Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 19 marzo 2015

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000104Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 20 octubre 2003see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Neonatología

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2007 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • David J Henderson‐Smart

    Correspondencia a: NSW Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, Queen Elizabeth II Research Institute, Sydney, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Tushar Bhuta

    Dept of Neonatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia

  • Filip Cools

    Pediatrics, Academic Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium

  • Martin Offringa

    Pediatrics, H3‐144, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Contributions of authors

An earlier version of this review was developed by Bhuta and Henderson‐Smart and published in 1996. Both authors were involved at all stages in the review. In 1999 the review was reformatted by Henderson‐Smart with inclusion of two new reviewers, Cools and Offringa. Each author evaluated the trials and extracted data independently. Henderson‐Smart entered the data and wrote the text while all the co‐reviewers contributed to data checking and editing. The current update included a search by Henderson‐Smart and the inclusion of one new trial which was evaluated by all authors.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

  • Department of Neonatology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

  • Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, University of Sydney, Australia.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

None

Acknowledgements

Drs Clark, Ogawa, Gerstmann, Rettwitz‐Volk, Thome, Plavka, Moriette and Van Reempts kindly provided additional information about their studies.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2015 Mar 19

Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants

Review

Filip Cools, Martin Offringa, Lisa M Askie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000104.pub4

2009 Jul 08

Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants

Review

Filip Cools, David J Henderson‐Smart, Martin Offringa, Lisa M Askie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000104.pub3

2007 Jul 18

Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants

Review

David J Henderson‐Smart, Filip Cools, Tushar Bhuta, Martin Offringa

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000104.pub2

2003 Oct 20

Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants

Review

David J Henderson‐Smart, Tushar Bhuta, Filip Cools, Martin Offringa

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000104

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.