Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Venepuncture versus heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

Eriksson 1999 {published and unpublished data}

Eriksson M, Gradin M, Schollin J. Oral glucose and venepuncture reduce blood sampling pain in newborns. Early Human Development 1999;55:211‐8.

Kvist 2002 {published and unpublished data}

Kvist LJ, Jonsson K, Tornestrand BM, Edwinson Mansson M. Can venepuncture reduce the pain of neonatal PKU‐sampling? A randomised study. Vard i Norden 2002;22:27‐30.

Larsson 1998 {published data only}

Larsson BA, Tannfeldt G, Lagercrantz H, Olsson GL. Venipuncture is more effective and less painful than heel lancing for blood tests in neonates. Pediatrics 1998;101:882‐6.

Shah 1997 {published and unpublished data}

Shah VS, Taddio A, Bennett S, Speidel BD. Neonatal pain response to heel stick vs. venepuncture for routine blood sampling. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1997;77:F143‐4.

References to studies excluded from this review

Logan 1999 {published data only}

Logan PW. Venepuncture versus heel prick for the collection of the newborn screening test. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 1999;17:30‐6.

Barker 1995

Barker DP, Rutter N. Exposure to invasive procedures in neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1995;72:F47‐8.

Brown 1987

Brown L. Physiologic responses to cutaneous pain in neonates. Neonatal Network 1987;5:18‐21.

Campos 1994

Campos GR. Rocking and pacifiers: Two comforting interventions for heel stick pain. Research in Nursing and Health 1994;17:321‐31.

CPS 2000

Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society, and Committee on Fetus and Newborn, Committee on Drugs, Section on Anesthesiology, Section on Surgery. American Academy of Pediatrics. Prevention and management of pain and stress in the neonate. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2000;5:31‐8.

Craig 1994

Craig KD, Hadjistavropoulos HD, Grunau RVE. A comparison of two measures of facial activity during pain in the newborn child. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 1995;19:305‐18.

Field 1984

Field T, Goldson E. Pacifying effects of non‐nutritive sucking on term and preterm neonates during heel stick procedures. Pediatrics 1984;74:1012‐5.

Fitzgerald 1989

Fitzgerald M, McIntosh N. Pain and analgesia in the newborn. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1989;64:441‐3.

Grunau 1987

Grunau RVE, Craig KD. Pain expression in neonates: facial action and cry. Pain 1987;28:395‐410.

Harpin 1983

Harpin VA, Rutter N. Making heel pricks less painful. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1983;58:226‐8.

Izard 1979

Izard CE. The maximally discriminative facial movement coding system (MAX). Newark DE: University of Delaware Instructional Resources Centre, 1979.

Jain 2001

Jain A, Rutter N, Ratnayaka M. Topical amethocaine gel for pain relief of heel prick blood sampling: a randomized double blind controlled trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal Neonatal Edition 2001;84:F56‐9.

Johnston 1986

Johnston CC, Strada ME. Acute pain response in infants: a mutidimensional description. Pain 1986;24:373‐82.

Larsson 1995

Larsson BA, Jylli L, Lagercrantz H, Olsson GL. Does a local anaesthetic cream (EMLA) alleviate pain from heel lancing in neonate?. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1995;39:1028‐31.

Larsson 1998a

Larsson BA, Tannfeldt G, Lagercrantz H, Olsson GL. Alleviation of the pain of venepuncture in neonates. Acta Paediatrica 1998;87:774‐9.

Lawrence 1993

Lawrence J, Alcock D, McGrath P, Kay J, MacMurray SB, Dulberg C. The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain. Neonatal Network 1993;12:59‐66.

McIntosh 1994

McIntosh N, van Vee L, Brameyer H. Alleviation of the pain of heel prick in preterm infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1994;79:177‐81.

McKay 1966

McKay RJ. Diagnosis and treatment: risks of obtaining samples of venous blood in infants. Pediatrics 1966;38:906‐8.

Meehan 1998

Meehan RM. Heelsticks in neonates for capillary blood sampling. Neonatal Network 1998;17:17‐24.

Moxley 1989

Moxley S. Neonatal heel puncture. The Canadian Nurse 1989;1:25‐7.

Ohlsson 2000

Ohlsson A, Taddio A, Jadad AR, Stevens BJ. Evidence‐based decision making, systematic reviews and the Cochrane Collaboration: implications for neonatal analagesia.. In: Anand KJS, Stevens BJ, McGrath PJ editor(s). Pain in neonates. 2nd Edition. Vol. 10, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000:251‐268.

Owens 1984

Owens ME, Todt EH. Pain in infancy: neonatal reaction to heel lance. Pain 1984;20:77‐86.

Paes 1993

Paes B, Janes M, Vegh P, LeDuca F, Andrew M. A comparative study of heel stick devices for infant blood collection. American Journal of Diseases of Children 1993;147:346‐8.

Ramenghi 1996

Ramenghi LA, Griffiths GC, Wood CM, Levene MI. Effect of non‐sucrose sweet tasting solution on neonatal heel prick responses. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1996;74:F129‐31.

Rushforth 1995

Rushforth JA, Griffiths G, Thorpe H, Levene MI. Can topical lignocaine reduce behavioural response to heel prick?. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1995;72:F49‐51.

Shah 1998

Shah VS, Taddio A, Ohlsson A. Randomized controlled trial of paracetamol for heel prick pain in neonates. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1998;79:F209‐11.

Shah 1999a

Shah V, Ohlsson A. Alleviation of the pain of venepuncture in neonates. Acta Paediatrica1999; Vol. 88:351‐52.

Skogdal 1997

Skogdal Y, Eriksson M, Schollin J. Analgesia in newborns given oral glucose. Acta Paediatrica 1997;86:217‐20.

Stevens 1996

Stevens B, Johnston C, Petryshen P, Taddio A. Premature infant pain profile: development and initial validation. The Clinical Journal of Pain 1996;12:13‐22.

Stevens 1999

Stevens B, Ohlsson A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library 2004, Issue 3.

Taddio 1995

Taddio A, Goldbach M, Ipp M, Stevens B, Koren G. Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain responses during vaccination in boys. Lancet 1995;345:291‐2.

Taddio 1997

Taddio A, Katz J, Ilersich AL, Koren G. Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination. Lancet 1997;349:599‐603.

References to other published versions of this review

Shah 1999b

Shah V, Ohlsson A. Venepuncture versus heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library 1999, Issue 2.

Shah 2001

Shah V, Ohlsson A. Venepuncture versus heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library 2001, Issue 1.

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Eriksson 1999

Methods

Randomized controlled trial.
Blinding of randomization:
Yes
Blinding of intervention:
No
Complete follow‐up: Yes
Blinding of outcome: Can't tell

Participants

Healthy full term infants undergoing metabolic screening blood test (n = 60).
Demographic data: Values are presented as mean (SD) or percentage (%).
Venepuncture group: n = 30.
Birth weight (g) 3667 (449).
Gestational age (wks) 39.7 (1.4).
Gender (%) male 40.
Heel lance group: n = 30.
Birth weight (g) 3578 (465).
Gestational age (wks) 40.2 (1.2).
Gender (%) male 53.

Interventions

Venepuncture (n=30) versus heel lance (n=30).

Outcomes

Pain assessments were made using the duration of cry within the first 3 minutes after the skin puncture, the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score and by changes in the heart rate.

Notes

Infants were randomized using a block randomization technique with sealed envelopes into one of the four groups ‐ HL and VP with and without oral administration of 1 ml of 30% glucose. Data on HL and VP group without the administration of glucose are included for this review.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Kvist 2002

Methods

Randomized controlled trial.
Blinding of randomization:
Yes
Blinding of intervention:
No
Complete follow‐up: No
Blinding of outcome: No

Participants

Healthy full term infants undergoing PKU screening (n = 90).
Demographic data for the small caliber venepuncture needle group (n = 25) and the HL group (n = 29) are presented. Values are presented as mean (range) or percentage (%)
Small caliber venepuncture needle group; weight 3613 g (range 2690 ‐ 4740), gestational age (40, 37‐42), age 4 days (3‐6), male sex 44%; For the heel lance group (n = 29) weight 3525 g (2710 ‐ 4650), gestational age 39 weeks (37 ‐ 42), age 5 days (3 ‐ 6), male sex 66%

Interventions

Venepuncture with large caliber needle (n = 30) (results not reported). Small caliber venepuncture needle (n = 30; 5 infants excluded) versus heel lance (n = 30; 1 infant excluded).

Outcomes

NIPS (Neonatal Infant Pain Scale) reported at the beginning of each minute, the first minute starting at the moment of puncture. All infants were observed for a minimum of 5 minutes. Number of punctures were also noted.

Notes

Infants were randomized using consecutively numbered envelopes. No envelope was taken out of sequence. Data for the large caliber venepuncture needle group were not presented as in 33% of the infants the venepuncture was unsuccessful. 5 infants in the small caliber venepuncture needle group and 1 infant in the heel lance group were excluded from the analyses because more than two skin punctures were required

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Larsson 1998

Methods

Randomized controlled trial.
Blinding of randomization: Yes
Blinding of intervention: No
Complete follow up: No
Blinding of outcome measurement: Yes

Participants

Healthy term infants undergoing blood testing for phenylketonuria (n=120).
Three infants in the small lancet group were excluded as one infant was of 35 weeks gestation and two infants screamed prior to heel lance.
Demographic data: Values are presented as median (range) or %.
Venepuncture group: n = 50.
Birth weight (g) 3410 (2440‐5035).
Gestational age (wks) 40 (36‐43).
Age (days) 3 (3‐7).
Gender (%) male 44.

Small lancet group: n = 47.
Birth weight (g) 3570 (2650‐4540).
Gestational age (wks) 40 (36‐43).
Age (days) 4 (3‐6).
Gender (%) male 55.

Large lancet group: n = 20.
Birth weight (g) 3398 (2160‐4330).
Gestational age (wks) 40 (37‐42).
Age (days) 4 (3‐7).
Gender (%) male 45.

Interventions

Venepuncture (n=50).
Heel lance with a small lancet (n=47).
Heel lance with a large lancet (n=20).
The authors do not explain the reasons for the unequal group sizes.

Outcomes

Pain assessments were made using Neonatal Facial Action Coding System (NFCS) and cry [latency (cry within 60 seconds of the skin puncture) and duration of first cry and total duration of cry]. Audiotapes were reviewed to determine the latency to cry from the skin puncture, duration of first cry and total time the infant cried during the procedure. Cry was defined as high‐pitched vocalization.

Notes

Infants were randomized using envelopes to receive VP, HL using a small lancet (SL) [three later excluded (one was a preterm infant and two infants screamed prior to heel lance)] or a large lancet (LL).
One investigator (neonatal nurse) performed all procedures.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Shah 1997

Methods

Randomized controlled trial.
Blinding of randomization: Yes
Blinding of intervention: No
Complete follow up: Yes
Blinding of outcome measurement: Can't tell

Participants

Healthy neonates of > =37 weeks gestational age (n=27).
Demographic data: Values are mean (SD) or number (%).
Heel lance group:
Age (days) 3.1 (1.1).
Gender (% male) 8 (57%).
State (% awake before procedure) 5 (36%).
Reason for test (% bilirubin) 13 (93%).

Venepuncture group:
Age (days) 2.8 (1.2).
Gender (% male) 8 (62%).
State (% awake before procedure) 7 (58%).
Reason for test (% bilirubin) 12 (97%).

Interventions

Venepuncture (n=13)
versus heel lance (n=14)
0.25 ml of blood was obtained with either method.

Outcomes

Pain assessments were made using Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS).
Parental rating of their own anxiety was assessed using a three point scale where 0= not worried at all, 1= a little worried and 2= very worried and infant's pain using a scale where 0= no pain at all, 1= a little pain and 2= a lot of pain.

Notes

Randomization was computer generated. Allocation was by sealed envelopes. One investigator (well‐trained pediatrician) performed all procedures. One of the reviewers (V. Shah) for this systematic review is the primary author of this paper.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Logan 1999

Not a randomized controlled trial.

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Venepuncture vs. heel lance

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Need for more than one skin puncture Show forest plot

3

204

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.18, 0.49]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 1 Need for more than one skin puncture.

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 1 Need for more than one skin puncture.

2 Pain response using NIPS score Show forest plot

2

81

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.84 [‐2.61, ‐1.06]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 2 Pain response using NIPS score.

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 2 Pain response using NIPS score.

3 Maternal anxiety score prior to the procedure Show forest plot

1

27

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.34, 1.26]

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 3 Maternal anxiety score prior to the procedure.

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 3 Maternal anxiety score prior to the procedure.

4 Infant's pain score as rated by the mother Show forest plot

1

27

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.80 [‐1.18, ‐0.42]

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 4 Infant's pain score as rated by the mother.

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 4 Infant's pain score as rated by the mother.

5 Cry within 60 seconds of the skin puncture Show forest plot

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.41, 0.81]

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 5 Cry within 60 seconds of the skin puncture.

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 5 Cry within 60 seconds of the skin puncture.

6 PIPP‐score Show forest plot

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.46 [‐4.29, ‐0.63]

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 6 PIPP‐score.

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 6 PIPP‐score.

7 Sampling time (seconds) Show forest plot

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

57.5 [‐23.64, 138.64]

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 7 Sampling time (seconds).

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 7 Sampling time (seconds).

8 Need for more than two skin punctures Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.62, 40.28]

Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 8 Need for more than two skin punctures.

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 8 Need for more than two skin punctures.

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 1 Need for more than one skin puncture.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 1 Need for more than one skin puncture.

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 2 Pain response using NIPS score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 2 Pain response using NIPS score.

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 3 Maternal anxiety score prior to the procedure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 3 Maternal anxiety score prior to the procedure.

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 4 Infant's pain score as rated by the mother.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 4 Infant's pain score as rated by the mother.

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 5 Cry within 60 seconds of the skin puncture.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 5 Cry within 60 seconds of the skin puncture.

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 6 PIPP‐score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 6 PIPP‐score.

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 7 Sampling time (seconds).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 7 Sampling time (seconds).

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 8 Need for more than two skin punctures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Venepuncture vs. heel lance, Outcome 8 Need for more than two skin punctures.

Comparison 1. Venepuncture vs. heel lance

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Need for more than one skin puncture Show forest plot

3

204

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.18, 0.49]

2 Pain response using NIPS score Show forest plot

2

81

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.84 [‐2.61, ‐1.06]

3 Maternal anxiety score prior to the procedure Show forest plot

1

27

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.34, 1.26]

4 Infant's pain score as rated by the mother Show forest plot

1

27

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.80 [‐1.18, ‐0.42]

5 Cry within 60 seconds of the skin puncture Show forest plot

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.41, 0.81]

6 PIPP‐score Show forest plot

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.46 [‐4.29, ‐0.63]

7 Sampling time (seconds) Show forest plot

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

57.5 [‐23.64, 138.64]

8 Need for more than two skin punctures Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.62, 40.28]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Venepuncture vs. heel lance