma (within previous 2 years); FEV1 60‐100%; moderate‐severe BHR; non‐smoker;

Exclusion criteria: Rx with LABA or cromones in previous 4 weeks; ICS/OCS in 2 months prior to study; RTI or exacerbation of asthma; seasonal allergy

Interventions

SAL, FP250 BID (1000mcg/d); DSCG 5mg BID; PLA. Inhaler device: not reported

Outcomes

Eosinophils; lymphocytes; Tenascin; PD15; amPEF; Symptoms; rescue medication usage

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Lipworth 2005

Methods

Seting: multicentre study in USA
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

82 adults with mild to moderate asthma. Mean age: 36 years; FEV1: 81.7%.

Inclusion criteria: >/‐18 years; mild to moderate persistent asthma; acceptable inhaler technique; SABA only for 6 months (at least 2 x daily); FEV1 >/=70% predicted

Exclusion criteria: systemic steroid use within 6 months of screening; inhaled steroids within 2 months

Interventions

1. FP880mcg/d
2. Placebo

Inhaler device: MDI without a spacer

Outcomes

Hypothalmic pituitary axis function; serum cortisol; safety

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

MacKenzie 1993

Methods

Setting: multicentre study Europe and South Africa, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 4 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

258 children: 170M 88F
Age range: 6‐14 years
Inclusion criteria:
Asthma judged to require regular therapy with either a bronchodilator or a prophylactic agent
Experienced a worsening of asthma i.e.. marked deterioration in lung function leading to a change in medication or hospitalisation in the last month
20% or greater diurnal variation in PEFR or symptoms during 4 out of 7 days of run‐in period
Exclusion criteria:
Use of inhaled corticosteroids in previous 6 months
Course of oral steroids on more than 2 occasions in the previous 3 months
Lower respiratory tract infection in the last 2 weeks
Unstable concurrent disease

Interventions

FP: 50 mcg 1 actuation 2xdaily (100 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

FEV1
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Clinic PEFR
Daily asthma symptom score
Serum cortisol

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

ITT analysis

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Micheletto 2000

Methods

Setting: Single centre study
Length of intervention period: 4 weeks
Randomisation: no stated
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: not stated

Jadad score: 0

Participants

24 adults randomised. Age range: 19‐51; FEV1% predicted: FP: 73.1 (SD 5.3); PLA: 74.2 (SD 13.2)

Inclusion criteria: not reported

Exclusion criteria: not reported

Interventions

FP250 BID versus PLA BID via Diskhaler.

Outcomes

Exhaled NO; FEV1 % predicted

Notes

Unpublished conference. Pending confirmation from trialists of randomisation.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Nathan 1999

Methods

Setting: two multicentre studies USA
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: no details
Withdrawals: no details
Baseline characteristics: no details
Jadad score: 2

Participants

705 adults
Age range: not stated
Inclusion criteria:
Diagnosis of asthma
No further details
Exclusion criteria:
No details

Interventions

Study A
FP: 100 mcg 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Study B
FP: 250 mcg 2xdaily (500 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: Accuhaler DPI

Outcomes

Withdrawal due to worsening asthma (% of patients)

Notes

Report of two studies in abstract form only

Study A also included treatment arms with salmeterol/FP combination (Seretide) 50/100 mcg 2xdaily, and salmeterol 50 mcg 2xdaily
Study B also included treatment arms with Seretide 50/250 mcg 2xdaily, and salmeterol 50 mcg 2xdaily

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Nathan 2000

Methods

Setting: mulitcentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes (not reported ‐ participants randomised according to baseline therapy: ICS or ß‐2)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 3

Participants

330 adults and adolescents randomised. Gender (% M:F): PLA: 56:44; FP100: 65:35; FP200: 56:44; FP500: 55:45; Age range: 12‐75; FEV1 L: PLA: 2.22 (SEM 0.06); FP100: 2.40 (0.07); FP200: 2.21 (SEM 0.07); FP500: 2.26 (SEM 0.05); FEV1 % predicted: PLA: 62.6 (SEM 1.07); FP100: 64.3 (SEM 0.89); FP200: 63.3 (SEM 1.03); FP500: 63.7 (SEM 0.96); am PEF (L/min): PLA: 394 (SEM 10); FP100: 397 (SEM 10); FP200: 395 (SEM 10); FP500: 379 (SEM 10); pm PEF (L/min): PLA: 412 (SEM 10); FP100: 420 (SEM 10); FP200: 414 (SEM 10); FP500: 404 (SEM 10); Asthma symptom scores: PLA: 1.10 (SEM 0.07); FP100: 1.18 (SEM 0.06); FP200: 1.03 (SEM 0.07); FP500: 1.08 (SEM 0.07); Albuterol use (puffs/d): PLA: 3.05 (SEM 0.26); FP100: 3.43 (SEM 0.26); FP200: 2.62 (SEM 0.24); FP500: 3.18 (SEM 0.26); Nighttime awakenings, No. (%): PLA: 0.09 (SEM 0.02); FP100: 0.08 (SEM 0.02); FP200: 0.12 (SEM 0.02); FP500: 0.10 (SEM 0.02)

Interventions

Inhaled FP100mcg QD versus FP200mcg QD versus FP500mcg QD versus placebo. Diskus inhaler.

Outcomes

Lung function (FEV1; am PEF; pm PEF); asthma symptoms; albuterol use; nighttime awakenings; withdrawals; safety; HPA axis function

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Nelson 1999

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 16 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

111 adults: 44M 67F
Age range: 12‐77 years
Inclusion criteria:
12 years of age or older
Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987)
Dependent on oral corticosteroids for asthma control for 6 months or longer
Requiring 5‐40 mg/day oral prednisolone
FEV1 40‐80 (% predicted) 15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist
Exclusion criteria:
Life‐threatening asthma or other severe concurrent disease
Use of intra‐nasal, injectable, topical corticosteroids
Methotrexate, cyclosporin, azathioprine, troleandomycin within last 3 months

Interventions

FP:
1. 500 mcg 2xdaily (1000 mcg/d)

2. 1000 mcg 2xdaily (2000 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: Accuhaler DPI

Outcomes

100% reduction in daily dose oral prednisolone (% of patients)

Outcomes reported as a change compared to baseline:

Daily dose oral prednisolone
FEV1
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Daily asthma symptom score
Daily beta2 agonist use
Night‐time awakenings
Health status: Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)

Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

Usual ICS discontinued at randomisation

A priori criteria for prednisolone dose reduction based on FEV1 (% predicted), PEFR (% predicted), number of night‐time awakenings, beta‐2 agonist use compared to run in period values

Patients were withdrawn from the study if they experienced asthma exacerbation requiring hospital admission, or 3 bursts of oral prednisolone due to exacerbation

ITT analysis

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Nielsen 2002

Methods

Setting: multicentre study
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes (not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: not stated (ITT)

Jadad score: 2

Participants

N=337 (PLA: 83; HFA FP88: 87; HFA FP220: 87; HFA FP440: 80

Inclusion criteria: >/=12 years old; prior ICS therapy

Interventions

HFA FP88 BID (172) versus HFA FP 220 BID (440) versus HFA FP 440 BID (880) versus HFA placebo. Inhaler device: MDI.

Outcomes

Quality of life (AQLQ)

Notes

Unpublished conference abstract

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Noonan 1995

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 16 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 4

Participants

96 adults: 46M 50F
Mean age: 50‐52 years
Inclusion criteria:
12 years of age or older
Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987)
Dependent on oral corticosteroids for asthma control for 6 months or longer
FEV1 40‐80 (% predicted)
Documented evidence of previous attempts to reduce oral steroid dose
Exclusion criteria:
Use of methotrexate, gold salts or troleandomycin in last 3 months
Nasal corticosteroid use
10 pack year history of smoking or greater
Pregnancy or lactation

Interventions

FP:
1. 750 mcg 2xdaily (1500 mcg/d)

2. 1000 mcg 2xdaily (2000 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: MDI

Outcomes

100% reduction in daily oral steroid use (% patients)

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline:

Daily oral prednisolone dose
FEV1
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Daily use of beta2 agonists
Daily asthma symptom score
Health Status: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF‐36)

Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

Usual ICS discontinued at randomisation

Daily dose oral prednsiolone reduced according to pre‐defined criteria

ITT analysis

An uncontrolled one year open label study was undertaken following the randomised 16 week trial, when all patients received FP 2000 mcg/d. Results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Noonan 1998

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 8 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

138 adults: 84M 54F
Age range: 12‐59 years
Inclusion criteria:
12 years of age or older
Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987) 6 months or longer
FEV1 60 (% predicted) or greater
15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist
Methacholine BHR (PD20 FEV1) < 18 mg
Asthma stability during run in period based on a priori defined criteria related to PEFR, medication requirement and symptoms
Exclusion criteria:
Recent hospitalisation due to asthma exacerbation
Treatment with corticosteroids, theophylline, sodium cromoglycate, nedocromil
Pregnancy

Interventions

FP:
1. 50 mcg 2xdaily (100 mcg/d)

2. 100 mcg 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: MDI

Outcomes

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline:

FEV1
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Methacholine BHR (log e PD20 FEV1)
Daily asthma symptom score
Daily use of beta2 agonist
Night‐time awakenings

Probability of remaining in study

Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning PEFR, night‐time awakenings or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

MDI's used for all interventions. Formulations of FP with 1% lecthin and 10% lecthin used. Only data for 1% formulation included in meta‐analysis

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

O'Shaughnessy 1993

Methods

Setting: UK, hospital outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 2 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: crossover, 3 week washout
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: no demographic data presented
Jadad score: 3

Participants

11 subjects: 6M 5F
Age range: 21 to 39 years
Inclusion criteria:
Adult patients with mild asthma
Non‐smokers
FEV1 60 (% predicted) or greater
Histamine BHR (PC20 FEV1) 8mg/ml or less
Skin prick test positive to either grass pollen or Dermatophagoides
Exclusion criteria:
Use of inhaled steroids within last 3 months

Interventions

FP: 1000 mcg/d

Placebo

Delivery device: MDI+spacer

Outcomes

Histamine bronchial responsiveness (change in doubling dose log 2 PC20 FEV1)
Histamine bronchial responsiveness (change in doubling dose log 2 PC20 FEV1) following inhaled allergen challenge
Maximal % fall in FEV1 within 2 hours compared to test baseline following inhaled allergen challenge: Early asthmatic response
Maximal % fall in FEV1 compared to test baseline 2 to 10 hours following inhaled allergen challenge: Late asthmatic response
Urinary leukotriene E4 excretion index

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Oliveri 1997

Methods

Setting: Italy, hospital outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 6 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

20 adults
Age range: 18‐50 years
Inclusion criteria:
Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987)
FEV1 > 80 (% predicted)
15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist
Free of asthma attacks for at least 2 months
Rescue beta2 agonist < 2 puffs/d and < 10% variability in FEV1 during 2 week run in period
Exclusion criteria:
ICS in last 6 months
Respiratory tract infection in last month
Smokers

Interventions

FP: 250 mcg 2xdaily (500 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: not stated

Outcomes

Methacholine BHR (PC20 FEV1)
BAL differential cell count, ICAM‐1 and Mac‐1 expression
BAL tryptase and ECP levels
Bronchial biopsy differential cell count and basement membrane thickness

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Overbeek 1996

Methods

Setting: The Netherlands, hospital outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

33 subjects: 23 male 10 female
Age range: 18‐56 years
Inclusion criteria:
Adult asthmatic patients
At least one positive skin‐prick test to a panel of common aero‐allergens
Methacholine BHR (PC20 FEV1) 8 mg/ml or less
9% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist
Exclusion criteria:
Exacerbation of asthma or respiratory tract infection in last month

Interventions

FP: 500 mcg 2xdaily (1000 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

Methacholine BHR (log 2 PC20 FEV1)

Change in FEV1 as percentage of initial FEV1, per doubling dose methacholine post methacholine challenge

% fall in FEV1 post methacholine challenge compared to test baseline FEV1

Daily asthma symptom score

FEV1

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Parameswaren 2000

Methods

Setting: Single centre study, Canada
Length of intervention period: 2 weeks
Randomisation: computer generated codes
Allocation concealment: off‐site
Design: crossover study
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 5

Participants

10 adults randomised (6 male). Mean age: 25 (SD 9.14); mean FEV1 (% predicted): 90.2 (SD 14.33); Mean PC20: 2.56 (SD 1.76). All patients were non‐smokers. Study took place out of allergy season. Beta‐agonist withheld at least 8 hours before each visit. Participants instructed to refrain from rigorous exercise and caffeine in am before visits to laboratory.

Inclusion criteria: Mild stable asthma: Few or no symptoms, inhaled SABA prn, FEV1 </= 70% predicted; moderate to borderline methacholine airway hyperresponsiveness

Interventions

Four visit run‐in period: control inhalation test and allergen inhalation test; Randomisation to either: Pretreatment with FP 250mcg 30 mins before allergen challenge followed by 2 weeks of FP 250mcg BID, and allergen inhalation test at end of treatment or Treatment 2: Pretreatment with placebo 30 mins before allergen inhalation test followed by 2 weeks treatment with placebo. Three week washout period before crossover. Inhaler device not described

Outcomes

FEV1; PC20; Sputum inflammatory markers

Notes

Investigator may have noted effects of active treatment on airway responses

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Pauwels 2002

Methods

Setting: single centre study, Belgium
Length of intervention period: 1 weeks
Randomisation: yes (not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: crossover study
Masking: double blind, double dummy
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: not stated

Jadad score: 2

Participants

N=26, Other details not reported

Interventions

Ciclesonide (400mcg QID; 800mcg QID; 800mcg QID), FP500 BID & FP1000 BID or PLA.

Outcomes

% Cortisol suppression; PC20

Notes

Unpublished conference abstract

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Pearlman 1997

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

342 subjects randomised
Age range: 12‐72 years
Inclusion criteria:
Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987)
Required maintenance inhaled corticosteroids for at least 3 months
FEV1 50‐80 (%predicted)
15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist
During last 7 days of run‐in period:
No more than 12 puffs per day of albuterol
No more than 4 morning PEFR 20% less than previous evenings
No more than 2 nights wakening due to asthma requiring inhaled albuterol
adequate compliance with study medication
Exclusion criteria:
Previous use of gold or methotrexate for control of asthma
Inhaled cromoglycate or oral steroids in the last 4 weeks
Significant co‐existent illness
Pregnancy or lactation

Interventions

FP:
1. 50 mcg 1 actuation 2xdaily (100 mcg/d)

2. 100mcg 1 actuation 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

3. 250 mcg 1 actuation 2xdaily (500 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline:

FEV1
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Daily asthma symptom score
Night‐time awakenings
Daily use of beta2 agonist
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form‐36, acute version (SF‐36A)
Living with Asthma Questionnaire (LWA‐20)
Validated sleep scale

Probability of remaining in study

Physician global assessment of efficacy

Plasma cortisol
Plasma cortisol 30‐60 min post 250 mcg iv cosyntropin
Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning PEFR, night‐time awakenings or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Pearlman 1999

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 4 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not reported)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated (ITT)

Jadad score: 3

Participants

N = 136 (PLA: 23; FP88: 23; FP220: 23; SAL: 21; SAL/FP88: 25; SAL/FP220: 21).Mean age (range): PLA: 35 (12‐62); SAL: 29 (15‐57); FP88: 27 (13‐50); FP220: 32 (14‐61); SAL/FP88: 33 (14‐60); SAL/FP220: 26 (13‐52); Gender (M:F %): PLA: 43:57; SAL42: 67:33; FP88: 74:26; FP220: 57:43; SAL/FP88: 40:60; SAL/FP220: 67:33; Mean FEV1 (% predicted): PLA: 68; SAL: 70; FP88: 69; FP220: 65; SAL/FP88: 67; SAL/FP220: 69.

Inclusion criteria: >/=12 years of age; ATS defined asthma (at least 6 months), requiring medical treatment; FEV1 between 50‐80% predicted; >/=15% increase in FEV1 post‐SABA; treatment with prn SABA; female participants had ‐ve pregnancy tests and either surgically sterile, postmenopausal at 1 year or using acceptable birth control for 1 month prior to participation

Exclusion criteria: History of life‐threatening asthma; hypersensitivity reaction to beta‐agonists/corticosteroids; smoking within previous year/history >10 pack years; use of OCS/ICS or parenteral steroids (except for Flonase); use of steroid therapy in previous month; OCS treatment in previous 6 months; use of OTC medication that may affect the course of asthma; abnormal CXR; clinically significant abnormal 12‐lead ECG; history of concurrent disease (glaucoma, diabetes + hypertension)

Interventions

PLA versus FP88mcg versus FP220mcg versus SAL42mcg/FP88mcg versus SAL42mcg/FP220mcg daily. Inhaler device: MDI.

Outcomes

FEV1; Am PEF; Symptoms; % days without asthma; % nights awakening due to asthma; rescue medication use; adverse effects

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Pearlman 2002

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not reported)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 3

Participants

415 adults and adolescents randomised; Mean FEV1 % predicted: PLA: 65.6; FP172: 65.3; FP440: 65.5; FP880: 66.2; mean am PEF (l/min): PLA: 346; FP172: 334; FP440: 329; FP880: 333.1

Inclusion criteria: >/=12 years; asthma for >6 months requiring tx with ICS for >/=3 months; FEV1: 45‐80% predicted; >/=12% reversibility

Exclusion criteria: not reported

Interventions

HFA FP88 BID (172 mcg/d) versus HFA FP220 BID (440) versus HFA FP440 BID (880). Study duration: 12 weeks. Inhaler device: MDI

Outcomes

am PEF; FEV1 (% predicted)

Notes

Unpublished conference abstract

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Pearlman 2004

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not reported)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: not stated (ITT)

Jadad score: 2

Participants

N = 360. No details on distribution between the groups provided. Participants described as symptomatic. Baseline medication: prn SABA alone: 142; SAL: 84; ICS: 134)

Inclusion criteria: FEV1 40‐85% predicted; Reversibility: >/=15%. No other details provided

Exclusion criteria: not listed

Interventions

CFC FP88 BID (176mcg/d) versus HFA PLA. Inhaler device: MDI. 2 week run‐in.

Outcomes

am PEF; probability of remaining in the study; withdrawals due to worsening asthma; FEV1; AUC

Notes

Unpublished conference abstract

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Peden 1998

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, paediatric outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind, double dummy
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

437 children: 268M 169F
Age range: 4‐11 years
Inclusion criteria:
History of chronic asthma (ATS criteria 1987)
Symptoms requiring maintenance therapy for 3 months or more
PEFR 85 (% predicted) or greater
FEV1 50‐85 (% predicted)
15% or greater improvement in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist
Asthma stability during run‐in period, based on a priori beta2 agonist use and morning PEFR
Exclusion criteria:
Life‐threatening asthma
Severe concurrent disease
Systemic steroids in last month
Previous treatment with methotrexate or gold

Interventions

FP:
1. 50mcg 2xdaily (100 mcg/d) via Accuhaler DPI

2. 100mcg 2xdaily (200mcg/d) via Accuhaler DPI

3. 50 mcg 2xdaily (100 mcg/d) via Diskhaler DPI

4. 100 mcg 2xdaily (200 mcg/d) via Diskhaler DPI

Placebo: 2xdaily, Diskhaler and Diskus/Accuhaler

Outcomes

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline:

FEV1
FEV1 (% predicted)
Morning PEFR
Morning PEFR (% predicted)
Evening PEFR
Daily asthma symptom score
Daily use of beta2 agonist
Night‐time awakening score

Morning plasma cortisol
Total urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours)

Probability of remaining in study

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

Only data concerning FP v placebo delivered via Accuhaler has been included in the meta‐analysis

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Rooklin 2001

Methods

Setting: multicentre study
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not reported)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: not stated (ITT)

Jadad score: 2

Participants

365 adults and adolescents randomised. Age range: 12‐82 years. Unclear distribution between the treatment groups. Age range: 12‐82 years. M/F (%): 40/60; Caucasian: 84%; mean FEV1 68%; Reversibility: 28%

Inclusion criteria: FP440‐660 mcg/d for at least 3 months prior to study entry; FEV1 40‐85%; reversibility >=15%

Interventions

Combination HFA FP/SAL 110/42 BID (220/84) versus CFC SAL 42 BID (84) versus CFC FP 110 BID (220) versus HFA PLA. Inhaler devices: MDI. Run‐in: 2 weeks

Outcomes

Remaining in study; AUC; withdrawals due to deterioration; FEV1

Notes

Unpublished conference abstract

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

SAS30021

Methods

Setting: multicentre study in North & South America.
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not reported)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated (ITT)

Jadad score: 3

Participants

608 children. Mean age: 7.6‐7 years; am PEF: 75.2‐76.6% predicted.

Inclusion criteria: 4‐11 years; diagnosis of asthma for 6 months; treated with SABA or non‐ICS controller only for 1 month prior to screening; am PEF: 50‐85% predicted; >/=15% reversibility post SABA; symptoms on 4 days of previous week/use of SABA on 4 days of previous week

Interventions

1. FP 100 once daily
2. Placebo

Inhaler device: DPI

Outcomes

am & pm PEF; symptoms; SABA usage; adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

SAS30024

Methods

Setting: multicentre study (28 countries in North & South America, Asia, Europe, Africa & Australia)
Length of intervention period: 52 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not reported)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double‐blind, double dummy
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated (ITT)

Jadad score: 3

Participants

1295 adolescents and adults with mild asthma (block randomisation 3:1)
Age range: 12‐79 years

Inclusion criteria: 12‐79 years; documented history of asthma >/=6 months; SABA prn; pre‐BD PEF >/=80% predicted; symptom score >/=1 on 3‐6 days during last 7 daysof run‐in; reversibility of >/=15% PEF

Interventions

FP 100 BID versus Placebo
Inhaler device: Diskus/Accuhaler

Outcomes

am PEF; symptoms; FEF25‐75; FEV1; rescue medication use; adverse events; exacerbation rates

Notes

Unpublished data

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Shapiro 2000

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not reported)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals: stated (ITT)

Jadad score: 3

Participants

484 adults and adolescents screened. 349 randomised (four treatment arm study; PLA: 93; FP: 84. Data from 13 participants excluded from the analysis due to poor procedure at one site). M/F %: PLA: 41/59; FP250: 54/46; age range: 12‐69; FEV1 mean % predicted (% reversibility): PLA: 68 (29); FP250: 66 (28); FEV1 L: PLA: 2.19 (SE 0.07); FP250: 2.12 (0.06); Symptom scores: PLA: 1.6 (SE 0.12); FP250: 1.6 (SE 0.12); SABA usage (puffs/d): PLA: 3.8 (0.3); FP250: 3.2 (0.3)

Inclusion criteria: >/=12 years; ATS defined asthma of >/=6 mo duration requiring pharmacotherapy for at least 6 months; FEV1 between 40 and 85% predicted; >/=15% increase in FEV1 30 mins after 2 puffs of albuterol; use of ICS 12 weeks prior to the study.

Exclusion criteria: Females with negative pregnancy tests; life‐threatening asthma; hypersensitivity to sympathomimetic drugs/steroids; smoking within previous year; smoking history of >10 pack years; use of oral/injectable steroid therapy within 1 month of study; use of daily oral steroids within 6 months prior to the study; use of any prescription or over the counter medication that could have affected asthma or course of treatment; abnormal CXR; clinically significant abnormal 12‐lead ECGs history of concurrent disease.

Interventions

PLA versus FP250 BID (500mcg/d) via Diskus inhaler. Duration: 12 weeks

Outcomes

FEV1; PEF; AUC; Symptoms; Rescue medication usage; Adverse Effects

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Sheffer 1996

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period:
Randomisation: yes, computer generated sequence
Allocation concealment: yes
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 5

Participants

307 patients: 185M 122F
Age range: 12‐72 years
Inclusion criteria:
Diagnosis of asthma requiring at least 3 months of regular therapy
FEV1 45‐75 (% predicted)
15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist
Exclusion criteria:
More than 1 month's use of oral steroids in the past
Any oral, topical or inhaled steroid or cromoglycate in last month
Previous history of life threatening asthma
Pregnancy or lactation

Interventions

FP:
1. 25 mcg 1 puff 2xdaily (50 mcg/d)

2. 50 mcg 1 puff 2xdaily (100 mcg/d)

3. 50 mcg 2 puffs 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: MDI

Outcomes

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline:

FEV1
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Night‐time awakenings
Daily wheeze score
Daily cough score
Daily breathlessness score
Daily use of beta2 agonists

Probability of remaining in study

Notes

Randomisation details confirmed by author

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning and evening PEFR, diurnal variability in PEFR, night‐time awakenings or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Sorkness 1999

Methods

Setting: multicentre study
Length of intervention period: 4 weeks
Randomisation: computer‐generated randomisation
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: matching inhalers
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 5 (ITT)

Participants

168 adults randomised (N for treatment groups considered by the review: Placebo: 30; FP100: 27; FP500: 30); Mean age (SE): PLA: 27.9 (1.6); FP100: 27.7 (1.7); FP500: 28.2 (1.6); Gender (M/F): PLA: 26/4; FP100: 26/1; FP500: 24/6; Race (White/other %): PLA: 67/33; FP100: 81/19; FP500: 77/23; FEV1 % predicted (SE): PLA: 87 (2.5); FP100: 88 (3.1); FP500: 83 (3.9)

Inclusion criteria: 18‐51 years of age; documented diagnosis of asthma (>/=6 months according to ATS criteria; FEV1 at least 50% predicted

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy or lactation; corticosteroid/immunosuppressive therapy for 3 months prior to study entry; use of 140mg prednisone or equivalent in any dosage or form in previous year; current/prior use of antiasthma medication other than beta‐agonists, theophylline or cromolyn sodium; historical or current evidence of significant concomitant disease; use of oral contraceptives or other hormonal therapy; current use of prescription or over the counter medication known to interact with corticosteroids or to cause an abnormal response to exogenous glucocorticoids or reversal of normal nocturnal sleeping hours

Interventions

FP100 versus FP500 versus Placebo. Delivery device: Rotadisk.

Outcomes

AUC; Plasma cortisol; withdrawals; adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Sorkness 1999a

Methods

Setting: multicentre study
Length of intervention period: 4 weeks
Randomisation: computer‐generated randomisation
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: matching inhalers
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 5 (ITT)

Participants

119 adults randomised (N for treatment groups considered by the review: PLA: 31; FP100: 29; FP250: 30); Mean age (SE): PLA: 32.1 (1.7); FP100: 31.4 (1.8); FP250: 33 (1.6); Gender (M/F): PLA: 25/6; FP100: 26/3; FP250: 26/4; Race (White/other %): PLA: 94/6; FP100: 93/7; FP250: 90/10; FEV1 % predicted (SE): PLA: 87 (2.7); FP100: 86 (2.7); FP250: 88 (3)

Inclusion criteria: 18‐51 years of age; documented diagnosis of asthma (>/=6 months according to ATS criteria; FEV1 at least 50% predicted

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy or lactation; corticosteroid/immunosuppressive therapy for 3 months prior to study entry; use of 140mg prednisone or equivalent in any dosage or form in previous year; current/prior use of antiasthma medication other than beta‐agonists, theophylline or cromolyn sodium; historical or current evidence of significant concomitant disease; use of oral contraceptives or other hormonal therapy; current use of prescription or over the counter medication known to interact with corticosteroids or to cause an abnormal response to exogenous glucocorticoids or reversal of normal nocturnal sleeping hours

Interventions

FP100 versus FP500 versus Placebo. Delivery device: Rotadisk.

Outcomes

AUC; Plasma cortisol; withdrawals; adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Sovijärvi 2003

Methods

Setting: single centre study, Finland
Length of intervention period: 6 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: not stated

Jadad score: 2

Participants

26 adults randomised. Age range: 21‐59; M/F: FP: 4/9; PLA: 7/6; Atopic asthma: FP: 9/13; PLA: 10/13; Mean duration of reversible airway obstruction (years): FP: 12.9 (0.1‐37); PLA: 8 (0.1‐33); FEV1 % pred: FP: 79.3 (70‐88); PLA: 84.3 (69‐100); am PEF: FP: 81 (64‐99); PLA: 92 (71‐112); pm PEF: FP: 83 (63‐99); PLA: 95 (72‐116); Symptoms (DAY): FP: 0.12; PLA: 0.27; Symptoms (NIGHT): FP: 0.46; PLA: 0.51. Rescue medication usage (puffs/week): FP: 3.8; PLA: 4.6

Inclusion criteria: >/=18 years; improvement by 15% in FEV1/PEF; FEV1 >/=65% predicted; 15% fall in FEV1 at a dose of </=0.6mg

Exclusion criteria: Seasonal/unstable angina; RTI; exacerbation of asthma during 4 weeks prior to study entry; current smoking/cessation of smoking within year preceding study; history of pulmonary disease other than asthma; use of ICS/OCS, inhaled cromones, anti‐leux for 2 months prior to study; use of antihistamines within 2 weeks, and LABAs within 4 weeks of study entry; pregnancy or breast feeding; severe/chronic disease; alcohol or drug abuse

Interventions

FP250 BID (500) versus placebo. Inhaler device: MDI + spacer. Run‐in: 1‐2 weeks (usual asthma medication and monitoring symptoms)

Outcomes

PD15; FEV1 % predicted; PEF; Symptoms; rescue medication usage

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

van Grunsven 2000

Methods

Setting: Single centre study
Length of intervention period: 12 months
Randomisation: yes (method not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: yes
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 2

Participants

45 adults screened, 29 randomised (N for FP500mcg or Placebo not reported); Age range: 30‐70; 10M, 19F; FEV1 % predicted: 93 (SD 11); Pack years (mean): 7 (0‐31); PC20 histamine (mg/mL): 5.3 (SD 3.5); Reversibility FEV1 % predicted: 5 (SD 3); Symptoms: 0.6 (SD 0.9); Bronchodilators y/n: 2/27

Inclusion criteria: Bronchial hperresponsiveness (concentration of Methcholine causing a 20% reduction in FEV1 histamine </= 8mg/mL and/or reversibility of obstruction (increase in FEV1 by 10% as percentage of FEV1 predicted after application of 800mcg inhaled salbutamol

Exclusion criteria: Not reported

Interventions

FP500 or placebo via diskhaler.

Outcomes

Compliance

Notes

No outcomes of interest measured adequately in published trial report.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

van Rensen 1999

Methods

Setting: Single centre study, Netherlands
Length of intervention period: 4 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not reported)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 3

Participants

25 adults randomsied (FP 1500: 12; Placebo: 13); Mean age: FP 1500: 23.3 (SD 2.4); Placebo: 25.1 (SD 3.9); FEV % predicted: FP1500: 96.2 (SD 9); Placebo: 95.6 (SD 10.6); PC20: FP1500: 0.91 (SD 1.62); Placebo: 0.52 (SD 1.38); Eosinophils %: FP1500: 2.85 (SD 2.46); Placebo: 4.91 (SD 8.98); NO (ppb): FP1500: 6.30 (SD 3.34); Placebo: 7.47 (SD 4.37)

Inclusion criteria: Stable (symptom free and free from RTI) for two weeks previously; Atopic disease (>3 mm weal); FEV1 % predicted >75% predicted; hyperresponsiveness to inhaled histamine

Interventions

FP 500mcg per day versus Placebo. Inhaler device: unclear

Outcomes

PC20; Sputum eosinophils; Exhaled NO

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Van Schoor 2002

Methods

Setting: Belgium, hospital outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 2 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: crossover, one month washout
Masking: double blind
Excluded: no details
Withdrawals: no details
Baseline characteristics: no demographic data presented
Jadad score: 2

Participants

N=11. Mean FEV1: 3.2 (SEM 0.16); FEV1 % pred: 88 (SEM 3.44). Mean methacholine log2 PC20: ‐5.96 (SEM 0.2). Mean NKA (neurokronin A) log2 PC20 : ‐12.71 (SEM 0.63); Gender: 4M 11F; mean age: 27.5 years

Inclusion criteria: Adults (no age threshold defined ‐ all participants recruited were over 18 years); mild to moderate asthma (NHLBI 1997 guideline definition); non‐ or ex‐smokers (</=5 pack years, and ceased smoking >/=1 year prior to study entry); females of child‐bearing required to be using reliable contraception

Exclusion criteria: pregnant/lactating women.

Interventions

Inhaled FP500 BID versus PLA. Inhaler devices: Diskhaler. Study duration: 2 x 14 day treatment periods. Washout: 4 weeks. Only prn SABAs allowed as concomitant therapy.

Outcomes

FEV1; Methacholine BHR (PC20 FEV1); Neurokinin A BHR (log 10 PC20 FEV1)

Notes

Data on FEV1 presented at end of 1st arm

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Ward 2001

Methods

Setting: single centre study, Australia
Length of intervention period:
Randomisation: computer‐generated randomisation schedule
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: identical inhalers
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 5

Participants

35 adults enrolled, 34 randomised. Age range: 20‐70; Mean FEV1 % pred: 91.3 (SEM 3). No patients had received LABAs or ICS for at least 3 months prior to the study. 34/35 patients had not had OCS treatment in previous 12 months. 1 patient had received OCS treatment within 3 months before the study.

Inclusion criteria: mild‐moderate symptomatic asthma

Exclusion criteria: not reported

Interventions

Inhaled FP 1500 versus PLA. Inhaler device: MDI. Study duration: 12 months (preceded by 14‐day run in)

Outcomes

FEV1, MMFEF25‐75, withdrawals, adverse events, PD20, BAL inflammatory cell counts, membrane thickening

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Wasserman 1996

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, primary care and hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

331 adults randomised, 265 completed: 265M 66F
Age range 12‐74 years
Inclusion criteria:
Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987) for at least 6 months
FEV1 50‐80 (% predicted)
15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist
During run‐in:
12 or less puffs/day albuterol
4 or less mornings when PEFR decreased 20% or less than previous night PEFR
2 or less nights wakening requiring albuterol
Good compliance
Exclusion criteria:
Smoking
Use of any oral, inhaled or topical steroid within last month of study
Oral steroids for 2 months or longer within last 6 month

Interventions

FP:
1. 50 mcg 1 actuation 2xdaily (100 mcg/d)

2. 100 mcg 1 actuation 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

3. 250 mcg 1 actuation 2xdaily (500 mcg/d)

Placebo: 1 actuation 2xdaily

Delivery device: Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline:

FEV1
FVC
FEF 25‐75%
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Daily asthma score
Change in night time awakenings
Daily use of beta2 agonist

Probability of remaining in study

Physician global assessment of efficacy

Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning PEFR, night‐time awakenings or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Wolfe 1996

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

304 adults: 169M 135F
Age range: 12‐87 years
Inclusion criteria:
12 years of age or older
Diagnosis of moderate asthma, for at least 6 months
Current treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and regular/as needed beta2 agonists
Exclusion criteria:
During run‐in period:
More than 12 puffs albuterol daily for 3 or more days
Diurnal variation in PEFR > 20% for 4 or more days
Awakening more than 2 nights due to asthma symptoms
And:
Systemic steroids in last month
Significant concurrent disease
Pregnancy or lactation

Interventions

FP:
1. 100 mcg 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

2. 250 mcg 2xdaily (500 mcg/d)

3. 500 mcg 2xdaily (1000 mcg/d)

Placebo: 2xdaily

Delivery device: MDI

Outcomes

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline:

FEV1
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Daily use of beta2 agonist
Daily cough score
Daily wheezing score
Daily breathlessness score
Daily asthma symptom score

Probability of remaining in the study

Physician related global assessment of efficacy

Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Morning plasma cortisol

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning PEFR, night‐time awakenings or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Wolfe 2000 BD

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes (not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind, double dummy
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 4

Participants

390 adults and adolescents screened. 253 randomised; Gender M/F (%): PLA: 63/37; FP100BID: 58/42; FP200QD: 47/43. Mean age: PLA: 33; FP100BID: 33; FP200QD: 35; FEV1 (L): PLA: 2.62 (SEM 0.07); FP100BID: 2.6 (SEM 0.07); FP200QD: 2.58 (SEM 0.07); FEV1 % predicted: PLA: 68.52 (SEM 0.94); FP100BID: 68.79 (Sem 1.05); FP200QD: 67.72 (SEM 0.99); am PEF (L/min): PLA: 428 (SEM 10); FP100BID: 434 (SEM 13); FP200QD: 434 (SEM 11); pm PEF (L/min): PLA: 449 (SEM 11); FP100BID: 454 (SEM 12); FP200QD: 452 (SEM 11). Rescue medication usage (puffs/d): PLA: 2.66 (SEM 0.3); FP100BID: 2.46 (SEM 0.26); FP200QD: 2.25 (SEM 0.28); Nocturnal awakenings: PLA: 0.11 (SEM 0.03); FP100BID: 0.1 (0.02); FP200QD: 0.09 (0.01)

Inclusion criteria: >/=12 years old; diagnosis of asthma based upon ATS criteria; requirement for pharmacotherapy for 6 months; BD ‐ study: no steroid treatment for 1 month prior to study entry; FEV1 50‐80% predicted; reversibility >/=15%

Exclusion criteria: pregnancy/lactation; use of methotrexate/gold; use inhaled cromolyn; use of oral, intranasal or parenteral steroids within 4 weeks of study start; significant concomitant illness; immunotherapy requiring change in dose within 12 weeks; concurrent use of prescription/over the counter medication that may affect course of asthma/interact with sympathomimetic amines. Use of loratadine/intranasal cromolyn for allergic rhinitis permitted if treatment started before screening visit and continued without change

Interventions

FP100BID (200mcg/d) versus FP100QD (200mcg/d) versus PLA. Inhaler device: Diskus. Study duration: 12 weeks, preceded by run‐in period ‐ placebo device for 2 weeks; prn SABA, SAL and XANTH continued (if SAL and XANTH used pre‐run‐in)

Outcomes

FEV1; am PEF; pm PEF; symptoms; rescue medication usage; nocturnal awakenings; withdrawals; adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Wolfe 2000 ICS

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes (not stated)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind, double dummy
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 4

Participants

358 adults and adolescents screened. 199 randomised; PLA: 69; FP100BID: 65; FP200QD: 65. Gender M/F (%): PLA: 58/42; FP100BID: 48/52; FP200QD: 60/40; Mean age: PLA: 36; FP100BID: 39; FP200QID: 36; FEV1 L: PLA: 2.35 (SEM 0.07); FP100BID: 2.26 (SEM 0.07); FP200QD: 2.38 (SEM 0.08); FEV1 (% predicted): PLA: 67.87 (SEM 1.17); FP100BID: 65.93 (SEM 1.19); FP200QD: 66.6 (SEM 1.02); am PEF (L/min): PLA: 408 (SEM 12); FP100BID: 396 (SEM 11); FP200QD: 421 (SEM 11); pm PEF (L/min): PLA: 426 (SEM 12); FP100BID: 411 (SEM 11); FP200QD: 438 (SEM 11); Symptoms: PLA: 2.62 (SEM 0.3); FP100BID: 2.91 (SEM 0.34); FP200QD: 2.82 (SEM 0.32); Nocturnal awakenings: 0.08 (SEM 0.02); FP100BID: 0.06 (SEM 0.01); FP200QD: 0.07 (SEM 0.02)

Inclusion criteria: ICS >/=8 puffs day of BDP (42mcg/puff) or TAA (100mcg/puff) for three months; asthma stability defined as 0 days with >/= 12 puffs of SABA prn; </=4 mornings when PEF decreased by >/= 20% from previous pm's PEF; </=2 nights with awakenings caused by asthma requiring inhaled SABA; FEV1 between 50 & 80% predicted & +/‐15% screening value; adequate compliance during run‐in.

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: pregnancy/lactation; use of methotrexate/gold; use inhaled cromolyn; use of oral, intranasal or parenteral steroids within 4 weeks of study start; significant concomitant illness; immunotherapy requiring change in dose within 12 weeks; concurrent use of prescription/over the counter medication that may affect course of asthma/interact with sympathomimetic amines. Use of loratadine/intranasal cromolyn for allergic rhinitis permitted if treatment started before screening visit and continued without change

Interventions

FP100BID versus FP200QD versus PLA. Inhaler device: Diskus. Run‐in period: 2 weeks (ICS dosage regimen maintained).

Outcomes

FEV1; am PEF; pm PEF; symptoms; rescue medication usage; nocturnal awakenings; withdrawals; adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

ZuWallack 2000

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes (method not reported)
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind, double dummy
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated (ITT)

Jadad score: 3

Participants

253 adults and adolescents randomsied; Gender: M:F (%): FP500: 51:49; FP1000: 59:41; PLA: 58:42; Age range: 12‐69; FEV1 (L)*: FP500: 2.44 (SEM: 0.07); FP1000: 2.51 (SEM 0.08); PLA: 2.46 (SEM 0.06); FEV1 (% predicted): FP500: 68 (SEM: 0.9); FP1000: 66 (SEM 1); PLA: 67 (SEM 1); am PEF (L/min)*: FP500: 410 (SEM 9); FP1000: 402 (SEM 10); PLA: 418 (SEM 11); pm PEF (L/min)*: FP500: 434 (SEM 10); FP1000: 429 (SEM 10); PLA: 441 (SEM 11); Asthma symptom scores*: FP500: 1.13 (SEM 0.05); FP1000: 1.06 (SEM 0.06); PLA: 1.08 (SEM 0.07); ß‐2 agonist use (puffs/d)*: FP500: 2.82 (SEM 0.24); FP1000 2.67 (SEM 0.27) ; PLA: 3.04 (SEM 0.28); Nighttime awakenings/night*: FP500: 0.08 (SEM 0.02); FP1000: 0.11 (SEM 0.02); PLA 0.15 (0.02)

*denotes efficacy population

Inclusion criteria: Chronic asthma (ATS diagnosis); requirement of daily pharmacotherapy over 6 mo prior to study; FEV1 50‐80% predicted; >/= 15% increase in FEV1 <15 minutes after 2 puffs of ß‐2 agonist OR documented >/=15% variation in FEV1 within 6 mo prior to study. Open label extension: Participants completing DB phase eligible

Exclusion criteria: History of life‐threatening asthma or other severe chronic disease; use of oral/intranasal/parenteral steroids; inhaled nedocromil or cromolyn sodium within 1 mo prior to start of study; ise of methotrexate/gold salts, any prescription/over the counter medication which could affect course of asthma; participation in previous study with Diskus device

Interventions

Inhaled FP 250mcg versus FP 500mcg versus placebo BID. Identical inhaler devices used (Diskus powder inhaler). Participants in FP500mcg given placebo inhaler for pm dose. Double‐blind phase duration: 12 weeks

Outcomes

Lung function (FEV1, PEF); Probability of remaining in study; Symptoms; Medication use; Safety; HPA axis function

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

ACTH: adrenocorticotropic hormone; ATS: American Thoracic Society; BAL: bronchoalveolar lavage; BDP: beclomethasone dipropionate; BID: twice daily; BHR: bronchial hyperresponsiveness; BUD: budesonide; DPI: dry powder inhaler; ECP: eosinophil cationic protein; EDN: eosinophil derived neurotoxinl; FEF25‐75: forced expiratory flow at 25 to 75% of FVC; FEV1: forced expired volume in one second; FP: fluticasone propionate; FVC: forced vital capacity; HPA: hypothalamo‐pituitary‐adrenal; ICAM‐1: intercellular adhesion molecule‐1; ICS: inhaled corticosteroid; ITT: intension‐to‐treat; mcg/d: micrograms per day; MDI: metered dose inhaler; PD15 FEV1: provocative dose of inhalant required to produce a 15% fall in FEV1; PC20 FEV1: provocative concentration of inhalant required to produce a 20% fall in FEV1; PD20 FEV1: provocative dose of inhalant required to produce a 20% fall in FEV1; PEFR: peak expiratory flow rate; TA: triamcinolone acetonide

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Acuna 2001

Randomised study of the acute effects of inhalation of FP in mild asthmatics

Baitinger 2002

Comparison with combination product

Bisgaard 1999

This study assessed a group of young children including infants under the age of two years

Chervinsky 2001

Comparison between FP and LTRA

Cirule 2002

No clear diagnosis of asthma

Dal Negro 2001

FP as additional treatment to SAL

de Benedictis 2001

Comparison between FP and BDP

Dente 2001

No PLA control

Efthimiou 1998

Nebuliser delivery device

Eliraz 2002

Comparison with combination product

Falcoz 2000a

Wrong comparison (FP versus FP via different inhalers)

Faul 2002

Comparison between FP and LTRA

Fletcher 1999

Nebuliser delivery device

Fowler 2002

Comparison between different propellants

Harrison 2001

Comparison between FP and BDP

Kanniess 2001

Comparison between FP and LTRA

Kelly 2001

Not randomised

Lee 2002

Comparison with TAA

Leibman 2002

Comparison between SAL and LTRA as add on to FP

Lipworth 1997

Crossover study with intervention periods of only 4 days

Lujik 2004

Study of inadequate duration

Majer‐Teboul 2001

Comparison with BDP

Moore 1998

Wrong outcomes assessed

Overbeek 2002

Compaison with LTRA

Pao 2002

Participants had wheeze and not asthma

Srebro 1998

Wrong comparison

Teper 1998

Study assesses infants

Wilson 1997

Placebo was not a randomised intervention

Wilson 1998a

Crossover design study with intervention periods of 4 days

Wilson 1998b

Placebo was not a randomised intervention

Wong 1997

Infant age group
Assessing the effects of fluticasone in infants discharged from hospital following recent acute bronchiolitis

FP: fluticasone; SAL: salmeterol; BUD: budesonide; F: formoterol; TAA: triamcinolone; LTRA: anti‐leukoptriene agent; PLA: placebo

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

9

1364

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.25, 0.34]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 Children

2

321

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.04, 0.20]

1.2 Adults

7

1043

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.32, 0.43]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

10

1673

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.18, 0.25]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

2.1 Children

2

321

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.05, 0.18]

2.2 Adults

8

1352

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.21, 0.31]

3 FEV1 ‐ Litres (absolute values) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 3 FEV1 ‐ Litres (absolute values).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 3 FEV1 ‐ Litres (absolute values).

3.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

10

1705

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

22.79 [19.07, 26.51]

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

4.1 Children

2

353

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

26.41 [18.03, 34.79]

4.2 Adults

8

1352

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

21.91 [17.76, 26.06]

5 Change in am PEF (predicted) Show forest plot

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in am PEF (predicted).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in am PEF (predicted).

5.1 Children

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

8

1794

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

11.46 [8.19, 14.74]

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

6.1 Children

2

780

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.98 [2.26, 11.71]

6.2 Adults

6

1014

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

15.60 [11.06, 20.15]

7 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

9

1954

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

12.08 [8.87, 15.30]

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

7.1 Children

2

780

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

6.98 [2.26, 11.70]

7.2 Adults

7

1174

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

16.51 [12.12, 20.91]

8 Change in evening PEF (predicted) Show forest plot

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in evening PEF (predicted).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in evening PEF (predicted).

8.1 Children

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Peak flow ‐ L/min (absolute values) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 9 Peak flow ‐ L/min (absolute values).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 9 Peak flow ‐ L/min (absolute values).

9.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

10.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

11.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second) Show forest plot

2

467

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.05, 0.34]

Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

12.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

2

467

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.05, 0.34]

13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

8

1238

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐0.69, ‐0.46]

Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

13.1 Children

2

353

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐0.73, ‐0.31]

13.2 Adults

6

885

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.73, ‐0.46]

14 Symptoms ‐ absolute scores Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 14 Symptoms ‐ absolute scores.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 14 Symptoms ‐ absolute scores.

14.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

895

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.25 [‐0.38, ‐0.12]

Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 15 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 15 Change in night‐time wakening score.

15.1 Children

1

176

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.29 [‐0.59, 0.01]

15.2 Adults

5

719

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.24 [‐0.39, ‐0.09]

16 Nighttime awakenings/night Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 16 Nighttime awakenings/night.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 16 Nighttime awakenings/night.

16.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

648

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.17, ‐0.05]

Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 17 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 17 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

17.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Adults

4

648

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.17, ‐0.05]

18 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

9

1839

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.94 [‐1.14, ‐0.74]

Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 18 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 18 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

18.1 Children

3

957

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.87, ‐0.33]

18.2 Adults

6

882

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.36 [‐1.66, ‐1.06]

19 Rescue medication usage ‐ puffs/d (absolute scores) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 19 Rescue medication usage ‐ puffs/d (absolute scores).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 19 Rescue medication usage ‐ puffs/d (absolute scores).

19.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 HRQOL: AQLQ Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 20 HRQOL: AQLQ.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 20 HRQOL: AQLQ.

20.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 21 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 21 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version).

21.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 22 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 22 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension.

22.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.23

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 23 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 23 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.

23.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, social dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.24

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 24 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, social dimension.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 24 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, social dimension.

24.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.25

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 25 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 25 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire.

25.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective Show forest plot

4

664

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.12 [3.76, 6.98]

Analysis 1.26

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 26 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 26 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.

26.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26.2 Adults

4

664

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.12 [3.76, 6.98]

27 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.27

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 27 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 27 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

27.1 Children

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

27.2 Adults

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

28 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

8

1479

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.20, 0.32]

Analysis 1.28

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 28 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 28 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

28.1 Children

2

353

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.21, 0.49]

28.2 Adults

6

1126

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.23 [0.17, 0.31]

29 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

3

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.38, 3.20]

Analysis 1.29

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 29 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 29 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

29.1 Children

1

604

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.33, 4.65]

29.2 Adults

2

353

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.15, 5.43]

30 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

2

197

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [‐1.05, 1.59]

Analysis 1.30

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 30 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 30 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).

30.1 Children

1

159

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [‐0.84, 2.24]

30.2 Adults

1

38

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.90 [‐3.46, 1.66]

31 Total urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.31

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 31 Total urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 31 Total urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours).

31.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

31.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

32 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

1336

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.98 [0.97, 4.04]

Analysis 1.32

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 32 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 32 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

32.1 Children

2

821

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.71 [0.73, 3.99]

32.2 Adults

4

515

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.82 [0.74, 10.75]

33 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1215

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.00 [1.53, 16.37]

Analysis 1.33

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 33 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 33 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

33.1 Children

2

395

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.19 [0.74, 69.93]

33.2 Adults

5

820

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.36 [1.09, 17.52]

34 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1298

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.45 [1.29, 9.26]

Analysis 1.34

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 34 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 34 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

34.1 Children

3

653

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.98 [0.40, 9.85]

34.2 Adults

4

645

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.84 [1.39, 16.88]

35 Headaches Show forest plot

3

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.58, 1.17]

Analysis 1.35

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 35 Headaches.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 35 Headaches.

35.1 Children

1

604

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.50, 1.10]

35.2 Adults

2

353

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.57, 2.59]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

10

1673

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.18, 0.25]

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 1‐5 months

10

1673

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.18, 0.25]

1.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

10

1705

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

22.79 [19.07, 26.51]

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

2.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 1‐5 months

10

1705

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

22.79 [19.07, 26.51]

2.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

9

1954

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

12.08 [8.87, 15.30]

Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

3.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 1‐5 months

9

1954

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

12.08 [8.87, 15.30]

3.3 6 months or greater

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

8

1238

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐0.69, ‐0.46]

Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

4.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 1‐5 months

8

1238

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐0.69, ‐0.46]

4.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

648

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.17, ‐0.05]

Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

5.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 1‐5 months

4

648

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.17, ‐0.05]

5.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

895

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.25 [‐0.38, ‐0.12]

Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 Change in night‐time wakening score.

6.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 1‐5 months

6

895

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.25 [‐0.38, ‐0.12]

6.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

9

1839

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.94 [‐1.14, ‐0.74]

Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 7 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 7 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

7.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 1‐5 months

9

1839

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.94 [‐1.14, ‐0.74]

7.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective Show forest plot

4

664

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.12 [3.76, 6.98]

Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 8 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 8 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.

8.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 1‐5 months

4

664

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.12 [3.76, 6.98]

8.3 6 months or greater

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

8

1479

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.20, 0.32]

Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

9.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 1‐5 months

8

1479

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.20, 0.32]

9.3 6 months or greater

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

1336

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.98 [0.97, 4.04]

Analysis 2.10

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 10 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 10 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

10.1 1‐4 weeks

1

38

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.38 [0.31, 18.63]

10.2 1‐5 months

4

1081

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.71 [0.73, 3.98]

10.3 6 months or greater

1

217

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.24 [0.55, 19.04]

11 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1215

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.00 [1.53, 16.37]

Analysis 2.11

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

11.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 1‐5 months

6

998

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.36 [1.09, 17.52]

11.3 6 months or greater

1

217

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.19 [0.74, 69.93]

12 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1298

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.45 [1.29, 9.26]

Analysis 2.12

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 12 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 12 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

12.1 1‐4 weeks

1

258

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.00, 6.93]

12.2 1‐5 months

5

823

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.77 [1.21, 11.79]

12.3 6 months or greater

1

217

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.19 [0.74, 69.93]

13 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

3

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.38, 3.20]

Analysis 2.13

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 13 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 13 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

13.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 1‐5 months

3

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.38, 3.20]

13.3 6 months or greater

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

10

1673

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.18, 0.25]

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 MDI

4

559

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.32, 0.48]

1.2 DPI

6

1114

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.16 [0.12, 0.21]

2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

10

1705

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

22.79 [19.07, 26.51]

Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

2.1 MDI

5

868

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

17.86 [12.36, 23.35]

2.2 DPI

5

837

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

26.98 [21.92, 32.04]

3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

9

1954

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

12.08 [8.87, 15.30]

Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

3.1 MDI

3

381

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

19.11 [12.08, 26.14]

3.2 DPI

6

1573

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

10.22 [6.61, 13.84]

4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

8

1238

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐0.69, ‐0.46]

Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

4.1 MDI

4

559

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐0.69, ‐0.35]

4.2 DPI

4

679

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.62 [‐0.78, ‐0.47]

5 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

648

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.17, ‐0.05]

Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

5.1 MDI

3

488

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.09 [‐0.16, ‐0.02]

5.2 DPI

1

160

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.31, ‐0.05]

6 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

895

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.25 [‐0.38, ‐0.12]

Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change in night‐time wakening score.

6.1 MDI

4

559

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.35, ‐0.02]

6.2 DPI

2

336

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.36 [‐0.58, ‐0.14]

7 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

9

1839

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.94 [‐1.14, ‐0.74]

Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 7 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 7 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

7.1 MDI

4

559

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.11 [‐1.48, ‐0.74]

7.2 DPI

5

1280

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.87 [‐1.11, ‐0.63]

8 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective Show forest plot

4

664

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.12 [3.76, 6.98]

Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 8 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 8 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.

8.1 MDI

2

336

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.15 [3.31, 8.02]

8.2 DPI

2

328

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.09 [3.30, 7.85]

9 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

8

1479

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.20, 0.32]

Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

9.1 MDI

4

801

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.23 [0.16, 0.33]

9.2 DPI

4

678

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.20, 0.38]

10 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

1336

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.98 [0.97, 4.04]

Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 10 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 10 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

10.1 MDI

2

187

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.02 [0.49, 18.64]

10.2 DPI

4

1149

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.83 [0.84, 3.98]

11 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1215

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.00 [1.53, 16.37]

Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

11.1 MDI

3

492

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.71 [0.74, 18.49]

11.2 DPI

4

723

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.15 [1.23, 41.51]

12 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1298

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.45 [1.29, 9.26]

Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 12 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 12 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

12.1 MDI

2

317

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.19 [0.54, 18.68]

12.2 DPI

5

981

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.58 [1.09, 11.75]

13 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

3

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.38, 3.20]

Analysis 3.13

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 13 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 13 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

13.1 MDI

2

353

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.15, 5.43]

13.2 DPI

1

604

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.33, 4.65]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 4. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

10

1673

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.18, 0.25]

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 Mild

1

309

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.06, 0.10]

1.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.19, 0.51]

1.3 Moderate

8

1206

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.22, 0.31]

2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

10

1705

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

22.79 [19.07, 26.51]

Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

2.1 Mild

1

309

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.60 [0.84, 16.36]

2.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

30.0 [17.98, 42.02]

2.3 Moderate

8

1238

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

26.61 [22.08, 31.14]

3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

9

1954

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

12.08 [8.87, 15.30]

Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

3.1 Mild

2

913

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

5.92 [1.52, 10.33]

3.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

30.00 [19.32, 40.68]

3.3 Moderate

6

883

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

16.51 [11.26, 21.76]

7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

8

1238

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐0.69, ‐0.46]

Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

7.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [‐0.85, ‐0.21]

7.3 Moderate

7

1080

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.58 [‐0.70, ‐0.46]

8 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

648

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.17, ‐0.05]

Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

8.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.25, 0.01]

8.3 Moderate

3

490

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.18, ‐0.04]

9 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

895

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.25 [‐0.38, ‐0.12]

Analysis 4.9

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.

9.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.29 [‐0.61, 0.02]

9.3 Moderate

5

737

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.24 [‐0.38, ‐0.09]

10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

9

1839

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.94 [‐1.14, ‐0.74]

Analysis 4.10

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

10.1 Mild

1

604

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐0.76, ‐0.04]

10.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.83 [‐1.38, ‐0.28]

10.3 Moderate

7

1077

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.26 [‐1.52, ‐0.99]

16 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective Show forest plot

4

664

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.12 [3.76, 6.98]

Analysis 4.16

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 16 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 16 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.

16.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.06 [2.65, 9.67]

16.3 Moderate

3

506

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.14 [3.61, 7.31]

18 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

8

1479

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.20, 0.32]

Analysis 4.18

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 18 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 18 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

18.1 Mild

1

313

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.53 [0.15, 379.73]

18.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.11, 0.38]

18.3 Moderate

6

1008

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.20, 0.34]

21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

1336

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.95 [0.93, 4.06]

Analysis 4.21

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

21.1 Mild

1

604

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.42 [0.53, 3.79]

21.2 Mild to moderate

2

255

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.31 [0.66, 16.51]

21.3 Moderate

3

477

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.41 [0.46, 12.65]

22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1215

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.50 [1.06, 11.52]

Analysis 4.22

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

22.1 Mild

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22.2 Mild to moderate

2

382

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.99 [0.58, 43.17]

22.3 Moderate

5

833

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.91 [0.69, 12.29]

23 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1298

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.81 [1.05, 7.48]

Analysis 4.23

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 23 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 23 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

23.1 Mild

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23.2 Mild to moderate

3

560

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.08 [0.61, 15.51]

23.3 Moderate

4

738

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.65 [0.77, 9.11]

24 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

3

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.38, 3.20]

Analysis 4.24

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 24 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 24 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

24.1 Mild

2

917

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.32, 3.11]

24.2 Mild to moderate

1

40

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.33 [0.09, 60.84]

24.3 Moderate

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 5. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

21

4790

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.21, 0.26]

Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 Children

2

331

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.12, 0.25]

1.2 Adults

19

4459

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.22, 0.27]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (imputed estimates) Show forest plot

22

4936

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.21, 0.26]

Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (imputed estimates).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (imputed estimates).

2.1 Children

3

477

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.13, 0.24]

2.2 Adults

19

4459

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.22, 0.28]

3 Change in FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

5

674

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.95 [7.98, 11.91]

Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).

3.1 Children

2

192

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

11.28 [7.62, 14.94]

3.2 Adults

3

482

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.41 [7.07, 11.74]

4 Change in FEV1 (%) Show forest plot

2

280

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

13.05 [7.85, 18.25]

Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FEV1 (%).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FEV1 (%).

4.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

2

280

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

13.05 [7.85, 18.25]

5 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute values) Show forest plot

4

157

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

4.22 [0.94, 7.50]

Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute values).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute values).

5.1 Children

3

125

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

5.92 [2.22, 9.62]

5.2 Adults

1

32

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.0 [‐9.08, 5.08]

6 FEV1 (absolute values) Show forest plot

2

86

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [‐0.00, 0.13]

Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 FEV1 (absolute values).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 FEV1 (absolute values).

6.1 Children

1

68

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [‐0.00, 0.12]

6.2 Adults

1

18

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.59 [‐0.31, 1.49]

7 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline Show forest plot

24

5117

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

26.96 [24.51, 29.40]

Analysis 5.7

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

7.1 Children

5

611

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

25.68 [20.09, 31.27]

7.2 Adults

19

4506

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

27.26 [24.54, 29.98]

8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

21

3752

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

29.29 [26.44, 32.14]

Analysis 5.8

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

8.1 Children

3

509

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

27.50 [20.79, 34.21]

8.2 Adults

18

3243

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

29.69 [26.54, 32.83]

9 Mean change in am PEF (% predicted) Show forest plot

2

665

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [2.92, 6.05]

Analysis 5.9

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Mean change in am PEF (% predicted).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Mean change in am PEF (% predicted).

9.1 Children

1

241

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

6.0 [2.08, 9.92]

9.2 Adults

1

424

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

4.2 [2.49, 5.91]

10 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

15

3118

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

21.33 [18.26, 24.40]

Analysis 5.10

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

10.1 Children

2

331

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

20.77 [13.06, 28.47]

10.2 Adults

13

2787

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

21.44 [18.09, 24.79]

11 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

16

3283

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

21.59 [18.55, 24.62]

Analysis 5.11

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

11.1 Children

2

331

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

20.77 [13.07, 28.46]

11.2 Adults

14

2952

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

21.74 [18.44, 25.03]

12 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.12

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

12.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Peak flow L/min (absolute values) Show forest plot

2

50

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

68.07 [7.89, 128.25]

Analysis 5.13

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Peak flow L/min (absolute values).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Peak flow L/min (absolute values).

13.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

2

50

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

68.07 [7.89, 128.25]

14 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.14

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

14.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second) Show forest plot

2

1423

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.16, 0.34]

Analysis 5.15

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

15.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

2

1423

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.16, 0.34]

16 Histamine BHR (log base 2 PC20 FEV1 mg/ml) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.16

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Histamine BHR (log base 2 PC20 FEV1 mg/ml).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Histamine BHR (log base 2 PC20 FEV1 mg/ml).

16.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

20

3671

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.49 [‐0.56, ‐0.43]

Analysis 5.17

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

17.1 Children

3

509

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.55 [‐0.72, ‐0.37]

17.2 Adults

17

3162

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.48 [‐0.56, ‐0.41]

18 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

884

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.59, ‐0.32]

Analysis 5.18

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Change in night‐time wakening score.

18.1 Children

1

173

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.41 [‐0.71, ‐0.11]

18.2 Adults

5

711

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.47 [‐0.62, ‐0.32]

19 Change in symptom free days Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.19

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Change in symptom free days.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Change in symptom free days.

19.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%) Show forest plot

3

971

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.03 [3.31, 10.75]

Analysis 5.20

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).

20.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 Adults

3

971

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.03 [3.31, 10.75]

21 Percentage nights without awakening ‐ change from baseline Show forest plot

2

208

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.65 [4.84, 16.46]

Analysis 5.21

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 Percentage nights without awakening ‐ change from baseline.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 Percentage nights without awakening ‐ change from baseline.

21.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21.2 Adults

2

208

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.65 [4.84, 16.46]

22 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

641

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.23, ‐0.12]

Analysis 5.22

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

22.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22.2 Adults

4

641

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.23, ‐0.12]

23 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night Show forest plot

5

1359

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.17, ‐0.08]

Analysis 5.23

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.

23.1 Children

1

158

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.1 [‐0.16, ‐0.04]

23.2 Adults

4

1201

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.24, ‐0.09]

24 Change in nocturnal awakenings (unspecified time) Show forest plot

2

280

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.11, ‐0.02]

Analysis 5.24

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 Change in nocturnal awakenings (unspecified time).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 Change in nocturnal awakenings (unspecified time).

24.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24.2 Adults

2

280

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.11, ‐0.02]

25 Symptoms (absolute values) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.25

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 Symptoms (absolute values).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 Symptoms (absolute values).

25.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

20

4899

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.20 [‐1.34, ‐1.05]

Analysis 5.26

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

26.1 Children

3

509

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.04 [‐1.39, ‐0.70]

26.2 Adults

17

4390

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.23 [‐1.39, ‐1.07]

27 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d ‐ imputed estimates) Show forest plot

22

5111

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.01 [‐1.13, ‐0.88]

Analysis 5.27

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 27 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d ‐ imputed estimates).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 27 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d ‐ imputed estimates).

27.1 Children

3

509

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.04 [‐1.39, ‐0.70]

27.2 Adults

19

4602

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.00 [‐1.13, ‐0.87]

28 Change from baseline in rescue medication free days (%) Show forest plot

2

809

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.49 [5.48, 15.51]

Analysis 5.28

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 28 Change from baseline in rescue medication free days (%).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 28 Change from baseline in rescue medication free days (%).

28.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

28.2 Adults

2

809

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.49 [5.48, 15.51]

29 Rescue medication (absolute scores) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.29

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 29 Rescue medication (absolute scores).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 29 Rescue medication (absolute scores).

29.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

29.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

30 HRQOL: AQLQ (absolute socres) Show forest plot

3

513

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.49, 0.87]

Analysis 5.30

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 30 HRQOL: AQLQ (absolute socres).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 30 HRQOL: AQLQ (absolute socres).

30.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

30.2 Adults

3

513

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.49, 0.87]

31 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.31

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 31 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 31 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version).

31.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

31.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

32 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.32

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 32 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 32 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension.

32.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

32.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

33 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.33

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 33 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 33 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.

33.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

33.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

34 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, social dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.34

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 34 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, social dimension.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 34 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, social dimension.

34.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

34.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

35 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.35

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 35 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 35 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire.

35.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

35.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

36 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

568

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [4.16, 8.16]

Analysis 5.36

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 36 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 36 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

36.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

36.2 Adults

3

568

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [4.16, 8.16]

37 Exacerbations requiring OCS treatment Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.37

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 37 Exacerbations requiring OCS treatment.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 37 Exacerbations requiring OCS treatment.

37.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

37.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

38 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

702

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.12, 0.39]

Analysis 5.38

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 38 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 38 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

38.1 Children

2

248

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.09, 0.38]

38.2 Adults

2

454

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.11, 0.79]

39 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

4071

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.17, 0.24]

Analysis 5.39

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 39 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 39 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

39.1 Children

2

351

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.13, 0.31]

39.2 Adults

15

3720

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.17, 0.25]

40 Withdrawals (any reason) Show forest plot

8

2080

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.31, 0.51]

Analysis 5.40

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 40 Withdrawals (any reason).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 40 Withdrawals (any reason).

40.1 Children

1

158

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.18, 0.61]

40.2 Adults

7

1922

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.42 [0.32, 0.54]

41 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

13

3595

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.31 [0.76, 2.27]

Analysis 5.41

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 41 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 41 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

41.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

41.2 Adults

13

3595

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.31 [0.76, 2.27]

42 Adverse events (any) Show forest plot

4

884

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.84, 1.52]

Analysis 5.42

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 42 Adverse events (any).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 42 Adverse events (any).

42.1 Children

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

42.2 Adults

4

884

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.84, 1.52]

43 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

13

1887

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.55 [1.43, 4.56]

Analysis 5.43

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 43 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 43 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

43.1 Children

3

395

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.54, 3.57]

43.2 Adults

10

1492

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.68 [1.76, 7.67]

44 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

3480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.82 [1.27, 2.60]

Analysis 5.44

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 44 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 44 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

44.1 Children

2

372

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.54, 3.54]

44.2 Adults

15

3108

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [1.29, 2.80]

45 Headaches Show forest plot

10

2602

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.83, 1.38]

Analysis 5.45

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 45 Headaches.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 45 Headaches.

45.1 Children

1

158

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.39 [0.43, 4.50]

45.2 Adults

9

2444

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.81, 1.37]

46 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

10

1645

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.34 [2.83, 14.21]

Analysis 5.46

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 46 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 46 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

46.1 Children

2

394

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.10 [0.83, 79.01]

46.2 Adults

8

1251

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.12 [2.58, 14.51]

47 Upper respiratory tract infection Show forest plot

3

1623

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.76, 1.49]

Analysis 5.47

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 47 Upper respiratory tract infection.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 47 Upper respiratory tract infection.

47.1 Children

1

158

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.41, 2.31]

47.2 Adults

2

1465

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.75, 1.55]

48 Sinusitis Show forest plot

5

2030

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.29 [0.84, 1.99]

Analysis 5.48

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 48 Sinusitis.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 48 Sinusitis.

48.1 Children

1

158

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.69 [0.60, 4.74]

48.2 Adults

4

1872

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.76, 1.96]

49 Total urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.49

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 49 Total urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 49 Total urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours).

49.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

49.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

50 AUC serum cortisol (ng*h/mL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.50

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 50 AUC serum cortisol (ng*h/mL).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 50 AUC serum cortisol (ng*h/mL).

50.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

50.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

51 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

2

194

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.00 [‐1.33, 1.33]

Analysis 5.51

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 51 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 51 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).

51.1 Children

1

154

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [‐1.23, 1.83]

51.2 Adults

1

40

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.90 [‐3.57, 1.77]

52 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.52

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 52 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 52 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).

52.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

52.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

53 Change in peak plasma cortisol expression (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

2

117

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐2.56, 1.36]

Analysis 5.53

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 53 Change in peak plasma cortisol expression (mcg/dL).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 53 Change in peak plasma cortisol expression (mcg/dL).

53.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

53.2 Adults

2

117

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐2.56, 1.36]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 6. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

22

4936

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.21, 0.26]

Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 1‐4 weeks

1

46

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.05, 0.49]

1.2 1‐5 months

20

3627

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.24, 0.29]

1.3 6 months or longer

1

1263

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.1 [0.04, 0.16]

2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

5

674

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.95 [7.98, 11.91]

Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).

2.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 1‐5 months

5

674

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.95 [7.98, 11.91]

2.3 6 months or longer

0

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline Show forest plot

24

5117

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

26.96 [24.51, 29.40]

Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

3.1 1‐4 weeks

1

46

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

11.0 [‐9.83, 31.83]

3.2 1‐5 months

22

3808

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

29.03 [26.27, 31.80]

3.3 6 months or longer

1

1263

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

20.1 [14.70, 25.50]

4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

16

3283

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

21.59 [18.55, 24.62]

Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

4.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 1‐5 months

16

3283

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

21.59 [18.55, 24.62]

4.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

22

5111

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.01 [‐1.13, ‐0.88]

Analysis 6.5

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

5.1 1‐4 weeks

1

46

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.90 [‐1.73, ‐0.07]

5.2 1‐5 months

20

3802

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.25 [‐1.39, ‐1.11]

5.3 6 months or longer

1

1263

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.44, 0.08]

6 HRQOL: AQLQ Show forest plot

3

513

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.49, 0.87]

Analysis 6.6

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 HRQOL: AQLQ.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 HRQOL: AQLQ.

6.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 1‐5 months

3

513

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.49, 0.87]

6.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

20

3671

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.49 [‐0.56, ‐0.43]

Analysis 6.7

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

7.1 1‐4 weeks

1

46

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [‐0.37, 0.78]

7.2 1‐5 months

19

3625

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.50 [‐0.57, ‐0.44]

7.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%) Show forest plot

3

971

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.03 [3.31, 10.75]

Analysis 6.8

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 8 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 8 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).

8.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 1‐5 months

3

971

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.03 [3.31, 10.75]

8.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

884

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.59, ‐0.32]

Analysis 6.9

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.

9.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 1‐5 months

6

884

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.59, ‐0.32]

9.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night Show forest plot

5

1359

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.17, ‐0.08]

Analysis 6.10

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 10 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 10 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.

10.1 1‐4 weeks

1

158

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.1 [‐0.16, ‐0.04]

10.2 1‐5 months

4

1201

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.24, ‐0.09]

10.3 6 months or more

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

641

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.23, ‐0.12]

Analysis 6.11

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

11.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 1‐5 months

4

641

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.23, ‐0.12]

11.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

568

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [4.16, 8.16]

Analysis 6.12

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

12.3 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.4 1‐5 months

3

568

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [4.16, 8.16]

12.5 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

702

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.12, 0.39]

Analysis 6.13

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

13.1 1‐4 weeks

1

46

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.00, 6.82]

13.2 1‐5 months

2

442

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.10, 0.66]

13.3 6 months or longer

1

214

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.09, 0.42]

14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

4071

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.17, 0.24]

Analysis 6.14

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

14.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 1‐5 months

15

2667

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.17, 0.24]

14.3 6 months or longer

2

1404

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.08, 1.00]

15 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

13

3595

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.31 [0.76, 2.27]

Analysis 6.15

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 15 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 15 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

15.1 1‐4 weeks

4

203

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.20 [0.74, 69.96]

15.2 1‐5 months

7

1988

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.56, 2.27]

15.3 6 months or longer

2

1404

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [0.50, 3.33]

16 Withdrawals (any reason) Show forest plot

8

2080

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.31, 0.51]

Analysis 6.16

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 16 Withdrawals (any reason).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 16 Withdrawals (any reason).

16.1 1‐4 weeks

2

117

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.78 [0.63, 22.68]

16.2 1‐5 months

5

664

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.21, 0.40]

16.3 6 months or longer

1

1299

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.41, 0.90]

17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

3480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.82 [1.27, 2.60]

Analysis 6.17

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

17.1 1‐4 weeks

4

203

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.24, 4.10]

17.2 1‐5 months

10

1669

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.88 [1.15, 3.08]

17.3 6 months or longer

3

1608

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [1.09, 3.35]

18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

10

1645

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.34 [2.83, 14.21]

Analysis 6.18

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

18.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 1‐5 months

8

1322

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.25 [2.69, 14.52]

18.3 6 months or longer

2

323

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.39 [0.46, 119.72]

19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

13

1887

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.55 [1.43, 4.56]

Analysis 6.19

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

19.1 1‐4 weeks

1

60

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.92 [0.16, 399.84]

19.2 1‐5 months

10

1504

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.36 [1.30, 4.31]

19.3 6 months or longer

2

323

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.25 [0.45, 116.00]

20 Headaches Show forest plot

10

2602

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.83, 1.38]

Analysis 6.20

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 20 Headaches.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 20 Headaches.

20.1 1‐4 weeks

3

157

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.73 [0.90, 50.54]

20.2 1‐5 months

6

1160

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.75, 1.62]

20.3 6 months or longer

1

1285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.70, 1.41]

21 Sinusitis Show forest plot

5

2030

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.29 [0.84, 1.99]

Analysis 6.21

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 21 Sinusitis.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 21 Sinusitis.

21.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21.2 1‐5 months

4

745

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.64 [0.95, 2.85]

21.3 6 months or longer

1

1285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.44, 1.77]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 7. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

22

4936

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.21, 0.26]

Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 MDI

9

1337

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.33, 0.43]

1.2 DPI

13

3599

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.16, 0.22]

2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

5

674

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.95 [7.98, 11.91]

Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).

2.1 MDI

1

202

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

10.5 [7.19, 13.81]

2.2 DPI

4

472

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.65 [7.20, 12.09]

3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline Show forest plot

24

5117

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

26.96 [24.51, 29.40]

Analysis 7.3

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

3.1 MDI

10

1452

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

29.45 [24.97, 33.93]

3.2 DPI

14

3665

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

25.90 [22.98, 28.82]

4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

16

3283

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

21.59 [18.55, 24.62]

Analysis 7.4

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

4.1 MDI

5

787

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

27.98 [22.34, 33.62]

4.2 DPI

11

2496

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

18.99 [15.40, 22.59]

5 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

20

3671

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.49 [‐0.56, ‐0.43]

Analysis 7.5

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

5.1 MDI

7

1004

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.44 [‐0.57, ‐0.32]

5.2 DPI

12

2635

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.51 [‐0.59, ‐0.43]

5.3 Unclear

1

32

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%) Show forest plot

3

971

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.03 [3.31, 10.75]

Analysis 7.6

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).

6.4 MDI

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.5 DPI

3

971

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.03 [3.31, 10.75]

7 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night Show forest plot

5

1359

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.17, ‐0.08]

Analysis 7.7

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 7 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 7 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.

7.1 MDI

1

227

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.30, 0.00]

7.2 DPI

4

1132

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.17, ‐0.07]

8 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

641

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.23, ‐0.12]

Analysis 7.8

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 8 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 8 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

8.1 MDI

3

485

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.21, ‐0.09]

8.2 DPI

1

156

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.24 [‐0.34, ‐0.14]

9 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

884

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.59, ‐0.32]

Analysis 7.9

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.

9.1 MDI

4

555

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.39 [‐0.56, ‐0.22]

9.2 DPI

2

329

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.56 [‐0.78, ‐0.34]

10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

22

5111

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.01 [‐1.13, ‐0.88]

Analysis 7.10

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

10.1 MDI

8

1184

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.35 [‐1.60, ‐1.10]

10.2 DPI

14

3927

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.90 [‐1.04, ‐0.76]

11 HRQOL: AQLQ Show forest plot

3

513

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.49, 0.87]

Analysis 7.11

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 HRQOL: AQLQ.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 HRQOL: AQLQ.

11.4 MDI

3

513

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.49, 0.87]

11.5 DPI

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

568

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [4.16, 8.16]

Analysis 7.12

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

12.1 MDI

3

568

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [4.16, 8.16]

12.2 DPI

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

702

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.12, 0.39]

Analysis 7.13

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

13.1 MDI

1

46

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.00, 6.82]

13.2 DPI

3

656

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.12, 0.40]

14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

4071

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.17, 0.24]

Analysis 7.14

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

14.1 MDI

7

1105

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.14, 0.24]

14.2 DPI

10

2966

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.17, 0.28]

15 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

13

3595

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.31 [0.76, 2.27]

Analysis 7.15

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 15 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 15 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

15.1 MDI

6

778

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.35 [0.43, 4.21]

15.2 DPI

7

2817

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [0.70, 2.42]

16 Withdrawals (any reason) Show forest plot

8

2080

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.31, 0.51]

Analysis 7.16

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 16 Withdrawals (any reason).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 16 Withdrawals (any reason).

16.1 MDI

2

226

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.12, 0.37]

16.2 DPI

6

1854

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.35, 0.61]

17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

3480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.82 [1.27, 2.60]

Analysis 7.17

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

17.1 MDI

8

1085

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.21 [1.26, 3.89]

17.2 DPI

9

2395

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.60 [1.01, 2.53]

18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

10

1645

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.34 [2.83, 14.21]

Analysis 7.18

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

18.1 MDI

5

757

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.74 [2.13, 15.45]

18.2 DPI

5

888

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.72 [1.92, 31.07]

19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

13

1887

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.55 [1.43, 4.56]

Analysis 7.19

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

19.1 MDI

6

834

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.26 [1.17, 9.06]

19.2 DPI

7

1053

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.27 [1.12, 4.59]

20 Headaches Show forest plot

10

2602

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.83, 1.38]

Analysis 7.20

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 20 Headaches.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 20 Headaches.

20.1 MDI

4

446

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.61, 1.87]

20.2 DPI

6

2156

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.80, 1.43]

21 Sinusitis Show forest plot

5

2030

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.29 [0.84, 1.99]

Analysis 7.21

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 21 Sinusitis.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 21 Sinusitis.

21.1 MDI

3

587

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.63 [0.85, 3.11]

21.2 DPI

2

1443

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.61, 1.92]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 8. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

22

4936

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.21, 0.26]

Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 Mild

1

1263

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.1 [0.04, 0.16]

1.2 Mild to moderate

8

1320

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.22, 0.31]

1.3 Moderate

13

2353

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.23, 0.30]

2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

5

674

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.95 [7.98, 11.91]

Analysis 8.2

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).

2.1 Mild

0

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Mild to moderate

2

304

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

10.08 [6.69, 13.48]

2.3 Moderate

3

370

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.88 [7.47, 12.29]

3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline Show forest plot

24

5117

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

26.96 [24.51, 29.40]

Analysis 8.3

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

3.1 Mild

2

1331

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

19.35 [14.47, 24.24]

3.2 Mild to moderate

6

1094

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

24.48 [19.32, 29.64]

3.3 Moderate

16

2692

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

31.64 [28.27, 35.01]

4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

16

3283

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

21.59 [18.55, 24.62]

Analysis 8.4

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

4.1 Mild

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Mild to moderate

5

1305

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

18.22 [13.35, 23.09]

4.3 Moderate

11

1978

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

23.72 [19.84, 27.59]

5 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

20

3671

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.49 [‐0.56, ‐0.43]

Analysis 8.5

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 5 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 5 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

5.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Mild to moderate

7

1518

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐0.53, ‐0.33]

5.3 Moderate

13

2153

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.54 [‐0.63, ‐0.45]

6 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%) Show forest plot

3

971

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.03 [3.31, 10.75]

Analysis 8.6

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 6 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 6 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).

6.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Mild to moderate

1

408

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.0 [‐1.02, 9.02]

6.3 Moderate

2

563

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.72 [5.18, 16.27]

7 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

641

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.23, ‐0.12]

Analysis 8.7

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

7.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Mild to moderate

1

160

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.27, ‐0.07]

7.3 Moderate

3

481

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.24, ‐0.11]

8 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night Show forest plot

5

1359

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.17, ‐0.08]

Analysis 8.8

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.

8.1 MDI

1

227

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.30, 0.00]

8.2 DPI

4

1132

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.17, ‐0.07]

9 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

884

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.59, ‐0.32]

Analysis 8.9

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.

9.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Mild to moderate

1

160

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [‐0.84, ‐0.21]

9.3 Moderate

5

724

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.44 [‐0.59, ‐0.29]

10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

22

5111

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.01 [‐1.13, ‐0.88]

Analysis 8.10

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

10.1 Mild

1

1263

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.44, 0.08]

10.2 Mild to moderate

7

1518

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.89 [‐1.10, ‐0.68]

10.3 Moderate

14

2330

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.50 [‐1.68, ‐1.31]

11 HRQOL: AQLQ Show forest plot

3

513

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.49, 0.87]

Analysis 8.11

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 11 HRQOL: AQLQ.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 11 HRQOL: AQLQ.

11.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Mild to moderate

1

168

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.17, 0.81]

11.3 Moderate

1

175

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.48, 1.18]

11.4 Unclear

1

170

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.43, 1.07]

12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

568

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [4.16, 8.16]

Analysis 8.12

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

12.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Mild to moderate

1

168

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.01 [5.46, 18.37]

12.3 Moderate

2

400

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.58 [3.05, 6.86]

13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

702

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.12, 0.39]

Analysis 8.13

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

13.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Mild to moderate

3

668

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.12, 0.42]

13.3 Moderate

1

34

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.02, 1.11]

14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

4071

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.17, 0.24]

Analysis 8.14

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

14.1 Mild

2

1404

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.08, 1.00]

14.2 Mild to moderate

4

906

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.14, 0.30]

14.3 Moderate

11

1761

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.17, 0.25]

15 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

13

3595

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.31 [0.76, 2.27]

Analysis 8.15

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 15 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 15 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

15.1 Mild

3

1444

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.40 [0.56, 3.51]

15.2 Mild to moderate

6

1171

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.34 [0.50, 3.58]

15.3 Moderate

4

980

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.48, 3.07]

16 Withdrawals (any reason) Show forest plot

8

2080

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.31, 0.51]

Analysis 8.16

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 16 Withdrawals (any reason).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 16 Withdrawals (any reason).

16.1 Mild

1

1299

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.41, 0.90]

16.2 Mild to moderate

5

467

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.25, 0.60]

16.3 Moderate

2

314

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.16, 0.39]

17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

3480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.82 [1.27, 2.60]

Analysis 8.17

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

17.1 Mild

2

1394

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.97 [1.11, 3.49]

17.2 Mild to moderate

7

751

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.75, 2.53]

17.3 Moderate

8

1335

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.32 [1.16, 4.64]

18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

10

1645

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.34 [2.83, 14.21]

Analysis 8.18

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

18.1 Mild

1

109

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.39 [0.46, 119.72]

18.2 Mild to moderate

2

382

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.22 [0.14, 363.83]

18.3 Moderate

7

1154

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.21 [2.62, 14.72]

19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

13

1887

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.55 [1.43, 4.56]

Analysis 8.19

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

19.1 Mild

1

109

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.26 [0.14, 365.74]

19.2 Mild to moderate

4

600

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.65 [0.67, 4.06]

19.3 Moderate

7

1155

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.39 [1.56, 7.36]

19.4 Unclear

1

23

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 Headaches Show forest plot

10

2602

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.83, 1.38]

Analysis 8.20

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 20 Headaches.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 20 Headaches.

20.1 Mild

1

1285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.70, 1.41]

20.2 Mild to moderate

7

965

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.73, 1.72]

20.3 Moderate

2

352

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.39 [0.61, 3.19]

21 Sinusitis Show forest plot

5

2030

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.29 [0.84, 1.99]

Analysis 8.21

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 21 Sinusitis.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 21 Sinusitis.

21.1 Mild

1

1285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.44, 1.77]

21.2 Mild to moderate

2

338

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.36 [0.61, 3.03]

21.3 Moderate

2

407

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.94 [0.91, 4.14]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 9. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

6

872

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.39, 0.50]

Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

6

872

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.39, 0.50]

2 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute scores) Show forest plot

2

50

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

24.43 [15.90, 32.95]

Analysis 9.2

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute scores).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute scores).

2.1 Children

1

26

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.30 [‐25.66, 34.26]

2.2 Adults

1

24

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

26.20 [17.31, 35.09]

3 Change in morning PEF Show forest plot

8

1116

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

40.44 [35.43, 45.45]

Analysis 9.3

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEF.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEF.

3.1 Children

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

8

1116

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

40.44 [35.43, 45.45]

4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

7

1076

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

40.12 [35.06, 45.17]

Analysis 9.4

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

4.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

7

1076

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

40.12 [35.06, 45.17]

5 Change in am PEF (% predicted) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 9.5

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in am PEF (% predicted).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in am PEF (% predicted).

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline Show forest plot

4

515

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

30.20 [22.52, 37.87]

Analysis 9.6

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline.

6.1 Children

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

4

515

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

30.20 [22.52, 37.87]

7 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

3

354

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.96 [20.86, 37.06]

Analysis 9.7

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).

7.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

3

354

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.96 [20.86, 37.06]

8 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

Analysis 9.8

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

8.1 Children

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

9 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 9.9

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

9.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Change in number of night‐time awakenings per night Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 9.10

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in number of night‐time awakenings per night.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in number of night‐time awakenings per night.

10.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Change in % nights with no awakenings Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 9.11

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in % nights with no awakenings.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in % nights with no awakenings.

11.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

Analysis 9.12

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in night‐time wakening score.

12.1 Children

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

13 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

Analysis 9.13

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

13.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

14 Change in percentage of symptom free days compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

361

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

21.32 [13.54, 29.09]

Analysis 9.14

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in percentage of symptom free days compared to baseline.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in percentage of symptom free days compared to baseline.

14.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

2

361

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

21.32 [13.54, 29.09]

15 Change in percentage of rescue beta2 agonist free days compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 9.15

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Change in percentage of rescue beta2 agonist free days compared to baseline.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Change in percentage of rescue beta2 agonist free days compared to baseline.

15.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 HRQOL: AQLQ Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 9.16

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 HRQOL: AQLQ.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 HRQOL: AQLQ.

16.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.86 [4.09, 8.39]

Analysis 9.17

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

17.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Adults

3

480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.86 [4.09, 8.39]

18 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

191

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.17, 0.98]

Analysis 9.18

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

18.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Adults

2

191

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.17, 0.98]

19 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

847

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.10, 0.18]

Analysis 9.19

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

19.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

5

847

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.10, 0.18]

20 Withdrawals (total) Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 9.20

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Withdrawals (total).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Withdrawals (total).

20.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

Analysis 9.21

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

21.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21.2 Adults

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.36 [2.65, 20.46]

Analysis 9.22

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

22.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22.2 Adults

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.36 [2.65, 20.46]

23 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.37 [2.62, 15.48]

Analysis 9.23

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

23.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23.2 Adults

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.37 [2.62, 15.48]

25 No. patients with </=18 mcg/dL poststimulation cortisol Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 9.25

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 No. patients with </=18 mcg/dL poststimulation cortisol.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 No. patients with </=18 mcg/dL poststimulation cortisol.

25.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26 Plasma cortisol (AUC) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 9.26

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Plasma cortisol (AUC).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Plasma cortisol (AUC).

26.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 10. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

6

872

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.39, 0.50]

Analysis 10.1

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 1‐5 months

6

872

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.39, 0.50]

1.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

8

1116

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

40.44 [35.43, 45.45]

Analysis 10.2

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline.

2.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 1‐5 months

8

1116

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

40.44 [35.43, 45.45]

2.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

3

354

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.96 [20.86, 37.06]

Analysis 10.3

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).

3.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 1‐5 months

3

354

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.96 [20.86, 37.06]

3.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

Analysis 10.4

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

4.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 1‐5 months

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

4.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

Analysis 10.5

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in night‐time wakening score.

5.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 1‐5 months

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

5.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

Analysis 10.6

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

6.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 1‐5 months

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

6.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.86 [4.09, 8.39]

Analysis 10.9

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

9.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 1‐5 months

3

480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.86 [4.09, 8.39]

9.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

676

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.09, 0.17]

Analysis 10.11

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

11.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 1‐5 months

4

676

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.09, 0.17]

11.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

Analysis 10.12

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 12 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 12 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

12.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 1‐5 months

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

12.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.36 [2.65, 20.46]

Analysis 10.13

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 13 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 13 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

13.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 1‐5 months

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.36 [2.65, 20.46]

13.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.37 [2.62, 15.48]

Analysis 10.14

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 14 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 14 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

14.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 1‐5 months

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.37 [2.62, 15.48]

14.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 11. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

6

872

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.39, 0.50]

Analysis 11.1

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 MDI

1

26

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.29, 0.63]

1.2 DPI

5

846

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.38, 0.50]

2 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline Show forest plot

8

1116

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

40.44 [35.43, 45.45]

Analysis 11.2

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

2.1 MDI

2

230

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

34.84 [23.10, 46.58]

2.2 DPI

6

886

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

41.69 [36.15, 47.23]

3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

3

354

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.96 [20.86, 37.06]

Analysis 11.3

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).

3.1 MDI

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.3 [‐12.40, 29.00]

3.2 1DPI

2

331

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

32.69 [23.90, 41.49]

4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

Analysis 11.4

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

4.1 MDI

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 DPI

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

5 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

Analysis 11.5

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in night‐time wakening score.

5.1 MDI

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 DPI

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

Analysis 11.6

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

6.1 MDI

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 DPI

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

9 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.86 [4.09, 8.39]

Analysis 11.9

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

9.1 MDI

1

147

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.23 [2.74, 10.00]

9.2 DPI

2

333

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.16 [4.00, 9.49]

10 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

676

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.09, 0.17]

Analysis 11.10

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 10 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 10 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

10.1 MDI

1

147

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.06, 0.21]

10.2 DPI

3

529

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.09, 0.18]

11 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

Analysis 11.11

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

11.1 MDI

1

147

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 DPI

3

523

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

12 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.36 [2.65, 20.46]

Analysis 11.12

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 12 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 12 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

12.1 MDI

1

147

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.93 [0.81, 77.43]

12.2 DPI

3

523

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.23 [2.30, 22.68]

13 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.37 [2.62, 15.48]

Analysis 11.13

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 13 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 13 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

13.1 MDI

1

147

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.93 [0.81, 77.43]

13.2 DPI

4

694

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.12 [2.33, 16.07]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 12. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

6

872

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.39, 0.50]

Analysis 12.1

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 Mild

1

26

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.29, 0.63]

1.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 Moderate

5

846

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.38, 0.50]

2 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline Show forest plot

8

1116

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

40.44 [35.43, 45.45]

Analysis 12.2

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

2.1 Mild

2

63

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

32.91 [12.00, 53.81]

2.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 Moderate

6

1053

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

40.90 [35.74, 46.06]

3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

3

354

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.96 [20.86, 37.06]

Analysis 12.3

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).

3.1 Mild

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.3 [‐12.40, 29.00]

3.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.3 Moderate

2

331

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

32.69 [23.90, 41.49]

4 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

Analysis 12.4

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 4 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 4 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

4.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 Moderate

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

5 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

Analysis 12.5

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 5 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 5 Change in night‐time wakening score.

5.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.3 Moderate

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

Analysis 12.6

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

6.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.3 Moderate

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

7 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.86 [4.09, 8.39]

Analysis 12.7

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

7.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.3 Moderate

3

480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.86 [4.09, 8.39]

8 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

506

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.09, 0.18]

Analysis 12.8

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

8.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.3 Moderate

3

506

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.09, 0.18]

9 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

Analysis 12.9

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

9.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.3 Moderate

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

10 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.36 [2.65, 20.46]

Analysis 12.10

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 10 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 10 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

10.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.3 Moderate

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.36 [2.65, 20.46]

11 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.37 [2.62, 15.48]

Analysis 12.11

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 11 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 11 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

11.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.3 Moderate

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.37 [2.62, 15.48]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 13. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (litres) Show forest plot

3

73

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.22, 0.48]

Analysis 13.1

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).

1.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

3

73

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.22, 0.48]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

3

414

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.43, 0.63]

Analysis 13.2

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

2.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

3

414

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.43, 0.63]

3 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 13.3

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

3.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 13.4

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

4

624

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

46.85 [39.64, 54.07]

Analysis 13.5

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

5.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

4

624

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

46.85 [39.64, 54.07]

6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

278

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

41.12 [31.36, 50.87]

Analysis 13.6

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

6.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

2

278

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

41.12 [31.36, 50.87]

7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

3

412

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐0.85, ‐0.46]

Analysis 13.7

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

7.1 Children

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

3

412

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐0.85, ‐0.46]

8 Change in number of night‐time awakenings per week compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

277

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.25, ‐0.11]

Analysis 13.8

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in number of night‐time awakenings per week compared to baseline.

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in number of night‐time awakenings per week compared to baseline.

8.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

2

277

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.25, ‐0.11]

9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

3

409

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.37 [‐1.79, ‐0.96]

Analysis 13.9

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

9.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

3

409

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.37 [‐1.79, ‐0.96]

10 Methacholine BHR (log base 2 PC20 FEV1 mg/ml) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 13.10

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Methacholine BHR (log base 2 PC20 FEV1 mg/ml).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Methacholine BHR (log base 2 PC20 FEV1 mg/ml).

10.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.18, 14.99]

Analysis 13.11

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

11.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.18, 14.99]

12 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 13.12

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).

12.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 13.13

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).

13.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 8 hour area under curve (AUC) plasma cortisol during 6 hour 250 mcg co‐syntropin infusion (mcg hour/dL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 13.14

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 8 hour area under curve (AUC) plasma cortisol during 6 hour 250 mcg co‐syntropin infusion (mcg hour/dL).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 8 hour area under curve (AUC) plasma cortisol during 6 hour 250 mcg co‐syntropin infusion (mcg hour/dL).

14.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Peak plasma cortisol during during 6 hour 250 mcg co‐syntropin infusion (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 13.15

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Peak plasma cortisol during during 6 hour 250 mcg co‐syntropin infusion (mcg/dL).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Peak plasma cortisol during during 6 hour 250 mcg co‐syntropin infusion (mcg/dL).

15.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 13.16

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

16.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

671

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.08, 0.15]

Analysis 13.17

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

17.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Adults

5

671

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.08, 0.15]

18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

524

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.95 [1.83, 13.43]

Analysis 13.18

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

18.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Adults

4

524

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.95 [1.83, 13.43]

19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

770

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.99 [3.54, 18.01]

Analysis 13.19

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

19.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

6

770

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.99 [3.54, 18.01]

20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

770

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.77 [2.32, 9.80]

Analysis 13.20

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

20.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 Adults

6

770

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.77 [2.32, 9.80]

21 HRQOL: AQLQ Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 13.21

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 HRQOL: AQLQ.

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 HRQOL: AQLQ.

21.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22 Log PD20 mg Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 13.22

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Log PD20 mg.

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Log PD20 mg.

22.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23 FVC (absolute values ‐ Litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 13.23

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 FVC (absolute values ‐ Litres).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 FVC (absolute values ‐ Litres).

23.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24 Withdrawals (any reason) Show forest plot

2

130

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.91, 4.00]

Analysis 13.24

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 Withdrawals (any reason).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 Withdrawals (any reason).

24.1 Children

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24.2 Adults

2

130

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.91, 4.00]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 14. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (litres) Show forest plot

3

73

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.22, 0.48]

Analysis 14.1

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).

1.1 1‐4 weeks

2

42

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.54, 0.30]

1.2 1‐5 months

1

31

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.04, 1.28]

1.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

3

414

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.43, 0.63]

Analysis 14.2

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

2.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 1‐5 months

3

414

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.43, 0.63]

2.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

4

624

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

46.85 [39.64, 54.07]

Analysis 14.5

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

5.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 1‐5 months

4

624

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

46.85 [39.64, 54.07]

5.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

278

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

41.12 [31.36, 50.87]

Analysis 14.6

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

6.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 1‐5 months

2

278

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

41.12 [31.36, 50.87]

6.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

3

412

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐0.85, ‐0.46]

Analysis 14.7

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

7.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 1‐5 months

3

412

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐0.85, ‐0.46]

7.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Change in number of night‐time awakening per week compared to baseline score Show forest plot

2

277

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.85, ‐0.36]

Analysis 14.8

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 8 Change in number of night‐time awakening per week compared to baseline score.

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 8 Change in number of night‐time awakening per week compared to baseline score.

8.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 1‐5 months

2

277

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.85, ‐0.36]

8.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

3

409

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.37 [‐1.79, ‐0.96]

Analysis 14.9

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

9.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 1‐5 months

3

409

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.37 [‐1.79, ‐0.96]

9.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.18, 14.99]

Analysis 14.11

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

11.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 1‐5 months

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.18, 14.99]

11.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No.of patients) Show forest plot

4

566

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.07, 0.15]

Analysis 14.17

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No.of patients).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No.of patients).

17.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 1‐5 months

4

566

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.07, 0.15]

17.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

419

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.65 [1.70, 18.79]

Analysis 14.18

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

18.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 1‐5 months

3

419

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.65 [1.70, 18.79]

18.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

665

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.92 [3.25, 19.30]

Analysis 14.19

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

19.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 1‐5 months

5

665

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.92 [3.25, 19.30]

19.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

770

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.77 [2.32, 9.80]

Analysis 14.20

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

20.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 1‐5 months

5

665

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.99 [1.76, 9.03]

20.3 6 months or longer

1

105

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.89 [1.93, 40.93]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 15. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (litres) Show forest plot

3

73

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.22, 0.48]

Analysis 15.1

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).

1.1 1‐4 weeks

2

42

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.54, 0.30]

1.3 MDI

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.4 DPI

1

31

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.04, 1.28]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

3

414

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.43, 0.63]

Analysis 15.2

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

2.1 MDI

1

159

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.38, 0.66]

2.2 DPI

2

255

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.40, 0.67]

5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

3

422

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

49.38 [40.83, 57.93]

Analysis 15.5

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

5.1 MDI

1

169

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

58.0 [43.82, 72.18]

5.2 DPI

2

253

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

44.46 [33.75, 55.17]

6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

278

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

41.12 [31.36, 50.87]

Analysis 15.6

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

6.1 MDI

1

159

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

48.0 [35.35, 60.65]

6.2 DPI

1

119

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

31.0 [15.67, 46.33]

7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

3

412

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐0.85, ‐0.46]

Analysis 15.7

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

7.1 MDI

1

159

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.76 [‐1.08, ‐0.44]

7.2 DPI

2

253

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.59 [‐0.84, ‐0.34]

8 Change in night‐time awakening per week compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

277

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.85, ‐0.36]

Analysis 15.8

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 8 Change in night‐time awakening per week compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 8 Change in night‐time awakening per week compared to baseline.

8.1 MDI

1

159

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.73 [‐1.06, ‐0.41]

8.2 DPI

1

118

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐0.80, ‐0.07]

9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

3

409

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.37 [‐1.79, ‐0.96]

Analysis 15.9

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

9.1 MDI

1

159

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.96 [‐1.48, ‐0.44]

9.2 DPI

2

250

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.06 [‐2.74, ‐1.39]

11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.18, 14.99]

Analysis 15.11

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

11.1 MDI

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.18, 14.99]

11.2 DPI

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

566

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.07, 0.15]

Analysis 15.17

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

17.1 MDI

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.08 [0.05, 0.13]

17.2 DPI

2

255

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.16 [0.09, 0.28]

18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

419

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.65 [1.70, 18.79]

Analysis 15.18

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

18.1 MDI

1

152

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.29 [0.45, 117.74]

18.2 DPI

2

267

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.33 [1.41, 20.20]

19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

665

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.92 [3.25, 19.30]

Analysis 15.19

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

19.1 MDI

3

398

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.06 [2.87, 22.61]

19.2 DPI

2

267

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.53 [1.29, 43.98]

20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

770

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.77 [2.32, 9.80]

Analysis 15.20

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

20.1 MDI

4

503

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.28 [3.14, 21.84]

20.2 DPI

2

267

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.41 [0.82, 7.08]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 16. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (litres) Show forest plot

3

73

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.22, 0.48]

Analysis 16.1

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).

1.1 Mild

3

73

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.22, 0.48]

1.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 Moderate

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

3

414

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.43, 0.63]

Analysis 16.2

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

2.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Mild to moderate

2

281

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.39, 0.61]

2.3 Moderate

1

133

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.41, 0.81]

5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

3

422

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

49.38 [40.83, 57.93]

Analysis 16.5

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

5.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Mild to moderate

2

289

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

59.25 [48.43, 70.07]

5.3 Moderate

1

133

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

33.0 [19.06, 46.94]

6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

278

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

41.12 [31.36, 50.87]

Analysis 16.6

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

6.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Mild to moderate

2

278

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

41.12 [31.36, 50.87]

6.3 Moderate

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

3

412

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐0.85, ‐0.46]

Analysis 16.7

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

7.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Mild to moderate

2

279

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.70 [‐0.94, ‐0.46]

7.3 Moderate

1

133

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐0.91, ‐0.22]

8 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

2

277

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.85, ‐0.36]

Analysis 16.8

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Change in night‐time wakening score.

8.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Mild to moderate

2

277

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.85, ‐0.36]

8.3 Moderate

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

3

409

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.37 [‐1.79, ‐0.96]

Analysis 16.9

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

9.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Mild to moderate

2

276

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.28 [‐1.74, ‐0.83]

9.3 Moderate

1

133

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.8 [‐2.78, ‐0.82]

11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.18, 14.99]

Analysis 16.11

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

11.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Mild to moderate

1

159

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

14.53 [7.82, 27.01]

11.3 Moderate

1

152

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.25 [3.32, 11.79]

17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No.of patients) Show forest plot

4

566

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.07, 0.15]

Analysis 16.17

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No.of patients).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No.of patients).

17.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Mild to moderate

2

281

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [0.06, 0.16]

17.3 Moderate

2

285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.07, 0.19]

18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

419

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.65 [1.70, 18.79]

Analysis 16.18

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

18.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Mild to moderate

1

134

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.92 [1.08, 22.44]

18.3 Moderate

2

285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.13 [1.00, 51.03]

19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

665

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.92 [3.25, 19.30]

Analysis 16.19

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

19.1 Mild

1

82

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.77 [0.79, 76.88]

19.2 Mild to moderate

2

298

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.38 [2.50, 28.02]

19.3 Moderate

2

285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.23 [1.44, 36.28]

20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

770

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.77 [2.32, 9.80]

Analysis 16.20

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

20.1 Mild

2

187

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.53 [2.39, 30.39]

20.2 Mild to moderate

2

298

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.62 [1.03, 12.74]

20.3 Moderate

2

285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.61 [1.06, 12.23]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 17. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 2000 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 PD20 ‐ change from baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 17.1

Comparison 17 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 2000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 PD20 ‐ change from baseline.

Comparison 17 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 2000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 PD20 ‐ change from baseline.

1.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 18. FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute values) Show forest plot

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 18.1

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute values).

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute values).

1.1 Children

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 PEF (% predicted ‐ absolute values) Show forest plot

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 18.2

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 2 PEF (% predicted ‐ absolute values).

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 2 PEF (% predicted ‐ absolute values).

2.1 Children

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Quality of life (absolute scores ‐ AQLQ) Show forest plot

1

QoL (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 18.3

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 3 Quality of life (absolute scores ‐ AQLQ).

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 3 Quality of life (absolute scores ‐ AQLQ).

3.1 Children

0

QoL (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

QoL (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Symptoms Show forest plot

1

Symptom score (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 18.4

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 4 Symptoms.

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 4 Symptoms.

4.1 Children

0

Symptom score (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Symptom score (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Rescue medication usage (unclear time frame ‐ absolute values) Show forest plot

1

Puffs (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 18.6

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 6 Rescue medication usage (unclear time frame ‐ absolute values).

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 6 Rescue medication usage (unclear time frame ‐ absolute values).

6.1 Children

0

Puffs (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

1

Puffs (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 19. FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 Show forest plot

1

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 19.1

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1.

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1.

1.1 Children

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Throat irritation Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 19.2

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Throat irritation.

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Throat irritation.

2.1 Children

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Upper respiratory tract infections Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 19.3

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Upper respiratory tract infections.

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Upper respiratory tract infections.

3.1 Children

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Lower respiratory tract infection Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 19.4

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Lower respiratory tract infection.

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Lower respiratory tract infection.

4.1 Children

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 20. FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 500mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (absolute values) Show forest plot

1

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 20.1

Comparison 20 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 500mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (absolute values).

Comparison 20 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 500mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (absolute values).

1.1 Children

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 PC 20 Show forest plot

2

70

Doses (n) (Fixed, 95% CI)

2.45 [1.63, 3.27]

Analysis 20.2

Comparison 20 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 500mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 PC 20.

Comparison 20 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 500mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 PC 20.

2.1 Children

0

0

Doses (n) (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

2

70

Doses (n) (Fixed, 95% CI)

2.45 [1.63, 3.27]

3 Cortisol suppression Show forest plot

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 20.3

Comparison 20 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 500mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Cortisol suppression.

Comparison 20 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 500mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Cortisol suppression.

3.1 Children

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 21. FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 1000mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Cortisol suppression Show forest plot

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 21.1

Comparison 21 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 1000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Cortisol suppression.

Comparison 21 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 1000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Cortisol suppression.

1.1 Children

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 PC 20 Show forest plot

2

100

Doses (n) (Fixed, 95% CI)

2.82 [2.13, 3.51]

Analysis 21.2

Comparison 21 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 1000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 PC 20.

Comparison 21 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 1000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 PC 20.

2.1 Children

0

0

Doses (n) (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

2

100

Doses (n) (Fixed, 95% CI)

2.82 [2.13, 3.51]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 22. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of patients able to discontinue OCS completely Show forest plot

2

139

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

14.07 [7.17, 27.57]

Analysis 22.1

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 1 Number of patients able to discontinue OCS completely.

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 1 Number of patients able to discontinue OCS completely.

2 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg) Show forest plot

2

139

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.59 [‐9.92, ‐5.25]

Analysis 22.2

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 2 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg).

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 2 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg).

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

2

139

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.09, 0.43]

Analysis 22.3

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

139

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

50.85 [30.96, 70.73]

Analysis 22.4

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

139

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

26.52 [6.40, 46.65]

Analysis 22.5

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

139

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.76 [‐1.10, ‐0.41]

Analysis 22.6

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

7 Change in daily use of rescue beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

2

139

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.60 [‐5.04, ‐2.16]

Analysis 22.7

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 7 Change in daily use of rescue beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 7 Change in daily use of rescue beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 22.8

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline.

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline.

9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 22.9

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline.

10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in asthma symptoms domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 22.10

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in asthma symptoms domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in asthma symptoms domain compared to baseline.

11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 22.11

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline.

12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in enviromental exposure domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 22.12

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in enviromental exposure domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in enviromental exposure domain compared to baseline.

14 Sore throat (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

139

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.42 [0.33, 17.64]

Analysis 22.14

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 14 Sore throat (No. of patients).

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 14 Sore throat (No. of patients).

15 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

139

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.19 [1.41, 36.63]

Analysis 22.15

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 15 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 15 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

17 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

139

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.71 [1.98, 16.47]

Analysis 22.17

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 17 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 17 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Open in table viewer
Comparison 23. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of patients able to discontinue OCS completely Show forest plot

2

134

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.04 [0.02, 0.08]

Analysis 23.1

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 1 Number of patients able to discontinue OCS completely.

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 1 Number of patients able to discontinue OCS completely.

2 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg) Show forest plot

2

134

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐9.72 [‐12.10, ‐7.35]

Analysis 23.2

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 2 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 2 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg).

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

2

134

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.40, 0.76]

Analysis 23.3

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

134

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

94.35 [72.51, 116.19]

Analysis 23.4

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

134

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

66.14 [43.04, 89.24]

Analysis 23.5

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

134

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.03 [‐1.39, ‐0.67]

Analysis 23.6

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

7 Change in daily use of rescue beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

2

134

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.63 [‐6.10, ‐3.15]

Analysis 23.7

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 7 Change in daily use of rescue beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 7 Change in daily use of rescue beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 23.8

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline.

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline.

9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 23.9

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline.

10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in asthma symptoms domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 23.10

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in asthma symptoms domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in asthma symptoms domain compared to baseline.

11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 23.11

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline.

12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in enviromental exposure domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 23.12

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in enviromental exposure domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in enviromental exposure domain compared to baseline.

14 Sore throat (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 23.14

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 14 Sore throat (No. of patients).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 14 Sore throat (No. of patients).

15 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

134

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.63 [1.50, 38.92]

Analysis 23.15

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 15 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 15 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

16 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

134

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.62 [1.70, 12.51]

Analysis 23.16

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 16 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 16 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

FEV1 funnel plot.Funnel plot asymmetry of studies reporting change in FEV1 in the studies assembled. The distribution of effect estimates could actually be attributable to more than one common effect, rather than underreporting of negative data for this outcome.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

FEV1 funnel plot.

Funnel plot asymmetry of studies reporting change in FEV1 in the studies assembled. The distribution of effect estimates could actually be attributable to more than one common effect, rather than underreporting of negative data for this outcome.

FP100 withdrawals.In order to prevent 1 trial withdrawal due to clinical deterioration of asthma, 4 people would need to be treated with FP at 100mcg/d.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

FP100 withdrawals.

In order to prevent 1 trial withdrawal due to clinical deterioration of asthma, 4 people would need to be treated with FP at 100mcg/d.

FP200 withdrawals.NNT to show that three people need treatment with FP at 200mcg/d to prevent 1 withdrawal due to deterioration of asthma
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

FP200 withdrawals.

NNT to show that three people need treatment with FP at 200mcg/d to prevent 1 withdrawal due to deterioration of asthma

FP500 wthdrawals.NNT to show that 3 people need to be treated with FP at 500mcg/d to prevent one trial withdrawal due to deteriorating asthma
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

FP500 wthdrawals.

NNT to show that 3 people need to be treated with FP at 500mcg/d to prevent one trial withdrawal due to deteriorating asthma

FP1000 withdrawals.NNT to show that 3 people need treatment with FP at 1000mcg/d to prevent one withdrawal due to deterioration of asthma.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

FP1000 withdrawals.

NNT to show that 3 people need treatment with FP at 1000mcg/d to prevent one withdrawal due to deterioration of asthma.

FP500 pharyngitis.Graphic to demonstrate that for every 100 people treated with FP at a dose of 500 mcg, around 73 would need to be treated in order for one person to develop sore throat.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

FP500 pharyngitis.

Graphic to demonstrate that for every 100 people treated with FP at a dose of 500 mcg, around 73 would need to be treated in order for one person to develop sore throat.

FP1000 pharyngitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 7

FP1000 pharyngitis.

FP500 hoarse/dysphon.Graphic to demonstrate that 148 people need to be treated with FP500 in order for one to develop hoarseness/dysphonia
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 8

FP500 hoarse/dysphon.

Graphic to demonstrate that 148 people need to be treated with FP500 in order for one to develop hoarseness/dysphonia

FP1000 hoarse/dyspho.Graphic to demonstrate that 30 people need to be treated with FP1000 mcg/d in order for one to develop hoarseness/dysphonia
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 9

FP1000 hoarse/dyspho.

Graphic to demonstrate that 30 people need to be treated with FP1000 mcg/d in order for one to develop hoarseness/dysphonia

FP500 candidiasis.Visual graphic to demonstrate that 76 people would need to be treated with 500mcg/d of FP in order for one person to develop oral candidiasis
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 10

FP500 candidiasis.

Visual graphic to demonstrate that 76 people would need to be treated with 500mcg/d of FP in order for one person to develop oral candidiasis

FP1000 candidiasis.Graphic to demonstrate that 29 people need to be treated with FP1000mcg/d in order for one person to develop oral candidiasis
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 11

FP1000 candidiasis.

Graphic to demonstrate that 29 people need to be treated with FP1000mcg/d in order for one person to develop oral candidiasis

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 3 FEV1 ‐ Litres (absolute values).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 3 FEV1 ‐ Litres (absolute values).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in am PEF (predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in am PEF (predicted).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in evening PEF (predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in evening PEF (predicted).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 9 Peak flow ‐ L/min (absolute values).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 9 Peak flow ‐ L/min (absolute values).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 14 Symptoms ‐ absolute scores.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 14 Symptoms ‐ absolute scores.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 15 Change in night‐time wakening score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 15 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 16 Nighttime awakenings/night.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 16 Nighttime awakenings/night.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 17 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 17 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 18 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 18 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 19 Rescue medication usage ‐ puffs/d (absolute scores).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 19 Rescue medication usage ‐ puffs/d (absolute scores).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 20 HRQOL: AQLQ.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 20 HRQOL: AQLQ.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 21 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 21 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 22 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 22 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 23 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.23

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 23 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 24 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, social dimension.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.24

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 24 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, social dimension.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 25 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.25

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 25 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 26 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.26

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 26 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 27 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.27

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 27 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 28 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.28

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 28 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 29 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.29

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 29 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 30 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.30

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 30 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 31 Total urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.31

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 31 Total urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 32 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.32

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 32 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 33 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.33

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 33 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 34 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.34

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 34 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 35 Headaches.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.35

Comparison 1 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 35 Headaches.

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 Change in night‐time wakening score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 7 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 7 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 8 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 8 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 10 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.10

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 10 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.11

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 12 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.12

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 12 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 13 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.13

Comparison 2 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations), Outcome 13 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change in night‐time wakening score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 7 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 7 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 8 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 8 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 10 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 10 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 12 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 12 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 13 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.13

Comparison 3 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices), Outcome 13 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.9

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.10

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 16 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.16

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 16 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective.

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 18 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.18

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 18 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.21

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.22

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 23 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.23

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 23 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 24 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.24

Comparison 4 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 24 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (imputed estimates).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (imputed estimates).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FEV1 (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FEV1 (%).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute values).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute values).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 FEV1 (absolute values).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 FEV1 (absolute values).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.7

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.8

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Mean change in am PEF (% predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.9

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Mean change in am PEF (% predicted).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.10

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.11

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.12

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Peak flow L/min (absolute values).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.13

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Peak flow L/min (absolute values).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.14

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.15

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Histamine BHR (log base 2 PC20 FEV1 mg/ml).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.16

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Histamine BHR (log base 2 PC20 FEV1 mg/ml).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.17

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Change in night‐time wakening score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.18

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Change in symptom free days.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.19

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Change in symptom free days.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.20

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 Percentage nights without awakening ‐ change from baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.21

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 Percentage nights without awakening ‐ change from baseline.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.22

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.23

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 Change in nocturnal awakenings (unspecified time).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.24

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 Change in nocturnal awakenings (unspecified time).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 Symptoms (absolute values).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.25

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 Symptoms (absolute values).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.26

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 27 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d ‐ imputed estimates).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.27

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 27 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d ‐ imputed estimates).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 28 Change from baseline in rescue medication free days (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.28

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 28 Change from baseline in rescue medication free days (%).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 29 Rescue medication (absolute scores).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.29

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 29 Rescue medication (absolute scores).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 30 HRQOL: AQLQ (absolute socres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.30

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 30 HRQOL: AQLQ (absolute socres).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 31 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.31

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 31 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 32 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.32

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 32 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 33 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.33

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 33 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 34 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, social dimension.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.34

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 34 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, social dimension.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 35 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.35

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 35 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 36 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.36

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 36 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 37 Exacerbations requiring OCS treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.37

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 37 Exacerbations requiring OCS treatment.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 38 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.38

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 38 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 39 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.39

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 39 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 40 Withdrawals (any reason).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.40

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 40 Withdrawals (any reason).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 41 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.41

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 41 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 42 Adverse events (any).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.42

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 42 Adverse events (any).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 43 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.43

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 43 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 44 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.44

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 44 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 45 Headaches.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.45

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 45 Headaches.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 46 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.46

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 46 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 47 Upper respiratory tract infection.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.47

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 47 Upper respiratory tract infection.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 48 Sinusitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.48

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 48 Sinusitis.

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 49 Total urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.49

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 49 Total urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 50 AUC serum cortisol (ng*h/mL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.50

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 50 AUC serum cortisol (ng*h/mL).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 51 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.51

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 51 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 52 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.52

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 52 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 53 Change in peak plasma cortisol expression (mcg/dL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.53

Comparison 5 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 53 Change in peak plasma cortisol expression (mcg/dL).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.5

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 HRQOL: AQLQ.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.6

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 HRQOL: AQLQ.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.7

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 8 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.8

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 8 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.9

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 10 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.10

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 10 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.11

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.12

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.13

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.14

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 15 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.15

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 15 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 16 Withdrawals (any reason).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.16

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 16 Withdrawals (any reason).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.17

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.18

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.19

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 20 Headaches.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.20

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 20 Headaches.

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 21 Sinusitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.21

Comparison 6 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 21 Sinusitis.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.3

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.4

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.5

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.6

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 7 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.7

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 7 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 8 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.8

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 8 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.9

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.10

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 HRQOL: AQLQ.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.11

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 HRQOL: AQLQ.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.12

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.13

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.14

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 15 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.15

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 15 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 16 Withdrawals (any reason).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.16

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 16 Withdrawals (any reason).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.17

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.18

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.19

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 20 Headaches.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.20

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 20 Headaches.

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 21 Sinusitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.21

Comparison 7 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 21 Sinusitis.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.2

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.3

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.4

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 5 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.5

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 5 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 6 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.6

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 6 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.7

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.8

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.9

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.10

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 11 HRQOL: AQLQ.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.11

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 11 HRQOL: AQLQ.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.12

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.13

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.14

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 15 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.15

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 15 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 16 Withdrawals (any reason).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.16

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 16 Withdrawals (any reason).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.17

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.18

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.19

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 20 Headaches.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.20

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 20 Headaches.

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 21 Sinusitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.21

Comparison 8 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 21 Sinusitis.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute scores).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.2

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute scores).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEF.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.3

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEF.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.4

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in am PEF (% predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.5

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in am PEF (% predicted).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.6

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.7

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.8

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.9

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in number of night‐time awakenings per night.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.10

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in number of night‐time awakenings per night.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in % nights with no awakenings.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.11

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in % nights with no awakenings.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in night‐time wakening score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.12

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.13

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in percentage of symptom free days compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.14

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in percentage of symptom free days compared to baseline.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Change in percentage of rescue beta2 agonist free days compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.15

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Change in percentage of rescue beta2 agonist free days compared to baseline.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 HRQOL: AQLQ.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.16

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 HRQOL: AQLQ.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.17

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.18

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.19

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Withdrawals (total).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.20

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Withdrawals (total).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.21

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.22

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.23

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 No. patients with </=18 mcg/dL poststimulation cortisol.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.25

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 No. patients with </=18 mcg/dL poststimulation cortisol.

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Plasma cortisol (AUC).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.26

Comparison 9 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Plasma cortisol (AUC).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.1

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.2

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline.

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.3

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.4

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in night‐time wakening score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.5

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.6

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.9

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.11

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 12 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.12

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 12 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 13 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.13

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 13 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 14 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.14

Comparison 10 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 14 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.1

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.2

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.3

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.4

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in night‐time wakening score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.5

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.6

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.9

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 10 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.10

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 10 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.11

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 12 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.12

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 12 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 13 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.13

Comparison 11 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 13 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.1

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.2

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline.

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.3

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 4 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.4

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 4 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 5 Change in night‐time wakening score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.5

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 5 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.6

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.7

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.8

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.9

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 10 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.10

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 10 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 11 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.11

Comparison 12 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 11 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.1

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.2

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.3

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.4

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.5

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.6

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.7

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in number of night‐time awakenings per week compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.8

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in number of night‐time awakenings per week compared to baseline.

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.9

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Methacholine BHR (log base 2 PC20 FEV1 mg/ml).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.10

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Methacholine BHR (log base 2 PC20 FEV1 mg/ml).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.11

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.12

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.13

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 8 hour area under curve (AUC) plasma cortisol during 6 hour 250 mcg co‐syntropin infusion (mcg hour/dL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.14

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 8 hour area under curve (AUC) plasma cortisol during 6 hour 250 mcg co‐syntropin infusion (mcg hour/dL).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Peak plasma cortisol during during 6 hour 250 mcg co‐syntropin infusion (mcg/dL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.15

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Peak plasma cortisol during during 6 hour 250 mcg co‐syntropin infusion (mcg/dL).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.16

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.17

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.18

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.19

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.20

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 HRQOL: AQLQ.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.21

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 HRQOL: AQLQ.

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Log PD20 mg.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.22

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Log PD20 mg.

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 FVC (absolute values ‐ Litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.23

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 FVC (absolute values ‐ Litres).

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 Withdrawals (any reason).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.24

Comparison 13 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 Withdrawals (any reason).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.1

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.2

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.5

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.6

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.7

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 8 Change in number of night‐time awakening per week compared to baseline score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.8

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 8 Change in number of night‐time awakening per week compared to baseline score.

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.9

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.11

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No.of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.17

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No.of patients).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.18

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.19

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.20

Comparison 14 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.1

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.2

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.5

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.6

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.7

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 8 Change in night‐time awakening per week compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.8

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 8 Change in night‐time awakening per week compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.9

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.11

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.17

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.18

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.19

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.20

Comparison 15 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.1

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 1 FEV1 (litres).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.2

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.5

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.6

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.7

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Change in night‐time wakening score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.8

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 8 Change in night‐time wakening score.

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.9

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.11

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No.of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.17

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No.of patients).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.18

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.19

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.20

Comparison 16 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 17 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 2000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 PD20 ‐ change from baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 17.1

Comparison 17 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 2000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 PD20 ‐ change from baseline.

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute values).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 18.1

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute values).

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 2 PEF (% predicted ‐ absolute values).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 18.2

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 2 PEF (% predicted ‐ absolute values).

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 3 Quality of life (absolute scores ‐ AQLQ).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 18.3

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 3 Quality of life (absolute scores ‐ AQLQ).

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 4 Symptoms.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 18.4

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 4 Symptoms.

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 6 Rescue medication usage (unclear time frame ‐ absolute values).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 18.6

Comparison 18 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages), Outcome 6 Rescue medication usage (unclear time frame ‐ absolute values).

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 19.1

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1.

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Throat irritation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 19.2

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Throat irritation.

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Upper respiratory tract infections.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 19.3

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Upper respiratory tract infections.

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Lower respiratory tract infection.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 19.4

Comparison 19 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Lower respiratory tract infection.

Comparison 20 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 500mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (absolute values).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 20.1

Comparison 20 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 500mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (absolute values).

Comparison 20 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 500mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 PC 20.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 20.2

Comparison 20 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 500mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 PC 20.

Comparison 20 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 500mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Cortisol suppression.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 20.3

Comparison 20 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 500mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Cortisol suppression.

Comparison 21 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 1000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Cortisol suppression.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 21.1

Comparison 21 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 1000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Cortisol suppression.

Comparison 21 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 1000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 PC 20.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 21.2

Comparison 21 FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 1000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 PC 20.

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 1 Number of patients able to discontinue OCS completely.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.1

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 1 Number of patients able to discontinue OCS completely.

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 2 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.2

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 2 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg).

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.3

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.4

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.5

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.6

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 7 Change in daily use of rescue beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.7

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 7 Change in daily use of rescue beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.8

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline.

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.9

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in asthma symptoms domain compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.10

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in asthma symptoms domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.11

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in enviromental exposure domain compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.12

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in enviromental exposure domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 14 Sore throat (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.14

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 14 Sore throat (No. of patients).

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 15 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.15

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 15 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 17 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.17

Comparison 22 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d, Outcome 17 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 1 Number of patients able to discontinue OCS completely.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.1

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 1 Number of patients able to discontinue OCS completely.

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 2 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.2

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 2 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.3

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.4

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.5

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.6

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 7 Change in daily use of rescue beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.7

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 7 Change in daily use of rescue beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.8

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline.

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.9

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in asthma symptoms domain compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.10

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in asthma symptoms domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.11

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in enviromental exposure domain compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.12

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in enviromental exposure domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 14 Sore throat (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.14

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 14 Sore throat (No. of patients).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 15 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.15

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 15 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 16 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.16

Comparison 23 FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 16 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Table 1. Incomplete data not included in meta‐analysis

Study ID

Data

Allen 1997

Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF‐36A)
Living with asthma questionnaire
No SD values available for above outcomes

Sleep scale
No numerical data available for above outcome

Chervinsky 1994

Change in urinary free cortisol compared to baseline
Change in urinary 17‐hydroxy steroids compared to baseline
Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline
Change in plasma cortisol 60 min post cosyntropin
No SD values available for above outcomes

Ekroos 1998

Histamine bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PD15 FEV1)
Log transformed data not available

Faul 1998

FEV1 (after treatment: baseline ratio)
FEV1/FVC (after treatment: baseline ratio)
FEF 25‐75 (after treatment: baseline ratio)
Histamine bronchial responsiveness PC20 FEV1 (after treatment: baseline ratio)
Results expressed using medians and ranges for above outcomes

Galant 1999

Morning plasma cortisol
No numerical data available

Hart 2000

FEV1(reported as non‐significant)
am PEF

Both outcomes recorded but no data presented.

Hofstra 2000

PD20

Unable to ascertain distribution around geometric mean

Hoekstra 1997

Night‐time (4am) PEFR
Morning serum cortisol
Morning urine cortisol (collection time frame not specified)
No SD values available for above outcomes

Jayaram 2002

All outcomes reported in study could not be entered as dosage was unclear.

Jeffery 2002

FEV1; am PEF

Recorded but not reported.

Katz 1998

Change in FEV1 compared to baseline
Change in FVC compared to baseline
Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline
Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline
Change in night‐time awakening score compared to baseline
No SD values available for above outcomes

Langley 2002

Rescue medication usage

Median values reported.

Lindqvist 2003

FEV1 ‐ change from baseline in L/min
Symptoms ‐ change from baseline
Medication usage ‐ change from baseline

No SDs presented

MacKenzie 1993

FEV1
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Clinic PEFR
No SD values available for above outcomes

Daily asthma symptom score
Morning plasma cortisol
No numerical data available for above outcomes

Noonan 1998

Change in log e methacholine bronchial responsiveness PD20 FEV1
Error bars plotted on graphical display of results, but unclear whether these represent SD or SEM values

Olivieri 1997

Methacholine bronchial responsiveness PC20 FEV1
Randomised treatment groups were not compared: results expressed as change compared to baseline for each individual treatment group.

Overbeek 1996

Daily asthma symptom score
No numerical data available for above outcome

Pearlman 1997

Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline
No SD values available for above outcome

Morning serum cortisol
Plasma cortisol 30‐60 min post 250 mcg iv cosyntropin
No numerical data available for above outcome

Physician rated global assessment of efficacy
Data not presented in a form suitable for meta‐analysis

Wasserman 1996

Physician‐rated global assessment of effectiveness
Data not presented in a form suitable for meta‐analysis

Wolfe 1996

Change FEV1 compared to baseline
No SD values available for above outcome

Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline
Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline
Daily wheeze, cough, shortness of breath scores
Daily beta2 agonist use
Morning plasma cortisol
No numerical data available for above outcomes

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Incomplete data not included in meta‐analysis
Table 2. Search history detail

Issue of CLIB

Time frame of search

Search detail

Issue 3, 2001

All years to March 1999

Stage 1 electronic search: 6494 citations retrieved, 2162 unique citations imported to Inhaled Steroid Register; Stage 2 electronic search: Fluticasone Register: 258 citations (180 excluded on basis of abstract: 150 not RCT; 30 not chronic asthma in humans). 78 papers retrieved in full text form ‐ 50 excluded on full paper: 6 not RCT, 38 no randomised placebo arm, 2 treatment period < 1 week; 1 infants; 3 nebuliser delivery device; 28 papers meeting inclusion criteria; 21 unique studies meeting inclusion criteria. Other sources: Two studies (Galant 1999; Li 1999) were identified by GSK. These studies were published after the date of the final electronic search (March 1999). Five studies (Ekroos 1999; Hofstra 2000; Nathan 1999; Busse 2001; Van Schoor 2002) were identified as a result of searching respiratory society meeting abstracts.

Issue 2, 2005

March 1999 to January 2004

From handsearching the updated inhaled steroids search results (1301 additional references), a 'fluticasone' register was created consisting of 197 citations (121 references excluded from abstracts as irrelevant comparisons). Three studies reported data from two different trials each, and so two study identities were created for each study (Berger 2002 BD; Berger 2002 ICS; Sorkness 1999; Sorkness 1999a; Wolfe 2000 BD; Wolfe 2000 ICS). Seventy‐five references, pertaining to 55 studies were retrieved in full. We excluded studies for the following reasons: Wrong comparison (11); no clear diagnosis of asthma (2); acute asthma (1); not randomised (1). One study was a full published version of a previously included abstract (Busse 2001). Forty new studies were included in the January 2004 update:

Allen 2000; Arets 2002; Berger 2002 BD; Berger 2002 ICS; Casale 2001; Convery 2000; Corsico 2000; Derom 1999; Derom 2001; Falcoz 2000; Giannini 2003; Hart 2000; Jayaram 2002; Jeffery 2002; Kavuru 2000; Laforce 2000; Langley 2002; Lanz 2001; Li 1999a; Li 1999b; Lindqvist 2003; Micheletto 2000; Nathan 2000; Nielsen 2002; Parameswaren 2000; Pauwels 2002; Pearlman 1999; Pearlman 2002; Rooklin 2001; Shapiro 2000; Sorkness 1999; Sorkness 1999a; Sovijärvi 2003; van Grunsven 2000; van Rensen 1999; Ward 2001; Weinstein 2001; Wolfe 2000 BD; Wolfe 2000 ICS; ZuWallack 2000.

Issue 4, 2005

January 2004‐2005

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Search history detail
Table 3. Asthma severity: characteristics of included patients at baseline

Study ID

FEV1: incl. criteria

FEV1: mean baseline

Symptom frequency

OCS treatment

ICS treatment

Author opinion

Overall estimation

Agertoft 1997

Not stated

Not stated

No

Not stated

Mild

Mild

Allen 1998

>60

88‐89

Not stated

No

Approx. 50% patients ICS naive at baseline, 50% previous regular ICS use

Mild to moderate

Mild to moderate

Allen 2000

Not stated

61%

Not stated

Yes

Not stated

Not stated

Severe

Arets 2002

Not stated

99‐104

SABA >1600mcg/d during >30% days of last year excluded

No

Only ICS <100mcg/d

Mild

Mild

Berger 2002 BD

60‐85%

72‐71.9%

>/=2 puffs BD on 2 of last 7 days of run‐in; symptom scores >/=2 of last 7 days

No

Not within 1 month of study

Not stated

Mild to moderate

Berger 2002 ICS

60‐90%

75.9‐75.8%

</=30 puffs over past 7 days

No

For three months prior to randomisation

Not stated

Moderate

Boonsawat 2004

Not stated

Not stated

Requirement for SABAs alone

No

No

Mild

Mild

Busse 2001

50‐80

68‐69

Symptomatic despite treatment with short acting beta2 agonist

No

No

Not stated

Moderate

Casale 2001

>/=65%

3 Litres

Not stated

No

No

Mild to moderate

Mild to moderate

Chervinsky 1994

60‐90

71‐73

Not stated

No

Yes: at least 1 month regular treatment with BDP prior to study

Mild to moderate

Mild to moderate

Condemi 1997

50‐80

66‐68

"< 3 days needing > 12 puffs beta2 agonist in 7 days< 4 days with diurnal PEFR variability of > 20% in 7 days"

No

Yes: ICS for at least 1 month prior to study

Not stated

Moderate

Convery 2000

Not stated

100‐103

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Mild

Corsico 2000

>80%

98‐102

Stable asthma for previous 2 months

Not stated

Not stated

Mild

Mild

Derom 1999

>/=40%

80%

Exacerbation free for 1 month

No

No

Not stated

Mild

Derom 2001

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Unclear

Dorinsky 2004

50‐85%

Not stated

4 days of week preceding randomisation; pre‐treatment with SABA only

No

No

Not stated

Mild‐moderate

Ekroos 1999

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

No

No

Mild

Mild

Falcoz 2000

50‐80%

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Mild‐moderate

Mild‐moderate

Falcoz 2000a

50‐80%

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Mild‐moderate

Mild‐moderate

Faul 1998

>40

73

Not stated

No

No

Not stated

Unclear

Galant 1999

50‐80

65‐67

"Mean beta2 agonist use 3.5 puffs/dMean night awakenings/week 0.05 to 0.08"

No

24‐30% of patients ICS treated

Mild to moderate

Mild to moderate

Galant 1996

45‐75

60‐62

> 8 puffs/d beta2 agonist or 2‐4 night‐time awakenings in week run‐in

No

No

Mild to moderate

Moderate

Giannini 2003

Not stated

3.23 L
96 % predicted

Use of ß‐agonist during run‐in (unspecified)

Not stated

Not stated

Mild‐moderate

Mild

Given 2004

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

No

Not stated

Unclear

Unclear

Hart 2000

Not stated

98.5%

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Mild

Mild

Hoekstra 1996

>75

88‐92

Not stated

No

No

Moderate

Moderate

Hofstra 2000

Not stated

96.6‐93.2%

Not stated

No

No

Not stated

Unclear

Jayaram 2002

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Unclear

Jeffery 2002

Not stated

75.6%

Not stated

No

No ‐ SABA treatment only

Not stated

Mild

Katz 1998

Not stated

PEFR 75 (% predicted) or less

Asthma symptoms on at least 4 out of 10 days of run in period or at least one night‐time awakening in 10 days or 4 or puffs beta2 agonist on at least 4 days

No

No

Not stated

Moderate

Kavuru 2000

40‐85% predicted

64% predicted

Participants excluded if excessive use of SABA during run‐in, and frequent nocturnal awakenings

No

Yes

Not stated

Moderate

Kemp 2004

50‐100% predicted

82‐85% predicted

Mild stable asthma

No

No

Mild

Mild

LaForce 2000

50‐85% predicted

70‐73% predicted

Participants had to have stable asthma during run‐in

No

Pharmacotherapy required for at least 3 months prior to the study (irresepective of whether ICS or not)

Not stated

Mild‐moderate

Langley 2002

>/=60%

93.5%

Not stated

No

No

Not stated

Mild

Lanz 2001

50‐85%

75%

Not stated

No

No

Moderate

Mild‐moderate

Lawrence 1997

50‐80%

65‐68

"Mean beta2 agonist use 3.2 ‐ 4.2 puffs/d "

No

Yes: 3 months treatment or longer prior to study

Not stated

Moderate

Li 1999

>60

91

Not stated

No

No

Mild

Mild

Li 1999a

>60%

80‐83%

Use of SABA on 50% days in run‐in

No

Yes ‐ 12 months with BDP up to 500mcg/d

Not stated

Moderate

Li 1999b

>/=50%

82‐89%

Not stated

Prednisolone </=140mg in past year or equivalent

No

Not stated

Mild‐moderate

Lindqvist 2003

60‐100%

79‐83%

Participants were to have been 'symptomatic'

No

No

Not stated

Mild

Lipworth 2005

>/=70%

82%

Use of SABA 2 x per week for 6 months

No

No

Mild to moderate

Mild

MacKenzie 1993

Not stated

Not stated

"Patients had experienced a worsening of asthma with deterioration in lung function leading to change in medication or hospitalisation in last monthsymptoms on at least 4 out of 7 days "

No

No

Moderate

Moderate

Michelletto 2000

Not stated

73‐74%

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Mild‐moderate

Unclear

Nathan 1999

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

No

85% of patients receiving ICS

Not stated

Unclear

Nathan 2000

45‐75% predicted

63.3‐64.3

Not stated

No

Yes

Moderate

Moderate

Nelson 1999

40‐80

60‐62

Not stated

Yes

Almost 100% of patients receiving ICS

Severe

Severe

Nielsen 2002

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

No

Yes

Not stated

Unclear

Noonan 1998

60‐85

73‐76

"No more than 12 puffs/d beta2 agonistand no more than 3 nights with awakening due to asthma"

No

No

Mild to moderate

Moderate

Noonan 1995

40‐80

56‐57.4

Requirement for rescue beta2 agonist for 2 weeks prior to study due to symptoms

Yes

87% of patients receiving ICS

Severe

Severe

Olivieri 1997

> 80

98

< 2 puffs/d beta2 agonist

No

No

Mild

Mild

O'Shaughnessy 1993

> 60

Not stated

No

No

Not stated

Mild

Mild

Overbeek 1996

Not stated

84‐86

Not stated

No

Not stated

Not stated

Mild

Parameswaren 2000

Not stated

90.2

Few or no symptoms

No

No

Mild

Mild

Pauwels 2002

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Unclear

Pearlman 1997

50‐80

66‐67

"Mean beta2 agonist use 3.4‐4.1 puffs/dNo more than 12 puffs/d beta2 agonist and no more than 2 nights with awakening due to asthma symptoms in last 7 days"

No

Yes: at least 3 months

Moderate

Moderate

Pearlman 1999

50‐80% predicted

65‐69

No more than 12 puffs of SABA on more than 2 days during run‐in

No

Not in previous month

Not stated

Mild‐moderate

Pearlman 2002

45‐80% predicted

65.3‐65.6

Not stated

Not stated

Yes

Not stated

Moderate

Pearlman 2004

40‐85%

Not reported

Described as symptomatic

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Mild to moderate

Peden 1998

50‐85

72‐73

"No more than 12 puffs/d beta2 agonistand no more than 3 nights with awakening due to asthmaMean awakenings per night due to asthma 0.05 to 0.09Mean beta2 agonist use 1.4 to 2.0 puffs/d"

No

Some patients: amount and type of ICS not stated

Not stated

Moderate

Rooklin 2001

40‐85%

68%

Not stated

Not stated

Yes

Not stated

Moderate

SAS30021

Not stated (am PEF 50‐85% predicted)

Not stated (am PEF 75.2‐76.7% predicted)

Symptoms on >/=4 days of week prior to randomisation

No

No

Not stated

Mild

SAS30024

Not stated (pre‐BD PEF had to be >80% predicted)

3.1 Litres

0.57 puffs rescue medication per day

No

Not stated

Mild

Mild

Shapiro 2000

40‐85%

66‐68%

Not stated

No

Yes

Not stated

Moderate

Sheffer 1996

45‐75

62‐64

"During 7 day run‐in:> 2 night‐time awakenings due to asthma in last 7 days20% or greater PEFR diurnal variabilityat least one day in which 8 puffs beta2 agonist used "

No

No

Mild to moderate

Moderate

Sorkness 1999

>/=50%

83‐88%

Not stated

No

No

Mild to moderate

Mild to moderate

Sorkness 1999a

>/=50%

83‐88%

Not stated

No

No

Mild to moderate

Mild to moderate

Sovijärvi 2003

>/=65%

79‐84

Stable asthma

No

No

Mild

MIld

van Grunsven 2000

Not stated

93%

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Mild to moderate

van Rensen 1999

>75%

95.6‐96.2%

Stable asthma

No

No

Not stated

Mild

Van Schoor 2002

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

No

Not stated

Mild

Mild

Ward 2001

Not stated

91.3%

Mild to moderate symptomatic asthma

No

No

Mild to moderater

Mild to moderate

Wasserman 1996

50‐80

Not stated

"Mean beta2 agonist use 3.1 to 3.3 puffs/dDuring last 7 days run‐in no more than 12 puffs/d beta2 agonist and no more than 2 nights with awakening due to asthma"

No

No

Not stated

Moderate

Wolfe 1996

50‐80

64‐66

During 2 week run‐in period no more than 12 puffs/d beta2 agonist and no more than 2 nights with awakening due to asthma

No

Yes

Moderate

Moderate

Wolfe 2000 BD

50‐80

69

During 2 week run‐in: 0 days with >/= 12 puffs of SABA prn

No

No

Not stated

Mild‐moderate

Wolfe 2000 ICS

50‐80

70

During 2 week run‐in: 0 days with >/= 12 puffs of SABA prn

No

Yes ‐ for 3 months prior to study entry

Not stated

Moderate

ZuWallack 2000

50‐80%

66‐68%

Not stated

No

Yes

Not stated

Moderate

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Asthma severity: characteristics of included patients at baseline
Table 4. Criteria for trial withdrawal due to lack of efficacy

Study ID

FEV1

PEFR

Beta2 agonist use

Night‐time awakening

Exacerbations

Chervinsky 1994

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% decrease in morning or evening PEFR on 4 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

2 or more nights with 2 awakening out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

Any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Galant 1996

15% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease in morning PEFR on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

3 or more awakening in week prior to clinic visit

Katz 1997

15% or greater decrease compared to baseline

15% or greater decrease in morning PEFR on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

8 or more puffs on 2 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

2 or more nights with awakening out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

Kavuru 2000

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease from mean am PEF compared to baseline on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 2 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

2 or more awakening in week prior to clinic visit

Any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Nathan 2000

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

12 or more puffs on 2 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

2 or more awakening in week prior to clinic visit

Any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Pearlman 1997

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease in morning PEFR on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 2 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

2 or more awakening in week prior to clinic visit

Any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Peden 1997

15% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease in morning PEFR on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

3 or more awakening in week prior to clinic visit

Any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Shapiro 2000

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline on 3+ days out of preceding 7 prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 2 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

2 or more awakening in week prior to clinic visit

Any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Sheffer 1996

15% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease in morning PEFR on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

3 or more nights with awakening out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

Any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Wolfe 2000 (BD and ICS studies)

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

12 or more puffs on 2 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

2 or more awakening in week prior to clinic visit

Any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

ZuWallack 2000

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline on 3+ days out of preceding 7 prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 2 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

2 or more awakening in week prior to clinic visit

Any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Figuras y tablas -
Table 4. Criteria for trial withdrawal due to lack of efficacy
Table 5. Definitions of exacerbation leading to study withdrawal

Study ID

Definition

Allen 1998

Requirement for more than two 7‐day courses of oral corticosteroid for asthma exacerbation

Berger 2002

Requirement for treatmen with oral or parenteral steroids

Hoekstra 1996

Treatment with oral steroids

Oliveri 1997

Not given

Overbeek 1996

Not given

Pearlman 1999

Not given

Shapiro 2000

Requirement for emergency treatment, hospitalisation or usage of medication not allowed by study protocol

Figuras y tablas -
Table 5. Definitions of exacerbation leading to study withdrawal
Comparison 1. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

9

1364

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.25, 0.34]

1.1 Children

2

321

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.04, 0.20]

1.2 Adults

7

1043

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.32, 0.43]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

10

1673

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.18, 0.25]

2.1 Children

2

321

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.05, 0.18]

2.2 Adults

8

1352

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.21, 0.31]

3 FEV1 ‐ Litres (absolute values) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

10

1705

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

22.79 [19.07, 26.51]

4.1 Children

2

353

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

26.41 [18.03, 34.79]

4.2 Adults

8

1352

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

21.91 [17.76, 26.06]

5 Change in am PEF (predicted) Show forest plot

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Children

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

8

1794

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

11.46 [8.19, 14.74]

6.1 Children

2

780

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.98 [2.26, 11.71]

6.2 Adults

6

1014

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

15.60 [11.06, 20.15]

7 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

9

1954

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

12.08 [8.87, 15.30]

7.1 Children

2

780

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

6.98 [2.26, 11.70]

7.2 Adults

7

1174

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

16.51 [12.12, 20.91]

8 Change in evening PEF (predicted) Show forest plot

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

8.1 Children

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Peak flow ‐ L/min (absolute values) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second) Show forest plot

2

467

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.05, 0.34]

12.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

2

467

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.05, 0.34]

13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

8

1238

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐0.69, ‐0.46]

13.1 Children

2

353

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐0.73, ‐0.31]

13.2 Adults

6

885

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.73, ‐0.46]

14 Symptoms ‐ absolute scores Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

895

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.25 [‐0.38, ‐0.12]

15.1 Children

1

176

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.29 [‐0.59, 0.01]

15.2 Adults

5

719

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.24 [‐0.39, ‐0.09]

16 Nighttime awakenings/night Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

16.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

648

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.17, ‐0.05]

17.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Adults

4

648

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.17, ‐0.05]

18 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

9

1839

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.94 [‐1.14, ‐0.74]

18.1 Children

3

957

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.87, ‐0.33]

18.2 Adults

6

882

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.36 [‐1.66, ‐1.06]

19 Rescue medication usage ‐ puffs/d (absolute scores) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

19.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 HRQOL: AQLQ Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

20.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

21.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

22.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

23.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, social dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

24.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

25.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective Show forest plot

4

664

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.12 [3.76, 6.98]

26.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26.2 Adults

4

664

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.12 [3.76, 6.98]

27 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

27.1 Children

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

27.2 Adults

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

28 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

8

1479

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.20, 0.32]

28.1 Children

2

353

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.21, 0.49]

28.2 Adults

6

1126

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.23 [0.17, 0.31]

29 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

3

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.38, 3.20]

29.1 Children

1

604

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.33, 4.65]

29.2 Adults

2

353

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.15, 5.43]

30 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

2

197

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [‐1.05, 1.59]

30.1 Children

1

159

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [‐0.84, 2.24]

30.2 Adults

1

38

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.90 [‐3.46, 1.66]

31 Total urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

31.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

31.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

32 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

1336

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.98 [0.97, 4.04]

32.1 Children

2

821

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.71 [0.73, 3.99]

32.2 Adults

4

515

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.82 [0.74, 10.75]

33 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1215

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.00 [1.53, 16.37]

33.1 Children

2

395

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.19 [0.74, 69.93]

33.2 Adults

5

820

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.36 [1.09, 17.52]

34 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1298

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.45 [1.29, 9.26]

34.1 Children

3

653

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.98 [0.40, 9.85]

34.2 Adults

4

645

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.84 [1.39, 16.88]

35 Headaches Show forest plot

3

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.58, 1.17]

35.1 Children

1

604

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.50, 1.10]

35.2 Adults

2

353

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.57, 2.59]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all ages)
Comparison 2. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

10

1673

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.18, 0.25]

1.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 1‐5 months

10

1673

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.18, 0.25]

1.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

10

1705

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

22.79 [19.07, 26.51]

2.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 1‐5 months

10

1705

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

22.79 [19.07, 26.51]

2.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

9

1954

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

12.08 [8.87, 15.30]

3.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 1‐5 months

9

1954

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

12.08 [8.87, 15.30]

3.3 6 months or greater

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

8

1238

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐0.69, ‐0.46]

4.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 1‐5 months

8

1238

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐0.69, ‐0.46]

4.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

648

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.17, ‐0.05]

5.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 1‐5 months

4

648

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.17, ‐0.05]

5.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

895

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.25 [‐0.38, ‐0.12]

6.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 1‐5 months

6

895

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.25 [‐0.38, ‐0.12]

6.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

9

1839

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.94 [‐1.14, ‐0.74]

7.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 1‐5 months

9

1839

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.94 [‐1.14, ‐0.74]

7.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective Show forest plot

4

664

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.12 [3.76, 6.98]

8.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 1‐5 months

4

664

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.12 [3.76, 6.98]

8.3 6 months or greater

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

8

1479

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.20, 0.32]

9.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 1‐5 months

8

1479

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.20, 0.32]

9.3 6 months or greater

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

1336

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.98 [0.97, 4.04]

10.1 1‐4 weeks

1

38

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.38 [0.31, 18.63]

10.2 1‐5 months

4

1081

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.71 [0.73, 3.98]

10.3 6 months or greater

1

217

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.24 [0.55, 19.04]

11 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1215

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.00 [1.53, 16.37]

11.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 1‐5 months

6

998

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.36 [1.09, 17.52]

11.3 6 months or greater

1

217

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.19 [0.74, 69.93]

12 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1298

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.45 [1.29, 9.26]

12.1 1‐4 weeks

1

258

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.00, 6.93]

12.2 1‐5 months

5

823

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.77 [1.21, 11.79]

12.3 6 months or greater

1

217

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.19 [0.74, 69.93]

13 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

3

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.38, 3.20]

13.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 1‐5 months

3

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.38, 3.20]

13.3 6 months or greater

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all treatment durations)
Comparison 3. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

10

1673

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.18, 0.25]

1.1 MDI

4

559

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.32, 0.48]

1.2 DPI

6

1114

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.16 [0.12, 0.21]

2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

10

1705

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

22.79 [19.07, 26.51]

2.1 MDI

5

868

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

17.86 [12.36, 23.35]

2.2 DPI

5

837

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

26.98 [21.92, 32.04]

3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

9

1954

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

12.08 [8.87, 15.30]

3.1 MDI

3

381

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

19.11 [12.08, 26.14]

3.2 DPI

6

1573

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

10.22 [6.61, 13.84]

4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

8

1238

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐0.69, ‐0.46]

4.1 MDI

4

559

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐0.69, ‐0.35]

4.2 DPI

4

679

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.62 [‐0.78, ‐0.47]

5 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

648

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.17, ‐0.05]

5.1 MDI

3

488

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.09 [‐0.16, ‐0.02]

5.2 DPI

1

160

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.31, ‐0.05]

6 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

895

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.25 [‐0.38, ‐0.12]

6.1 MDI

4

559

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.35, ‐0.02]

6.2 DPI

2

336

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.36 [‐0.58, ‐0.14]

7 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

9

1839

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.94 [‐1.14, ‐0.74]

7.1 MDI

4

559

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.11 [‐1.48, ‐0.74]

7.2 DPI

5

1280

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.87 [‐1.11, ‐0.63]

8 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective Show forest plot

4

664

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.12 [3.76, 6.98]

8.1 MDI

2

336

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.15 [3.31, 8.02]

8.2 DPI

2

328

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.09 [3.30, 7.85]

9 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

8

1479

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.20, 0.32]

9.1 MDI

4

801

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.23 [0.16, 0.33]

9.2 DPI

4

678

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.20, 0.38]

10 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

1336

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.98 [0.97, 4.04]

10.1 MDI

2

187

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.02 [0.49, 18.64]

10.2 DPI

4

1149

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.83 [0.84, 3.98]

11 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1215

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.00 [1.53, 16.37]

11.1 MDI

3

492

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.71 [0.74, 18.49]

11.2 DPI

4

723

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.15 [1.23, 41.51]

12 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1298

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.45 [1.29, 9.26]

12.1 MDI

2

317

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.19 [0.54, 18.68]

12.2 DPI

5

981

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.58 [1.09, 11.75]

13 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

3

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.38, 3.20]

13.1 MDI

2

353

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.15, 5.43]

13.2 DPI

1

604

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.33, 4.65]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all delivery devices)
Comparison 4. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

10

1673

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.18, 0.25]

1.1 Mild

1

309

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.06, 0.10]

1.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.19, 0.51]

1.3 Moderate

8

1206

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.22, 0.31]

2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

10

1705

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

22.79 [19.07, 26.51]

2.1 Mild

1

309

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.60 [0.84, 16.36]

2.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

30.0 [17.98, 42.02]

2.3 Moderate

8

1238

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

26.61 [22.08, 31.14]

3 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

9

1954

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

12.08 [8.87, 15.30]

3.1 Mild

2

913

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

5.92 [1.52, 10.33]

3.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

30.00 [19.32, 40.68]

3.3 Moderate

6

883

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

16.51 [11.26, 21.76]

7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

8

1238

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐0.69, ‐0.46]

7.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [‐0.85, ‐0.21]

7.3 Moderate

7

1080

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.58 [‐0.70, ‐0.46]

8 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

648

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.17, ‐0.05]

8.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.25, 0.01]

8.3 Moderate

3

490

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.18, ‐0.04]

9 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

895

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.25 [‐0.38, ‐0.12]

9.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.29 [‐0.61, 0.02]

9.3 Moderate

5

737

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.24 [‐0.38, ‐0.09]

10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

9

1839

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.94 [‐1.14, ‐0.74]

10.1 Mild

1

604

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐0.76, ‐0.04]

10.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.83 [‐1.38, ‐0.28]

10.3 Moderate

7

1077

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.26 [‐1.52, ‐0.99]

16 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective Show forest plot

4

664

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.12 [3.76, 6.98]

16.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.06 [2.65, 9.67]

16.3 Moderate

3

506

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.14 [3.61, 7.31]

18 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

8

1479

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.20, 0.32]

18.1 Mild

1

313

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.53 [0.15, 379.73]

18.2 Mild to moderate

1

158

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.11, 0.38]

18.3 Moderate

6

1008

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.20, 0.34]

21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

1336

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.95 [0.93, 4.06]

21.1 Mild

1

604

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.42 [0.53, 3.79]

21.2 Mild to moderate

2

255

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.31 [0.66, 16.51]

21.3 Moderate

3

477

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.41 [0.46, 12.65]

22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1215

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.50 [1.06, 11.52]

22.1 Mild

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22.2 Mild to moderate

2

382

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.99 [0.58, 43.17]

22.3 Moderate

5

833

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.91 [0.69, 12.29]

23 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1298

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.81 [1.05, 7.48]

23.1 Mild

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23.2 Mild to moderate

3

560

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.08 [0.61, 15.51]

23.3 Moderate

4

738

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.65 [0.77, 9.11]

24 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

3

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.38, 3.20]

24.1 Mild

2

917

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.32, 3.11]

24.2 Mild to moderate

1

40

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.33 [0.09, 60.84]

24.3 Moderate

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 mcg/d or less (all degrees asthma severity)
Comparison 5. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

21

4790

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.21, 0.26]

1.1 Children

2

331

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.12, 0.25]

1.2 Adults

19

4459

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.22, 0.27]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (imputed estimates) Show forest plot

22

4936

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.21, 0.26]

2.1 Children

3

477

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.13, 0.24]

2.2 Adults

19

4459

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.22, 0.28]

3 Change in FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

5

674

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.95 [7.98, 11.91]

3.1 Children

2

192

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

11.28 [7.62, 14.94]

3.2 Adults

3

482

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.41 [7.07, 11.74]

4 Change in FEV1 (%) Show forest plot

2

280

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

13.05 [7.85, 18.25]

4.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

2

280

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

13.05 [7.85, 18.25]

5 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute values) Show forest plot

4

157

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

4.22 [0.94, 7.50]

5.1 Children

3

125

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

5.92 [2.22, 9.62]

5.2 Adults

1

32

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.0 [‐9.08, 5.08]

6 FEV1 (absolute values) Show forest plot

2

86

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [‐0.00, 0.13]

6.1 Children

1

68

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [‐0.00, 0.12]

6.2 Adults

1

18

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.59 [‐0.31, 1.49]

7 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline Show forest plot

24

5117

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

26.96 [24.51, 29.40]

7.1 Children

5

611

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

25.68 [20.09, 31.27]

7.2 Adults

19

4506

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

27.26 [24.54, 29.98]

8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

21

3752

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

29.29 [26.44, 32.14]

8.1 Children

3

509

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

27.50 [20.79, 34.21]

8.2 Adults

18

3243

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

29.69 [26.54, 32.83]

9 Mean change in am PEF (% predicted) Show forest plot

2

665

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [2.92, 6.05]

9.1 Children

1

241

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

6.0 [2.08, 9.92]

9.2 Adults

1

424

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

4.2 [2.49, 5.91]

10 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

15

3118

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

21.33 [18.26, 24.40]

10.1 Children

2

331

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

20.77 [13.06, 28.47]

10.2 Adults

13

2787

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

21.44 [18.09, 24.79]

11 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

16

3283

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

21.59 [18.55, 24.62]

11.1 Children

2

331

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

20.77 [13.07, 28.46]

11.2 Adults

14

2952

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

21.74 [18.44, 25.03]

12 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Peak flow L/min (absolute values) Show forest plot

2

50

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

68.07 [7.89, 128.25]

13.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

2

50

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

68.07 [7.89, 128.25]

14 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second) Show forest plot

2

1423

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.16, 0.34]

15.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

2

1423

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.16, 0.34]

16 Histamine BHR (log base 2 PC20 FEV1 mg/ml) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

16.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

20

3671

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.49 [‐0.56, ‐0.43]

17.1 Children

3

509

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.55 [‐0.72, ‐0.37]

17.2 Adults

17

3162

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.48 [‐0.56, ‐0.41]

18 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

884

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.59, ‐0.32]

18.1 Children

1

173

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.41 [‐0.71, ‐0.11]

18.2 Adults

5

711

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.47 [‐0.62, ‐0.32]

19 Change in symptom free days Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

19.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%) Show forest plot

3

971

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.03 [3.31, 10.75]

20.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 Adults

3

971

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.03 [3.31, 10.75]

21 Percentage nights without awakening ‐ change from baseline Show forest plot

2

208

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.65 [4.84, 16.46]

21.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21.2 Adults

2

208

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.65 [4.84, 16.46]

22 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

641

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.23, ‐0.12]

22.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22.2 Adults

4

641

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.23, ‐0.12]

23 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night Show forest plot

5

1359

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.17, ‐0.08]

23.1 Children

1

158

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.1 [‐0.16, ‐0.04]

23.2 Adults

4

1201

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.24, ‐0.09]

24 Change in nocturnal awakenings (unspecified time) Show forest plot

2

280

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.11, ‐0.02]

24.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24.2 Adults

2

280

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.11, ‐0.02]

25 Symptoms (absolute values) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

25.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

20

4899

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.20 [‐1.34, ‐1.05]

26.1 Children

3

509

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.04 [‐1.39, ‐0.70]

26.2 Adults

17

4390

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.23 [‐1.39, ‐1.07]

27 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d ‐ imputed estimates) Show forest plot

22

5111

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.01 [‐1.13, ‐0.88]

27.1 Children

3

509

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.04 [‐1.39, ‐0.70]

27.2 Adults

19

4602

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.00 [‐1.13, ‐0.87]

28 Change from baseline in rescue medication free days (%) Show forest plot

2

809

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.49 [5.48, 15.51]

28.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

28.2 Adults

2

809

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.49 [5.48, 15.51]

29 Rescue medication (absolute scores) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

29.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

29.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

30 HRQOL: AQLQ (absolute socres) Show forest plot

3

513

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.49, 0.87]

30.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

30.2 Adults

3

513

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.49, 0.87]

31 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

31.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

31.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

32 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

32.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

32.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

33 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

33.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

33.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

34 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, social dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

34.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

34.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

35 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

35.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

35.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

36 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

568

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [4.16, 8.16]

36.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

36.2 Adults

3

568

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [4.16, 8.16]

37 Exacerbations requiring OCS treatment Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

37.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

37.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

38 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

702

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.12, 0.39]

38.1 Children

2

248

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.09, 0.38]

38.2 Adults

2

454

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.11, 0.79]

39 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

4071

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.17, 0.24]

39.1 Children

2

351

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.13, 0.31]

39.2 Adults

15

3720

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.17, 0.25]

40 Withdrawals (any reason) Show forest plot

8

2080

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.31, 0.51]

40.1 Children

1

158

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.18, 0.61]

40.2 Adults

7

1922

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.42 [0.32, 0.54]

41 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

13

3595

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.31 [0.76, 2.27]

41.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

41.2 Adults

13

3595

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.31 [0.76, 2.27]

42 Adverse events (any) Show forest plot

4

884

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.84, 1.52]

42.1 Children

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

42.2 Adults

4

884

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.84, 1.52]

43 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

13

1887

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.55 [1.43, 4.56]

43.1 Children

3

395

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.54, 3.57]

43.2 Adults

10

1492

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.68 [1.76, 7.67]

44 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

3480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.82 [1.27, 2.60]

44.1 Children

2

372

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.54, 3.54]

44.2 Adults

15

3108

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [1.29, 2.80]

45 Headaches Show forest plot

10

2602

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.83, 1.38]

45.1 Children

1

158

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.39 [0.43, 4.50]

45.2 Adults

9

2444

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.81, 1.37]

46 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

10

1645

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.34 [2.83, 14.21]

46.1 Children

2

394

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.10 [0.83, 79.01]

46.2 Adults

8

1251

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.12 [2.58, 14.51]

47 Upper respiratory tract infection Show forest plot

3

1623

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.76, 1.49]

47.1 Children

1

158

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.41, 2.31]

47.2 Adults

2

1465

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.75, 1.55]

48 Sinusitis Show forest plot

5

2030

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.29 [0.84, 1.99]

48.1 Children

1

158

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.69 [0.60, 4.74]

48.2 Adults

4

1872

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.76, 1.96]

49 Total urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

49.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

49.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

50 AUC serum cortisol (ng*h/mL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

50.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

50.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

51 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

2

194

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.00 [‐1.33, 1.33]

51.1 Children

1

154

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [‐1.23, 1.83]

51.2 Adults

1

40

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.90 [‐3.57, 1.77]

52 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

52.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

52.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

53 Change in peak plasma cortisol expression (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

2

117

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐2.56, 1.36]

53.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

53.2 Adults

2

117

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐2.56, 1.36]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 6. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

22

4936

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.21, 0.26]

1.1 1‐4 weeks

1

46

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.05, 0.49]

1.2 1‐5 months

20

3627

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.24, 0.29]

1.3 6 months or longer

1

1263

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.1 [0.04, 0.16]

2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

5

674

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.95 [7.98, 11.91]

2.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 1‐5 months

5

674

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.95 [7.98, 11.91]

2.3 6 months or longer

0

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline Show forest plot

24

5117

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

26.96 [24.51, 29.40]

3.1 1‐4 weeks

1

46

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

11.0 [‐9.83, 31.83]

3.2 1‐5 months

22

3808

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

29.03 [26.27, 31.80]

3.3 6 months or longer

1

1263

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

20.1 [14.70, 25.50]

4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

16

3283

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

21.59 [18.55, 24.62]

4.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 1‐5 months

16

3283

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

21.59 [18.55, 24.62]

4.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

22

5111

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.01 [‐1.13, ‐0.88]

5.1 1‐4 weeks

1

46

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.90 [‐1.73, ‐0.07]

5.2 1‐5 months

20

3802

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.25 [‐1.39, ‐1.11]

5.3 6 months or longer

1

1263

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.44, 0.08]

6 HRQOL: AQLQ Show forest plot

3

513

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.49, 0.87]

6.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 1‐5 months

3

513

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.49, 0.87]

6.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

20

3671

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.49 [‐0.56, ‐0.43]

7.1 1‐4 weeks

1

46

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [‐0.37, 0.78]

7.2 1‐5 months

19

3625

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.50 [‐0.57, ‐0.44]

7.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%) Show forest plot

3

971

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.03 [3.31, 10.75]

8.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 1‐5 months

3

971

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.03 [3.31, 10.75]

8.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

884

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.59, ‐0.32]

9.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 1‐5 months

6

884

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.59, ‐0.32]

9.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night Show forest plot

5

1359

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.17, ‐0.08]

10.1 1‐4 weeks

1

158

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.1 [‐0.16, ‐0.04]

10.2 1‐5 months

4

1201

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.24, ‐0.09]

10.3 6 months or more

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

641

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.23, ‐0.12]

11.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 1‐5 months

4

641

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.23, ‐0.12]

11.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

568

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [4.16, 8.16]

12.3 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.4 1‐5 months

3

568

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [4.16, 8.16]

12.5 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

702

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.12, 0.39]

13.1 1‐4 weeks

1

46

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.00, 6.82]

13.2 1‐5 months

2

442

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.10, 0.66]

13.3 6 months or longer

1

214

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.09, 0.42]

14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

4071

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.17, 0.24]

14.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 1‐5 months

15

2667

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.17, 0.24]

14.3 6 months or longer

2

1404

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.08, 1.00]

15 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

13

3595

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.31 [0.76, 2.27]

15.1 1‐4 weeks

4

203

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.20 [0.74, 69.96]

15.2 1‐5 months

7

1988

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.56, 2.27]

15.3 6 months or longer

2

1404

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [0.50, 3.33]

16 Withdrawals (any reason) Show forest plot

8

2080

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.31, 0.51]

16.1 1‐4 weeks

2

117

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.78 [0.63, 22.68]

16.2 1‐5 months

5

664

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.21, 0.40]

16.3 6 months or longer

1

1299

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.41, 0.90]

17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

3480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.82 [1.27, 2.60]

17.1 1‐4 weeks

4

203

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.24, 4.10]

17.2 1‐5 months

10

1669

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.88 [1.15, 3.08]

17.3 6 months or longer

3

1608

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [1.09, 3.35]

18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

10

1645

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.34 [2.83, 14.21]

18.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 1‐5 months

8

1322

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.25 [2.69, 14.52]

18.3 6 months or longer

2

323

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.39 [0.46, 119.72]

19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

13

1887

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.55 [1.43, 4.56]

19.1 1‐4 weeks

1

60

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.92 [0.16, 399.84]

19.2 1‐5 months

10

1504

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.36 [1.30, 4.31]

19.3 6 months or longer

2

323

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.25 [0.45, 116.00]

20 Headaches Show forest plot

10

2602

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.83, 1.38]

20.1 1‐4 weeks

3

157

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.73 [0.90, 50.54]

20.2 1‐5 months

6

1160

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.75, 1.62]

20.3 6 months or longer

1

1285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.70, 1.41]

21 Sinusitis Show forest plot

5

2030

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.29 [0.84, 1.99]

21.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21.2 1‐5 months

4

745

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.64 [0.95, 2.85]

21.3 6 months or longer

1

1285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.44, 1.77]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all treatment durations)
Comparison 7. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

22

4936

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.21, 0.26]

1.1 MDI

9

1337

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.33, 0.43]

1.2 DPI

13

3599

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.16, 0.22]

2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

5

674

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.95 [7.98, 11.91]

2.1 MDI

1

202

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

10.5 [7.19, 13.81]

2.2 DPI

4

472

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.65 [7.20, 12.09]

3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline Show forest plot

24

5117

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

26.96 [24.51, 29.40]

3.1 MDI

10

1452

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

29.45 [24.97, 33.93]

3.2 DPI

14

3665

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

25.90 [22.98, 28.82]

4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

16

3283

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

21.59 [18.55, 24.62]

4.1 MDI

5

787

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

27.98 [22.34, 33.62]

4.2 DPI

11

2496

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

18.99 [15.40, 22.59]

5 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

20

3671

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.49 [‐0.56, ‐0.43]

5.1 MDI

7

1004

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.44 [‐0.57, ‐0.32]

5.2 DPI

12

2635

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.51 [‐0.59, ‐0.43]

5.3 Unclear

1

32

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%) Show forest plot

3

971

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.03 [3.31, 10.75]

6.4 MDI

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.5 DPI

3

971

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.03 [3.31, 10.75]

7 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night Show forest plot

5

1359

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.17, ‐0.08]

7.1 MDI

1

227

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.30, 0.00]

7.2 DPI

4

1132

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.17, ‐0.07]

8 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

641

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.23, ‐0.12]

8.1 MDI

3

485

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.21, ‐0.09]

8.2 DPI

1

156

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.24 [‐0.34, ‐0.14]

9 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

884

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.59, ‐0.32]

9.1 MDI

4

555

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.39 [‐0.56, ‐0.22]

9.2 DPI

2

329

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.56 [‐0.78, ‐0.34]

10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

22

5111

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.01 [‐1.13, ‐0.88]

10.1 MDI

8

1184

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.35 [‐1.60, ‐1.10]

10.2 DPI

14

3927

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.90 [‐1.04, ‐0.76]

11 HRQOL: AQLQ Show forest plot

3

513

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.49, 0.87]

11.4 MDI

3

513

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.49, 0.87]

11.5 DPI

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

568

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [4.16, 8.16]

12.1 MDI

3

568

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [4.16, 8.16]

12.2 DPI

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

702

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.12, 0.39]

13.1 MDI

1

46

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.00, 6.82]

13.2 DPI

3

656

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.12, 0.40]

14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

4071

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.17, 0.24]

14.1 MDI

7

1105

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.14, 0.24]

14.2 DPI

10

2966

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.17, 0.28]

15 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

13

3595

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.31 [0.76, 2.27]

15.1 MDI

6

778

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.35 [0.43, 4.21]

15.2 DPI

7

2817

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [0.70, 2.42]

16 Withdrawals (any reason) Show forest plot

8

2080

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.31, 0.51]

16.1 MDI

2

226

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.12, 0.37]

16.2 DPI

6

1854

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.35, 0.61]

17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

3480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.82 [1.27, 2.60]

17.1 MDI

8

1085

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.21 [1.26, 3.89]

17.2 DPI

9

2395

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.60 [1.01, 2.53]

18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

10

1645

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.34 [2.83, 14.21]

18.1 MDI

5

757

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.74 [2.13, 15.45]

18.2 DPI

5

888

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.72 [1.92, 31.07]

19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

13

1887

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.55 [1.43, 4.56]

19.1 MDI

6

834

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.26 [1.17, 9.06]

19.2 DPI

7

1053

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.27 [1.12, 4.59]

20 Headaches Show forest plot

10

2602

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.83, 1.38]

20.1 MDI

4

446

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.61, 1.87]

20.2 DPI

6

2156

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.80, 1.43]

21 Sinusitis Show forest plot

5

2030

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.29 [0.84, 1.99]

21.1 MDI

3

587

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.63 [0.85, 3.11]

21.2 DPI

2

1443

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.61, 1.92]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all delivery devices)
Comparison 8. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

22

4936

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.21, 0.26]

1.1 Mild

1

1263

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.1 [0.04, 0.16]

1.2 Mild to moderate

8

1320

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.22, 0.31]

1.3 Moderate

13

2353

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.23, 0.30]

2 Change in FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

5

674

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.95 [7.98, 11.91]

2.1 Mild

0

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Mild to moderate

2

304

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

10.08 [6.69, 13.48]

2.3 Moderate

3

370

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

9.88 [7.47, 12.29]

3 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline Show forest plot

24

5117

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

26.96 [24.51, 29.40]

3.1 Mild

2

1331

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

19.35 [14.47, 24.24]

3.2 Mild to moderate

6

1094

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

24.48 [19.32, 29.64]

3.3 Moderate

16

2692

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

31.64 [28.27, 35.01]

4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

16

3283

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

21.59 [18.55, 24.62]

4.1 Mild

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Mild to moderate

5

1305

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

18.22 [13.35, 23.09]

4.3 Moderate

11

1978

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

23.72 [19.84, 27.59]

5 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

20

3671

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.49 [‐0.56, ‐0.43]

5.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Mild to moderate

7

1518

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐0.53, ‐0.33]

5.3 Moderate

13

2153

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.54 [‐0.63, ‐0.45]

6 Change from baseline in symptom free days (%) Show forest plot

3

971

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.03 [3.31, 10.75]

6.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Mild to moderate

1

408

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.0 [‐1.02, 9.02]

6.3 Moderate

2

563

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.72 [5.18, 16.27]

7 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

4

641

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.23, ‐0.12]

7.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Mild to moderate

1

160

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.27, ‐0.07]

7.3 Moderate

3

481

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.24, ‐0.11]

8 Change from baseline in nighttime awakenings/night Show forest plot

5

1359

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.17, ‐0.08]

8.1 MDI

1

227

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.30, 0.00]

8.2 DPI

4

1132

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.17, ‐0.07]

9 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

6

884

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.59, ‐0.32]

9.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Mild to moderate

1

160

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [‐0.84, ‐0.21]

9.3 Moderate

5

724

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.44 [‐0.59, ‐0.29]

10 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

22

5111

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.01 [‐1.13, ‐0.88]

10.1 Mild

1

1263

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.44, 0.08]

10.2 Mild to moderate

7

1518

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.89 [‐1.10, ‐0.68]

10.3 Moderate

14

2330

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.50 [‐1.68, ‐1.31]

11 HRQOL: AQLQ Show forest plot

3

513

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.49, 0.87]

11.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Mild to moderate

1

168

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.17, 0.81]

11.3 Moderate

1

175

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.48, 1.18]

11.4 Unclear

1

170

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.43, 1.07]

12 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

568

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [4.16, 8.16]

12.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Mild to moderate

1

168

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.01 [5.46, 18.37]

12.3 Moderate

2

400

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.58 [3.05, 6.86]

13 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

702

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.12, 0.39]

13.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Mild to moderate

3

668

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.12, 0.42]

13.3 Moderate

1

34

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.02, 1.11]

14 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

4071

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.17, 0.24]

14.1 Mild

2

1404

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.08, 1.00]

14.2 Mild to moderate

4

906

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.14, 0.30]

14.3 Moderate

11

1761

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.17, 0.25]

15 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

13

3595

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.31 [0.76, 2.27]

15.1 Mild

3

1444

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.40 [0.56, 3.51]

15.2 Mild to moderate

6

1171

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.34 [0.50, 3.58]

15.3 Moderate

4

980

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.48, 3.07]

16 Withdrawals (any reason) Show forest plot

8

2080

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.31, 0.51]

16.1 Mild

1

1299

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.41, 0.90]

16.2 Mild to moderate

5

467

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.25, 0.60]

16.3 Moderate

2

314

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.16, 0.39]

17 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

17

3480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.82 [1.27, 2.60]

17.1 Mild

2

1394

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.97 [1.11, 3.49]

17.2 Mild to moderate

7

751

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.75, 2.53]

17.3 Moderate

8

1335

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.32 [1.16, 4.64]

18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

10

1645

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.34 [2.83, 14.21]

18.1 Mild

1

109

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.39 [0.46, 119.72]

18.2 Mild to moderate

2

382

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.22 [0.14, 363.83]

18.3 Moderate

7

1154

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.21 [2.62, 14.72]

19 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

13

1887

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.55 [1.43, 4.56]

19.1 Mild

1

109

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.26 [0.14, 365.74]

19.2 Mild to moderate

4

600

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.65 [0.67, 4.06]

19.3 Moderate

7

1155

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.39 [1.56, 7.36]

19.4 Unclear

1

23

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 Headaches Show forest plot

10

2602

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.83, 1.38]

20.1 Mild

1

1285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.70, 1.41]

20.2 Mild to moderate

7

965

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.73, 1.72]

20.3 Moderate

2

352

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.39 [0.61, 3.19]

21 Sinusitis Show forest plot

5

2030

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.29 [0.84, 1.99]

21.1 Mild

1

1285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.44, 1.77]

21.2 Mild to moderate

2

338

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.36 [0.61, 3.03]

21.3 Moderate

2

407

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.94 [0.91, 4.14]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 8. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity)
Comparison 9. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

6

872

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.39, 0.50]

1.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

6

872

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.39, 0.50]

2 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute scores) Show forest plot

2

50

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

24.43 [15.90, 32.95]

2.1 Children

1

26

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.30 [‐25.66, 34.26]

2.2 Adults

1

24

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

26.20 [17.31, 35.09]

3 Change in morning PEF Show forest plot

8

1116

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

40.44 [35.43, 45.45]

3.1 Children

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

8

1116

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

40.44 [35.43, 45.45]

4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

7

1076

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

40.12 [35.06, 45.17]

4.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

7

1076

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

40.12 [35.06, 45.17]

5 Change in am PEF (% predicted) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline Show forest plot

4

515

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

30.20 [22.52, 37.87]

6.1 Children

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

4

515

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

30.20 [22.52, 37.87]

7 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

3

354

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.96 [20.86, 37.06]

7.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

3

354

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.96 [20.86, 37.06]

8 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

8.1 Children

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

9 Change in number night‐time wakenings per week Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Change in number of night‐time awakenings per night Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Change in % nights with no awakenings Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

12.1 Children

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

13 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

13.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

14 Change in percentage of symptom free days compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

361

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

21.32 [13.54, 29.09]

14.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

2

361

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

21.32 [13.54, 29.09]

15 Change in percentage of rescue beta2 agonist free days compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

15.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 HRQOL: AQLQ Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

16.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.86 [4.09, 8.39]

17.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Adults

3

480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.86 [4.09, 8.39]

18 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

191

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.17, 0.98]

18.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Adults

2

191

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.17, 0.98]

19 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

847

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.10, 0.18]

19.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

5

847

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.10, 0.18]

20 Withdrawals (total) Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

20.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

21.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21.2 Adults

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.36 [2.65, 20.46]

22.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22.2 Adults

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.36 [2.65, 20.46]

23 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.37 [2.62, 15.48]

23.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23.2 Adults

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.37 [2.62, 15.48]

25 No. patients with </=18 mcg/dL poststimulation cortisol Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

25.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26 Plasma cortisol (AUC) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

26.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 9. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 10. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

6

872

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.39, 0.50]

1.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 1‐5 months

6

872

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.39, 0.50]

1.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline Show forest plot

8

1116

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

40.44 [35.43, 45.45]

2.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 1‐5 months

8

1116

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

40.44 [35.43, 45.45]

2.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

3

354

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.96 [20.86, 37.06]

3.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 1‐5 months

3

354

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.96 [20.86, 37.06]

3.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

4.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 1‐5 months

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

4.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

5.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 1‐5 months

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

5.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

6.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 1‐5 months

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

6.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.86 [4.09, 8.39]

9.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 1‐5 months

3

480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.86 [4.09, 8.39]

9.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

676

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.09, 0.17]

11.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 1‐5 months

4

676

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.09, 0.17]

11.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

12.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 1‐5 months

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

12.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.36 [2.65, 20.46]

13.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 1‐5 months

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.36 [2.65, 20.46]

13.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.37 [2.62, 15.48]

14.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 1‐5 months

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.37 [2.62, 15.48]

14.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 10. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all treatment durations)
Comparison 11. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

6

872

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.39, 0.50]

1.1 MDI

1

26

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.29, 0.63]

1.2 DPI

5

846

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.38, 0.50]

2 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline Show forest plot

8

1116

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

40.44 [35.43, 45.45]

2.1 MDI

2

230

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

34.84 [23.10, 46.58]

2.2 DPI

6

886

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

41.69 [36.15, 47.23]

3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

3

354

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.96 [20.86, 37.06]

3.1 MDI

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.3 [‐12.40, 29.00]

3.2 1DPI

2

331

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

32.69 [23.90, 41.49]

4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

4.1 MDI

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 DPI

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

5 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

5.1 MDI

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 DPI

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

6.1 MDI

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 DPI

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

9 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.86 [4.09, 8.39]

9.1 MDI

1

147

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.23 [2.74, 10.00]

9.2 DPI

2

333

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.16 [4.00, 9.49]

10 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

676

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.09, 0.17]

10.1 MDI

1

147

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.06, 0.21]

10.2 DPI

3

529

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.09, 0.18]

11 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

11.1 MDI

1

147

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 DPI

3

523

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

12 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.36 [2.65, 20.46]

12.1 MDI

1

147

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.93 [0.81, 77.43]

12.2 DPI

3

523

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.23 [2.30, 22.68]

13 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.37 [2.62, 15.48]

13.1 MDI

1

147

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.93 [0.81, 77.43]

13.2 DPI

4

694

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.12 [2.33, 16.07]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 11. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all delivery devices)
Comparison 12. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

6

872

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.39, 0.50]

1.1 Mild

1

26

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.29, 0.63]

1.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 Moderate

5

846

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.38, 0.50]

2 Change in morning PEFR compared with baseline Show forest plot

8

1116

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

40.44 [35.43, 45.45]

2.1 Mild

2

63

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

32.91 [12.00, 53.81]

2.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 Moderate

6

1053

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

40.90 [35.74, 46.06]

3 Change in evening PEF compared with baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

3

354

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.96 [20.86, 37.06]

3.1 Mild

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.3 [‐12.40, 29.00]

3.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.3 Moderate

2

331

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

32.69 [23.90, 41.49]

4 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

4.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 Moderate

4

682

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.22 [‐2.59, ‐1.84]

5 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

5.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.3 Moderate

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.96, ‐0.52]

6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

6.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.3 Moderate

4

685

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.01, ‐0.70]

7 Physician rated global efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.86 [4.09, 8.39]

7.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.3 Moderate

3

480

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.86 [4.09, 8.39]

8 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

506

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.09, 0.18]

8.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.3 Moderate

3

506

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.09, 0.18]

9 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

9.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.3 Moderate

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.11, 18.13]

10 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.36 [2.65, 20.46]

10.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.3 Moderate

4

670

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.36 [2.65, 20.46]

11 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.37 [2.62, 15.48]

11.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.3 Moderate

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.37 [2.62, 15.48]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 12. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity)
Comparison 13. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (litres) Show forest plot

3

73

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.22, 0.48]

1.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

3

73

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.22, 0.48]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

3

414

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.43, 0.63]

2.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

3

414

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.43, 0.63]

3 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

4

624

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

46.85 [39.64, 54.07]

5.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

4

624

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

46.85 [39.64, 54.07]

6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

278

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

41.12 [31.36, 50.87]

6.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

2

278

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

41.12 [31.36, 50.87]

7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

3

412

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐0.85, ‐0.46]

7.1 Children

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

3

412

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐0.85, ‐0.46]

8 Change in number of night‐time awakenings per week compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

277

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.25, ‐0.11]

8.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

2

277

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.25, ‐0.11]

9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

3

409

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.37 [‐1.79, ‐0.96]

9.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

3

409

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.37 [‐1.79, ‐0.96]

10 Methacholine BHR (log base 2 PC20 FEV1 mg/ml) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.18, 14.99]

11.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.18, 14.99]

12 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 8 hour area under curve (AUC) plasma cortisol during 6 hour 250 mcg co‐syntropin infusion (mcg hour/dL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Peak plasma cortisol during during 6 hour 250 mcg co‐syntropin infusion (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

15.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Withdrawal due to clinical asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

16.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

671

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.08, 0.15]

17.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Adults

5

671

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.08, 0.15]

18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

524

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.95 [1.83, 13.43]

18.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Adults

4

524

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.95 [1.83, 13.43]

19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

770

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.99 [3.54, 18.01]

19.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

6

770

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.99 [3.54, 18.01]

20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

770

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.77 [2.32, 9.80]

20.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 Adults

6

770

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.77 [2.32, 9.80]

21 HRQOL: AQLQ Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

21.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22 Log PD20 mg Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

22.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23 FVC (absolute values ‐ Litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

23.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24 Withdrawals (any reason) Show forest plot

2

130

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.91, 4.00]

24.1 Children

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24.2 Adults

2

130

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.91, 4.00]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 13. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 14. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (litres) Show forest plot

3

73

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.22, 0.48]

1.1 1‐4 weeks

2

42

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.54, 0.30]

1.2 1‐5 months

1

31

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.04, 1.28]

1.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

3

414

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.43, 0.63]

2.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 1‐5 months

3

414

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.43, 0.63]

2.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

4

624

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

46.85 [39.64, 54.07]

5.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 1‐5 months

4

624

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

46.85 [39.64, 54.07]

5.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

278

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

41.12 [31.36, 50.87]

6.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 1‐5 months

2

278

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

41.12 [31.36, 50.87]

6.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

3

412

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐0.85, ‐0.46]

7.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 1‐5 months

3

412

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐0.85, ‐0.46]

7.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Change in number of night‐time awakening per week compared to baseline score Show forest plot

2

277

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.85, ‐0.36]

8.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 1‐5 months

2

277

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.85, ‐0.36]

8.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

3

409

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.37 [‐1.79, ‐0.96]

9.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 1‐5 months

3

409

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.37 [‐1.79, ‐0.96]

9.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.18, 14.99]

11.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 1‐5 months

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.18, 14.99]

11.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No.of patients) Show forest plot

4

566

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.07, 0.15]

17.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 1‐5 months

4

566

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.07, 0.15]

17.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

419

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.65 [1.70, 18.79]

18.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 1‐5 months

3

419

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.65 [1.70, 18.79]

18.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

665

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.92 [3.25, 19.30]

19.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 1‐5 months

5

665

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.92 [3.25, 19.30]

19.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

770

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.77 [2.32, 9.80]

20.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 1‐5 months

5

665

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.99 [1.76, 9.03]

20.3 6 months or longer

1

105

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.89 [1.93, 40.93]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 14. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all treatment durations)
Comparison 15. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (litres) Show forest plot

3

73

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.22, 0.48]

1.1 1‐4 weeks

2

42

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.54, 0.30]

1.3 MDI

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.4 DPI

1

31

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.04, 1.28]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

3

414

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.43, 0.63]

2.1 MDI

1

159

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.38, 0.66]

2.2 DPI

2

255

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.40, 0.67]

5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

3

422

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

49.38 [40.83, 57.93]

5.1 MDI

1

169

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

58.0 [43.82, 72.18]

5.2 DPI

2

253

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

44.46 [33.75, 55.17]

6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

278

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

41.12 [31.36, 50.87]

6.1 MDI

1

159

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

48.0 [35.35, 60.65]

6.2 DPI

1

119

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

31.0 [15.67, 46.33]

7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

3

412

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐0.85, ‐0.46]

7.1 MDI

1

159

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.76 [‐1.08, ‐0.44]

7.2 DPI

2

253

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.59 [‐0.84, ‐0.34]

8 Change in night‐time awakening per week compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

277

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.85, ‐0.36]

8.1 MDI

1

159

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.73 [‐1.06, ‐0.41]

8.2 DPI

1

118

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐0.80, ‐0.07]

9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

3

409

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.37 [‐1.79, ‐0.96]

9.1 MDI

1

159

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.96 [‐1.48, ‐0.44]

9.2 DPI

2

250

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.06 [‐2.74, ‐1.39]

11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.18, 14.99]

11.1 MDI

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.18, 14.99]

11.2 DPI

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

566

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.07, 0.15]

17.1 MDI

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.08 [0.05, 0.13]

17.2 DPI

2

255

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.16 [0.09, 0.28]

18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

419

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.65 [1.70, 18.79]

18.1 MDI

1

152

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.29 [0.45, 117.74]

18.2 DPI

2

267

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.33 [1.41, 20.20]

19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

665

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.92 [3.25, 19.30]

19.1 MDI

3

398

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.06 [2.87, 22.61]

19.2 DPI

2

267

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.53 [1.29, 43.98]

20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

770

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.77 [2.32, 9.80]

20.1 MDI

4

503

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.28 [3.14, 21.84]

20.2 DPI

2

267

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.41 [0.82, 7.08]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 15. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all delivery devices)
Comparison 16. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (litres) Show forest plot

3

73

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.22, 0.48]

1.1 Mild

3

73

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.22, 0.48]

1.2 Mild to moderate

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 Moderate

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

3

414

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.43, 0.63]

2.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Mild to moderate

2

281

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.39, 0.61]

2.3 Moderate

1

133

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.41, 0.81]

5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

3

422

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

49.38 [40.83, 57.93]

5.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Mild to moderate

2

289

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

59.25 [48.43, 70.07]

5.3 Moderate

1

133

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

33.0 [19.06, 46.94]

6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

278

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

41.12 [31.36, 50.87]

6.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Mild to moderate

2

278

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

41.12 [31.36, 50.87]

6.3 Moderate

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

3

412

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐0.85, ‐0.46]

7.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Mild to moderate

2

279

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.70 [‐0.94, ‐0.46]

7.3 Moderate

1

133

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐0.91, ‐0.22]

8 Change in night‐time wakening score Show forest plot

2

277

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.85, ‐0.36]

8.1 Mild

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Mild to moderate

2

277

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.85, ‐0.36]

8.3 Moderate

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

3

409

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.37 [‐1.79, ‐0.96]

9.1 Mild

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Mild to moderate

2

276

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.28 [‐1.74, ‐0.83]

9.3 Moderate

1

133

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.8 [‐2.78, ‐0.82]

11 Physician‐rated efficacy: effective or very effective (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

311

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.62 [6.18, 14.99]

11.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Mild to moderate

1

159

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

14.53 [7.82, 27.01]

11.3 Moderate

1

152

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.25 [3.32, 11.79]

17 Withdrawal due to lack of treatment efficacy (No.of patients) Show forest plot

4

566

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.07, 0.15]

17.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Mild to moderate

2

281

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [0.06, 0.16]

17.3 Moderate

2

285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.07, 0.19]

18 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

419

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.65 [1.70, 18.79]

18.1 Mild

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Mild to moderate

1

134

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.92 [1.08, 22.44]

18.3 Moderate

2

285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.13 [1.00, 51.03]

19 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

665

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.92 [3.25, 19.30]

19.1 Mild

1

82

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.77 [0.79, 76.88]

19.2 Mild to moderate

2

298

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.38 [2.50, 28.02]

19.3 Moderate

2

285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.23 [1.44, 36.28]

20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

770

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.77 [2.32, 9.80]

20.1 Mild

2

187

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.53 [2.39, 30.39]

20.2 Mild to moderate

2

298

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.62 [1.03, 12.74]

20.3 Moderate

2

285

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.61 [1.06, 12.23]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 16. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 1000‐1500 mcg/d (all degrees asthma severity)
Comparison 17. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 2000 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 PD20 ‐ change from baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 17. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 2000 mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 18. FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (% predicted ‐ absolute values) Show forest plot

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Children

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 PEF (% predicted ‐ absolute values) Show forest plot

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Children

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Quality of life (absolute scores ‐ AQLQ) Show forest plot

1

QoL (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Children

0

QoL (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

QoL (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Symptoms Show forest plot

1

Symptom score (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Children

0

Symptom score (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Symptom score (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Rescue medication usage (unclear time frame ‐ absolute values) Show forest plot

1

Puffs (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Children

0

Puffs (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

1

Puffs (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 18. FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 100mcg/d or less (all ages)
Comparison 19. FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 Show forest plot

1

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Children

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Throat irritation Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Children

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Upper respiratory tract infections Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Children

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Lower respiratory tract infection Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Children

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 19. FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 20. FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 500mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (absolute values) Show forest plot

1

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Children

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 PC 20 Show forest plot

2

70

Doses (n) (Fixed, 95% CI)

2.45 [1.63, 3.27]

2.1 Children

0

0

Doses (n) (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

2

70

Doses (n) (Fixed, 95% CI)

2.45 [1.63, 3.27]

3 Cortisol suppression Show forest plot

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Children

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 20. FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 500mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 21. FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 1000mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Cortisol suppression Show forest plot

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Children

0

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 PC 20 Show forest plot

2

100

Doses (n) (Fixed, 95% CI)

2.82 [2.13, 3.51]

2.1 Children

0

0

Doses (n) (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

2

100

Doses (n) (Fixed, 95% CI)

2.82 [2.13, 3.51]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 21. FP versus placebo: Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 1000mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 22. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of patients able to discontinue OCS completely Show forest plot

2

139

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

14.07 [7.17, 27.57]

2 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg) Show forest plot

2

139

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.59 [‐9.92, ‐5.25]

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

2

139

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.09, 0.43]

4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

139

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

50.85 [30.96, 70.73]

5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

139

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

26.52 [6.40, 46.65]

6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

139

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.76 [‐1.10, ‐0.41]

7 Change in daily use of rescue beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

2

139

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.60 [‐5.04, ‐2.16]

8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in asthma symptoms domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in enviromental exposure domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14 Sore throat (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

139

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.42 [0.33, 17.64]

15 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

139

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.19 [1.41, 36.63]

17 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

139

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.71 [1.98, 16.47]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 22. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 1000‐1500 mcg/d
Comparison 23. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of patients able to discontinue OCS completely Show forest plot

2

134

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.04 [0.02, 0.08]

2 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg) Show forest plot

2

134

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐9.72 [‐12.10, ‐7.35]

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

2

134

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.40, 0.76]

4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

134

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

94.35 [72.51, 116.19]

5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

134

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

66.14 [43.04, 89.24]

6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

134

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.03 [‐1.39, ‐0.67]

7 Change in daily use of rescue beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

2

134

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.63 [‐6.10, ‐3.15]

8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in asthma symptoms domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in enviromental exposure domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14 Sore throat (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

15 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

134

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.63 [1.50, 38.92]

16 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

134

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.62 [1.70, 12.51]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 23. FP versus placebo: Parallel group studies, oral steroid dependent: 2000 mcg/d