Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Assisted hatching on assisted conception (IVF & ICSI)

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 19 octubre 2005see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Ginecología y fertilidad

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2005 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Mourad MW Seif

    Correspondencia a: Academic Unit of Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Health, University of Manchester @ St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK

    [email protected]

  • Edmond CO Edi‐Osagie

    Women's Health Directorate, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, Lambeth Palace Road, UK

  • Cindy M Farquhar

    Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

  • Lee Hooper

    MANDEC, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Manchester, UK

  • Debbie A Blake

    Biotechnology Research Institute, Auckland University of Techology, Auckland, New Zealand

  • Phil McGinlay

    (Deceased), UK

Contributions of authors

Edmond Edi‐Osagie contributed to designing the review, publishing the protocol, data collection, developing a search strategy, undertaking searches, screening search results, organising retrieval of papers, screening retrieved papers against inclusion criteria, appraising quality of papers, abstracting data from papers, writing to authors of papers for additional information, data management for the review, interpretation of data, providing a methodological perspective, providing a clinical perspective, providing a policy perspective, writing the review, providing general advice on the review, and performing previous work that was the foundation of the review.

Lee Hooper developed the second search strategy, undertook the February 2002 searches, screened these search results, assessed inclusion of all potential studies, appraised the quality of, and abstracted data from, all included studies, analysed the data (meta‐analysis in RevMan, subgrouping, sensitivity analyses, meta‐regression in STATA), interpreted the data, provided a methodological perspective, provided a consumer perspective, wrote the methodology and results sections of the review and edited the final review.

Phil McGinlay contributed to designing the review, data collection for the review, developing a search strategy, undertaking searches, screening search results, organising retrieval of papers, screening retrieved papers against inclusion criteria, and appraising quality of papers. Mr. McGinlay unfortunately passed away before completion of this review.

Mourad Seif contributed to conceiving the review, designing the review, publishing the protocol, coordinating the review, data collection for the review, developing a search strategy, undertaking searches, screening search results, organising retrieval of papers, screening retrieved papers against inclusion criteria, arbitration on quality and data extraction of papers, interpretation of data, providing a methodological perspective, providing a clinical perspective, providing a policy perspective, editing the review, providing general advice on the review, and performing previous work that was the foundation of the review.

Cindy Farquhar updated the review in July 2005 by completing the new searches, selecting the studies, restructuring the table of comparisons, extracting the data and rewriting parts of the review.

Debbie Blake was involved in the 2005 update by cross checking newly extracted data, assessing inclusion criteria, subgroup analysis, editing and providing a scientific perspective to the updated text.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Trust, UK.

  • University of Manchester, UK.

  • University of Auckland, New Zealand.

External sources

  • Ministry of Health, New Zealand.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Sue Furness, Sarah Hetrick and Michelle Proctor of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group for help with literature searches, and Deborah Thornton (Librarian at St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester) for assistance in retrieving journal articles. We gratefully acknowledge those authors who provided extra information about their studies: Professors S Hellebaut, University of Ghent; BS Hurst, Charlotte, North Carolina; SE Lanzendorf, Eastern Virginia Medical School; F Olivennes, Hospital Antoine‐Beclere, Clamart; and MC Magli (SISMER, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Bologna).

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Mar 17

Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI))

Review

Lauren Lacey, Sibte Hassan, Sebastian Franik, Mourad W Seif, M Ahsan Akhtar

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub6

2012 Dec 12

Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI))

Review

Sarah‐Kate Carney, Sangeeta Das, Debbie Blake, Cindy Farquhar, Mourad M Seif, Linsey Nelson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub5

2009 Apr 15

Assisted hatching on assisted conception (IVF and ICSI)

Review

Sangeeta Das, Debbie Blake, Cindy Farquhar, Mourad MW Seif

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub4

2006 Jan 25

Assisted hatching on assisted conception (IVF and ICSI)

Review

Sangeeta Das, Debbie Blake, Cindy Farquhar, Mourad MW Seif

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub3

2005 Oct 19

Assisted hatching on assisted conception (IVF & ICSI)

Review

Mourad MW Seif, Edmond CO Edi‐Osagie, Cindy M Farquhar, Lee Hooper, Debbie A Blake, Phil McGinlay

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub2

2003 Oct 20

Effect(s) of assisted hatching on assisted conception (IVF & ICSI)

Review

Edmond CO Edi‐Osagie, Lee Hooper, Phil McGinlay, Mourad MW Seif

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001894

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.