Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Manualne naspram električnih četkica za zube za očuvanje oralnog zdravlja

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 17 junio 2014

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002281.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 20 abril 2005see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud oral

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Peter Robinson

    Correspondencia a: Department of Dental Public Health, School of Clinical Dentistry, Sheffield, UK

    [email protected]

  • Scott A Deacon

    South West Cleft Unit, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, UK

  • Chris Deery

    Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Edinburgh Dental Institute, Edinburgh, UK

  • Mike Heanue

    Dental Surgery, Private Dental Practice, Sheffield, UK

  • A Damien Walmsley

    Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Birmingham, UK

  • Helen V Worthington

    Cochrane Oral Health Group, MANDEC, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

  • Anne‐Marie Glenny

    Cochrane Oral Health Group, MANDEC, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

  • Bill C Shaw

    Cochrane Oral Health Group, MANDEC, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Contributions of authors

Bill Shaw and Helen Worthington wrote the protocol. Anne‐Marie Glenny, Bill Shaw, Mike Heanue, Peter Robinson and Damien Walmsley co‐ordinated the review. Bill Shaw and Peter Robinson wrote the letters to the authors. Bill Shaw, Scott Deacon, Chris Deery, Mike Heanue, Peter Robinson and Damien Walmsley independently and in duplicate assessed the eligibility of trials, extracted data and assessed the quality of the trials. Damien Walmsley and Peter Robinson provided the background and sourced information on brush action and plaque and gingival indices. Helen Worthington conducted the statistical analysis. Scott Deacon, Anne‐Marie Glenny and Mike Heanue checked and entered data. Peter Robinson and Mike Heanue wrote the review. Proof reading and numerical consistency checked by Anne‐Marie Glenny and Chris Deery.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, UK.

  • School of Dentistry, The University of Birmingham, UK.

  • Edinburgh Dental Institute, UK.

  • University of Sheffield, School of Dentistry, UK.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

disponible en

Bill Shaw and Helen Worthington were co‐researchers on a randomised controlled trial sponsored by Braun AG (Clerehugh 1998) through a grant to the University of Manchester. Damien Walmsley was a consultant and undertook laboratory trials of powered toothbrushes sponsored by Braun AG through a grant to the University of Birmingham.

Acknowledgements

disponible en

Thanks are due to Sylvia Bickley, Trials Search Co‐ordinator for the Oral Health Group for carrying out the searches for the review, Liz Asbridge for administration of the review, co‐ordination of databases and location of articles for the review. Thanks also go to Anne‐Marie Glenny and Emma Tavender for making available their expertise in the field of systematic reviews and experience of RevMan and Emma Tavender and Luisa Fernandez for copy editing the final draft.
For help with the translations of foreign papers our thanks go to Selva Can (German), Regina Mitezki (German), Giovanni Lodi (Italian).
We would also like to thank the following investigators who replied to our requests for additional information about their trials: J de Boever (Universitair Ziekenhuis, Gent), C Burge (University of Colorado), M Darby (Old Dominion University), A Dentino (Marquette University), W Killoy (University of Missouri), A Koerber (University of Illinois), I Moschén (Leopold‐Franzens‐Universität), R Nolden (Rheinishe Friedrich‐Wilhelms Universität), T Palmer (Clinical Research Associates), M Thompson (Gillette Company), P Warren (Gillette Company). For their help as referees, we express our thanks to Martin Addy, Nik Barstow, Sylvia Bickley, Robin Davies, Marco Esposito, Anne‐Marie Glenny, Eleanor Grey, Jayne Harrison, Lee Hooper, Ian Needleman and Richard Niederman.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Jun 17

Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health

Review

Munirah Yaacob, Helen V Worthington, Scott A Deacon, Chris Deery, A Damien Walmsley, Peter G Robinson, Anne‐Marie Glenny

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002281.pub3

2005 Apr 20

Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health

Review

Peter Robinson, Scott A Deacon, Chris Deery, Mike Heanue, A Damien Walmsley, Helen V Worthington, Anne‐Marie Glenny, Bill C Shaw

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002281.pub2

2003 Jan 20

Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health

Review

Mike Heanue, Scott A Deacon, Chris Deery, Peter G Robinson, A. Damien Walmsley, Helen V Worthington, W C Shaw, Bill C Shaw

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002281

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.