Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological therapies for women who experience intimate partner violence

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013017Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 15 mayo 2018see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Trastornos mentales comunes

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Melissa Tan

    Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

  • Lorna O'Doherty

    Centre for Advances in Behavioural Science, Coventry University, Coventry, UK

  • Gail Gilchrist

    Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, London, UK

  • Angela Taft

    The Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

  • Gene Feder

    Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

  • Judit Tirado Muñoz

    Addiction Research Group, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona, Spain

  • Patty Chondros

    Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

  • Laura Sadowski

    Department of Medicine, Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, USA

  • Kelsey Hegarty

    Correspondencia a: Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    [email protected]

    The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

Contributions of authors

Drafting of protocol – MT, KH, LOD, GF, GG, JT, AT, JR, LS and PC

Search strategy – MT and KH

Selection of studies – MT, LOD, JT and KH

Extraction of data – MT, LOD, GG, JT and KH

Data entry into RevMan – JT

Analysis and interpretation of analysis – JT and PC

Drafting of review – MT, KH, LOD, GF, GG, JT, AT, JR, LS and PC

Topic expertise and editing ‐ MT, KH, LOD, GF, GG, JT, AT, JR, LS and PC

Updating of review – MT & KH

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • The University of Melbourne, Australia.

    Support for MT

External sources

  • Australian General Practice Training, Australia.

    Funding support for MT

Declarations of interest

KH: Lead investigator of WEAVE trial (Recent randomised trial of screening and intervention for IPV)

LOD: Co‐investigator WEAVE trial

AT: Co‐investigator WEAVE trial

PC: Co‐investigator WEAVE trial

GF: Principal investigator PATH trial, co‐investigator WEAVE trial, chair of the WHO intimate partner violence and sexual assault guidelines development group and chair of the UK NICE domestic violence programme development group

Acknowledgements

The review authors thank the editorial team of the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Group (CCMD) for providing guidance during the development of the protocol. Search strategies were developed in collaboration with CCMD's Information Specialist.

CRG Funding Acknowledgement:
The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) is the largest single funder of the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Group. 

Disclaimer:
The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Jul 01

Psychological therapies for women who experience intimate partner violence

Review

Mohajer Hameed, Lorna O'Doherty, Gail Gilchrist, Judit Tirado-Muñoz, Angela Taft, Patty Chondros, Gene Feder, Melissa Tan, Kelsey Hegarty

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013017.pub2

2018 May 15

Psychological therapies for women who experience intimate partner violence

Protocol

Melissa Tan, Lorna O'Doherty, Gail Gilchrist, Angela Taft, Gene Feder, Judit Tirado Muñoz, Patty Chondros, Laura Sadowski, Kelsey Hegarty

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013017

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.