Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Aromaterapia para el tratamiento de las náuseas y los vómitos posoperatorios

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007598.pub2Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 18 April 2012see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Anaesthesia Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Sonia Hines

    Correspondence to: Mater Nursing Research Centre, Queensland Centre for Evidence‐Based Nursing & Midwifery, A Collaborating Centre of the Joanna Briggs Institute, South Brisbane, Australia

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Elizabeth Steels

    Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian College of Natural Medicine, Brisbane, Australia

  • Anne Chang

    Mater Nursing Research Centre, Queensland Centre for Evidence‐Based Nursing & Midwifery, A Collaborating Centre of the Joanna Briggs Institute, South Brisbane, Australia

  • Kristen Gibbons

    Clinical Research Support Unit, Mater Medical Research Institute, South Brisbane, Australia

Contributions of authors

Conceiving the review: Sonia Hines (SH)

Designing the review: SH

Co‐ordinating the review: SH

Undertaking manual searches: SH

Screening search results: SH, Elizabeth Steels (ES)

Organizing retrieval of papers: SH

Screening retrieved papers against inclusion criteria: SH, ES

Appraising quality of papers: SH, ES, Anne Chang (AC)

Abstracting data from papers: SH, ES, Kirsten Gibbons (KG)

Writing to authors of papers for additional information: SH

Providing additional data about papers: SH, AC

Obtaining and screening data from unpublished studies: SH, ES

Data management for the review: SH

Entering data into Review Manager (RevMan 5.1): SH, KG

Analysis of data: SH, ES, KG

Interpretation of data: SH, ES, AC, KG

Writing the review: SH, AC, KG

Securing funding for the review: SH

Performing previous work that was the foundation of the present study: SH

Guarantor for the review (one author): SH

Statistical analysis: KG, AC

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Nursing Research Centre, Mater Health Services, Australia.

    Time and facilities.

External sources

  • Queensland Health, Australia.

    Nursing and Midwifery Research Grant ($5906) awarded to Sonia Hines

Declarations of interest

Sonia Hines: Queensland Health Nursing and Midwifery Research Grant received by Sonia Hines to assist with the conduct of the review (AUD 5906). The granting body had no influence on the findings of this review.

All other authors: no conflict of interest is known.

Acknowledgements

We thank Mathew Zacharias, Jung T Kim, NL Pace, Peter Kranke and Anne Lyddiatt for their help and advice during the preparation of the systematic review.

We also thank Mathew Zacharias, Katrina Farber, Milli Reddy, Jung T Kim and Janet Wale for their help and editorial advice during the preparation of the protocol for the systematic review.

The authors wish to acknowledge Kathy Hibberd (Librarian, University of Queensland Medical Library) for her invaluable assistance in preparing and conducting the searches for this review, and Leandra Blake for her comments on the protocol and review. We also thank Kate Kynoch and Lisa Brown for assisting with the testing of the data extraction tool.

Thanks to Marie Kristensson for the Swedish translations, Abbas Breesem for the Farsi translation, and Laurie Bay at the Institute of Modern Languages at the University of Queensland for the French translation.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Mar 10

Aromatherapy for treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting

Review

Sonia Hines, Elizabeth Steels, Anne Chang, Kristen Gibbons

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007598.pub3

2012 Apr 18

Aromatherapy for treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting

Review

Sonia Hines, Elizabeth Steels, Anne Chang, Kristen Gibbons

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007598.pub2

2009 Jan 21

Aromatherapy for treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting

Protocol

Sonia Hines, Elizabeth Steels, Anne Chang, Kristen Gibbons

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007598

Differences between protocol and review

The original protocol stated "We will judge the study quality using a validated critical appraisal checklist developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and based on the work of The Cochrane Collaboration and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (Figure 2). This checklist assesses selection, allocation, treatment, and attrition biases". Due to changes in the Cochrane requirements, we have used the Cochrane risk of bias assessment instead.

We had originally planned to search the website http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/nics/asp/index.asp, however this no longer exists and http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/nics/index.htm was searched instead.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.