Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Aspirina para el tratamiento agudo de la cefalea tensional episódica en adultos

Collapse all Expand all

References

References to studies included in this review

Gatoulis 2012 {published data only}

Gatoulis SG, Voelker M, Fisher M. Assessment of the efficacy and safety profiles of aspirin and acetaminophen with codeine: results from 2 randomized, controlled trials in individuals with tension‐type headache and postoperative dental pain. Clinical Therapeutics 2012;34(1):138‐48. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.11.018]CENTRAL

Göbel 2001 {published data only}

Göbel H, Heinze A, Dworschak M, Heinze‐Kuhn K, Stolze H. Analgesic efficacy and tolerability of locally applied Oleum menthae piperitae preparation LI 170 in patients with migraine or tension‐type headache [German] [Wirksamkeit und verträglichkeit von oleum‐menthaepiperitae‐lösung LI 170 bei kopfschmerz vom spannungstyp und migräne]. Zeitschrift fur Allgemeinmedizin 2001;77(6):287‐95. CENTRAL

Martínez‐Martín 2001 {published data only}

Martínez‐Martín P, Raffaelli E, Titus F, Despuig J, Fragoso YD, Díez‐Tejedor E, et al. Efficacy and safety of metamizol vs. acetylsalicylic acid in patients with moderate episodic tension‐type headache: a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐ and active‐controlled, multicentre study. Cephalalgia 2001;21(5):604‐10. [DOI: 10.1046/j.1468‐2982.2001.00216.x]CENTRAL

Peters 1983 {published data only}

Peters BH, Fraim CJ, Masel BE. Comparison of 650 mg aspirin and 1,000 mg acetaminophen with each other, and with placebo in moderately severe headache. American Journal of Medicine 1983;74(6A):36‐42. [DOI: 10.1016/0002‐9343(83)90526‐0]CENTRAL

Steiner 2003 {published data only}

Steiner TJ, Lange R, Voelker M. Aspirin in episodic tension‐type headache: placebo‐controlled dose‐ranging comparison with paracetamol. Cephalalgia 2003;23(1):59‐66. [DOI: 10.1046/j.1468‐2982.2003.00470.x]CENTRAL

References to studies excluded from this review

Diamond 1983 {published data only}

Diamond S. Ibuprofen versus aspirin and placebo in the treatment of muscle contraction headache. Headache 1983;23(5):206‐10. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526‐4610.1983.hed2305206.x]CENTRAL

Diener 2005 {published data only}

Diener HC, Pfaffenrath V, Pageler L, Peil H, Aicher B. The fixed combination of acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol and caffeine is more effective than single substances and dual combination for the treatment of headache: a multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, single‐dose, placebo‐controlled parallel group study. Cephalalgia 2005;25(10):776‐87. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‐2982.2005.00948.x]CENTRAL

Glassman 1982 {published data only}

Glassman JM, Soyka JP, Pollack M. Treatment of muscle contraction headache: Micrainin vs. aspirin. Headache 1982;22(3):101‐9. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526‐4610.1982.hed2203101.x]CENTRAL

Langemark 1987 {published data only}

Langemark M. Effervescent aspirin in the treatment of tension headache. A double blind, placebo controlled cross‐over study. Cephalalgia 1985;5 (Suppl 3):152‐3. CENTRAL
Langemark M, Olesen J. Effervescent ASA versus solid ASA in the treatment of tension headache. A double‐blind, placebo controlled study. Headache 1987;27(2):90‐5. [10.1111/j.1526‐4610.1987.hed2702090.x]CENTRAL

NCT01552798 {unpublished data only}

Bayer (Responsible Party). A double‐blind, randomized, parallel, placebo‐controlled trial assessing the analgesic efficacy of a single dose of fast release aspirin 1000 mg and acetaminophen 1000 mg in tension type headache pain. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01552798 (accessed 6 September 2016). [CTG: NCT01552798]CENTRAL

Nebe 1995 {published data only}

Nebe J, Heier M, Diener HC. Low‐dose ibuprofen in self‐medication of mild to moderate headache: a comparison with acetylsalicylic acid and placebo. Cephalalgia 1995;15(6):531‐5. [PUBMED: 8706118]CENTRAL

Ryan 1977 {published data only}

Ryan RE. Motrin ‐ a new agent for the symptomatic treatment of muscle contraction headache. Headache 1977;16(6):280‐3. [PUBMED: 830617]CENTRAL

von Graffenried 1980 {published data only}

Wood A, von Graffenried B. Fluproquazone: analgesic activity in outpatients with non‐migrainous headache. Arzneimittelforschung 1981;31(5a):914‐7. [PUBMED: 7023493]CENTRAL
von Graffenried B, Hill RC, Nüesch E. Headache as a model for assessing mild analgesic drugs. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1980;20(2‐3):131‐44. [DOI: 10.1002/j.1552‐4604.1980.tb02535.x]CENTRAL
von Graffenried B, Nüesch E. Non‐migrainous headache for the evaluation of oral analgesics. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1980;10 (Suppl 2):225S‐31S. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365‐2125.1980.tb01804.x]CENTRAL

References to studies awaiting assessment

NCT01464983 {unpublished data only}

Bayer (Responsible Party). A multicentre randomised parallel‐groups double‐blind double‐dummy single‐dose study to compare acetylsalicylic acid 500 mg and 1,000 mg with ibuprofen 200 mg and 400 mg and placebo for tolerability and efficacy in the treatment of episodic tension‐type headache. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01464983 (accessed 5 September 2016). [Bayer: 11220; CTG: NCT01464983]CENTRAL

Additional references

BASH 2010

MacGregor EA, Steiner TJ, Davies PTG, for the British Association for the Study of Headache. Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension‐type, cluster, and medication overuse headache. 3rd edition (1st revision). www.bash.org.uk/wp‐content/uploads/2012/07/10102‐BASH‐Guidelines‐update‐2_v5‐1‐indd.pdf (accessed 6 September 2016).

Bendtsen 2010

Bendtsen L, Evers S, Linde M, Mitsikostas DD, Sandrini G, Schoenen J. EFNS guideline on the treatment of tension‐type headache ‐ report of an EFNS taskforce. European Journal of Neurology 2010;17(11):1318‐25. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‐1331.2010.03070.x]

Bendtsen 2016

Bendtsen L, Ashina S, Moore A, Steiner TJ. Muscles and their role in episodic tension‐type headache: implications for treatment. European Journal of Pain 2016;20(2):166‐75. [DOI: 10.1002/ejp.748]

BNF 2016

Aspirin. www.medicinescomplete.com/mc/bnf/current/PHP2596‐aspirin.htm. BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press, (accessed 30 November 2016). [DOI: 10.18578/BNF.456850132]

Brainin 2004

Brainin M, Barnes M, Baron JC, Gilhus NE, Hughes R, Selmaj K, et al. for the Guideline Standards Subcommittee of the EFNS Scientific Committee. Guidance for the preparation of neurological management guidelines by EFNS scientific task forces‐revised recommendations 2004. European Journal of Neurology 2004;11(9):577‐81. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‐1331.2004.00867.x]

Cook 1995

Cook RJ, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ 1995;310(6977):452‐4. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.310.6977.452]

Cristofolini 2008

Cristofolini A, Dalla Serra P, Scherillo G, Orrico D, Micciolo R. The prevalence of headache in a population of health care workers and the effects on productivity costs. La Medicina del Lavoro 2008;99(1):8‐15.

Dechartres 2013

Dechartres A, Trinquart L, Boutron I, Ravaud P. Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta‐epidemiological study. BMJ 2013;346:f2304. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2304]

Derry 2015

Derry S, Wiffen PJ, Moore RA, Bendtsen L. Ibuprofen for acute treatment of episodic tension‐type headache in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011474.pub2]

Drugs.com

Aspirin dosage. www.drugs.com/dosage/aspirin.html (accessed 19 September 2016).

Dworkin 2008

Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Journal of Pain 2008;9(2):105‐21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005]

EPOC 2015

Effective Practice, Organisation of Care (EPOC). 23. Worksheets for preparing a summary of findings using GRADE. epoc.cochrane.org/epoc‐specific‐resources‐review‐authors (accessed 30 November 2016).

Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas 2010

Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas C, Madeleine P, Caminero AB, Cuadrado ML, Arendt‐Nielsen L, Pareja JA. Generalized neck‐shoulder hyperalgesia in chronic tension‐type headache and unilateral migraine assessed by pressure pain sensitivity topographical maps of the trapezius muscle. Cephalalgia 2010;30(1):77‐86. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‐2982.2009.01901.x]

Forward 1998

Forward SP, McGrath PJ, MacKinnon D, Brown TL, Swann J, Currie EL. Medication patterns of recurrent headache sufferers: a community study. Cephalalgia 1998;18(3):146‐51. [DOI: 10.1046/j.1468‐2982.1998.1803146.x]

Fumal 2008

Fumal A, Schoenen J. Tension‐type headache: current research and clinical management. Lancet Neurology 2008;7(1):70‐83. [DOI: 10.1016/S1474‐4422(07)70325‐3]

Glasgow 2006

Glasgow JF. Reye's syndrome: the case for a causal link with aspirin. Drug Safety 2006;29(12):1111‐21. [PUBMED: 17147458]

Green 2009

Green MW. Primary and secondary headaches. In: Rowland LP, Pedley TA editor(s). Merritt's Neurology. 12th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2009:951‐60. [ISBN: 9780781791861]

Guyatt 2013a

Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Alonso‐Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2013;66(2):151‐7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006]

Guyatt 2013b

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Santesso N, Helfand M, Vist G, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables‐binary outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2013;66(2):158‐72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.012]

Haag 2011

Haag G, Diener HC, May A, Meyer C, Morck H, Straube A, et al. Self‐medication of migraine and tension‐type headache: summary of the evidence‐based recommendations of the Deutsche Migräne und Kopfschmerzgesellschaft (DMKG), the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (DGN), the Österreichische Kopfschmerzgesellschaft (ÖKSG) and the Schweizerische Kopfwehgesellschaft (SKG). Journal of Headache and Pain 2011;12(2):201‐17. [DOI: 10.1007/s10194‐010‐0266‐4]

Harpole 2005

Harpole LH, Samsa GP, Matchar DB, Silberstein SD, Blumenfeld A, Jurgelski AE. Burden of illness and satisfaction with care among patients with headache seen in a primary care setting. Headache 2005;45(8):1048‐55. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526‐4610.2005.05186.x]

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

IHS 2004

Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004;24 Suppl 1:1‐160. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‐2982.2003.00824.x]

IHS 2010

Bendtsen L, Bigal ME, Cerbo R, Diener HC, Holroyd K, Lampl C, et al. on behalf of the International Headache Society Clinical Trials Subcommittee. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in tension‐type headache: second edition. Cephalalgia 2010;30(1):1‐16. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‐2982.2009.01948.x]

IHS 2013

Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013;33(9):629‐808. [DOI: 10.1177/0333102413485658]

Jadad 1996a

Jadad AR, Carroll D, Moore A, McQuay H. Developing a database of published reports of randomised clinical trials in pain research. Pain 1996;66(2‐3):239‐46. [DOI: 10.1016/0304‐3959(96)03033‐3]

Jadad 1996b

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17(1):1‐12. [DOI: 10.1016/0197‐2456(95)00134‐4]

Kernick 2008

Kernick D, Stapley S, Hamilton W. GPs' classification of headache: is primary headache underdiagnosed?. British Journal of General Practice 2008;58(547):102‐4. [DOI: 10.3399/bjgp08X264072]

Kirthi 2013

Kirthi V, Derry S, Moore RA. Aspirin with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008041.pub3]

L'Abbé 1987

L'Abbé KA, Detsky AS, O'Rourke K. Meta‐analysis in clinical research. Annals of Internal Medicine 1987;107(2):224‐33. [DOI: 10.1046/j.1468‐2982.1998.1808552.x]

Lyngberg 2005

Lyngberg AC, Rasmussen BK, Jørgensen T, Jensen R. Secular changes in health care utilization and work absence for migraine and tension‐type headache: a population based study. European Journal of Epidemiology 2005;20(12):1007‐14. [DOI: 10.1007/s10654‐005‐3778‐5]

Mannix 2001

Mannix LK. Epidemiology and impact of primary headache disorders. Medical Clinics of North America 2001;85(4):887‐95. [DOI: 10.1016/S0025‐7125(05)70349‐7]

Monteith 2010

Monteith TS, Sprenger T. Tension type headache in adolescence and childhood: where are we now?. Current Pain and Headache Reports 2010;14(6):424‐30. [DOI: 10.1007/s11916‐010‐0149‐z]

Moore 1998

Moore RA, Gavaghan D, Tramer MR, Collins SL, McQuay HJ. Size is everything ‐ large amounts of information are needed to overcome random effects in estimating direction and magnitude of treatment effects. Pain 1998;78(3):209‐16. [DOI: 10.1016/S0304‐3959(98)00140‐7]

Moore 2008

Moore RA, Barden J, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Managing potential publication bias. In: McQuay HJ, Kalso E, Moore RA editor(s). Systematic Reviews in Pain Research: Methodology Refined. Seattle: IASP Press, 2008:15‐24. [ISBN: 978‐0‐931092‐69‐5]

Moore 2011

Moore RA, Derry S, McQuay HJ, Wiffen PJ. Single dose oral analgesics for acute postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008659.pub2]

Moore 2013

Moore RA, Straube S, Aldington D. Pain measures and cut‐offs ‐ 'no worse than mild pain' as a simple, universal outcome. Anaesthesia 2013;68(4):400‐12. [DOI: 10.1111/anae.12148]

Moore 2014

Moore RA, Derry S, Wiffen PJ, Straube S, Bendtsen L. Evidence for efficacy of acute treatment of episodic tension‐type headache: methodological critique of randomised trials for oral treatments. Pain 2014;155(11):2220‐8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.009]

Morris 1995

Morris JA, Gardner MJ. Calculating confidence intervals for relative risk, odds ratios and standardised ratios and rates. In: Gardner MJ, Altman DG editor(s). Statistics with Confidence ‐ Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines. London: British Medical Journal, 1995:50‐63. [ISBN: 0‐7279‐0222‐0]

Nüesch 2010

Nüesch E, Trelle S, Reichenbach S, Rutjes AW, Tschannen B, Altman DG, et al. Small study effects in meta‐analyses of osteoarthritis trials: meta‐epidemiological study. BMJ 2010;341:c3515. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c3515]

Oshinaike 2014

Oshinaike O, Ojo O, Okubadejo N, Ojelabi O, Dada A. Primary headache disorders at a tertiary health facility in Lagos, Nigeria: prevalence and consultation patterns. Biomedical Research International 2014;2014:782915. [DOI: 10.1155/2014/782915]

PaPaS 2012

Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group. PaPaS author and referee guidance. papas.cochrane.org/papas‐documents (accessed 6 September 2016).

Pop 2002

Pop PH, Gierveld CM, Karis HA, Tiedink HG. Epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss. European Journal of Neurology 2002;9(2):171‐4.

Rasmussen 2001

Rasmussen BK. Epidemiology of headache. Cephalalgia 2001;21(7):774‐7. [PUBMED: 11595011]

RevMan 2014 [Computer program]

The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

Sahler 2012

Sahler K. Epidemiology and cultural differences in tension‐type headache. Current Pain and Headache Research 2012;16(6):525‐32. [DOI: 10.1007/s11916‐012‐0296‐5]

Steiner 2003

Steiner TJ, Lange R, Voelker M. Aspirin in episodic tension‐type headache: placebo‐controlled dose‐ranging comparison with paracetamol. Cephalalgia 2003;23(1):59‐66. [DOI: 10.1046/j.1468‐2982.2003.00470.x]

Steiner 2004

Steiner TJ. Lifting the burden: the global campaign against headache. Lancet Neurology 2004;3(4):204‐5. [DOI: 10.1016/S1474‐4422(04)00703‐3]

Steiner 2011

Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, Dua T, Birbeck GL, Jensen R, Katsarava Z, et al. Time to act on headache disorders. Journal of Headache and Pain 2011;12(5):501‐3. [DOI: 10.1007/s10194‐011‐0368‐7]

Stephens 2016

Stephens G, Derry S, Moore RA. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) for acute treatment of episodic tension‐type headache in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011889.pub2]

Stovner 2007

Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R, Katsarava Z, Lipton R, Scher AI, et al. The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia 2007;27(3):193‐210. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‐2982.2007.01288.x]

Tramèr 1997

Tramèr MR, Reynolds DJM, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Impact of covert duplicate results on meta‐analysis: a case study. BMJ 1997;315(7109):635‐9. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.635]

Vane 1971

Vane JR. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis as a mechanism of action for aspirin‐like drugs. Nature: New Biology 1971;231(25):232‐5. [PUBMED: 5284360]

Verhagen 2006

Verhagen AP, Damen L, Berger MY, Passchier J, Merlin V, Koes BW. Is any one analgesic superior for episodic tension‐type headache?. Journal of Family Practice 2006;55(12):1064‐72. [PUBMED: 17137543]

Veys 2016

Veys L, Derry S, Moore RA. Ketoprofen for episodic tension‐type headache in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012190.pub2]

Vos 2012

Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990‐2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380(9859):2163‐96. [DOI: 10.1016/S0140‐6736(12)61729‐2]

WHO 2015

World Health Organization. WHO model list of essential medicines, 19th list. www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/en/index.html (accessed 6 September 16).

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Gatoulis 2012

Methods

R, DB, PC, parallel groups

Single episode treated with one of the study interventions when PI ≥ moderate

Participants

Episodic TTH (IHS criteria) for ≥ 1 year, 2 to 10 episodes/month

Excluded: unable to differentiate migraine or migraine frequency > 1/month

N = 559 (487 for efficacy)

M 183, F 304

Mean age 37 years (range 18 to 66)

Baseline pain ≥ moderate

Interventions

Aspirin 1000 mg, n = 223

Paracetamol 300 mg + codeine 30 mg, n = 233

Placebo, n = 103

Rescue medication: usual product at usual dose (no time limit specified)

Outcomes

PI: 4‐point categorical scale

PR: 5‐point categorical scale over 4 h

SPID over 4 h

TOTPAR over 4 h

PID over 4 h

Use of rescue medication

AEs

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R = 1, DB = 2, W = 1. Total = 4/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of sequence generation not reported

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of allocation concealment not reported

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Appears to use DD method with aspirin and placebo caplets and paracetamol and placebo capsules

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Appears to use DD method with aspirin and placebo caplets and paracetamol and placebo capsules

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Withdrawals mainly due to non‐compliance with study protocol, and not equal between groups. Does not affect safety results, but imputation method not mentioned for efficacy results ‐ did not contribute to meta‐analysis

Size

Unclear risk

103 participants in placebo treatment group

Göbel 2001

Methods

R, DB, AC and PC, cross‐over study

4 episodes treated, 1 with each study medication

Participants

Tension headache (IHS)

Age range 18 to 65 years

N = 44 (completers, included in analysis)

Interventions

Aspirin 1000 mg

Peppermint oil (oleum menthae piperitae) solution Ll 170, 10 g

Placebo

Application of solution on forehead and temples, repeated 15 and 30 minutes after start of treatment

Outcomes

PI: 5‐point scale (0 to 4)

AEs

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R = 2, DB = 2, W = 1. Total = 5/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Balanced randomisation using Latin squares

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of allocation concealment not reported

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Capsules of identical appearance, placebo solution masked by adding traces of peppermint oil

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Capsules of identical appearance, placebo solution masked by adding traces of peppermint oil

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Completer analysis

Size

High risk

< 50 participants per treatment group

Martínez‐Martín 2001

Methods

R, DB, AC and PC, parallel groups

Single dose of one intervention to treat each of 2 attacks

Participants

Episodic TTH (IHS criteria), 2 to 15 episodes/month, previous PR with a non‐opioid analgesic

Age range 18 to 65 years

Excluded: allergy or hypersensitivity or contraindication to study drugs; pregnant/breastfeeding; history alcohol or drug misuse; headache correlated with hormone contraception

N = 360 (326 treated both attacks)

M 89, F 271

Baseline pain ≥ moderate (mean 5.7/10)

Interventions

Aspirin 1000 mg, n = 91

Metamizole 500 mg, n = 82

Metamizole 1000 mg, n = 92

Placebo, n = 91

Rescue medication after 2 h if required

Outcomes

PI: 4‐point categorical scale over 4 h

PR: 5‐point categorical scale over 4 h

TOTPAR4

PGE: 4‐point categorical scale at 4 h

Use of rescue medication

AEs

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R = 2, DB = 2, W = 1. Total = 5/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer generated

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of allocation concealment not reported

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"using the double‐dummy technique"

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"using the double‐dummy technique"

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No mention of imputation, unclear how data from two attacks was combined

Size

Unclear risk

50 to 199 participants per treatment arm (82 to 92)

Peters 1983

Methods

R, DB, PC, parallel‐group trial

Single episode treated with one dose of study medication when pain was ≥ moderate intensity

Participants

Headache (tension and tension‐vascular) clinically moderately severe, impairing efficiency, previously responsive to OTC medication: divided into tension headache and tension‐vascular headache

Excluded: significant medical history; history other headache type; headache severe enough to render bed bound; intolerance to study medications

N = 307 completed study (269 evaluated)

M 53, F 216 (evaluated participants)

Mean age 32 years

Baseline pain moderately severe

Interventions

Aspirin 650 mg, n = 90

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 87

Placebo, n = 92

No rescue medication allowed for 6 h

Outcomes

PI: 3‐point scale over 6 h

PR: 4‐point scale over 6 h

AEs

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R = 1, DB = 2, W = 0. Total = 3/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Details of randomisation method not reported

Participants not randomised according to type of headache

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not reported

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

DD method. "The tablets of each size were identical in appearance"

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

DD method. "The tablets of each size were identical in appearance"

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

May be participants randomised who did not complete. Attrition > 10% due to protocol violations, no mention of discontinuations by headache type or of imputation

Size

Unclear risk

50 to 199 participants per treatment arm (87 to 92)

Steiner 2003

Methods

R, DB, PC, parallel‐group study

Single episode treated with one dose of study medication when pain was ≥ moderate intensity, 1 to 12 h after onset of headache

Participants

Episodic tension headache (IHS), < 15/month

Excluded: migraine; pregnant/breastfeeding; history gastrointestinal ulcer/haemorrhage; history alcohol or medication misuse

N = 542

M:F ratio about 30:70

Mean age 40 years (SD 12; range 16 to 65 years)

Mean baseline pain ≥ 57/100 (median ≥ 60/100)

Interventions

Aspirin 500 mg, n = 111

Aspirin 1000 mg, n = 103

Paracetamol 500 mg, n = 105

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 111

Placebo, n = 112

Rescue medication allowed after 2 h

Outcomes

PI: 100 mm VAS

PR: 7‐point scale

Functional ability: 4‐point scale, and time to return to normal function

PGE: 5‐point scale

AEs

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R = 2, DB = 2, W = 1. Total = 5/5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"Computer generated list"

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Assigned in numerical sequence

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

DD method

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

DD method

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

ITT analysis reported, with LOCF imputation

Size

Unclear risk

50 to 199 participants per treatment arm (103 to 112)

AC: active controlled; AE: adverse event; DB: double‐blind; DD: double‐dummy; F: female; h: hour; IHS: International Headache Society; ITT: intention to treat; LOCF: last observation carried forward; M: male; N: number of participants in study; n: number of participants in treatment arm; OTC: over‐the‐counter; PC: placebo controlled; PGE: Patient Global Evaluation; PI: pain intensity; PID: pain intensity difference; PR: pain relief; R: randomised; SD: standard deviation; SPID: summed pain intensity difference; TOTPAR: total pain relief; TTH: tension‐type headache; VAS: visual analogue scale; W: withdrawals.

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Diamond 1983

Mean headache frequency > 15 days per month (chronic TTH)

Diener 2005

84% of participants had migraine; no separate results for TTH

Glassman 1982

Testing effect of adding tranquilliser to aspirin

Langemark 1987

Mean headache frequency at upper limit (15/month)

NCT01552798

Study terminated, only 9 participants enrolled, no results posted

Nebe 1995

Not stated to be randomised

Ryan 1977

No diagnostic criteria reported, headache frequency unclear (> 1/month) so could include chronic TTH

von Graffenried 1980

No diagnostic criteria reported, included participants with 'vascular headache'

TTH: tension‐type headache.

Characteristics of studies awaiting assessment [ordered by study ID]

NCT01464983

Methods

R, DB (DD), AC and PC, parallel groups

Participants

Episodic TTH (diagnostic criteria provided, compatible with IHS), aged 18 to 65 years, men and women

N = 1115

Interventions

Aspirin 500 mg

Aspirin 1000 mg

Ibuprofen 200 mg

Ibuprofen 400 mg

Placebo

Rescue medication: paracetamol

Outcomes

Meaningful relief at 2 h

PR: categorical scale, to 4 h

PGE at 24 h

AEs

Notes

Completed, no results posted

Request sent to Bayer for further information 30 August 2016; no response as of 15 September 2016

AC: active controlled; AE: adverse event; DB: double‐blind; DD: double‐dummy; h: hour; IHS: International Headache Society; PC: placebo controlled; PGE: Patient Global Evaluation; PR: pain relief; R: randomised; TTH: tension‐type headache.

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants using rescue medication Show forest plot

2

397

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.31, 0.70]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants using rescue medication.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants using rescue medication.

2 Participant global evaluation: 'satisfied' Show forest plot

2

397

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.47 [1.18, 1.83]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participant global evaluation: 'satisfied'.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participant global evaluation: 'satisfied'.

3 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

3

723

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.75, 1.53]

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Participants with any adverse event.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Aspirin 500 mg or 650 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

2

405

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.77, 2.02]

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Aspirin 500 mg or 650 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 2 Aspirin 500 mg or 650 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with any adverse event.

Study flow diagram.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants using rescue medication.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants using rescue medication.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participant global evaluation: 'satisfied'.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participant global evaluation: 'satisfied'.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Participants with any adverse event.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 2 Aspirin 500 mg or 650 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with any adverse event.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Aspirin 500 mg or 650 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with any adverse event.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Aspirin 1000 mg compared with placebo for episodic tension‐type headache

Aspirin 1000 mg compared with placebo for episodic tension‐type headache

Patient or population: adults with episodic tension‐type headache

Settings: community

Intervention: aspirin 1000 mg

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Outcome with
comparator

Outcome with
intervention

RR
(95% CI)

NNT, NNTp or NNH (95% CI)

No of studies, participants, events

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Pain‐free at 2 hours

No data

No data

Very low

No data

Pain‐free at other time points (1, 4, 24 hours)

No data

No data

Very low

No data

Pain‐free or mild pain at 2 hours

61/112

78/103

Not calculated

1 study, 215 participants, 139 events

Very low

Downgraded three levels due to sparse data: single study with 215 participants in comparison

Use of rescue medication

310 in 1000

140 in 1000

RR 0.47 (0.31 to 0.70)

NNTp 6.0 (4.1 to 12)

2 studies, 397 participants, 91 events

Low

Downgraded two levels due to sparse data: small number of studies, participants and events

Patient Global Evaluation at end of study

370 in 1000

550 in 1000

RR 1.5 (1.2 to 1.8)

NNT 5.7 (3.7 to 12)

2 studies, 397 participants, 181 events

Very low

Downgraded three levels due to sparse data: small number of studies, participants, differences in scales and timing for the outcome, and post‐hoc nature of the analysis

Any adverse event

140 in 1000

160 in 1000

RR 1.1 (0.75 to 1.5)

NNH not calculated

3 studies, 723 participants, 107 events

Low

Downgraded two levels due to sparse data: small number of studies and events

Specific adverse events

Inconsistently reported and too few events for analysis

Included gastrointestinal upset or dyspepsia, nausea, dizziness, and somnolence

4 studies, 767 participants

Very low

Downgraded three levels due to sparse data: small number of studies, few events, inconsistent reporting

Serious adverse events

No events reported

No events reported

4 studies, 767 participants, no events

Very low

Downgraded three levels due to sparse data: small number of studies and no events

CI: confidence interval; NNH: number needed to treat for one additional harmful outcome; NNT: number needed to treat for one additional beneficial outcome; NNTp: number needed to treat to prevent one outcome; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence (EPOC 2015).

High: this research provides a very good indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is low.

Moderate: this research provides a good indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is moderate.

Low: this research provides some indication of the likely effect. However, the likelihood that it will be substantially different is high.

Very low: this research does not provide a reliable indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is very high.

Substantially different: a large enough difference that it might affect a decision.

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Aspirin 1000 mg compared with placebo for episodic tension‐type headache
Comparison 1. Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants using rescue medication Show forest plot

2

397

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.31, 0.70]

2 Participant global evaluation: 'satisfied' Show forest plot

2

397

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.47 [1.18, 1.83]

3 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

3

723

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.75, 1.53]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo
Comparison 2. Aspirin 500 mg or 650 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

2

405

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.77, 2.02]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Aspirin 500 mg or 650 mg versus placebo