Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Distintos derivados de antraciclina para la reducción de la cardiotoxicidad en pacientes con cáncer

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005006.pub2Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 18 October 2006see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Elvira C van Dalen

    Correspondence to: Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital / Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    [email protected]

  • Erna MC Michiels

    Paediatric Oncology, Erasmus MC‐Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands

  • Huib N Caron

    Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital / Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Leontien CM Kremer

    Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital / Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Contributions of authors

Elvira van Dalen designed the study and wrote the review. She developed the search strategy and undertook the searches. She searched for unpublished and ongoing studies and identified the studies meeting the inclusion criteria. She performed the data‐extraction and quality assessment of the included studies. She analyzed the data and interpreted the results. She wrote and revised the manuscript.

Erna Michiels identified the studies meeting the inclusion criteria. She performed the data‐extraction and quality assessment of the included studies. She critically reviewed the manuscript.

Huib Caron critically reviewed the review. He contributed to the data‐analysis and the interpretation of the results. He critically reviewed the manuscript.

Leontien Kremer designed the study and critically reviewed the review. She performed the data‐extraction and quality assessment of the included studies. She contributed to the data‐analysis and the interpretation of the results. She critically reviewed the manuscript.

All authors approved the final version.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Dutch Cochrane Centre, Netherlands.

External sources

  • Foundation of Pediatric Cancer Research (SKK) Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Declaraciones de interés

available in

Desconocidos

Agradecimientos

available in

Se agradece a Heleen van der Pal por su ayuda en la preparación del protocolo de esta revisión. También se agradece a Leon Bax por traducir los artículos en japonés. Finalmente, se agradece a los financiadores por el apoyo económico que permitió realizar esta revisión sistemática.
Para la comparación de epirrubicina versus doxorrubicina, el cociente de riesgos instantáneos y las estadísticas asociadas se calcularon mediante una hoja de cálculo de Excel desarrollada por Matthew Sydes (Cancer Division) en colaboración con el Meta‐analysis Group of the MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Londres.
Para la comparación de doxorrubicina y doxorrubicina encapsulada en liposomas, el cociente de riesgos instantáneos y las estadísticas asociadas se calcularon mediante una hoja de cálculo de Excel proporcionada por Heather Dickinson.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2010 May 12

Different anthracycline derivates for reducing cardiotoxicity in cancer patients

Review

Elvira C van Dalen, Erna MC Michiels, Huib N Caron, Leontien CM Kremer

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005006.pub4

2010 Mar 17

Different anthracycline derivates for reducing cardiotoxicity in cancer patients

Review

Elvira C van Dalen, Erna MC Michiels, Huib N Caron, Leontien CM Kremer

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005006.pub3

2006 Oct 18

Different anthracycline derivates for reducing cardiotoxicity in cancer patients

Review

Elvira C van Dalen, Erna MC Michiels, Huib N Caron, Leontien CM Kremer

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005006.pub2

2004 Jan 26

Different anthracycline derivates for reducing cardiotoxicity in cancer patients

Protocol

Elvira C van Dalen, Heleen van der Pal, Leontien C.M. Kremer

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005006

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.