Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Melatonina para la prevención y el tratamiento del 'jet lag'

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001520Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 22 abril 2002see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Trastornos mentales comunes

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Andrew Herxheimer

    Correspondencia a: London, UK

    [email protected]

  • Keith J Petrie

    Psychiatry & Behavioural Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Contributions of authors

AH wrote the protocol, searched for relevant papers, assessed and reviewed them, wrote the text of the review

KJP contributed to the protocol, searched for relevant papers, assessed and reviewed them, and contributed to the text of the review

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Auckland, New Zealand.

  • UK Cochrane Centre, UK.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

None [AH]; Keith Petrie has undertaken two of the trials reviewed.

Acknowledgements

We thank Andrea Suhner, Iain Chalmers and Paul Montgomery for valuable comments, Rebecca Hardy for statistical help, Jeffrey Aronson for advice on searching for published ADR reports, and the staff of the WHO Uppsala Monitoring Centre for providing unpublished reports from their database.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2002 Apr 22

Melatonin for the prevention and treatment of jet lag

Review

Andrew Herxheimer, Keith J Petrie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001520

Notes

August 2003.
This review has undergone considerable revision.

The statistical methods are now described more explicitly and mistakes in the meta‐analyses have been corrected. A new trial by Edwards and colleagues has also been included. Finally, in Table 2, the 6 reports of suspected interaction with warfarin are more explicitly described and identified.

Please note that the section 'Reviewers' conclusions ‐ Implications for practice' has been altered. Issue 2, 2006.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.