Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Study flow diagram.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants using rescue medication.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants using rescue medication.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participant global evaluation: 'satisfied'.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participant global evaluation: 'satisfied'.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Participants with any adverse event.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 2 Aspirin 500 mg or 650 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with any adverse event.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Aspirin 500 mg or 650 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with any adverse event.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Aspirin 1000 mg compared with placebo for episodic tension‐type headache

Aspirin 1000 mg compared with placebo for episodic tension‐type headache

Patient or population: adults with episodic tension‐type headache

Settings: community

Intervention: aspirin 1000 mg

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Outcome with
comparator

Outcome with
intervention

RR
(95% CI)

NNT, NNTp or NNH (95% CI)

No of studies, participants, events

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Pain‐free at 2 hours

No data

No data

Very low

No data

Pain‐free at other time points (1, 4, 24 hours)

No data

No data

Very low

No data

Pain‐free or mild pain at 2 hours

61/112

78/103

Not calculated

1 study, 215 participants, 139 events

Very low

Downgraded three levels due to sparse data: single study with 215 participants in comparison

Use of rescue medication

310 in 1000

140 in 1000

RR 0.47 (0.31 to 0.70)

NNTp 6.0 (4.1 to 12)

2 studies, 397 participants, 91 events

Low

Downgraded two levels due to sparse data: small number of studies, participants and events

Patient Global Evaluation at end of study

370 in 1000

550 in 1000

RR 1.5 (1.2 to 1.8)

NNT 5.7 (3.7 to 12)

2 studies, 397 participants, 181 events

Very low

Downgraded three levels due to sparse data: small number of studies, participants, differences in scales and timing for the outcome, and post‐hoc nature of the analysis

Any adverse event

140 in 1000

160 in 1000

RR 1.1 (0.75 to 1.5)

NNH not calculated

3 studies, 723 participants, 107 events

Low

Downgraded two levels due to sparse data: small number of studies and events

Specific adverse events

Inconsistently reported and too few events for analysis

Included gastrointestinal upset or dyspepsia, nausea, dizziness, and somnolence

4 studies, 767 participants

Very low

Downgraded three levels due to sparse data: small number of studies, few events, inconsistent reporting

Serious adverse events

No events reported

No events reported

4 studies, 767 participants, no events

Very low

Downgraded three levels due to sparse data: small number of studies and no events

CI: confidence interval; NNH: number needed to treat for one additional harmful outcome; NNT: number needed to treat for one additional beneficial outcome; NNTp: number needed to treat to prevent one outcome; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence (EPOC 2015).

High: this research provides a very good indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is low.

Moderate: this research provides a good indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is moderate.

Low: this research provides some indication of the likely effect. However, the likelihood that it will be substantially different is high.

Very low: this research does not provide a reliable indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is very high.

Substantially different: a large enough difference that it might affect a decision.

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Aspirin 1000 mg compared with placebo for episodic tension‐type headache
Comparison 1. Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants using rescue medication Show forest plot

2

397

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.31, 0.70]

2 Participant global evaluation: 'satisfied' Show forest plot

2

397

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.47 [1.18, 1.83]

3 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

3

723

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.75, 1.53]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Aspirin 1000 mg versus placebo
Comparison 2. Aspirin 500 mg or 650 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

2

405

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.77, 2.02]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Aspirin 500 mg or 650 mg versus placebo