Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 julio 2009see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Judith Lumley

    Mother and Child Health Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

  • Catherine Chamberlain

    Correspondencia a: 3Centres Collaboration, Women and Children's Program, Southern Health, Clayton South, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Therese Dowswell

    Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, School of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Division of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

  • Sandy Oliver

    Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London, UK

  • Laura Oakley

    Non‐communicable Disease Epidemiology Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

  • Lyndsey Watson

    Mother and Child Health Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

Contributions of authors

Original review (1999)

Judith Lumley (JL) and Sandy Oliver (SO) conceived and designed the original review, and together with Elizabeth Waters (EW) and Laura Oakley (LO) completed data extraction and wrote the original review. JL carried out the analyses. EW was unable to contribute after 2002.

All contributed to the final text.

Update (2004)

JL coordinated the review update, extracted data, conducted the analyses and interpretation of data and wrote the review.

Catherine Chamberlain (CC) searched and screened search results, retrieved papers, extracted data, wrote to authors for additional information and entered data.

SO and LO provided general advice and contributed to the final text.

Update (2009)

JL screened retrieved papers against eligibility criteria, provided general advice on the review and contributed to the final text.

CC coordinated and secured funding for the review, undertook searches, retrieved papers, extracted data, wrote to authors for additional information, entered and analysed data, and wrote the review.

Therese Dowswell (TD) completed risk of bias assessments for trials included prior to the 2009 update and revised data abstraction records into an electronic format. TD revised the risk of bias assessments for RevMan 5 format, extracted, entered and analysed data on reduction and postpartum outcomes, and provided general advice and a methodological perspective on the review.

SO and LO extracted and analysed data on participant and provider views, provided general advice and contributed to the text of the review.

Lyn Watson (LW) provided expert statistical advice on including cluster trials, extracted data for cluster trials and adjusted the data.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • La Trobe University 1996 to date, Australia.

  • 3centres Collaboration, funded by the Victorian Department of Human Services, Australia.

    Financial support for 2008 update

External sources

  • NHS Central R & D Programme, Department of Health 1995‐1996, UK.

  • Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, Australia.

  • Department of Health, UK funding for EPI‐Centre, London University, UK.

  • Public Health Branch Victorian Department of Human Services, Australia.

  • Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, Australia.

    Financial support for 2008 update

Declarations of interest

Mother and Child Health Research (LaTrobe University), formerly Centre for the Study of Mothers' and Children's Health (Judith Lumley) receives a funding contribution from the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, which has a statutory responsibility for reducing tobacco use in the State of Victoria.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Collaborative Review Group Offices (Pregnancy and Childbirth, Tobacco Addiction) and the Australasian Cochrane centre (ACC) for assistance with the retrieval of recent relevant publications and technical support with the review. We would also like to thank staff from the Medical Library, Royal Women's Hospital and the Borchardt Library, La Trobe University (Melbourne, Victoria) for assistance with searching and providing additional references.

We are grateful to Katherine Crouch, Sally Crowe, Marilyn Fairbairn, Christine Glossop, Sarah Jones and Sue Palmer‐Simmons for their time in discussing this review from the perspectives of pregnant women in 1999.

This review update was jointly funded by the Australian Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing and the 3centres Collaboration (supported by the Victorian Department of Human Services). This financial support has been greatly appreciated and enabled completion of this update.

We thank Ewa Wisniewska for translating Polanska 2005.

As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this updated review has been commented on by two peers (an editor and referee who is external to the editorial team) and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 Feb 14

Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy

Review

Catherine Chamberlain, Alison O'Mara‐Eves, Jessie Porter, Tim Coleman, Susan M Perlen, James Thomas, Joanne E McKenzie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub5

2013 Oct 23

Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy

Review

Catherine Chamberlain, Alison O'Mara‐Eves, Sandy Oliver, Jenny R Caird, Susan M Perlen, Sandra J Eades, James Thomas

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub4

2009 Jul 08

Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy

Review

Judith Lumley, Catherine Chamberlain, Therese Dowswell, Sandy Oliver, Laura Oakley, Lyndsey Watson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub3

2004 Oct 18

Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy

Review

Judith Lumley, Sandy Oliver, Catherine Chamberlain, Laura Oakley

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub2

1999 Oct 25

Smoking cessation programs implemented during pregnancy

Review

Judith JL Lumley, S Oliver

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001055

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.