Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

بررسی تاثیر استفاده زودهنگام (< 7 روز) از کورتیکواستروئیدهای سیستمیک پس از زایمان برای پیشگیری از بروز دیسپلازی برونکوپولمونری در نوزادان نارس

Appendices

Appendix 1. 2020 search methods

The RCT filters have been created using Cochrane's highly sensitive search strategies for identifying randomised trials (Higgins 2020). The neonatal filters were created and tested by the Cochrane Neonatal Information Specialist.

CENTRAL via CRS Web

Date ranges: 01 January 2016 to 25 September 2020
Terms:
1 MESH DESCRIPTOR Adrenal Cortex Hormones EXPLODE ALL AND CENTRAL:TARGET
2 MESH DESCRIPTOR Steroids EXPLODE ALL AND CENTRAL:TARGET
3 MESH DESCRIPTOR Glucocorticoids EXPLODE ALL AND CENTRAL:TARGET
4 adrenal cortex hormone* OR dexamethasone OR betamethasone OR hydrocortisone OR steroid OR steroids OR corticosteroid* OR prednisolone OR methylprednisolone OR glucocorticoid* AND CENTRAL:TARGET
5 #1 OR #2 OR #3 OR #4
6 MESH DESCRIPTOR Infant, Newborn EXPLODE ALL AND CENTRAL:TARGET
7 infant or infants or infant's or "infant s" or infantile or infancy or newborn* or "new born" or "new borns" or "newly born" or neonat* or baby* or babies or premature or prematures or prematurity or preterm or preterms or "pre term" or premies or "low birth weight" or "low birthweight" or VLBW or LBW or ELBW or NICU AND CENTRAL:TARGET
8 #7 OR #6 AND CENTRAL:TARGET
9 #5 AND #8
10 2016 TO 2020:YR AND CENTRAL:TARGET
11 #10 AND #9

MEDLINE via OVID

Date ranges: 01 January 2016 to 25 September 2020
Terms:
1. exp Adrenal Cortex Hormones/
2. exp Steroids/
3. exp Glucocorticoids/
4. (adrenal cortex hormone* or dexamethasone or betamethasone or hydrocortisone or steroid or steroids or corticosteroid* or prednisolone or methylprednisolone or glucocorticoid*).mp.
5. 1 or 2 or 3 or 4
6. exp infant, newborn/
7. (newborn* or new born or new borns or newly born or baby* or babies or premature or prematurity or preterm or pre term or low birth weight or low birthweight or VLBW or LBW or infant or infants or 'infant s' or infant's or infantile or infancy or neonat*).ti,ab.
8. 6 or 7
9. randomized controlled trial.pt.
10. controlled clinical trial.pt.
11. randomized.ab.
12. placebo.ab.
13. drug therapy.fs.
14. randomly.ab.
15. trial.ab.
16. groups.ab.
17. or/9‐16
18. exp animals/ not humans.sh.
19. 17 not 18
20. 8 and 19
21. randomi?ed.ti,ab.
22. randomly.ti,ab.
23. trial.ti,ab.
24. groups.ti,ab.
25. ((single or doubl* or tripl* or treb*) and (blind* or mask*)).ti,ab.
26. placebo*.ti,ab.
27. 21 or 22 or 23 or 24 or 25 or 26
28. 7 and 27
29. limit 28 to yr="2019 ‐Current"
30. 20 or 29
31. 5 and 30
32. limit 31 to yr="2016 ‐Current"

ISRCTN

Date ranges: 2016 to 2020
Terms:
corticosteroid* within Participant age range: Neonate
"Adrenal Cortex Hormones AND ( Participant age range: Neonate )"
"Glucocorticoid* AND ( Participant age range: Neonate )"
Steroids within Participant age range: Neonate

Appendix 2. 2017 search methods

We used the criteria and standard methods of Cochrane and Cochrane Neonatal.

We conducted a comprehensive search that included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 1), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE via PubMed (January 2013 to 21 February 2017); Embase (January 2013 to 21 February 2017); and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (January 2013 to 21 February 2017), using the following search terms: (adrenal cortex hormones OR dexamethasone OR betamethasone OR hydrocortisone OR steroid OR corticosteroid), plus database‐specific limiters for RCTs and neonates (see below for full search strategies for each database). We did not apply language restrictions.

We searched clinical trials registries for ongoing or recently completed trials (clinicaltrials.gov; World Health Organization International Trial Registry and Platform (www.whoint/ictrp/search/en/); the ISRCTN Registry).

PubMed: ((infant, newborn[MeSH] OR newborn OR neonate OR neonatal OR premature OR low birth weight OR VLBW OR LBW or infan* or neonat*) AND (randomized controlled trial [pt] OR controlled clinical trial [pt] OR randomized [tiab] OR placebo [tiab] OR drug therapy [sh] OR randomly [tiab] OR trial [tiab] OR groups [tiab]) NOT (animals [mh] NOT humans [mh]))

Embase: (infant, newborn or newborn or neonate or neonatal or premature or very low birth weight or low birth weight or VLBW or LBW or Newborn or infan* or neonat*) AND (human not animal) AND (randomized controlled trial or controlled clinical trial or randomized or placebo or clinical trials as topic or randomly or trial or clinical trial)

CINAHL: (infant, newborn OR newborn OR neonate OR neonatal OR premature OR low birth weight OR VLBW OR LBW or Newborn or infan* or neonat*) AND (randomized controlled trial OR controlled clinical trial OR randomized OR placebo OR clinical trials as topic OR randomly OR trial OR PT clinical trial)

The Cochrane Library: (infant or newborn or neonate or neonatal or premature or preterm or very low birth weight or low birth weight or VLBW or LBW)

Appendix 3. 2013 search methods

For previous versions of this review, we sought randomised controlled trials of postnatal corticosteroid therapy from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2013, Issue 8), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE (1966 to August 2013); handsearching of paediatric and perinatal journals; and examination of previous review articles and information received from practising neonatologists. We searched MEDLINE using the terms: adrenal cortex hormones or dexamethasone or betamethasone or hydrocortisone or steroids or corticosteroids, limits randomised controlled trials, human, all infant: birth to 23 months. We contacted the authors of all studies, when possible, to confirm details of reported follow‐up studies, or to obtain any information about long‐term follow‐up when none had been reported.

Appendix 4. Risk of bias tool

Sequence generation (checking for possible selection bias). Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

For each included study, we categorised the method used to generate the allocation sequence as:

  • low risk (any truly random process, e.g. random number table; computer random number generator);

  • high risk (any non‐random process, e.g. odd or even date of birth; hospital or clinic record number); or

  • unclear risk.

Allocation concealment (checking for possible selection bias). Was allocation adequately concealed?

For each included study, we categorised the method used to conceal the allocation sequence as:

  • low risk (e.g. telephone or central randomisation; consecutively numbered sealed opaque envelopes);

  • high risk (open random allocation; unsealed or non‐opaque envelopes, alternation; date of birth); or

  • unclear risk.

Blinding of participants and personnel (checking for possible performance bias). Was knowledge of the allocated intervention adequately prevented during the study?

For each included study, we categorised the methods used to blind study participants and personnel from knowledge of which intervention a participant received. We assessed blinding separately for different outcomes or classes of outcomes. We categorised methods as:

  • low risk, high risk, or unclear risk for participants; and

  • low risk, high risk, or unclear risk for personnel.

Blinding of outcome assessment (checking for possible detection bias). Was knowledge of the allocated intervention adequately prevented at the time of outcome assessment?

For each included study, we categorised the methods used to blind outcome assessment. We assessed blinding separately for different outcomes or classes of outcomes. We categorised the methods as:

  • low risk for outcome assessors;

  • high risk for outcome assessors; or

  • unclear risk for outcome assessors.

Incomplete outcome data (checking for possible attrition bias through withdrawals, dropouts, protocol deviations). Were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed?

For each included study and for each outcome, we described the completeness of data including attrition and exclusions from the analysis. We noted whether attrition and exclusions were reported, numbers included in the analysis at each stage (compared with total randomised participants), reasons for attrition or exclusion when reported, and whether missing data were balanced across groups or were related to outcomes. When trial authors reported or supplied sufficient information, we re‐included missing data in the analyses. We categorised methods as:

  • low risk (< 20% missing data);

  • high risk (≥ 20% missing data); or

  • unclear risk.

Selective reporting bias. Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

For each included study, we described how we investigated the possibility of selective outcome reporting bias and what we found. We assessed methods as:

  • low risk (when it is clear that all of the study's prespecified outcomes and all expected outcomes of interest to the review have been reported);

  • high risk (when not all of the study's prespecified outcomes have been reported; one or more reported primary outcomes were not prespecified outcomes of interest and are reported incompletely and so cannot be used; study fails to include results of a key outcome that would have been expected to have been reported); or

  • unclear risk.

Other sources of bias. Was the study apparently free of other problems that could put it at high risk of bias?

For each included study, we described any important concerns we had about other possible sources of bias (e.g. whether there was a potential source of bias related to the specific study design, whether the trial was stopped early owing to some data‐dependent process). We assessed whether each study was free of other problems that could put it at risk of bias as:

  • low risk;

  • high risk; or

  • unclear risk.

If needed, we explored the impact of the level of bias by undertaking sensitivity analyses.

Study flow diagram: review update.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram: review update.

Risk of bias table.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias table.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Mortality, outcome: 1.4 Mortality at latest reported age.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Mortality, outcome: 1.4 Mortality at latest reported age.

Funnel plot of comparison: 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), outcome: 2.2 BPD (36 weeks' postmenstrual age).

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Funnel plot of comparison: 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), outcome: 2.2 BPD (36 weeks' postmenstrual age).

Funnel plot of comparison: 3 Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), outcome: 3.2 Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Funnel plot of comparison: 3 Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), outcome: 3.2 Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age.

Funnel plot of comparison: 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, outcome: 5.15 Gastrointestinal perforation.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 7

Funnel plot of comparison: 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, outcome: 5.15 Gastrointestinal perforation.

Funnel plot of comparison: 6 Long‐term follow‐up, outcome: 6.11 Cerebral palsy.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 8

Funnel plot of comparison: 6 Long‐term follow‐up, outcome: 6.11 Cerebral palsy.

Funnel plot of comparison: 6 Long‐term follow‐up, outcome: 6.13 Death or cerebral palsy.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 9

Funnel plot of comparison: 6 Long‐term follow‐up, outcome: 6.13 Death or cerebral palsy.

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 1: Neonatal mortality (up to 28 days)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 1: Neonatal mortality (up to 28 days)

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 2: Mortality at 36 weeks

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 2: Mortality at 36 weeks

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 3: Mortality to hospital discharge

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 3: Mortality to hospital discharge

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 4: Mortality at latest reported age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1: Mortality at different ages, Outcome 4: Mortality at latest reported age

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 1: BPD (28 days of life)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 1: BPD (28 days of life)

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 2: BPD (36 weeks' postmenstrual age)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 2: BPD (36 weeks' postmenstrual age)

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 3: BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age in survivors to 36 weeks

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 3: BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age in survivors to 36 weeks

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 4: Late rescue with corticosteroids

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 4: Late rescue with corticosteroids

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 5: Survivors who had late rescue with corticosteroids

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 5: Survivors who had late rescue with corticosteroids

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 6: Survivors discharged home on oxygen

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 6: Survivors discharged home on oxygen

Comparison 3: Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 1: Death or BPD at 28 days of life

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3: Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 1: Death or BPD at 28 days of life

Comparison 3: Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 2: Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3: Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages, Outcome 2: Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 1: Failure to extubate by third day

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 1: Failure to extubate by third day

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 2: Failure to extubate by seventh day

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 2: Failure to extubate by seventh day

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 3: Failure to extubate by 14th day

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 3: Failure to extubate by 14th day

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 4: Failure to extubate by 28th day

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4: Failure to extubate at different ages, Outcome 4: Failure to extubate by 28th day

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 1: Infection

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 1: Infection

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 2: Hyperglycaemia

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 2: Hyperglycaemia

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 3: Hypertension

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 3: Hypertension

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 4: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 4: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 5: Growth failure

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 5: Growth failure

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 6: Pulmonary air leak

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 6: Pulmonary air leak

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 7: Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.7

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 7: Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA)

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 8: Severe IVH

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.8

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 8: Severe IVH

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 9: Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) in infants examined

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.9

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 9: Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) in infants examined

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 10: Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.10

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 10: Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL)

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 11: PVL in infants with cranial ultrasound scans

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.11

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 11: PVL in infants with cranial ultrasound scans

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 12: PVL in survivors seen at follow‐up

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.12

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 12: PVL in survivors seen at follow‐up

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 13: Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.13

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 13: Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC)

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 14: Gastrointestinal bleeding

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.14

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 14: Gastrointestinal bleeding

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 15: Gastrointestinal perforation

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.15

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 15: Gastrointestinal perforation

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 16: Pulmonary haemorrhage

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.16

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 16: Pulmonary haemorrhage

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 17: Any retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.17

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 17: Any retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 18: Severe ROP

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.18

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 18: Severe ROP

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 19: Severe ROP in survivors

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.19

Comparison 5: Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 19: Severe ROP in survivors

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 1: Bayley Mental Developmental Index (MDI) < ‐2 SD

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 1: Bayley Mental Developmental Index (MDI) < ‐2 SD

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 2: Bayley MDI < ‐2 SD in tested survivors

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 2: Bayley MDI < ‐2 SD in tested survivors

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 3: Bayley Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) < ‐2 SD

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 3: Bayley Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) < ‐2 SD

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 4: Bayley PDI < ‐2 SD in tested survivors

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 4: Bayley PDI < ‐2 SD in tested survivors

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 5: Developmental delay (other criteria)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.5

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 5: Developmental delay (other criteria)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 6: Developmental delay (other criteria) in tested survivors

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.6

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 6: Developmental delay (other criteria) in tested survivors

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 7: Blindness

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.7

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 7: Blindness

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 8: Blindness in survivors assessed

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.8

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 8: Blindness in survivors assessed

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 9: Deafness

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.9

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 9: Deafness

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 10: Deafness in survivors assessed

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.10

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 10: Deafness in survivors assessed

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 11: Cerebral palsy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.11

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 11: Cerebral palsy

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 12: Death before follow‐up in trials assessing cerebral palsy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.12

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 12: Death before follow‐up in trials assessing cerebral palsy

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 13: Death or cerebral palsy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.13

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 13: Death or cerebral palsy

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 14: Cerebral palsy in survivors assessed

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.14

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 14: Cerebral palsy in survivors assessed

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 15: Major neurosensory disability (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.15

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 15: Major neurosensory disability (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 16: Death before follow‐up in trials assessing major neurosensory disability (variable criteria)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.16

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 16: Death before follow‐up in trials assessing major neurosensory disability (variable criteria)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 17: Death or major neurosensory disability (variable criteria)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.17

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 17: Death or major neurosensory disability (variable criteria)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 18: Major neurosensory disability in survivors examined (variable criteria)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.18

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 18: Major neurosensory disability in survivors examined (variable criteria)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 19: Abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.19

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 19: Abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 20: Death before follow‐up in trials assessing abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.20

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 20: Death before follow‐up in trials assessing abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 21: Death or abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.21

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 21: Death or abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 22: Abnormal neurological exam in tested survivors (variable criteria)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.22

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 22: Abnormal neurological exam in tested survivors (variable criteria)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 23: Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.23

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 23: Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70)

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 24: Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70) in survivors assessed

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.24

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 24: Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70) in survivors assessed

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 25: "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.25

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 25: "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 26: "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness ‐ in survivors assessed

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.26

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 26: "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness ‐ in survivors assessed

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 27: Behaviour abnormalities

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.27

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 27: Behaviour abnormalities

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 28: Behaviour abnormalities in 3‐year‐old survivors assessed

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.28

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 28: Behaviour abnormalities in 3‐year‐old survivors assessed

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 29: Abnormal EEG

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.29

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 29: Abnormal EEG

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 30: Abnormal EEG in tested survivors

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.30

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 30: Abnormal EEG in tested survivors

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 31: Re‐hospitalisation in infancy

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.31

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 31: Re‐hospitalisation in infancy

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 32: Re‐hospitalisation in infancy in survivors

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.32

Comparison 6: Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood, Outcome 32: Re‐hospitalisation in infancy in survivors

Comparison 7: Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone, Outcome 1: Mortality to latest age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7: Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone, Outcome 1: Mortality to latest age

Comparison 7: Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone, Outcome 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7: Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone, Outcome 2: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks

Comparison 7: Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone, Outcome 3: Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.3

Comparison 7: Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone, Outcome 3: Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks

Summary of findings 1. Early systemic postnatal corticosteroids compared with placebo or no treatment for preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants

Early systemic postnatal corticosteroids (dexamethasone and hydrocortisone) compared with placebo or no treatment for preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants

Patient or population: preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants
Setting: multiple neonatal intensive care units, most from high‐income countries
Intervention: early systemic postnatal corticosteroids
Comparison: placebo or no treatment

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo or no treatment

Risk with early systemic postnatal corticosteroids

Mortality at latest reported age

 

Study population (studies treating with dexamethasone or hydrocortisone)

RR 0.95
(0.85 to 1.06)

4373
(31 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

P = 0.05 for subgroup differences

232 per 1000

221 per 1000
(197 to 246)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with dexamethasone)

RR 1.02
(0.90 to 1.16)

2940
(20 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

236 per 1000

241 per 1000

(212 to 274)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with hydrocortisone)

RR 0.80
(0.65 to 0.99)

1433
(11 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

225 per 1000

180 per 1000
(146 to 222)

BPD (36 weeks' PMA)

 

Study population (studies treating with dexamethasone or hydrocortisone)

RR 0.80
(0.73 to 0.88)

4167
(26 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATEa

important

P = 0.01 for subgroup differences

308 per 1000

247 per 1000
(225 to 271)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with dexamethasone)

RR 0.72
(0.63 to 0.82)

2791
(17 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

important

269 per 1000

194 per 1000
(170 to 221)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with hydrocortisone)

RR 0.92
(0.81 to 1.06)

1376
(9 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

important

385 per 1000

354 per 1000
(312 to 408)

Mortality or BPD at 36 weeks' PMA

 

Study population (studies treating with dexamethasone or hydrocortisone)

RR 0.89
(0.84 to 0.94)

4167
(26 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

515 per 1000

458 per 1000
(432 to 484)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with dexamethasone)

RR 0.88
(0.81 to 0.95

2791
(17 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

487 per 1000

429 per 1000
(395 to 463)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with hydrocortisone)

RR 0.90
(0.82 to 0.99

1376
(9 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

569 per 1000

512 per 1000
(467 to 563)

Gastrointestinal perforation during primary hospitalisation

 

Study population (studies treating with dexamethasone or hydrocortisone)

RR 1.84
(1.36 to 2.49)

3040
(16 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

important

39 per 1000

71 per 1000
(53 to 96)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with dexamethasone)

RR 1.73
(1.20 to 2.51

1936
(9 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

important

41 per 1000

71 per 1000
(50 to 104)

Study population (subgroup of infants treated with hydrocortisone

RR 2.05
(1.21 to 3.47

1104
(7 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

important

34 per 1000

70 per 1000
(41 to 118)

Cerebral palsy at latest reported age

 

Study population (studies treating with dexamethasone or hydrocortisone)

RR 1.42
(1.06 to 1.91)

1973
(13 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

P = 0.09 for subgroup differences

74 per 1000

106 per 1000
(79 to 142)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with dexamethasone)

RR 1.77
(1.21 to 2.58)

921
(7 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

89 per 1000

158 per 1000
(108 to 230)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with hydrocortisone)

RR 1.05
(0.66 to 1.66)

1052
(6 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

62 per 1000

65 per 1000
(41 to 103)

Mortality or cerebral palsy at latest reported age

 

Study population (studies treating with dexamethasone or hydrocortisone)

RR 1.03
(0.91 to 1.16)

1973
(13 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

P = 0.02 for subgroup differences

335 per 1000

345 per 1000
(305 to 389)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with dexamethasone)

RR 1.18
(1.01 to 1.37)

921
(7 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

 

383 per 1000

452 per 1000
(387 to 525)

Study population (subgroup of studies treating with hydrocortisone)

RR 0.86
(0.71 to 1.05)

1052
(6 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

critical

295 per 1000

254 per 1000
(210 to 310)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

BPD: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; CI: confidence interval; PMA: postmenstrual age; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.

High certainty: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

Moderate certainty: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

Low certainty: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

Very low certainty: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

aDowngraded one level for serious study limitations owing to evidence of publication bias for studies overall, but not within subgroups.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 1. Early systemic postnatal corticosteroids compared with placebo or no treatment for preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants
Comparison 1. Mortality at different ages

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Neonatal mortality (up to 28 days) Show forest plot

20

2933

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.87, 1.18]

1.1.1 Dexamethasone

16

2576

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.90, 1.23]

1.1.2 Hydrocortisone

4

357

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.49, 1.21]

1.2 Mortality at 36 weeks Show forest plot

27

4176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.90, 1.13]

1.2.1 Dexamethasone

17

2791

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.94, 1.23]

1.2.2 Hydrocortisone

10

1385

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.67, 1.06]

1.3 Mortality to hospital discharge Show forest plot

29

4164

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.85, 1.07]

1.3.1 Dexamethasone

18

2731

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.90, 1.19]

1.3.2 Hydrocortisone

11

1433

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.65, 0.99]

1.4 Mortality at latest reported age Show forest plot

31

4373

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.85, 1.06]

1.4.1 Dexamethasone

20

2940

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.90, 1.16]

1.4.2 Hydrocortisone

11

1433

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.65, 0.99]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Mortality at different ages
Comparison 2. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

2.1 BPD (28 days of life) Show forest plot

15

2580

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.80, 0.93]

2.1.1 Dexamethasone

14

2327

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.78, 0.91]

2.1.2 Hydrocortisone

1

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.85, 1.18]

2.2 BPD (36 weeks' postmenstrual age) Show forest plot

26

4167

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.73, 0.88]

2.2.1 Dexamethasone

17

2791

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.63, 0.82]

2.2.2 Hydrocortisone

9

1376

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.81, 1.06]

2.3 BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age in survivors to 36 weeks Show forest plot

24

3093

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.72, 0.87]

2.3.1 Dexamethasone

15

1948

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.63, 0.82]

2.3.2 Hydrocortisone

9

1145

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.78, 1.02]

2.4 Late rescue with corticosteroids Show forest plot

15

3004

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.73, 0.86]

2.4.1 Dexamethasone

10

1974

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.65, 0.80]

2.4.2 Hydrocortisone

5

1030

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.81, 1.09]

2.5 Survivors who had late rescue with corticosteroids Show forest plot

7

895

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.67, 0.89]

2.5.1 Dexamethasone

6

853

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.68, 0.91]

2.5.2 Hydrocortisone

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.24, 0.98]

2.6 Survivors discharged home on oxygen Show forest plot

9

1442

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.70, 1.07]

2.6.1 Dexamethasone

3

406

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.48, 1.26]

2.6.2 Hydrocortisone

6

1036

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.70, 1.13]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages
Comparison 3. Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

3.1 Death or BPD at 28 days of life Show forest plot

14

2471

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.87, 0.96]

3.1.1 Dexamethasone

13

2218

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.86, 0.95]

3.1.2 Hydrocortisone

1

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.90, 1.12]

3.2 Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age Show forest plot

26

4167

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.83, 0.94]

3.2.1 Dexamethasone

17

2791

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.81, 0.95]

3.2.2 Hydrocortisone

9

1376

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.82, 0.99]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at different ages
Comparison 4. Failure to extubate at different ages

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

4.1 Failure to extubate by third day Show forest plot

4

887

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.75, 0.95]

4.1.1 Dexamethasone

3

381

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.62, 0.86]

4.1.2 Hydrocortisone

1

506

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.82, 1.14]

4.2 Failure to extubate by seventh day Show forest plot

8

1448

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.68, 0.85]

4.2.1 Dexamethasone

6

703

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.61, 0.84]

4.2.2 Hydrocortisone

2

745

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.69, 0.94]

4.3 Failure to extubate by 14th day Show forest plot

4

443

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.62, 0.97]

4.4 Failure to extubate by 28th day Show forest plot

7

902

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.72, 0.98]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Failure to extubate at different ages
Comparison 5. Complications during primary hospitalisation

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

5.1 Infection Show forest plot

25

4101

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.96, 1.15]

5.1.1 Dexamethasone

18

2821

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.91, 1.15]

5.1.2 Hydrocortisone

7

1280

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.94, 1.25]

5.2 Hyperglycaemia Show forest plot

14

2688

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.26 [1.15, 1.37]

5.2.1 Dexamethasone

12

2117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.35 [1.21, 1.49]

5.2.2 Hydrocortisone

2

571

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.84, 1.22]

5.3 Hypertension Show forest plot

11

1993

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.85 [1.54, 2.22]

5.3.1 Dexamethasone

10

1943

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.84 [1.53, 2.21]

5.3.2 Hydrocortisone

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.00 [0.33, 26.92]

5.4 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Show forest plot

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.33 [1.40, 13.37]

5.5 Growth failure Show forest plot

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.67 [2.27, 19.62]

5.6 Pulmonary air leak Show forest plot

17

3276

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.73, 1.11]

5.6.1 Dexamethasone

12

2041

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.66, 1.08]

5.6.2 Hydrocortisone

5

1235

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.72, 1.56]

5.7 Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) Show forest plot

24

4013

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.72, 0.85]

5.7.1 Dexamethasone

17

2706

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.69, 0.84]

5.7.2 Hydrocortisone

7

1307

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.71, 0.95]

5.8 Severe IVH Show forest plot

26

4103

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.84, 1.12]

5.8.1 Dexamethasone

17

2736

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.81, 1.14]

5.8.2 Hydrocortisone

9

1367

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.76, 1.27]

5.9 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) in infants examined Show forest plot

8

1964

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.75, 1.12]

5.9.1 Dexamethasone

4

994

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.59, 1.03]

5.9.2 Hydrocortisone

4

970

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.82, 1.49]

5.10 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) Show forest plot

15

2807

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.83, 1.53]

5.10.1 Dexamethasone

8

1514

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [0.84, 1.81]

5.10.2 Hydrocortisone

7

1293

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.58, 1.59]

5.11 PVL in infants with cranial ultrasound scans Show forest plot

7

1841

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.79, 1.60]

5.12 PVL in survivors seen at follow‐up Show forest plot

2

183

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.60, 2.48]

5.13 Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) Show forest plot

25

4050

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.74, 1.11]

5.13.1 Dexamethasone

15

2661

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.69, 1.13]

5.13.2 Hydrocortisone

10

1389

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.66, 1.37]

5.14 Gastrointestinal bleeding Show forest plot

12

1816

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.86 [1.35, 2.55]

5.14.1 Dexamethasone

10

1725

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.87 [1.35, 2.58]

5.14.2 Hydrocortisone

2

91

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.53 [0.27, 8.74]

5.15 Gastrointestinal perforation Show forest plot

16

3040

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.84 [1.36, 2.49]

5.15.1 Dexamethasone

9

1936

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.73 [1.20, 2.51]

5.15.2 Hydrocortisone

7

1104

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.05 [1.21, 3.47]

5.16 Pulmonary haemorrhage Show forest plot

10

1820

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.87, 1.54]

5.16.1 Dexamethasone

7

686

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.65, 1.45]

5.16.2 Hydrocortisone

3

1134

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.36 [0.92, 2.03]

5.17 Any retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) Show forest plot

9

1345

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.80, 0.97]

5.17.1 Dexamethasone

8

1042

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.72, 0.99]

5.17.2 Hydrocortisone

1

303

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.84, 1.04]

5.18 Severe ROP Show forest plot

14

2577

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.67, 0.99]

5.18.1 Dexamethasone

8

1507

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.60, 0.99]

5.18.2 Hydrocortisone

6

1070

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.65, 1.23]

5.19 Severe ROP in survivors Show forest plot

12

1575

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.64, 0.94]

5.19.1 Dexamethasone

10

1238

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.59, 0.95]

5.19.2 Hydrocortisone

2

337

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.60, 1.17]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Complications during primary hospitalisation
Comparison 6. Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

6.1 Bayley Mental Developmental Index (MDI) < ‐2 SD Show forest plot

3

842

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.78, 1.29]

6.2 Bayley MDI < ‐2 SD in tested survivors Show forest plot

3

528

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.79, 1.25]

6.3 Bayley Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) < ‐2 SD Show forest plot

3

842

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.85, 1.60]

6.4 Bayley PDI < ‐2 SD in tested survivors Show forest plot

3

528

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.87, 1.57]

6.5 Developmental delay (other criteria) Show forest plot

2

769

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.93, 2.03]

6.5.1 Dexamethasone

1

248

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.68 [1.08, 2.61]

6.5.2 Hydrocortisone

1

521

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.26, 1.69]

6.6 Developmental delay (other criteria) in tested survivors Show forest plot

2

538

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.50 [1.05, 2.15]

6.6.1 Dexamethasone

1

159

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.94 [1.30, 2.88]

6.6.2 Hydrocortisone

1

379

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.24, 1.53]

6.7 Blindness Show forest plot

9

1318

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.01 [0.74, 5.50]

6.7.1 Dexamethasone

6

862

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.01 [0.74, 5.50]

6.7.2 Hydrocortisone

3

456

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Not estimable

6.8 Blindness in survivors assessed Show forest plot

9

964

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.16 [0.80, 5.86]

6.8.1 Dexamethasone

6

532

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.16 [0.80, 5.86]

6.8.2 Hydrocortisone

3

432

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Not estimable

6.9 Deafness Show forest plot

9

1100

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.39, 3.37]

6.9.1 Dexamethasone

5

600

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.30, 3.14]

6.9.2 Hydrocortisone

4

500

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.12 [0.13, 73.06]

6.10 Deafness in survivors assessed Show forest plot

8

476

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.40, 3.29]

6.11 Cerebral palsy Show forest plot

13

1973

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.43 [1.07, 1.92]

6.11.1 Dexamethasone

7

921

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.77 [1.21, 2.58]

6.11.2 Hydrocortisone

6

1052

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.66, 1.66]

6.12 Death before follow‐up in trials assessing cerebral palsy Show forest plot

13

1973

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.78, 1.05]

6.12.1 Dexamethasone

7

921

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.81, 1.21]

6.12.2 Hydrocortisone

6

1052

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.64, 1.02]

6.13 Death or cerebral palsy Show forest plot

13

1973

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.91, 1.16]

6.13.1 Dexamethasone

7

921

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [1.01, 1.37]

6.13.2 Hydrocortisone

6

1052

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.71, 1.05]

6.14 Cerebral palsy in survivors assessed Show forest plot

13

1329

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.47 [1.12, 1.92]

6.14.1 Dexamethasone

7

587

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.85 [1.31, 2.61]

6.14.2 Hydrocortisone

6

742

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.65, 1.58]

6.15 Major neurosensory disability (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies) Show forest plot

7

1703

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.89, 1.33]

6.15.1 Dexamethasone

4

772

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [1.03, 1.83]

6.15.2 Hydrocortisone

3

931

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.64, 1.14]

6.16 Death before follow‐up in trials assessing major neurosensory disability (variable criteria) Show forest plot

8

1754

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.77, 1.06]

6.16.1 Dexamethasone

4

772

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.82, 1.25]

6.16.2 Hydrocortisone

4

982

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.62, 1.01]

6.17 Death or major neurosensory disability (variable criteria) Show forest plot

7

1703

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.87, 1.08]

6.17.1 Dexamethasone

4

772

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.99, 1.30]

6.17.2 Hydrocortisone

3

931

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.69, 0.97]

6.18 Major neurosensory disability in survivors examined (variable criteria) Show forest plot

8

1178

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.89, 1.28]

6.18.1 Dexamethasone

4

469

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.36 [1.05, 1.77]

6.18.2 Hydrocortisone

4

709

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.65, 1.10]

6.19 Abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies) Show forest plot

5

829

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.81 [1.33, 2.47]

6.20 Death before follow‐up in trials assessing abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria) Show forest plot

6

1350

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.75, 1.07]

6.20.1 Dexamethasone

5

829

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.79, 1.21]

6.20.2 Hydrocortisone

1

521

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.54, 1.04]

6.21 Death or abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria) Show forest plot

5

829

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [1.06, 1.42]

6.22 Abnormal neurological exam in tested survivors (variable criteria) Show forest plot

5

508

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.89 [1.41, 2.52]

6.23 Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70) Show forest plot

3

125

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.46 [0.64, 3.33]

6.23.1 Dexamethasone

2

90

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.57, 3.31]

6.23.2 Hydrocortisone

1

35

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.12 [0.21, 21.27]

6.24 Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70) in survivors assessed Show forest plot

2

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.47, 2.65]

6.25 "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness Show forest plot

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.16, 2.25]

6.26 "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness ‐ in survivors assessed Show forest plot

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.16, 2.12]

6.27 Behaviour abnormalities Show forest plot

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.16, 2.25]

6.28 Behaviour abnormalities in 3‐year‐old survivors assessed Show forest plot

1

46

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.16, 2.22]

6.29 Abnormal EEG Show forest plot

2

306

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.66, 2.33]

6.30 Abnormal EEG in tested survivors Show forest plot

2

146

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.61, 2.08]

6.31 Re‐hospitalisation in infancy Show forest plot

3

672

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.68, 1.08]

6.32 Re‐hospitalisation in infancy in survivors Show forest plot

3

430

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.71, 1.07]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Long‐term follow‐up into later childhood
Comparison 7. Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

7.1 Mortality to latest age Show forest plot

11

1433

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.65, 0.99]

7.1.1 Lung

7

1319

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.66, 1.01]

7.1.2 Blood pressure

4

114

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.24, 1.38]

7.2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks Show forest plot

9

1152

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.80, 1.02]

7.2.1 Lung

6

1058

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.79, 1.02]

7.2.2 Blood pressure

3

94

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.66, 1.54]

7.3 Mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks Show forest plot

7

1297

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.80, 0.98]

7.3.1 Lung

6

1275

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.81, 0.99]

7.3.2 Blood pressure

1

22

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.19, 1.02]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. Sensitivity analyses by indication for hydrocortisone