Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Profilaxis antibiótica para la cesárea

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

Referencias de los estudios incluidos en esta revisión

Adeleye 1981 {published data only}

Adeleye JA, Osinusi BO. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in caesarean sections. Singapore Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1981;12:29‐34.

Allen 1972 {published data only}

Allen JL, Rampone JF, Wheeless CR. Use of a prophylactic antibiotic in elective major gynecologic operations. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1972;39:218‐24.

Apuzzio 1982 {published data only}

Appuzzio JJ, Ganesh VV, Pelosi MA, Frisoli G. The effect of prophylactic antibiotics on risk factors for endomyometritis in adolescent patients undergoing cesarean section. Journal of Adolescent Health Care 1984;5:163‐6.
Apuzzio JJ, Reyelt C, Pelosi M, Sen P, Louria DB. Prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean section: comparison of high‐ and low‐risk patients for endomyometritis. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1982;59:693‐8.

Bagratee 2001 {published data only}

Bagratee J, Moodley J, Kleinschmidt I, Zawilski W. A randomized controlled trial of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesaren section. BJOG 2001;108:143‐8.
Bagratee JS, Moodley J. Antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean section. Women's Health ‐ into the new millenium. Proceedings of the 4th International Scientific Meeting of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 1999 October 3‐6; Capetown, South Africa, 1999:6.

Bibi 1994 {published data only}

Bibi M, Megdiche H, Ghanem H, Sfaxi I, Nouira M, Essaidi H, et al. [L'antibioprophylaxie dans les cesariennes a priori sans 'haut risque infectieux']. Journal de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction (Paris) 1994;23:451‐5.

Bilgin 1998 {published data only}

Bilgin T, Ozan H, Dirgen A, Esmer A. Comparison of four different antibiotics as prophylaxis in caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1998;18(6):546‐7.

Bourgeois 1985 {published data only}

Bourgeois FJ, Pinkerton JA, Andersen W, Thiagarajah S. Antibiotic irrigation prophylaxis in the high‐risk cesarean section patient. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1985;153:197‐201.

Carl 2000 {published data only}

Carl SH, Hampton R. Normal saline pelvic and intrauterine irrigation in the high‐risk cesarean section (CS) patient as a safe and cost‐effective method of infection prophylaxis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;182 (1 Pt2):S:96.

Chan 1989 {published data only}

Chan ACW, Leung AKL, Chin RKH, Chang AMZ. Single dose prophylactic antibiotics in caesarean sections. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1989;29:107‐9.

Conover 1984 {published data only}

Conover WB, Moore TR. Comparison of irrigation and intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis at cesarean section. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 1984;39:692‐3.
Conover WB, Moore TR. Comparison of irrigation and intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis at cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1984;63:787‐91.

Cormier 1989 {published data only}

Cormier P, Leng JJ. [Antibioprophylaxie lors des cesariennes]. Societe 1991:600.
Cormier P, Leng JJ, Janky E, Duthil B, Brouste V. Prevention of infectious complications after cesarean section by the use of cefotetan (translation). Journal de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction (Paris) 1989;18:388‐92.

D'Angelo 1980 {published data only}

D'Angelo LJ, Sokol RJ. Short‐ vs long‐course prophylactic antibiotic treatment in cesarean section patients. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1980;55:583‐6.

Dashow 1986 {published data only}

Dashow EE, Read JA, Coleman FH. Randomized comparison of five irrigation solutions at cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1986;68:473‐8.

De Boer 1989 {published data only}

De Boer CN, Thornton JG. Prophylactic short course rectal metronidazole for cesarean section. A double‐blind controlled trial of a simple low cost regimen. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1989;28:103‐7.

Dillon 1981 {published data only}

Dillon WP, Seigel MS, Lele AS, O'Leary JA. Evaluation of cefoxitin prophylaxis for cesarean section. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1981;19:133‐9.

Duff 1980 {published data only}

Duff P, Park RC. Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section in a military population. Military Medicine (Washington DC) 1980;145:377‐81.

Duff 1982 {published data only}

Duff P, Smith PN, Keiser JF. Antibiotic prophylaxis in low‐risk cesarean section. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1982;27:133‐8.

Elliott 1986 {published data only}

Elliott JP, Flaherty JF. Comparison of lavage or intravenous antibiotics at cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1986;67:29‐32.

Engel 1984 {published data only}

Engel K, Amir‐Moazami B, Karschnia R, Hahn T. Advantages and hazards of preventing infection following cesarean section ‐ clinical and bacteriologic results of a high‐dosage treatment with mezlocillin and oxacillin short‐term preventive following clamping of the umbilical cord [Nutzen und gefahren der infektionsprophylaxe bei der sectio caesareo ‐ klinische und bakterioloigische ergebnisse einer hochdosierten kurzzeitprophylaxe nach dem abnabeln mit mezlocillin und oxacillin]. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 1984;44(3):162‐70.
Engel K, Karschnia R. Bacterial flora changes resulting from antimicrobial treatment. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1986;6:6‐8.

Escobedo 1991 {published data only}

Escobedo Lobaton JM, Rodriguez Hinojosa DE, Kistner Garza AM, Benavides de Anda L. Prophylactic use of antibiotics in cesarean section [Uso profilactico de antibioticos en operacion cesarea]. Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico 1991;59(1):35‐8.

Fugere 1983 {published data only}

Fugere P, Turgeon P, Boucher M, Verschelden G, Lemay M. Use of cephalosporins in antibiotic prophylaxis in women undergoing nonelective caesarean section [Utilisation des cephalosporines comme antibioprophylaxie lors de cesariennes]. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1983;129:132‐5.

Gall 1979 {published data only}

Gall SA. The efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in caesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1979;134:506‐11.

Ganesh 1986 {published data only}

Ganesh V, Apuzzio JJ, Dispenziere B, Patel K, Bergen B, Louria DB. Single‐dose trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis for cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1986;154:1113‐4.

Gerstner 1980 {published data only}

Gerstner G, Kofler E, Huber J. Perioperative metronidazol‐prophylaxis for cesarean section (translation). Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie 1980;184:418‐23.

Gibbs 1972 {published data only}

Gibbs RS, De Cherney AH, Schwarz RH. Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section: a double‐blind study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1972;114:1048‐53.

Gibbs 1973 {published data only}

Gibbs RS, Hunt JE, Schwarz RH. A follow‐up study on prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1973;117:419‐22.

Gibbs 1981 {published data only}

Gibbs RS, St Clair PJ, Castillo MS, Castaneda YS. Bacteriologic effects of antibiotic prophylaxis in high‐risk cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1981;57:277‐82.

Gordon 1979 {published data only}

Gordon HR, Phelps D, Blanchard K. Prophylactic cesarean section antibiotics: maternal and neonatal morbidity before or after cord clamping. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1979;53:151‐6.

Gummerus 1984 {published data only}

Gummerus M. Perioperative short‐term prophylaxis of puerperal infections following caesarean section with metronidazol. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 1984;44:570‐2.

Hager 1983 {published data only}

Hager WD, Williamson MM. Effects of antibiotic prophylaxis on women undergoing nonelective cesarean section in a community hospital. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1983;28:687‐90.

Hagglund 1989 {published data only}

Hagglund L, Christensen KK, Christensen P, Westrom L, Ingemarsson I. Reduced rate of postoperative infections in emergency cesarean section after two doses of cefuroxim perioperatively. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1989;68:201‐4.

Harger 1981 {published data only}

Harger JH, English DH. Selection of patients for antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean sections. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1981;141:752‐8.

Hawrylyshyn 1983 {published data only}

Hawrylyshyn PA, Bernstein EP, Papsin FR. Short‐term antibiotic prophylaxis in high‐risk patients following cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1983;145:285‐9.

Ismail 1990 {published data only}

Ismail MA, Nelson KE, Larson P, Moses VK. Selective effect of cefoxitin prophylaxis on post‐cesarean‐section microbial flora. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1990;35:168‐74.

Jaffe 1985 {published data only}

Jaffe R, Altaras M, Cohen I, Ben‐Aderet N. Single‐dose mezlocillin prophylaxis in emergency cesarean section. Clinical Therapeutics 1985;7(4):507‐11.

Jakobi 1994 {published data only}

Jakobi P, Weissman A, Sigler E, Margolis K, Zimmer EZ. Post‐cesarean section febrile morbidity. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1994;39:707‐10.

Karhunen 1985 {published data only}

Karhunen M, Koskela O, Teisala K, Suikkari AM, Mattila J. Prophylaxis and treatment of anaerobic infections following caesarean section with tinidazole. Chemotherapy 1985;31:228‐36.

Kellum 1985 {published data only}

Kellum RB, Roberts WE, Harris JB, Khansur N, Morrison JC. Effect of intrauterine antibiotic lavage after cesarean birth on postoperative morbidity. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1985;30:527‐9.

Kreutner 1978 {published data only}

Kreutner AK, Del Bene VE, Delamar D, Huguley V, Harmon PM, Mitchell KS. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1978;52:279‐84.

Kristensen 1990 {published data only}

Kristensen GB, Beiter EC, Mather O. Single‐dose cefuroxime prophylaxis in non‐elective cesarean section. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1990;69:497‐500.

Lapas 1988 {published data only}

Lapas KA, Todorov I. Comparative double‐blind study of intravenous metronidazole vs placebo in preventing infection after cesarean section. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia 1988;27:46‐9.
Lappas CA, Leonardopoulos J. Double‐blind comparative study of metronidazole iv vs placebo in the prophylaxis of sepsis following cesarean section. Archives of Gynecology 1985;237 (suppl 1):279.

Leonetti 1989 {published data only}

Leonetti HB, Yun H, O'Leary JA, Greenberg AL. Single vs multiple dose piperacillin in high risk primary cesarean section. American Journal of Gynecologic Health 1989;3:195‐8.

Levin 1983 {published data only}

Levin DK, Gorchels C, Andersen R. Reduction of post‐cesarean section infectious morbidity by means of antibiotic irrigation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1983;147:273‐7.

Lewis 1990 {published data only}

Lewis DF, Otterson WN, Dunnihoo DR. Antibiotic prophylactic uterine lavage in cesarean section: a double‐blind comparison of saline, ticarcillin, and cefoxitin irrigation in indigent patients. Southern Medical Journal 1990;83:274‐6.

Mahomed 1988 {published data only}

Mahomed K. A double‐blind randomized controlled trial on the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing elective caesarean section. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1988;95:689‐92.

Mallaret 1990 {published data only}

Mallaret MR, Blatier JF, Racinet C, Fauconnier J, Favier M, Micoud M. Economic benefit of using antibiotics prophylactically in cesarean sections with little risk of infection. Journal de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction (Paris) 1990;19:1061‐4.
Racinet C, Mallaret MR, Favier M, Berthet J, Morel I, Fauconnier J, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean sections without high risk of infection. Presse Medicale 1990;19:1755‐8.

McCowan 1980 {published data only}

McCowan L, Jackson P. The prophylactic use of metronidazole in caesarean section. New Zealand Medical Journal 1980;92:153‐5.

Miller 1968 {published data only}

Miller RD, Crichton D. Ampicillin prophylaxis in caesarean section. South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1968;6:69‐70.

Moodley 1981 {published data only}

Moodley J, Zeeman DJ. Prophylactic and antimicrobial therapy using lincomycin in patients undergoing emergency caesarean section. South African Medical Journal 1981;59:911‐3.

Moro 1974 {published data only}

Moro M, Andrews M. Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1974;44:688‐92.

Morrison 1973 {published data only}

Morrison JC, Coxwell WL, Kennedy BS, Schreier PC, Wiser WL, Fish SA. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing cesarean section. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1973;136:425‐8.

Ng 1992 {published data only}

Ng NK. The role of prophylactic antibiotics in caesarean section ‐ a randomized trial. Medical Journal of Malaysia 1992;47:273‐9.

Padilla 1983 {published data only}

Padilla SL, Spence MR, Beauchamp PJ. Single‐dose ampicillin for cesarean section prophylaxis. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1983;61:463‐6.

Phelan 1979 {published data only}

Phelan JP, Pruyn SC. Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section: a double‐blind study of cefalozin. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1979;133:474‐8.

Polk 1982 {published data only}

Polk BF, Krache M, Phillippe M, Munoz A, Hutchinson D, Miao L, et al. Randomized clinical trial of perioperative cefoxitin in preventing maternal infection after primary cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1982;142:983‐7.

Reckel 1985 {published data only}

Reckel J, Scheele R. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section [Perioperative Antibiotikaprophylaxe bei Kaiserschnitt]. Der Klinikarzt 1985;14:1054‐65.

Rehu 1980 {published data only}

Rehu M, Jahkola M. Prophylactic antibiotics in caesarean section: effect of a short preoperative course of benzyl penicillin or clindamycin plus gentamicin on postoperative infectious morbidity. Annals of Clinical Research 1980;12:45‐8.

Rizk 1998 {published data only}

Rizk DEE, Nsanze H, Mabrouk MH, Mustafa N, Thomas L, Kumar M. Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in elective cesarean delivery. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1998;61(3):245‐51.

Roex 1986 {published data only}

Roex AJM, Puyenbroek JI, MacLaren DM, Van Geijn HP, Arts NFT. A randomized clinical trial of antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section: maternal morbidity, risk factors and bacteriological changes. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 1986;22:117‐24.
Roex AJM, Puyenbroek JI, Maclaren DM, Arts NFTh. [Kortdurende antibioticum profylaxe bij de section Caesarea]. Nederland Tijdschrift voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie 1987;100:105.

Ross 1984 {published data only}

Ross L, Mason P, Barnet‐Lamb M, Robinson RE, Warren R. Prophylactic metronidazole in patients with ruptured membranes undergoing emergency caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1984;5:32‐5.

Rothbard 1975 {published data only}

Rothbard MJ, Mayer W, Wystepek A, Gordon M. Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1975;45:421‐4.

Rouzi 2000 {published data only}

Rouzi AA, Khalifa F, Ba'aqeel H, Al‐Hamdan HS, Bondagji N. The routine use of cefazolin in cesarean section. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2000;69:107‐12.

Rudd 1981 {published data only}

Long WH, Rudd EG, Dillon MB. Intrauterine irrigation with cefamandole nafate solution at cesarean section: a preliminary report. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1980;138:755‐8.
Rudd EG, Long WH, Dillon MB. Febrile morbidity following cefamandole nafate intrauterine irrigation during cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1981;141:12‐6.

Ruiz‐Moreno 1991 {published data only}

Ruiz‐Moreno JA, Garcia‐Rojas JM, Lozada‐Leon JD. Prevention of post cesarean infectious morbidity with a single dose of intravenous metronidazole. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1991;34:217‐20.

Saltzman 1985 {published data only}

Saltzman DH, Eron LJ, Kay HH, Sites JG. Single‐dose antibiotic prophylaxis in high‐risk patients undergoing cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1985;65:655‐7.

Sanchez‐Ramos 1999 {published data only}

Sanchez‐Ramos L, Pitt C, Delke I, Gaudier FL. Preoperative administration of intravaginal metronidazole for the prevention of post‐cesarena endometritis: a randomized double‐blind trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999;180 (1 Pt 2):S:81.

Scarpignato 1982 {published data only}

Scarpignato C, Caltabiano M, Condemi V, Mansani FE. Short‐term vs long‐term cefuroxime prophylaxis in patients undergoing emergency cesarean section. Clinical Therapeutics 1982;5:186‐92.

Schedvins 1986 {published data only}

Schedvins K, Moberg PJ. Prevention of postoperative infection in cesarean section after rupture of the membranes. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1986;24:165‐8.

Shah 1998 {published data only}

Shah S, Mazher Y, John IS. Single or triple dose piperacillin prophylaxis in elective cesarean section. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1998;62(1):23‐9.

Stage 1982 {published data only}

Stage AH, Glover DD, Vaughan JE. Low‐dose cephradine prophylaxis in obstetric and gynecologic surgery. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1982;27:113‐9.

Stiver 1983 {published data only}

Stiver HG, Forward KR, Livingstone RA, Fugere P, Lemay M, Verschelden G, et al. Multicenter comparison of cefoxitin vs cefazolin for prevention of infectious morbidity after nonelective cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1983;145:158‐63.
Stiver HG, Forward KR, Tyrrell DL, Krip G, Livingstone RA, Fugere P, et al. Comparative cervical microflora shifts after cefoxitin or cefazolin prophylaxis against infection following cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1984;149(7):718‐21.

Tully 1983 {published data only}

Tully JL, Klapholz H, Baldini LM, Friedland GH. Perioperative use of cefoxitin in primary cesarean section. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1983;28:827‐32.

Turner 1990 {published data only}

Turner MJ, Egan DM, Qureshi WA, Skehan M, Black A, Darrell JH, et al. Use of cephradine prophylaxis of infection after caesarean section: stepwise logistic regression analysis of relevant factors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1990;10:204‐9.

Tzingounis 1982 {published data only}

Tzingounis V, Makris N, Zolotas J, Michalas S, Aravantinos D. Cefuroxime prophylaxis in caesarean section. Pharmatherapeutica 1982;3:140‐3.

Walss Rodriguez 1990 {published data only}

Walss Rodriguez R, Avila Esparza M. Prophylactic antimicrobial therapy in cesarean section [Antibioticoterapia profilactica en operacion cesarea]. Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico 1990;58:79‐83.

Weissberg 1971 {published data only}

Weissberg SM, Edwards NL, O'Leary JA. Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1971;38:290‐3.

Wong 1978 {published data only}

Wong R, Gee CL, Ledger WJ. Prophylactic use of cefazolin in monitored obstetric patients undergoing cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1978;51:407‐11.

Work 1977 {published data only}

Work BA. Role of preventive antibiotics in patients undergoing cesarean section. South African Medical Journal 1977;70:44‐5.

Wu 1991 {published data only}

Wu Y. Prevention of post‐operative infection by using antibiotics of 217 cases of cesarean section. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992;27:73‐5.
Wu Y, Zhan L, Jing Y. Prevention of post‐operative infection by uterine and intraperitoneal irrigation with ampicillin during cesarean section. International Journal of Experimental and Clinical Chemotherapy 1991;4(3):132‐6.

Yip 1997 {published data only}

Yip SK, Lau TK, Rogers MS. A study on prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean sections ‐ is it worthwhile?. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1997;76:547‐9.

Young 1983 {published data only}

Young R, Platt L, Ledger W. Prophylactic cefoxitin in cesarean section. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1983;157:11‐4.

Referencias de los estudios excluidos de esta revisión

Cormier 1988 {published data only}

Cormier Ph, Leng JJ, Janky E, Brouste V, Duthil B. [Prevention par l'utilization du cefotetan des complications infectieuses du post‐partum et du post‐abortum dans les manoevres endo‐manoeuvres uterines]. Revue Francaise de Gynecologie et d Obstetrique 1988;83:829‐32.

Creatsas 1980 {published data only}

Creatsas G, Pavlatos M, Lolis D, Kaskarelis D. Ampicillin and gentamicin in the treatment of fetal intrauterine infections. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 1980;8:13‐8.

De Palma 1980 {published data only}

De Palma RT, Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG, Pope T, Kappus SS, Roark ML, et al. Identification and management of women at high risk for pelvic infection following cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1980;55:185S‐92S.

Elliott 1982 {published data only}

Elliott JP, Freeman RK, Dorchester W. Short versus long course of prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1982;143:740‐4.

Itskovitz 1979 {published data only}

Itskovitz J, Paldi E, Katz M. The effect of prophylactic antibiotics on febrile morbidity following cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1979;53:162‐5.

Kreutner 1979 {published data only}

Kreutner AK, Del Bene VE, Delamar D, Bodden JL, Loadholt CB. Perioperative cephalosporin prophylaxis in cesarean section: effect on endometritis in the high‐risk patient. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1979;134:925‐35.

Louie 1982 {published data only}

Louie TJ, Binns BAO, Baskett TF, Ross J, Koss J. Cefotaxime, cefazolin, or ampicillin prophylaxis of febrile morbidity in emergency cesarean sections. Clinical Therapeutics 1982;5:83‐96.

Pawelec 1994 {published data only}

Pawelec M, Michalik T, Robaczynski J. One‐dose administration of Mandol in the prevention of infection after caesarean section. Proceedings of 14th European congress of Perinatal Medicine; 1994; Helsinki, Finland, 1994:389.

Petersen 1985 {published data only}

Petersen C, Brautigam HH. Short‐term peri‐operative prophylaxis with cefotaxim in gynaecological and obstetric surgery. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 1985;110:1369‐74.

Pitt 2001 {published data only}

Pitt C, Sanchez‐Ramos L, Kaunitz A. Adjunctive intravaginal metronidazole for the prevention of postcesarean endometritis: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001;98:745‐50.

Roex 1987 {published data only}

Roex AJM, Van Loenen AC, Puyenbroek JI, Arts NFT. Secretion of cefoxitin in breast milk following short‐term prophylactic administration in caesarean section. European Journal Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 1987;25:299‐302.

Sengupta 1976 {published data only}

Sengupta BS, Wynter HH, Hall JS, Ramchander R, Alexis A, Zamah N, Gajraj K. Prophylactic antibiotic in elective gynaecological and obstetrical major surgery. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1976;14:417‐24.

Skryten 1988 {published data only}

Skryten A, et al. The efficacy of perioperative cefoxitin prophylaxis in preventing infectious morbidity after nonelective cesarean section. World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics; 1988 October 23‐28; Brazil, 1988:713.

Spreafico 1987 {published data only}

Spreafico P, Scian A, Epis A, Vassen L, Bonazzi C, Lovotti M. Cesarean Section: antibiotic prophylaxis with ceftezole. Chemotherapia 1987;6(2S):613‐6.

Ujah 1992 {published data only}

Ujah I, Olarewaju R. The use of prophyactic Augmentin in elective caesarean section in Jos University teaching hospital. Proceedings of 26th British Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 1992; Manchester, UK, 1992:484.

Voto 1986 {published data only}

Voto LS, Benolief LA, Muniz AA, Trepat A, Balsechi EE, Margulies M. Prophylaxis of post‐cesarean section puerperal infection with the use of cefoxitin antibiotics [Profilaxis de la infeccion puerperal post‐cesarea medianta el uso del antibiotico cefoxitina]. Obstetricia y Ginecologia Latino‐Americanas 1986;44:419‐24.

Wallace 1984 {published data only}

Wallace RL, Eglinton GS, Yonekura ML, Wallace TM. Extraperitoneal cesarean section: a surgical form of infection prophylaxis?. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1984;148:172‐7.

Wells 1994 {published data only}

Wells M, McCullough W, Rymer J. Antibiotic prophylaxis in emergency Caesarean section. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1994;46:77.

Referencias de los estudios en espera de evaluación

Krasnodebski 1997 {published data only}

Krasnodebski J, Stolecki M. A single dose of antibiotic ‐ as a prophylaxis during cesarean section (translation). Ginekologia Polska 1997;68:30‐5.

Oestreicher 1987 {published data only}

Oestreicher M, Oestreicher S, Dudenhausen JW. Prospective study on the question of single‐dose antibiotic prophylaxis for primarily indicated abdominal cesarean section (translation). Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie 1987;191:12‐4.

Sokolowski 1989 {published data only}

Sokolowski VH, Canzler E, Brotzmann C. Influence of vagimid prophylaxis on course of puerperium and healing of the wound after caesarean section in comparison with a control group (translation). Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie 1989;111:461‐5.

Baker 1995

Baker C, Luce J, Chenoweth C, Friedman C. Comparison of case‐finding methodologies for endometritis after cesarean section. American Journal of Infection Control 1995;23:27‐33.

Beattie 1994

Beattie PG, Rings TR, Hunter MF, Lake Y. Risk factors for wound infection following caesarean section. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1994;34:398‐402.

Boggess 1996

Boggess KA, Watts DH, Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Benedetti TJ, Eschenbach DA. Bacteremia shortly after placental separation during cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996;87:779‐84.

Chelmow 2001

Chelmow D, Rueehli MS, Huang E. Prophylactic use of antibiotics for nonlaboring patients undergoing cesarean delivery with intact membranes: a meta‐analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001;184(4):656‐61.

Classen 1992

Classen DC, Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Horn SD, Menlove RL, Burke JP. The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical‐wound infection. New England Journal of Medicine 1992;326(5):281‐6.

Cunningham 1983

Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, DePalma RT, Roark M, Rosenfeld CR. Perioperative antimicrobials for cesarean delivery: before or after cord clamping. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1983;62(2):151‐4.

Desjardins 1996

Desjardins C, Diallo HO, Audet‐Lapointe P, Harel F. Retrospective study of post‐cesarean endometritis. 1992‐1993. Journal de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 1996;25:419‐23.

Ehrenkrans 1990

Ehrenkranz NJ, Blackwelder WC, Pfaff SJ, Poppe D, Yerg DE, Kaslow RA. Infections complicating low‐risk cesarean sections in community hospitals: efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990;162:337‐43.

Emmons 1988

Emmons SL, Krohn M, Jackson M, Eschenbach DA. Development of wound infections among women undergoing cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1988;72:559‐64.

Enkin 1989

Enkin MW, Enkin E, Chalmers I, Hemminki E. Prophylactic antibiotics in association with caesarean section. In: Chalmers I, Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC editor(s). Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989:1246‐69.

Galask 1987

Galask RP. Changing concepts in obstetric antibiotic prophylaxis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1987;157(2):491‐7.

Gibbs 1980

Gibbs RS. Clinical risk factors for puerperal infection. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1980;55:178S‐83S.

Gilstrap 1988

Gilstrap LC. Prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean section and surgical procedures. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1988;33:588‐90.

Henderson 1995

Henderson E, Love EJ. Incidence of hospital‐acquired infections associated with caesarean section. Journal of Hospital Infection 1995;29:245‐55.

Hopkins 2002

Hopkins L, Smaill F. Antibiotic prophylaxis regimens and drugs for cesarean section (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library 2002, Issue 2.

Howey 1990

Howie PW, Davey PG. Prophylactic antibiotics and caesarean section. BMJ 1990;300:2‐3.

Hulton 1992

Hulton LJ, Olmsted RN, Treston‐Aurand J, Craig CP. Effect of postdischarge surveillance on rates of infectious complications after cesarean section. American Journal of Infection Control 1992;20:198‐201.

Huskins 2001

Huskins WC, Ba‐Thike K, Festin MR, Limpongsanurak S, Lumbiganon P, Peedicayil A, et al. An international survey of practice variation in the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2001;73(2):141‐5.

Killian 2001

Killian CA, Graffunder EM, Vinciguerra TJ, Venezia RA. Risk factors for surgical‐site infections following cesarean section. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2001;22:613‐7.

Leigh 1990

Leigh DA, Emmanuel FX, Sedgwick J, Dean R. Post‐operative urinary tract infection and wound infection in women undergoing caesarean section: a comparison of two study periods in 1985 and 1987. Journal of Hospital Infection 1990;15:107‐16.

MacLean 1990

MacLean AB. Puerperal pyrexia. In: MacLean AB editor(s). Clinical Infection in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1990:195‐209.

Magann 1995

Magann EF, Washburne JF, Harris RL, Bass JD, Duff WP, Morrison JC. Infectious morbidity, operative blood loss, and length of the operative procedure after cesarean delivery by method of placental removal and site of uterine repair. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 1995;181:517‐20.

Mah 2001

Mah MW, Pyper AM, Oni GA, Memish ZA. Impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on wound infection after cesarean section in a situation of expected high risk. American Journal of Infection Control 2001;29(2):85‐8.

Mallaret 1990a

Mallaret MR, Blatier JF, Racinet C, Fauconnier J, Favier M, Micoud M. Economic benefit of using antibiotics prophylactically in cesarean sections with little risk of infection. Journal de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction (Paris) 1990;19:1061‐4.

Martens 1995

Martens MG, Kolrud BL, Faro S, Maccato M, Hammill H. Development of wound infection or separation after cesarean delivery. Prospective evaluation of 2,431 cases. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1995;40:171‐5.

Mugford 1989

Mugford M, Kingston J, Chalmers I. Reducing the incidence of infection after caesarean section: implications of prophylaxis for hospital resources. BMJ 1989;299:1003‐6.

NNIS 2000

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Heatlh Services. Aggregated Data from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveilland (NNIS) System. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/hip/SURVEILL/NNIS.HTM(accessed December 2000).

Owen 1994

Owen J, Andrews WW. Wound complications after cesarean sections. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994;37:842‐55.

Pedersen 1996

Pedersen TK, Blaakaer J. Antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1996;75:537‐9.

Roberts 1993

Roberts S, Maccato M, Faro S, Pinell P. The microbiology of post‐cesarean wound morbidity. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;81:383‐6.

Shlaes 1997

Shlaes DM, Gerding DN, John JJ, Craig WA, Bornstein DL, Duncan RA, et al. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and Infectious Diseases Society of America Joint Committee on the prevention of antimicrobial resistance in hospitals. Clinical Infectious Diseases 1997;25:584‐99.

Suonio 1989

Suonio S, Saarikoski S, Vohlonen I, Kauhanen O. Risk factors for fever, endometritis and wound infection after abdominal delivery. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1989;29:135‐42.

Watts 1990

Watts DH, Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Eschenbach DA. Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for post‐cesarean endometritis. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990;75:52‐8.

Watts 1991

Watts DH, Hillier SL, Eschenbach DA. Upper genital tract isolates at delivery as predictors of post‐cesarean infection among women receiving antibiotic prophylaxis. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991;77:287‐92.

Watts 1992

Watts DH, Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Eschenbach DA. The association of occult amniotic fluid infection with gestational age and neonatal outcome among women in preterm labor. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992;79:351‐7.

Wax 1997

Wax JR, Hersey K, Philput C, Wright MS, Nichols KV, Eggleston MK, et al. Single dose cefazolin prophylaxis for postcesarean infections: before vs after cord clamping. Journal of Maternal Fetal Medicine 1997;6(1):61‐5.

Webster 1988

Webster J. Post‐caesarean wound infection: a review of the risk factors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1988;28:210‐7.

Weinberg 2001

Weinberg M, Fuentes JM, Ruiz AI, Lozano FW, Angel E, Gaitan H, et al. Reducing infections among women undergoing cesarean section in Columbia by means of continuous quality improvement methods. Archives of Internal Medicine 2001;161:2357‐65.

Referencias de otras versiones publicadas de esta revisión

Smaill 1995a

Smaill F. Prophylactic antibiotics for elective Caesarean section. [revised 06 May 1993] In: Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew MJ, Neilson JP, Crowther C (eds.) Pregnancy and Childbirth Module. In: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Database [database on disk and CDROM]. The Cochrane Collaboration; Issue 2, Oxford: Update Software; 1995.

Smaill 1995b

Smaill F. Prophylactic antibiotics in Caesarean section (all trials). [revised 03 August 1994] In: Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew MJ, Neilson JP, Crowther C (eds.) Pregnancy and Childbirth Module. In: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Database [database on disk and CDROM]. The Cochrane Collaboration; Issue 2, Oxford: Update Software; 1995.

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Adeleye 1981

Methods

'Divided randomly into two groups'; not placebo‐controlled.
Imbalance in group size not accounted for (58 vs 48).

Participants

Both elective and non‐elective cesarean deliveries.
Exclusion criteria: fever or obvious infection before operation.
Setting: University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Majority of patients from low socio‐economic class.

Interventions

Ampicillin 500mg before operation and 250mg 6 hourly for at least 7 days (intramuscularly until able to take orally) (n = 58) versus no antibiotics unless temperature 38 degrees C after the third postoperative day (n = 48). Both groups received curative doses of chloroquine.

Outcomes

Wound infection; urinary tract infection (not defined further); 'genital sepsis' (not defined further).

Notes

Episodes of 'genital sepsis' classified as endometritis.
Prophylaxis continued for 7 days.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Allen 1972

Methods

Randomized list of placebo or drug, kept in hospital pharmacy; code not broken until after patient classified as 'morbid' or 'non‐morbid'; placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section (criteria not specified).
Exclusion: evidence of clinical infection, history of penicillin allergy.
Setting: Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, US; August 1970 ‐ January 1971.

Interventions

Cephalothin 1g IV on call to operating room, further 2g IV intra‐operatively and every 6 hours for 48 hours, then 500mg IM for additional 72 hours (n = 5) versus placebo (n = 7).

Outcomes

Morbidity (temperature > 100.9 degrees fahrenheit twice, 6 hours apart after first 48 hours or other clinical signs of infection); not separated. For this review, the authors' definition of morbidity has been classified as fever.

Notes

Part of a larger randomized trial of prophylactic antibiotics in gynecologic surgery; most patients (87%) were undergoing hysterectomy; only 12/300 patients enrolled underwent cesarean section.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Apuzzio 1982

Methods

Double blind, placebo controlled. 'Randomly divided into 2 groups'.
Discrepancy in group numbers (139 vs 120) not accounted for.

Participants

Both elective and non‐elective cesarean deliveries.
Exclusion criteria: antibiotics within 2 weeks; pyrexia; any visible infection; penicillin allergy; known medical illness that might cause pyrexia; internal fetal scalp or uterine monitoring.
Setting: College Hospital, New Jersey, October 1977 to June 1980. Women 'predominantly black (90%) and socioeconomically disadvantaged'.

Interventions

Ticarcillin 6g intravenously within 15 minutes of cord clamping (n = 139) versus saline placebo (n = 120). Subset of 22 in each group received ticarcillin 3g/saline 6‐8 hours postoperatively (results similar so authors combined results with single dose group).
No postoperative antibiotics unless pyrexial >38 degrees C after day 1.

Outcomes

Endomyometritis (pyrexia, uterine tenderness and no evidence of other infection).

Notes

Authors' definition of low and high risk not comparable to definitions for elective/non‐elective used in this review.
Results for adolescent group (aged 15‐18) reported in J Adolescent Health Care 1984;5:163‐166. In that study, incidence of endomyometritis in elective section: 0% for treatment vs 43% for placebo (numbers not given).

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Bagratee 2001

Methods

Randomized (computer‐based allocation), double‐blind, placebo controlled.
All patients accounted for; intent to treat analysis performed.

Participants

Women undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Exclusion: prior antibiotics within 2 weeks, allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin, rupture of membranes.
Setting: Durban, South Africa.

Interventions

Cefoxitin (2g IV after cord clamping) (n = 237) vs matching placebo (n = 238).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (oral temperature >38 degrees C twice 6 hours apart after first 24 hours); wound infection (wound cellulitis, erythema, discharge with or without fever); endometritis (fever, uterine tenderness, malodorous lochia); urinary tract infection (fever and positive urine culture); pneumonia; duration of hospital stay.

Notes

11% were HIV positive; Staphylococcus aureus most common pathogen (43%) isolated.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Bibi 1994

Methods

Allocation using random number table; not placebo controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing elective cesarean section or labour <12 hours.
Exclusion criteria: diagnosed amniotic infection; pyrexia >38 degrees C; antibiotics within 3 days; allergy to beta lactam antibiotics; cardiac disease; diabetes.
Setting: Sousse Hospital, Tunisia, February to July 1991.

Interventions

Cephapirine 1g IV with induction of anaesthesia and 6 hours after operation, gentamycin 80mg IM with induction, metronidazole 500mg IV with induction (n = 133), versus no treatment (n = 136).

Outcomes

Endometritis; wound infection; pyrexia only (>38 degrees C 48 hours after surgery): antibiotic 4/133 vs control 9/136; septicemia (0/133 vs 3/136, included as serious morbidity); duration of hospital stay (antibiotic 5.36 days vs control 6.21, p = 0.03, variance not given).

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Bilgin 1998

Methods

Allocated using last digit of patient's file number to treatment or no treatment.
No dropouts.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section due to acute fetal distress.
Setting: Bursa, Turkey.

Interventions

Ceftriaxone 1g (n = 25) vs mezlocillin 2g (n = 23) vs clindamycin 600mg and amikacin 500mg (n = 18) vs sulbactam ampicillin 1g (n = 25) intravenously after clamping of the cord vs no treatment (n = 28).

Outcomes

Wound infection (redness, tenderness, pain and purulent discharge); urinary tract infection (renal angle tenderness, fever, dysuria and pyuria); endometritis (vaginal spotting, purulent discharge with fever and pain) plus positive cultures.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

High risk

C ‐ Inadequate

Bourgeois 1985

Methods

Randomized (computer‐generated), partially double blind placebo‐controlled (3 groups: antibiotic irrigation, saline placebo irrigation, no irrigation). As the objective of this review is to compare antibiotic with no antibiotic, rather than the effect of irrigation, only the first 2 groups are compared (double blind comparison).

Participants

Both 'low risk' (labor < 6 hours) and 'high risk' (>6 hours) women undergoing cesarean section.
Exclusion criteria: allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin; antibiotic use within 7 days; antibiotics required for other reasons; pyrexia >38 degrees C; foul amniotic fluid.
Setting: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA, initiated March 1981; almost all were indigent women.

Interventions

Irrigation of the uterus and peritoneal cavity with 2g cefamandole in 1000ml normal saline (n = 73), versus saline placebo (n = 75).

Outcomes

Metritis (pyrexia >38 degrees C twice 8 hours apart, after 24 hours plus abnormal uterine tenderness, without another apparent source); duration of maternal stay (treatment 5.29 days vs placebo 6.32 days, variance could not be calculated).

Notes

Authors' definition of low and high risk do not correspond to those used for elective/non‐elective in this review.
No treated patients developed evidence of drug reaction.
There were no serious infections (pelvic abscess or phlebitis) in either group.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Carl 2000

Methods

Randomly allocated (abstract only; no further details).

Participants

Women undergoing high‐risk cesarean section.
Setting: Texas, USA.

Interventions

Cefazolin 2g in 1000ml irrigation (n = 20) vs normal saline 1000ml irrigation (n = 20).

Outcomes

Wound infection, endometritis, urinary tract infection.

Notes

Follow up 4‐6 weeks post‐operatively.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Chan 1989

Methods

'Double blind' randomized trial (the anaesthetist was not blind); list of random numbers consulted by nurse.

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section.
Exclusion criteria: receiving antibiotics; pyrexia >37.4 degrees C; diagnosed infection; increased risk of infection, eg diabetes; known sensitivity to the antibiotics.
Mostly suburban or rural Chinese women of lower or middle class.
Setting: Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong; October 1986 to February 1987.

Interventions

Intravenous therapy at time of induction of anaesthesia: ampicillin 1g (n = 96); ampicillin 1g and metronidazole 500mg (n = 104); ampicillin 1g and salbactam 500mg (n = 99), versus placebo (normal saline) (n = 101). Results of the three treatment groups combined.

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (oral temperature of more than 38 degrees C at least twice after day 1); wound infection (induration, serosanguinous discharge or dehiscence with purulent discharge); urinary tract infection (positive culture); genital tract infection (pain and uterine tenderness, purulent uterine discharge with microbiological confirmation); any infection anywhere (antibiotic 75/299 vs placebo 28/101); post‐operative antibiotic use (22/299 vs 9/101).

Notes

Only moderate or prolonged febrile morbidity (as defined) included.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Conover 1984

Methods

Double blind placebo controlled, computer generated sequence. Allocation to irrigation or intravenous route according to social security number.
Imbalance in randomized groups not accounted for (irrigation: cefoxitin 37 vs saline 23; overall 68 vs 56).

Participants

Women at increased risk of post‐cesarean section endometritis (in labor or with ruptured membranes). Classified as non‐elective for this review.
Exclusion criteria: allergy to penicillin or cephalosporins; antibiotic use within 48 hours; separate indication for use of antibiotics; temperature >38 degrees C; chorioamnionitis; pyuria.
Setting: Naval Hospital, San Diego, California; March to November 1982.

Interventions

Administration by irrigation of uterus and peritoneal cavity with 2g cefoxitin in 500ml saline (n = 37), versus 500ml normal saline (n = 23), or intravenously after clamping of the umbilical cord, cefoxitin 2g (n = 31) versus saline (n = 33). Irrigation and intravenous groups combined for this review.

Outcomes

Endometritis (febrile morbidity and uterine tenderness); total infection‐related morbidity (cefoxitin 10/68 vs saline 14/56); fever index; duration of intravenous antibiotics; additional antibiotics; days in hospital (no difference, variance not given).

Notes

One woman developed an allergic reaction to cefoxitin (acute pruritic rash).
There were two episodes of bacteremia (both in placebo groups); there were no episodes of septic pelvic thrombophlebitis nor drainage of pelvic abscess in either group.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Cormier 1989

Methods

Allocated by sealed envelopes; not blinded or placebo controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section; both elective and non‐elective deliveries.
Exclusion criteria: allergy to beta‐lactam antibiotics; pyrexia; indication for antibiotics.
Setting: Hopital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France.

Interventions

Cefotetan 2g after clamping of umbilical cord (n = 55) versus no antibiotic (n = 55).

Outcomes

Endometritis; urinary infection; local complications; fever only (cefotetan 0/55 vs control 6/55); antibiotic therapy (10/55 vs 25/55); mean days in hospital (10.0 vs 10.2, no variance given).

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

D'Angelo 1980

Methods

'Randomly assigned', no details given; not placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women in labour with ruptured membranes requiring internal monitoring (non‐elective delivery).
Exclusion criteria: evidence of infection; penicillin or cephalosporin allergy.
Setting: Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Interventions

Short course kefzol (1g intravenously 6 hourly for 24 hours, n = 24); long course (kefzol 1g intravenously for 8 or more doses and keflex 500mg orally 6 hourly for 5 days, n = 25); versus no prophylactic antibiotics. Short and long courses combined for this review.

Outcomes

Endometritis and/or wound infection (antibiotic 12/49 vs control 20/31).

Notes

It was possible to deduce the rate of endometritis alone, but not wound infection, for this review.
One late infectious complication (wound dehiscence) in control group.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Dashow 1986

Methods

Double blind placebo controlled trial. Computer‐generated numbers using the mixed congruential method.

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section.
Exclusion criteria: penicillin or cephalosporin allergy; antibiotic therapy; known infectious process.
Setting: Madigan Army Medical Centre, Tacoma, Washington, USA. December 1982 to May 1984.

Interventions

Irrigation during cesarean section with 2g of either cephapirin sodium (n = 79), cefamandole nafate (n = 70), moxalactam disodium (n = 64) or ampicillin sodium (n = 70), versus saline (n = 77). A vitamin was added to each solution for disguise. The antibiotic groups have been considered together in this review.

Outcomes

Fever (>38 degrees C twice 6 hours apart, excluding the first 24 hours); endomyometritis (pyrexia >37.8 degrees C, uterine tenderness and pelvic peritoneal irritation without other localising signs of irritation; urinary tract infection (positive culture); wound infection; fever index; all infection‐related morbidity; therapeutic antibiotics; mean postoperative days (variance not given).

Notes

Three episodes of pelvic thrombophlebitis (all in treated groups).
Results were given for all women and women in labour, both high risk (corresponding to the category of non‐elective deliveries) and all labour. The data for elective deliveries were deduced from these.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

De Boer 1989

Methods

Randomized, double blind, placebo‐controlled.
7/189 patients initially randomized were not included in analysis.

Participants

All patients undergoing cesarean section.
Exclusion criteria: clinical infection.
Setting: Chogoria Hospital, Kenya; December 1983 to June 1985.

Interventions

Metronidazole 1g rectal suppository 10‐45 minutes before and 8 hours after procedure (n = 91) versus placebo suppository (n = 91).

Outcomes

Fever (>37.9 degrees C on at least one occasion); wound infection; mean febrile days (0.56 for treatment vs 1.23 for control), hospital days, any antibiotic use (18/91 vs 23/91).

Notes

Elective cesarean section not defined.
No adverse events on mother or babies noted.
There was one grade 3 wound (defined as deep pelvic abscess or evidence of local or generalized peritonitis) in the treatment group as compared with three in the placebo group (classified as serious infectious morbidity).

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Dillon 1981

Methods

Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled; numbered packages randomized by pharmacy; 9/110 'packages' not included (either damaged or patients failed to meet inclusion criteria); imbalance in group size (46‐placebo vs 55‐cefoxitin) not explained.

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section (one third elective).
Exclusion: evidence of active infection, penicillin or cephalosporin allergy; recent antibiotic treatment.
Setting: Children's Hospital of Buffalo, USA; women enrolled between September 1979 and April 1980.

Interventions

Cefoxitin 2g IV (n = 46) versus saline placebo (n = 55) after clamping the umbilical cord and at 4 and 10 hours post‐operatively.

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (temperature >38 degrees C twice 6 hours apart after first 24 hours); endometritis (fever, uterine tenderness, leukocytosis); wound infection (fever, cellulitis, exudate); maternal length of stay.

Notes

No serious life‐threatening infection in either group; no drug‐related side‐effects.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Duff 1980

Methods

Double‐blind, randomized, prepared by hospital pharmacy; placebo‐controlled.
23/80 excluded because of errors in dispensation of medication.

Participants

All women undergoing either primary or repeat cesarean section (44% elective).
Exclusion: penicillin allergy; chorioamnionitis prior to surgery.
Setting: Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington DC; October 1976 and March 1977.

Interventions

Ampicillin 1g IV prior to surgery and 6 and 12 hours post‐operatively (n = 26) versus placebo (n = 31).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (>100.3 degrees fahrenheit twice 6 hours apart after first 24 hours); endomyometritis (fever, uterine and abdominal tenderness, purulent lochia); urinary tract infection (positive culture); wound infection (induration, erythema and warmth with purulent drainage); need for antibiotics (treatment 3/26 vs placebo 13/31); maternal hospital stay (6.03 vs 6.9; no variance given).

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Duff 1982

Methods

Randomized in double‐blind fashion; placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section who were not in labor and did not have ruptured membranes (elective).
Setting: Washington, DC. US
From January 1970 to June 1980.

Interventions

Ampicillin 1g 30 min prior to surgery and at 4 and 8 hours post‐operatively (n = 42) versus placebo solution (n = 40).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (>100.4 degrees fahrenheit twice 6 hours apart after the first 24 hours); endomyometritis (fever, uterine and adnexal tenderness, purulent lochia); urinary tract infection; wound infection (induration, erythema and warmth with purulent drainage); need for antibiotics (treatment 1/42 vs placebo 6/40); maternal hospital stay (4.3 vs 4.6; no variance given).

Notes

No life‐threatening infection related complications nor bacteremic episodes in either group.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Elliott 1986

Methods

Randomized, using a table of random numbers; not placebo‐controlled. Allocated to either intravenous antibiotic, antibiotic irrigation, both routes or no treatment.

Participants

Women in active labor or ruptured membranes and at least one digital vaginal examination (categorized as non‐elective in this review although duration of membrane rupture not stated).
Exclusion: allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin, fever >37.7 degrees C with suspicion of chorioamnionitis; antibiotic use within two weeks.
Setting: Letterman Army Medical Center, California; Womack Army Community Hospital, North Carolina.

Interventions

Cefoxitin 2g IV after clamping the cord, repeated every six hours for 48 hours (n = 39) versus uterine and peritoneal lavage with 2g cefoxitin after delivery of the placenta (n = 42) versus irrigation plus intravenous therapy (n = 38) versus no therapy (n = 39). The three treatment groups have been combined in this review.

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (>37.9 degrees C twice 6 hours apart after first 24 hours); endometritis (fever and uterine tenderness); urinary tract infection (positive culture); wound infection (including fever, cellulitis and exudate); hospital stay (treatment 4.86 vs control 5.2; variance could not be calculated).

Notes

3 episodes of septicemia reported in control group vs none in treatment groups.
No antibiotic reactions reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Engel 1984

Methods

Assigned at random to either a control group or the study group by computer‐generated list of random numbers; not placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section. Exclusion criteria: severe penicillin allergy, renal insufficiency, antibiotic use, amniotic infection.
Setting: Nordwest Hospital, Frankfurt, West Germany.

Interventions

Mezlocillin 4g and oxacillin 2g every 8 hours after clamping of the cord for three doses (n = 50) vs no treatment (n = 50).

Outcomes

Endometritis, urinary tract infections, wound infections.

Notes

Detailed pre‐ and post‐ antibiotic microbiological cultures were performed; there were fewer gram positive cocci and more gram negative rods in cervical cultures of the treated group; more break‐through infections in the treated group were with mezlocillin‐resistant organisms.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Escobedo 1991

Methods

Double blind, randomized by computerized tables; matching placebo doses; 3 patients excluded for inadequate follow‐up (group allocation not provided).

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section (labor <12 hours, membrane rupture <12 hours, <7 vaginal exams).
Exclusion: any antibiotic within 2 weeks, fever, clinical evidence of infection.
Setting: Mexico.

Interventions

Ampicillin 1g intravenously every six hours x 3 then 1g every 6 hours x 7 days (n = 23) vs ampicillin 1g every 6 hours x 3 doses then placebo (n = 37) vs placebo (n = 31).

Outcomes

Fever >38 degrees C x 2 at least 6 hours apart after first 24 hours; endometritis (temperature >38 degrees C, purulent lochia, pain on internal examination); wound infection (increased warmth, size or colour of wound, or purulent secretions); urine infection (dysuria and positive culture).

Notes

No explanation provided for unequal size groups.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Fugere 1983

Methods

Randomized (number allocated randomly to each of 90 boxes) placebo‐controlled (coloured vitamin added to placebo solution), double blind.

Participants

Women undergoing non‐elective cesarean section.
Exclusion: not in labour with intact membranes, allergy to cephalosporins, antibiotic use within 48 hours, fever, ruptured membranes for >36 hours.
Setting: Hopital Saint‐Luc, Montreal, Canada; September 1980 to November 1981.

Interventions

Cefoxitin 2g IV (n = 30) versus cefazolin 1g IV (n = 30) versus placebo (n = 30) at clamping of the cord and at 6 and 12 hours later. Both treatment groups have been combined.

Outcomes

Endometritis, wound infection, urinary tract infection (symptoms or two successive positive cultures) septicemia, pelvic abscess, pelvic thrombophlebitis. Follow‐up at 6 weeks. No side effects observed.

Notes

There were no serious infections in any of the groups.
In the placebo and cefazolin groups there was no increase in aerobic bacterial colonization of the cervix after 4 days but there was an increase in colonization by anaerobes; the opposite occurred in the group receiving cefoxitin.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Gall 1979

Methods

Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled.

Participants

All women undergoing either a repeat cesarean section or in labor.
Exclusion: clinical infection, ruptured membranes for >12 hours, prior antibiotics within 48 hours, renal or hepatic disease.
Setting: North Carolina, US.

Interventions

Cefazolin 1g intramuscularly pre‐operatively and cephalothin 2g intravenously at 6, 12, and 24 hours after first dose (n = 46) versus placebo (n = 49).

Outcomes

Wound infection (cellulitis, purulent exudate, intraperitoneal abscess or peritonitis); endometritis; urinary tract infection; maternal hospital stay.

Notes

No minor side‐effects (rash or pruritus) or major reactions (anaphylaxis) observed.
4 patients (all in control group) had septicemia [counted as serious morbidity].

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Ganesh 1986

Methods

'Randomly divided'; no further details; placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women < 21 years old undergoing cesarean section.
Exclusion: antibiotic use within 2 weeks; active infection or fever at delivery; penicillin or sulfa allergy; internal fetal monitoring.
Setting: University Hospital, New Jersey; November 1983 and December 1984; lower socioeconomic class (90% black).

Interventions

Trimethoprim 240mg and sulfamethoxazole 1200mg intravenously after clamping of cord (n = 29) versus placebo (n = 28).

Outcomes

Endomyometritis (fever [>100.3 degrees fahrenheit twice within 24 hours after first day], uterine tenderness, absence of another focus); urinary tract infection (fever and positive culture); wound infection (fever, abnormal appearing wound with cellulitis or a wound draining purulent material).

Notes

Authors' definition of high risk not comparable with that used in this review.
The incidence of urinary tract infection and wound infection was similar between the groups (numbers not given).

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Gerstner 1980

Methods

Women randomized (no further details provided in translation); not placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section.
Setting: Universitats‐Frauenklinik Wien, Austria; August 1979 and April 1980.

Interventions

Metronidazole (n = 53) versus no treatment (n = 50).

Outcomes

Fever (>38 degrees C on two subsequent days); wound infection; endometritis; additional use of antibiotics (treatment 13/53 vs control 22/50); maternal hospital days.

Notes

Full translation pending.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Gibbs 1972

Methods

Random allocation is presumed although method not described; placebo‐controlled; antibiotics prepared in coded identical vials by pharmacy; 17 patients initially randomized not included in outcome (? all in the treatment group).

Participants

Women undergoing primary cesarean section or repeat section.
Exclusion: penicillin allergy, fever in labor.
Setting: University of Pennsylvania; November 1971 and April 1972.

Interventions

Ampicillin 1g, methicillin 1g and kanamycin 0.5g intramuscularly 15 ‐ 30 minutes before, and at 2 and 8 hours after delivery (n = 33) versus placebo (n = 28).

Outcomes

Endometritis (fever and uterine tenderness or fever and pathogenic organism without other cause); urinary tract infection; wound infection (fever, cellulitis and exudate); morbidity [fever >100 degrees fahrenheit in two separate 24 hour periods after first post‐partum day or positive post‐operative urine culture of >100,000 colonies/ml] (treatment 9/33 vs placebo 17/28); maternal hospital stay (6.5 vs 6.9 days; no variance given).

Notes

Two serious infections: one pelvic abscess in treatment group, one septicemia in placebo group.
Authors' definitions of repeat and primary section not comparable to those used for elective/non‐elective in this review.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Gibbs 1973

Methods

Randomized (although method not described); placebo‐controlled; antibiotics prepared in coded identical vials by pharmacy.

Participants

Women undergoing primary cesarean section or repeat section.
Exclusion: penicillin allergy, fever in labor, errors in giving medication.
Setting: University of Pennsylvania; August 1972 and February 1973.

Interventions

Ampicillin 1g and kanamycin 0.5g intramuscularly 15 to 30 minutes before, and at 2 and 8 hours after delivery (n = 34) versus placebo (n = 34).

Outcomes

Endometritis (fever and uterine tenderness or fever and pathogenic organism without other cause); urinary tract infection; wound infection (fever, cellulitis and exudate; any grade); morbidity [fever >100 degrees fahrenheit in two separate 24 hour periods after first post‐partum day or positive post‐operative urine culture of >100,000 colonies/ml] (treatment 8/34 vs placebo 22/34).

Notes

One pelvic abscess in placebo group.
Authors' definitions of repeat and primary section not comparable to those used for elective/non‐elective in this review, categorized as 'both'.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Gibbs 1981

Methods

'Randomized, double‐blind', details not specified; placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women in labor with rupture of membranes (non‐elective).
Exclusion: infection, antibiotics within prior 3 days, allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin; no consent.
Setting: Robert B Green Memorial Hospital, Texas, US; October 1978 and July 1979; patients indigent and predominantly Mexican‐American.

Interventions

Cefamandole 2 g IV after cord clamping, and at 4 and 8 hours post‐operatively (n = 50) versus identical appearing placebo (n = 50).

Outcomes

Endomyo(para)metritis; wound infection; maternal hospital stay; records reviewed 6 weeks to 6 months after discharge. Four episodes of bacteremia (1 in treatment group, 3 in placebo) have been categorized as serious outcomes.

Notes

No incidence of pelvic abscess or septic thrombophlebitis in either group.
Increase in Enterobacteriacae and enterococci and decrease in gram positive anaerobes and nonpathogens in prophylactic group.
No adverse clinical or laboratory results attributable to treatment.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Gordon 1979

Methods

'At random'; not placebo‐controlled, not double‐blind; investigator not intimately involved with post‐operative care.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section.
Exclusion: emergency section, penicillin allergy, fever >38 degrees C, on antibiotics; declined to participate.
Setting: San Bernadino county and University of California at Los Angeles Medical Centers; primarily indigent cases; enrolment started November 1976.

Interventions

Ampicillin 1g IV 15‐30 minutes before surgery and at 2 and 8 hours post‐operatively (n = 38) versus ampicillin 1g IV immediately after cord clamping and at 2 and 8 hours post‐operatively (n = 40) versus no antibiotic (n = 36); results for both treatment groups combined.

Outcomes

Endometritis; wound infection; urinary tract infection; maternal hospital stay (5.1 and 4.7 for pre‐ and post‐ administration of antibiotics respectively vs 6.0 for no treatment, variance not given).

Notes

Although emergency cesarean sections were excluded, the women enrolled did not conform to our definition of an elective section.
Information on neonatal morbidity collected; there were two infants with definite infections in mothers who received no antibiotics and one infection in an infant where antibiotics were given after cord clamping.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Gummerus 1984

Methods

'Randomly divided' (no details provided); placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section; elective cesarean sections not included but definition not provided.
Exclusion: antibiotics prior to procedure.
Setting: School of Midwifery, Helsinki, Finland.
Patients enrolled from December 1981 to August 1982.

Interventions

Metronidazole 500mg intravenously after cutting of cord (n = 109) vs placebo (n = 110).

Outcomes

Wound infection, endometritis.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Hager 1983

Methods

Randomized, double‐blind manner, according to prenumbered envelopes maintained in the central pharmacy; placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing primary, nonelective cesarean section (while it appears most women were in labour and/or had ruptured membranes it is unclear whether all patients fulfilled our criteria for non‐elective).
Exclusion: antibiotic use within 7 days, penicillin or cephalosporin allergy.
Setting: Central Baptist Hospital, Lexington, Kentucky, US.

Interventions

Cefamandole 500mg IV immediately after the cord was clamped, again in the recovery room and two more doses 6 hours apart (n = 43) versus identical‐appearing placebo (n = 47).

Outcomes

Infectious morbidity (fever >100.3 degrees fahrenheit twice 6 hours apart after first 24 hours); endomyometritis (fever, uterine tenderness, and positive culture from endometrium); wound infection, urinary tract infection; maternal duration of stay (treatment 5.1 days vs placebo 5.4; not significant, no variance given).

Notes

There was one episode of bacteremia in the control group.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Hagglund 1989

Methods

Double‐blind, randomized (method not described); placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing emergency cesarean section (during labor and/or after rupture of membranes).
Exclusion: fever >38 degrees C, given antibiotics, chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy in prior 3 weeks, allergy to cephalosporins, alcohol or drug abuse, chronic disease of cardiovascular, renal, hepatic or gastrointestinal system, severe anemia.
Setting: University Hospital, Lund Sweden, July 1983 and December 1986.

Interventions

Cefuroxime 1.5g IV at the start of the operation and 12 hours later (n = 80) versus saline placebo (n = 80).

Outcomes

Endometritis (fever >38 degrees C twice at least 1 hour apart, after the first post‐operative day, and increased tenderness of the uterus); wound infection (redness, tenderness, increased heat and edema of wound); urinary tract infection.

Notes

There were no cases of septicemia or abscess formation observed in either group.
Only 55% of women had ruptured membranes (number >6 hours not stated) and 77% were in labor; these definitions do not meet our criteria for non‐elective section, categorized as 'both'.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Harger 1981

Methods

Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled; 'according to a random schedule'.
10/396 women initially randomized not included in final analysis (errors in protocol, two allergic to penicillin after first dose given and 2, who received cefoxitin, for infusion‐related reactions); insufficient data provided to perform intent to treat analysis.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section after labor or rupture of membranes (method section unclear as to duration of ruptured membranes; it has been assumed that all women were in labor).
Exclusion: elective cesarean section without labor; already receiving antibiotics; fever or other evidence of infection; allergy to penicillin or cephalosporins; requiring endocarditis prophylaxis.
Setting: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US.

Interventions

Cefoxitin 2g intravenously after cord clamping, and at 6 and 12 hours after initial dose (n = 196) versus matching mannitol and riboflavin placebo (n = 196).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (fever >37.9 degrees C twice at least 4 hours apart after first post‐operative day); endomyometritis (fever >38 degrees C with uterine tenderness, maternal white blood cell count >15000/cu mm, malodorous lochia and no apparent cause for fever); urinary tract infection; incision infection (purulent drainage with induration and tenderness); additional antibiotic therapy (treatment 26/196 vs placebo 68/190).

Notes

Increase in enterococci and decrease in Staphylococcus aureus, various streptococci, E. coli and a variety of anaerobes from infected sites in prophylactic group compared with placebo.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Hawrylyshyn 1983

Methods

Randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled.
7 patients initially randomized excluded from analysis: 1 because of an error in drug administration and six because they became febrile and were treated within 8 hours of operation; insufficient data provided to perform intent‐to‐treat analysis.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section (at 'high' risk because of ruptured membranes in active labor); classified as 'non‐elective'.
Exclusion: febrile, antibiotic use in prior 24 hours; allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin; significant hepatic or renal disease.
Setting: Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada, July 1980‐June 1981.
Predominantly private, middle‐class and in their late 20s.

Interventions

Cefoxitin 2g intravenously at time of cord clamping (n = 64) versus cefoxitin 2g at time of cord clamping and at 4 and 8 hours post‐operatively (n = 60) versus identical‐appearing placebo; both treatment groups combined in this analysis.

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (>38 degrees C twice at least 8 hours apart, after first post‐operative day); endometritis (fever, foul, excessive lochia or uterine tenderness); urinary tract infection (fever and positive culture); wound infection (fever, cellulitis or exudate with positive cultures).

Notes

No adverse drug reactions in cefoxitin groups, no septicemia in any group; four patients in placebo group were considered seriously ill (although do not fit the criteria for serious morbidity in this review) compared to none in treatment groups.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Ismail 1990

Methods

Double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Undergoing cesarean section.
Exclusion: preoperative fever, antibiotics within one week, membranes ruptured >36 hours, evidence of chorioamnionitis, penicillin or cephalosporin allergy.
Setting: University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, US (large, inner city hospital); majority of subjects black (40%) or Hispanic (60%).

Interventions

Cefoxitin 2g after cord clamped and at 4 and 8 hours (n = 74) versus placebo (n = 78).

Outcomes

Endometritis (fever and uterine tenderness or fever and pathologic organism without other focus); wound infection (fever, cellulitis and exudate); urinary tract infection (fever and symptoms or positive culture).

Notes

In the placebo group there were 8 episodes of serious morbidity (6 cases of sepsis; one pelvic abscess; one episode of pelvic thrombophlebitis) compared with one in the treated group (one episode of sepsis).
Routine post‐operative cultures were performed: enterococci were isolated from 30/68 cases who received cefoxitin vs 15/74 who received placebo; there was no change in the rate of cefoxitin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae from the stool after prophylaxis.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Jaffe 1985

Methods

Randomly assigned (method not stated); placebo controlled.
It is unclear whether all patients randomized were included in the analysis.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section.
Exclusion: women with active infection, allergy to penicillin and antibiotic treatment within 2 weeks.
Setting: Kfar‐Sava, Israel.

Interventions

Mezlocillin 5g intravenously during 30 minutes prior to surgery (n = 38) vs placebo (n = 40).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (>38 degrees C twice at least 4 hours apart after first 24 hours post‐operative); endometritis (fever and uterine tenderness); urinary tract infection (single culture of >100,000 bacteria/ml); wound infection (redness, cellulitis, tenderness and exudate from incision).

Notes

Authors' definition of emergency not consistent with definitions used in this review (classified as 'both/undefined').

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Jakobi 1994

Methods

Randomized by computer program to one of two groups at time of their first antenatal visit; not placebo‐controlled.
Imbalance in group size not accounted for.

Participants

Low risk women requiring cesarean delivery (elective procedure, duration of membrane rupture <3 hours, no more than two vaginal examinations).
Exclusion: required a drug other than cefazolin for prophylaxis, fever, membrane rupture >24 hours.
Setting: Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.

Interventions

Cefazolin 1g after clamping of the cord (n = 167) versus no treatment (n = 140).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (fever >37.7 degrees C twice at least 4 hours apart after first 24 hours); endometritis (fever, uterine tenderness and abnormal lochia); urinary tract infection (fever and positive culture); wound infection (fever, cellulitis or exudate with positive culture); therapeutic antibiotic use (treatment group 6.5% versus 20% in control group, p <0.001).

Notes

Although some women were in labour at the time of the procedure (mean duration of labour 53 and 44 minutes in the two groups), the study population so closely resembles the criteria for elective cesarean section used in this review that the results have been included in the 'elective' category.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Karhunen 1985

Methods

'Randomized according to a code'; placebo‐controlled. 8 women excluded: 4 because they were febrile before the operation, four because of mistakes in administration; data not provided to perform intent to treat analysis.

Participants

Initially all women undergoing cesarean section (n = 80); thereafter women undergoing non‐elective (ruptured membranes) section (n = 72).
Setting: South Saimaa Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland, May 1982‐August 1983.

Interventions

Tinidazole 500mg IV at cord clamping (n = 75) versus identical placebo (n = 77).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (>38 degrees C on 2 postoperative days, excluding the first); endometritis (fever, foul lochia or uterine tenderness); wound infection (fever, cellulitis or exudate); urinary tract infection (fever and positive culture).

Notes

Authors' definition of non‐elective (ruptured membranes) and elective (unruptured membranes) not consistent with the definitions used in this review; classified in this review as 'both'.
Newborn infants observed for effects of tinidazole (although data not given).

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Kellum 1985

Methods

Randomized by last digit of hospital admission number to no irrigation, antibiotic irrigation or saline irrigation (placebo‐controlled). As the objective of this review is to compare antibiotic with no antibiotic, rather than the effect of irrigation, the two irrigation groups are compared.
Follow‐up given for only 77/84 of treatment and 53/86 of placebo group for outcome of serious infection, without explanation; intent to treat analysis has been performed.

Participants

Women undergoing nonelective cesarean section (including prolonged ruptured membranes and prolonged labor, as well as general risk factors such as poor nutrition and poverty).
Exclusion: current antibiotics, known infectious process, allergy to cephalosporins.
Setting: University of Mississippi Medical Center, September 1982‐September 1983.

Interventions

Cefamandole 2g in 800ml saline irrigation during the procedure (n = 84) versus saline irrigation (n = 86) versus no treatment (n = 92); only first two groups included.

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (>100.6 degrees fahrenheit twice 6 hours apart after first post‐operative day); serious morbidity (fever and endomyometritis or abscess requiring IV antibiotics for resolution).

Notes

Authors' definition of high risk does not correspond to that used for non‐elective in this review, classified as 'both'.
The outcome of serious morbidity included endomyometritis and is classified as endometritis in this review.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

High risk

C ‐ Inadequate

Kreutner 1978

Methods

'Random allocation', placebo controlled.
6 women initially randomized not included in analysis (non‐adherence or noninfectious complications).

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section (51/97 not in labor; 61/97 without ruptured membranes).
Exclusion: signs of infection, allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin, antibiotics within 2 weeks; lack of consent.
Setting: Medical University Hospital of South Carolina; November 1975‐June 1976.

Interventions

Cefazolin 1g IV pre‐operatively and at 2 and 8 hours post‐operatively (n = 48) versus similar volume of placebo (n = 49).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (>100.3 degrees fahrenheit twice on any of first 10 post‐partum days after the first); endometritis (fever and uterine tenderness, or fever and pathogen from endometrium without other cause); urinary tract infection (fever or positive culture and symptoms); wound infection (fever, cellulitis and/or exudate).

Notes

Aerobic isolates unchanged, fewer anaerobes in patients given placebo; most pathogens isolated were resistant to cefazolin whether treatment or placebo given.
There were two episodes of septicemia (both in placebo group).

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Kristensen 1990

Methods

'Randomly allocated' using envelope containing empty vial or vial containing treatment; not placebo‐controlled; women, attending physicians and study coordinators were 'blind'.

Participants

Women undergoing nonelective cesarean section (58/201 without labour; 65/201 without ruptured membranes).
Exclusion: fever, antibiotics within 7 days, penicillin or cephalosporin allergy.
Setting: Odense University Hospital, Denmark, February 1987‐March 1988.

Interventions

Cefuroxime 750mg IV after cord clamping (n = 102) versus no treatment (n = 99).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (>37.9 degrees C twice at least 6 hours apart after first post‐operative day); endometritis (fever, uterine tenderness and abnormal lochia); wound infection (fever, cellulitis and/or purulent discharge); urinary tract infection; cost of post‐operative antibiotics (treatment $US0.69 vs control $US7.47); maternal hospital stay (treatment 8.1 vs control 8.0, no variance given).

Notes

No woman had a severe infection such as pelvic abscess or septic pelvic thrombophlebitis.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Lapas 1988

Methods

Double blind, placebo controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing elective or non‐elective cesarean section. Age range 17‐40 years.
Exclusion criteria: allergy to metronidazole, amnionitis, and pyrexia.
Setting: Athens, Greece.

Interventions

Metronidazole 500mg intravenously 2 hours or immediately preoperatively, 500 mg intraoperatively, 1000mg 8 hours postoperatively (n = 50), versus placebo (n = 50).

Outcomes

Wound infection; endometritis; inadequate wound healing (metronidazole 1/50 vs placebo 8/50); mean temperature (36.8 degrees C SD 1.02 vs 37.6, 1.03); duration of hospital stay.

Notes

Language: Bulgarian.
Although the authors are not identical and the presentation of the data makes direct comparisons difficult, the description of the two studies cited is so similar that it is presumed the two citations refer to the same patient population.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Leonetti 1989

Methods

'Randomly divided'; blinded, placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing primary cesarean section after onset of labour (corresponds to the definition of non‐elective).
Exclusion: febrile or infected, allergy to pipericillin.
Setting: Jersey City Medical Center, New Jersey; predominantly lower socio‐economic indigent women.

Interventions

Pipericillin 4g peri‐operatively (n = 50) versus pipericillin 4g peri‐operatively and at 4 and 8 hours post‐operatively (n = 50) versus placebo (n = 50); both treatment groups combined in analysis.

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (> 38.0 degrees C twice at least 6 hours apart after first post‐operative day); endometritis (fever, tender uterus and purulent lochia); hospital stay (no significant difference, variance not given).

Notes

Use of saline or antibiotic lavage not allowed
No adverse reactions reported with treatment.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Levin 1983

Methods

Randomized (using lottery method), double‐blind, placebo‐controlled; four women excluded because of protocol deviations.

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section (39/128 repeat section).
Exclusion: fever or infection, allergy to antibiotics.
Setting: Kaiser‐Permanente Medical Center‐Santa Clara, California; February‐June 1982.

Interventions

Cefoxitin 2g in 1L saline irrigation (n = 41) versus cephapirin 2g in 1L saline irrigation (n = 44) versus identical appearing placebo saline irrigation (n = 43) after delivery of the placenta; both treatment groups combined in the analysis.

Outcomes

Urinary tract infection (positive culture); wound infection (purulent wound discharge with or without wound separation); endometritis (fever >100.4 degrees fahrenheit after first post‐operative day, uterine tenderness, foul smelling lochia without other source).

Notes

Follow‐up for 8 weeks.
One patient in placebo group developed septic pelvic thrombophlebitis and septic pulmonary emboli, classified as a serious complication.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Lewis 1990

Methods

Random, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled; results on 15/227 women initially randomized not included in analysis.

Participants

Women undergoing elective and nonelective cesarean section.
Exclusion: antibiotic use within 2 weeks, allergy to penicillin.
Setting: Louisiana State University Hospital; 90% indigent population, July 1985‐January 1986.

Interventions

Ticarcillin 5g in 1200ml saline irrigation (n = 112) versus saline irrigation (n = 100).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (>100.3 degrees fahrenheit twice at least 4 hours apart after first post‐operative day); endomyometritis, wound infection, urinary tract infection, septicemia, maternal hospital stay (treatment 4.5 vs placebo 5.4, no variance given).

Notes

Definition of elective and nonelective cesarean section not provided.
There were 3 episodes of septicemia in those women undergoing emergency section (2 in the control group and one in the placebo group).

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Mahomed 1988

Methods

Randomly allocated (using randomized list of treatment numbers), double‐blind, placebo‐controlled.

Participants

All women undergoing elective cesarean section (before onset of labour or rupture of membranes; corresponds to our definition of elective).
Setting: University of Zimbabwe; patients enrolled between November 1986 and March 1987.

Interventions

Crystalline penicillin 2MU and chloramphenicol 500mg pre‐operatively ( n = 115) versus matching placebo (n = 117).

Outcomes

Fever (>37.9 degrees C twice at least 4 hours apart after first post‐operative day); wound sepsis (graded as abnormal erythema and/or induration, oozing wound without frank pus or pus formation); endomyometritis (fever, uterine tenderness and foul‐smelling lochia), pelvic abscess formation, bacteremia; maternal hospital stay (treatment 5.43 vs placebo 6.18, variance not given).

Notes

No woman developed pelvic abscess nor required a laparotomy.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Mallaret 1990

Methods

Randomized trial 'by drawing of lots', placebo‐controlled.

Participants

'Low risk' women, undergoing cesarean section (27% in labour). Exclusion: allergy to beta‐lactam antibiotics, receipt of antibiotics within 3 days; ruptured membranes >12 hours; fever, amniotic infection.
Setting: Grenoble, France, July 1986‐December 1987.

Interventions

Cefotetan 1g IV at the time of cord clamping (n = 136) versus placebo injection (n = 130).

Outcomes

Endometritis, wound infection, septicemia; additional antibiotic use (10/136 in treatment group vs 19/130 in placebo); antibiotic costs; maternal hospital stay.

Notes

There was one episode of septicemia in the placebo group.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

McCowan 1980

Methods

Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled.

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section (8/73 were repeat).
Exclusion: already on antibiotics.
Setting: National Women's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; June ‐ September 1979.

Interventions

Metronidazole 500mg IV prior to incision and metronidazole 2g suppository at end of surgery (n = 35) versus matching placebo infusion and suppository (n = 38).

Outcomes

Fever (>37.9 degrees C within 14 days of delivery); wound infection, endometritis, urinary tract infection, major complication (return to theatre or hospitalized >10 days because of post‐operative morbidity); need for antibiotic therapy (treatment 13 vs placebo 10); fever index (257 degree hours vs 165 hours).

Notes

One major complication (not infectious) in each group (bleeding from lower segment in one, major deep vein thrombosis extending into iliac veins in another).

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Miller 1968

Methods

'On a random basis'; partly placebo‐controlled.

Participants

All patients undergoing cesarean section.
Women with pre‐existing urinary tract infection were excluded.
Setting: Durban, South Africa.

Interventions

Ampicillin 500mg IM pre‐operatively and 8 hourly for 48 hours followed by 500mg orally 8 hourly for 4 days (n = 150) versus no treatment for first 48 hours then oral placebo 8 hourly for 4 days (n = 150).

Outcomes

Urinary tract infection (culture positive), intra‐uterine infection not defined further, classified as endometritis), wound infection.

Notes

Fewer post‐partum urinary isolates in treated group were sensitive to ampicillin (8/17 vs 18/26).
In the control group, three women developed pelvic abscesses (included as serious morbidity) and one patient required hysterectomy for secondary postpartum haemorrhage following severe E. coli intra‐uterine infection.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Moodley 1981

Methods

Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled (using unmarked code‐numbered separate boxes).

Participants

Women undergoing emergency cesarean section (ruptured membranes for >6 hours and <20 hours; corresponds to our definition of non‐elective).
Exclusion: prior antibiotic therapy, fever >37.2 degrees C, fetal tachycardia of >160/minute.
Setting: University of Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Interventions

Lincomycin 600mg (n = 20) versus metronidazole 500mg (n = 20) versus placebo (n = 20) intravenously 2 hours pre‐operatively and 8 hourly for 48 hours; both treatment groups are combined for the analysis.

Outcomes

Wound discharge/abscess formation, puerperal sepsis (>37.9 degrees C twice in first 48 hours or >37.5 degrees C from 2nd post‐operative day), septicemia, urinary tract infection.

Notes

Authors' definition of puerperal sepsis has been classified as fever.
No complications of drug administration reported in mothers or babies; no rash, diarrhoea nor nausea.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Moro 1974

Methods

Randomized (code generated by pharmacy), double‐blind, placebo‐controlled; code broken when fever developed
14/162 excluded for protocol violations.

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section (49/148 were repeat procedure; 57/148 were not in labour).
Exclusion: membranes ruptured >24 hours.
Setting: Norfold General Hospital, Virginia; both private (n = 70) and clinic (n = 78) women included.

Interventions

Cephalothin 2g IV 15‐30 minutes prior to surgery and 1g every 6 hours for 36 hours, then cephalexin 500mg orally every 6 hours until 5th post‐operative day (n = 74) versus identical appearing placebo (n = 74).

Outcomes

Fever (>100.3 degrees fahrenheit twice after 48 hours); endometritis (fever, uterine tenderness, foul‐smelling or abnormal lochia and positive cultures); urinary tract infection, wound infection; maternal hospital stay (treatment 6.2 vs placebo 7.5, no variance given).

Notes

All bacterial isolates in treatment group were sensitive to cephalothin.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Morrison 1973

Methods

Alternate allocation to treatment or no treatment; not placebo‐controlled.

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section.
Exclusion: febrile or infected.
Setting: City of Memphis Hospitals, Tennessee; indigent women, many obstetric and metabolic complications.

Interventions

Aqueous penicillin 10 MU every 8 hours and kanamycin 500mg IM every 12 hours pre‐operatively and for 3 days post‐operatively (n = 115) versus no treatment (n = 115).

Outcomes

Fever (>100.9 degrees fahrenheit after first post‐operative day), severe pelvic infection (treatment 27% vs control 7%); 'free of infectious morbidity' (3.6 vs 6.8 days); maternal hospital stay (5.4 vs 8.8 days, no variance given).

Notes

No adverse drug reactions reported; no evidence of development of resistance reported.
Unable to ascertain from description of study incidence of endometritis or wound infection; inadequate description of nature of severe pelvic infections (not included as outcome in analysis).
Two groups of women were studied retrospectively (n = 75); methods nor results do not specifically describe results of this group and it is unclear whether they have been included in the overall results.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

High risk

C ‐ Inadequate

Ng 1992

Methods

Randomized to treatment or no treatment (method not described). Two patients excluded (one from cefoperazone group, one from no treatment group); intent to treat analysis performed.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section.
Exclusions: hypersensitivity to one of antibiotics; presence of infection or fever; on antibiotics; multiple pregnancy.
Setting: Ipoh, Malaysia.

Interventions

Cefoperazone 1g every 12 hours x 3 (n = 71) vs ampicillin 500mg every 6 hours x 4 (n = 74) vs no treatment (n = 77); both treatment groups combined for data analysis.

Outcomes

Wound infection (inflammation over wound with serous or purulent discharge); any antibiotics post‐operatively (cefoperazone vs ampicillin vs no treatment: 6.6% vs 16.2% vs 25.7%). Hospital stay: ampicillin vs no treatment 5.57 days (SD 1.43) vs 6.5 days (SD 3.67).

Notes

Author's definition of emergency not consistent with criteria used in this review; classified as both/undefined.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Padilla 1983

Methods

Randomly assigned, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled; medication code kept in pharmacy.

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section (35/71 were a repeat section). The authors definition of primary and repeat are different from those used in this review and have not been analysed separately; most women for repeat section were in early labour at the time the operation was performed.
Exclusion: fever, membrane rupture >24 hours, penicillin allergy, lack of consent.
Setting: Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore.

Interventions

Ampicillin 2g pre‐operatively (n = 34) versus similar‐appearing placebo (n = 37).

Outcomes

Fever (>37.0 degrees C twice at least six hours apart after first post‐operative day); endometritis, urinary tract infection, wound infection, bacteremia, pelvic abscess, maternal hospital stay.

Notes

There was one pelvic abscess in the placebo group; there were 3 episodes of bacteremia (1 Klebsiella spp. in treatment group, 2 group B streptococcal infections in placebo); combined for outcome of serious morbidity.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Phelan 1979

Methods

Randomly assigned, case number known only by pharmacy; placebo‐controlled.
8 women excluded for mistakes in protocol.

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section (46/122 were a repeat section). The authors' definition of primary and repeat do not correspond to definitions of elective and nonelective used in this review (repeat sections included women in labor with ruptured membranes). The results for these two categories have been combined in this review.
Exclusion: allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin, infection or receiving antibiotics.
Setting: Naval Regional Medical Center, Portmouth, Virginia, US, July‐December 1976.

Interventions

Cefazolin 500mg IV 30 minutes before and 500mg at 2 and 1g at 8 hours after delivery (n = 61) versus matching placebo (n = 61).

Outcomes

Endometritis (fever and uterine tenderness or fever and pathogenic organism); urinary tract infection (fever and symptoms, or positive culture); wound infection (fever, cellulitis and exudate); maternal hospital stay (treatment 5.5 days versus placebo 5.7 days, no variance given).

Notes

Two women developed serious complications as stated by the authors: one in treatment group developed septic pelvic thrombophlebitis; one given placebo developed pneumonia and endoparametritis (both included in outcome of serious morbidity).

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Polk 1982

Methods

'Randomly allocated'; double blind; placebo‐controlled.
12 participants withdrawn (8 treatment, 4 placebo); intent to treat analysis performed.

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section (other than repeat section); criteria do not correspond with our definition of non‐elective.
Exclusion: active infection, fever, membranes ruptured >36 hours, antibiotic therapy within 2 weeks, renal disease, allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin.
Setting: Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, US, July 1978‐October 1980.

Interventions

Cefazolin 2g after cord clamped (n = 146) and at 4 and 8 hours after first dose versus matching placebo (n = 132).

Outcomes

Fever (oral temperature >100.3 degrees fahrenheit on any of 2 of first 10 postoperative days); urinary tract infection, wound infection (only pus‐draining included in outcome of wound infection); endometritis (fever, tenderness on pelvic examination, abnormal discharge); pelvic abscess; septic pelvic thrombophlebitis, bacteremia; subsequent antibiotic use (23% for placebo vs 12% for treatment).

Notes

Outcome of fever and minor wound infection combined (11/146 for treatment vs 13/132 for placebo).
Four episodes of bacteremia, all in placebo group.
One episode of rash and one episode of phlebitis reported in treatment group vs none in control.
Data collected at 6 weeks on 259/266 patients; 35% of infections diagnosed after discharge.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Reckel 1985

Methods

Randomized to treatment or no treatment. One drop‐out (no treatment) included in intent to treat analysis.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section.
Setting: Hanover, Germany.

Interventions

Mezlocillin 2g intravenously half hour pre‐operatively then every eight hours x 4 (n = 70) vs no treatment (n = 70).

Outcomes

Wound infection (inflammation with or without exudation); endometritis (fever and tenderness of the uterus or fever with pathogens from the cervical canal); urinary tract infection (>100,000 bacteria/ml).

Notes

One episode of allergic skin reaction occurred with the injection of mezlocillin.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Rehu 1980

Methods

'Assigned at random' to one of three regimens; code kept secret; placebo‐controlled; data from a fourth group that consisted of patients allergic to one of the drugs or undergoing an emergency section have not been included.
Two women excluded after initial randomization.

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section.
Exclusion: allergic to penicillin, clindamycin or gentamicin; emergency section.
Setting: State Maternity Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, September 1977‐January 1978.

Interventions

10 million units benzyl penicillin IV (n = 46) versus 500mg clindamycin IV and 80 mg gentamicin IM (n = 42) versus glucose solution placebo (n = 40) IV by infusion starting 30 minutes before operation and stopping 4 hours after. Results of both treatment groups combined.

Outcomes

Endometritis (fever, uterine tenderness and foul‐smelling vaginal discharge); wound infection (all grades combined); hospital stay (treatment 7.7 vs 7.7 placebo; no variance given).

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Rizk 1998

Methods

Randomized using computer‐generated number screen; not placebo controlled, but patient and study co‐ordinators unaware of group allocation.

Participants

Women undergoing elective cesarean section (absence of labor and before rupture of membranes).
Exclusion: allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin, prior antibiotic therapy within 7 days.
Setting: United Arab Emirates.

Interventions

Cefuroxime 1.5g after clamping of the cord vs no treatment.

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (temperature of >38 degrees C after first 48 hours); endometritis (uterine tenderness and offensive lochia with fever and no other source); wound infection (erythema, induration or purulent discharge); urinary tract infection (>100,000 bacteria/ml).

Notes

Majority of patients were indigent; follow‐up at 6 weeks.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Roex 1986

Methods

'Randomly allocated'; placebo‐controlled.
8 women excluded because of protocol failures and 9 women for intraoperative complications (not defined further).

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section (77/129 were elective sections).
Exclusion: active infection, antibiotics within 7 days, allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin, impaired liver or renal function.
Setting: Academisch Ziekenhuis der Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 1983‐October 1984.

Interventions

Cefoxitin 2g (n = 64) versus matching placebo (n = 65) IV bolus immediately following clamping of the cord and at 6 and 12 hours later.

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (>38 degrees C for at least 24 hr after first 24 hr); endometritis (fever, fetid lochia and/or uterine tenderness on pelvic examination); wound infection (palpable induration, wound dehiscence and/or pus drained); urinary tract infection (positive culture), bacteremia.

Notes

One episode of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (in cefoxitin group) not considered life‐threatening (included in outcome of serious morbidity). No serious antibiotic side‐effects reported in cefoxitin‐treated group; one patient in cefoxitin group developed diarrhoea.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Ross 1984

Methods

'Randomized, sequential basis'; placebo controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing emergency cesarean section (in active labour with membrane rupture).
Exclusion: pyrexia; antibiotic use within 2 weeks.
Setting: Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Interventions

Metronidazole 500mg (n = 57) versus placebo (n = 58) IV infusion at start of procedure; postoperatively metronidazole or placebo suppository twice daily for 5 days.

Outcomes

Pyrexia (>38 degrees C twice 4 hours apart after first 24 hours); wound infection; endometritis (heavy, offensive lochia and pyrexia); urinary tract infection; antibiotic use (15/57 in treatment group vs 20/58 in control group).

Notes

One woman in the control group developed a pelvic abscess.
Length of admission not significantly different between the two groups (mean 7.4, sd 2.3 days).
No adverse reactions occurred.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Rothbard 1975

Methods

Randomized using last digit of hospital chart: even to treatment, odd to no treatment (not placebo‐controlled).

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section (divided into "no labour" and "labor" groups which correspond to the definitions of elective/non‐elective used in this review.
Exclusion: fever, antibiotic use within 2 weeks, ruptured membranes >2 hours, major penicillin allergy.
Setting: New York Medical College, New York, US.

Interventions

Cephalothin 2g IV and kanamycin 1g IM at induction of anesthesia, then cephalothin 2g IV q6hrs x 8 doses and kanamycin 500mg IM q12hr x 4 doses (n = 47) versus no treatment (n = 53).

Outcomes

Endometritis (fever, uterine tenderness and positive culture or fever and pathogenic organism); urinary tract infection, wound infection (fever and cellulitis or exudate).
Data available on elective (defined as no labor) and non‐elective (defined as presence of labour).

Notes

No difference in average duration of hospital stay between groups (data not shown).
One woman (treatment group) developed endometritis with organism resistant to cephalothin and kanamycin.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

High risk

C ‐ Inadequate

Rouzi 2000

Methods

Randomized using computer‐generated code, kept confidential, to treatment or identical placebo.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section (both elective and emergency).
Exclusions: use of antibiotics, fever or signs of infection; allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin.
Setting: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Interventions

Cefazolin 1g after clamping of the cord (n = 221) vs matching placebo (n = 220).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (>38 degrees C twice 4 hours apart after first 24 hours); endometritis (fever, uterine tenderness and abnormal lochia); wound infection (fever, cellulitis or exudate with positive culture); urinary tract infection (fever and positive urine culture); pneumonia, bacteremia, pelvic abscess, unexplained fever, therapeutic antibiotics, length of post‐operative stay.

Notes

Emergency cesarean section not defined, results reported in undefined category.
Fetal outcomes reported; no serious side effects with cefazolin.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Rudd 1981

Methods

Randomly allocated using table of random numbers by pharmacy to one of three groups (antibiotic irrigation, placebo irrigation, no irrigation); vitamin solution added to make placebo visually identical; physicians and patients blinded to treatment.

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section (19/60 women had ruptured membranes >6 hours; 40/60 were in active labour).
Exclusion: known infection, currently on antibiotics, allergic to penicillin or cephalosporin.
Setting: Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, US.

Interventions

Cefamandole 2g in 800ml normal saline irrigation (n = 30) versus irrigation with 800 ml normal saline (n = 30). Non‐irrigation control group (n = 30) not included.

Outcomes

Endomyometritis (fever, unusual uterine and parametrial tenderness without evidence of other source of infection); maternal length of stay.

Notes

Length of hospital stay for the control group included results from both the no irrigation group and the placebo irrigation group (5.37 days vs 4.53 for treatment group).

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Ruiz‐Moreno 1991

Methods

Randomized, placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women in active labor undergoing cesarean section.
Exclusion: Elective cesarean section, evidence of infection, antibiotic use within 8 days, metronidazole intolerance, lack of consent.
Setting:Hospital Central Militar, Mexico city, Mexico.
Women predominantly (78%) of low socioeconomic level.

Interventions

Metronidazole 1g IV (n = 50) versus identical appearing placebo (n = 50) immediately after cord clamping.

Outcomes

Endometritis (purulent and/or foul odor lochia); wound infection (wound edges tender, red and swollen, or frank pus or sanguino‐purulent material exuded); urinary tract infection (bacteria seen in sediment) ; maternal hospital stay.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Saltzman 1985

Methods

Randomized, double‐blind, placebo controlled.
One woman initially randomized not included in analysis.

Participants

High risk women undergoing cesarean section (in active labour and/or ruptured membranes >4hours); classified as non‐elective in this review.
Exclusion: active infection, fever, antibiotic use within 3 days, allergy to penicillin or cephalosporins.
Setting: Fairfax Hospital, Virginia, US.
Women predominantly private.

Interventions

Ceftizoxime 2g (n = 50) versus placebo (n = 49) IV at time of cord clamping.

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (oral temperature >37.9 degrees C twice at least 8 hr apart, after first 24 hr); endometritis (fever and foul lochia or uterine tenderness); urinary tract infection (fever and positive culture); wound infection (fever, abnormal‐looking wound, surrounded by cellulitis and/or draining purulent material).

Notes

Ceftizoxime is a third generation cephalosporin with broad aerobic and anaerobic activity.
There was one drug reaction (maculopapular rash) in the treatment group.
Women followed up at 6 weeks.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Sanchez‐Ramos 1999

Methods

Double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean deliveries for various indications.
Setting: Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

Interventions

Metronidazole gel 5g intravaginally (n = 31) vs matching placebo (n = 32).

Outcomes

Endometritis.

Notes

Abstract only.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Scarpignato 1982

Methods

Randomly assigned; not placebo controlled.
One woman was excluded because of an allergic reaction to cefuroxime (included in intent to treat analysis).

Participants

Women undergoing emergency cesarean section (58/60 women in spontaneous labor; classified as non‐elective).
Exclusion: allergy to penicillin or cephalosporins; severe renal disease, history of pelvic infections.
Setting: University of Parma, Parma, Italy, November 1981‐March 1982.

Interventions

Cefuroxime 750mg IM 30‐60 minutes before surgery and 8 and 16 hours after (short term)(n = 20) versus 750mg three times a day for five days (first dose being given post‐operatively after the woman had returned to the ward) (long term) (n = 20) versus no treatment (n = 20). The results of both treatment groups have been combined.

Outcomes

Fever (>100.3 degrees fahrenheit twice 6 hr apart); endometritis (fever and uterine tenderness); maternal stay (treatment 7.1 vs control 7.9 days, no variance given).

Notes

Note: the group given long‐term prophylaxis received the first dose after return to the ward.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Schedvins 1986

Methods

'Randomly referred'; not placebo controlled.

Participants

Women with rupture of membranes for >6 hours (equivalent to non‐elective group).
Exclusion: fever or foul smell of amniotic fluid.
Setting: Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden, November 1983‐October 1984.

Interventions

Cefuroxime 1.5g IV q8hr for 24 hours, starting immediately before or during the operation, followed by oral cefadroxil 500mg twice daily for 6 days (n = 26) versus no treatment (n = 27).

Outcomes

Endometritis (marked uterine tenderness with or without a foul discharge with fever at least twice); wound infection (redness, tenderness, induration and pus in the wound); urinary tract infection (positive culture).

Notes

Data provided (but not included) for a second control group eligible for inclusion but not randomized.
Numbers not provided to calculate mean maternal length of stay for the two randomized groups.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Shah 1998

Methods

Randomized using consecutively numbered. sealed envelopes to treatment groups or no treatment. 14 patients excluded from study (8/147 from treatment groups, 6/51 from control group); included in intent to treat analysis.

Participants

Women undergoing elective caesarean section. Exclusion: hypersensitivity to penicillin or cephalosporin; prior antibiotic therapy within 3 days; hepatorenal insufficiency; positive cultures or definite evidence of infection.
Setting: United Arab Emirates.

Interventions

Pipericillin 4g intravenously after the cord was clamped (n = 48) vs cephadrine 500mg plus metronidazole 500mg both intravenously after the cord was clamped and every 8 hours x 2 (n = 47) vs pipericillin 2g intravenously after clamping of the cord and 2g every 8 hours x 2 (n = 52) vs no treatment (n = 51).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (fever >38 degrees C twice 4 hours apart after first day); endometritis (uterine and parametrial tenderness, foul smelling vaginal discharge); wound infection (local induration and tenderness with wound exudate).

Notes

Three patients who developed drug reactions were excluded from study (one from each of the treatment groups). Late morbidity evaluated at 4‐6 weeks.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Stage 1982

Methods

Randomly allocated (individually randomized block ensuring two‐to‐one randomization at each centre); placebo‐controlled; women and investigators blind to allocation throughout the study.
Part of a larger study looking at prophylaxis also in gynecologic surgery; drop‐outs in cesarean section women not stated (overall: 11/319 from treated group, 8/172 from placebo group.

Participants

All women undergoing cesarean section (46% in labor).
Exclusion: infection, allergy to penicillin or cephalosporins.
Setting: 14 US centers, July 1976‐June 1978.

Interventions

Cephradine 1g IV (n = 133) versus placebo (n = 66) within 1 hour prior to surgery, repeated at 4 hours.

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (oral temperature >37.7 degrees C twice 4 hours apart, after first 48 hours); endometritis (uterine tenderness, fever and purulent discharge), wound infection (increased local tenderness, redness or swelling); urinary tract infection (positive culture); maternal length of stay (treatment 5.8 days vs placebo 7.57 days; p<0.05, variance not given).

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Stiver 1983

Methods

Randomly assigned, placebo‐controlled.
7 women (one in treatment, six in placebo group) initially randomized but results not included, 6 because they failed to receive all 3 doses, one because of hypotensive episode with first dose; intent to treat analysis performed.

Participants

All women in labour or with ruptured membranes (duration of ruptured membranes not stated; mean duration 9.97 hours; included in non‐elective category).
Setting: 5 centres in Canada.

Interventions

Cefoxitin 2g (n = 124) versus cefazolin 1g (n = 120) versus placebo (n = 117) infused intravenously immediately after cord clamped and 6 and 12 hours later. Results of both treatment groups combined.

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (oral temperature >37.9 degrees C twice at least 6 hours apart after first 24 hours); wound infection (redness, induration, tenderness and/or purulent discharge from the incision line); endometritis/parametritis (uterine and/or adnexal tenderness with fever) urinary tract infection (dysuria or pyuria and positive culture); need for antibiotic therapy (11% for treatment groups vs 27% for placebo); maternal length of stay (7.3 and 7.4 days for treatment groups vs 7.9 for placebo).

Notes

Side‐effects documented: two infusion‐related hypotensive episodes (one with cefazolin, one with placebo that necessitated withdrawal from study); six episodes of phlebitis (five in treated, one in placebo group); one episode of angioedema (placebo patient). Data provided on antibiotic resistance in wound isolates and screening cervical cultures. One episode of bacteremia (in placebo group); one episode of septic shock (in cefazolin‐treated group); both outcomes included as serious morbidity.
Follow‐up at 6 weeks.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Tully 1983

Methods

Randomized as determined by table of random numbers; placebo‐controlled; double‐blind
14 women (7 in each group) initially randomized were later excluded but have been included in intent to treat analysis.

Participants

Women undergoing primary cesarean section (inclusion criteria not consistent with the definition of non‐elective cesarean section used in this review).
Exclusion: <18 years of age, membranes ruptured >35 hours, allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin, fever, infection or antibiotic use, significant underlying cardiac, renal or hepatic disease, unable to provide consent.
Setting: Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, US, September 1978‐June 1980.

Interventions

Cefoxitin 2g IV immediately after the cord was clamped and at 4 and 8 hours (n = 52) versus matched placebo (mannitol with riboflavin) (n = 61).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (oral temperature >37.9 degrees C twice at least 6 hours apart after first 24 hours); urinary tract infection (positive culture); wound infection (purulence, cellulitis or dehiscence); endometritis (fever, uterine tenderness, abnormal lochia); septicemia (positive blood culture in a clinically septic patient); additional antibiotic use (8 in treatment group vs 12 in placebo).

Notes

Both episodes of septicemia occurred in the placebo group.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Turner 1990

Methods

Alternate patients undergoing caesarean section allocated to treatment or no treatment.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section (both elective and emergency).
Exclusion: on antibiotics, adverse reaction to penicillin or cephalosporin, pyrexia > 37.5 degrees C in labour, known vaginal pathogen, or suspected intrauterine infection.
Setting: Hammersmith Hospital (n = 102) and Northwick Park Hospital (n = 99), London, England.

Interventions

Cephradine 2g intravenously after induction of anesthesia and 1g 6 and 12 hours after the operation (n = 101) vs no treatment (n = 100).

Outcomes

Puerperal infection (temperature >37.5 degrees C after 24 hours); endometritis (pyrexia with uterine or adnexal tenderness); wound infection (purulent discharge or erythema, induration and serous discharge with positive culture); urinary tract infection (>100,000 colony forming units in urine culture); length of hospital stay (7.63 for treatment group, 7.18 for control group [SD not provided]).

Notes

Definitions of elective and emergency procedure, nor separate outcomes for each group, provided.
Follow‐up completed 1987.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

High risk

C ‐ Inadequate

Tzingounis 1982

Methods

Selected in a random manner; double‐blind; placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women in labour (non‐elective).
Exclusion: acute bleeding due to abruptio placentae, established infection.
Setting: Alexandra Maternity Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Interventions

Cefuroxime 750mg IV within 1 hour of surgery and every 8 hours for 72 hours (n = 46) versus matching placebo (comparable in appearance and viscosity) (n = 50).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (oral temperature of >100.3 degrees fahrenheit twice 6 hours apart) and infection of endometrium, urinary tract and wound (not defined); results of duration of maternal stay only provided for febrile patients.

Notes

No patients had any major complications from the use of cefuroxime.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Walss Rodriguez 1990

Methods

Allocated 'in random form' using a random table; not placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing urgent cesarean section.
Exclusion: fever, chorioamnionitis, penicillin allergy, antibiotic treatment in prior 2 weeks.
Setting: Coah, Mexico.

Interventions

Ampicillin 2g intravenously every 4 hours x 3 after clamping of cord (n = 59) vs no treatment.

Outcomes

Febrile syndrome; wound infection; abdominal wall abscess; endometritis.

Notes

No definitions of outcomes provided.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Weissberg 1971

Methods

'Selected at random'; not placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing primary cesarean section after the onset of labor.
Setting: Miami, Florida, US.
Mostly low‐income or indigent Negro women from ghetto areas of large metropolitan area.

Interventions

Penicillin G 2 million units IV every 4 hours and kanamycin 500mg IM every 12 hours as soon as it was decided to perform a cesarean section, at the time of operation or immediately post‐operatively and continued for a minimum of 3 days post‐operatively (n = 40) versus no treatment (n = 40).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (temperature of >100.3 degrees fahrenheit on any two days after first 24 hours); urinary tract infection, endometritis and wound infection (not defined); maternal length of stay (treatment 5.8 days vs 8.7 days for control group, no variance given).

Notes

One patient receiving penicillin had a drug rash on the third day.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Wong 1978

Methods

Randomized in numbered packages by the pharmacy department; placebo‐controlled; blinded.
Seven women initially randomized not included in final analysis (allocated group unknown).

Participants

Women with ruptured membranes who underwent internal fetal monitoring (not consistent with the definition of non‐elective used in this review).
Exclusion: fever, other antibiotic use, penicillin allergy.
Setting: Los Angeles County‐University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, US, January 1975‐January 1977; 87% Hispanic or Black.

Interventions

Cefazolin 1g IV after the cord was clamped and at 4‐6 hours and 10‐12 hours post‐operatively (n = 48) versus placebo (n = 45).

Outcomes

Standard temperature morbidity, endomyometritis, abdominal wound infection, urinary infections (no definitions provided for any outcomes).

Notes

Two women were said to develop a serious infection: one (cefazolin group) developed septic thrombophlebitis and is included as a serious outcome; the other (placebo group) was treated with antibiotics for prolonged fever (judged not to be a serious outcome for this review).

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Work 1977

Methods

Selected in random, double‐blind manner; placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women in labor.
Exclusion: acute bleeding due to abruptio placentae, infection on treatment; abnormal renal function, penicillin allergy.
Setting: University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbour, Michigan, US.

Interventions

Cephalothin 2g IV within one hour of operation and at 4 and 8 hours after (n = 40) versus comparable appearing placebo (n = 40).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (oral temperature >100.3 degrees fahrenheit twice 6 hours apart); infection of endometrium, urinary tract and wound (definitions not provided); fever index (40 degree hours for treatment group vs 83 for placebo group).

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Wu 1991

Methods

Randomized into three groups (irrigation vs systemic treatment vs no treatment).

Participants

Women undergoing both elective (n = 112) and non‐elective (n = 105) cesarean section. Only women undergoing an elective cesarean section were randomized to treatment or no treatment and have been included in analysis.
Setting: Beijing, China.

Interventions

Local irrigation with ampicillin 6g after delivery of the placenta (n = 39) vs penicillin 5.6 MU and gentamicin 240,000 U intravenously immediately after surgery and penicillin 1.6 MU and gentamicin 160,000 U per day intramuscularly x 3 days (n = 41) vs no treatment (n = 32).

Outcomes

Endometritis (presence of any 2 of following: temperature above 37.5 degrees C, uterine tenderness, foul vaginal discharge); abdominal wound infection (cellulitis with small amount of exudate within 2 months of operation); uterine incision infection (associated with late post‐partum haemorrhage); fever index.

Notes

Women undergoing non‐elective sections randomized to either treatment group (not included in this review).

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Yip 1997

Methods

Assigned by the anesthetist in a randomized, double‐blind manner; placebo‐controlled.

Participants

Women undergoing cesarean section.
Exclusion: penicillin allergy, current antibiotic use, fever, receipt of steroid injection.
Setting: Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong.

Interventions

Augmentin 1.2g (amoxycillin sodium 1000mg and clavulanate potassium 200mg) in 10ml saline (n = 160) versus saline placebo (n = 160).

Outcomes

Febrile morbidity (2 oral temperatures >37.9 degrees C at least 6 hours apart after first 24 hours); bacteriuria at day 3 (classified in this review as urinary tract infection); wound infection (purulent discharge, cellulitis, tenderness and wound abscess requiring incision and drainage); endometritis (fever, pelvic pain, uterine tenderness, purulent vaginal discharge without signs of infection in the lower genital tract); duration of hospital stay.

Notes

Sub‐rectus Redivac drain routinely inserted.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Young 1983

Methods

Randomly assigned; placebo‐controlled; physician team blinded.

Participants

Women in labour with an intrauterine pressure catheter and fetal scalp electrode (non‐elective).
Exclusion: fever, significant systemic disease.
Setting: Los Angeles County‐University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, US.
Predominantly (91%) Hispanic or Black.

Interventions

Cefoxitin 1g IV at time of cord clamping and at 4 and 8 hours (n = 50) versus matching placebo (n = 50).

Outcomes

Endomyometritis, abdominal wound infection, serious complications; duration of maternal hospital stay (treatment 5.1 days vs control 5.9 days, not statistically significant, no variance given).

Notes

One case of septic pelvic thrombophlebitis occurred in the treatment group; there were 8 episodes of bacteremia in the control group vs one in the treatment group; both outcomes combined under serious morbidity.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

C = centigrade
hr = hour/hours
IM = intramuscularly
IV = intravenously
MU = million units
q6hrs = every six hours
SD/sd = standard deviation
vs = versus

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Cormier 1988

Did not include women undergoing cesarean section.

Creatsas 1980

Not relevant to this review. Ampicillin or gentamycin given prior to cesarean section in women with intrauterine infection, to measure transplacental transfer. No control group, and no clinical outcomes given.

De Palma 1980

High risk women (membranes ruptured for more than six hours) initially were randomized to early treatment (ie prophylactic therapy continued for four days) vs standard treatment (ie treatment only started when infection apparent). When the results were compared midway through the study, standard therapy was abandoned. The results for the two groups prior to abandoning the no treatment group could not be obtained from the paper.

Elliott 1982

Only the first 42 women were randomized to placebo or active treatment; after that a significant difference was observed between the placebo and treated groups and the placebo arms were discontinued. Further women were randomized to two different active treatments. The data for the first part of the study (with only the first 42 women) are not available from the published paper.

Itskovitz 1979

Not all women were randomly allocated to treatment or no treatment. 150 women were assigned at random to each of the two wings of the department according to the day of their admission, each wing receiving women on alternate days. In both wings, of the last 50 women every second woman served as a control. Fifty women in one wing received IV cephalothin or oral cephalexin, 50 women in the other wing received IV or oral ampicillin. The first 50 women enrolled were all treated; separate results for the last 100 women (who were alternately allocated therapy or no treatment) are not available.

Kreutner 1979

After approximately 70% of the planned study population had been randomized to placebo or one of two active treatment groups, an unacceptably high morbidity rate in the placebo group was confirmed and the placebo arm was discontinued. Further women were randomized to two different active treatments. The data for the first part of the study when women were randomized to treatment or placebo are not available from the published paper.

Louie 1982

Eligible women were in active labor with ruptured membranes. While this study initially included a placebo control group, this group was dropped after 30 women had been enrolled on the basis of ethical considerations about assigning women to a nontreatment group in which the likelihood of morbidity was high. Only seven women (out of a total of 195 women entered) were randomized to placebo, separate results on the initial part of the study not available. The placebo (7) and treatment groups (188) were very imbalanced making a meaningful comparison between groups impossible.

Pawelec 1994

Abstract only; unable to confirm random allocation and method of allocation to no treatment group; data for separate outcomes of endometritis and wound infection not provided.

Petersen 1985

No numerical data.

Pitt 2001

Women were randomized to receive intravaginal metronidazole or placebo gel during labour; most, but not all patients also received one prophylactic dose of cefazolin after cord clamping.

Roex 1987

No clinical outcomes.

Sengupta 1976

In this study, in which women were alternately allocated to antibiotic prophylaxis or no treatment, the women enrolled were undergoing both gynaecological and obstetrical surgery. Rates of infectious complications are given for all abdominal surgery (cesarean section, abdominal hysterectomy and laparotomy). Data specifically on the women who underwent cesarean section are, however, not available from the published study.

Skryten 1988

Abstract only. Rates for all post‐operative infection morbidity and clinically significant genital tract‐related infections (wound infections, endometritis) and abscess formation (septicemia) combined; rates for individual outcomes not provided.

Spreafico 1987

Results combined from three time periods. In only one period did it appear women were randomized to antibiotic therapy or no treatment; results just for this period not available in published report.

Ujah 1992

Abstract only; results given for post‐operative sepsis (38.9% in placebo group, 0% in treatment group), but data for separate outcomes not given.

Voto 1986

All women received antibiotics (randomized to cefoxitin after cord clamping and then every fours hours x 2 or oral ampicillin 2g daily x seven days); no clinical outcomes reported.

Wallace 1984

This was not a randomized trial of antibiotic prophylaxis. Three distinct groups of women were studied: one group was part of randomized trial that compared extracorporeal cesarean section with prophylactic antibiotic; the second group received extracorporeal cesarean section and no antibiotics; the third group received extracorporeal cesarean section with antibiotics (the decision to administer antibiotics in the latter two groups was at the discretion of the physician).

Wells 1994

Absolute numbers cannot be calculated from data provided in abstract; no published version of this study identified.

IV = intravenous

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Fever Show forest plot

40

7180

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.45 [0.39, 0.52]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 1 Fever.

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 1 Fever.

1.1 Elective cesarean delivery

9

1814

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.32, 0.75]

1.2 Non‐elective cesarean delivery

15

2292

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.31, 0.51]

1.3 Both elective and non‐elective, or undefined cesarean delivery

21

3074

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.38, 0.58]

2 Wound infection Show forest plot

70

11142

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.41 [0.35, 0.48]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 2 Wound infection.

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 2 Wound infection.

2.1 Elective cesarean delivery

12

2015

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.53, 0.99]

2.2 Non‐elective cesarean delivery

20

2780

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.26, 0.51]

2.3 Both elective and non‐elective, or undefined cesarean delivery

43

6347

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.29, 0.43]

3 Endometritis Show forest plot

76

11957

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.34, 0.43]

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 3 Endometritis.

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 3 Endometritis.

3.1 Elective cesarean delivery

12

2037

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.22, 0.64]

3.2 Non‐elective cesarean delivery

23

3132

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.34, 0.46]

3.3 Both elective and non‐elective, or undefined cesarean delivery

48

6788

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.30, 0.44]

4 Urinary tract infection Show forest plot

57

8857

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.46, 0.64]

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 4 Urinary tract infection.

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 4 Urinary tract infection.

4.1 Elective cesarean delivery

9

1438

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.29, 1.11]

4.2 Non‐elective cesarean delivery

18

2572

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.30, 0.60]

4.3 Both elective and non‐elective, or undefined cesarean delivery

34

4847

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.48, 0.71]

4.4 Elective cesarean delivery

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Serious infectious morbidity/death Show forest plot

29

4760

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.42 [0.28, 0.65]

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 5 Serious infectious morbidity/death.

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 5 Serious infectious morbidity/death.

5.1 Elective cesarean delivery

3

445

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.04, 24.21]

5.2 Non‐elective cesarean delivery

8

1336

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.13, 0.61]

5.3 Both elective and non‐elective, or undefined cesarean delivery

20

2979

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.30, 0.84]

6 Maternal side‐effects Show forest plot

11

1976

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.02 [0.91, 4.50]

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 6 Maternal side‐effects.

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 6 Maternal side‐effects.

6.1 Elective cesarean delivery

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Non‐elective cesarean delivery

7

1268

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.73 [0.67, 4.43]

6.3 Both elective and non‐elective, or undefined cesarean delivery

5

708

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.93 [0.63, 13.74]

7 Days in hospital (mother) Show forest plot

15

2964

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.47 [‐0.68, ‐0.26]

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 7 Days in hospital (mother).

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 7 Days in hospital (mother).

7.1 Elective cesarean delivery

3

830

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.37 [‐0.73, ‐0.02]

7.2 Non‐elective cesarean delivery

3

586

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.77, ‐0.13]

7.3 Both elective and non‐elective, or undefined cesarean delivery

10

1548

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.54 [‐0.88, ‐0.19]

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 1 Fever.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 1 Fever.

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 2 Wound infection.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 2 Wound infection.

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 3 Endometritis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 3 Endometritis.

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 4 Urinary tract infection.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 4 Urinary tract infection.

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 5 Serious infectious morbidity/death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 5 Serious infectious morbidity/death.

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 6 Maternal side‐effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 6 Maternal side‐effects.

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 7 Days in hospital (mother).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section, Outcome 7 Days in hospital (mother).

Comparison 1. Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Fever Show forest plot

40

7180

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.45 [0.39, 0.52]

1.1 Elective cesarean delivery

9

1814

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.32, 0.75]

1.2 Non‐elective cesarean delivery

15

2292

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.31, 0.51]

1.3 Both elective and non‐elective, or undefined cesarean delivery

21

3074

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.38, 0.58]

2 Wound infection Show forest plot

70

11142

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.41 [0.35, 0.48]

2.1 Elective cesarean delivery

12

2015

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.53, 0.99]

2.2 Non‐elective cesarean delivery

20

2780

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.26, 0.51]

2.3 Both elective and non‐elective, or undefined cesarean delivery

43

6347

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.29, 0.43]

3 Endometritis Show forest plot

76

11957

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.34, 0.43]

3.1 Elective cesarean delivery

12

2037

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.22, 0.64]

3.2 Non‐elective cesarean delivery

23

3132

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.34, 0.46]

3.3 Both elective and non‐elective, or undefined cesarean delivery

48

6788

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.30, 0.44]

4 Urinary tract infection Show forest plot

57

8857

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.46, 0.64]

4.1 Elective cesarean delivery

9

1438

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.29, 1.11]

4.2 Non‐elective cesarean delivery

18

2572

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.30, 0.60]

4.3 Both elective and non‐elective, or undefined cesarean delivery

34

4847

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.48, 0.71]

4.4 Elective cesarean delivery

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Serious infectious morbidity/death Show forest plot

29

4760

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.42 [0.28, 0.65]

5.1 Elective cesarean delivery

3

445

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.04, 24.21]

5.2 Non‐elective cesarean delivery

8

1336

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.13, 0.61]

5.3 Both elective and non‐elective, or undefined cesarean delivery

20

2979

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.30, 0.84]

6 Maternal side‐effects Show forest plot

11

1976

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.02 [0.91, 4.50]

6.1 Elective cesarean delivery

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Non‐elective cesarean delivery

7

1268

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.73 [0.67, 4.43]

6.3 Both elective and non‐elective, or undefined cesarean delivery

5

708

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.93 [0.63, 13.74]

7 Days in hospital (mother) Show forest plot

15

2964

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.47 [‐0.68, ‐0.26]

7.1 Elective cesarean delivery

3

830

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.37 [‐0.73, ‐0.02]

7.2 Non‐elective cesarean delivery

3

586

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.77, ‐0.13]

7.3 Both elective and non‐elective, or undefined cesarean delivery

10

1548

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.54 [‐0.88, ‐0.19]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section