Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strategies for identifying familial hypercholesterolaemia in non‐specialist clinical settings

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 07 octubre 2021

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012985Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 20 marzo 2018see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Fibrosis quística y enfermedades genéticas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Nadeem Qureshi

    Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Stephen F Weng

    Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Jennifer A Tranter

    Correspondencia a: Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

    [email protected]

  • Maria L Da Silva

    Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Joe Kai

    Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Jo Leonardi‐Bee

    Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Contributions of authors

Roles and Responsibilities

Protocol stage: (draft the protocol): NQ, JK, SW, J LB, JT, MD

Review stage: (select studies for inclusion): NQ, JT, MD, J LB

Review stage: (data extraction): SW, JT, MD, J LB

Review stage: JT, MD (contact authors for additional information)

Review stage: (enter data into ReVMan) JT, SW

Review stage: (carry out analysis) NQ, SW, J LB

Review stage: (interpretation of data) NQ, SW, JK, J LB

Review stage: (writing the final review) NQ, JK, SW, J LB, JT, MD

Update stage: (update the review) NQ, SW, JT

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • National Institute for Health Research, UK.

    This systematic review was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group.

  • Nottingham City Clinical Commissioning Group, UK.

Declarations of interest

All authors: none known.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Nottingham City Clinical Commissioning Group for commissioning and funding this review as part of a programme grant development award. The authors would also like to thank Dr Christopher Respinger for his contribution to the drafting of the section of the review: why it is important to do this review.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Oct 07

Strategies for screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care and other community settings

Review

Nadeem Qureshi, Maria Luisa R Da Silva, Hasidah Abdul-Hamid, Stephen F Weng, Joe Kai, Jo Leonardi-Bee

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012985.pub2

2018 Mar 20

Strategies for identifying familial hypercholesterolaemia in non‐specialist clinical settings

Protocol

Nadeem Qureshi, Stephen F Weng, Jennifer A Tranter, Maria L Da Silva, Joe Kai, Jo Leonardi‐Bee

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012985

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Humans;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.