Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Pengurangan dan/atau pemberhentian antipsikotik sebagai rawatan spesifik untuk tdiskinesia tardif

Abstract

Background

Since the 1950s antipsychotic medication has been extensively used to treat people with chronic mental illnesses such as schizophrenia. These drugs, however, have also been associated with a wide range of adverse effects, including movement disorders such as tardive dyskinesia (TD) – a problem often seen as repetitive involuntary movements around the mouth and face. Various strategies have been examined to reduce a person's cumulative exposure to antipsychotics. These strategies include dose reduction, intermittent dosing strategies such as drug holidays, and antipsychotic cessation.

Objectives

To determine whether a reduction or cessation of antipsychotic drugs is associated with a reduction in TD for people with schizophrenia (or other chronic mental illnesses) who have existing TD. Our secondary objective was to determine whether the use of specific antipsychotics for similar groups of people could be a treatment for TD that was already established.

Search methods

We updated previous searches of Cochrane Schizophrenia's study‐based Register of Trials including the registers of clinical trials (16 July 2015 and 26 April 2017). We searched references of all identified studies for further trial citations. We also contacted authors of trials for additional information.

Selection criteria

We included reports if they assessed people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses who had established antipsychotic‐induced TD, and had been randomly allocated to (a) antipsychotic maintenance versus antipsychotic cessation (placebo or no intervention), (b) antipsychotic maintenance versus antipsychotic reduction (including intermittent strategies), (c) specific antipsychotics for the treatment of TD versus placebo or no intervention, and (d) specific antipsychotics versus other antipsychotics or versus any other drugs for the treatment of TD.

Data collection and analysis

We independently extracted data from these trials and estimated risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assumed that people who dropped out had no improvement.

Main results

We included 13 RCTs with 711 participants; eight of these studies were newly included in this 2017 update. One trial is ongoing.

There was low‐quality evidence of a clear difference on no clinically important improvement in TD favouring switch to risperidone compared with antipsychotic cessation (with placebo) (1 RCT, 42 people, RR 0.45 CI 0.23 to 0.89, low‐quality evidence). Because evidence was of very low quality for antipsychotic dose reduction versus antipsychotic maintenance (2 RCTs, 17 people, RR 0.42 95% CI 0.17 to 1.04, very low‐quality evidence), and for switch to a new antipsychotic versus switch to another new antipsychotic (5 comparisons, 5 RCTs, 140 people, no meta‐analysis, effects for all comparisons equivocal), we are uncertain about these effects. There was low‐quality evidence of a significant difference on extrapyramidal symptoms: use of antiparkinsonism medication favouring switch to quetiapine compared with switch to haloperidol (1 RCT, 45 people, RR 0.45 CI 0.21 to 0.96, low‐quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference for switch to risperidone or haloperidol compared with antipsychotic cessation (with placebo) (RR 1 RCT, 48 people, RR 2.08 95% CI 0.74 to 5.86, low‐quality evidence) and switch to risperidone compared with switch to haloperidol (RR 1 RCT, 37 people, RR 0.68 95% CI 0.34 to 1.35, very low‐quality evidence).

Trials also reported on secondary outcomes such as other TD symptom outcomes, other adverse events outcomes, mental state, and leaving the study early, but the quality of the evidence for all these outcomes was very low due mainly to small sample sizes, very wide 95% CIs, and risk of bias. No trials reported on social confidence, social inclusion, social networks, or personalised quality of life, outcomes that we designated as being important to patients.

Authors' conclusions

Limited data from small studies using antipsychotic reduction or specific antipsychotic drugs as treatments for TD did not provide any convincing evidence of the value of these approaches. There is a need for larger trials of a longer duration to fully investigate this area.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Plain language summary

Pengurangan dan/atau pemberhentian antipsikotik sebagai rawatan spesifik untuk diskinesia tardif

Soalan ulasan

Untuk menentukan sama ada berhenti atau mengurangkan ubat‐ubatan antipsikotik membantu dalam pengurangan diskinesia tardif untuk orang dengan skizofrenia. Untuk memeriksa sama ada ubat antipsikotik khusus boleh menjadi rawatan untuk diskinesia tardif.

Latar belakang

Orang dengan skizofrenia sering mendengar suara dan melihat sesuatu (halusinasi) dan mempunyai kepercayaan aneh (delusi). Rawatan utama untuk skizofrenia adalah ubat antipsikotik. Walau bagaimanapun, ubat‐ubatan ini boleh memberi kesan sampingan yang melemahkan. Diskinesia tardif adalah pergerakan luar kawalan yang menyebabkan muka, mulut, lidah dan rahang menggigil‐gigil, kejang dan berkerut. Ia disebabkan oleh penggunaan jangka panjang atau dos ubat antipsikotik yang tinggi, sukar dirawat dan tidak dapat disembuhkan. Pelbagai strategi telah dicadangkan untuk mengurangkan pendedahan seseorang kepada ubat antipsikotik. Ini termasuklah merendahkan dos ubat, ‘cuti ubat’ berjeda, dan berhenti mengambil ubat antipsikotik sama sekali.

Ciri‐ciri kajian

Ulasan itu memasukkan 13 kajian dengan sejumlah 711 orang dengan skizofrenia dan diagnosis psikiatri lain.

Keputusan utama

Oleh kerana kualiti teruk, saiz kecil kajian, dan data yang terhad dari 13 kajian, bukti adalah terhad. Tidak diketahui sama ada strategi seperti pengurangan dos, 'cuti ubat', dan berhenti ubat membantu dalam merawat diskinesia tardif. Terdapat bukti terhad pada ubat‐ubatan antipsikotik khusus dalam rawatan diskinesia tardif.

Kualiti bukti

Bukti adalah teruk, berskala kecil, dan berjangka pendek. Terdapat keperluan untuk kajian yang lebih besar untuk tempoh yang lebih lama bagi menyiasat penuh bidang ini.

Ringkasan bahasa biasa ini disesuaikan oleh para penulis ulasan daripada ringkasan yang ditulis oleh Ben Gray, Pegawai Penyelidik Kanan, Yayasan McPin (http://mcpin.org/).