Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Techniques de résection / ablation de l'endomètre pour saignements menstruels abondants

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001501.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 octubre 2009see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Ginecología y fertilidad

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Anne Lethaby

    Correspondencia a: Section of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Population Health,University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    [email protected]

  • Martha Hickey

    The University of Melbourne, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

  • Ray Garry

    Gynaecological Surgery, University of Tesside and South Cleveland Hospital, Middlesbrough, Guisborough, UK

  • Josien Penninx

    Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands

Contributions of authors

Ray Garry commented on the final draft of an earlier version of the review.

Martha Hickey commented on the final list of included trials, extracted data from the included trials for earlier versions of the review, wrote the discussion and conclusion and commented on the draft of the protocol and an earlier version of the full review.

Anne Lethaby wrote the protocol, searched for relevant trials, assessed trials for eligibility for inclusion, extracted data from the included trials, assessed trials for risk of bias, compared the independent data extraction and clarified points of disagreement, entered the data and wrote and commented on the final review (excluding the discussion and conclusion).

Julie Brown performed independent selection of trials for the 2009 update.

Josien Penninx performed independent data extraction and assessment of risk of bias for the 2009 update.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • UK NHS, Not specified.

    The update in 2009 was funded by Dept of Health (England) Incentive Scheme 2008

Declarations of interest

The reviewers did not report any conflict of interest

Acknowledgements

The reviewers acknowledge and thank the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group for extensive support in the preparation of this review. Special thanks are due to Shauna Sylvester, Sarah Hetrick, Michelle Proctor and Jane Clarke (Managing Editor), Sue Furness, Ruth Withers and Marian Showell (Trials Search Coordinators), Neil Johnson (Editor) and Sue Hall (for secretarial assistance). The reviewers also thank Amy Goodwin, Manager of Clinical Research, Gyncare for extra data and answering queries on the Meyer trial, authors from some of the other trials (Abbott 2003; Boujida 2002; Perino 2004; Soysal 2001; van Zon‐Rabelink2003) and Joerg Neumann for translating the relevant sections of the Romer trial. The reviewers are also indebted to Sarah Hetrick of the Australasian Cochrane Centre who has helped with the update searching in 2004, extraction of data and addition of entries to the Characteristics of included studies.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Jan 22

Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding

Review

Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez, Anne Lethaby, Mihaela Grigore, Julie Brown, Martha Hickey, Cindy Farquhar

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001501.pub5

2013 Aug 30

Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding

Review

Anne Lethaby, Josien Penninx, Martha Hickey, Ray Garry, Jane Marjoribanks

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001501.pub4

2009 Oct 07

Endometrial resection / ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding

Review

Anne Lethaby, Martha Hickey, Ray Garry, Josien Penninx

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001501.pub3

2009 Jul 08

Endometrial destruction techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding

Review

Anne Lethaby, Martha Hickey, Ray Garry

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001501.pub2

2002 Apr 22

Endometrial destruction techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding

Review

Anne Lethaby, Martha Hickey

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001501

Differences between protocol and review

Title changed from Endometrial destruction techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding to Endometrial resection / ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding in December 2008.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.