Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibióticos versus placebo para la conjuntivitis bacteriana aguda

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001211.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 12 septiembre 2012see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud ocular y de la visión

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Aziz Sheikh

    Correspondencia a: Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

    [email protected]

  • Brian Hurwitz

    King's College London, London, UK

  • Constant Paul van Schayck

    Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands

  • Susannah McLean

    Allergy & Respiratory Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

  • Ulugbek Nurmatov

    Allergy & Respiratory Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Contributions of authors

Conceiving the study: AS
Formulating the protocol: AS
Searching databases: IG
Selecting trials: UN, SM, AS
Extracting data: UN, SM
Checking extracted data: AS
Performing data synthesis: UN, SM
Writing the review: UN, SM, CS, AS, BH

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Edinburgh, UK.

  • King's College London, UK.

External sources

  • Maastricht University, Netherlands.

Declarations of interest

AS was a co‐author on the Rose 2005 trial. James Cave jointly conceived the study and formulated the protocol for this review.

Acknowledgements

  • Our thanks to the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group (CEVG) for their support throughout this review, and especially to Iris Gordon, Trials Search Co‐ordinator for CEVG and Anupa Shah, Managing Editor for CEVG.

  • We thank Andrew Tullo for peer reviewing a previous version of this review and Steve Tuft and Catey Bunce for reviewing the 2012 update.

Richard Wormald (Co‐ordinating Editor for CEVG) acknowledges financial support for his CEVG research sessions from the Department of Health through the award made by the National Institute for Health Research to Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology for a Specialist Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2023 Mar 13

Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis

Review

Yu-Yen Chen, Alison Su-Hsun Liu, Ulugbek Nurmatov, Onno CP Schayck, Irene C Kuo

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001211.pub4

2012 Sep 12

Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis

Review

Aziz Sheikh, Brian Hurwitz, Constant Paul van Schayck, Susannah McLean, Ulugbek Nurmatov

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001211.pub3

2006 Apr 19

Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis

Review

Aziz Sheikh, Brian Hurwitz

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001211.pub2

2000 Jan 24

Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis

Review

Aziz A Sheikh, Brian Hurwitz, James Cave

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001211

Differences between protocol and review

In previous versions of the review we have not separated primary and secondary outcomes of interest. In this updated review we have divided all outcome measures into two: primary and secondary outcomes.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.