Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Administración posnatal temprana (< 8 días) de corticosteroides sistémicos para la prevención de la displasia broncopulmonar en lactantes prematuros

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001146.pub5Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 24 octubre 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Neonatología

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Lex W Doyle

    Correspondencia a: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Jeanie L Cheong

    Newborn Research Centre and Neonatal Services, The Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

  • Richard A Ehrenkranz

    Department of Pediatrics, Yale University, New Haven, USA

  • Henry L Halliday

    Retired Honorary Professor of Child Health, Queen's University, Belfast, UK

Contributions of authors

Lex Doyle collated data concerning long‐term neurosensory outcomes; he assisted Henry Halliday and Richard Ehrenkranz in identifying all studies, synthesising the data, and writing earlier versions of this review. Richard Ehrenkranz assisted Henry Halliday in identifying all studies, synthesising the data, and writing earlier versions of this review. Henry Halliday identified all studies, synthesised the data, and wrote earlier versions of this review. Jeanie Cheong assisted Lex Doyle in identifying all studies in the most recent literature search, synthesising the data, and writing the current version of this review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Action Research UK Grant to study effects of postnatal steroids, UK.

  • Action Research UK Grant to study long‐term follow‐up, UK.

External sources

  • National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia.

Declarations of interest

Lex Doyle was Chief Investigator in the DART study, a randomised controlled trial of low‐dose, short‐course dexamethasone in ventilator‐dependent infants that was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

Henry Halliday (HLH) is a retired neonatologist. He is joint Editor‐in‐Chief of the journal Neonatology and sits on many Data Monitoring and Trial Steering Committees for various neonatal/perinatal trials. He has received support in the past for co‐ordinating the OSECT study (2000), for which AstraZeneca (Sweden) supplied metered‐dose inhalers of budesonide and placebo. HLH also acts as a consultant for Chiesi Farmiceutici (Italy), a company that sells two neonatal drugs ‐ Curosurf (a surfactant to treat respiratory distress syndrome) and Peyona (a caffeine preparation to treat apnoea of prematurity).

Acknowledgements

None noted.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Oct 21

Early (< 7 days) systemic postnatal corticosteroids for prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants

Review

Lex W Doyle, Jeanie L Cheong, Susanne Hay, Brett J Manley, Henry L Halliday, Roger Soll

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001146.pub6

2017 Oct 24

Early (< 8 days) systemic postnatal corticosteroids for prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants

Review

Lex W Doyle, Jeanie L Cheong, Richard A Ehrenkranz, Henry L Halliday

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001146.pub5

2014 May 13

Early (< 8 days) postnatal corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in preterm infants

Review

Lex W Doyle, Richard A Ehrenkranz, Henry L Halliday

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001146.pub4

2010 Jan 20

Early (< 8 days) postnatal corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in preterm infants

Review

Henry L Halliday, Richard A Ehrenkranz, Lex W Doyle

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001146.pub3

2009 Jan 21

Early (< 8 days) postnatal corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in preterm infants

Review

Henry L Halliday, Richard A Ehrenkranz, Lex W Doyle

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001146.pub2

2003 Jan 20

Early postnatal (<96 hours) corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in preterm infants

Review

Henry L Halliday, Richard A Ehrenkranz, L W Doyle, LEX W DOYLE

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001146

Differences between protocol and review

We added the methods and plan for 'Summary of findings' tables and GRADE recommendations, which were not included in the original protocol nor in the last version of this review. For the 2017 update, we changed the title to "Early (< 8 days) systemic postnatal corticosteroids for prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants."

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram: review update.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram: review update.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Mortality, outcome: 1.4 Mortality at latest reported age.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Mortality, outcome: 1.4 Mortality at latest reported age.

Funnel plot of comparison: 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), outcome: 2.2 BPD (36 weeks' postmenstrual age).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Funnel plot of comparison: 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), outcome: 2.2 BPD (36 weeks' postmenstrual age).

Funnel plot of comparison: 3 Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), outcome: 3.2 Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Funnel plot of comparison: 3 Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), outcome: 3.2 Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age.

Funnel plot of comparison: 6 Long‐term follow‐up, outcome: 6.11 Cerebral palsy.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Funnel plot of comparison: 6 Long‐term follow‐up, outcome: 6.11 Cerebral palsy.

Comparison 1 Mortality, Outcome 1 Neonatal mortality (up to 28 days).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Mortality, Outcome 1 Neonatal mortality (up to 28 days).

Comparison 1 Mortality, Outcome 2 Mortality at 36 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Mortality, Outcome 2 Mortality at 36 weeks.

Comparison 1 Mortality, Outcome 3 Mortality to hospital discharge.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Mortality, Outcome 3 Mortality to hospital discharge.

Comparison 1 Mortality, Outcome 4 Mortality at latest reported age.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Mortality, Outcome 4 Mortality at latest reported age.

Comparison 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 1 BPD (28 days of life).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 1 BPD (28 days of life).

Comparison 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 2 BPD (36 weeks' postmenstrual age).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 2 BPD (36 weeks' postmenstrual age).

Comparison 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 3 BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age in survivors.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 3 BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age in survivors.

Comparison 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 4 Late rescue with corticosteroids.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 4 Late rescue with corticosteroids.

Comparison 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 5 Survivors who had late rescue with corticosteroids.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 5 Survivors who had late rescue with corticosteroids.

Comparison 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 6 Survivors discharged home on oxygen.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 6 Survivors discharged home on oxygen.

Comparison 3 Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 1 Death or BPD at 28 days of life.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 1 Death or BPD at 28 days of life.

Comparison 3 Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 2 Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Outcome 2 Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age.

Comparison 4 Failure to extubate, Outcome 1 Failure to extubate by third day.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Failure to extubate, Outcome 1 Failure to extubate by third day.

Comparison 4 Failure to extubate, Outcome 2 Failure to extubate by seventh day.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Failure to extubate, Outcome 2 Failure to extubate by seventh day.

Comparison 4 Failure to extubate, Outcome 3 Failure to extubate by 14th day.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Failure to extubate, Outcome 3 Failure to extubate by 14th day.

Comparison 4 Failure to extubate, Outcome 4 Failure to extubate by 28th day.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Failure to extubate, Outcome 4 Failure to extubate by 28th day.

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 1 Infection.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 1 Infection.

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 2 Hyperglycaemia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 2 Hyperglycaemia.

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 3 Hypertension.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 3 Hypertension.

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 4 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 4 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 5 Growth failure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 5 Growth failure.

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 6 Pulmonary air leak.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 6 Pulmonary air leak.

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 7 Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.7

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 7 Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA).

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 8 Severe IVH.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.8

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 8 Severe IVH.

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 9 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) in infants examined.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.9

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 9 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) in infants examined.

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 10 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.10

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 10 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 11 PVL in infants with cranial ultrasound scans.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.11

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 11 PVL in infants with cranial ultrasound scans.

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 12 PVL in survivors seen at follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.12

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 12 PVL in survivors seen at follow‐up.

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 13 Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.13

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 13 Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC).

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 14 Gastrointestinal bleeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.14

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 14 Gastrointestinal bleeding.

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 15 Gastrointestinal perforation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.15

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 15 Gastrointestinal perforation.

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 16 Pulmonary haemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.16

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 16 Pulmonary haemorrhage.

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 17 Any retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.17

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 17 Any retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 18 Severe ROP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.18

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 18 Severe ROP.

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 19 Severe ROP in survivors.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.19

Comparison 5 Complications during primary hospitalisation, Outcome 19 Severe ROP in survivors.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 1 Bayley Mental Developmental Index (MDI) <‐2 SD.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 1 Bayley Mental Developmental Index (MDI) <‐2 SD.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 2 Bayley MDI <‐2 SD in tested survivors.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 2 Bayley MDI <‐2 SD in tested survivors.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 3 Bayley Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) <‐2 SD.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 3 Bayley Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) <‐2 SD.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 4 Bayley PDI <‐2 SD in tested survivors.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 4 Bayley PDI <‐2 SD in tested survivors.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 5 Developmental delay (criteria not specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.5

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 5 Developmental delay (criteria not specified).

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 6 Developmental delay (criteria not specified) in tested survivors.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.6

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 6 Developmental delay (criteria not specified) in tested survivors.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 7 Blindness.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.7

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 7 Blindness.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 8 Blindness in survivors assessed.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.8

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 8 Blindness in survivors assessed.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 9 Deafness.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.9

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 9 Deafness.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 10 Deafness in survivors assessed.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.10

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 10 Deafness in survivors assessed.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 11 Cerebral palsy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.11

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 11 Cerebral palsy.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 12 Death before follow‐up in trials assessing cerebral palsy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.12

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 12 Death before follow‐up in trials assessing cerebral palsy.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 13 Death or cerebral palsy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.13

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 13 Death or cerebral palsy.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 14 Cerebral palsy in survivors assessed.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.14

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 14 Cerebral palsy in survivors assessed.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 15 Major neurosensory disability (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.15

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 15 Major neurosensory disability (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies).

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 16 Death before follow‐up in trials assessing major neurosensory disability (variable criteria).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.16

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 16 Death before follow‐up in trials assessing major neurosensory disability (variable criteria).

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 17 Death or major neurosensory disability (variable criteria).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.17

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 17 Death or major neurosensory disability (variable criteria).

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 18 Major neurosensory disability in survivors examined (variable criteria).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.18

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 18 Major neurosensory disability in survivors examined (variable criteria).

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 19 Abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.19

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 19 Abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies).

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 20 Death before follow‐up in trials assessing abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.20

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 20 Death before follow‐up in trials assessing abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria).

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 21 Death or abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.21

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 21 Death or abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria).

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 22 Abnormal neurological exam in tested survivors (variable criteria).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.22

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 22 Abnormal neurological exam in tested survivors (variable criteria).

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 23 Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.23

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 23 Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70).

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 24 Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70) in survivors assessed.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.24

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 24 Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70) in survivors assessed.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 25 "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.25

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 25 "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 26 "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness ‐ in survivors assessed.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.26

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 26 "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness ‐ in survivors assessed.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 27 Behaviour abnormalities.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.27

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 27 Behaviour abnormalities.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 28 Behaviour abnormalities in 3‐year‐old survivors assessed.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.28

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 28 Behaviour abnormalities in 3‐year‐old survivors assessed.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 29 Abnormal EEG.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.29

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 29 Abnormal EEG.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 30 Abnormal EEG in tested survivors.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.30

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 30 Abnormal EEG in tested survivors.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 31 Rehospitalisation in infancy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.31

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 31 Rehospitalisation in infancy.

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 32 Rehospitalisation in infancy in survivors.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.32

Comparison 6 Long‐term follow‐up, Outcome 32 Rehospitalisation in infancy in survivors.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Early systemic postnatal corticosteroids compared with placebo or no treatment for preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants

Early systemic postnatal corticosteroids compared with placebo or no treatment for preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants

Patient or population: preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants
Setting: neonatal intensive care units
Intervention: early systemic postnatal corticosteroids
Comparison: placebo or no treatment

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo or no treatment

Risk with early systemic postnatal corticosteroids

Mortality at 36 weeks

Study population

RR 1.01
(0.89 to 1.14)

3733
(20 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

211 per 1000

213 per 1000
(188 to 241)

Mortality at latest reported age

Study population

RR 0.95
(0.85 to 1.06)

4373
(31 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATEa

232 per 1000

221 per 1000
(197 to 246)

BPD (36 weeks)

Study population

RR 0.79
(0.72 to 0.87)

3929
(24 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATEb

322 per 1000

254 per 1000
(232 to 280)

Death or BPD at 36 weeks

Study population

RR 0.88
(0.83 to 0.93)

3960
(25 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATEb

531 per 1000

467 per 1000
(441 to 494)

Gastrointestinal perforation

Study population

RR 1.72
(1.29 to 2.30)

3040
(16 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

43 per 1000

74 per 1000
(56 to 99)

Cerebral palsy

Study population

RR 1.42
(1.06 to 1.91)

1973
(13 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

74 per 1000

106 per 1000
(79 to 142)

Death or cerebral palsy

Study population

RR 1.03
(0.91 to 1.16)

1973
(13 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATEc

335 per 1000

345 per 1000
(305 to 389)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngraded one level for serious study limitations owing to weak evidence for publication bias, particularly for studies of hydrocortisone.

bDowngraded one level for serious study limitations owing to weak evidence for publication bias, for both dexamethasone and hydrocortisone studies.

cDowngraded one level for serious study limitations owing to moderate heterogeneity, particularly for studies of dexamethasone.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Early systemic postnatal corticosteroids compared with placebo or no treatment for preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants
Comparison 1. Mortality

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Neonatal mortality (up to 28 days) Show forest plot

19

2950

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.88, 1.19]

1.1 Dexamethasone

16

2603

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.90, 1.24]

1.2 Hydrocortisone

3

347

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.50, 1.23]

2 Mortality at 36 weeks Show forest plot

20

3733

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.89, 1.14]

2.1 Dexamethasone

14

2487

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.94, 1.25]

2.2 Hydrocortisone

6

1246

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.65, 1.06]

3 Mortality to hospital discharge Show forest plot

30

4273

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.85, 1.07]

3.1 Dexamethasone

19

2840

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.90, 1.18]

3.2 Hydrocortisone

11

1433

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.65, 0.98]

4 Mortality at latest reported age Show forest plot

31

4373

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.85, 1.06]

4.1 Dexamethasone

20

2940

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.90, 1.16]

4.2 Hydrocortisone

11

1433

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.65, 0.99]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Mortality
Comparison 2. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 BPD (28 days of life) Show forest plot

17

2874

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.81, 0.93]

1.1 Dexamethasone

16

2621

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.79, 0.92]

1.2 Hydrocortisone

1

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.85, 1.18]

2 BPD (36 weeks' postmenstrual age) Show forest plot

24

3929

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.72, 0.87]

2.1 Dexamethasone

16

2584

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.62, 0.81]

2.2 Hydrocortisone

8

1345

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.80, 1.05]

3 BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age in survivors Show forest plot

21

2970

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.74, 0.88]

3.1 Dexamethasone

14

1917

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.64, 0.83]

3.2 Hydrocortisone

7

1053

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.80, 1.03]

4 Late rescue with corticosteroids Show forest plot

14

2483

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.68, 0.82]

4.1 Dexamethasone

10

1974

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.65, 0.80]

4.2 Hydrocortisone

4

509

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.73, 1.40]

5 Survivors who had late rescue with corticosteroids Show forest plot

7

895

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.67, 0.89]

5.1 Dexamethasone

6

853

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.68, 0.91]

5.2 Hydrocortisone

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.24, 0.98]

6 Survivors discharged home on oxygen Show forest plot

6

691

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.51, 1.03]

6.1 Dexamethasone

3

406

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.48, 1.26]

6.2 Hydrocortisone

3

285

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.40, 1.11]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)
Comparison 3. Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Death or BPD at 28 days of life Show forest plot

15

2546

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.88, 0.96]

1.1 Dexamethasone

14

2293

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.86, 0.96]

1.2 Hydrocortisone

1

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.90, 1.12]

2 Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age Show forest plot

25

3960

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.83, 0.93]

2.1 Dexamethasone

16

2581

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.80, 0.94]

2.2 Hydrocortisone

9

1379

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.82, 0.99]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)
Comparison 4. Failure to extubate

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Failure to extubate by third day Show forest plot

4

887

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.75, 0.95]

1.1 Dexamethasone

3

381

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.62, 0.86]

1.2 Hydrocortisone

1

506

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.82, 1.14]

2 Failure to extubate by seventh day Show forest plot

8

1448

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.68, 0.85]

2.1 Dexamethasone

6

703

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.61, 0.84]

2.2 Hydrocortisone

2

745

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.69, 0.94]

3 Failure to extubate by 14th day Show forest plot

4

443

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.62, 0.97]

4 Failure to extubate by 28th day Show forest plot

7

902

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.72, 0.98]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Failure to extubate
Comparison 5. Complications during primary hospitalisation

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Infection Show forest plot

25

4101

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.96, 1.15]

1.1 Dexamethasone

18

2821

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.91, 1.15]

1.2 Hydrocortisone

7

1280

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.94, 1.25]

2 Hyperglycaemia Show forest plot

13

2167

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.33 [1.20, 1.47]

2.1 Dexamethasone

12

2117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.35 [1.21, 1.49]

2.2 Hydrocortisone

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.50, 1.67]

3 Hypertension Show forest plot

11

1993

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.85 [1.54, 2.22]

3.1 Dexamethasone

10

1943

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.84 [1.53, 2.21]

3.2 Hydrocortisone

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.33, 26.92]

4 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Show forest plot

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.33 [1.40, 13.37]

5 Growth failure Show forest plot

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.67 [2.27, 19.62]

6 Pulmonary air leak Show forest plot

16

3225

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.74, 1.13]

6.1 Dexamethasone

12

2041

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.66, 1.08]

6.2 Hydrocortisone

4

1184

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.75, 1.65]

7 Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) Show forest plot

24

4013

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.72, 0.85]

7.1 Dexamethasone

17

2706

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.69, 0.84]

7.2 Hydrocortisone

7

1307

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.71, 0.95]

8 Severe IVH Show forest plot

26

4103

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.83, 1.11]

8.1 Dexamethasone

17

2736

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.81, 1.14]

8.2 Hydrocortisone

9

1367

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.74, 1.23]

9 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) in infants examined Show forest plot

7

1909

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.74, 1.11]

10 Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) Show forest plot

15

2807

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.78, 1.46]

10.1 Dexamethasone

8

1514

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [0.84, 1.81]

10.2 Hydrocortisone

7

1293

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.46, 1.40]

11 PVL in infants with cranial ultrasound scans Show forest plot

7

1841

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.79, 1.60]

12 PVL in survivors seen at follow‐up Show forest plot

2

183

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.60, 2.48]

13 Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) Show forest plot

25

4050

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.74, 1.11]

13.1 Dexamethasone

15

2661

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.69, 1.13]

13.2 Hydrocortisone

10

1389

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.66, 1.37]

14 Gastrointestinal bleeding Show forest plot

12

1816

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.86 [1.35, 2.55]

14.1 Dexamethasone

10

1725

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.87 [1.35, 2.58]

14.2 Hydrocortisone

2

91

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.53 [0.27, 8.74]

15 Gastrointestinal perforation Show forest plot

16

3040

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [0.02, 0.05]

15.1 Dexamethasone

9

1936

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [0.01, 0.05]

15.2 Hydrocortisone

7

1104

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [0.00, 0.06]

16 Pulmonary haemorrhage Show forest plot

10

1820

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.87, 1.54]

16.1 Dexamethasone

7

686

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.65, 1.45]

16.2 Hydrocortisone

3

1134

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.36 [0.92, 2.03]

17 Any retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) Show forest plot

9

1345

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.80, 0.97]

17.1 Dexamethasone

8

1042

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.72, 0.99]

17.2 Hydrocortisone

1

303

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.84, 1.04]

18 Severe ROP Show forest plot

14

2577

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.66, 0.98]

18.1 Dexamethasone

8

1507

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.60, 0.99]

18.2 Hydrocortisone

6

1070

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.63, 1.21]

19 Severe ROP in survivors Show forest plot

12

1575

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.64, 0.94]

19.1 Dexamethasone

10

1238

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.59, 0.95]

19.2 Hydrocortisone

2

337

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.60, 1.17]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Complications during primary hospitalisation
Comparison 6. Long‐term follow‐up

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Bayley Mental Developmental Index (MDI) <‐2 SD Show forest plot

3

842

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.78, 1.29]

2 Bayley MDI <‐2 SD in tested survivors Show forest plot

3

528

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.79, 1.25]

3 Bayley Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) <‐2 SD Show forest plot

3

842

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.85, 1.60]

4 Bayley PDI <‐2 SD in tested survivors Show forest plot

3

528

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.87, 1.57]

5 Developmental delay (criteria not specified) Show forest plot

1

248

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.68 [1.08, 2.61]

6 Developmental delay (criteria not specified) in tested survivors Show forest plot

1

159

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.94 [1.30, 2.88]

7 Blindness Show forest plot

8

939

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.01 [0.74, 5.50]

8 Blindness in survivors assessed Show forest plot

8

585

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.16 [0.80, 5.86]

9 Deafness Show forest plot

8

721

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.39, 3.37]

10 Deafness in survivors assessed Show forest plot

8

476

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.40, 3.29]

11 Cerebral palsy Show forest plot

13

1973

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.42 [1.06, 1.91]

11.1 Dexamethasone

7

921

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.75 [1.20, 2.55]

11.2 Hydrocortisone

6

1052

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.66, 1.66]

12 Death before follow‐up in trials assessing cerebral palsy Show forest plot

13

1973

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.78, 1.05]

12.1 Dexamethasone

7

921

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.81, 1.21]

12.2 Hydrocortisone

6

1052

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.64, 1.02]

13 Death or cerebral palsy Show forest plot

13

1973

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.91, 1.16]

13.1 Dexamethasone

7

921

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [1.00, 1.37]

13.2 Hydrocortisone

6

1052

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.71, 1.05]

14 Cerebral palsy in survivors assessed Show forest plot

13

1328

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.45 [1.11, 1.90]

14.1 Dexamethasone

7

586

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.82 [1.29, 2.57]

14.2 Hydrocortisone

6

742

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.65, 1.58]

15 Major neurosensory disability (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies) Show forest plot

7

1703

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.89, 1.33]

15.1 Dexamethasone

4

772

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [1.03, 1.83]

15.2 Hydrocortisone

3

931

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.64, 1.14]

16 Death before follow‐up in trials assessing major neurosensory disability (variable criteria) Show forest plot

6

1182

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.81, 1.17]

16.1 Dexamethasone

4

772

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.82, 1.25]

16.2 Hydrocortisone

2

410

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.58, 1.28]

17 Death or major neurosensory disability (variable criteria) Show forest plot

7

1703

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.87, 1.08]

17.1 Dexamethasone

4

772

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.99, 1.30]

17.2 Hydrocortisone

3

931

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.69, 0.97]

18 Major neurosensory disability in survivors examined (variable criteria) Show forest plot

8

1178

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.89, 1.28]

18.1 Dexamethasone

4

469

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.36 [1.05, 1.77]

18.2 Hydrocortisone

4

709

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.65, 1.10]

19 Abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria ‐ see individual studies) Show forest plot

5

829

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.81 [1.33, 2.47]

20 Death before follow‐up in trials assessing abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria) Show forest plot

6

1350

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.75, 1.07]

20.1 Dexamethasone

5

829

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.79, 1.21]

20.2 Hydrocortisone

1

521

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.54, 1.04]

21 Death or abnormal neurological exam (variable criteria) Show forest plot

5

829

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [1.06, 1.42]

22 Abnormal neurological exam in tested survivors (variable criteria) Show forest plot

5

508

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.89 [1.41, 2.52]

23 Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70) Show forest plot

2

90

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.57, 3.31]

24 Intellectual impairment (IQ < 70) in survivors assessed Show forest plot

2

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.47, 2.65]

25 "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness Show forest plot

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.6 [0.16, 2.25]

26 "Major neurosensory impairment" ‐ blindness or deafness ‐ in survivors assessed Show forest plot

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.16, 2.12]

27 Behaviour abnormalities Show forest plot

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.6 [0.16, 2.25]

28 Behaviour abnormalities in 3‐year‐old survivors assessed Show forest plot

1

46

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.6 [0.16, 2.22]

29 Abnormal EEG Show forest plot

2

306

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.66, 2.33]

30 Abnormal EEG in tested survivors Show forest plot

2

146

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.61, 2.08]

31 Rehospitalisation in infancy Show forest plot

3

672

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.68, 1.08]

32 Rehospitalisation in infancy in survivors Show forest plot

3

430

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.71, 1.07]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Long‐term follow‐up