Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Fenobarbital posnatal para la prevención de la hemorragia intraventricular en neonatos prematuros

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

Referencias de los estudios incluidos en esta revisión

Anwar 1986 {published data only}

Anwar M, Kadam S, Hiatt IM, Hegyi T. Phenobarbitone prophylaxis of intraventricular haemorrhage. Archives of Diseases in Childhood 1986;61:196‐7.

Bedard 1984 {published data only}

Bedard MP, Shankaran S, Slovis TL, Pantoja A, Dayal B. Poland RL. Effect of prophylactic phenobarbital on intraventricular hemorrhage in high‐risk infants. Pediatrics 1984;73:435‐9.

Donn 1981 {published data only}

Donn SM, Roloff DW, Goldstein GW. Prevention of intraventricular haemorrhage in preterm infants by phenobarbitone. Lancet 1981;ii:215‐7.

Kuban 1986 {published and unpublished data}

Kuban K, Leviton A, Brown ER. Krishnamoorthy K, Baglivo J, Sullivan KF, Allred E. Respiratory complications in low‐birth‐weight infants who received phenobarbital. American Journal of Diseases in Children 1987;141:996‐9.
Kuban KCB, Leviton A, Krishnamoorthy KS, Brown ER, Teele RL, Baglivo JA, et al. Neonatal intracranial hemorrhage and phenobarbital. Pediatrics 1986;77:443‐50.

Mas‐Munoz 1993 {published data only}

Mas‐Munoz RL, Udaeta‐Mora E, Barrera‐Reyes RH, Rivera‐Rueda MA, Morales‐Suarez M. Efecto del fenobarbital sobre la gravedad de la hemorragia intraventricular. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México 1993;50:376‐82.

Morgan 1982 {published data only}

Morgan MEI, Massey RF, Cooke RWI. Does phenobarbitone prevent periventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight babies: a controlled trial. Pediatrics 1982;70:186‐9.

Porter 1985 {published data only}

Porter FL, Marshall RE, Moore JA, Miller H. Effect of phenobarbital on motor activity and intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants with respiratory disease weighing less than 1500g. American Journal of Perinatology 1985;2:63‐6.

Ruth 1988 {published data only}

Ruth V, Virkola K, Paetau R, Raivio KO. Early high‐dose phenobarbital treatment for prevention of hypoxic‐ischemic brain damage in very low birth weight infants. Journal of Pediatrics 1988;112:81‐6.

Sluncheva 2006 {published data only}

Sluncheva B, Vakrilova L, Emilova Z, Garnizov T. Prevention of brain hemorrhage in infants with low and extremely low birth weight and infants treated with surfactants. Late observation. Akusherstvo i Ginekologii (Sofiia) 2006;45(3):34‐8. [MEDLINE: 16889186]

Whitelaw 1983 {published data only}

Whitelaw A, Placzek M, Dubowitz L, Lary S, Levene M. Phenobarbitone for prevention of periventricular haemorrhage in very low birth‐weight infants. A randomised double‐blind trial. Lancet 1983;ii:1168‐70.

Referencias de los estudios excluidos de esta revisión

Hope 1982 {published data only}

Hope PL, Stewart AL, Thorburn RJ, Reynolds O. Failure of phenobarbitone to prevent intraventricular haemorrhage in small preterm infants. Lancet 1982;1:444‐5.

Crowther 2003

Crowther CA, Henderson‐Smart DJ. Phenobarbital prior to preterm birth for preventing neonatal periventricular haemorrhage haemorrhage. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000164]

Goddard 1987

Goddard‐Finegold J, Armstrong DL. Reduction in incidence of periventricular intraventricular hemorrhages in hypertensive newborn beagles pretreated with phenobarbital. Pediatrics 1987;79:901‐6.

Gould 1987

Gould SJ, Howard S. An immunohistochemical study of the germinal matrix in the late gestation human fetal brain. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology 1987;13:421‐37.

Guzzetta 1986

Vohr BR, Garcia‐Coll C, Mayfield S, et al. Neurologic and developmental status related to the evolution pf visuo‐motor abnormalities from birth to 2 years of age in preterm infants with intraventricular hemorrhage. Journal of Pediatrics 1989;115:296‐302.

Hambleton 1975

Hambleton G, Wigglesworth JS. Origin of intraventricular haemorrhage in the preterm infant. Archieves of Disease in Childhood 1975;51:651‐9.

Hope 1988

Hope PL, Gould SJ, Howard S, Hamilton PA, Costello AM, Reynolds EO. Precision of ultrasound diagnosis of pathologically verified lesions in the brains of very preterm infants. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1988;30:457‐71. [MEDLINE: 1989005959]

Horbar 1992

Horbar J. Prevention of periventricular‐intraventricular hemorrhage. In: Sinclair JC, Bracken MB editor(s). Effective Care of the Newborn Infant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992:562‐89.

Levene 1982

Levene MI, Fawer CL, Lamont RF. Risk factors in the developmental of intraventricular haemorrhage in the preterm neonate. Archieves of Disease in Childhood 1982;57:410‐7. [MEDLINE: 1982230029]

Ment 1985

Ment LR, Stewart WB, Duncan CC. Beagle puppy model of intraventricular hemorrhage. Effect of superoxide dismutase on cerebral blood flow and prostaglandins. Journal of Neurosurgery 1985;62:563‐9.

Nakamura 1990

Nakamura Y, Okudera T, Fukuda S, et al. Germinal matrix hemorrhage of venous origin in preterm neonates. Human Pathology 1990;21:1059‐62.

Papile 1978

Papile L‐A, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhages; a study of infants with birth weights less than 1500 grams. Journal of Pediatrics 1978;92:529‐34.

Perlman 1983

Perlman JM, McMenamin JB, Volpe JJ. Fluctuating cerebral blood flow velocity in respiratory distress syndrome. Relation to the development of intraventricular hemorrhage. New England Journal of Medicine 1983;309:204‐9.

Roberts 2006

Roberts D, Dalziel S. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub2]

Schmidt 2001

Schmidt B, Davis P, Moddemann D, Ohlsson A, Roberts RS, Saigal S, Solimano A, Vincer M, Wright LL. Long‐term effects of indomethacin prophylaxis in extremely‐low‐birth‐weight infants infants. New England Journal of Medicine 2001;344:1966‐72. [PMID: 11430325]

Steen 1979

Steen PA, Mitchelfelder JD. Barbiturate protection in tolerant and nontolerant hypoxic mice: comparison with hypothermic protection. Anesthesiology 1979;50:404‐8. [MEDLINE: 1979207371]

Volpe 1995

Volpe JJ. Neurology of the Newborn. 3rd Edition. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1995:403‐463.

Whitelaw 2001

Whitelaw A. Repeated lumbar or ventricular punctures in newborns with intraventricular hemorrhage. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000216]

Whitelaw 2001a

Whitelaw A. Intraventricular streptokinase after intraventricular hemorrhage in newborn infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000498.pub2]

Whitelaw 2001b

Whitelaw A, Kennedy CR, Brion LP. Diuretic therapy for newborn infants with posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002270]

Wimberley 1982

Wimberley PD, Lou HC, Pedersen H, Hejl M, Lassen NA, Friis‐Hansen B. Hypertensive peaks in the pathogenesis of intraventricular hemorrhage in the newborn. Abolition by phenobarbitone sedation. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica 1982;71:537‐42.

Referencias de otras versiones publicadas de esta revisión

Whitelaw 1999

Whitelaw A. Postnatal phenobarbitone for the prevention of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1999, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001691]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Anwar 1986

Methods

Open randomised controlled trial.
Blinding of randomisation: can't tell.
No blinding of intervention.
Complete follow‐up: yes.
Blinding of main outcome measurement: can't tell.

Participants

Preterm infants with a birthweight below 1500g with no congenital malformations and no maternal phenobarbitone administration. N = 58

Interventions

Two loading doses of phenobarbital 10 mg/kg intravenously starting before 6 hours of age and the second loading dose 12 hours later, followed by a maintenance dose of 2.5 mg/kg every 12 hours for 7 days. Maintenance doses were adjusted to achieve trough phenobarbitone concentrations of 20 ‐ 30 mg/l

Outcomes

Papile grade of intraventricular hemorrhage by ultrasound on days 1,3,7, posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus, death. It is not clear that the ultrasonographers were blind to treatment allocation.

Notes

Cerebral ultrasound was not carried out prior to trial entry so it was not possible to exclude babies who already had IVH before the first dose of phenobarbitone.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Bedard 1984

Methods

Open randomised controlled trial.
Randomisation was by using a deck of cards but it is not clear how blinding to treatment allocation was achieved.
Blinding of intervention: no.
Blinding of main outcome measurement:yes.
Complete follow‐up: yes.

Participants

Infants less than 24 hours old with birthweights < 1500g or gestation < 33 weeks were all eligible. Infants with gestational ages between 33 and 36 weeks or birthweight > 1500g, were eligible if they required mechanical ventilation for RDS. Another requirement was a cranial ultrasound scan showing no haemorrhage. N = 42.

Interventions

Two intravenous loading doses of phenobarbital 10 mg/kg 12 hours apart, followed by maintenance doses of 2.5 mg/kg i.v.or orally every 12 hours for 6 days.

Outcomes

Ultrasound diagnosis of grade of intraventricular hemorrhage as mild (grade I or II on Papile scale) or medium/severe (grade III or IV on Papile scale). Death. Mechanical ventilation, pneumothorax, hypotension (< 2 SD below mean), pH < 7.2, pCO2 > 60 mm Hg, pCO2 < 25 mm HG, Bicarbonate administration (for metabolic acidosis).

Notes

Of 95 potential trial participants, 42 were excluded because of IVH on the initial ultrasound scan. The control group were, on average, 1.1 weeks less mature and 220g lighter than the phenobarbitone group. No infants excluded after enrolment.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Donn 1981

Methods

Open randomised controlled trial. Randomisation is described as by lottery but there is no description of how allocation concealment was achieved.
Blinding of intervention: no.
Complete follow‐up: yes.
Blinding of main outcome measurement: yes.

Participants

Infants with birthweights below 1500g, admitted to the NICU within 6 hours, without congenital malformations and where the mother had not received barbiturates during pregnancy. N = 60. No information on infants excluded or lost after enrolment.

Interventions

Two loading doses of 10 mg/kg phenobarbital each administered intravenously 12 hours apart. Maintenance does of 2.5 mg/hr every 12 hours were begun 12 hours after. Doses were adjusted to maintain serum concentrations in the 20‐30 micrograms/ml range for 7 days.

Outcomes

Papile grade of intraventricular hemorrhage on ultrasound, ventriculomegaly, mechanical ventilation, pneumothorax requiring drainage, hypercapnia (pCO2 > 60 mm Hg), hypotension ( systolic blood pressure 10 mm Hg below expected value or impaired perfusion), bicarbonate therapy, death.

Notes

Cerebral ultrasound was not carried out prior to trial entry so it was not possible to exclude babies who already had IVH before the first dose of phenobarbitone.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Kuban 1986

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, controlled trial. Identical numbered ampoules were prepared by the pharmacy.
Blinding of randomisation:yes.
Blinding of intervention: yes.
Complete follow‐up: yes.
Blinding of main outcome measurement: yes.

Participants

Inclusion criteria were a) birthweight <1751g b) endotracheal intubation before 12 hours c) absence of congenital anomaly d) no evidence of intracranial hemorrhage on ultrasound scan e) neonatal phenobarbital level < 5 micrograms/ml. N = 280. Of 291 enrolled, 11 had to be withdrawn and were excluded from analysis. 48 infants were excluded from enrolment because IVH was already present.

Interventions

Two loading doses of phenobarbital 10 mg/kg or placebo intravenously with a half hour interval. Twelve hours later, the baby received the first of nine maintenance doses of 2.5 mg/kg or placebo at 12 hour intervals.

Outcomes

Papile grade of intraventricular hemorrhage on ultrasound scan (any hemorrhage or severe grade III or IV) hemorrhage, acidosis (pH< 7.2 on day 1), pneumothorax/pulmonary interstitial emphysema, hypotension (< 30 mm Hg on day 1. Mortality data were by personal communication between Dr Kuban and Dr Horbar although age at death is not clear.

Notes

The randomisation failed to give a similar gestational age in the two treatment groups. Thus 52.4 % of the phenobarbitone group had gestational age < 30 weeks but this was true of only 41.5 % of the control group. The authors attempted to allow for this imbalance by analysis within weight groups.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Mas‐Munoz 1993

Methods

Open controlled trial. The method of randomisation is not described nor is any means of allocation concealment.
Blinding of intervention: no.
Complete follow‐up: yes.
Blinding of outcome measurement: can't tell.

Participants

Newborn infants with gestational ages between 27 and 34 weeks and who were ventilator dependent. N = 60. No information on infants excluded or lost after enrolment.

Interventions

Phenobarbital 20 mg/kg i.v. as a loading dose within 12 hours of birth followed by phenobarbitone 2.5 mg/kg every 12 hours for the next 5 days.

Outcomes

Cerebral ultrasound every 48 hours for 14 days. Intraventricular hemorrhage graded as I/II or III/IV on the Papile scale. Death. It is not clear whether the ultrasonographers were blind to treatment allocation.

Notes

Cerebral ultrasound was not carried out prior to trial entry so it was not possible to exclude babies who already had IVH before the first dose of phenobarbitone.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Morgan 1982

Methods

An open controlled trial using alternate allocation to phenobarbitone or no injection.
Blinding of randomisation: no.
Blinding of intervention: no.
Complete follow‐up: no.
Blinding of main outcome measurement: yes.

Participants

Infants with birthweights below 1250g and infants with birthweights 1250‐1500g who required mechanical ventilation in the first 24 hours. An ultrasound scan showing absence of intraventricular haemorrhage was also a requirement. N = 60. No information on infants excluded or lost after enrolment.

Interventions

A loading dose of 20 mg/kg phenobarbital intramuscularly at a median time of 2 hours after birth (range 1 ‐ 22 hours).

Outcomes

Papile grade of intraventricular hemorrhage on ultrasound, death, pneumothorax, hypercapnia (pCO2 >8 kPa), acidosis (pH< 7.15). The age limit for death is not specified but "one cot death". occurred at home at 4 months.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

D ‐ Not used

Porter 1985

Methods

Open randomised controlled trial. The method of randomisation is not described.
Blinding of randomisation: can't tell.
Blinding of intervention: no.
Complete follow‐up: yes.
Blinding of main outcome measurement.

Participants

Newborn infants with birthweight below 1500g with a normal cerebral ultrasound scan before 6 hours of birth and receiving respiratory supportt. N = 19. No information on infants excluded after enrolment.

Interventions

A loading dose of phenobarbital 30 mg/kg i.v. within 6 hours of birth, followed by a maintenance dose of 5 mg/kg per day for 72 hours.

Outcomes

Cerebral ultrasound scans were carried out daily by sonographers who were blind to the initial treatment allocation. Intraventricular hemorrhage was graded according to the Papile scale. Mechanical ventilation, pneumothorax, hypercapnia (> 60 mm Hg), acidosis (pH < 7.15). Death.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Ruth 1988

Methods

Open randomised controlled trial. Randomisation was by "lottery". Blinding of randomization: can't tell.
Complete follow‐up: yes.
Blinding of outcome measurement: yes.

Participants

Infants with birthweights below 1501g and gestational age 25 weeks or more, less than 4 hours old. Infants with malformations or maternal barbiturate treatment were excluded. N = 101. 111 infants were originally enrolled but 10 were excluded (7 in the phenobarbitone group and 3 in the control group) either because the gestational age was < 25 weeks or because of congenital anomaly.

Interventions

2 loading doses of phenobarbital 15 mg/kg i.v. were given 4 hours apart. Maintenance treatment with phenobarbitone 5 mg/kg per day was started 24 hours after the first dose and continued for 5 days.

Outcomes

Cerebral ultrasound scans were carried out on days 1,3,5 and 7 and then weekly. Intraventricular hemorrhage was graded according to the Papile scale. Neurodevelopmental assessment at 27 months of age. Neonatal death, postnatal death, mechanical ventilation (total and > 7days), pneumothorax.

Notes

Cerebral ultrasound was not carried out prior to trial entry so it was not possible to exclude babies who already had IVH before the first dose of phenobarbitone.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Sluncheva 2006

Methods

Randomised controlled trial

Participants

Infants with birthweights below 1500g and under 32 weeks gestation.

Interventions

5mg/kg/day dose of phenobarbital i.v. for the first 5 days

Outcomes

Cerebral ultrasound scans were carried out on days 1, 3, 5 and 10. Intraventricular hemorrhage was graded according to the Papile scale. Neonatal death, pulmonary haemorrage, oxygen requirement, respiratory rate, and patent ductus arterious up to 10 days of age.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Whitelaw 1983

Methods

Randomised double‐blind controlled trial. The infants received numered, identical ampoules for injection.
Blinding of randomization: yes.
Blinding of intervention: yes.
Complete follow‐up:yes.
Blinding of outcome measurement: yes.

Participants

Infants under 1500g with a normal cerebral ultrasound scan in the first 4 hours. N = 60. Two infants were excluded after randomisation because of congenital malformations and they were replaced.

Interventions

Phenobarbital 20 mg/kg or isotonic saline given i.v. or i.m. within 4 hours of birth. No maintenance doses given.

Outcomes

Intraventricular hemorrhage on cerebral ultrasound scans carried out daily for the two weeks and then weekly. Grading 1,2,3 according to Levene initially, subsequently reclassified to be compatible with Papile grading. Mechanical ventilation after injection, pneumothorax, hypercapnia (pCO2 > 8 kPa), acidosis (pH < 7.2), Death before discharge from hospital.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Hope 1982

Not a randomized or quasi‐randomised trial.

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Phenobarbital v control

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All intraventricular hemorrhage Show forest plot

9

740

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.87, 1.25]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 1 All intraventricular hemorrhage.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 1 All intraventricular hemorrhage.

2 Severe intraventricular hemorrhage Show forest plot

10

817

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.66, 1.24]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 2 Severe intraventricular hemorrhage.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 2 Severe intraventricular hemorrhage.

3 Ventricular dilatation or hydrocephalus Show forest plot

3

219

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.38, 2.08]

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 3 Ventricular dilatation or hydrocephalus.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 3 Ventricular dilatation or hydrocephalus.

4 Hypotension Show forest plot

3

382

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.97, 1.43]

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 4 Hypotension.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 4 Hypotension.

5 Pneumothorax/interstitial emphysema Show forest plot

8

682

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.28 [0.92, 1.77]

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 5 Pneumothorax/interstitial emphysema.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 5 Pneumothorax/interstitial emphysema.

6 Hypercapnia Show forest plot

5

241

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.73, 1.37]

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 6 Hypercapnia.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 6 Hypercapnia.

7 Acidosis Show forest plot

6

521

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.90, 1.51]

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 7 Acidosis.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 7 Acidosis.

8 Use of mechanical ventilation Show forest plot

5

323

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [1.06, 1.32]

Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 8 Use of mechanical ventilation.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 8 Use of mechanical ventilation.

9 Mild neurodevelopmental impairment Show forest plot

1

101

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.15, 2.17]

Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 9 Mild neurodevelopmental impairment.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 9 Mild neurodevelopmental impairment.

10 Severe neurodevelopmental impairment Show forest plot

1

101

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.44 [0.41, 5.04]

Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 10 Severe neurodevelopmental impairment.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 10 Severe neurodevelopmental impairment.

11 Death before discharge Show forest plot

9

740

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.64, 1.21]

Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 11 Death before discharge.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 11 Death before discharge.

12 All deaths during study Show forest plot

10

817

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.66, 1.21]

Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 12 All deaths during study.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 12 All deaths during study.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 1 All intraventricular hemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 1 All intraventricular hemorrhage.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 2 Severe intraventricular hemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 2 Severe intraventricular hemorrhage.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 3 Ventricular dilatation or hydrocephalus.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 3 Ventricular dilatation or hydrocephalus.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 4 Hypotension.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 4 Hypotension.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 5 Pneumothorax/interstitial emphysema.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 5 Pneumothorax/interstitial emphysema.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 6 Hypercapnia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 6 Hypercapnia.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 7 Acidosis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 7 Acidosis.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 8 Use of mechanical ventilation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 8 Use of mechanical ventilation.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 9 Mild neurodevelopmental impairment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 9 Mild neurodevelopmental impairment.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 10 Severe neurodevelopmental impairment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 10 Severe neurodevelopmental impairment.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 11 Death before discharge.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 11 Death before discharge.

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 12 All deaths during study.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Phenobarbital v control, Outcome 12 All deaths during study.

Comparison 1. Phenobarbital v control

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All intraventricular hemorrhage Show forest plot

9

740

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.87, 1.25]

2 Severe intraventricular hemorrhage Show forest plot

10

817

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.66, 1.24]

3 Ventricular dilatation or hydrocephalus Show forest plot

3

219

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.38, 2.08]

4 Hypotension Show forest plot

3

382

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.97, 1.43]

5 Pneumothorax/interstitial emphysema Show forest plot

8

682

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.28 [0.92, 1.77]

6 Hypercapnia Show forest plot

5

241

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.73, 1.37]

7 Acidosis Show forest plot

6

521

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.90, 1.51]

8 Use of mechanical ventilation Show forest plot

5

323

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [1.06, 1.32]

9 Mild neurodevelopmental impairment Show forest plot

1

101

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.15, 2.17]

10 Severe neurodevelopmental impairment Show forest plot

1

101

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.44 [0.41, 5.04]

11 Death before discharge Show forest plot

9

740

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.64, 1.21]

12 All deaths during study Show forest plot

10

817

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.66, 1.21]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Phenobarbital v control