Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

بررسی تاثیر استفاده زودهنگام (< 7 روز) از کورتیکواستروئیدهای سیستمیک پس از زایمان برای پیشگیری از بروز دیسپلازی برونکوپولمونری در نوزادان نارس

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001146.pub6Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 21 octubre 2021see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Neonatología

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2022 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Lex W Doyle

    Correspondencia a: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    [email protected]

    Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia

    Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    Newborn Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia

  • Jeanie L Cheong

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia

    Newborn Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia

  • Susanne Hay

    Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

  • Brett J Manley

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    Newborn Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia

  • Henry L Halliday

    Retired Honorary Professor of Child Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK

  • Roger Soll

    Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, USA

Contributions of authors

Lex Doyle collated data on long‐term neurosensory outcomes. For earlier reviews, he assisted Henry Halliday, Richard Ehrenkranz, and Jeanie Cheong in identifying relevant studies, synthesising data, and writing some of the earlier versions of the review. He identified new studies for the current review.

Jeanie Cheong identified studies for the previous version of the review and has assisted in identifying studies in the most recent literature search, synthesising data, and writing the current version of this review.

Susanne Hay has assisted in identifying studies in the most recent literature search, double‐checking and synthesising data, and writing the current version of this review.

Brett Manley has assisted in identifying studies in the most recent literature search, double‐checking and synthesising data, and writing the current version of this review.

Henry Halliday identified all studies, synthesised data, wrote earlier versions of this review, and has assisted in identifying studies in the most recent literature search, interpreting data, and writing the current version of this review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Action Research UK, UK

    Grant to study effects of postnatal steroids

  • Action Research UK, UK

    Grant to study long‐term follow‐up

External sources

  • National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia

    Various project grants and Centre for Research Excellence (1153176)

  • Vermont Oxford Network, USA

    Cochrane Neonatal Reviews are produced with support from Vermont Oxford Network, a worldwide collaboration of health professionals dedicated to providing evidence‐based care of the highest quality for newborn infants and their families

Declarations of interest

Jeanie Cheong received a Career Development Fellowship, for salary support, from the Australian Medical Research Future Fund.

Lex Doyle's institution received grant funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia.

Henry Halliday declared no conflicts of interest.

Susanne Hay was the PI on a network meta‐analysis of systemic corticosteroids for bronchopulmonary dysplasia, for which her institution received a grant from the Deborah Munroe Noonan Memorial Research Fund. She works as a neonatologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

Brett Manley's institution received funding for a Career Development Fellowship from the Australian Medical Research Future Fund. His institution also received project grant funding from the NHMRC of Australia. He has published articles and review articles on the topic of postnatal steroids in peer‐reviewed journals, and has commented on social media. He works as a Consultant Neonatologist at The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the contribution of Richard Ehrenkranz (deceased) to earlier versions of this review.

We would like to thank Cochrane Neonatal: Colleen Ovelman, (former) Managing Editor; Jane Cracknell, Managing Editor; Michelle Fiander, Information Specialist; Roger Soll, Co‐coordinating Editor; and Bill McGuire, Co‐coordinating Editor; who provided editorial and administrative support.

Carol Friesen, (former) Information Specialist, designed and ran literature searches for the 2020 update, and Colleen Ovelman peer‐reviewed the OVID MEDLINE search strategy.

Sarah Hodgkinson, Bob Boyle, Roger Soll, and Vibhuti Shah peer‐reviewed and offered feedback on this updated review. 

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Oct 21

Early (< 7 days) systemic postnatal corticosteroids for prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants

Review

Lex W Doyle, Jeanie L Cheong, Susanne Hay, Brett J Manley, Henry L Halliday, Roger Soll

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001146.pub6

2017 Oct 24

Early (< 8 days) systemic postnatal corticosteroids for prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants

Review

Lex W Doyle, Jeanie L Cheong, Richard A Ehrenkranz, Henry L Halliday

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001146.pub5

2014 May 13

Early (< 8 days) postnatal corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in preterm infants

Review

Lex W Doyle, Richard A Ehrenkranz, Henry L Halliday

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001146.pub4

2010 Jan 20

Early (< 8 days) postnatal corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in preterm infants

Review

Henry L Halliday, Richard A Ehrenkranz, Lex W Doyle

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001146.pub3

2009 Jan 21

Early (< 8 days) postnatal corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in preterm infants

Review

Henry L Halliday, Richard A Ehrenkranz, Lex W Doyle

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001146.pub2

2003 Jan 20

Early postnatal (<96 hours) corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in preterm infants

Review

Henry L Halliday, Richard A Ehrenkranz, L W Doyle, LEX W DOYLE

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001146

Differences between protocol and review

  • We added the methods and plan for 'Summary of findings' tables and GRADE recommendations, which were not included in the original protocol (Halliday 2000), nor in earlier versions of this review (Doyle 2014a; Halliday 2003; Halliday 2009; Halliday 2010). For the 2017 update (Doyle 2017a), we changed the title to "Early (< 8 days) systemic postnatal corticosteroids for prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants". For the 2021 update, we changed the title further to "Early (< 7 days) systemic postnatal corticosteroids for prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants"; because two trials started treatment with systemic corticosteroids on Day 7 after birth, they were included in the "late" review

  • As of July 2019, Cochrane Neonatal no longer searches Embase for its reviews. RCTs and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) from Embase are added to the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in the Cochrane Library, via a robust process (see How CENTRAL is created). Cochrane Neonatal has validated its searches to ensure that relevant Embase records are found while searching CENTRAL (Ovelman 2020).

  • Also starting in July 2019, Cochrane Neonatal no longer searches for RCTs and CCTs on the following platforms: ClinicalTrials.gov or World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), as records from both platforms are added to CENTRAL on a monthly basis (see How CENTRAL is created). Comprehensive search strategies are executed in CENTRAL to retrieve relevant records. The ISRCTN Registry (at www.isrctn.com/; formerly Controlled‐trials.com) is searched separately

  • Starting in September 2020, Cochrane Neonatal no longer searches for RCTs and quasi‐RCTs from the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), as records are identified and added to CENTRAL on a monthly basis through Cochrane's Centralised Search Service project (see How CENTRAL is created at https://www.cochranelibrary.com/central/central-creation#CINAHL%20section)

  • For the 2020 update, we ran searches in the following databases: CENTRAL via CRS Web and MEDLINE via OVID. Search strategies are available in Appendix 1. Previous search methods are available in Appendix 2 and Appendix 3

  • Because the indication for early hydrocortisone treatment might be primarily to treat lung problems or low blood pressure, we performed for the 2021 review a sensitivity analysis by indication for hydrocortisone for major outcomes of mortality at latest age, BPD at 36 weeks, and mortality or BPD at 36 weeks

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram: review update.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram: review update.

Risk of bias table.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias table.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Mortality, outcome: 1.4 Mortality at latest reported age.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Mortality, outcome: 1.4 Mortality at latest reported age.

Funnel plot of comparison: 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), outcome: 2.2 BPD (36 weeks' postmenstrual age).

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Funnel plot of comparison: 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), outcome: 2.2 BPD (36 weeks' postmenstrual age).

Funnel plot of comparison: 3 Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), outcome: 3.2 Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Funnel plot of comparison: 3 Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), outcome: 3.2 Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age.

Funnel plot of comparison: 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, outcome: 5.15 Gastrointestinal perforation.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 7

Funnel plot of comparison: 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, outcome: 5.15 Gastrointestinal perforation.

Funnel plot of comparison: 6 Long‐term follow‐up, outcome: 6.11 Cerebral palsy.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 8

Funnel plot of comparison: 6 Long‐term follow‐up, outcome: 6.11 Cerebral palsy.

Funnel plot of comparison: 6 Long‐term follow‐up, outcome: 6.13 Death or cerebral palsy.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 9

Funnel plot of comparison: 6 Long‐term follow‐up, outcome: 6.13 Death or cerebral palsy.

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 1: Neonatal mortality (up to 28 days)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 1: Neonatal mortality (up to 28 days)

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 2: Mortality at 36 weeks

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 2: Mortality at 36 weeks

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 3: Mortality to hospital discharge

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 3: Mortality to hospital discharge

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 4: Mortality at latest reported age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 4: Mortality at latest reported age

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 1: BPD (28 days of life)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 1: BPD (28 days of life)

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 2: BPD (36 weeks' postmenstrual age)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 2: BPD (36 weeks' postmenstrual age)

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 3: BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age in survivors to 36 weeks

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 3: BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age in survivors to 36 weeks

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 4: Late rescue with corticosteroids

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 4: Late rescue with corticosteroids

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 5: Survivors who had late rescue with corticosteroids

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 5: Survivors who had late rescue with corticosteroids

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 6: Survivors discharged home on oxygen

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 6: Survivors discharged home on oxygen

Comparison 3: Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 1: Death or BPD at 28 days of life

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3: Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 1: Death or BPD at 28 days of life

Comparison 3: Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 2: Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3: Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 2: Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 1: Failure to extubate by third day

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 1: Failure to extubate by third day

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 2: Failure to extubate by seventh day

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 2: Failure to extubate by seventh day

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 3: Failure to extubate by 14th day

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 3: Failure to extubate by 14th day

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 4: Failure to extubate by 28th day

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 4: Failure to extubate by 28th day

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 1: Infection

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 1: Infection

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 2: Hyperglycaemia

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 2: Hyperglycaemia

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 3: Hypertension

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 3: Hypertension

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 4: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 4: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 5: Growth failure

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 5: Growth failure

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 6: Pulmonary air leak

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 6: Pulmonary air leak

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 7: Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.7

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 7: Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA)

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 8: Severe IVH

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.8

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 8: Severe IVH

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 9: Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) in infants examined

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.9

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 9: Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) in infants examined

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 10: Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.10

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 10: Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL)

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 11: PVL in infants with cranial ultrasound scans

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.11

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 11: PVL in infants with cranial ultrasound scans

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 12: PVL in survivors seen at follow‐up

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.12

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 12: PVL in survivors seen at follow‐up

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 13: Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.13

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 13: Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC)

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 14: Gastrointestinal bleeding

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.14

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 14: Gastrointestinal bleeding

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 15: Gastrointestinal perforation

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.15

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 15: Gastrointestinal perforation

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 16: Pulmonary haemorrhage

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.16

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 16: Pulmonary haemorrhage

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 17: Any retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.17

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 17: Any retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 18: Severe ROP

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.18

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 18: Severe ROP

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 19: Severe ROP in survivors

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.19

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 19: Severe ROP in survivors

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 1: Bayley Mental Developmental Index (MDI) < ‐2 SD

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 1: Bayley Mental Developmental Index (MDI) < ‐2 SD

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 2: Bayley MDI < ‐2 SD in tested survivors

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 2: Bayley MDI < ‐2 SD in tested survivors

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 3: Bayley Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) < ‐2 SD

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 3: Bayley Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) < ‐2 SD

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 4: Bayley PDI < ‐2 SD in tested survivors

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 4: Bayley PDI < ‐2 SD in tested survivors

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 5: Developmental delay (other criteria)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.5

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 5: Developmental delay (other criteria)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 6: Developmental delay (other criteria) in tested survivors

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.6

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 6: Developmental delay (other criteria) in tested survivors

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 7: Blindness

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.7

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 7: Blindness

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 8: Blindness in survivors assessed

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.8

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 8: Blindness in survivors assessed

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 9: Deafness

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.9

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 9: Deafness

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 10: Deafness in survivors assessed

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.10

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 10: Deafness in survivors assessed

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 11: Cerebral palsy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.11

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 11: Cerebral palsy

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 12: Death before follow‐up in trials assessing cerebral palsy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.12

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 12: Death before follow‐up in trials assessing cerebral palsy

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 13: Death or cerebral palsy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.13

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 13: Death or cerebral palsy

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 14: Cerebral palsy in survivors assessed

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.14

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 14: Cerebral palsy in survivors assessed

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 15: Major neurosensory disability (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.15

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 15: Major neurosensory disability (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 16: Death before follow‐up in trials assessing major neurosensory disability (variable criteria)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.16

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 16: Death before follow‐up in trials assessing major neurosensory disability (variable criteria)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 17: Death or major neurosensory disability (variable criteria)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.17

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 17: Death or major neurosensory disability (variable criteria)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 18: Major neurosensory disability in survivors examined (variable criteria)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.18

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 18: Major neurosensory disability in survivors examined (variable criteria)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 19: Abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.19

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 19: Abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 20: Death before follow‐up in trials assessing abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.20

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 20: Death before follow‐up in trials assessing abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 21: Death or abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.21

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 21: Death or abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 22: Abnormal neurological exam in tested survivors (variable criteria)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.22

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 22: Abnormal neurological exam in tested survivors (variable criteria)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 23: Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.23

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 23: Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 24: Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70) in survivors assessed

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.24

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 24: Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70) in survivors assessed

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 25: "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.25

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 25: "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 26: "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness ‐ in survivors assessed

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.26

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 26: "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness ‐ in survivors assessed

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 27: Behaviour abnormalities

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.27

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 27: Behaviour abnormalities

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 28: Behaviour abnormalities in 3‐year‐old survivors assessed

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.28

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 28: Behaviour abnormalities in 3‐year‐old survivors assessed

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 29: Abnormal EEG

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.29

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 29: Abnormal EEG

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 30: Abnormal EEG in tested survivors

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.30

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 30: Abnormal EEG in tested survivors

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 31: Re‐hospitalisation in infancy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.31

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 31: Re‐hospitalisation in infancy

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 32: Re‐hospitalisation in infancy in survivors

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.32

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 32: Re‐hospitalisation in infancy in survivors

Comparison 7: Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone, Outcome 1: Mortality to latest age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7: Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone, Outcome 1: Mortality to latest age

Comparison 7: Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone, Outcome 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7: Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone, Outcome 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks

Comparison 7: Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone, Outcome 3: Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.3

Comparison 7: Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone, Outcome 3: Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks

Summary of findings 1. Early systemic postnatal corticosteroids compared with placebo or no treatment for preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants

Early systemic postnatal corticosteroids (dexamethasone and hydrocortisone) compared with placebo or no treatment for preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants

Patient or population: preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants
Setting: multiple neonatal intensive care units, most from high‐income countries
Intervention: early systemic postnatal corticosteroids
Comparison: placebo or no treatment

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo or no treatment

Risk with early systemic postnatal corticosteroids

Mortality at latest reported age

 

Study population (studies treating with dexamethasone or hydrocortisone)

RR 0.95
(0.85 to 1.06)

4373
(31 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

P = 0.05 for subgroup differences

232 per 1000

221 per 1000
(197 to 246)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with dexamethasone)

RR 1.02
(0.90 to 1.16)

2940
(20 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

236 per 1000

241 per 1000

(212 to 274)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with hydrocortisone)

RR 0.80
(0.65 to 0.99)

1433
(11 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

225 per 1000

180 per 1000
(146 to 222)

BPD (36 weeks' PMA)

 

Study population (studies treating with dexamethasone or hydrocortisone)

RR 0.80
(0.73 to 0.88)

4167
(26 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATEa

important

P = 0.01 for subgroup differences

308 per 1000

247 per 1000
(225 to 271)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with dexamethasone)

RR 0.72
(0.63 to 0.82)

2791
(17 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

important

269 per 1000

194 per 1000
(170 to 221)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with hydrocortisone)

RR 0.92
(0.81 to 1.06)

1376
(9 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

important

385 per 1000

354 per 1000
(312 to 408)

Mortality or BPD at 36 weeks' PMA

 

Study population (studies treating with dexamethasone or hydrocortisone)

RR 0.89
(0.84 to 0.94)

4167
(26 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

515 per 1000

458 per 1000
(432 to 484)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with dexamethasone)

RR 0.88
(0.81 to 0.95

2791
(17 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

487 per 1000

429 per 1000
(395 to 463)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with hydrocortisone)

RR 0.90
(0.82 to 0.99

1376
(9 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

569 per 1000

512 per 1000
(467 to 563)

Gastrointestinal perforation during primary hospitalisation

 

Study population (studies treating with dexamethasone or hydrocortisone)

RR 1.84
(1.36 to 2.49)

3040
(16 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

important

39 per 1000

71 per 1000
(53 to 96)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with dexamethasone)

RR 1.73
(1.20 to 2.51

1936
(9 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

important

41 per 1000

71 per 1000
(50 to 104)

Study population (subgroup of infants treated with hydrocortisone

RR 2.05
(1.21 to 3.47

1104
(7 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

important

34 per 1000

70 per 1000
(41 to 118)

Cerebral palsy at latest reported age

 

Study population (studies treating with dexamethasone or hydrocortisone)

RR 1.42
(1.06 to 1.91)

1973
(13 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

P = 0.09 for subgroup differences

74 per 1000

106 per 1000
(79 to 142)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with dexamethasone)

RR 1.77
(1.21 to 2.58)

921
(7 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

89 per 1000

158 per 1000
(108 to 230)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with hydrocortisone)

RR 1.05
(0.66 to 1.66)

1052
(6 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

62 per 1000

65 per 1000
(41 to 103)

Mortality or cerebral palsy at latest reported age

 

Study population (studies treating with dexamethasone or hydrocortisone)

RR 1.03
(0.91 to 1.16)

1973
(13 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

P = 0.02 for subgroup differences

335 per 1000

345 per 1000
(305 to 389)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with dexamethasone)

RR 1.18
(1.01 to 1.37)

921
(7 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

 

383 per 1000

452 per 1000
(387 to 525)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with hydrocortisone)

RR 0.86
(0.71 to 1.05)

1052
(6 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

295 per 1000

254 per 1000
(210 to 310)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

BPD: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; CI: confidence interval; PMA: postmenstrual age; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.

High certainty: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

Moderate certainty: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

Low certainty: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

Very low certainty: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

aDowngraded one level for serious study limitations owing to evidence of publication bias for studies overall, but not within subgroups.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 1. Early systemic postnatal corticosteroids compared with placebo or no treatment for preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants
Comparison 1. Mortality at different ages

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Neonatal mortality (up to 28 days) Show forest plot

20

2933

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.87, 1.18]

1.1.1 Dexamethasone

16

2576

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.90, 1.23]

1.1.2 Hydrocortisone

4

357

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.49, 1.21]

1.2 Mortality at 36 weeks Show forest plot

27

4176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.90, 1.13]

1.2.1 Dexamethasone

17

2791

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.94, 1.23]

1.2.2 Hydrocortisone

10

1385

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.67, 1.06]

1.3 Mortality to hospital discharge Show forest plot

29

4164

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.85, 1.07]

1.3.1 Dexamethasone

18

2731

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.90, 1.19]

1.3.2 Hydrocortisone

11

1433

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.65, 0.99]

1.4 Mortality at latest reported age Show forest plot

31

4373

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.85, 1.06]

1.4.1 Dexamethasone

20

2940

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.90, 1.16]

1.4.2 Hydrocortisone

11

1433

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.65, 0.99]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Mortality at different ages
Comparison 2. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

2.1 BPD (28 days of life) Show forest plot

15

2580

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.80, 0.93]

2.1.1 Dexamethasone

14

2327

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.78, 0.91]

2.1.2 Hydrocortisone

1

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.85, 1.18]

2.2 BPD (36 weeks' postmenstrual age) Show forest plot

26

4167

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.73, 0.88]

2.2.1 Dexamethasone

17

2791

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.63, 0.82]

2.2.2 Hydrocortisone

9

1376

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.81, 1.06]

2.3 BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age in survivors to 36 weeks Show forest plot

24

3093

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.72, 0.87]

2.3.1 Dexamethasone

15

1948

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.63, 0.82]

2.3.2 Hydrocortisone

9

1145

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.78, 1.02]

2.4 Late rescue with corticosteroids Show forest plot

15

3004

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.73, 0.86]

2.4.1 Dexamethasone

10

1974

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.65, 0.80]

2.4.2 Hydrocortisone

5

1030

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.81, 1.09]

2.5 Survivors who had late rescue with corticosteroids Show forest plot

7

895

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.67, 0.89]

2.5.1 Dexamethasone

6

853

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.68, 0.91]

2.5.2 Hydrocortisone

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.24, 0.98]

2.6 Survivors discharged home on oxygen Show forest plot

9

1442

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.70, 1.07]

2.6.1 Dexamethasone

3

406

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.48, 1.26]

2.6.2 Hydrocortisone

6

1036

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.70, 1.13]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages
Comparison 3. Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

3.1 Death or BPD at 28 days of life Show forest plot

14

2471

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.87, 0.96]

3.1.1 Dexamethasone

13

2218

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.86, 0.95]

3.1.2 Hydrocortisone

1

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.90, 1.12]

3.2 Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age Show forest plot

26

4167

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.83, 0.94]

3.2.1 Dexamethasone

17

2791

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.81, 0.95]

3.2.2 Hydrocortisone

9

1376

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.82, 0.99]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages
Comparison 4. Failure to extubate at different ages

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

4.1 Failure to extubate by third day Show forest plot

4

887

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.75, 0.95]

4.1.1 Dexamethasone

3

381

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.62, 0.86]

4.1.2 Hydrocortisone

1

506

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.82, 1.14]

4.2 Failure to extubate by seventh day Show forest plot

8

1448

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.68, 0.85]

4.2.1 Dexamethasone

6

703

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.61, 0.84]

4.2.2 Hydrocortisone

2

745

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.69, 0.94]

4.3 Failure to extubate by 14th day Show forest plot

4

443

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.62, 0.97]

4.4 Failure to extubate by 28th day Show forest plot

7

902

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.72, 0.98]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Failure to extubate at different ages
Comparison 5. Complications during primary hospitalisation

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

5.1 Infection Show forest plot

25

4101

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.96, 1.15]

5.1.1 Dexamethasone

18

2821

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.91, 1.15]

5.1.2 Hydrocortisone

7

1280

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.94, 1.25]

5.2 Hyperglycaemia Show forest plot

14

2688

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.26 [1.15, 1.37]

5.2.1 Dexamethasone

12

2117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.35 [1.21, 1.49]

5.2.2 Hydrocortisone

2

571

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.84, 1.22]

5.3 Hypertension Show forest plot

11

1993

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.85 [1.54, 2.22]

5.3.1 Dexamethasone

10

1943

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.84 [1.53, 2.21]

5.3.2 Hydrocortisone

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.00 [0.33, 26.92]

5.4 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Show forest plot

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.33 [1.40, 13.37]

5.5 Growth failure Show forest plot

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.67 [2.27, 19.62]

5.6 Pulmonary air leak Show forest plot

17

3276

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.73, 1.11]

5.6.1 Dexamethasone

12

2041

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.66, 1.08]

5.6.2 Hydrocortisone

5

1235

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.72, 1.56]

5.7 Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) Show forest plot

24

4013

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.72, 0.85]

5.7.1 Dexamethasone

17

2706

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.69, 0.84]

5.7.2 Hydrocortisone

7

1307

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.71, 0.95]

5.8 Severe IVH Show forest plot

26

4103

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.84, 1.12]

5.8.1 Dexamethasone

17

2736

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.81, 1.14]

5.8.2 Hydrocortisone

9

1367

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.76, 1.27]

5.9 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) in infants examined Show forest plot

8

1964

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.75, 1.12]

5.9.1 Dexamethasone

4

994

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.59, 1.03]

5.9.2 Hydrocortisone

4

970

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.82, 1.49]

5.10 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) Show forest plot

15

2807

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.83, 1.53]

5.10.1 Dexamethasone

8

1514

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [0.84, 1.81]

5.10.2 Hydrocortisone

7

1293

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.58, 1.59]

5.11 PVL in infants with cranial ultrasound scans Show forest plot

7

1841

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.79, 1.60]

5.12 PVL in survivors seen at follow‐up Show forest plot

2

183

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.60, 2.48]

5.13 Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) Show forest plot

25

4050

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.74, 1.11]

5.13.1 Dexamethasone

15

2661

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.69, 1.13]

5.13.2 Hydrocortisone

10

1389

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.66, 1.37]

5.14 Gastrointestinal bleeding Show forest plot

12

1816

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.86 [1.35, 2.55]

5.14.1 Dexamethasone

10

1725

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.87 [1.35, 2.58]

5.14.2 Hydrocortisone

2

91

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.53 [0.27, 8.74]

5.15 Gastrointestinal perforation Show forest plot

16

3040

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.84 [1.36, 2.49]

5.15.1 Dexamethasone

9

1936

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.73 [1.20, 2.51]

5.15.2 Hydrocortisone

7

1104

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.05 [1.21, 3.47]

5.16 Pulmonary haemorrhage Show forest plot

10

1820

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.87, 1.54]

5.16.1 Dexamethasone

7

686

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.65, 1.45]

5.16.2 Hydrocortisone

3

1134

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.36 [0.92, 2.03]

5.17 Any retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) Show forest plot

9

1345

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.80, 0.97]

5.17.1 Dexamethasone

8

1042

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.72, 0.99]

5.17.2 Hydrocortisone

1

303

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.84, 1.04]

5.18 Severe ROP Show forest plot

14

2577

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.67, 0.99]

5.18.1 Dexamethasone

8

1507

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.60, 0.99]

5.18.2 Hydrocortisone

6

1070

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.65, 1.23]

5.19 Severe ROP in survivors Show forest plot

12

1575

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.64, 0.94]

5.19.1 Dexamethasone

10

1238

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.59, 0.95]

5.19.2 Hydrocortisone

2

337

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.60, 1.17]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Complications during primary hospitalisation
Comparison 6. Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

6.1 Bayley Mental Developmental Index (MDI) < ‐2 SD Show forest plot

3

842

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.78, 1.29]

6.2 Bayley MDI < ‐2 SD in tested survivors Show forest plot

3

528

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.79, 1.25]

6.3 Bayley Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) < ‐2 SD Show forest plot

3

842

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.85, 1.60]

6.4 Bayley PDI < ‐2 SD in tested survivors Show forest plot

3

528

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.87, 1.57]

6.5 Developmental delay (other criteria) Show forest plot

2

769

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.93, 2.03]

6.5.1 Dexamethasone

1

248

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.68 [1.08, 2.61]

6.5.2 Hydrocortisone

1

521

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.26, 1.69]

6.6 Developmental delay (other criteria) in tested survivors Show forest plot

2

538

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.50 [1.05, 2.15]

6.6.1 Dexamethasone

1

159

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.94 [1.30, 2.88]

6.6.2 Hydrocortisone

1

379

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.24, 1.53]

6.7 Blindness Show forest plot

9

1318

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.01 [0.74, 5.50]

6.7.1 Dexamethasone

6

862

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.01 [0.74, 5.50]

6.7.2 Hydrocortisone

3

456

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Not estimable

6.8 Blindness in survivors assessed Show forest plot

9

964

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.16 [0.80, 5.86]

6.8.1 Dexamethasone

6

532

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.16 [0.80, 5.86]

6.8.2 Hydrocortisone

3

432

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Not estimable

6.9 Deafness Show forest plot

9

1100

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.39, 3.37]

6.9.1 Dexamethasone

5

600

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.30, 3.14]

6.9.2 Hydrocortisone

4

500

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.12 [0.13, 73.06]

6.10 Deafness in survivors assessed Show forest plot

8

476

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.40, 3.29]

6.11 Cerebral palsy Show forest plot

13

1973

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.43 [1.07, 1.92]

6.11.1 Dexamethasone

7

921

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.77 [1.21, 2.58]

6.11.2 Hydrocortisone

6

1052

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.66, 1.66]

6.12 Death before follow‐up in trials assessing cerebral palsy Show forest plot

13

1973

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.78, 1.05]

6.12.1 Dexamethasone

7

921

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.81, 1.21]

6.12.2 Hydrocortisone

6

1052

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.64, 1.02]

6.13 Death or cerebral palsy Show forest plot

13

1973

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.91, 1.16]

6.13.1 Dexamethasone

7

921

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [1.01, 1.37]

6.13.2 Hydrocortisone

6

1052

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.71, 1.05]

6.14 Cerebral palsy in survivors assessed Show forest plot

13

1329

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.47 [1.12, 1.92]

6.14.1 Dexamethasone

7

587

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.85 [1.31, 2.61]

6.14.2 Hydrocortisone

6

742

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.65, 1.58]

6.15 Major neurosensory disability (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies) Show forest plot

7

1703

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.89, 1.33]

6.15.1 Dexamethasone

4

772

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [1.03, 1.83]

6.15.2 Hydrocortisone

3

931

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.64, 1.14]

6.16 Death before follow‐up in trials assessing major neurosensory disability (variable criteria) Show forest plot

8

1754

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.77, 1.06]

6.16.1 Dexamethasone

4

772

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.82, 1.25]

6.16.2 Hydrocortisone

4

982

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.62, 1.01]

6.17 Death or major neurosensory disability (variable criteria) Show forest plot

7

1703

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.87, 1.08]

6.17.1 Dexamethasone

4

772

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.99, 1.30]

6.17.2 Hydrocortisone

3

931

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.69, 0.97]

6.18 Major neurosensory disability in survivors examined (variable criteria) Show forest plot

8

1178

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.89, 1.28]

6.18.1 Dexamethasone

4

469

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.36 [1.05, 1.77]

6.18.2 Hydrocortisone

4

709

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.65, 1.10]

6.19 Abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies) Show forest plot

5

829

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.81 [1.33, 2.47]

6.20 Death before follow‐up in trials assessing abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria) Show forest plot

6

1350

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.75, 1.07]

6.20.1 Dexamethasone

5

829

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.79, 1.21]

6.20.2 Hydrocortisone

1

521

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.54, 1.04]

6.21 Death or abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria) Show forest plot

5

829

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [1.06, 1.42]

6.22 Abnormal neurological exam in tested survivors (variable criteria) Show forest plot

5

508

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.89 [1.41, 2.52]

6.23 Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70) Show forest plot

3

125

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.46 [0.64, 3.33]

6.23.1 Dexamethasone

2

90

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.57, 3.31]

6.23.2 Hydrocortisone

1

35

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.12 [0.21, 21.27]

6.24 Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70) in survivors assessed Show forest plot

2

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.47, 2.65]

6.25 "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness Show forest plot

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.16, 2.25]

6.26 "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness ‐ in survivors assessed Show forest plot

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.16, 2.12]

6.27 Behaviour abnormalities Show forest plot

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.16, 2.25]

6.28 Behaviour abnormalities in 3‐year‐old survivors assessed Show forest plot

1

46

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.16, 2.22]

6.29 Abnormal EEG Show forest plot

2

306

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.66, 2.33]

6.30 Abnormal EEG in tested survivors Show forest plot

2

146

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.61, 2.08]

6.31 Re‐hospitalisation in infancy Show forest plot

3

672

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.68, 1.08]

6.32 Re‐hospitalisation in infancy in survivors Show forest plot

3

430

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.71, 1.07]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood
Comparison 7. Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

7.1 Mortality to latest age Show forest plot

11

1433

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.65, 0.99]

7.1.1 Lung

7

1319

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.66, 1.01]

7.1.2 Blood pressure

4

114

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.24, 1.38]

7.2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks Show forest plot

9

1152

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.80, 1.02]

7.2.1 Lung

6

1058

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.79, 1.02]

7.2.2 Blood pressure

3

94

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.66, 1.54]

7.3 Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks Show forest plot

7

1297

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.80, 0.98]

7.3.1 Lung

6

1275

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.81, 0.99]

7.3.2 Blood pressure

1

22

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.19, 1.02]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone