Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Ambulatory oxygen for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

Lilker 1975 {published data only}

Lilker ES, Karnick A, Lerner L. Portable oxygen in chronic obstructive lung disease with hypoxemia and cor pulmonale. A controlled double blind cross over study. Chest 1975;68(2):236‐41.

McDonald 1995 {published data only}

McDonald CF, Blyth CM, Lazarus MD, Marschner I, Barter CE. Exertional oxygen of limited benefit in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild hypoexmia. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1995;152:1616‐9.

References to studies excluded from this review

Garrod 2000 {published data only}

Garrod R, Paul EA, Wedzicha JA. Supplemental oxygen during pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD with exercise hypoxaemia. Thorax 2000;55:539‐43.

Hoffman 1987 {published data only}

Hoffman LA, Dauber JH, Ferson PF, Openbrier DR, Zullo TG. Patient response to transtracheal oxygen delivery. American review of repiratory disease 1987;135:153‐6.

Howard 1991 {published data only}

Howard P, de Haller R. Domiciliary oxygen ‐ by liquid or concentrator?. European Respiratory Journal 1991;4:1284‐7.

Legget 1977 {published data only}

Leggett RJE, Flenley DC. Portable oxygen and exercise tolerance in patients with chronic hypoxic cor pulmonale. British Medical Journal 1977;2:84‐6.

Lock 1991 {published data only}

Lock SH, Paul EA, Rudd RM, Wedzicha JA. Portable oxygen therapy: assesment and usage. Respiratory Medicine 1991;85:407‐12.

Lock 1992 {published data only}

Lock SH, Blower G, Prynne M, Wedzicha JA. Comparison of liquid and gaseous oxygen for domiciliary portable use. Thorax 1992;47:98‐100.

Mckeon 1988 {published data only}

McKeon JL, Tarrant PE, Tomlinson JC, Mitchell CA. Portable oxygen in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Medicine 1988;18:125‐9.
McKeon JL, Tomlinson JC, Tarrant PE, Mitchell CA. The assessment of portable oxygen in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD). The Thoracic Society of Australia. 1986:621.

Mitlehner 1992 {published data only}

Mitlehner W. Effects of long‐term oxygen therapy due to portable liquid oxygen tanks in disabled malnourished chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with borderline hypoxemia. Respiration 1992;24((Suppl 2)):40‐5.

Ramer 1982 {published data only}

Ramer P, Medici TC. Long‐term oxygen therapy in ambulatory patients with chronic respiratory diseases [Langzeit‐Sauerstofftherapie bei ambulanten patienten mit chronischen atemwegerkrankungen]. Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift. Journal Suisse de Medecine 1982;112:424‐30.

Roberts 1996 {published data only}

Roberts CM, Bell J, Wedzicha JA. Comparison of the efficacy of a demand oxygen delivery system with continuos low flow oxygen in subjects with stable COPD and severe oxygen desaturation on walking. Thorax 1996;51:831‐4.

Rooyackers 1997 {published data only}

Rooyackers JM, Dekhuijzen PN, Van Herwaarden CL, Folgering HT. Training with supplemental oxygen in patients with COPD and hypoxaemia at peak exercise. European Respiratory Journal 1997;10(6):1278‐84. [PMID: 9192929]

Ruiz 1994 {published data only}

Ruiz JMG, Leon JV, satue JLG, Agudo LS, Calatrava JM, Carreras YJ. Almitrine bismesylate treatment in chronic respiratory insufficiency. Article in Spanish [Tratamiento con bismesilato de almitrina en la insuficiencia respiratoria cronica]. Revista Clinica Espanola 1994;194:1007‐12.

Vergeret 1989 {published data only}

Vergeret J, Brambilla C, Mounier L. Portable oxygen therapy: use and benefit in hypoxaemic COPD patients on long‐term oxygen therapy. European Respiratory Journal 1989;2:20‐5.

Waterhouse 1983 {published data only}

Waterhouse JC, Howard P. Breathlessness and portable oxygen in chronic obstructive airways disease. Thorax 1983;38:302‐6.

Woodcock 1981 {published data only}

Woodcock AA, Gross ER, Geddes DM. Oxygen relieves breathlessness in "pink puffers". Lancet 1981;25:907‐9.

Additional references

ATS 1995

American Thoracic Society. Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1995;152(5 Pt 2):S77‐121.

Cooper 1993

Cooper CB. In: Casaburi R, Petty TL editor(s). Principles and practice of pulmonary rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1993:183‐203.

Jadad 1996

Jadad A, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenknson C, Reynolds JM, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials: is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17:1‐12.

Morrison 1992

Morrison DA, Stovall JR. Increased exercise capacity in hypoxemic patients after long‐term oxygen therapy. Chest 1992;102(2):542‐50.

MRC 1981

Medical Research Council Working Party. Long term domiciliary oxygen therapy in chronic hypoxic cor pulmonale complicating chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Lancet 1981;1(8222):681‐6.

NOTT 1980

Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy Trial Group. Continuous or nocturnal oxygen therapy in hypoxemicchronic obstructive lung disease: a clinical trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 1980;93(3):391‐8.

O'Donnell 2001

O'Donnell DE, D'Arsigny C, Webb KA. Effects of hyperoxia on ventilatory limitation during exercvise in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 2001;163(4):892‐8.

Spence 1993

Spence DP, Graham DR, Ahmed J, Rees K, Pearson MG, Calverley PM. Does cold air affect exercise capacity and dyspnea in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?. Chest 1993;103(3):693‐9.

Stewart 2001

Stewart DG, Drake DF, Robertson C, Marwitz JH, Kreutzer JS, Cifu DX. Benefits of an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program: a prospective analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2001;82(3):347‐52. [PMID: 11245757]

Swinburn 1991

Swinburn CR, Mould H, Stone TN, Corris PA, Gibson GJ. Symptomatic benefit of supplemental oxygen in hypoxemic patients with chronic lung disease. American Review of Respiratory Disease 1991;143(5 Pt 1):913‐5. [PMID: 2024842]

Wedzicha 2000

Wedzicha JA. Effects of long‐term oxygen therapy on neuropsychiatric function and quality of life. Respiratory Care 2000;45(1):119‐24. [PMID: 10771787]

Weitzenblum 1991

Weitzenblum E, Oswald M, Apprill M, Ratomaharo J, Kessler R. Evolution of physiological variables in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease before and during long‐term oxygen therapy. Respiration 1991;58(3‐4):126‐31. [PMID: 1745843]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Lilker 1975

Methods

Randomised double blinded placebo controlled crossover trial. Study conducted in Toronto, Canada.

Participants

Nine males patients with COPD and an arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) while sitting and breathing room air of less than 60mm Hg (hypoxemia) with clinical and ECG evidence for cor pulmonale were selected. All patients were stable and showed no subjective change or change in exercise tolerance for 3 months prior to the start of the study.

Interventions

All patients were assigned five weeks of liquid oxygen therapy (at 2 L/min providing 19.7+‐2.2% oxygen) or five weeks of liquid air treatment in a double‐blinded randomised crossover order. All patients were taught how to use the portable gas apparatus (Linde walker) prior to start of study. All study measurements were also taught prior to the start of the study. All patients were visited at home once a week for study measurements and at the end of the five week period, all patients came into hospital for complete assessment. Exercise challenge consisted of a bicycle ergometer with progressively increasing workloads starting at 50 kilopond meters/min and increased by 50 kilopond meters every minute until patient stopped. There was a 10 day washout period (when no portable gas apparatus was supplied) after which coded gas apparatus were delivered to the patients home.

Outcomes

All study measurements were done 4‐24 hours after patients stopped use of portable gas apparatus. FVC, MVV, FEV1/FVC, RV, RV/TLC, gas diffusion, heart rate, VE, arterial pH, PaCO2, PaO2, miles walked per day using pedometer, reticulocyte count, hematocrit, hemoglobin.

Notes

Study used codes to conceal treatment allocation.

Jadad score = 4

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

McDonald 1995

Methods

Randomised double blinded placebo controlled crossover trial. Study conducted in Victoria, Australia.

Participants

Thirty‐six patients entered the study and 10 dropped out for various reasons. Data reported on 26 patients who completed the study. All patients had COPD without resting hypoxemia (PaO2 > 60 mmHg), baseline values were mean (SD): age 73(6), FEV1 0.9(0.4) L, DLco 10.6 (2.4) ml/mim/mm Hg, PCO2 41 (3.3) mm Hg, SaO2 94 (2.1). None of the patients had an exacerbation of their COPD in the preceding 3 months, none had symtomatic cardiac dysfunction, angina pectoris or locomotor disability.

Interventions

All patients were assigned six weeks of portable gas oxygen cylinders (at 4 L/min intranasally) or six weeks of portable air treatment in a double‐blinded randomised crossover fashion. All patients were made familiar with diary cards and with performance of exercise tests. Exercise challenge consisted of step tests (patient stepped in time with a metronome at a previously determined level and until patient voluntarily stopped) and 6 minute walking distance (6MWD). All study measurements were done and taught prior to the start of the study. Study measurements were done at baseline and at the first and second six week periods. There was no mention in the study of a washout period.

Outcomes

All study measurements were done with the patient using both air and oxygen irrespective of whether the patient was using air or oxygen in the preceding 6 weeks, the results were reported separately (only study measurements using air were used in the review as it was same methodology as the other study). Borg score, 6MWD, quality of life using CRDQ, symptom scores, SaO2.

Notes

Study used camouflaged cylinders for treatment delivery.

Jadad score = 4

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

A ‐ Adequate

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Garrod 2000

Delivery of oxygen or air, only when patients exercised three times a week for six weeks, for one hour per session. The two study groups consisted of a mixture of patients who were on long‐term oxygen therapy (5 in the air group and 6 in the oxygen group) data was not presented separately from those that did not have long‐term oxygen therapy.

Hoffman 1987

Transtracheal route of oxygen versus nasal cannula.

Howard 1991

Not an RCT but a narrative review.

Legget 1977

Short‐term/acute study, not a study of long‐term ambulatory oxygen therapy.

Lock 1991

Not an RCT but a questionnaire survey of patients currently using portable oxygen.

Lock 1992

Gaseous versus liquid oxygen with no placebo or control arm.

Mckeon 1988

Not a study of long‐term ambulatory oxygen therapy. Study tested patients in randomised fashion with 100% oxyen or room air and while they underwent exercise challenge using a treadmill.

Mitlehner 1992

Not an RCT but a discussion of a proposed RCT.

Ramer 1982

Not an RCT but a literature review.

Roberts 1996

On demand oxygen versus continuous oxygen supply and no placebo or control group.

Rooyackers 1997

Delivery of oxygen or air, only when patients exercised five times a week for 10 weeks, for 80 minutes per session. The intervention did not involve long‐term oxygen therapy.

Ruiz 1994

Study intervention included ambulatory oxygen therapy with either almitrine bismesylate (50‐100mg/day) or placebo with all patients receiving oxygen therapy.

Vergeret 1989

No placebo arm (study of different types of oxygen delivery systems) and also a short‐term/acute study, not a study of long‐term ambulatory oxygen therapy.

Waterhouse 1983

Short‐term/acute study, not a study of long‐term ambulatory oxygen therapy.

Woodcock 1981

Short‐term/acute study, not a study of long‐term ambulatory oxygen therapy.

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FVC (L) Show forest plot

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.53, 0.59]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 1 FVC (L).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 1 FVC (L).

2 MVV (L/min) Show forest plot

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.0 [‐8.45, 6.45]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 2 MVV (L/min).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 2 MVV (L/min).

3 FEV1/FVC (%) Show forest plot

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.0 [‐18.33, 10.33]

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 3 FEV1/FVC (%).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 3 FEV1/FVC (%).

4 RV (L) Show forest plot

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.22 [‐1.47, 1.03]

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 4 RV (L).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 4 RV (L).

5 Heart rate (bpm) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 5 Heart rate (bpm).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 5 Heart rate (bpm).

5.1 At rest

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.0 [‐13.97, 1.97]

5.2 Maximal exercise

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐9.08, 9.08]

6 VE (L/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 6 VE (L/min).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 6 VE (L/min).

6.1 At rest

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐5.50, 4.70]

6.2 Maximal exercise

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐11.0 [‐17.53, ‐4.47]

7 Arterial pH (units) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 7 Arterial pH (units).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 7 Arterial pH (units).

7.1 At rest

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.02 [‐0.12, 0.08]

7.2 Maximal exercise

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.04 [‐0.30, 0.22]

8 PaCO2 (mm Hg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 8 PaCO2 (mm Hg).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 8 PaCO2 (mm Hg).

8.1 At rest

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.0 [‐9.56, 13.56]

8.2 Maximal exercise

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.0 [‐20.37, 12.37]

9 PaO2 (mm Hg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 9 PaO2 (mm Hg).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 9 PaO2 (mm Hg).

9.1 At rest

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

17.0 [9.13, 24.87]

9.2 Maximal exercise

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

15.0 [‐2.59, 32.59]

10 Distance walked on pedometer (miles/day) Show forest plot

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [‐0.31, 0.95]

Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 10 Distance walked on pedometer (miles/day).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 10 Distance walked on pedometer (miles/day).

11 6MWD (meters) Show forest plot

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

15.0 [‐33.94, 63.94]

Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 11 6MWD (meters).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 11 6MWD (meters).

12 Borg score ‐ dyspnea (higher score worse) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 12 Borg score ‐ dyspnea (higher score worse).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 12 Borg score ‐ dyspnea (higher score worse).

12.1 During 6MWD

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐0.79, 0.59]

12.2 During step exercise test

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.30 [‐0.98, 0.38]

13 Desaturation (% fall in SaO2) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 13 Desaturation (% fall in SaO2).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 13 Desaturation (% fall in SaO2).

13.1 During 6MWD

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [‐2.25, 3.45]

13.2 During step exercise test

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [‐1.36, 2.56]

14 Quality of life (Chronic respiratory disease questionnaire) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 14 Quality of life (Chronic respiratory disease questionnaire).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 14 Quality of life (Chronic respiratory disease questionnaire).

14.1 Dyspnea

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.0 [‐1.26, 5.26]

14.2 Fatigue

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [‐1.17, 3.17]

14.3 Emotional function

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [‐3.63, 5.63]

14.4 Mastery

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [‐2.00, 4.00]

15 Step exercise testing (number of steps) Show forest plot

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [‐6.52, 12.52]

Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 15 Step exercise testing (number of steps).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 15 Step exercise testing (number of steps).

16 DLco (ml/min/mm Hg) Show forest plot

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.30 [‐8.47, 7.87]

Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 16 DLco (ml/min/mm Hg).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 16 DLco (ml/min/mm Hg).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 1 FVC (L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 1 FVC (L).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 2 MVV (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 2 MVV (L/min).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 3 FEV1/FVC (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 3 FEV1/FVC (%).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 4 RV (L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 4 RV (L).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 5 Heart rate (bpm).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 5 Heart rate (bpm).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 6 VE (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 6 VE (L/min).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 7 Arterial pH (units).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 7 Arterial pH (units).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 8 PaCO2 (mm Hg).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 8 PaCO2 (mm Hg).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 9 PaO2 (mm Hg).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 9 PaO2 (mm Hg).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 10 Distance walked on pedometer (miles/day).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 10 Distance walked on pedometer (miles/day).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 11 6MWD (meters).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 11 6MWD (meters).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 12 Borg score ‐ dyspnea (higher score worse).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 12 Borg score ‐ dyspnea (higher score worse).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 13 Desaturation (% fall in SaO2).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 13 Desaturation (% fall in SaO2).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 14 Quality of life (Chronic respiratory disease questionnaire).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 14 Quality of life (Chronic respiratory disease questionnaire).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 15 Step exercise testing (number of steps).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 15 Step exercise testing (number of steps).

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 16 DLco (ml/min/mm Hg).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air), Outcome 16 DLco (ml/min/mm Hg).

Comparison 1. Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FVC (L) Show forest plot

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.53, 0.59]

2 MVV (L/min) Show forest plot

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.0 [‐8.45, 6.45]

3 FEV1/FVC (%) Show forest plot

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.0 [‐18.33, 10.33]

4 RV (L) Show forest plot

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.22 [‐1.47, 1.03]

5 Heart rate (bpm) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 At rest

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.0 [‐13.97, 1.97]

5.2 Maximal exercise

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐9.08, 9.08]

6 VE (L/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 At rest

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐5.50, 4.70]

6.2 Maximal exercise

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐11.0 [‐17.53, ‐4.47]

7 Arterial pH (units) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 At rest

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.02 [‐0.12, 0.08]

7.2 Maximal exercise

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.04 [‐0.30, 0.22]

8 PaCO2 (mm Hg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 At rest

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.0 [‐9.56, 13.56]

8.2 Maximal exercise

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.0 [‐20.37, 12.37]

9 PaO2 (mm Hg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 At rest

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

17.0 [9.13, 24.87]

9.2 Maximal exercise

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

15.0 [‐2.59, 32.59]

10 Distance walked on pedometer (miles/day) Show forest plot

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [‐0.31, 0.95]

11 6MWD (meters) Show forest plot

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

15.0 [‐33.94, 63.94]

12 Borg score ‐ dyspnea (higher score worse) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12.1 During 6MWD

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐0.79, 0.59]

12.2 During step exercise test

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.30 [‐0.98, 0.38]

13 Desaturation (% fall in SaO2) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 During 6MWD

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [‐2.25, 3.45]

13.2 During step exercise test

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [‐1.36, 2.56]

14 Quality of life (Chronic respiratory disease questionnaire) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

14.1 Dyspnea

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.0 [‐1.26, 5.26]

14.2 Fatigue

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [‐1.17, 3.17]

14.3 Emotional function

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [‐3.63, 5.63]

14.4 Mastery

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [‐2.00, 4.00]

15 Step exercise testing (number of steps) Show forest plot

1

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [‐6.52, 12.52]

16 DLco (ml/min/mm Hg) Show forest plot

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.30 [‐8.47, 7.87]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Ambulatory oxygen therapy versus Placebo (air)