Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Sulfato de magnesio para el tratamiento de la bronquiolitis aguda en niños de hasta dos años de edad

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012965.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 14 diciembre 2020see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Infecciones respiratorias agudas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Sudha Chandelia

    Correspondencia a: Pediatric Emergency and Critical Care, PGIMER and Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi, India

    [email protected]

  • Dinesh Kumar

    Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, PGIMER, Delhi, India

  • Neelima Chadha

    PGIMER Library, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India

  • Nishant Jaiswal

    ICMR Advanced Centre for Evidence-Based Child Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Contributions of authors

Dr Sudha Chandelia (SC): conceptualised, designed the search strategy, performed the literature search, screened search results, screened and retrieved papers against eligibility criteria, collected and extracted data, obtained and screened data on unpublished studies, entered data into RevMan 5, conducted data analysis and interpretation, assessed certainty of evidence, co‐ordinated the review, wrote and drafted the review.

Dr Dinesh Kumar (DK): provided intellectual input for the background, screened search results, retrieved and screened papers against eligibility criteria, conducted data extraction, and assessed certainty of evidence.

Ms Neelima Chadha (NC): provided intellectual input into the development of the search strategy, literature search; and provided full‐text articles.

Nishant Jaiswal (NJ): provided intellectual input for 'Risk of bias' assessment, reported and wrote revised drafts of the review, provided intellectual input and guidance for GRADE application.

All authors reviewed and approved the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • PGIMER and Dr RML Hospital, New Delhi and PGIMER, Chandigarh, India

    Library and Internet facility

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

SC: None known
DK: None known
NC: None known
NJ: None known

Acknowledgements

We thank Khalid Ansari and Mehmat Kose for their gracious assistance in providing additional data and responding to our questions (Alansari 2019; Kose 2019). We thank Arun K Yadav for his support and help in this review. We thank Dr Kalpana Kumari and Dr Rahul Teotia for their help with analyses.

The Methods section of the protocol for this review was based on a standard template developed by Cochrane Airways, and adapted by the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group.

We would also like to acknowledge the reviewers, Professor David Isaacs, University of Sydney, Australia and Linjie Zhang, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande, Brazil for giving us valuable suggestions and comments. We acknowledge Anne Lyddiatt and Dee Schneiderman, the consumer reviewers, for providing valuable suggestions during the course of peer review. We also acknowledge the contact editor, Lubna Al‐Ansary, and statistical editor, Conor Teljeur, for giving their valuable time to this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Dec 14

Magnesium sulphate for treating acute bronchiolitis in children up to two years of age

Review

Sudha Chandelia, Dinesh Kumar, Neelima Chadha, Nishant Jaiswal

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012965.pub2

2018 Feb 20

Magnesium sulphate for acute bronchiolitis in children under two years of age

Protocol

Sudha Chandelia, Arun K Yadav, Dinesh Kumar, Neelima Chadha

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012965

Differences between protocol and review

  1. In the protocol, we planned to include non‐randomised controlled trials (non‐RCTs), as we were expecting to identify few studies. In the review, we only included RCTs, as we did not identify any non‐RCTs.

  2. We added the primary outcome, time to recovery, as it is a person‐centred, and clinically important outcome, likely to be modified by the treatment.

  3. In the protocol, the primary outcome, clinical severity score, had four components: clinical severity score measured using any validated scoring system, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of hospital stay, or duration of intensive care unit stay. These could not be described under one outcome. Therefore, we separated these into four outcomes. We moved 'clinical severity score' to the secondary outcomes.

  4. We did not specify time points of clinical severity score in the protocol. Clinical severity scoring was conducted at multiple time points amongst the studies. Therefore, we specified the time points of clinical severity score at 0 to 24 hours, and 25 to 48 hours after treatment for the review.

  5. There was a change in authorship: Arun K Yadav, an author on the protocol, did not co‐author the review.

  6. We planned to meta‐analyse using the random‐effects model, as we anticipated the studies would differ. We used the fixed‐effect model to calculate effect size and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) when we could not pool results, and included only one study for comparison.

  7. We planned to conduct sensitivity and subgroup analyses. However, there were insufficient data.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each 'Risk of bias' item for each included study

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each 'Risk of bias' item for each included study

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each 'Risk of bias' item, presented as percentages across all included studies

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each 'Risk of bias' item, presented as percentages across all included studies

Comparison 1: Magnesium sulphate compared with placebo for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 1: Clinical severity score at 0 to 24 hours after treatment

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Magnesium sulphate compared with placebo for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 1: Clinical severity score at 0 to 24 hours after treatment

Comparison 1: Magnesium sulphate compared with placebo for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 2: Clinical severity score at 25 to 48 hours after treatment

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: Magnesium sulphate compared with placebo for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 2: Clinical severity score at 25 to 48 hours after treatment

Comparison 1: Magnesium sulphate compared with placebo for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 3: Hospital readmission rate within 30 days of discharge

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: Magnesium sulphate compared with placebo for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 3: Hospital readmission rate within 30 days of discharge

Comparison 2: Magnesium sulphate compared with hypertonic saline for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 1: Duration of hospital stay

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2: Magnesium sulphate compared with hypertonic saline for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 1: Duration of hospital stay

Comparison 2: Magnesium sulphate compared with hypertonic saline for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 2: Clinical severity score at 25 to 48 hours after treatment

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2: Magnesium sulphate compared with hypertonic saline for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 2: Clinical severity score at 25 to 48 hours after treatment

Comparison 3: Magnesium sulphate + epinephrine compared with no treatment or normal saline + epinephrine for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 1: Duration of hospital stay

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3: Magnesium sulphate + epinephrine compared with no treatment or normal saline + epinephrine for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 1: Duration of hospital stay

Comparison 3: Magnesium sulphate + epinephrine compared with no treatment or normal saline + epinephrine for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 2: Clinical severity score at 0 to 24 hour after treatment

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3: Magnesium sulphate + epinephrine compared with no treatment or normal saline + epinephrine for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 2: Clinical severity score at 0 to 24 hour after treatment

Comparison 3: Magnesium sulphate + epinephrine compared with no treatment or normal saline + epinephrine for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 3: Clinical severity score at 25 to 48 hour after treatment

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3: Magnesium sulphate + epinephrine compared with no treatment or normal saline + epinephrine for acute bronchiolitis in children, Outcome 3: Clinical severity score at 25 to 48 hour after treatment

Summary of findings 1. Magnesium sulphate compared with placebo for acute bronchiolitis in children

Magnesium sulphate versus placebo for acute bronchiolitis in children

Patient or population: children up to 18 months old with acute bronchiolitis

Settings: short stay unit, paediatric emergency department

Intervention: magnesium sulphate

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Magnesium sulphate

Time to recovery

Outcome not measured

Mortality

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

160
(1 RCT)

See comment

Trial authors confirmed there were no deaths in either group (personal communication)

Adverse events

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

160
(1 RCT)

See comment

Neither group reported adverse effects, such as apnoea, cyanosis, or haemodynamic instability

Duration of hospital stay

Geometric mean time to discharge was 25.3 hours in the placebo group.

Geometric mean time to discharge was 24.1 hours in the magnesium sulphate group.

Not estimable

160
(1 RCT)

See comment

Results were taken directly from the published report.

Clinical severity score (CSS)

(Wang score; range 0 to 12; higher = poorer outcome)
measured at 0 to 24 hours
after treatment

The mean (SD) CSS at 24 hours in the placebo group was 4.55 points (1.62)

The mean CSS at 24 hours in the magnesium sulphate group was 0.13 points higher (0.28 lower to 0.54 higher)

MD 0.13, (‐0.28 to 0.54)

160
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝

very lowa

Clinical severity score (CSS)

(Wang score; range 0 to 12; higher = poorer outcome)
measured at 25 to 48 hours
after treatment

The mean (SD) CSS at 48 hours in the placebo group was 4.84 points (1.57)

The mean CSS at 48 hours in the magnesium sulphate group was 0.42 points lower (0.84 lower to 0)

MD ‐0.42, (‐0.84 to

‐0.00)

160
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝

very lowa

Hospital re‐admission within 30 days of discharge

(re‐admissions were reported at 14 days)

62 per 1000

195 per 1000

RR 3.16
(1.20 to 8.27)

158
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowb

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; MD: mean difference; SD: standard deviation; RCT: randomised controlled trial

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality. Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality. Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality. Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality. We are very uncertain about the estimate.

aWe downgraded the quality of the evidence to very low for indirectness and very serious imprecision (1 study, small sample size, wide confidence intervals).
bWe downgraded the quality of the evidence to low for indirectness and serious imprecision (1 study, small sample size).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 1. Magnesium sulphate compared with placebo for acute bronchiolitis in children
Summary of findings 2. Magnesium sulphate compared with hypertonic saline for acute bronchiolitis in children

Magnesium sulphate versus hypertonic saline for acute bronchiolitis in children

Patient or population: children up to 12 months old with acute bronchiolitis

Settings: single‐centre, emergency department, paediatric intensive care unit and wards

Intervention: magnesium sulphate

Comparison: hypertonic saline

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Hypertonic saline

Magnesium sulphate

Time to recovery

Outcome not measured

Mortality

Outcome not measured

Adverse events

Outcome not measured

Duration of hospital stay

The mean (SD) duration of hospital stay in the hypertonic saline group was 3.2 days (1.0)

The mean duration of hospital stay in the magnesium sulphate group was 3.2 days (0.28 lower to 0.28 higher)

MD 0.00

(‐0.28 to 0.28)

220

(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very lowa

Clinical severity score (CSS)

(RDAI score; range 0 to 17; higher = poorer outcomes)

measured at 0 to 24 hours
after treatment

Outcome not measured

Clinical severity score (CSS)

(RDAI score; range 0 to 17; higher = poorer outcomes)

measured at 25 to 48 hours
after treatment

The mean (SD) CSS at 48 hours in the hypertonic saline group was 3.7 points (1.8)

The mean CSS at 48 hours in the magnesium sulphate group was 0.10 points higher (0.39 lower to 0.59 higher)

MD 0.10 (‐0.39 to 0.59)

220
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very lowa

Hospital re‐admission within 30 days of discharge

Outcome not measured

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; SD: standard deviation; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RADI: respiratory distress assessment instrument

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality. Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality. Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality. Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality. We are very uncertain about the estimate.

aWe downgraded the quality of the evidence to very low for indirectness and very serious imprecision (1 study, small sample size).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Magnesium sulphate compared with hypertonic saline for acute bronchiolitis in children
Summary of findings 3. Magnesium sulphate or magnesium sulphate + salbutamol compared with salbutamol for acute bronchiolitis in children

Magnesium sulphate or magnesium sulphate + salbutamol versus salbutamol for acute bronchiolitis in children

Patient or population: children from 1 month to 24 months old with acute bronchiolitis

Settings: single‐centre, short‐stay unit, paediatric emergency department

Intervention: magnesium sulphate or magnesium sulphate + salbutamol

Comparison: salbutamol

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Salbutamol

Magnesium sulphate or magnesium sulphate + salbutamol

Time to recovery

Outcome not measured

Mortality

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

56
(1 RCT)a

No deaths occurred in any of the groups (personal communication)

Adverse events

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

56
(1 RCT)a

There were no instances of adverse effects, such as hypotension, arrhythmias, or loss of deep tendon reflexes reported in any of the groups.

Duration of hospital stay

The mean duration of hospital stay in the salbutamol group was 24 hours (95% CI 23.4 to 76.9).

The mean duration of hospital stay in the magnesium sulphate group was 24 hours (95% CI 25.8 to 47.4).

The mean duration of hospital stay for the magnesium sulphate + salbutamol group was 20 hours (95% CI 15.3 to 39.0).

Not estimable

56
(1 RCT)a

Results were taken directly from the published report.

Clinical severity score (CSS)

(Wang score; range 0 to 12; higher = poorer outcome)

measured at 0 to 24 hours
after treatment

Outcome not measured

Clinical severity score (CSS)

(Wang score; range 0 to 12; higher = poorer outcome)

measured 25 to 48 hours
after treatment

Outcome not measured

Hospital re‐admission within 30 days of discharge

Outcome not measured

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; MD: mean difference; SD: standard deviation; RCT: randomised controlled trial

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality. Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality. Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality. Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality. We are very uncertain about the estimate.

a3‐arm trial: magnesium sulphate group (19 children), magnesium sulphate plus salbutamol (19 children), salbutamol (18 children)

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Magnesium sulphate or magnesium sulphate + salbutamol compared with salbutamol for acute bronchiolitis in children
Summary of findings 4. Magnesium sulphate + epinephrine compared with no treatment or normal saline + epinephrine

Magnesium sulphate + epinephrine versus no treatment or normal saline + epinephrine

Patient or population: children up to 12 months old with acute bronchiolitis

Settings: 3 paediatric departments of 3 hospitals

Intervention: magnesium sulphate + epinephrine

Comparison: no treatment or normal saline + epinephrine

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

no treatment or normal saline + epinephrine

Magnesium sulphate + epinephrine

Time to recovery

Outcome not measured

Mortality

Outcome not measured

Adverse events

Outcome not measured

Duration of hospital stay

The mean (SD) duration of hospital stay in the epinephrine group was 84.7 hours (10.1)

The mean (SD) duration of hospital stay for the magnesium sulphate + epinephrine group was 0.40 hours less (3.94 lower to 3.14 higher)

MD ‐0.40

(‐3.94 to 3.14)

120
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very lowa

Clinical severity score (CSS)

(RDAI score; range 0 to 17; higher = poorer outcomes)

measured at 0 to 24 hours
after treatment

The mean (SD) CSS at 24 hours in the epinephrine group was 6.6 points (2.2)

The mean CSS at 24 hours in the magnesium sulphate + epinephrine group was 0.20 points lower (1.06 lower to 0.66 higher)

MD ‐0.20 (‐1.06 to 0.66)

120
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very lowa

Clinical severity score (CSS)

(RDAI score; range 0 to 17; higher = poorer outcomes)

measured 25 to 48 hours
after treatment

The mean (SD) CSS at 48 hours in the epinephrine group was 3.7 points (2.7)

The mean CSS at 48 hours in the magnesium sulphate + epinephrine group was 0.90 points lower (1.75 lower to 0.05 lower)

MD ‐0.90 (‐1.75 to ‐0.05)

120
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very lowa

Higher value indicates poor outcome

Hospital re‐admission within 30 days of discharge

Outcome not measured

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; MD: mean difference; SD: standard deviation; RCT: randomised controlled trial

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality. Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality. Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality. Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality. We are very uncertain about the estimate.

aWe downgraded the evidence to very low for indirectness and very serious imprecision (1 study, small sample size).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 4. Magnesium sulphate + epinephrine compared with no treatment or normal saline + epinephrine
Table 1. Comparisons and outcomes for which analyses could not be conducted

Outcome

Comparison

Reason for not conducting analysis

Time to recovery

All comparisons

No data available

Mortality

Magnesium sulphate compared with placebo

No deaths reported

magnesium sulphate compared with conventional bronchodilator

Magnesium sulphate + bronchodilator compared with no treatment or normal saline + the same bronchodilator

Magnesium sulphate compared with hypertonic saline

No data available

Magnesium sulphate + epinephrine compared with no treatment or normal saline + epinephrine

Adverse effects of magnesium sulphate treatment

Magnesium sulphate compared with placebo

No adverse effects reported

Magnesium sulphate compared with conventional bronchodilator

Magnesium sulphate + bronchodilator compared with no treatment or normal saline + the same bronchodilator

Magnesium sulphate compared with hypertonic saline

No data available

Magnesium sulphate + epinephrine compared with no treatment or normal saline + epinephrine

Duration of hospital stay

Magnesium sulphate compared with placebo

Reporting format was different. Study authors used geometric mean timea. We did not transform data for analysis, as only single study was available for this comparison.

Magnesium sulphate compared with conventional bronchodilator

Reporting format was different. Study authors used 95% confidence interval. We did not transform data for analysis, as only single study was available for this comparison.

Magnesium sulphate + bronchodilator compared with no treatment or normal saline + the same bronchodilator

Clinical severity score at 0 to 24 hours after treatment

Magnesium sulphate compared with hypertonic saline

No data available

Magnesium sulphate compared with conventional bronchodilator

Magnesium sulphate + bronchodilator compared with no treatment or normal saline + the same bronchodilator

Clinical severity score at 25 to 48 hours after treatment

Magnesium sulphate compared with conventional bronchodilator

No data available

Magnesium sulphate + bronchodilator compared with no treatment or normal saline + the same bronchodilator

Pulmonary function test

All comparisons

No data available

Hospital readmission rate within 30 days of discharge

All comparisons except magnesium sulphate compared with placebo

No data available

Duration of mechanical ventilation

All comparisons

No data available

Duration of intensive care unit stay

All comparisons

No data available

Note: these analyses were planned in the protocol, but were not carried out due to limited or no available data.

aGeometric mean is equal to the exponential of the mean of the log‐transformed values. The value of geometric mean is usually lesser than the arithmetic mean. Geometric mean is used as it is not much affected by the skewed distribution of data.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Comparisons and outcomes for which analyses could not be conducted
Comparison 1. Magnesium sulphate compared with placebo for acute bronchiolitis in children

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Clinical severity score at 0 to 24 hours after treatment Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.2 Clinical severity score at 25 to 48 hours after treatment Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.3 Hospital readmission rate within 30 days of discharge Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Magnesium sulphate compared with placebo for acute bronchiolitis in children
Comparison 2. Magnesium sulphate compared with hypertonic saline for acute bronchiolitis in children

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

2.1 Duration of hospital stay Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.2 Clinical severity score at 25 to 48 hours after treatment Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Magnesium sulphate compared with hypertonic saline for acute bronchiolitis in children
Comparison 3. Magnesium sulphate + epinephrine compared with no treatment or normal saline + epinephrine for acute bronchiolitis in children

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

3.1 Duration of hospital stay Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.2 Clinical severity score at 0 to 24 hour after treatment Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.3 Clinical severity score at 25 to 48 hour after treatment Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Magnesium sulphate + epinephrine compared with no treatment or normal saline + epinephrine for acute bronchiolitis in children