Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Buflomedil for intermittent claudication

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

Diamantopoulos 2001 {published data only}

Diamantopoulos EJ, Grigoriadou M, Ifanti G, Raptis SA. Clinical and hemorheological effects of buflomedil in diabetic subjects with intermittent claudication. International Angiology 2001;20(4):337‐44.
Diamantopoulos EJ, Raptis SA, Christodoulou‐Peters M, Moulopoulos SD. Controlled trial of buflomedil in diabetic peripheral occlusive disease. Ischaemic Diseases and the Microcirculation. New Results. International Symposium. Frankfurt, January 1989:80‐4.

Trübestein 1984 {published data only}

Trubestein G, Balzer K, Bisler H, Kluken N, Mahfoud Y, Muller‐Wiefel H, et al. Buflomedil in obstructive arterial disease: Results of a controlled trial [Buflomedil bei arterieller Verschlusskrankheit: Ergebnissse einer kontrollierten Studie]. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 1982;107(51‐52):1957‐61. [MEDLINE: 605]
Trübestein G, Balzer K, Bisler H, Klüken N, Muller‐Wiefel H, Unkel B, et al. Buflomedil in arterial occlusive disease: results of a controlled multicenter study. Angiology 1984;35(8):500‐5. [MEDLINE: 1984305153]

References to studies excluded from this review

Bisler 1983 {published data only}

Bisler H. Clinical response to buflomedil in arterial occlusive disease. Therapiewoche 1983;33:2204‐10.

Fonseca 1988 {published data only}

Fonseca V, Mikhaildis DP, Barradas MA, Jeremy JY, Gracey L, Dandona P. Double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial of buflomedil in intermittent claudication. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Research 1988;8(5):377‐81. [MEDLINE: 1989154808]

Levien 1983 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Levien. [Unpublished study] W80‐BU‐004LJL. S‐Africa, 1983. Mentioned in: Walker GA, Mac Hannaford JC. A meta‐analysis of randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled studies of the effect of buflomedil on intermittent claudication. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 1995;9(4):387‐94.

Lowe 1987 {unpublished data only}

Lowe GDO, Dandona P, Horrocks M, Cotton LT. [Unpublished study] Evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety of oral buflomedil hydrochloride in the treatment of intermittent claudication. Study QL/UK.83/2‐5. UK, 1987. Mentioned in: Walker GA, Mac Hannaford JC. A meta‐analysis of randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled studies of the effect of buflomedil on intermittent claudication. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 1995;9(4):387‐94 (Available from the authors).

Lund 1988 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Lund, et al. [Unpublished study] AB‐8603. US, 1988. Mentioned in: Walker GA, Mac Hannaford JC. A meta‐analysis of randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled studies of the effect of buflomedil on intermittent claudication. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 1995;9(4):387‐94.

Olsson 1986 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Olsson. [Unpublished study] Sweden, 1986. Mentioned in: Walker GA, Mac Hannaford JC. A meta‐analysis of randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled studies of the effect of buflomedil on intermittent claudication. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 1995;9(4):387‐94.

Raithel 1985 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Raithel, et al. [Unpublished study] BU‐3‐P05. Germany, 1985. Mentioned in: Walker GA, Mac Hannaford JC. A meta‐analysis of randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled studies of the effect of buflomedil on intermittent claudication. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 1995;9(4):387‐94.

Zinnagl 1986 {published data only}

Zinnagl N. A double blind study of the effects of buflomedil in 40 patients with arterial occlusive disease in Stage IIB [Doppelblindstudie über die Wirksamkeit von Buflomedil an 40 Patienten mit arterieller Verschlusskrankheit im Stadium IIB]. International Symposium on Conservative Therapy of Arterial Occlusive Disease. Bonn, May 23‐25. New York: Georg Thieme Verlag, 1986.

Baitsch 1983

Baitsch R. [Unpublished study]. BU‐2‐DO2. Germany, 1983. Mentioned in: Walker GA, Mac Hannaford JC. A meta‐analysis of randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled studies of the effect of buflomedil on intermittent claudication. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology1995; Vol. 9, issue 4:387‐94.

Bevan 1992

Bevan EG, Waller PC, Ramsay LE. Pharmacological approaches to the treatment of intermittent claudication. Drugs & Aging 1992;2(2):125‐36.

Cameron 1988

Cameron HA, Waller PC, Ramsay LE. Drug treatment of intermittent claudication: critical analysis of the methods and findings of published clinical trials, 1965‐1985. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1988;26(5):569‐76.

Diamantopoulos 1989

Diamantopoulos EJ, Raptis SA, Christodoulou‐Peters M, Moulopoulos SD. Controlled trial of buflomedil in diabetic peripheral occlusive disease. Ischaemic diseases and the microcirculation. New results. International Symposium. Frankfurt, January 1989:80‐4.

Dickersin 1994

Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994;309(6964):1286‐91.

Fontaine 1954

Fontaine VR, Kim M, Kieny R. Surgical treatment for peripheral vascular disease [Die chirurgische Behandlung der peripheren Durchblutungsstorungen]. Helvetica Chirurgica Acta 1954;5/6:499‐533.

Gardner 1989a

Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Estimating with confidence. In: Gardner MJ, Altman DG editor(s). Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1989:3‐5.

Gardner 1989b

Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Estimation rather than hypothesis testing: confidence intervals rather than P values. In: Gardner MJ, Altman DG editor(s). Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1989:6‐19.

Gardner 1989c

Altman DG, Gardner MJ. Calculating confidence intervals for means and their differences. In: Gardner MJ, Altman DG editor(s). Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1989:20‐7.

Gardner 1989d

Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Tables for calculation of confidence intervals. In: Gardner MJ, Altman DG editor(s). Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1989:111‐29.

Jadad 1996

Jadad RJ, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17:1‐12.

Jepson 2006

Jepson RG, Kleijnen J, Leng GC. Garlic for peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD000095. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000095.

Kleijnen 2005

Kleijnen J, Mackerras D. Vitamin E for intermittent claudication. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD000987. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000987.

Leng 2005

Leng GC, Fowler B, Ernst E. Exercise for intermittent claudication. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD000990. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000990.

Liard 1997

Liard F, Benichou AC, Gamand S, Lehert P. The effects of naftidrofuryl on quality of life. Disease Management Health Outcomes 1997;2(Suppl 1):71‐8.

Marimbert 2006

Marimbert J. Lettre aux professionnels de santé: Pharmacovigilance et la sécurité d'emploi du buflomédil [Letter to health professionals: Pharmacovigilance and safety of use of buflomedil]. Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé. 13 November 2006.

Mulrow 1999

Mulrow CD, Oxman AD. Cochrane Collaboration Handbook (In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3). Oxford: Update Software, 1999.

Price 2005

Price JF, Leng GC. Steroid sex hormones for lower limb atherosclerosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD000188. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000188.

Schulz 1995

Schulz KF, Chalmers IC, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. Journal of the American Medical Association 1995;273(5):408‐12.

Spengel 1997

Spengel A, Brown TM, Dietze S, Kirchberger I, Comte S. The claudication scale (CLAU‐S). New disease‐specific quality‐of‐life instrument in intermittent claudication. Disease Management Health Outcomes 1997;2(Suppl 1):65‐70.

Verhaeghe 1998

Verhaeghe R. Epidemiology and prognosis of peripheral obliterative arteriopathy. Drugs 1998;56(suppl 3):1‐10.

Walker 1995

Walker GA, Mac Hannaford JC. A meta‐analysis of randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled studies of the effect of buflomedil on intermittent claudication. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 1995;9(4):387‐94.

Wood 2005

Wood S. Buflomedil to reduce clinical complications of peripheral artery disease? Maybe, maybe not. www.theheart.org/article/402581.do 11 March 2005, issue accessed 26 April 2007.

Wurzinger 1987

Wurzinger LJ, Schmid‐Schonbein H. Effect of buflomedil on epinephrine‐enhanced platelet aggregation in vitro and ex vivo. Arzneimittel‐Forschung 1987;37(10):1113‐5.

References to other published versions of this review

De Backer 2000

De Backer TLM, Vander Stichele RH, Bogaert MG. Buflomedil for intermittent claudication. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD000988. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000988. [CD000988]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Diamantopoulos 2001

Methods

Study design: States randomized, double‐blinded.

Method of randomization: Not stated.

Blinding: Double‐blinded.

Dropouts: 2 patients from the buflomedil group, because they felt better, and 4 from the placebo group; 1 for no apparent reason, 1 fatal AMI, 1 underwent surgery and 1 failed to report.

Participants

Country: Greece.

Setting: Clinic.

No. 40 patients; 21 buflomedil, 19 placebo).

Gender: 36 males (19 buflomedil, 17 placebo), 4 females (2 bufomedil, 2 placebo).

Age: mean 60.1 years (range 39 to 77).

Inclusion criteria: All had maturity onset diabetes mellitus (11 insulin‐dependent,
29 non‐insulin dependent, mean duration 14 years) mean duration PAOD 3.4 years, walking distance < 400 m. SBP indices at both ankles estimated by Doppler.

At the start of a 4‐week observation period before entry into the study, patients were given a full physical examination and an ECG at rest and after exercise on a treadmill (3.6 km/h at 12.5°C).

Exclusion criteria: Vascular surgery or specific physical training, participation in another study, history of cerebrovascular accident or coronary heart disease, concomitant therapy that could influence any of the parameters to be studied, evidence of excessive Monckeberg's sclerosis, diabetic retinopathy, severe renal, hepatic or cardiopulmonary impairment, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, previous AMI, angina pectoris, severe cardiac arrhythmias, evidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy, arterial bleeding, pregnancy or lactation, allergy to any medication, history of convulsions or other central nervous system diseases, grossly over‐ or under‐weight diabetics based on tables size‐weight, musculoskeletal disorders limiting walking ability.

Interventions

Treatment: During 6 month treatment period patients received 600 mg buflomedil per day, 2 x 150 mg tablets taken twice a day.

Control: Matching placebo tablets.

Compliance checked every 3 to 4 weeks by patients returning their bottles to the outpatient clinic where remaining tablets were counted.

Duration: Six months.

Outcomes

Primary: Distances at 6 months constituted the primary response variables. PFWD and MWD measured at entry (baseline) and after 3 and 6 months' treatment using a standardized exercise test on the treadmill (3.6 km/h at 12.5°C).

Secondary: Not stated.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Trübestein 1984

Methods

Study design: States randomized, double‐blinded.

Method of randomization: Not stated.

Blinding: Double‐blinded.

Dropouts: 8 in the placebo group and 12 in the buflomedil group, leaving 93 for analysis (46 in placebo group, 47 in buflomedil group).

Participants

Country: Germany.

Setting: Clinic.

No.: 113 patients.

Age: 50 to 70 years old.

Gender: Not stated.

Inclusion criteria: Symptoms of intermittent claudication for 6 months to 5 years and PFWD of 50 to 400 m.

After a four‐week run‐in period during which all patients received placebo and other vasoactive drugs were stopped, patients were checked to test whether their PFWD differed by not more than 30% from the value at the beginning of the run‐in period (mean of two consecutive measurements). Patients were then allocated randomly to treatment groups.

Exclusion criteria: Special physical training for at least six months prior to study start; systolic blood pressure at the ankle og less than 70 mmHg, diabetic microangiopathy or necrosis, infalmmatory vascular disease such as endarteritis obliterans, coronoary heart disease with angina pectoris, myocardial insufficiency, respiratory insufficiency, arthropathy, symptoms of severe liver or kidney disease, laboratory values of more than 10% outside normal range, pregnancy, beta‐blockers and any other vasoactive drugs.

Interventions

All patients received placebo tablets (four daily ‐ 2 in the morning, one at midday and one in the evening) for four weeks run‐in.

Treatment: Buflomedil 600 mg daily (2 x 150 mg in the morning, 1 x 150 mg at midday and 1 x 150mg in the evening.)

Control: Matching placebo.

Duration: 12 weeks treatment.
(16 weeks in total including the 4 week run‐in period.)

Outcomes

Primary: PFWD and MWD were measured by treadmill (5 km/h at 10° elevation).

Ankle‐arm pressures were measured by Doppler at rest and after exercise and pressure differences (brachial artery‐posterior tibial artery) were calculated.

Measurements were performed at days 28, 56, and 84.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

AMI: acute myocardial infarction
ECG: electrocardiogram
MWD: maximal walking distance
PAOD: peripheral arterial occlusive disease
PFWD: painfree walking distance
SBP: systolic blood pressure

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Bisler 1983

A small study (N = 38) with a mixed protocol of 14 days intravenous therapy (2 x 100 mg) followed by eight weeks oral therapy (daily dose of 600 mg in three doses. The duration of the study was too short (8 weeks) for inclusion. At randomization there were 20 participants in the active group versus 18 in the placebo group. Percentages of smokers and diabetics were not given. No mention of: dropouts, total number of patients screened, or how many of the original 38 patients completed the study.

Fonseca 1988

A small study (N = 34) with six poorly described dropouts (two in the active group, four in the placebo group). 23% of participants were diabetic. Daily dosage of 600 mg given in two doses. The primary aim of the study was to investigate whether buflomedil inhibits platelet aggregation in patients with PAOD. The secondary endpoints were PFWD, MWD and subjective improvement. The results of the primary endpoint were negative and so the researchers shifted attention to the secondary outcomes. Results of treadmill tests expressed in time units and not in distance units. Standard deviations of results not given.

Levien 1983

Study 08 in the meta‐analysis of Walker and Mac Hannaford, but not published. Twenty‐six participants with a mean age of 63 years, treated for six months with 600 mg of buflomedil or placebo. An effect size of ‐0.5 to 1.2 mentioned. We could not obtain this study. Example of publication bias.

Lowe 1987

Unpublished multicenter study mentioned in the meta‐analysis of Walker and Mac Hannaford. We obtained this trial as confidential material with the help of the Cochrane PVD Group. The trial was rather short (12 weeks), daily dosage of 600 mg given in three doses, and results did not provide statistics on variation (SD or SEM). At randomization there were 97 participants in the active group versus 104 in the placebo group. Dropouts (29 in active group and 25 in placebo group) and protocol violations were mentioned but not well described. This study clearly showed negative results for the PFWD.

Lund 1988

Study 11 in the meta‐analysis of Walker and Mac Hannaford, but not published. One hundred and sixty‐eight participants were treated for three months with 600 mg of buflomedil or placebo. We could not retrieve this study. Example of publication bias.

Olsson 1986

Study 10 in the meta‐analysis of Walker and Mac Hannaford, but not published. Sixty patients (mean age?) participated in this study and were treated for three months. An effect size of ‐0.3 to 07 was given. We could not retrieve this study. Example of publication bias.

Raithel 1985

Study 09 in the meta‐analysis of Walker and Mac Hannaford, but not published. One hundred and five participants were treated for four months with a daily dose of 600 mg buflomedil or placebo. An effect size of ‐0.2 to 0.6 was given. We could not obtain this study. Example of publication bias.

Zinnagl 1986

A small study (N = 40), with a short double blind phase of 60 days, inadequate reporting of trial procedures, and no data on variability of results. Total daily dosage was 600 mg given in four doses. Percentages of smokers and diabetics were not given. At randomization there were 20 participants in each group and there were no dropouts.

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Buflomedil versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Painfree walking distance. Meters gain Show forest plot

2

127

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

76.92 [32.32, 121.52]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Buflomedil versus placebo, Outcome 1 Painfree walking distance. Meters gain.

Comparison 1 Buflomedil versus placebo, Outcome 1 Painfree walking distance. Meters gain.

2 Maximal walking distance. Meters gain Show forest plot

2

127

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

112.64 [27.73, 197.54]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Buflomedil versus placebo, Outcome 2 Maximal walking distance. Meters gain.

Comparison 1 Buflomedil versus placebo, Outcome 2 Maximal walking distance. Meters gain.

Comparison 1 Buflomedil versus placebo, Outcome 1 Painfree walking distance. Meters gain.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Buflomedil versus placebo, Outcome 1 Painfree walking distance. Meters gain.

Comparison 1 Buflomedil versus placebo, Outcome 2 Maximal walking distance. Meters gain.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Buflomedil versus placebo, Outcome 2 Maximal walking distance. Meters gain.

Table 1. Search strategy for the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)

Search strategy

#1 MeSH descriptor Intermittent Claudication explode all trees
#2 intermitt* near claudic*
#3 (#1 OR #2)
#4 buflomed*
#5 (#3 AND #4)
#6 sr‐pvd
#7 (#5 AND NOT #6)

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Search strategy for the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)
Comparison 1. Buflomedil versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Painfree walking distance. Meters gain Show forest plot

2

127

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

76.92 [32.32, 121.52]

2 Maximal walking distance. Meters gain Show forest plot

2

127

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

112.64 [27.73, 197.54]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Buflomedil versus placebo